Siskel & Ebert (1993): Rudy, A Life in the Theatre, Mr. Jones, Gettysburg & Farwell, My Concubine

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
  • 0:00 intro
    0:50 Rudy: 👍👍
    4:29 A Life in the Theatre: Siskel 👎 & Ebert 👍
    7:30 Mr. Jones: 👍👍
    11:20 Gettysburg: Siskel 👎 & Ebert 👍
    15:30 Farwell, My Concubine: 👍👍
    18:45 Video pick of the week: ALADDIN (1992)
    19:19 The reviews

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @davidthieroff9452
    @davidthieroff9452 3 роки тому +17

    Jeff Daniels should've been nominated for Gettysburg. Siskel is right. He is the highlight.

    • @adamfrisk956
      @adamfrisk956 Рік тому

      I think Tom Berenger did a hell of job as well, especially with his Picket charge confirmation

    • @matthewschwartz6607
      @matthewschwartz6607 Рік тому

      @@adamfrisk956 - He is supposed to be a history buff (Berenger.). He later got a big role in the history show Hatfield And The Mccoys

  • @danorthsidemang3834
    @danorthsidemang3834 2 роки тому +6

    Richard Jordan should have been (posthumously) nominated for AND won Best Supporting Actor for his portrayal of Armistead in Gettysburg.

  • @JoeyArmstrong2800
    @JoeyArmstrong2800 3 роки тому +8

    Even amongst all the fake beards, Jeff Daniels should have been nominated for an academy. Gettysburg is a good movie.

  • @reneedennis2011
    @reneedennis2011 3 роки тому +7

    I haven't seen this episode. Thank you for uploading this!

    • @Jbaxter85
      @Jbaxter85  2 роки тому +3

      My pleasure, Watch Rudy & Farwell, My Concubine, both great 👍

  • @Jbaxter85
    @Jbaxter85  3 роки тому +2

    Farewell, My Concubine, Ruby & Mr. Jones are great movies 👍👍🌟🌟🌟🌟

  • @kakashi101able
    @kakashi101able 3 роки тому +6

    Good movie especially for civil war buff, but sadly for the general public may not enjoy this movie as much, that may be why Gettysburg didn't do to well in the box office.

    • @kakashi101able
      @kakashi101able 3 роки тому

      Not to say your average person wouldn't like it, because the movie was well made.

    • @mastermonarch
      @mastermonarch 3 роки тому +1

      @@kakashi101able Gettysburg was better than Gods and Generals but thats like saying the 💩i took this morning was better than the 💩 i took yesterday ....

    • @zxbc1
      @zxbc1 2 роки тому +1

      @@mastermonarch This is a very accurate description of the two movies :D

  • @reneperez7903
    @reneperez7903 3 роки тому +3

    Rudy 👍⭐️⭐️⭐️ & a half out of 4

  • @bigjohn08865
    @bigjohn08865 3 роки тому +2

    RUDY is a classic movie.

  • @danorthsidemang3834
    @danorthsidemang3834 3 роки тому +7

    Dammit, Gene...

  • @AaronJohnson-mo8rf
    @AaronJohnson-mo8rf Рік тому

    mr jones is clearly the rom - drama favorite of this review
    richard gere is terrific
    while gettysburg is a fun action drama that people can watch
    and it has a remarkable score by randy edelman, the same composer who composes many great movie and tv themes,
    one of them, aside from gettysburg from back in the 90s, that many people recognize edelman for
    is the Macgyver theme music, as well as beethoven and many others
    jeff daniels shouldve gotten a award for gettysburg
    and randy edelman shouldve gotten a oscar nomination for composing gettysburg

  • @j5eze
    @j5eze 4 місяці тому

    Both Jeff Daniels and Richard Jordan should've been nominated for Best Supporting Actor in their roles. While I disagree with Mr. Siskel that this film has a Confederate slant, I can understand why he comes to that conclusion.
    For generations, the Lost Cause dominated historical narrative not only classrooms but throughout the nation and in Hollywood. The old saying "History is written by the victors" does not apply to the American Civil War. While the Union won the war, the Confederates won the war of historical narrative, until recently.

  • @jimmers112
    @jimmers112 Рік тому

    Totally disagree with Siskel on his take, like he took his bias in with white watching. I saw no particular slant toward either side in this movie

  • @lanemeyer9350
    @lanemeyer9350 Рік тому +1

    Gene Siskel with a typical liberal take on Gettysburg, so predictable 🙄
    There was NO southern slant whatsoever, he’s just pissed that the movie was purely objective

    • @Mythologos
      @Mythologos Рік тому +1

      Nothing's changed.

    • @insightdream6251
      @insightdream6251 4 місяці тому

      Typical bigoted prejudiced racist take on Gettysburg- so predictable 🙄
      Ebert likes the film on its merits. You liked it for it’s subject matter. Horrifying, but hey, you want the south to rise again, right?

  • @jacobmullett4002
    @jacobmullett4002 Рік тому

    Glory was northern propaganda

    • @j5eze
      @j5eze 4 місяці тому

      For generations southern propaganda known as the Lost Cause dominated historical narrative. Far more southern propaganda has made it to Hollywood than Union. "Glory" was just a refresher.