We learn in in this nice tutorial how to build an table with pure math. Blender goes cad with the geometry nodes 😉 Btw, you mean the thickness of the table plate instead of the height?
:( It's *just* the procedural table... not even how you got the texture on there. None of the other assets are procedural either. It's 5 rectangles. Lol. Sorry. When I read titles like that, I think 100% procedural, not 1% procedural with scattering.
Hi, so since you're the second person to get the title wrong, I'll agree with you on this point and change the title right away. But I think the Geometry Nodes model is a bit more complex than just "distributing things on a rectangle"... And I explain where you can download the texture for free (Blenderkitcom). When you have more than 200 subscribers with your 1.000 videos on UA-cam, then we can talk about the content of tutorials and correct naming of titles. Also - dear master of Geometry Nodes - there are a lot of users who don't know how to create a table with Geometry Nodes.
@@blenderdude5050 The title is correct... if you read it slowly and carefully. I came to your video to learn something, but clearly you're so insecure, that even the tiniest comment sets you off entirely. There's nothing wrong with the video, wasn't saying there was. I was saying I get excited when seeing new Geo nodes tutorials pop up that I read your title too quickly, thus misreading it. And then was disappointed (due entirely to an error on my part)... but meh, you took it as a person attack, which speaks more about you than about me. Anyway. Good luck in your endeavors.
@@eclecticgamer5144 No, you where right concerning the title. but your "lol" was not the constructive critique you want to sell me with your last answer. if you read other comments on my tutorials you will realize that I am thankful for critiques.
@@blenderdude5050 The "Lol" was "laughing" at my *own* expectation VS reality. Not at you. ;) Nothing in my OP was a critique, at all. You just read it that way, because I left out some context, that I added with my later reply. Nonetheless you first reply is way hyper sensitive, which gives off a vibe of extreme insecurity. Re-read my OP with the context of "Dang, I misread the title" out in front. You'll see nothing is directed towards you.
@@eclecticgamer5144 Ok, if I misunderstood your lol then I have to apologize. sometimes it's hard to interprete the right tonality of text messages. peace. but you where right with the title anyway
We learn in in this nice tutorial how to build an table with pure math. Blender goes cad with the geometry nodes 😉
Btw, you mean the thickness of the table plate instead of the height?
Hi, yes, thickness would have been a much better name... I had the Z Axis in mind and I automatically think of "height" when i think of "z-axis"
Another amazing tutorial :)
thx!
Sirrrrrr.... you saved a life here. thank you so much.
Thank you, great contribution to geo node tutorial
Perfect tutorial.
thanks!
Great tutorial!
awesome man, thanks.
thx!
:(
It's *just* the procedural table... not even how you got the texture on there. None of the other assets are procedural either. It's 5 rectangles. Lol.
Sorry. When I read titles like that, I think 100% procedural, not 1% procedural with scattering.
Hi, so since you're the second person to get the title wrong, I'll agree with you on this point and change the title right away. But I think the Geometry Nodes model is a bit more complex than just "distributing things on a rectangle"... And I explain where you can download the texture for free (Blenderkitcom). When you have more than 200 subscribers with your 1.000 videos on UA-cam, then we can talk about the content of tutorials and correct naming of titles.
Also - dear master of Geometry Nodes - there are a lot of users who don't know how to create a table with Geometry Nodes.
@@blenderdude5050 The title is correct... if you read it slowly and carefully.
I came to your video to learn something, but clearly you're so insecure, that even the tiniest comment sets you off entirely.
There's nothing wrong with the video, wasn't saying there was. I was saying I get excited when seeing new Geo nodes tutorials pop up that I read your title too quickly, thus misreading it. And then was disappointed (due entirely to an error on my part)... but meh, you took it as a person attack, which speaks more about you than about me.
Anyway. Good luck in your endeavors.
@@eclecticgamer5144 No, you where right concerning the title. but your "lol" was not the constructive critique you want to sell me with your last answer. if you read other comments on my tutorials you will realize that I am thankful for critiques.
@@blenderdude5050 The "Lol" was "laughing" at my *own* expectation VS reality. Not at you. ;)
Nothing in my OP was a critique, at all. You just read it that way, because I left out some context, that I added with my later reply.
Nonetheless you first reply is way hyper sensitive, which gives off a vibe of extreme insecurity.
Re-read my OP with the context of "Dang, I misread the title" out in front. You'll see nothing is directed towards you.
@@eclecticgamer5144 Ok, if I misunderstood your lol then I have to apologize. sometimes it's hard to interprete the right tonality of text messages. peace. but you where right with the title anyway