they were industrialized and industrialization has nothing to do with steam engine or technologies it's a way of manufacturing products in an manner where it's not considered artisanal. you know what chain production is??? they had that thousands of years ago when they were producing the mud bricks to construct the first city ever UR.
I think it's the other way around. If an industrial revolution had occurred in the Roman Empire, it would have increased the propaganda of the emperor and the Romans as a nation. Taking into account the success of classical Romanization and new propaganda, she made it so that everyone in the empire began to be called Romans. In addition, propaganda could create patriotic soldiers who care more about Rome than money
If the empire were to fracture due to the upheaval of the roman way of life from industrialization, then it could be possible for it to reform into some kind of Roman federation as a new representative government is formed to replace the imperial government and the railways are used to reunite parts of the empire, thus leading to Roman history following a cycle similar to the one in Chinese history.
Great video, and you've got a great voice. I'm not an expert, I'm still a student of audio, but I do know with a few easy touches this audio would sound truly incredible, cinematic even with your voice. I look forward to more content. Thanks :)
Only thing is Rome was trading with China. The big thing here is they could go by sea possibly saving a huge chunk of time. However, China likely still discovers gun powder which likely gets into the hands of the Romans. I don't think it would split apart so easily. I think there is a strong likely hood of a Constitutional Monarch or just making it a republic as all the resources of each area matter to the elites. It just would be reverting back to a republic rather then just split up. Also, if that is the case Italy remains being called Rome. Which Rome never really falls in this timeline. I don't see the migration happening as much given the new defenses of the Romans and ability to adapt to changing conditions as it has solved the food issues and their plagues likely might be better taken care of. The Romans wouldn't have gone for the New World as it would have no real reason to until later if at all. If they can go through Egypt which is part of the Empire and get to Asia. There is no reason to go around Africa. They would be perfectly happy in their area unless they found something else they needed as far as materials.
However, if the huns were to still cause a refugee crisis, then it may be necessary for Rome to establish immigration policies that may pave the way for the germanic tribes to gain citizenship and assimilate into the Roman culture.
video extremamente bom :D nao me canso de ver e quero saber como um canal com uma ediçao tao boa nao tem tanto reconhecimento esse video e cinema praticamente haha eu acho que o imperio se manteria,possivelmente a crise economica seria consertada e como os romanos nao so teriam uma populaçao maior mais uma tecnologia que os colocaria a alguns milhares de anos no futuro eles destroçariam qualquer ameaça como os hunos haha possivelmente de imigraçoes seriam mais refugiados que tentariam entrar justamente como cidadoes romanos :D
You got roman state all wrong. The emperor was NOT a monarch. A tyrant maybe, but not a hereditary monarch. The romans abhorred the very idea of a king.
Not gonna watch the description and the comments already prove to me you don't know what INDUSTRY means so industrialization is not what you people think ROMANS WERE INDUSTRIALIZED THEY HAD INDUSTRIES THAT PRODUCED GOODS AND THEY PROFITED FROM THOSE INDUSTRIES. WAR was an industry for the Romans they produced weapons in a chain production manner with every worker performing a different part of the weapons. they produced pottery in private industries again with chain production type ways of manufacturing their products. some of you mistake steam engine with industrialization and that is just funny
Just because the roman empire had industries doesn't really mean what you are insinuating. Search up the process of industrialization & the industrial revolution before commenting. :)
But it not last long because of internal conflict, Barbarian Invasion, threat in the east, economical problem, and other things that can destabilize the empire.
The Roman Empire did industrialize, at the twilight years of it's rule. The Ottoman Empire was the continuation of the Roman state and Sultan Abdul Hamid instituted the Tanzimat reforms in the late 1800s to turn the empire into an economic rival of Britain and the USA.
Hello everyone, I had to reupload this video due to some copyright issues!
No problema, your videos are still very entertaining
they were industrialized and industrialization has nothing to do with steam engine or technologies
it's a way of manufacturing products in an manner where it's not considered artisanal.
you know what chain production is??? they had that thousands of years ago when they were producing the mud bricks to construct the first city ever UR.
Roman weapons:
1. Steam cannons
2. Automatic crossbows
That would be incredible
I think it's the other way around. If an industrial revolution had occurred in the Roman Empire, it would have increased the propaganda of the emperor and the Romans as a nation. Taking into account the success of classical Romanization and new propaganda, she made it so that everyone in the empire began to be called Romans. In addition, propaganda could create patriotic soldiers who care more about Rome than money
Well irl nationalism rise when industrialization happened indeed
most underrated alt history yt
If the empire were to fracture due to the upheaval of the roman way of life from industrialization, then it could be possible for it to reform into some kind of Roman federation as a new representative government is formed to replace the imperial government and the railways are used to reunite parts of the empire, thus leading to Roman history following a cycle similar to the one in Chinese history.
Agreed 👍
They had to have been industrialized to construct megaliths so Locomotives were often mislabeled as "Battering Rams" or as "Phallic Sculptures".
Great video, and you've got a great voice. I'm not an expert, I'm still a student of audio, but I do know with a few easy touches this audio would sound truly incredible, cinematic even with your voice. I look forward to more content. Thanks :)
What if Theodore Roosevelt ran for a 3rd term instead of nominating Taft?
Only thing is Rome was trading with China. The big thing here is they could go by sea possibly saving a huge chunk of time. However, China likely still discovers gun powder which likely gets into the hands of the Romans. I don't think it would split apart so easily. I think there is a strong likely hood of a Constitutional Monarch or just making it a republic as all the resources of each area matter to the elites. It just would be reverting back to a republic rather then just split up. Also, if that is the case Italy remains being called Rome. Which Rome never really falls in this timeline. I don't see the migration happening as much given the new defenses of the Romans and ability to adapt to changing conditions as it has solved the food issues and their plagues likely might be better taken care of. The Romans wouldn't have gone for the New World as it would have no real reason to until later if at all. If they can go through Egypt which is part of the Empire and get to Asia. There is no reason to go around Africa. They would be perfectly happy in their area unless they found something else they needed as far as materials.
However, if the huns were to still cause a refugee crisis, then it may be necessary for Rome to establish immigration policies that may pave the way for the germanic tribes to gain citizenship and assimilate into the Roman culture.
Be something along the lines of steam punk maybe steam.powered arrow machine weapons
Amazing video! Can you do what if the caliphate conquered Constantinople and won battle of Tours
video extremamente bom :D nao me canso de ver e quero saber como um canal com uma ediçao tao boa nao tem tanto reconhecimento
esse video e cinema praticamente haha
eu acho que o imperio se manteria,possivelmente a crise economica seria consertada e como os romanos nao so teriam uma populaçao maior mais uma tecnologia que os colocaria a alguns milhares de anos no futuro eles destroçariam qualquer ameaça como os hunos haha
possivelmente de imigraçoes seriam mais refugiados que tentariam entrar justamente como cidadoes romanos :D
Thank you!
For the algorithm again!
nice thumbnail
As an Italian, i'm so pround for my ancienstors
I think Persia would be destroyed after 100 years to link with China and to defeat their new rival
A perfect world doesn't exist
Don't act like you're smart
My god its just so damn beautiful
i think your end with china is a Little bit exagerated because the han empire china never wanted to conquer the world
It was more for the dramatic effect.
Edit: Though I am surprised someone notice that it was Han China in the video :)
Rome wound colonize kleper by 1800
amazing
What if the Mongol Empire lasted longer?
More destruction, same end.
@@ilmaio But Genhis Khan was a good person, he improved the areas he took over.
@@GeorgeRamsey22 Hitler did also improve the science and technology but did it make him good?
You got roman state all wrong. The emperor was NOT a monarch. A tyrant maybe, but not a hereditary monarch. The romans abhorred the very idea of a king.
What about the Chinese Civilization.
Not gonna watch the description and the comments already prove to me you don't know what INDUSTRY means so industrialization is not what you people think
ROMANS WERE INDUSTRIALIZED THEY HAD INDUSTRIES THAT PRODUCED GOODS AND THEY PROFITED FROM THOSE INDUSTRIES.
WAR was an industry for the Romans
they produced weapons in a chain production manner with every worker performing a different part of the weapons.
they produced pottery in private industries again with chain production type ways of manufacturing their products.
some of you mistake steam engine with industrialization and that is just funny
Just because the roman empire had industries doesn't really mean what you are insinuating. Search up the process of industrialization & the industrial revolution before commenting. :)
Based
How would the romans master boilers though?
But it not last long because of internal conflict, Barbarian Invasion, threat in the east, economical problem, and other things that can destabilize the empire.
in this timeline, they have a stable and strong roman goverment which had an ability to industrilize
The Roman Empire did industrialize, at the twilight years of it's rule. The Ottoman Empire was the continuation of the Roman state and Sultan Abdul Hamid instituted the Tanzimat reforms in the late 1800s to turn the empire into an economic rival of Britain and the USA.
Nope.