You are awesome, your tools can be used by people to create new sustainable technology. Computation on composition is the key to everything. You guys are doing great things here.
Black hole = power vacuum, and has viscosity they are porous and can merge, Planck units get progressively smaller as you move towards the center of the black hole. Planck unit = power radiator, less viscosity (more magnetic flux = concerted movement of even smaller planck units, larger resistance with other planck units) (G = planck toroid jet pressure) (photon = two planck units collide = universe formation = smaller universe formation inbetween planck units, the diamond shaped geometry between the gaps of different planck toroids + jet pressure means more planck units also spin up at smaller scale [new universe] when you trace the computations based on the bisector reflection law and local averaging principles relative to that geometry). Black hole = anti magnetic flux, planck unit = pro magnetic flux, complexity and intelligence = complex arrangements of both, it's like a equilateral triangle of extremes in a weird way. Grain of salt with that last part (intelligence part) that part is more of my artistic side talking.
At the beginning of life, with [small sequence] with high copy count yield (doesn't have to be a specific class of molecules), mutation could have been more significant factor. Lipid walls allows for embedding sequential information, or even in 2d format, where hydrophobic molecular ends can embed into a lipid substrate, and a reactive end to form chemical pairs with other molecules that have a reactive end and hydrophobic end. This allows for a loose (non-perfect replication of chemical pairings [differential sequences that eventually stumble on robust sequential preservation]) mechanism to get simple replicator production going (a network of different sequences that circularly replicate each other (sequence A -> sequence B or C or D) where (sequence B -> sequence E but not A) however (sequence E -> A) and parallel (sequence D -> C -> A)) as you can see, computation and sequential composition of small chemical systems can have large evolutionary potential. This lipid 2d surface can then impart chemical pairings to other lipid substrates, where there is a gradient of diffusion of the chemical pairings hydrophobic end into the next lipid substrate, forming 2 copies. The 2 2d surfaces can then attract more chemical pairings, and replicate mutations, or asymmetrical couplings it formed, and explore a wide variety of possible chemical gradients that allow them to composite with each other, and lead to more robust replicator formation. You can even imagine thermal or electromagnetic kinetic patterns (complex oscillatory network behavior) that allow a 2d replicator to bend their lipid substrate or reach out and curl around other lipid substrates that present a (curvature based selection pressure), as these 2d replication systems acquire molecules that enable thermal or electric kinetic oscillatory properties that lead to differential success in replicating a robust network of differential symbiotic sequences.
When we slam particles together, some of those radiative factors could be more about how a more unified thing got squashed in relation to the Planck quantization (the local Planck field is like a filter in which the squashed system energy gets divided) in some cases, definitely not all cases (there has to be a structure, however, the radiation shower is not representative of the identity of the structural components), particle physics is still important because (how something gets squashed and radiates quantities is better than nothing lol). I really want this answer, really really badly, I know we can solve this. If we get the right computation acting on composition, we can solve this.
Does this sound right. (for the internal convection of a Planck unit) transfer speed to another planck unit is inversely proportional to the velocity curvature degree, do to inertia. Even if the path is the same length. This is the answer to (time and speed of light = superfluid speed / inertial) and space (inertia = centripetal + centrifugal force) [not for mass observers, for fundamental motion flow in a super fluid, with no small scale atomic boundary], centipedal force & centrifugal force trades off against big bang convection speed. Therefore 1/2 circumference cross section of toroid, or circumference of vortex, or circumference tube = Planck unit, and the speed around that planck unit is inversely proportional to the curvature, and proportional to the length. As for mass observers, this means the faster you move, the slower your internal clocks, because you are experiencing inertia in the Planck field by moving through it and the circulation of fluid takes a longer path.
I think Gravity is this ((G2-G1)/distance) * mass = [(local_h*local_c)^5/(previous_planckEnergy^2)] - [(previous_h*previous_c)^5/(new_planckEnergy^2)]/Distance between Planck units, that is the force acting times the mass. If you want to know the local Planck h size difference with respect to another, there is a way to measure it by getting the decrease in wavelength when a photons enters gravity field compared to prior wavelength of before it went in, the momentum increase is signatory of smaller Planck units. In order to stay consistent with general relativity (space/time dilation), Planck units most definitely are differential in size (remember mass scales relative to it's local Planck field average unit size), which explains gravitational force gradient proportional to curvature, and mass losing energy as it moves through a gravitational field (curvature in alignment of Planck units do to size differential, power output is proportional to the difference), mass not only has inertia when moving at high fractions of the speed of light, but simple moving to the center of a gravity field mass will decrease, while preserving the particle identity (undetectable relative to the observer, because m*v is relative to local collision and the local Planck field (h) proportionality with (c) relative constants, which are normalized factors relative to the mass detector). ((G2-G1)/distance) * mass = It's a pushing force. Big bang super fluid convection speed / local inertia = local c, which derives local h which is the circumference that local Planck unit. Grain of salt.
3D super fluid, no small scale atomic boundary (Planck units are differential in size therefore a equal proportional difference in (c) transfer speed to other Planck units, If you want to know the difference in (h) between one part of the vacuum and another part of the vacuum, wavelength of a photon will decrease, and it's momentum will increase, signatory of smaller planck mass as the photon moves into the gravity field (it has larger effect and slightly slower speed), and the opposite when it moves out (lesser momentum, faster transfer speed)). Black hole = power vacuum (they are porous and can merge, they have viscosity as well), Planck unit = power radiator (viscosity break down, they are not porous in the same way and mergers depend on their internal motion flux feed and output relative to each other [G differential throws planck units in a loop, viscosity break down]) (Planck units, and black holes are mirrors of each other) (toroid flow = planck unit, anti-toroidal flow = black hole) they can transition between each other. Planck units get smaller as you get closer to the black hole, therefore (c = transfer speed of forces to other Planck units, and h = circumference) become smaller progressively (planck density increases over the same super fluid volume as you move towards the center of the black hole). Planck units are toroids in superfluid state, they have a jet, they orientate their jets to equal out (2 pointed inwards 2 pointed outwards) (the jet = G) (planck units collide = photon transfer). 1/PlanckVelocityCurvature = smaller h value, and smaller c transfer speed to other Planck units. Each planck unit will have their own G value and it's proportional to there circumference length (h = circumference length, (c) = chained collision transfer speed of collision or jet pressure), ((G2-G1)/distance) * mass) by (new_h*new_c)^5/previous_planckEnergy^2 - (previous_h*previous_c)^5/new_planckEnergy^2/Distance between planck units, that is the force acting times the mass. When a black hole gets SUPER big, the G differential between Planck units gets very large, because the planck units become differential in size, causing curvature in their alignments, the smaller planck units recede to smaller scales (pushed by the larger G of larger planck units, Planck units nest near others closer to their size), and the black holes viscosity breaks down when they get large, turning into a power radiator (a very large planck unit) (spinning up black holes at the poles) then viscosity takes hold again as a result of radiating power (magnetic flux loops [particles] emerge out of the planck flux coming out the poles, collision with the planck field generates photons [collisions between Planck units]). The black holes can't maintain power radiator state, because they need other power radiators of the same scale to contain them. Dark energy and dark matter is just larger planck units progressively as you go towards the voids, while a black hole is made of very small planck units. While there is more G power for a Planck toroid in the dark energy portion of the planck field, they are very uniform in size relative to each other, therefore smaller amount of (G - G) differential between them, however, since these zones are so large, that slight bit of curvature (G differential) adds up. Whenever you have differential sized planck units, it curves their alignments relative to each other, therefore the larger the curvature there will be a larger G differential between them (G differential is gravity, rather than G of a single planck unit). Think of a Planck unit as pure magnetic flux (the concerted movement of many Planck units, when the viscosity of a black hole breaks down, do to planck units that make up it's body become to small relative to the larger ones, the power differential over powers the viscosity of the smaller ones, and throws the smaller Planck units into a loop [magnetic flux]) charge is just different flow directions in the magnetic flux because e^2/2pi*hbar*VacPerm*c they are inversely proportional to each other (extra charge = wobble in the system = extra magnetic flux on one side of the flow structure), I hope this helps!
![Science & Technology Q&A for Kids (and others) [Part 149]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TZxg3vJIg9o/mqdefault.jpg)
![Science & Technology Q&A for Kids (and others) [Part 149]](/img/tr.png)
You are awesome, your tools can be used by people to create new sustainable technology. Computation on composition is the key to everything. You guys are doing great things here.
Black hole = power vacuum, and has viscosity they are porous and can merge, Planck units get progressively smaller as you move towards the center of the black hole. Planck unit = power radiator, less viscosity (more magnetic flux = concerted movement of even smaller planck units, larger resistance with other planck units) (G = planck toroid jet pressure) (photon = two planck units collide = universe formation = smaller universe formation inbetween planck units, the diamond shaped geometry between the gaps of different planck toroids + jet pressure means more planck units also spin up at smaller scale [new universe] when you trace the computations based on the bisector reflection law and local averaging principles relative to that geometry). Black hole = anti magnetic flux, planck unit = pro magnetic flux, complexity and intelligence = complex arrangements of both, it's like a equilateral triangle of extremes in a weird way. Grain of salt with that last part (intelligence part) that part is more of my artistic side talking.
At the beginning of life, with [small sequence] with high copy count yield (doesn't have to be a specific class of molecules), mutation could have been more significant factor. Lipid walls allows for embedding sequential information, or even in 2d format, where hydrophobic molecular ends can embed into a lipid substrate, and a reactive end to form chemical pairs with other molecules that have a reactive end and hydrophobic end. This allows for a loose (non-perfect replication of chemical pairings [differential sequences that eventually stumble on robust sequential preservation]) mechanism to get simple replicator production going (a network of different sequences that circularly replicate each other (sequence A -> sequence B or C or D) where (sequence B -> sequence E but not A) however (sequence E -> A) and parallel (sequence D -> C -> A)) as you can see, computation and sequential composition of small chemical systems can have large evolutionary potential. This lipid 2d surface can then impart chemical pairings to other lipid substrates, where there is a gradient of diffusion of the chemical pairings hydrophobic end into the next lipid substrate, forming 2 copies. The 2 2d surfaces can then attract more chemical pairings, and replicate mutations, or asymmetrical couplings it formed, and explore a wide variety of possible chemical gradients that allow them to composite with each other, and lead to more robust replicator formation. You can even imagine thermal or electromagnetic kinetic patterns (complex oscillatory network behavior) that allow a 2d replicator to bend their lipid substrate or reach out and curl around other lipid substrates that present a (curvature based selection pressure), as these 2d replication systems acquire molecules that enable thermal or electric kinetic oscillatory properties that lead to differential success in replicating a robust network of differential symbiotic sequences.
When we slam particles together, some of those radiative factors could be more about how a more unified thing got squashed in relation to the Planck quantization (the local Planck field is like a filter in which the squashed system energy gets divided) in some cases, definitely not all cases (there has to be a structure, however, the radiation shower is not representative of the identity of the structural components), particle physics is still important because (how something gets squashed and radiates quantities is better than nothing lol). I really want this answer, really really badly, I know we can solve this. If we get the right computation acting on composition, we can solve this.
Does this sound right. (for the internal convection of a Planck unit) transfer speed to another planck unit is inversely proportional to the velocity curvature degree, do to inertia. Even if the path is the same length. This is the answer to (time and speed of light = superfluid speed / inertial) and space (inertia = centripetal + centrifugal force) [not for mass observers, for fundamental motion flow in a super fluid, with no small scale atomic boundary], centipedal force & centrifugal force trades off against big bang convection speed. Therefore 1/2 circumference cross section of toroid, or circumference of vortex, or circumference tube = Planck unit, and the speed around that planck unit is inversely proportional to the curvature, and proportional to the length. As for mass observers, this means the faster you move, the slower your internal clocks, because you are experiencing inertia in the Planck field by moving through it and the circulation of fluid takes a longer path.
I think Gravity is this ((G2-G1)/distance) * mass = [(local_h*local_c)^5/(previous_planckEnergy^2)] - [(previous_h*previous_c)^5/(new_planckEnergy^2)]/Distance between Planck units, that is the force acting times the mass. If you want to know the local Planck h size difference with respect to another, there is a way to measure it by getting the decrease in wavelength when a photons enters gravity field compared to prior wavelength of before it went in, the momentum increase is signatory of smaller Planck units. In order to stay consistent with general relativity (space/time dilation), Planck units most definitely are differential in size (remember mass scales relative to it's local Planck field average unit size), which explains gravitational force gradient proportional to curvature, and mass losing energy as it moves through a gravitational field (curvature in alignment of Planck units do to size differential, power output is proportional to the difference), mass not only has inertia when moving at high fractions of the speed of light, but simple moving to the center of a gravity field mass will decrease, while preserving the particle identity (undetectable relative to the observer, because m*v is relative to local collision and the local Planck field (h) proportionality with (c) relative constants, which are normalized factors relative to the mass detector). ((G2-G1)/distance) * mass = It's a pushing force. Big bang super fluid convection speed / local inertia = local c, which derives local h which is the circumference that local Planck unit. Grain of salt.
3D super fluid, no small scale atomic boundary (Planck units are differential in size therefore a equal proportional difference in (c) transfer speed to other Planck units, If you want to know the difference in (h) between one part of the vacuum and another part of the vacuum, wavelength of a photon will decrease, and it's momentum will increase, signatory of smaller planck mass as the photon moves into the gravity field (it has larger effect and slightly slower speed), and the opposite when it moves out (lesser momentum, faster transfer speed)). Black hole = power vacuum (they are porous and can merge, they have viscosity as well), Planck unit = power radiator (viscosity break down, they are not porous in the same way and mergers depend on their internal motion flux feed and output relative to each other [G differential throws planck units in a loop, viscosity break down]) (Planck units, and black holes are mirrors of each other) (toroid flow = planck unit, anti-toroidal flow = black hole) they can transition between each other. Planck units get smaller as you get closer to the black hole, therefore (c = transfer speed of forces to other Planck units, and h = circumference) become smaller progressively (planck density increases over the same super fluid volume as you move towards the center of the black hole). Planck units are toroids in superfluid state, they have a jet, they orientate their jets to equal out (2 pointed inwards 2 pointed outwards) (the jet = G) (planck units collide = photon transfer). 1/PlanckVelocityCurvature = smaller h value, and smaller c transfer speed to other Planck units. Each planck unit will have their own G value and it's proportional to there circumference length (h = circumference length, (c) = chained collision transfer speed of collision or jet pressure), ((G2-G1)/distance) * mass) by (new_h*new_c)^5/previous_planckEnergy^2 - (previous_h*previous_c)^5/new_planckEnergy^2/Distance between planck units, that is the force acting times the mass. When a black hole gets SUPER big, the G differential between Planck units gets very large, because the planck units become differential in size, causing curvature in their alignments, the smaller planck units recede to smaller scales (pushed by the larger G of larger planck units, Planck units nest near others closer to their size), and the black holes viscosity breaks down when they get large, turning into a power radiator (a very large planck unit) (spinning up black holes at the poles) then viscosity takes hold again as a result of radiating power (magnetic flux loops [particles] emerge out of the planck flux coming out the poles, collision with the planck field generates photons [collisions between Planck units]). The black holes can't maintain power radiator state, because they need other power radiators of the same scale to contain them. Dark energy and dark matter is just larger planck units progressively as you go towards the voids, while a black hole is made of very small planck units. While there is more G power for a Planck toroid in the dark energy portion of the planck field, they are very uniform in size relative to each other, therefore smaller amount of (G - G) differential between them, however, since these zones are so large, that slight bit of curvature (G differential) adds up. Whenever you have differential sized planck units, it curves their alignments relative to each other, therefore the larger the curvature there will be a larger G differential between them (G differential is gravity, rather than G of a single planck unit). Think of a Planck unit as pure magnetic flux (the concerted movement of many Planck units, when the viscosity of a black hole breaks down, do to planck units that make up it's body become to small relative to the larger ones, the power differential over powers the viscosity of the smaller ones, and throws the smaller Planck units into a loop [magnetic flux]) charge is just different flow directions in the magnetic flux because e^2/2pi*hbar*VacPerm*c they are inversely proportional to each other (extra charge = wobble in the system = extra magnetic flux on one side of the flow structure), I hope this helps!