Awesome!!! I would ask you to do Chalmers next (What is This Thing Called Science), but I can see that you have done Kuhn because you show that it is, largely, a book about history and, as such, belongs on this channel. Regarding your final question, I think that any scientist can be improved by also becoming a Natural Philosopher. It may not affect their data collection and daily routine, but I do think it stands a chance of altering their processing of those data and overall consideration of them. It becomes sort of a , 'Can't hurt; might help' situation.
Thank you. As you say I'm reluctant to wander too far from my own expertise. I think even Popper would be too far as he firmly begins and ends as a philosopher.
You should report on your experience. I've never read them back to back or even in close proximity so have never really compared them directly in that sense.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Awesome!!! I would ask you to do Chalmers next (What is This Thing Called Science), but I can see that you have done Kuhn because you show that it is, largely, a book about history and, as such, belongs on this channel.
Regarding your final question, I think that any scientist can be improved by also becoming a Natural Philosopher. It may not affect their data collection and daily routine, but I do think it stands a chance of altering their processing of those data and overall consideration of them. It becomes sort of a , 'Can't hurt; might help' situation.
Thank you. As you say I'm reluctant to wander too far from my own expertise. I think even Popper would be too far as he firmly begins and ends as a philosopher.
A good precis of Kuhn.
I am half way through Popper and have Kuhn checked out.
You should report on your experience. I've never read them back to back or even in close proximity so have never really compared them directly in that sense.