Machine Guns - WW1 Uncut: Dan Snow

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2014
  • Subscribe and 🔔 to the BBC 👉 bit.ly/BBCUA-camSub
    Watch the BBC first on iPlayer 👉 bbc.in/iPlayer-Home www.bbc.co.uk/ww1 Dan takes a deep breath as he prepares to have an extremely close encounter with some of the deadliest weapons of the war in an attempt to understand how they were able to wreak such havoc.
    #bbc
    All our TV channels and S4C are available to watch live through BBC iPlayer, although some programmes may not be available to stream online due to rights. If you would like to read more on what types of programmes are available to watch live, check the 'Are all programmes that are broadcast available on BBC iPlayer?' FAQ 👉 bbc.in/2m8ks6v.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 893

  • @MarsFKA
    @MarsFKA 4 роки тому +355

    The Lewis gun was so reliable that a variant of it was used by Imperial Stormtroopers long ago, in a galaxy far far away....

  • @ralfpetitt713
    @ralfpetitt713 7 років тому +534

    ahh, you hear that? no Skrillex for once...

  • @mozzatron
    @mozzatron 4 роки тому +75

    0:34 we watched this in school with the CC on...Class nearly had a laughing fit 😂

  • @tooyoungtobeold8756
    @tooyoungtobeold8756 6 років тому +25

    My grandfather was a Lewis gunner in WW1, aged 19 at Ypres and later, on the Somme. He only mentioned it a couple of times.

  • @brianfuller7691
    @brianfuller7691 4 роки тому +32

    The Vickers was an improved Maxim and had a solid legacy until it's final retirement. The Lewis was an awesome piece. It's utter reliability and versatility kept it in service until the Korean War. In WW2, it was still used even after being replaced by the Bren and the Vickers K.

  • @aurel9684
    @aurel9684 8 років тому +722

    This show has a serious problem when it comes to the background music...

    • @keeganpaullanzillotta5584
      @keeganpaullanzillotta5584 8 років тому +23

      This clip is much better than the other ones

    • @letsgoBrandon204
      @letsgoBrandon204 8 років тому +3

      That's Dan Snow. Jon Snow is his uncle. What's wrong with him?

    • @denormal9580
      @denormal9580 7 років тому +15

      Massive Attack is a big step up for them. Still hugely unfitting but at least not ear-rape.

    • @cole2680
      @cole2680 7 років тому +2

      its like they think its a music video hahahahahaha

    • @tetrisgamer728
      @tetrisgamer728 7 років тому

      Aurel if anything the worst was either the rifles or the kit one that made feel like a video on MTV

  • @prpunk187
    @prpunk187 4 роки тому +15

    4:28 armorer is still feeding the rounds like why did u stop u still got a whole belt

  • @dylanmilne6683
    @dylanmilne6683 8 років тому +75

    As a cool and hip youngstar of da strreets you have reely coneected wit me with dat music. well done bbc you is reeem.

  • @Archris17
    @Archris17 8 років тому +344

    It's funny to look at the difference between American and British shows about weapons. In America, they whoop it up going, "YEEEAAH! Look at the rate of fire on this bad boy! Man that can do some damage! Awesome!" whereas in the BBC, the presenters are much more like, "This is a truly terrifying piece of equipment and it's horrific to think of just how much pain and death it was responsible for, in such miserable conditions." Really shows the different culture and national experiences with war and weapons.

    • @cottonballs185
      @cottonballs185 8 років тому +21

      Equipment being responsible for death? Trust me, there's plenty of Americans who believe that too.

    • @bassman3235
      @bassman3235 8 років тому +29

      At least concerning WW1 the US didn't lose as close as many troops that France and Britain did.So they may think of the war in a more 'fun' way.

    • @Archris17
      @Archris17 7 років тому +6

      You seem upset. Did I touch a nerve?

    • @2skip29
      @2skip29 7 років тому +7

      few people here think of war as fun.

    • @rockacraig5653
      @rockacraig5653 7 років тому +1

      Well they were in it for 1 year of actual fighting. I know they joined in 1917 but they started fighting after the German offensive of 1918 so of course they lost fewer people.

  • @sweyswey6462
    @sweyswey6462 5 років тому +38

    All of these videos in a nutshell: “The german thing is alright but look heres the same thing but british, that means its better.“

    • @manofthepeople4663
      @manofthepeople4663 3 роки тому +2

      It says in it that the vickers was lighter and it didn't brake down as often

    • @isaachitchcock7113
      @isaachitchcock7113 3 роки тому +5

      No the vickers didnt brake down at all

    • @Harperslj
      @Harperslj 2 роки тому +1

      Can’t help that we were better prepared…

  • @Jim73
    @Jim73 7 років тому +217

    All of these WW1 Uncut videos have really bizarre and annoying music and editing choices. The last one I saw featured dub step, even in the video editing.

    • @minder01
      @minder01 7 років тому +11

      Jim Novak also they have miss information,
      Everything brittish is somehow the best.

    • @Jeff9691
      @Jeff9691 7 років тому +2

      Well it is on BBC.. but if you listen to their WW2 stuff, they give a lot of tech superiority to the Germans, Tanks, Machine Guns, ect..

    • @minder01
      @minder01 7 років тому +1

      Jeffrey Rose well,it's because it's quite known that German tech was superior in that era,not a lot was known if it was like that in ww1 so BBC could have used that to spread miss-information.

    • @hoxhabunker8407
      @hoxhabunker8407 4 роки тому

      shutup you pig

    • @matthewwyman1581
      @matthewwyman1581 3 роки тому

      @@hoxhabunker8407 shutup you pig

  • @peterbaan9671
    @peterbaan9671 8 років тому +180

    - Lewis was not the first LMG, only for the British.
    - Lewis was not the only LMG, the French had the Chuchat.
    - How can the British heavy machine gun be better if it!s identical to the German? Because it's British?

    • @chrisd2051
      @chrisd2051 8 років тому +24

      +Péter Baán Actually the Vickers had an accuracy of a rifle.

    • @peterbaan9671
      @peterbaan9671 8 років тому +16

      So as the MG 08. Because they were identical. Except the cartridge.

    • @_armyhawk_8779
      @_armyhawk_8779 8 років тому +13

      +Péter Baán Go cry to someone who cares.

    • @peterbaan9671
      @peterbaan9671 8 років тому +26

      The Toasted Hawk - If you don't want to give a fuck, then do so and go away... But don't come to me without any argument and say no one cares...

    • @_armyhawk_8779
      @_armyhawk_8779 8 років тому +6

      Péter Baán Why do i have to go away just because you're telling me to ? And heres a fucking argument for ya. Do you really think that BBC is gonna listen to you, reply to you, and apoligize to you just because you have to be an smartass on the internet ? Get out of here you trash.

  • @prettypointlessvideo
    @prettypointlessvideo 6 років тому +5

    Saw this in my sub box. Thought it was a Great War episode so was surprised to see no Indy Neidell lol

  • @damage0311
    @damage0311 4 роки тому +5

    "A sentry kit is available near your location"

  • @M17_Max
    @M17_Max 3 роки тому +8

    I remember reading that soldiers would catch the water falling from the barrel and use it to make tea, that way nothing went to waste

  • @TaZ101SAGA
    @TaZ101SAGA 9 років тому +60

    Technically the Danish Madsen was the first man portable machine gun.

    • @nathanielrincon7907
      @nathanielrincon7907 9 років тому +7

      Yes but the Lewis was the first Portable MG used by the UK.

    • @TaZ101SAGA
      @TaZ101SAGA 9 років тому +8

      I am aware.

    • @timboinozify
      @timboinozify 3 роки тому

      @@nathanielrincon7907 No, the Madsen was designed to be portable and it had a bipod -> LMG.

  • @luger_Mann
    @luger_Mann 5 років тому +1

    In order to fire machine gun in England you need to go to a secret underground bunker in America you can keep one of these in your living room :D

    • @howler6490
      @howler6490 Рік тому

      But to fire it costs many many dollars...

  • @The_Mimewar
    @The_Mimewar 4 роки тому +4

    That music is beautiful...also incredible Lewis gun!

  • @illiminatieoverlordgurglek140
    @illiminatieoverlordgurglek140 8 років тому +74

    Was the camera work and editing on this show done that horribly to make us experience some of the brutal terror of trench warfare? Because it worked. I now experience shell shock at the mention of ''WW1 Uncut: Dan Snow''
    Oh God, not again! *Psychotic rage* ''Why was it done so shitty?!!'' ''WHHHYYYYYYY''

    • @qualis6105
      @qualis6105 7 років тому +1

      Illiminatie overlord Gurglekoks ha

    • @gamestation9437
      @gamestation9437 4 роки тому +1

      In 3 years 20 men have read this comment was it worth it

  • @dude126
    @dude126 Рік тому +3

    As a gunner you never stop to consider the carnage at the other end of your burst.

  • @804_grandstaff
    @804_grandstaff 4 роки тому +10

    Dude the subtitles are cursed

  • @invisibleman4827
    @invisibleman4827 2 роки тому +21

    Imagine how horrible and terrifying it must've been to be on the receiving end of those monsters.

    • @chriscarter5720
      @chriscarter5720 Рік тому +4

      One time while I was in Officer Training we were carrying out a simulated combat exercise and were told to follow a track to a target. We were told not, under any circumstances, to depart from the track. Walking along the track we discovered the reason; to our left was a live firing range and it was in use. An army unit was shooting machine guns (probably GPMGs) and hearing those rounds swishing past, even though they were about 100 meters away and not coming anywhere near us, scared the shit out of me! I remember thinking about the boys in WW1 and marvelling at the courage it took to stand up and walk forward into that. God bless 'em all.

  • @AntiAnathema
    @AntiAnathema 9 років тому +8

    Like a Trip-Hop Massive Attack/Portishead promo: Undenied, Angel, Machine Gun.

  • @davidbowen5621
    @davidbowen5621 8 років тому +2

    Midwar MG08 were attached to a board with nails on the bottom that could be mounted anywhere. Late war versions had bipods with pistol grips, and shoulder stocks.

  • @elijahdoesmine9964
    @elijahdoesmine9964 6 років тому +2

    This video was uploaded on my birthday and the day I joined UA-cam

  • @Per-MichaelJarnberg
    @Per-MichaelJarnberg Рік тому +1

    One thing that the MG08 and the Vickers have in common is that they’re both water cooled and belt fed machine guns, MG08 fires at 600 rpm while the Vickers fires at 500 rpm.

  • @RasmusSander91
    @RasmusSander91 8 років тому +4

    +BBC the most mobile machinegun of WW1 was mostcertainly not the Lewis. Although it was a great piece of kit, the Madsen LMG employed by the Germans were more mobile and flexible in its application. The Lewis can theoretically be shouldered, but it is not practical, whereas a Madsen can.

  • @RichyN25
    @RichyN25 7 років тому +62

    lol "few locations in Britain where you can fire heavy weapons" meanwhile in Texas I can just go to a buddy's house out in the middle of nowhere and we can fire whatever we want into the side of a hill on his property, well as long as it isn't any type of RPG, and for machineguns you need a very expensive permit

    • @CaptainCalculus
      @CaptainCalculus 7 років тому +13

      RichyN25 do you want a medal or something?

    • @MrxMaGiKzZ
      @MrxMaGiKzZ 7 років тому +19

      Until he shoots up a school :///

    • @mitchellhogg4627
      @mitchellhogg4627 7 років тому +3

      Blah b itd be hard to shoot up a school without a gun

    • @maxwildt6428
      @maxwildt6428 7 років тому

      demo ranch

    • @webtoedman
      @webtoedman 6 років тому +2

      Persons in possession of a gun, not necessarily the legal owner. Statistical chance of going insane varies according to heredity, drug use, incidence of childhood abuse and environmental factors. Don't get too clever.

  • @defreesj1
    @defreesj1 8 років тому +63

    Can the BBC for once stop being biased towards British equipment? I'm not saying German gear or weapons are better, i just want to watch one of these "documentaries" that actually sit down and say this weapon was better in this situation because it has XXX properties but on the flip side this was better in this regard because of XXX not this one is clearly better because it was "lighter" but turn around in the next documentary and call another weapon inferior for being lighter and less accurate just because it wasn't produced in Britain. Don't do this to us BBC, we need you, our history channel thinks hillbilly's living in a swamp, and guys selling 40 year old memorabilia for a profit are qualified to replace real documentaries. :( Also is dubstep the best choice for a WW1 documentary? Just some thoughts.

    • @samswann3727
      @samswann3727 8 років тому +2

      Oh I hate the bbc, don't think thats what most Britsh TV is like

    • @starguy321
      @starguy321 7 років тому +1

      Jon DeFrees I agree this series is a bit shit but most BBC programming is actually pretty good.

    • @glorytotheaprdeathtotheufl7917
      @glorytotheaprdeathtotheufl7917 7 років тому +1

      Well there were some mobile mgs before, like say the Madsen, that were used in offensive combat

    • @Crosshair84
      @Crosshair84 7 років тому +1

      "Well there were some mobile mgs before, like say the Madsen, that were used in offensive combat"
      The 1895 Potato-Digger was used in the Spanish-American War by the US Marines for such things. Though not as portable as the Lewis, it was portable enough to move with the troops and be quickly setup to provide close supporting fire. It was too heavy to be reliably carried across muddy no-mans-land in Europe though. An incredibly advanced design for its day.

    • @peterking2651
      @peterking2651 6 років тому +2

      The Vickers and Maxim are comparable weapons, and it's true the Vickers fired continuously for 7 days during a test. The Lewis allowed for "Fire & Movement", something the Medium Machine guns lacked.
      Today's machine guns can be mounted in the SF (Sustained Fire) role like the Maxim or Vickers, or in the LMG role, like the Lewis. That's why we call it the GPMG (General Purpose Machine Gun) or Gimpy.

  • @RichyN25
    @RichyN25 7 років тому +12

    he forgot to mention how the german mg 08 would bust knuckles with the charge handle when firing, which is why it was important for the gunner to pay attention to where his fingers were when firing

    • @howler6490
      @howler6490 Рік тому

      Check the british weapon...had the same external hammer connecting rod...

  • @drizzle617
    @drizzle617 9 років тому +4

    first song is Portishead - Undenied.

  • @MrMrtveit
    @MrMrtveit 8 років тому +109

    Gotta learn what i can meet in BF1

    • @thesaviorwolf8601
      @thesaviorwolf8601 8 років тому +1

      Same.

    • @Beyonder1987
      @Beyonder1987 8 років тому

      +Bukken so these are what makes a sub machine gun back in WW1. Not impressed. I can't seem to find true sub machine gun that you can run and gun. However the Thomson was developed the same year the war ended and it was not used in the war so not sure it will be available in the game.

    • @MrMrtveit
      @MrMrtveit 8 років тому +1

      +ThunderWolf yeah i was hoping that it would be moe like boltrifle against boltrifle.

    • @theenglishtanker94
      @theenglishtanker94 8 років тому

      +Anonymous don't forget the Italian beretta (forgot the full name)

    • @markogruber5031
      @markogruber5031 8 років тому

      +Bukken Tifus and trench foot

  • @iota-09
    @iota-09 8 років тому +19

    "600 rounds/min" that barely felt like 400 rpm...

    • @garfd
      @garfd 4 роки тому

      Search up a 600 bpm metronome and compare it to the rpm of the Vickers

  • @Stk3r
    @Stk3r 3 роки тому +1

    might i just remond everybody, this is a WW1 Machine Gun, Its very old, very slow and very heavy, but it can still put a hole in your freaking body

  • @spaxspore
    @spaxspore 9 років тому +27

    Good video.. but this bothered me:
    @ 6:55 "Its scary.. Just how many deaths these guns were responsible for.."
    Ok BBC -
    Last i checked a firearm has to be operated and it is just an animate object. I am curious to why the British population doesn't feel the same why in regards to the precious spitfire..
    Also how many British civilians feel this same way in regards to Long bows with their arrows. These weapons were responsible for killing the flower of French nobility at the Battle of Agincourt 1415.
    You can't have it both ways: Don't try to humanize the object; humanize the person using the object.

    • @fluffycat087
      @fluffycat087 9 років тому +4

      Well the Brits have been a part of social programming / state manipulation for many years. Guns are bad and scary to many folk in the UK and Europe these days. His statement shows how this sort of regime works. I find that scary.

    • @commediaDollArte
      @commediaDollArte 9 років тому

      Inanimate. Just saying so you know :D

    • @TaZ101SAGA
      @TaZ101SAGA 9 років тому +2

      That's very true and something I've always said myself concerning classic military aircraft like the Spitfire. Everyone is proud of that aircraft, which was also designed to kill things just like these guns, but people view it differently due to the way the manipulative media portrays firearms, it's really sad.

    • @bilIburns2
      @bilIburns2 9 років тому +4

      "responsible" is probably the wrong word, but these machine guns did facilitate the deaths of an awful lot of men. Their power and ability to kill is jaw-dropping.

    • @bilIburns2
      @bilIburns2 9 років тому +1

      Hunter Jordan
      But that doesn't mean we shouldn't recognise their power to kill. A deodorant is just a metal container with chemicals inside it. A bomb is also just a metal container with chemical inside it. Let's not pretend that they are the same in terms of hazard. Let's not pretend that one doesn't have the potential to do a lot more damage than the other.

  • @AZ70900
    @AZ70900 3 роки тому

    Angel soundtrack in the background just makes this Baddass

  • @discodave8412
    @discodave8412 4 роки тому +3

    @6:20
    "Your fruit killing skills are remarkable!"
    (Gaz...call of duty modern warfare)

    • @bunjier4041
      @bunjier4041 2 роки тому +1

      Underrated, have my like

  • @ukball6497
    @ukball6497 5 років тому

    Somewhat better then remixes you usually use

  • @DeNihility
    @DeNihility 3 роки тому +1

    Imagine being ordered to charge forward with bayonets while these things mowed you and your buddies down. Yikes.

  • @woofalot13
    @woofalot13 8 років тому +112

    What is it with shooting fruit ? are people in training for the invasion of the Melons or something ?

  • @lassejeppesen7891
    @lassejeppesen7891 8 років тому +4

    "First machinegun designed to be lightweight" well how about the danish Madsen Rekylgevaer, from 1903

  • @baileys60
    @baileys60 5 років тому +2

    Here’s an editorial tip. When the moment comes we came to see (the gun firing) hold the fkin camera on the same shot

  • @noble9864
    @noble9864 8 років тому +8

    The 1918 Browning Automatic Rifle was another machine gun of World War I. However, the conflict ended before it could accomplish a sizable combat role. Nevertheless, the BAR was capable laying down serious firepower while on the move.

  • @skipfighter
    @skipfighter 6 років тому +3

    Pretty sure the madsen m1902 or madsen 1896 was build first. The lewis gun was not the first LMG

  • @coldman373
    @coldman373 8 років тому +3

    "Only one to be used as an assault weapon" Maschinenpistole?!

  • @ExUSSailor
    @ExUSSailor 6 років тому +2

    No mention of the fact that the MG08, and, the Vickers were mechanically almost identical, and, were both license built copies of a gun designed by an American. Hiram Maxim's friend nailed it when he said to him, "You want to make a pile of money? Design something these Europeans can cut each other's throats with."

    • @nickjohnson710
      @nickjohnson710 Рік тому +1

      The difference between the two is that the vickers action is turned upside down that's why its lighter, a much improved design by the British

    • @Mulberry2000
      @Mulberry2000 Рік тому

      Gatling gun any one first tried on indians in the US.

  • @YorangeJuice
    @YorangeJuice Рік тому

    unbelievable music choices

  • @DJBlackhood91
    @DJBlackhood91 5 років тому +9

    Is anyone going to talk about the CC?

    • @mozzatron
      @mozzatron 4 роки тому +1

      Omg we watched this in school with the captions on 😂

    • @MyMika2004
      @MyMika2004 4 роки тому

      What's wrong with them?

  • @daviddashti9227
    @daviddashti9227 5 років тому

    Best job, ever

  • @lewisfitzgerald7146
    @lewisfitzgerald7146 6 років тому +1

    He means first successful and reliable LMG

  • @matthewdunhill7215
    @matthewdunhill7215 4 роки тому

    your a legend

  • @coonus1
    @coonus1 5 років тому

    Love the Lewis gun. Weird ass magazine and tricky loading. One man could carry it throwing lead at fritz😎

  • @santasl
    @santasl 10 років тому +2

    Interesting presentation of such horrible machinery and yet impressive how ingenuity there was on both sides.
    Does anyone know the name of the title and the artist at the end of the video?

  • @mr.kanonenschlag
    @mr.kanonenschlag 7 років тому

    nice Video

  • @chaz725
    @chaz725 2 роки тому +1

    I actually saw the very first Lewis gun made at the Royal Enfield armouries in London ? A lot more brass on it with the serial number 0001 ! Beautifully but deadly ?

  • @monarchtherapsidsinostran9125
    @monarchtherapsidsinostran9125 9 років тому +1

    lewis gun was not the first light machine gun. sure the lewis spawned the term LMG, but the madsen seems to be the older granddad to it. the mg08 also had a "light machine gun" role, with a bi-pod. (sure as hell wasn't light)

  • @toothsamurai
    @toothsamurai 7 років тому +2

    Saw the Vicker in BF1 Beta, but that time im like meh, i regretted not tryin it out now

  • @Over-9k
    @Over-9k Рік тому

    Portishead-undenied
    Portishead-machine gun
    Massive attack- angel
    You’re welcome

  • @reddevilparatrooper
    @reddevilparatrooper 10 років тому +5

    Hiram Maxim was an American that invented and sold the rights to manufacture these guns first to the British,then the Germans,and the Russians.The Lewis Gun was an American design by Colonel Isaac Lewis of the US Army.The American government was stupid for not adopting it when they went to war in 1917 and had a few hundred guns in its arsenal.The Americans became victims of a bad joke from the French by arming them with the Chauchat Gun.FN Belgium made them by the thousands for the Belgian Army until the country was overunned by the Germans and took the drawings to England and had them made at Birmingham Small Arms Company which the British Army was intelligent enough to arm their Infantry with during the war.The Lewis Gun was first encountered by the Germans in use by Belgian troops called it the "Belgian Rattlesnake".It was even more hated by the German Infantry when the British used it in defense repelling an attack or flanking fire.Because it was so mobile the Germans made their Maxim Guns to be more mobile and they had nothing close to the Lewis Gun.The rest was history.

  • @bryancloutier5665
    @bryancloutier5665 9 років тому

    Some bad-ass music in this series...

  • @celestialteapot3310
    @celestialteapot3310 5 років тому

    This absolutely did not need music of any kind.

  • @levibradley3758
    @levibradley3758 8 років тому +5

    "Most mobile gun of WWI"? B.A.R. anyone?

    • @scrooglemcdoogle
      @scrooglemcdoogle 7 років тому

      It still saw service nonetheless, though a short service it was still the lightest rifle-cartridge machine gun. The Chauchat and Lewis were both over 20 pounds, and the MG08/15 was nearly 40 pounds.

    • @CheckMySix
      @CheckMySix 7 років тому +1

      the Bergmann MP 18 and NOT the Lewis Gun was surely the most mobile Machine Gun of WW1 and yes I know its a MachinenPistole but it is still technically classed as a Sub-Machine Gun and was the primary weapon of the Stoßtruppen or "Stormtroopers" who used it for assaulting Trenches.
      The SoShat ,Oooops I mean shauchat and the Madsen light machine gun were also mobile BUT much more cumbersome and less reliable than the Lewis Gun and ALL were much heavier and less Mobile than the Bergmann MP 18

    • @pogchampyugoslavia122
      @pogchampyugoslavia122 6 років тому

      Russian madsen mg anyone

  • @tonylee6299
    @tonylee6299 2 роки тому

    Dan Snow talking about slaughter: he should do some research on how his Canada Goose jacket is made.

  • @manjitsoni9676
    @manjitsoni9676 3 роки тому

    ਬੜਾ ਘੈਂਟ ਚੈਨਲ ਆ ਥੋਡਾ ਯਾਰ ਇੰਨੇ ਚਿਰ ਦੇ ਕਿਥੇ ਸੀ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਬਹੁਤ ਵਧੀਆ ਲੱਗੀਆਂ ਨੇ ਥੋਡੀਆਂ ਵੀਡੀਓ

  • @Bobbymaccys
    @Bobbymaccys Рік тому

    We humans suddenly tend to get ever so creative when it comes to killing each other

  • @Hitb0xinthebox
    @Hitb0xinthebox 2 місяці тому

    I think it's amazing how they had heavy and light machine guns but hadn't quite invented assult rifles yet😂

  • @sotis1756
    @sotis1756 7 років тому +2

    Must been scary running in to a mg08

  • @Sgtdoc
    @Sgtdoc 7 років тому +6

    I prefer the Mg'08 then the Vikers.

  • @cass3446
    @cass3446 3 роки тому +1

    I do like a good machine gun I went to school with one for show and tell and every one screamed from happiness

  • @FUBBA
    @FUBBA 4 роки тому

    Every American Canadian and Brit should be able to buy these inexpensively. Stand up for guns worldwide

  • @Can-rk6yj
    @Can-rk6yj 8 років тому +3

    I wish this series would have done more countries like france and america, because they both had machine guns and actually the french Chauchat and BAR were WAYYY more mobile the lewis gun...

    • @merlemorrison482
      @merlemorrison482 8 років тому

      +Can's Canucopia But the BARs did not show up until the very end, so they made no practical difference.

    • @Mr_Fancypants
      @Mr_Fancypants 6 років тому

      Even the Hotchkiss was kinda mobile but a terrible MG.

  • @user-dd8vo7or2d
    @user-dd8vo7or2d 7 років тому +1

    I like how every BBC documentary states that British have better hardware than the Germans. In that case, why did it bloody take so long for the British to "win"? And if memory serves me right, more British troops died in the war than Germans.

  • @thebloodtrail
    @thebloodtrail 2 роки тому

    What song was that playing in the background when he was shooting the fruits

  • @user-kf6nc5jv3l
    @user-kf6nc5jv3l 7 років тому +7

    The Lewis was the most mobile machine-gun in WW1? So they want to tell me that you can't just pick up a Madsen and walk around with it? This video is kind of British nationalism at it's best.

    • @user-kf6nc5jv3l
      @user-kf6nc5jv3l 7 років тому

      The Madsen was used by many nations back then (of course in different calibers), so I'd say it was in service and not just a small experiment.

    • @TheTony1596
      @TheTony1596 7 років тому +1

      The Lewis gun was invented by an American

    • @6ringsofsteel
      @6ringsofsteel 7 років тому

      if by perfected you mean ordered in a caliber that it worked properly in, then yes perfected

    • @user-kf6nc5jv3l
      @user-kf6nc5jv3l 7 років тому

      ***** Who is meant? I'd call both of them light machine-guns (Madsen and Lewis), but I know that the BAR for example is just a automatic rifle for support. There wasn't even any automatic rifle mentioned.

    • @user-kf6nc5jv3l
      @user-kf6nc5jv3l 7 років тому

      ***** This horrible game can't even get a Mauser Gewehr 98 reload wright. It really sucks. I'm not interested in BF1.

  • @Vyx25
    @Vyx25 4 роки тому +1

    turn on cc and look at 0:35

  • @Perktube1
    @Perktube1 7 років тому +3

    actually the music this time was a lot better than dubstep, a bit mesmerising by itself I would say. What is the name tho?

  • @hihu7200
    @hihu7200 6 років тому +1

    Freedom is not free. Sometimes the cost is frightfull.
    We live in a world where evil exists. Good people sometimes have to use deadly means to protect themselves.

  • @gmodzombieteam
    @gmodzombieteam 7 років тому +1

    I don't think that Lewis gun was the most mobile machinegun, the Germans used the Madsen LMG which I believe was lighter and could therefor also be used when attacking, though I am aware that there was not as many of them in the German army as Lewis in the British.

  • @merlemorrison482
    @merlemorrison482 8 років тому +19

    I guess it's not a surprise that these guys don't know the difference between "bullets" and "ammunition", after all it is supposed to be a documentary.

    • @bremCZ
      @bremCZ 4 роки тому +3

      Documentaries often use laymans terms for things. When the detail to the average viewer is irrelevant.

  • @SuperPersian5367
    @SuperPersian5367 6 років тому

    Anyone know what the music name is for the beginning of the video?

  • @AK-American
    @AK-American Рік тому

    As an American I was nervous that these Europeans were going to hurt themselves around firearms, I'm pleasantly surprised.

  • @ku-oplordkoala7471
    @ku-oplordkoala7471 6 років тому

    True, background music is bad but it is very educational

  • @zigzagham6453
    @zigzagham6453 8 років тому

    I never knew what the t-21 from battlefront was based off of, until I saw the Lewis Gun

  • @Steve-tl5ii
    @Steve-tl5ii 7 років тому +1

    One problem mate. "These guns" aren't responsible for a single death. They're tools.

    • @shanegrosse1393
      @shanegrosse1393 7 років тому

      for what?

    • @baker90338
      @baker90338 7 років тому

      Suppression, and delivery a lead and metal round acurately at high velocity

  • @SuperPersian5367
    @SuperPersian5367 6 років тому

    what is the name of the background music that starts the video?

  • @billyboy895
    @billyboy895 9 років тому +1

    What's the music playing when the details of the guns pop up?

  • @paul0bezerril314
    @paul0bezerril314 8 років тому +3

    I didn't realize that a guns alone I mean WITHOUT SOMEBODY TO MAN can kill a people !! It sounds like terminator movie

  • @pandorasflame7742
    @pandorasflame7742 5 років тому

    8300 rounds per hour is impressive for that gun- especially without reported failures.

  • @jacobmanney5455
    @jacobmanney5455 6 років тому

    I don't think that guy truly appreciates shooting those guns

  • @f1l603
    @f1l603 7 років тому +1

    3:25. Anyone familiar with the song and mind sharing?

  • @BR78973
    @BR78973 5 років тому +1

    5:35 that's not an assault that's a support weapon

  • @TaZ101SAGA
    @TaZ101SAGA 5 років тому

    It's not really bias to say the Vickers is better. In stationary positions they're both equal in terms of firepower and effectiveness, but where the Vickers shines is in weight. The toggle lock opens upwards instead of down like the MG08, enabling the bottom portion of the receiver to be removed. Use of alloys in its construction reduces it's weight further. The Vickers uses a tripod which is lighter than the MG08's sled mount. The entire system is lighter. Lighter is better.

  • @mensen4488
    @mensen4488 7 років тому

    Oh God, the editing on this series...

  • @adamchapman8450
    @adamchapman8450 8 місяців тому

    Anyone know the song thats played at the beginning with the woman singing?

  • @tetrisgamer728
    @tetrisgamer728 7 років тому +1

    Adding music like that just to entice your demographic doesn't help the seriousness of the matter at hand

  • @engineerskalinera
    @engineerskalinera 6 років тому

    Anyone know what dat music at 1:07 is called?

  • @meepsterwashere
    @meepsterwashere Рік тому +1

    Does anyone know the name of the song that played at the start or the song that started around 3:28?

    • @Over-9k
      @Over-9k Рік тому +1

      Portishead-undenied
      Portishead-machine gun
      Massive attack- angel

  • @ekdujhekeliyeentertainment497
    @ekdujhekeliyeentertainment497 3 роки тому

    Why is it so cold there? 🥶

  • @hisfavworstnightmare
    @hisfavworstnightmare 7 років тому

    What is the first background song anybody?

  • @matetochips7927
    @matetochips7927 6 років тому

    there were actually more chuchats than lewis guns and the chauchats were lighter and came sonner. They also did not mention the Hotchkiss M1914