Great video but I would like to make some corrections please. Water was seen on G deck and the squash court flooded at 12:05 which is accurate and seen in the video. However, E deck starts to flood too late. Ij the video, it showed it starting to flood at 12:30 on E deck but Laura Francatelli reported water on the corridor on E deck at 12:15 - 12:20. John Poingdestre said that, at roughy, 12:20, while he was in his quarters. The wooden bulkhead between his quarters and third class spaces in the starboard side in-line with the forecastle area 2 decks above collapsed and 3 feet of icy water entered his quarters. At 12:45, it showed water being at D deck but, 30 minutes later, at 1:15, George Synoms recalled the portholes beneath the nameplate going under as they left. However, you showed at 1:15, water being on the forecastle well deck, which more likely flooded 35 minutes later as testified by Bridge. It showed water being at the nameplate and on the forward end of C deck at 1:15 but George McGough in Boat 9 said water wasn’t at the name plate but below. Since the port list didn’t grow then, the name plate on the starboard side would be in the water and McGough would not testify it was above. At 1:15, it showed water being on the forward well deck but Bride said he was told it was awash at 1;50. It also showed the bow being under and water in B deck at 1:30. However, Emily Ryseron in Boat 4 said that, at 1:55, as they were pulling away, A deck was 20 feet from the sea, if B deck was flooding then, it would be less. The video also showed the bow being under by 1:30 but Arthur Bright in Boat D said it was submerging when they left between 2:05 and 2:10. Those in C also said was above water when they left but under when they were at the water. The video also showed water being on A deck at 1:45 and the Boat deck at 2:05. However, Lightoller and Woolner said it was 10 feet from sea when they left which is corroborated by Arthur Brights testimony of the forecastle going under when they left. Woolner and Steffanson both jumped from A deck which had began to flood onto Boat D when it was at the water but if water was at the bridge then, this wouldn’t be possible. If the bridge began to flood At 2:05, then this would either mean the ship being stationary for 11 minutes till plunge began. Or the plunge would be unrealistically slow. However, witnesses say it was very fast, less than a minute from even keel to break. Great video though, sorry for any offence, no offence meant,just wanted to give some corrections. I know this is from a year ago but incase it hasn’t changed. Sorry for any offence, no offences meant.
my adhd brain loves the randomness of these deep dives. Should be working but NAH gotta watch a vid explaining the section times of the titanic flooding.
1:25 - Where the hole was created. There was no single hole instead it was a series of buckled shell-plates and parted seams with a few small holes, the total amount damage is estimated to have been 12 square-feet (The area of an adults shadow).
About everything up to D deck or so is right but after that things slow down for about 45 minutes. The water wouldn't have came over the Well Deck until about 1:30 - 1:45 am that's when things were starting to speed up. Having the water progressively move up just about every 15 minutes above around D Deck isn't how Titanic sank. From about 12:40-1:30 Titanic didn't really go down that much maybe about one deck or so but after that the pace incrementally increased.
This channel is a roller coaster
As a Titanic buff, I appreciate your videos on it. I’ve never seen a flooding breakdown like this on any of the Titanic channels. So good job.
Great video but I would like to make some corrections please.
Water was seen on G deck and the squash court flooded at 12:05 which is accurate and seen in the video. However, E deck starts to flood too late. Ij the video, it showed it starting to flood at 12:30 on E deck but Laura Francatelli reported water on the corridor on E deck at 12:15 - 12:20. John Poingdestre said that, at roughy, 12:20, while he was in his quarters. The wooden bulkhead between his quarters and third class spaces in the starboard side in-line with the forecastle area 2 decks above collapsed and 3 feet of icy water entered his quarters.
At 12:45, it showed water being at D deck but, 30 minutes later, at 1:15, George Synoms recalled the portholes beneath the nameplate going under as they left. However, you showed at 1:15, water being on the forecastle well deck, which more likely flooded 35 minutes later as testified by Bridge.
It showed water being at the nameplate and on the forward end of C deck at 1:15 but George McGough in Boat 9 said water wasn’t at the name plate but below. Since the port list didn’t grow then, the name plate on the starboard side would be in the water and McGough would not testify it was above.
At 1:15, it showed water being on the forward well deck but Bride said he was told it was awash at 1;50. It also showed the bow being under and water in B deck at 1:30. However, Emily Ryseron in Boat 4 said that, at 1:55, as they were pulling away, A deck was 20 feet from the sea, if B deck was flooding then, it would be less.
The video also showed the bow being under by 1:30 but Arthur Bright in Boat D said it was submerging when they left between 2:05 and 2:10. Those in C also said was above water when they left but under when they were at the water.
The video also showed water being on A deck at 1:45 and the Boat deck at 2:05. However, Lightoller and Woolner said it was 10 feet from sea when they left which is corroborated by Arthur Brights testimony of the forecastle going under when they left. Woolner and Steffanson both jumped from A deck which had began to flood onto Boat D when it was at the water but if water was at the bridge then, this wouldn’t be possible.
If the bridge began to flood At 2:05, then this would either mean the ship being stationary for 11 minutes till plunge began. Or the plunge would be unrealistically slow. However, witnesses say it was very fast, less than a minute from even keel to break.
Great video though, sorry for any offence, no offence meant,just wanted to give some corrections. I know this is from a year ago but incase it hasn’t changed. Sorry for any offence, no offences meant.
my adhd brain loves the randomness of these deep dives. Should be working but NAH gotta watch a vid explaining the section times of the titanic flooding.
1:25 - Where the hole was created. There was no single hole instead it was a series of buckled shell-plates and parted seams with a few small holes, the total amount damage is estimated to have been 12 square-feet (The area of an adults shadow).
You should do a video ranking MLB stadium backstops
About everything up to D deck or so is right but after that things slow down for about 45 minutes. The water wouldn't have came over the Well Deck until about 1:30 - 1:45 am that's when things were starting to speed up. Having the water progressively move up just about every 15 minutes above around D Deck isn't how Titanic sank. From about 12:40-1:30 Titanic didn't really go down that much maybe about one deck or so but after that the pace incrementally increased.
I wish he would have done this in real time from the F deck. We could have avoided 110 years of his voice!
the first class canteen starts filling with water at 01:50. the front of the ship begins to descend into the water at 01:37
Very cool
Water entered at a rate of 7 tons per second !!!
When did the Parlour suites and Staterooms B-57/B-58 started flooding?
I think B-57 and B-58 were located in the break-up zone
Are you talking the Cameron movie the list was there go back and watch the movie.
Oh god…comic sans font and everything. His entire knowledge is based on a movie. More third class cabins….cluck cluck….more third class cabins…