Phillip felt strongly he could “help” Diana because he felt like they were in the same predicaments, but Phillips failed to notice how the differences cast a valley between their thinking. Namely, his wife loved him unconditionally, and Diana’s husband…certainly not.
Strongly agree. I did a history essay on Diana in high school. Honestly I felt for her. I have little respect for Camilla. Diana seemed to have suffered because Charles didn’t give her a chance. Which is so sad and awful. I wonder what life would have been like if Charles gave Diana the time of day. I was a little kid when Diana died. But the look of shock on my mum’s face is something I have never forgotten. I don’t think Diana would have liked Meghan purely for rift she has put between Will and Harry.
@@lauraclaire actually it was reported by many that Charles actually paused his affair with Camilla just after he married Diana and only resumed said affair after Diana cheated on him first with her bodyguard. Regardless of whether this report is true or not, Diana was actually a difficult wife as well. There were many reports that Charles fired many staff, rehomed his dog, and had to distance himself from his friends just to please Diana because she didn't like them. Apparently, he would also try to get Diana professional help for her bulima, but she would refuse it. And if we were to talk about infidelity, infidelity went both ways. In fact, Diana actually cheated first in the marriage (something she admits in an interview, but I can't remember which one) and she even had affairs with multiple men including married ones, breaking multiple marriages in the process. Apparently, Diana actually had obsessive tendencies where the wives of men she had slept with, would actually file restraining orders against her. Either way, none of this condones Charles as he was far from the perfect husband, but to say that he was the only one wrong in the marriage is simply not true.
@@GTK4217 again if you read carefully what I commented Charles did try to please and make Diana happy just after they got married. It's only after having been married to Diana for a while that Charles had enough of her behaviour and went back to his lover Camilla. Besides if you want to talk about emotional abuse, did you know that Diana actually pretended to have the same interests and hobbies as Charles to be seen as a suitable wife? And then she dismissed those hobbies as boring and tried to get Charles to drop them during her honeymoon with Charles? Did you also know that those staff Charles had to fire just to please her needed those jobs? But that they only got fired, not because of their incompetence, but just because Diana didn't like them? Did you also know that the dog Charles had was his longtime companion that he had to let it go just because Diana didn't like pets? And what of the wives of the marriages that Diana broke? Did they deserve that? I am not saying Charles was the ideal husband, he wasn't, but if we were to look at this objectively, both parties were flawed and ultimately not suited for one another
Diana literally said IN ON SCREEN INTERVIEW she threw a vase at Charles within 2 years of marrige because she felt 'INHEARD IN THE SYSTEM"... Not only that but she tried to kill herself while pregnant with william and threw herself down the stairs in the last trimester of pregnancy with Harry.. She also married Charles who she said told her about his love for Camilla before marrige... Where she was failed was the lack of help for her serious mental problems. . She could have allowed charles to hook up with camila (something its implied she said he could do when he told her about his love for camilla) and gone on to have secret affairs with whoever she wished... with Charles blessing, had she only stayed quiet. Yes, Charles was seeing other women, but he didnt choose Diana and even she said he was cool with her "having fun" as long as it wasnt photographed. Charles, even though he cheated chronically... was NEVER photographed with camilla while married. Diana however was photographed with 3 married men. At her private apartment@@GTK4217
“I can be a tough, old nut, but I’ve always had a soft spot for you. Maybe because you’re young. Maybe because you’re a beautiful woman. Maybe because I often share your frustration with your husband. You know, I’ve always felt protective of you. Fond of you. There, I said it.” In that moment, it was Tobias Menzies’ Philip speaking, not Jonathan Pryce. It was everything Tobias’ Philip wanted to say to Emma Corrin’s Diana at the end of 4x10 but didn’t.
He wasn't wrong - the problem is, Diana wasn't content to play the game. Not fufilling. And for too long she thought she could make Charles love her - fantasy. Sadly, for all of her good qualities, immaturity, self doubt that crying need for validation too often got the better of her :(
I adored Diana. But Ive always had a different perspective than others. I believe Charles did love her. Being 'in love' & loving someone is not the same. You cant help what your heart feels. But too often, she spoke before she thought. She used the media, for everything. Not realizing, that once you did that, there was no going back. Charles & Diana were both emotionally scarred, & flawed individuals.
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc At least I acknowledge my lunacy, and I don't go on videos spewing vitriol for a woman long dead. Wouldn't be caught dead defending Camilla!
I agree completely. Diana I feel was used to getting her way. And Charles did love her, but what he did with Camilla was unacceptable. I'm not sure what I would've done if I was Diana. I really don't know
Given Diana was with Hasnat Khan for 2 years in complete secrecy, it shows she could have had her cake and eaten it too. I understand she was desperately unhappy, but with time and maturity, C&D might have reached an amicable agreement. If only...
Basically screw around as much as you like on the days off. Unfortunately being diana even sweet shopping in Tetbury after the wedding was big news. The Queen called the press to BH. "Get her staff to buy them" the queen answered with " oh really?" I think the editors were wondering who's going to The Tower after that.
I think a part of why Phillip could not relate to Diana was girls were treated FAR worse in the royal family than boys. Endless speculation about weight, pregnancy, attire, sex lives, all swirled around female royals more than male. So for him it was oppressive, but for her, unbearable.
Phillip was treated quite unfairly in the beginning. It only stopped when he grew into his role and managed to use the system to his advantage. In the beginning, he was the foreigner, the brother of Nazis, the trophy husband (quite unbearable for a man of his generation and with his sense of pride). The reason why he couldn't relate to Diana was because he, in the end, managed to get accustomed to the system and because he understood that loyalty to the family as a whole was more important than the individual. Diana thought the opposite, feeling that her feelings were more valid than the stability of the family (a sentiment she and her husband shared). Phillip couldn't understand that she was unable to act happy for appearances sake in public as he had done.
I think that is more on the tabloids than the royals. The tabloids hold women to much higher beauty standards than men. But Diana proactively engaged with them
I really wish Diana had been mature enough to have found a half way point with Charles (although hes always been ridiculousness incarnate), then she might be alive and our Queen right now.
Diana ruined 3 MARRIGES... 3 married men she slept with publicly. 3 innocent wives husbands she slept with. Her body guard (he chose her over his wife and she tossed him aside 3 months later), Her polo instructor (slept with him, press caught him leaving her apartment at 3am and his life devastated, left him), and army captain james hewit, had a open affair with him, took married him to many events (where she was the most photographed person in the world) and kissed him on the cheek holding hands KNOWING IT WOULD BE PRINTED.... Andrew, Camillas husband knew she was seeing charels from jump and didnt GAF because he was screwing anne. The wives of the men Diana fked were unrelated innocent third parties not in the game.
What I've learned from things like the crown and Harry walking away is that the 'royals" have to show to the outside world that they are somehow more special, appointed by God, or they lose their life of luxury. A "working" royal. You goto a luncheon at a daycare or shelter for women, listen to a speech, give a speech and never have to think about that place or those people again until next year. So you do luncheons and dinners and give speeches 2 maybe 3 times a day. Sounds like a lot of playing. 😊. And rocking the boat would show there is no need for them. It's like many areas of our government that aren't necessary.
When you've been to a lunch or a ceremony a hundred times, it is probably more work than play. Their presence generates a lot of public interest to causes that may otherwise fail.
@@MsJubjubbird Correct! People are very drawn to FAME and famous people like queen Elizabeth or princess Diana, certainly were famous world wide. 😊. There is pressure on them to "perform".
The excessive expectations, which became unrealistic and then impossible, tipping over into sustained personal attacks, because there can only be one saint at a time and there also has to be a villain/whore, came not from the royal family but from the press and mass media. In part that was the industry and its owners, but ultimately it was the public at large who consumed and paid for all that. The "system" is of the public's making. We are the one's who delude ourselves and willingly suspend our disbelief. This is not unique to a monarchy. There are fantasies and deceptions around an elected presidency and a theocracy too. We got to kill our fairy princess, indulge in recreational mourning and then point the finger of blame away from ourselves. That was the kind of emotional workout a good "women's film" used to give us, but in real time. We used to hold Hollywood stars up to those impossible standards. Gay men had to go out with pretend girlfriends. Ingrid Bergman was shamed for becoming known to have a relationship outside marriage and banished from the screen. Charlie Chaplin was allowed to get away with paedophilia, but banished for being a socialist. You could do all of those things, but that depended on the press agreeing to turn a blind eye. There must have been some quid pro quo for that to happen.
If there was a rule existed for charles he is not allowed to get divorce /widow remarriage / second marriage otherwise the church of england never recognise him as future monarch then he never dared to do this to diana .phillip and queen are not allowed to get divorce . Phillips had a strong guarantee .he all through his life wandered and played games and also ruined charles by taking so many worst decision in his life . Like father like son also had affairs but the thing is charles chose personal life over duty and queen never does that and she always took her duty very seriously
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc... The beautiful woman Diana will always remain, loved world wide, yet she wasn't loved by the man she loved. The Landmine Manufacturers took out Diana for exposing them. Had Charles remained faithful to Diana and not divorced she would not have been allowed to get involved in such projects as the wife of the future King.
@@NaatClark ... Camilla was in Charles's life before they married, during their marriage and after they divorced. Charles alleged to have once said - Diana is beautiful, yes, but not very intelligent.
The great thing about symbols is that the less explicit they are, the more we are free to make our own interpretations. So we confirm what we already think. Modern London has escaped parakeets - noisy colourful birds - roosting in the trees. Vultures - probably none.
Sir, I hope you are not implying that the viewers of The Crown are stupid Americans if this is the case then you and the "Royals" are not too bright either. If my woman's intuition is wrong then excuse me, please. I've never seen The Crown but I only enjoy posting the comments here as it passes some time while I'm just waiting for a friend. Relax, be happy ☺️.
There is No system its about choosing between love and power/money. if you want both then you should be honest truthful to the ppl mattered and concerned. charles camilla and diana should have discussed what to do next in a conference hall(just 3 of them along with their families) and how to solve the problem they are in.
Philip had a wife of many years, a sister in law, four children and multiple grandchildren. He will put them all before Diana. Not to mention, he dedicated his whole life to service to the crown and was not about to throw it away for one troublemaker.
@@clearsky4003 Charles still played the game of being in the royal family and was one of the four children Philip had a responsibility to, especially being the heir
I know I'm in the minority here about the actress portraying Diana, but I think she plays Diana more like a caricature than a real person. She's got the voice right, but too much head down but with eyes up and pouting all the time.
If they would have hired someone for the "princess of whales" job. That would have been better and she would be alive now. Or Charles and Diana could have stayed as FRIENDS for the position/title and Duty for the country till William becomes big and takes up the crown after marrying an EU aristocratic princess , after that Charles and Diana could have got divorced and married whoever they LOVED.
Phillip felt strongly he could “help” Diana because he felt like they were in the same predicaments, but Phillips failed to notice how the differences cast a valley between their thinking. Namely, his wife loved him unconditionally, and Diana’s husband…certainly not.
Strongly agree. I did a history essay on Diana in high school. Honestly I felt for her. I have little respect for Camilla. Diana seemed to have suffered because Charles didn’t give her a chance. Which is so sad and awful. I wonder what life would have been like if Charles gave Diana the time of day. I was a little kid when Diana died. But the look of shock on my mum’s face is something I have never forgotten. I don’t think Diana would have liked Meghan purely for rift she has put between Will and Harry.
@@lauraclaire actually it was reported by many that Charles actually paused his affair with Camilla just after he married Diana and only resumed said affair after Diana cheated on him first with her bodyguard. Regardless of whether this report is true or not, Diana was actually a difficult wife as well. There were many reports that Charles fired many staff, rehomed his dog, and had to distance himself from his friends just to please Diana because she didn't like them. Apparently, he would also try to get Diana professional help for her bulima, but she would refuse it. And if we were to talk about infidelity, infidelity went both ways. In fact, Diana actually cheated first in the marriage (something she admits in an interview, but I can't remember which one) and she even had affairs with multiple men including married ones, breaking multiple marriages in the process. Apparently, Diana actually had obsessive tendencies where the wives of men she had slept with, would actually file restraining orders against her. Either way, none of this condones Charles as he was far from the perfect husband, but to say that he was the only one wrong in the marriage is simply not true.
@@ellevillamor4454before or after Charles consistently emotionally abused Diana since the beginning of their marriage?
@@GTK4217 again if you read carefully what I commented Charles did try to please and make Diana happy just after they got married. It's only after having been married to Diana for a while that Charles had enough of her behaviour and went back to his lover Camilla. Besides if you want to talk about emotional abuse, did you know that Diana actually pretended to have the same interests and hobbies as Charles to be seen as a suitable wife? And then she dismissed those hobbies as boring and tried to get Charles to drop them during her honeymoon with Charles? Did you also know that those staff Charles had to fire just to please her needed those jobs? But that they only got fired, not because of their incompetence, but just because Diana didn't like them? Did you also know that the dog Charles had was his longtime companion that he had to let it go just because Diana didn't like pets? And what of the wives of the marriages that Diana broke? Did they deserve that? I am not saying Charles was the ideal husband, he wasn't, but if we were to look at this objectively, both parties were flawed and ultimately not suited for one another
Diana literally said IN ON SCREEN INTERVIEW she threw a vase at Charles within 2 years of marrige because she felt 'INHEARD IN THE SYSTEM"... Not only that but she tried to kill herself while pregnant with william and threw herself down the stairs in the last trimester of pregnancy with Harry.. She also married Charles who she said told her about his love for Camilla before marrige... Where she was failed was the lack of help for her serious mental problems. . She could have allowed charles to hook up with camila (something its implied she said he could do when he told her about his love for camilla) and gone on to have secret affairs with whoever she wished... with Charles blessing, had she only stayed quiet. Yes, Charles was seeing other women, but he didnt choose Diana and even she said he was cool with her "having fun" as long as it wasnt photographed. Charles, even though he cheated chronically... was NEVER photographed with camilla while married. Diana however was photographed with 3 married men. At her private apartment@@GTK4217
She was so young in the beginning. Really she did not have a hope. Poor girl, it cost her life in a round about way.
“I can be a tough, old nut, but I’ve always had a soft spot for you. Maybe because you’re young. Maybe because you’re a beautiful woman. Maybe because I often share your frustration with your husband. You know, I’ve always felt protective of you. Fond of you. There, I said it.” In that moment, it was Tobias Menzies’ Philip speaking, not Jonathan Pryce. It was everything Tobias’ Philip wanted to say to Emma Corrin’s Diana at the end of 4x10 but didn’t.
Jonathan Pryce is a fantastic actor, his Shylock was second to none.
He starts out very nice and cordial and then slips in those words "privacy" and confidentiality." Then he goes right for her throat!
He wasn't wrong - the problem is, Diana wasn't content to play the game. Not fufilling. And for too long she thought she could make Charles love her - fantasy. Sadly, for all of her good qualities, immaturity, self doubt that crying need for validation too often got the better of her :(
Great ending....the bird flying high....AND FREE!
I adored Diana. But Ive always had a different perspective than others. I believe Charles did love her. Being 'in love' & loving someone is not the same. You cant help what your heart feels. But too often, she spoke before she thought. She used the media, for everything. Not realizing, that once you did that, there was no going back. Charles & Diana were both emotionally scarred, & flawed individuals.
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jcYour hate boner for Diana is crazy. Going on here defending your stance like a loon 😆
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc At least I acknowledge my lunacy, and I don't go on videos spewing vitriol for a woman long dead. Wouldn't be caught dead defending Camilla!
I agree completely. Diana I feel was used to getting her way. And Charles did love her, but what he did with Camilla was unacceptable. I'm not sure what I would've done if I was Diana. I really don't know
@@mvdum29Yes….no lunacy in YOUR words here today for harmful actions taken 30 years ago. None whatsoever.
Given Diana was with Hasnat Khan for 2 years in complete secrecy, it shows she could have had her cake and eaten it too. I understand she was desperately unhappy, but with time and maturity, C&D might have reached an amicable agreement.
If only...
Keep coming with the crown videos. My favorite show on Netflix. Please
The bird circling may have symbolized that in a sense, Diana was already dead in a lot of ways.
0:48 "Ghastly!" Jonathan Pryce said it in The Crown, PotC, and maybe Tomorrow Never Dies
Basically screw around as much as you like on the days off. Unfortunately being diana even sweet shopping in Tetbury after the wedding was big news. The Queen called the press to BH. "Get her staff to buy them" the queen answered with " oh really?" I think the editors were wondering who's going to The Tower after that.
I think a part of why Phillip could not relate to Diana was girls were treated FAR worse in the royal family than boys. Endless speculation about weight, pregnancy, attire, sex lives, all swirled around female royals more than male. So for him it was oppressive, but for her, unbearable.
Phillip was treated quite unfairly in the beginning. It only stopped when he grew into his role and managed to use the system to his advantage. In the beginning, he was the foreigner, the brother of Nazis, the trophy husband (quite unbearable for a man of his generation and with his sense of pride).
The reason why he couldn't relate to Diana was because he, in the end, managed to get accustomed to the system and because he understood that loyalty to the family as a whole was more important than the individual. Diana thought the opposite, feeling that her feelings were more valid than the stability of the family (a sentiment she and her husband shared). Phillip couldn't understand that she was unable to act happy for appearances sake in public as he had done.
I think that is more on the tabloids than the royals. The tabloids hold women to much higher beauty standards than men. But Diana proactively engaged with them
I really wish Diana had been mature enough to have found a half way point with Charles (although hes always been ridiculousness incarnate), then she might be alive and our Queen right now.
Poor Diana rocked the boat.....
And the Royal Family has paid the price dearly ever since, unfortunately. 🙁
She should tell him she wants something better for William
Diana ruined 3 MARRIGES... 3 married men she slept with publicly. 3 innocent wives husbands she slept with. Her body guard (he chose her over his wife and she tossed him aside 3 months later), Her polo instructor (slept with him, press caught him leaving her apartment at 3am and his life devastated, left him), and army captain james hewit, had a open affair with him, took married him to many events (where she was the most photographed person in the world) and kissed him on the cheek holding hands KNOWING IT WOULD BE PRINTED.... Andrew, Camillas husband knew she was seeing charels from jump and didnt GAF because he was screwing anne. The wives of the men Diana fked were unrelated innocent third parties not in the game.
He had liited time for Diana but had all sorts of tine for Lady Romsey, enough to teach her carriage racing!
What I've learned from things like the crown and Harry walking away is that the 'royals" have to show to the outside world that they are somehow more special, appointed by God, or they lose their life of luxury. A "working" royal. You goto a luncheon at a daycare or shelter for women, listen to a speech, give a speech and never have to think about that place or those people again until next year. So you do luncheons and dinners and give speeches 2 maybe 3 times a day. Sounds like a lot of playing. 😊. And rocking the boat would show there is no need for them. It's like many areas of our government that aren't necessary.
When you've been to a lunch or a ceremony a hundred times, it is probably more work than play. Their presence generates a lot of public interest to causes that may otherwise fail.
@@MsJubjubbird Correct! People are very drawn to FAME and famous people like queen Elizabeth or princess Diana, certainly were famous world wide. 😊. There is pressure on them to "perform".
Impressive how you managed to discount all of Ann's actual charity work
The excessive expectations, which became unrealistic and then impossible, tipping over into sustained personal attacks, because there can only be one saint at a time and there also has to be a villain/whore, came not from the royal family but from the press and mass media. In part that was the industry and its owners, but ultimately it was the public at large who consumed and paid for all that.
The "system" is of the public's making. We are the one's who delude ourselves and willingly suspend our disbelief. This is not unique to a monarchy. There are fantasies and deceptions around an elected presidency and a theocracy too.
We got to kill our fairy princess, indulge in recreational mourning and then point the finger of blame away from ourselves. That was the kind of emotional workout a good "women's film" used to give us, but in real time.
We used to hold Hollywood stars up to those impossible standards. Gay men had to go out with pretend girlfriends. Ingrid Bergman was shamed for becoming known to have a relationship outside marriage and banished from the screen. Charlie Chaplin was allowed to get away with paedophilia, but banished for being a socialist. You could do all of those things, but that depended on the press agreeing to turn a blind eye. There must have been some quid pro quo for that to happen.
Hang on is this the same Jonathan Pryce who was the original Engineer in “Miss Saigon”?
Price was miscast as Phillip....What were they thinking?
Charles Dance would have been far better.
Oh oh, bad omen in the sky.
If there was a rule existed for charles he is not allowed to get divorce /widow remarriage / second marriage otherwise the church of england never recognise him as future monarch then he never dared to do this to diana .phillip and queen are not allowed to get divorce . Phillips had a strong guarantee .he all through his life wandered and played games and also ruined charles by taking so many worst decision in his life . Like father like son also had affairs but the thing is charles chose personal life over duty and queen never does that and she always took her duty very seriously
And Charles was not discreet about his affair!
she did not follow his advice
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jcBooks written by the Charles-propagandists? How devious to let the public know how awful the royal family was to her
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc... The beautiful woman Diana will always remain, loved world wide, yet she wasn't loved by the man she loved. The Landmine Manufacturers took out Diana for exposing them. Had Charles remained faithful to Diana and not divorced she would not have been allowed to get involved in such projects as the wife of the future King.
@@erzsebethyoung Had she not cheated on him first you mean?
@@NaatClark ... Camilla was in Charles's life before they married, during their marriage and after they divorced. Charles alleged to have once said - Diana is beautiful, yes, but not very intelligent.
@@erzsebethyoung
I never thought she was beautiful, but she clearly was not intelligent. Look at with whom she died.
Thinking of rewatching this for the 3.rd time
Same here. Seen too many crown vids on my algorithm to not rewatch.
I wonder what the symbolism of Prince Phillip seeing the bird circling around was about. Anyone wanna take a gander/guess?
Phillip is the vulture and diana is the prey . Hope u can understand
The great thing about symbols is that the less explicit they are, the more we are free to make our own interpretations. So we confirm what we already think. Modern London has escaped parakeets - noisy colourful birds - roosting in the trees. Vultures - probably none.
I assume it's a buzzard circling
I like how there's a totally non symbolic vulture above the palace. Because the audience is stupid and needs these kind of references.
🤣
Thought it was an eagle
@@RavingCelt009 eagle, vulture, both have no place in central london. it's symbolic. And very effective!
Sir, I hope you are not implying that the viewers of The Crown are stupid Americans if this is the case then you and the "Royals" are not too bright either. If my woman's intuition is wrong then excuse me, please. I've never seen The Crown but I only enjoy posting the comments here as it passes some time while I'm just waiting for a friend. Relax, be happy ☺️.
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc i'm implying the crown has little faith in the intellectual level of its audience.
There is No system
its about choosing between love and power/money. if you want both then you should be honest truthful to the ppl mattered and concerned. charles camilla and diana should have discussed what to do next in a conference hall(just 3 of them along with their families) and how to solve the problem they are in.
It could be seen as a threat
It is a threat
And Prince Philip was racist
ha she told the sytem to go to hell
The system made sure she go to hell..😂😂😂
Jonathan Price didn't even have the decency to learn basic table manners for his role in the crown. NOT A TRUE ACTOR.
He thought he was still in King's Landing, unwashed and barefoot and wearing burlap. Terrible casting. It should have been Charles Dance.
@livingincaptivityIII Agreed
Remember this is only drama. People take these dramas too seriously.
Phillip ostensibly wanted to help Diana, but ended up being part of the problem. The selfish old geezer was trying to protect his own privileged life.
Philip had a wife of many years, a sister in law, four children and multiple grandchildren. He will put them all before Diana. Not to mention, he dedicated his whole life to service to the crown and was not about to throw it away for one troublemaker.
@@clearsky4003 Charles still played the game of being in the royal family and was one of the four children Philip had a responsibility to, especially being the heir
so condescending to her
============================
A buzzard over Kensington Palace?
============================
I know I'm in the minority here about the actress portraying Diana, but I think she plays Diana more like a caricature than a real person. She's got the voice right, but too much head down but with eyes up and pouting all the time.
She portrayed her perfectly. Vile, petulant creature.
I wasn't keen either. You hit the nail with the word caricature 👌
He was one of the few people that could've actually saved her from literally getting murdered... But didn't
She wasn't murdered.
@@frname7665murdered by the homicidal royal family
@@frname7665murdered by the homicidaI royaI famiIy
@@frname7665yes she was
@@lrmn3492 No. She hopped in a car with a drunk Al Fayed driver driving at unbelievable speeds. What do you think happens in these situations?
The actress here, didn't look like or act like Diana.
Yes, unfortunately she did. The vile creature came back to life temporarily.
If they would have hired someone for the "princess of whales" job. That would have been better and she would be alive now. Or Charles and Diana could have stayed as FRIENDS for the position/title and Duty for the country till William becomes big and takes up the crown after marrying an EU aristocratic princess , after that Charles and Diana could have got divorced and married whoever they LOVED.
Diana was foolish and cooperative.
ridiculous she has to curtsy to him in private
@@JoanMorrison-vq2jcthe crown is not supposed to get things right. As always mentioned is fictional
As I understand it, hierarchy of royalty first, family member second. If they can't respect the positions, who can. Lead by example.
Diana 😅😅😅🤮🤮🤮