33. Stuart England and the American Colonial Experiment
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
- The reign of James I and Charles I brought into focus the rising tension between Puritan forces in England and the entrenched power of traditional 'divine right' philosophy. While many of the Puritans stayed in England to work toward a new vision of English polity, others took the voyage across the sea to participate in establishing a 'new' England, and with this venture the American experiement in republican goverance got under way. The defining statement of the philosophy of this experiement was captured in one of the most famous sermons ever preached in America, John Winthrop's City on a Hill. This lecture traces this history of the third of 17th Century England, and the interests that led to the establishment of the Jamestown Colony, the Plymouth Colony, and the Massachusetts Bay Colony. For more resources, please visit www.brucegore.com.
Love all these lectures! God bless!
+Darryl K. Harrison Thank you!
I’m from England and this is all news to me, very interesting
Thanks a lot for your excellent lectures! I am getting ready for an exam in France based on British and American civilization, and I haven't find so far anything better than your prominent discourse!!!! Your idea that these are not kings but religious thoughts and leaders that shape the historical context has completely reshaped my own understaning and vision of history. Thanks again!
+Natallia Salauyova You are very welcome, and thank you for such encouragement!
Thanks for the video clip!
Very much enjoy ur letcures and balanced presentation of the facts.
Just a jewel to listen his lectures.
Thank you Bruce I love the history Can't Get Enough😎👍🏻
[1:55-2:11] - Stewart is the English spelling, but the French spelling Stuart was adopted by Mary, Queen of Scots, when she was living in France.
...btw, love your teachings!!
Nice lecture.
Thanks!
Sure thing. I am teaching one of my kids AP Euro at home. I listen to different lectures to get a good narrative. Yours is one of the best.
I`m decendent of Shlomo Guggenhein .In wich came about 1890 to Zacatecas Mexico to the mine. Noria de Angeles . From borned his two son . Spiridion and Tehodoro Santillan my granfather. And the sister of Shlomo Eleonor Guggenheim married with Arthur Stewart. from Scotland
Being a Scandinavian Lutheran, I am still surprised how close we protestants are in theology. So I've enjoyed this lecture serie. Just one wish though, could you gather all your lectures in your account, would be easier to find next lecture in the serie.
Thanks for recording and publish your lectures.
Thanks for the kind feedback! You can find the Church History playlist at:ua-cam.com/video/kHtCDU-v-BU/v-deo.html
Thx
Thank you.
Your history lessons are my education for connecting the dots from when jesusofnazarethkingofthejews rose from the dead to the present.
Again, thank you.
You are very welcome. Thanks for your interest!
My new podcast :)
1) It has been recorded that King James did not like the Geneva Bible and needed only a pretext to publish a Bible that corrected some of the errors and points of disagreement he had with it. Nevertheless, the King James Version did prevail, causing the Geneva Bible to be out of print for 400 years.
2)That quotation of Deuteronomy 30:19, part of your Sunday School Lesson, with the exhortation to CHOOSE life has an Arminian ring to it.
King James Bible along with the works of Shakespeare helped to shape and stabilise the English language. In the UK the King James bible was still the main text used in churches until many years after World War II. I started reading it for myself at the age of 8 from 1957 onwards due to regular attendance at Sunday School.
Every once in a while they have been adding one of your vids to my "recommended" on the home page and on the individual video page sidebar. Wanted to let you know what kind of visibility they give to you sir.
Have attended and participated in the Utah Shakes spear Festival in Cedar City. Cool stuff,... I agree. Wrote my paper for ENG 401 on Macbeth,... aced it. My research revolved around Owain Glyn Dwr. He was a "real" person as well as this particular Macbeth.
Just wanted to say, "hello." Am going back to the low grade entertainment vids. There is another version of Halo that some kid has put up. I really like those. :)
EDit: Oh, got some of the new chocolate flavored milk derivative for coffee. Having some now. Tastes great... thought I would pass that along. Carnation coffee creamer type... tonnes of genetic modifications and gene strand manipulation.
Always nice to hear from you, my very interesting friend!
Although you do hear the Plymouth company came to escape religious persecution vs profit, it seems to me the Plymouth company came to affirm their OWN religious persecution, which they could not do in England or Holland. The following generations were brutally persecutive of subsequent people who came into the area from Europe.
It's true that at the beginning of the colonial era there was not a very robust notion of religious tolerance. That would come later, and culminated in First Amendment protections for 'free exercise' with the guard against 'establishment.' In the colonies, however, folks were free to move about, and find a community of faith that suited their conscience. That was not available in merry old England.
You mention at the beginning Master's work at Eastern. There are probably many colleges and universities called "Eastern", but would this happen to be Eastern in St. David's PA?
David Gaiser Sorry. Eastern Washington University. My audience was familiar with the reference.
Amen
The first King shot to death with a firearm was a Stewart. The first man to shoot a king to death with a firearm was also a Stewart. Now I learn we started the USA as a private company, doing god's will. Presumably it's since become a religious charity. And the King James Bible, of course. That was us. And yet, where is the love? While we ruled, church and state were separate. Since 1842, the whole thing in the British Empire has been a state controlled religion. It's called secular, but it is very far from it. Great lecture!
I haven't found, :), sorry...
I know the Puritans objected to the more or less appearance of the Anglican worship. Yet the anglicans at that time we're reading very large amounts of the Bible in their services, assuming their services conformed to the prayer book at that time, which I understand was the service, reading the majority of the Bible each year, with only a small homily of men's words. If Puritan services are like normal expository preaching today, you only get a teeny tiny snippet of the Bible in any service with most of the service being, for lack of a better term, man's words, which seem better placed in a great Sunday School like yours. It seems like the Puritans would have wanted people to be exposed to these large amounts of the Bible. I find the Puritan complaints confusing in substance, if understandable on the surface (I.e., appearance). I can see that it may not have been their preference, but I find it odd that they would have ject to so much Bible in a service. Do you have any further thoughts or information on this? I would certainly appreciate it, as I do this entire wonderful series. Thank you, and Our Lord Jesus bless you!
Puritan services bore precious little resemblance to 'normal expository preaching today.'
@@GoreBruce Thank you!!
Protestant didn’t change the market, to attribute the change in the market to the reformation makes no sense.
Previous to this point the market wasn’t dominated by the crown as he here says but dominated by Venetian and Genovés merchant and they were privete enterprise, they didn’t not belong to absolute catholic monarchy.
Spain and Portugal financed the “discovery routes” in order to find a open route to the east, because the Ottoman broken the market flow at this time.
This did not happen because of Luther. The reformation isn’t a cause for the change in Europe market.
Neither of the binomios Crown/private
Or
Catholic/Protestant
Are reason for the change in the market.
Please keep fact checks in order to make history the less arbitrary possible and to avoid the spread of fallacy.
The Queen Elizabeth that's sits on a throne today though she may be called a part of the stuart Clan she has no relations to the real staurd clan which King James the 1st and the 6th was apart of.
Queen Eliizabeth II is descended from Mary Queen of Scots through her grand-daughter Elizabeth who Married the Elector Palatine. The modern legitimate dynastic Stuart claim to the English throne is with Franz Bonaventura Adalbert Maria Herzog von Bayern. I suppose we could trade a German Protestant ruler in and replace her with a German Catholic
if your looking for a "British" claimant to the English throne via the bastards of Charles II and James II then Prince Charles's son Prince William has a good claim through his mother who is descended from the illegitimate lines. If he ever becomes King he will re-introduce Habsburg, Medici and Bourbon blood into the succession for the first time since Queen Anne.
what religion are you
Please see 'about' page. ua-cam.com/users/GoreBruceabout?disable_polymer=1
Think madoc ont
Indeed well juiced up... Hahaha