I was going to comment on that, but you beat me to it. I'm in my mid-60s now, but I played with Lego well into my teens. I never carried it around to play with it, and neither did my younger brother. That would have been a great way to lose pieces. This is strictly an indoor toy, not an outdoor one. It's fun, though. My younger brother and I rarely got along, but Lego and making cakes, cookies, etc. were exceptions. We would play Lego solo or together. It's flexible that way. Apparently, whoever was supposed to check the story for errors before posting it has no real familiarity with Lego. Although I'm female, most Lego fans are probably male, so I'm guessing that the story author is female.
Of all of the incredible situations that are part and parcel to these stories the one I find least credible is the police fast actions in getting the toy tested. Even with the precept of prior targeting of children the police don't always follow to form.
Marital affairs affect everyone involved from the nuclear to the extended family members of the affair partners. The old saying is if the partner could cheat with you then they could and probably would cheat on you.
It was always going to be one of two people, the ex or a mistress. I don't know what country this is supposed to be set in, but in my country, the police do not respond that fast. This story is better than some other cheating husband stories as it has a bit of a mystery attached to it.
@@phyllisborchers9444 lol, no, it's an error from an AI transcription. This whole post, from the ridiculously drawn-out speed of the delivery to the excessive amount of unnecessary detail absolutely screams AI-generated!
Was the boy be able to play with the toy he was given? He had loved the kind of toy he was given. He should not be punished what he was looking for? Others looked to afford the toy they thought he deserve. GPS should be able to remove from the toy, and the criminal was guilty, evidence should be given back. Nice all the security bought. The boy deserve his toy gift. It was not his fault and be punished for his loss.
Placing the gps tracker on a toy that won't leave the house? I could understand a camera/listening device maybe. 🤔
I was going to comment on that, but you beat me to it. I'm in my mid-60s now, but I played with Lego well into my teens. I never carried it around to play with it, and neither did my younger brother. That would have been a great way to lose pieces. This is strictly an indoor toy, not an outdoor one. It's fun, though. My younger brother and I rarely got along, but Lego and making cakes, cookies, etc. were exceptions. We would play Lego solo or together. It's flexible that way. Apparently, whoever was supposed to check the story for errors before posting it has no real familiarity with Lego. Although I'm female, most Lego fans are probably male, so I'm guessing that the story author is female.
Of all of the incredible situations that are part and parcel to these stories the one I find least credible is the police fast actions in getting the toy tested. Even with the precept of prior targeting of children the police don't always follow to form.
Marital affairs affect everyone involved from the nuclear to the extended family members of the affair partners. The old saying is if the partner could cheat with you then they could and probably would cheat on you.
I thought grand parents were supposed to love the children
It was always going to be one of two people, the ex or a mistress. I don't know what country this is supposed to be set in, but in my country, the police do not respond that fast. This story is better than some other cheating husband stories as it has a bit of a mystery attached to it.
Anti stalking, not anti-stocking
Yes, that made me laugh when I read it.
That could be a easy error if your brain working fast on story and hand going average for transcribing it down
@@phyllisborchers9444 That is why other people proofread.
@@phyllisborchers9444 lol, no, it's an error from an AI transcription. This whole post, from the ridiculously drawn-out speed of the delivery to the excessive amount of unnecessary detail absolutely screams AI-generated!
I think she should have gotten ex involved.
Was the boy be able to play with the toy he was given? He had loved the kind of toy he was given. He should not be punished what he was looking for? Others looked to afford the toy they thought he deserve. GPS should be able to remove from the toy, and the criminal was guilty, evidence should be given back. Nice all the security bought. The boy deserve his toy gift. It was not his fault and be punished for his loss.
Hate AI