Yellow Rose of Texas - CONFEDERATE SONG - Southland

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @carlvieira9649
    @carlvieira9649 5 років тому +33

    There's nuthin better than my big ol State....
    Proud Texan born and raised.
    Howdy from Dallas.

    • @Alaska_567
      @Alaska_567 3 роки тому +2

      The next Confederate Capital will be Houston!

    • @calebalexanderwhite1601
      @calebalexanderwhite1601 2 роки тому

      @@Alaska_567 President? Why aren't you in Houston getting for the coup ?

    • @Ainz_Ooal_Gown_of_Nazarick
      @Ainz_Ooal_Gown_of_Nazarick 4 місяці тому

      @@Alaska_567Both houston and dallas are mexican colonies 😂

  • @sam-dz2ee
    @sam-dz2ee Рік тому +5

    Lyrics:
    There's a yellow rose in Texas, that I am going to see
    No other soldier knows her, no soldier, only me
    She cried so when I left her, it liked to broke my heart
    And if I ever find her, we never move apart
    Chorus:
    She's the sweetest rose of color the soldier ever knew
    Her eyes are bright as diamonds, they sparkle like the dew
    You may talk about your dearest May and sing of Rosalie
    But the yellow rose of Texas beats the bells of Tennessee
    When the Rio Grande is flowing the starry skies are bright
    She walks along the river in the quiet summer night
    She thinks if I remember when we parted long ago
    I promise to come back again and not to leave her so
    Chorus
    And now I'm going southward, my heart is full of woe
    I'm going back to Georgia to find my uncle Joe
    Who may talk about your Beauregard and sing of Bobby Lee
    But the gallant hood of Texas played hell in Tennessee
    Chorus x2
    But the yellow rose of Texas beats the bells of Tennessee

  • @brianrunyon266
    @brianrunyon266 4 роки тому +20

    Great take. Nice how you added the verse about the Confederate Army of Tennessee.

  • @Pansexual_Pratt
    @Pansexual_Pratt Рік тому +4

    Oh god this is the best version of Yellow rose of Texas I've ever heard

  • @diegodelamata2435
    @diegodelamata2435 6 років тому +11

    Great version as always!

  • @The_unforgiven2
    @The_unforgiven2 Рік тому +1

    Hello from Texas

  • @marymcgivney9041
    @marymcgivney9041 3 роки тому +6

    Perfect song for me love this song and the way goes 😃💚🤍🧡

  • @1963felonee
    @1963felonee 6 років тому +13

    Great version can y'all do Rose of Alabamy or the Battle Cry of Freedom

  • @WitchHunterSiegfried
    @WitchHunterSiegfried 3 місяці тому

    My favorite version of the song bar none!

  • @libertybattalion9069
    @libertybattalion9069 3 роки тому +4

    nice rendition brandon

  • @leopainkiller
    @leopainkiller 6 років тому +5

    wonderful!
    battle cry of freedom please

    • @southland2424
      @southland2424  6 років тому +3

      We just might be working on something like that right now...

  • @ulfr3297
    @ulfr3297 6 років тому +2

    What a beauty

  • @theandyman88
    @theandyman88 4 роки тому +4

    Do the war song of North Carolina

  • @MGTOWPaladin
    @MGTOWPaladin 2 роки тому +5

    Let me see here!
    A Union of States where slavery is enshrined in its US constitution (Migration and Importantion Clause, Fugitive Slave Clause. 3/5 Compromise Clause, 4th Amendment, 5th Amendment and 10th Amendment. Also in the laws of its Congress: i.e.1820 Missouri Compromise, 1850 Fugitive Slave Act and 1854 Kansas - Nebrasks Act, etc. and SCOTUS decisions like Dred Scott v Sanford) invades a Confederation of States to STOP SLAVERY? HUH?
    Why is there a controversy?
    As South Carolina and other States legally seceded from the Union, the North invaded the now-Confederacy for control of southern cash crops that fed the US Treasury (to the tune of 70%), secured bank loans as collateral, supplied northern industries with raw materials and, across the Atlantic, supplied their industries (The Industrial Revolution) as well.
    Three non-Confederate Sources:
    English author, Charles Dickens, author of A Christmas Carol and Oliver Twist:
    "The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control ( cotton and other raw materials) of the Southern states."
    This short telegram, from US General William Tecumseh Sherman to Abraham Lincoln, is dated December 22, 1864. “I beg to present you as a Christmas gift the city of Savannah with 150 heavy guns and plenty of ammunition and also about 25,000 bales of COTTON,” Sherman wrote.
    In 1924, the US Federal Reserve issued their report on the History of Cotton. Please note in 1800 there was no cotton production. By 1850, COTTON supplied 53.36% of the US exports. By 1870, COTTON supplied a whopping 60.28%.
    fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/FRB/pages/1920-1924/26396_1920-1924.pdf
    The North invaded the Confederacy for control of southern cash crops and the money it supplied.
    For 160 years, the North has hid behind Four False Causes or UNCONSTITUTIONAL LIES!
    1. Secession is illegal
    2. The South rebelled
    3. Preserve the Union (Treasury)
    4. Slavery - legal under the Constitution, Congress and SCOTUS.
    The ONLY document from the US government about the war on (Confederate-only) SLAVERY is the Emancipation Proclamation!
    PROBLEMS? Lincoln acknowledged in his first inaugural that he has no constitutional authority on the subject of slavery and copying from the 1860 Republican Party Platform plank# 4 says its a situation of the inviolable rights of the States and the armed invasion of any State FOR ANY REASON is the GRAVEST IF CRIMES!
    The Emancipation Proclamation did not free a single slave still held in the North or the Southern States (Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri kept from joining the CSA, and the Confederate State of Tennessee was exempt (unlisted) thanks to Lincoln's Vice President, Andrew Johnson.
    So, Lincoln's invasion is the costliest in US history. It's supposedly about slavery yet slavery continues to be legal in the US for EIGHT MONTHS after the surrender at Appomattox in April 1865.
    Can anyone make sense of this?

    • @fridericusrex1153
      @fridericusrex1153 Рік тому

      The North invaded the South because the South shelled Fort Sumter.

    • @MGTOWPaladin
      @MGTOWPaladin Рік тому +2

      @fridericusrex1153 *REALLY?*
      South Carolina legally seceded (no longer a part of the Union but a free, independent, and sovereign country) as of 20 December 1860.
      Six days later, 26 Dec 1860, WITHOUT A TREATY, an "ARMED FORCE" of the US moves from Ft Moultrie on the Atlantic Coast, INDER THE COVER OF NIGHT, to the "unfinished" Ft Sumter in Charleston Harbor and settles in.
      The May 1860 Republic Party Platform Plank # 4 stated the following, and Lincoln copied it as paragraph # 6 of his 1st Inaugural Speech.
      "Resolved, That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States, and especially the right of each State to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to that balance of power on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depend; *AND WE DENOUNCE THE LAWLESS INVASION BY ARMED FORCE OF THE SOIL OF ANY STATE or Territory, NO MATTER WHAT PRETEXT, AS AMONG THE GRAVEST OF CRIMES."*
      For 3-1/2 months, the foreign country of South Carolina asked the US "politely" to remove its invasion force from their land and the US refused. When South Carolina drove the invaders off their land, Lincoln wrote the following as to WHY the Union ILLEGALLY INVADED the country of South Carolina.
      Lincoln's Presidential Proclamation NO. 81, April 19, 1861 (five days after Ft Sumter).
      "Whereas an insurrection (Tax Revolt) against the Government of the United States has broken out in the States of South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, and the laws of the United States *FOR THE COLLECTION OF THE REVENUE (TAX MONEY)* can not be effectually executed therein conformably to that provision of the Constitution *WHICH REQUIRES DUTIES (REVENUE TAX MONEY) TO BE UNIFORM THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES;* and......."
      Lincoln admittedly wanted to TAX countries that were no longer part of the Union, countries over which he had no recognized authority. Lincoln, as a lawyer, knew secession was legal constitutionally, so he NEVER refers to the Southern States withdraw from the Union as ILLEGAL. He simply never refers to it and ignores it as if they never seceded!
      Abraham Lincoln, US Congressman, 12 January 1848 on the floor of the US House of Representatives:
      "Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and for a new one that suits them better. *THIS IS A MOST VALUABLE, - A MOST SACRED RIGHT - a RIGHT,* which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world. Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing government, may choose to exercise it."

    • @fridericusrex1153
      @fridericusrex1153 Рік тому

      @@MGTOWPaladin You say they legally seceded? Based on which law was this legal? Was there a approval in congress?

    • @MGTOWPaladin
      @MGTOWPaladin Рік тому

      @fridericusrex1153 Ever hear of the 9th and 10th Amendments? The US Constitution is the Emplotees Handbook for the Federal Government.
      It creates, defines, empowers, and restricts the federal government. To allow the federal government to operate as an AGENT OF THE STATES, the States set up boundaries for the federal government. To allow the federal government to operate freely, the STATES enacted limits on themselves.
      These limits are found in the THREE CLAUSES of Article 1 Section 10, and each clause starts with "STATES CAN NOT." The power of secession is NOT RESTRICTED in that section.
      So, according to the 9th and 10th Amendments, ANY POWER not listed (enumerated) in the Constitution is RESERVED to the States or the People.
      Or, as Abraham Lincoln said:
      Abraham Lincoln, US Congressman, 12 January 1848 on the floor of the US House of Representatives:
      "Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and for a new one that suits them better. *THIS IS A MOST VALUABLE, - A MOST SACRED RIGHT - a RIGHT,* which we hope and believe is to liberate the world. Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing government may choose to exercise it."
      So, according to the US Constitution and lawyer Abraham Lincoln, secession is a LEGAL RIGHT of the States.
      Even the SCOTUS, in 1869, couldn't find a "law" against secession, so they "frankensteined" some words and phrases and, like Lincoln, violated the Constitution in their ruling (Texas v White)!

    • @fridericusrex1153
      @fridericusrex1153 Рік тому +1

      @@MGTOWPaladin Lets say that the secession was legal. Still, Fort Sumter was federal property. Shelling it was an act of war.

  • @paulomartinsferreiramartin5867
    @paulomartinsferreiramartin5867 2 роки тому +1

    Muito linda

  • @JesusFollower500
    @JesusFollower500 Рік тому +1

    Did nearly all y'alls videos get removed?

  • @dominiclee1471
    @dominiclee1471 Місяць тому

    Never forget the Alamo

  • @ARandomTexan
    @ARandomTexan 2 роки тому

    This isn’t confederate!!

  • @marcokuck5903
    @marcokuck5903 5 років тому +1

    Rassic on Top!

  • @marcokuck5903
    @marcokuck5903 5 років тому +3

    We are lovely rassic of ku-kux-klan

    • @SubidubidubiDu1
      @SubidubidubiDu1 4 роки тому +7

      Ever heard of Heritage not Hate?

    • @nobodynobodys3828
      @nobodynobodys3828 3 роки тому +5

      Ku Klux Klan is ran by the federals, it's meant to continue the poor reception of the Confederacy. Look at the Confederacy then and it's supporters now, and their values are completely different

    • @doc4098
      @doc4098 3 роки тому +2

      Yk this song is about a black woman right..

    • @5.7moy
      @5.7moy 3 роки тому

      The kkk is violently anti Catholic. There were many Catholics fighting for the confederacy. The Kkk is hypocritical

    • @buddy4445
      @buddy4445 2 роки тому +1

      @@doc4098 Oh true that negates the whole slavery thing