@@cadencev5572 I don't know if there's any solid science behind this concept but there might be in the future. It looks like a promising area for research.
Not everybody is a natural at teaching......I believe this should be added.....bad teachers destroy a love for subjects...think of the terrible teachers we may have had at school / uni.....
Teaching is a process in which an individual explains what his or her knowledge accurately, if a teacher explains it shittily then its because He or she doesnt understood it well or he or she doesnt have the motivation in explaining it to be understood. So its useless to put it in one of the kinds of intelligence since all of the kinds of intelligence kind of had the choice to teach correctly.
I get your point, it will sound more motivating but others still takr it negatively. What about Don't think you're smart? There are 9 types of intelligence! :)
Max Backemark-Thunberg We’re talking about something different. Those are “disabilities” for lack of a better term. It is often said that students learn better by “doing” (kinesthetic) or by simply listening “verbal” etc. But, given that all variables are accounted for, there is actually no difference in which style is most effective from student to student
I agree. Being self-smart helps me to reflect on the way I do learning that seems effortless compared to many of my struggling classmates and cousins. I reflect also on the ways my teachers taught hat really influenced me, both positively and negatively. Visualization helps me explain difficult concepts to children as a private tutor. Nature-smart and number-smart people will have deeper understandings of subjects and topics that relate to science and logic/ math. Added some verbal-smartness, life-smartness, and interpersonal-smartness, then the explanation and activities are both easy to understand, relating to others, and captivating. These are especially helpful when working with children. Music and actions/ body movements can be used and mnemonics. and fun activities.
I think what this theory is ultimately trying to convey is the different ways people are able to understand and apply information. In essence, it's focusing on your learning styles and not just something you happen to be good at as this video may portray. And yes, we all can fall into more than one intelligence at varying points in our lives.
I disagree with the categories in this theory but do agree that people are smart in different areas. I believe that there should a technology "smart" category and some others could be added or removed.
@@lorrie9462 Wrong. Technology would fall under engineering, which is similar but entirely different. Math is everywhere so saying tech itself is math is kinda dumb seeing as everything has math in it. I also agree with Arctic Chill that not everything here should be classified as it's own type of intelligence. They are too specific. As Stephen Hawking once said, "Intelligence is the ability to adapt to change". The things should be a general field instead of something like "She can convince others to do things". The people smart and life smart are basically two parts of socialization skills. Yes, technology involves math, but not all math needs can engineer up some new tech. Yes, the first lady could is an example of someone who is technology smart.
J J I T i didn’t say tech and math were the same. I said „tech smart“ will likely be the same as „number smart“ because the aptitude tests required to test the mathematical capabilities of a person will most likely also be a great predictor of tech know-how
Each of these categories play a very unique part in whatever task/situation/state they are placed to/faced with. I love how they come together to create the "bridge project" in the story. If only our world recognizes our strengths and put it into something extraordinary then the world could become a better place. Because i strongly believe that everyone belongs. ❤️
6 років тому+19
Equivocating talent and skill with intelligence. An intelligent person who chooses to develop an apptitude in any of those areas will progress faster than a less intelligent person.
Only if that person has a high intelligence in one of those kinds. It's not equivocating "talent" with intelligence, is saying that different talents require different kinds of intelligence. For example, I'm really good at numbers, finding patterns and flaws on things, aplying logic on everything, etc. Some people say I'm intelligent because of that, but I could NEVER do things that require other kinds of intelligence even near as good as other people
I like how they casually mention Mrs. Music Smart was part of the project because she wrote a song about a bridge. As if that's a totally normal thing that happens.
Makes sense in a way. Most hunters have a passion for living things. Without hunting during deer season for example, the population would grow so much that there wouldn't be enough food to support their numbers and they'd starve to death en masse. It's also largely money that comes in from the purchasing of permits that supports local conservation efforts. Sometimes intelligence means looking deeper than what appears on the surface.
Yes, definitely! There is a "teach smart". I know it exists because it is my greatest strength. You first have to be, naturally, very easily confused; then you have to make every conceivable mistake you can possibly make before you get anything right. After this, you will know, exactly, what order things must occur in; and you will be able to, effectively, explain just about any pitfall that can possibly come up in the learning/training process. You must have to first deal with tremendous weaknesses before you can atain this strength.
I also doubt that solving math puzzles is the only type intelligence there is but unfortunately it is still the basis for a lot of college and job selections.
Of course, that only matters if you want to go to college or have a particular type of job. and a lot of that ties into not only ability but also motivation. I know a set of young triplets and I can see already who will be likely to thrive in a college setting, who would be discouraged because there is a lot of weight on a particular style of learning that he is not inclined towards (he would need hands-on experience and tangible product of effort; like learning a trade), and I can see who would not want to go to college at all but will want to start their own business without spending money on something that would not apply to what they want to do in life. All of these "intelligences" or inclinations play into learning styles and other factors that are complex and makeup a person's person. Very interesting stuff.
@@goddamndoor It's not. You don't know what the emotion of the person saying that is. You want to imagine it's anger, so you can make a snide little comment, because you're a dickhead.
I think there is definitely truth to the multiple intelligence theory (even if it's not easy to test it), but some of the categories are starting to get too close to the personality category. For example, existential or pedagogical intelligence can easily be aspects of personality and partially aspects of the other types of intelligence mentioned. Interpersonal and intrapersonal can also to a large degree be associated with personality, though I like to think some aspects of them can be classed as a talent. For example, being good at understanding other people and delivering information in a convincing way would be interpersonal intelligence. And being good at accurately self-reflecting and establishing goals for oneself would be intrapersonal intelligence. Naturalist intelligence is not only about liking animals and nature (that would be personality). It's more about being able to understand other living things and having the ability to tend to them and care for them. IQ and EQ would have correlations with many of these. IQ would correlate with majority of these - logical, verbal, spatial, and possibly to some degree the others as well, since IQ is about how fast you learn new things. EQ, I believe, would mainly correlate with interpersonal, naturalist, and possibly intrapersonal intelligence.
@@MatthewAshworth Intrapersonal intelligence means understanding your own feelings and naturalist intelligence means understanding feelings of others. But I think understanding your feelings and those of others are the same intelligence. If you understand those of others, you'll understand your own and vice versa. And I think autism and psychopathy don't count, since they're mental illnessess.
@@vinsplayer2634 It is a good point. I think all these intelligences can be grouped together one way or another. If you think about it, logical and spatial, and to some degree verbal, is all about understanding patterns (just in different contexts). And interpersonal certainly can be grouped with intrapersonal based on what you said (understanding feelings). But despite similarities, they also have differences, and I think this is what multiple intelligences theory is about, splitting them all up based on differences.
I don't think that intelligence is something that one is, it is something that one does. Intelligence is the ability to acquire information and apply it to novel situations.
quantifying, cathegorising and explaining is certaily helping understand a new idea. Einstein (I think) said: if you aren't able to explain a new concept simply enough, that means that you haven't understood it well enough. I am delighted to watch the way you combine visual with narration on explaining new (or new to me) concepts! In a real world I think each of us is operating on a combinations of all those qualities - we have learnt to develop one or more of them intro a skill or weakness depending on the opportunities we had in our childhood. Keep up the best work!
If you want to support our channel, please subscribe and spread the word, or if you speak another language you can write subtitles, and if you want to support us even more, you can become a patron on www.patreon.com/sprouts. Even a small contribution of 1$ means a lot to us.
As a middle school Language Arts teacher, I would teach these types of intelligence in the beginning of the school year. There was a two fold purpose. First, to familiarize these young adults that everyone has different strengths and weaknesses. If you weren't a good reader/writer or mathematically inclined, your strengths and intelligence may be in another area. This would raise the self-esteem of those who thought success was predicated on English and math. They learned early that everyone can make contributions in this world. The second purpose was about knowing thyself and others. Every year, I accomplished my mission of making my students better readers/writers and speakers and listeners. It may have been called language arts but I looked it as communications class. The students learned the skills necessary to become better communicators using their strengths and/or types of intelligence best suited for the situation.
Some people teach better than others so I assume so BUT every teacher has a style that could fit into the 9 intelligences so I think not. Are there subtypes of intelligence?
*Logic and Reasoning *Expression and Creativity *Empathy and Understanding *Communication *Dexterity *Transference These are the facets of intelligence we display, each on a spectrum within our psyche, some traits are more developed in individuals than other traits. Some come naturally others as skills we develop. The greatest of this set of intelligence types is Transference, this is the ability to transfer skills and knowledge from one aspect of the intelligence field to others, for example the use of mathematics in art or the ability to put words together into a musical form, the list can certainly be expanded. We all display all of these intellectual qualities and through nurturing or nature we develop some, all or one of these, the others are there, but dormant... like people who sing really well in the shower, but can't perform on stage.... practice is what make us better at our intelligence sets, not withstanding that individuals will have natural phobias or may be cognitively or socially as well as psychologically disadvantaged positively or negatively in one , some or all the traits; e.g. Autism, Cerebral palsy, sociopaths (who are more often than not, good at all the sets)
Maybe I don't have the right "intelligence" but I can't say I agree or disagree with this whole thing. This sort of compartmentalization seems kind of arbitrary. For example I find the "nature smart" guy to just be a nature loving environmentalist. That's more on a philosophical side of things imo. Or why not combine the people person with the speech giver? Is teaching separate or a combination of those things? I don't think us UA-cam commenters can really give a proper answer since we are not versed enough in psychology, philosophy, neuroscience, anthropology, etc (maybe a few are knowledgeable in a couple of areas but definitely not all). I can see this video to be both positive for people who know what they are and want to capitalize on it and at the same time negative to those unsure or those who are frustrated with what they got (usually the more feel type of "intelligence"). Still a nice video though and good food for thought :]
Intelligence cannot be measured. All the tests done only make one feel depressed. Coz Einstein definitely didn't take a IQ test, did he? You should be happy and make people happy, that's all. You are here for a century. The universe has stayed for some 137 billion such centuries (13.7 trillion years). You are here for a moment and gone the next. So, all I would like to say is intelligence is not the only factor about "Intelligence" lol
Teach smart I believe to be a hybrid of interpersonal skills and interpersonal skills. Being able and willing to learn the other person's mind and how will best learn and understanding your own mind enough to change to fit their learning style.
These are just examples of people being good at various tasks. A measure of intelligence would be _capacity for learning, ability to change one's worldview with new argument and evidence,_ or _problem solving capacity_
These are just nine arbitrary measures. Others could find 15, or group them into 4 or 5. I think risk assessment for example goes better with spatial skills ( type 1) than with the number cruncher!
I think it's best to state that Gardiner has a firm grasp on how overlapping ideas of intelligence, such as creativity, EQ and IQ can be practically shown in life in the 10 smarts shown. People who are musically smart, mathematically smart and visually smart are actually all able to draw upon abstract reasoning in IQ tests, which is the most accurately assessed aspect of IQ. Like it is the type of intelligence test we would be able to assess in animals and even aliens. Life smart, word smart and people smart would all rely on verbal comprehension, EQ and creativity, with a lot of influence coming from the popularity of their views influencing their success, including their personality type, particularly levels of neuroticism and extraversion. People who are nature smart, body smart and intrapersonally smart all rely on a multitude of spatial problem solving, relationship building and cultivating, including diversifying all other types of intelligence and cognitive traits that are needed in their life. Pedagogical smarts is useful in all fields and actually makes you smarter overall as the saying "learn one, do one, teach one" is universally applicable across every field and uses pretty much all smarts in order to get there. So the multiple intelligences theory is useful in understanding how intelligence is used and manifested in real life pragmatically, but is best used in conjunction with personality theory, emotional intelligence and general intelligence theory. In my opinion, the beauty of Gardiner's work is that it makes the concept of intelligence pragmatic and a lot less theoretical. It addresses how intelligence is demonstrated in non-academic and academic persons and encourages people to embrace creativity, perspective and a variety of activities, which actually assists in keeping yourself healthy, happy and prosperous!
Thank you Michael Smart for this very smart comment! I also believe that this theory helps us understand the complexity of the subject intelligence and the variety of options we have in looking and analyzing it. If you like the way we explain academic theories and want to support us to make more videos like this one, there are a few things you can do. 1. You can subscribe and click the bell icon to get notified when we upload a new video. 2. You can share this video with a friend or people from school or work. 3. You can join us. If you have insights into academic ideas, enjoy writing and you want to help them in simple language, contact us via our website www.sproutsschools.com 4. You support us directly, with a small monthly donation at www.patreon.com/sprouts
Aka theory of multiple intelligences that is taught to teachers to make there lesson plans apply to as a many students as possible. All people fall into multiple categories and tend to favor one or two.
Thank you Maribel! We are now officially on Patreon. If you want to support us more, go on www.patreon.com/sprouts. Even a donation of 1$ means a lot to us! Your feedback and support is what keeps us going!
Well, Number smart found out that the bridge was overbudget. So convinces self smart to fire music, word and life smart. The bridge also used non green materials despite nature smart opposition to save cost.
Intelligence is much more than any one IQ number. There is verbal ability, executive function, emotional intelligence, spatial reasoning and other measures. I don't know that there is any strict categorization, but there are many facets to intelligence.
I really think that he should add teach smart to the theory because knowing something and be able to effectively share and help someone understand it is a totally different skill. Compared to the 9, it is almost a blend of the 9.
Think it's cool though, not limiting the idea of intelligence creates some new possibilities for people. I think no model is likely to ever fit true intelligence, but this hints at some other directions that you wouldn't consider just looking at IQ or EQ @@sprouts
"Naturalist" shouldn't be a category by itself, it's too specific towards one particular subject. It's more like a sense of responsibility or awareness rather than a type of intelligence. Being aware that one should respect nature doesn't mean you're good at solving problems related to it.
Hello, I am a convinced believer that one type of intelligence out of nine is born more dominant, I call it human potential. It must be recognized and then developed. This is where the formula for happiness lies.
I understood that Gardner first wrote about 7 intelligences originally. I know the Naturalist Intelligence was not included in my study of MIs. It is the learning Theory I support strongly as it encourages students to work smarter with what they have. I have no time for IQ tests as they can only score what’s within the four walls and corners of a test. ‘Intelligent’ people often lack self knowledge (intrapersonal intelligence) and knowledge of others (interpersonal intelligence) which often eaves then feeling isolated or different and unable to form meaningful relationships. It’s better to teach students, children and adult, to work smarter with what they have.
and every person has all 9 types of intelligence in different amount some can have some kind of intelligence more than others but everyone is smart, find out in which field you are more productive, know yourself and absolutely you can achieve your mastery.
And just like everyone who saw this video, every person has each of these types of intelligence, just in different leves! Brain is like a muscle, and like muscles, you can train all of the intelligence or ones you want to improve!
A complete human being is the one who possess all the nine types of intelligence....becoz in our day to day experience someway or the other we are putting one or the other type or types into use..
What you are talking about is nonsense. No one has all the traits of the nine types of intelligence because the theory itself suggest that everyone has their own specialty and everyone has something that they werent specialized for.
Thank u. For letting all us know that there lot more types of Intelligence. Well, Now seeing this video it does boost my motivation as I get know that I am a "Nature Smart".
Do you know what all these people had in common? They all had an interest and pursued that interest by continuously practising and fine-tuning their skills. This is what I believe to be core of intelligence. You aren't born intelligent. You become intelligent by pursuing an interest, and by continuously practising and learning. This obsession of categorizing different types of intelligence, as if we are all destined to fit in one of those categories, just feels like it's undermining of what being intelligent really is. It's a continuous process of learning.
I agree with those, but I think that they give an esteem of intellectuality (knowledge and cognitive ability) in the specific subject, while IQ; EQ; creativity, analysis, understanding, process development... Those are more suited ideal to evaluate the cognitive condition of the mind which enables and regulates the development of those intellectuality types
The conclusion of this video is every person will focus on some field of activity, becoming good at it if eager enough. Intelligence is and has always been a capability to collect, process and to use knowledge, while also capable of questioning things (i.e. forming new entireties of pre-existing material) and thinking independently. It's no use differentiating all the possible ways you may express your intelligence, while the ground phenomenon is always the same. Why people focus and get good on different things is a matter of interest, not intelligence. There are musical families, for instance, not because of some mystical genetic impact, but simply because music is present in the family and probably positively encouraged. Of course some people are better fit to do some activity, especially in sports and other physical activities, but mentally there is not so much differentiation in the end, if everyone would get similar premises from the start.
These are applications of intelligence and not different types of intelligence. Thus a person can be nature-smart and understand how to protect the environment, but this doesn't mean this person will have the intelligence to see all of the impacts of their decisions. An important aspect of intelligence is knowing what you do not know. This is an intelligence trait important no matter which type of Gardner's "intelligences" a person belongs to. This can make a person less intelligent regardless of their area of focus and it implies a more abstract level of intelligence and traits that encompasses these 9 types.
I agree that there is a Teach Smart. There are many teachers who, the more strategies they use to teach, they can´t get their students understand the knowledge, use it in context, or enjoy it.It means those teachers don´t have Teach Smart.
I disagree. I don't think people have just one type of intelligence. For example, a person can be music smart and self smart. Everyone's a combination of thses types.
The Big Take Away is that everyone views the world a little differently......human kind does better when all those ideas are accepted and allowed to merge. Not when a few ideas are forced on everyone.
I believe in these types of intelligence. One may be intrapersonally intelligent but interpersonally not skilled, or one might both be intrapersonally intelligent and interpersonally intelligent at the same time. I don't think it's wrong to identify types of intelligence but they may really interplay with other types such as EQ and IQ and others.
Agree on this, there may be more categories in this too.. throughout history some form of intelligence has been given more importance and rest neglected , like maths was more important in 1980 to 2005, now is the age of design intelligence
people are gonna ignore this comment but originally Howard Gardner stole this idea from "Sri Aurobindo's - Planes and Parts of the Being" upon getting confronted he said that he did it because he represented the ideas better; What a shame...
Hmmm. Maybe 9 "Inclinations". And if that, there are likely many more and there is likely a way to categorize aspects of each of them together to create totally different ones. I can say though that I see children and adults that have particular inclinations that drive how they learn and process information.
I believe that people are not equal, due to the course of evolution. Just cause you are bad at one thing doesn't mean you are good at another however you can compensate by learnining. Life is not fair, life will punch you and beat you while you are down, that is how life is BUT if you persevere and stand up again you can acomplish something, you can learn different skills, and BECOME good at things even though you are naturally bad at them. However don't try to become better at your weaknesses and annihilate them, enhance your strengths and become amazing at them.
Yes. I really understand that those people are re-encountered to the power of Multiple Intelligence in the worlds. As for being new volunteered, I can followed the 9 types of Intelligence as followed as their people in the world around us. But I can pretty sure to work hard and study smart now.
I believe... There could be more than one trait of doing something with ease and style that should be smart... If someone doing just something he/good at... I'd rather say it's his/her skill ... Not that he's smart... Ex: a smartphone doesn't just do phone calls, it can do bunch of things with ease and style that's why it's smart....
Help us reach more parents and teachers to learn about psychology patreon.com/sprouts 🧡
Well, I don't think people fall into just one category of smart, I think they all have a different level of each type of smart.
Exactly what i thought
That is called general intelligence and you would be correct.
But how do you know what those different levels are for each type of intelligence(s?)?
@@cadencev5572 I don't know if there's any solid science behind this concept but there might be in the future. It looks like a promising area for research.
@@cadencev5572 You take an IQ test and the big five personality inventory test.
Not everybody is a natural at teaching......I believe this should be added.....bad teachers destroy a love for subjects...think of the terrible teachers we may have had at school / uni.....
Teaching is a process in which an individual explains what his or her knowledge accurately, if a teacher explains it shittily then its because
He or she doesnt understood it well or he or she doesnt have the motivation in explaining it to be understood.
So its useless to put it in one of the kinds of intelligence since all of the kinds of intelligence kind of had the choice to teach correctly.
Too many to count
Logistics
It’s hard to teach considering people have different learning styles
It's also the schools that choose those bad teachers
"You Think You Are Dumb? There Are 9 Types Of Intelligence" would be a much more attractive title...
now i know i can be dumb in more than one way
wildfox9t stonks
totally agree :))) I thought I would hear sarcasms in this video
For me it would be:
You think you ate smart? There are 9 types of intelligence and you are bad at every single one of them you idiot
I get your point, it will sound more motivating but others still takr it negatively. What about
Don't think you're smart? There are 9 types of intelligence!
:)
These intelligences are used to modify teaching methods and strategies because each learner has different needs and learning style. Great video!
Right! Thanks for the good comment!
Asset and CAT tests
This is factually incorrect. All the research indicates that people don’t actually have different learning styles.
Max Backemark-Thunberg We’re talking about something different. Those are “disabilities” for lack of a better term. It is often said that students learn better by “doing” (kinesthetic) or by simply listening “verbal” etc. But, given that all variables are accounted for, there is actually no difference in which style is most effective from student to student
I agree. Being self-smart helps me to reflect on the way I do learning that seems effortless compared to many of my struggling classmates and cousins. I reflect also on the ways my teachers taught hat really influenced me, both positively and negatively. Visualization helps me explain difficult concepts to children as a private tutor. Nature-smart and number-smart people will have deeper understandings of subjects and topics that relate to science and logic/ math. Added some verbal-smartness, life-smartness, and interpersonal-smartness, then the explanation and activities are both easy to understand, relating to others, and captivating. These are especially helpful when working with children. Music and actions/ body movements can be used and mnemonics. and fun activities.
Body smart = parkour ability
Lol
Lol
lol
We tend to focus too much on just a few categories. There are people you wouldn't think of as smart, but who are brilliant in their area of expertise.
I know I'm smart enough to know I'm not smart at all 👌
Welp ironically if you think you are smart enough to think you werent actually makes 50% smarter to the people who are.
@@lila7720😂🎉🫶🎉Good one!
I think you just talked about the departments in a company
PR , HR , Marketing ,Finance , Entertainment etc etc
He used an bridge building company for the easier visual to see how those different types intellegent can be used for their skills
Exactly, he is making a fool out of us...and thinking he is so that he managed more views on his channel
@@ranavijaysingh660 what a bastard! 🦏
yeah, totally depressing...very narrow and constricting
@@ranavijaysingh660 ... Are you being ironic?
I think what this theory is ultimately trying to convey is the different ways people are able to understand and apply information. In essence, it's focusing on your learning styles and not just something you happen to be good at as this video may portray. And yes, we all can fall into more than one intelligence at varying points in our lives.
I disagree with the categories in this theory but do agree that people are smart in different areas. I believe that there should a technology "smart" category and some others could be added or removed.
Artic Chill technology smart will be most likely the same as number smart
@@lorrie9462 Wrong. Technology would fall under engineering, which is similar but entirely different. Math is everywhere so saying tech itself is math is kinda dumb seeing as everything has math in it. I also agree with Arctic Chill that not everything here should be classified as it's own type of intelligence. They are too specific. As Stephen Hawking once said, "Intelligence is the ability to adapt to change". The things should be a general field instead of something like "She can convince others to do things". The people smart and life smart are basically two parts of socialization skills. Yes, technology involves math, but not all math needs can engineer up some new tech. Yes, the first lady could is an example of someone who is technology smart.
J J I T i never said tech was math. I said tech smart will fall under number smart because tech requires being good at numbers
@@lorrie9462 You just said they would most likely be the same
J J I T i didn’t say tech and math were the same. I said „tech smart“ will likely be the same as „number smart“ because the aptitude tests required to test the mathematical capabilities of a person will most likely also be a great predictor of tech know-how
Each of these categories play a very unique part in whatever task/situation/state they are placed to/faced with. I love how they come together to create the "bridge project" in the story. If only our world recognizes our strengths and put it into something extraordinary then the world could become a better place. Because i strongly believe that everyone belongs. ❤️
Equivocating talent and skill with intelligence. An intelligent person who chooses to develop an apptitude in any of those areas will progress faster than a less intelligent person.
Only if that person has a high intelligence in one of those kinds. It's not equivocating "talent" with intelligence, is saying that different talents require different kinds of intelligence. For example, I'm really good at numbers, finding patterns and flaws on things, aplying logic on everything, etc. Some people say I'm intelligent because of that, but I could NEVER do things that require other kinds of intelligence even near as good as other people
I like how they casually mention Mrs. Music Smart was part of the project because she wrote a song about a bridge. As if that's a totally normal thing that happens.
Well, although I see what you mean (and love it) but there is a song about a bridge. London Bridge but it was falling down instead of being built lol
That's a beautiful presentation - clear, crisp, concise and complete.
No time waste.
1:08 "he developed the passion for all living beings" but he´s roasting a chicken? hahaha that was funny!!!
Well, he has to eat!
Makes sense in a way. Most hunters have a passion for living things. Without hunting during deer season for example, the population would grow so much that there wouldn't be enough food to support their numbers and they'd starve to death en masse. It's also largely money that comes in from the purchasing of permits that supports local conservation efforts. Sometimes intelligence means looking deeper than what appears on the surface.
Yes, definitely! There is a "teach smart". I know it exists because it is my greatest strength. You first have to be, naturally, very easily confused; then you have to make every conceivable mistake you can possibly make before you get anything right. After this, you will know, exactly, what order things must occur in; and you will be able to, effectively, explain just about any pitfall that can possibly come up in the learning/training process. You must have to first deal with tremendous weaknesses before you can atain this strength.
I also doubt that solving math puzzles is the only type intelligence there is but unfortunately it is still the basis for a lot of college and job selections.
Right!
Of course, that only matters if you want to go to college or have a particular type of job. and a lot of that ties into not only ability but also motivation. I know a set of young triplets and I can see already who will be likely to thrive in a college setting, who would be discouraged because there is a lot of weight on a particular style of learning that he is not inclined towards (he would need hands-on experience and tangible product of effort; like learning a trade), and I can see who would not want to go to college at all but will want to start their own business without spending money on something that would not apply to what they want to do in life. All of these "intelligences" or inclinations play into learning styles and other factors that are complex and makeup a person's person. Very interesting stuff.
I feel dumber after watching this video.
Then you really are dumb. The video is stupid bullshit.
@@Kube_Dog bruh how can you get that mad over this 🗿
@@goddamndoor Not mad, bruh, just truth.
@@Kube_Dog yeah sure, because saying "this is stupid bullshit" without any explanation whatsoever is not being mad at all
@@goddamndoor It's not. You don't know what the emotion of the person saying that is. You want to imagine it's anger, so you can make a snide little comment, because you're a dickhead.
I think there is definitely truth to the multiple intelligence theory (even if it's not easy to test it), but some of the categories are starting to get too close to the personality category. For example, existential or pedagogical intelligence can easily be aspects of personality and partially aspects of the other types of intelligence mentioned. Interpersonal and intrapersonal can also to a large degree be associated with personality, though I like to think some aspects of them can be classed as a talent. For example, being good at understanding other people and delivering information in a convincing way would be interpersonal intelligence. And being good at accurately self-reflecting and establishing goals for oneself would be intrapersonal intelligence. Naturalist intelligence is not only about liking animals and nature (that would be personality). It's more about being able to understand other living things and having the ability to tend to them and care for them.
IQ and EQ would have correlations with many of these. IQ would correlate with majority of these - logical, verbal, spatial, and possibly to some degree the others as well, since IQ is about how fast you learn new things. EQ, I believe, would mainly correlate with interpersonal, naturalist, and possibly intrapersonal intelligence.
I think intrapersonal intelligence and naturalist intelligence are kind of the same thing. Understanding feelings.
@@vinsplayer2634 Yeah, they are linked by understanding of feelings, though I'd say in different contexts.
@@MatthewAshworth Intrapersonal intelligence means understanding your own feelings and naturalist intelligence means understanding feelings of others. But I think understanding your feelings and those of others are the same intelligence. If you understand those of others, you'll understand your own and vice versa. And I think autism and psychopathy don't count, since they're mental illnessess.
@@vinsplayer2634 It is a good point. I think all these intelligences can be grouped together one way or another. If you think about it, logical and spatial, and to some degree verbal, is all about understanding patterns (just in different contexts). And interpersonal certainly can be grouped with intrapersonal based on what you said (understanding feelings). But despite similarities, they also have differences, and I think this is what multiple intelligences theory is about, splitting them all up based on differences.
I don't think that intelligence is something that one is, it is something that one does.
Intelligence is the ability to acquire information and apply it to novel situations.
Today most of the skills mentioned here are used in different combinations.
In almost everything here, nothing is 'one thing or another and nothing in between'. It's a whole spectrum, like the MBTI personality clasification
quantifying, cathegorising and explaining is certaily helping understand a new idea. Einstein (I think) said: if you aren't able to explain a new concept simply enough, that means that you haven't understood it well enough. I am delighted to watch the way you combine visual with narration on explaining new (or new to me) concepts! In a real world I think each of us is operating on a combinations of all those qualities - we have learnt to develop one or more of them intro a skill or weakness depending on the opportunities we had in our childhood. Keep up the best work!
Thank you Ioan Kinde for the really nice comment!
If you want to support our channel, please subscribe and spread the word, or if you speak another language you can write subtitles, and if you want to support us even more, you can become a patron on www.patreon.com/sprouts. Even a small contribution of 1$ means a lot to us.
As a middle school Language Arts teacher, I would teach these types of intelligence in the beginning of the school year. There was a two fold purpose. First, to familiarize these young adults that everyone has different strengths and weaknesses. If you weren't a good reader/writer or mathematically inclined, your strengths and intelligence may be in another area. This would raise the self-esteem of those who thought success was predicated on English and math. They learned early that everyone can make contributions in this world. The second purpose was about knowing thyself and others. Every year, I accomplished my mission of making my students better readers/writers and speakers and listeners. It may have been called language arts but I looked it as communications class. The students learned the skills necessary to become better communicators using their strengths and/or types of intelligence best suited for the situation.
That’s great. It would have been nice to have a teacher like you when I was in school.
Some people teach better than others so I assume so BUT every teacher has a style that could fit into the 9 intelligences so I think not.
Are there subtypes of intelligence?
Might be combinations of them
Yes it is called personality
@@lila7720
Eh, I wouldn't know.
Wonderful pictures and stories..🎉 it makes me undertand the concept so easily...
Glad to know! Keep learning :)
informative and enjoyable journey to learn the 9 types of intelligence. Thank you!
*Logic and Reasoning
*Expression and Creativity
*Empathy and Understanding
*Communication
*Dexterity
*Transference
These are the facets of intelligence we display, each on a spectrum within our psyche, some traits are more developed in individuals than other traits.
Some come naturally others as skills we develop.
The greatest of this set of intelligence types is Transference, this is the ability to transfer skills and knowledge from one aspect of the intelligence field to others, for example the use of mathematics in art or the ability to put words together into a musical form, the list can certainly be expanded.
We all display all of these intellectual qualities and through nurturing or nature we develop some, all or one of these, the others are there, but dormant... like people who sing really well in the shower, but can't perform on stage.... practice is what make us better at our intelligence sets, not withstanding that individuals will have natural phobias or may be cognitively or socially as well as psychologically disadvantaged positively or negatively in one , some or all the traits; e.g. Autism, Cerebral palsy, sociopaths (who are more often than not, good at all the sets)
STARTED WATCHING VIDEOS OF THIS CHANNEL YESTERDAY AND ALREADY IN LOVE WITH THEM : )
Welcome 🤗
Maybe I don't have the right "intelligence" but I can't say I agree or disagree with this whole thing. This sort of compartmentalization seems kind of arbitrary. For example I find the "nature smart" guy to just be a nature loving environmentalist. That's more on a philosophical side of things imo. Or why not combine the people person with the speech giver? Is teaching separate or a combination of those things? I don't think us UA-cam commenters can really give a proper answer since we are not versed enough in psychology, philosophy, neuroscience, anthropology, etc (maybe a few are knowledgeable in a couple of areas but definitely not all).
I can see this video to be both positive for people who know what they are and want to capitalize on it and at the same time negative to those unsure or those who are frustrated with what they got (usually the more feel type of "intelligence"). Still a nice video though and good food for thought :]
Intelligence cannot be measured. All the tests done only make one feel depressed. Coz Einstein definitely didn't take a IQ test, did he? You should be happy and make people happy, that's all. You are here for a century. The universe has stayed for some 137 billion such centuries (13.7 trillion years). You are here for a moment and gone the next.
So, all I would like to say is intelligence is not the only factor about "Intelligence" lol
*reads the title of the video*
no i don't think I'm smart, thats why i'm getting straight E's
Smart
E's for existantial smart because you know life is better spent not studying
Dude😂🤣🤣🤣❤
Es doesn't mean u r not smart don't let these fool u they are just just some way of judging ur ability of being robot
I'm in love with your videos. As for the content: word and life intelligence are the basic lawyer skills.
Teach smart I believe to be a hybrid of interpersonal skills and interpersonal skills. Being able and willing to learn the other person's mind and how will best learn and understanding your own mind enough to change to fit their learning style.
1. Common sense smart.
2. Book smart
3. Problem solving smart
4. Creative smart
5. Wisdom smart - experience
If problems were solved like this in real life we'd be much more peaceful right now.
Thank you for your lovely explanation. This video helps me lot to complete my assignment.
Yay! Keep learning :)
Love the videos !
thank you ronit!
These are just examples of people being good at various tasks. A measure of intelligence would be _capacity for learning, ability to change one's worldview with new argument and evidence,_ or _problem solving capacity_
U certainly are teach smart ..
thanks =)
Sprouts :-)
nel perro :/
After hard work comes intelligence. That's so purile for any individual. Prominent leaders are the admired individuals.
These are just nine arbitrary measures. Others could find 15, or group them into 4 or 5. I think risk assessment for example goes better with spatial skills ( type 1) than with the number cruncher!
I think it's best to state that Gardiner has a firm grasp on how overlapping ideas of intelligence, such as creativity, EQ and IQ can be practically shown in life in the 10 smarts shown. People who are musically smart, mathematically smart and visually smart are actually all able to draw upon abstract reasoning in IQ tests, which is the most accurately assessed aspect of IQ. Like it is the type of intelligence test we would be able to assess in animals and even aliens. Life smart, word smart and people smart would all rely on verbal comprehension, EQ and creativity, with a lot of influence coming from the popularity of their views influencing their success, including their personality type, particularly levels of neuroticism and extraversion. People who are nature smart, body smart and intrapersonally smart all rely on a multitude of spatial problem solving, relationship building and cultivating, including diversifying all other types of intelligence and cognitive traits that are needed in their life. Pedagogical smarts is useful in all fields and actually makes you smarter overall as the saying "learn one, do one, teach one" is universally applicable across every field and uses pretty much all smarts in order to get there.
So the multiple intelligences theory is useful in understanding how intelligence is used and manifested in real life pragmatically, but is best used in conjunction with personality theory, emotional intelligence and general intelligence theory. In my opinion, the beauty of Gardiner's work is that it makes the concept of intelligence pragmatic and a lot less theoretical. It addresses how intelligence is demonstrated in non-academic and academic persons and encourages people to embrace creativity, perspective and a variety of activities, which actually assists in keeping yourself healthy, happy and prosperous!
Thank you Michael Smart for this very smart comment! I also believe that this theory helps us understand the complexity of the subject intelligence and the variety of options we have in looking and analyzing it.
If you like the way we explain academic theories and want to support us to make more videos like this one, there are a few things you can do.
1. You can subscribe and click the bell icon to get notified when we upload a new video.
2. You can share this video with a friend or people from school or work.
3. You can join us. If you have insights into academic ideas, enjoy writing and you want to help them in simple language, contact us via our website www.sproutsschools.com
4. You support us directly, with a small monthly donation at www.patreon.com/sprouts
I think everyone is at least 3 of these
Aka theory of multiple intelligences that is taught to teachers to make there lesson plans apply to as a many students as possible. All people fall into multiple categories and tend to favor one or two.
It is ok to be smart and it is not needed also.
1:30 Why is little Ms Number Smart topless on the beach?
I love this video. It's very uplifting. I conclude that we all carry all 9 forms of intelligence in different percentages. Have a good day!
It's probably about 12 types of intelligence.
Thank you Maribel! We are now officially on Patreon. If you want to support us more, go on www.patreon.com/sprouts. Even a donation of 1$ means a lot to us! Your feedback and support is what keeps us going!
Well, Number smart found out that the bridge was overbudget. So convinces self smart to fire music, word and life smart.
The bridge also used non green materials despite nature smart opposition to save cost.
Awesome,gardener is absolutely correct
I strongly agree, as everyone has their own interests which later lead them to master that area with devotion and hence considered smart by others.
Intelligence is much more than any one IQ number. There is verbal ability, executive function, emotional intelligence, spatial reasoning and other measures. I don't know that there is any strict categorization, but there are many facets to intelligence.
Keep up the good work!!
I really think that he should add teach smart to the theory because knowing something and be able to effectively share and help someone understand it is a totally different skill. Compared to the 9, it is almost a blend of the 9.
Point! However, multiple intelligence theory always faces a backlash for going "too far".
Think it's cool though, not limiting the idea of intelligence creates some new possibilities for people. I think no model is likely to ever fit true intelligence, but this hints at some other directions that you wouldn't consider just looking at IQ or EQ @@sprouts
Nine forms of intelligence shows a way that we can be better at the intelligence we like and are not handicapped by our personalities.
A perfect collaboration of the 9 types of intelligences. Well demonstrated! :)
"Naturalist" shouldn't be a category by itself, it's too specific towards one particular subject. It's more like a sense of responsibility or awareness rather than a type of intelligence. Being aware that one should respect nature doesn't mean you're good at solving problems related to it.
Hello, I am a convinced believer that one type of intelligence out of nine is born more dominant, I call it human potential. It must be recognized and then developed. This is where the formula for happiness lies.
These sound more like personality traits than types of intelligence, but I do believe that there are different types of intelligence.
I understood that Gardner first wrote about 7 intelligences originally. I know the Naturalist Intelligence was not included in my study of MIs. It is the learning Theory I support strongly as it encourages students to work smarter with what they have. I have no time for IQ tests as they can only score what’s within the four walls and corners of a test. ‘Intelligent’ people often lack self knowledge (intrapersonal intelligence) and knowledge of others (interpersonal intelligence) which often eaves then feeling isolated or different and unable to form meaningful relationships. It’s better to teach students, children and adult, to work smarter with what they have.
I have for the most part believed that there are different types of intelligence. Good to see it in this form.
and every person has all 9 types of intelligence in different amount some can have some kind of intelligence more than others but everyone is smart, find out in which field you are more productive, know yourself and absolutely you can achieve your mastery.
And just like everyone who saw this video, every person has each of these types of intelligence, just in different leves!
Brain is like a muscle, and like muscles, you can train all of the intelligence or ones you want to improve!
Blessed teachers who have pedagogical intelligence. They are been able to get SS understand all their teachings.
Great work THank you
Predominant: Intrapersonal, musical and naturalist. Yup me in a nut-shell 🤷🏽♀️
Now that we know about the 9 intelligences. How do the rest of us find a way to exercise those intelligences?
Yes. An intelligence type for each identity type. Can't go wrong.
A complete human being is the one who possess all the nine types of intelligence....becoz in our day to day experience someway or the other we are putting one or the other type or types into use..
What you are talking about is nonsense. No one has all the traits of the nine types of intelligence because the theory itself suggest that everyone has their own specialty and everyone has something that they werent specialized for.
This is a better way telling a types of Intelligence.
Thank u. For letting all us know that there lot more types of Intelligence. Well, Now seeing this video it does boost my motivation as I get know that I am a "Nature Smart".
Its necessary to note its only a theory but it is also important to note that no matter what always find a reason to be motivated.
Do you know what all these people had in common? They all had an interest and pursued that interest by continuously practising and fine-tuning their skills. This is what I believe to be core of intelligence.
You aren't born intelligent. You become intelligent by pursuing an interest, and by continuously practising and learning. This obsession of categorizing different types of intelligence, as if we are all destined to fit in one of those categories, just feels like it's undermining of what being intelligent really is. It's a continuous process of learning.
I agree with those, but I think that they give an esteem of intellectuality (knowledge and cognitive ability) in the specific subject, while IQ; EQ; creativity, analysis, understanding, process development... Those are more suited ideal to evaluate the cognitive condition of the mind which enables and regulates the development of those intellectuality types
Point!
Fortunately intelligent people will always be able to tell who is an idiot.
The conclusion of this video is every person will focus on some field of activity, becoming good at it if eager enough. Intelligence is and has always been a capability to collect, process and to use knowledge, while also capable of questioning things (i.e. forming new entireties of pre-existing material) and thinking independently. It's no use differentiating all the possible ways you may express your intelligence, while the ground phenomenon is always the same.
Why people focus and get good on different things is a matter of interest, not intelligence. There are musical families, for instance, not because of some mystical genetic impact, but simply because music is present in the family and probably positively encouraged. Of course some people are better fit to do some activity, especially in sports and other physical activities, but mentally there is not so much differentiation in the end, if everyone would get similar premises from the start.
These are applications of intelligence and not different types of intelligence. Thus a person can be nature-smart and understand how to protect the environment, but this doesn't mean this person will have the intelligence to see all of the impacts of their decisions. An important aspect of intelligence is knowing what you do not know. This is an intelligence trait important no matter which type of Gardner's "intelligences" a person belongs to. This can make a person less intelligent regardless of their area of focus and it implies a more abstract level of intelligence and traits that encompasses these 9 types.
I wanna know more about the existential fellow
They always read books about self improvement and lurk around videos like this one
Aah that's me
@@isrhazan7896 That's right!
channel admin is not added their opinion he just tells the research as it with visual effect and to the point
he must be hard worker.
I took this test and I found out that I am an existentialist.
good video
I agree that there is a Teach Smart. There are many teachers who, the more strategies they use to teach, they can´t get their students understand the knowledge, use it in context, or enjoy it.It means those teachers don´t have Teach Smart.
depends on what kind of teach smart there is.
I disagree. I don't think people have just one type of intelligence. For example, a person can be music smart and self smart. Everyone's a combination of thses types.
He wasnt making a point he was explaining a theory. Yes there can be a combination of intelligence and he didnt say that there was none.
The Big Take Away is that everyone views the world a little differently......human kind does better when all those ideas are accepted and allowed to merge. Not when a few ideas are forced on everyone.
Nice theory and explanation in this video. But In my opinion i think there's more than 9 intelligent type.
love this video
Music change = new season.
So what happens when you look at your life and its not visualised in the video
I believe in these types of intelligence. One may be intrapersonally intelligent but interpersonally not skilled, or one might both be intrapersonally intelligent and interpersonally intelligent at the same time. I don't think it's wrong to identify types of intelligence but they may really interplay with other types such as EQ and IQ and others.
I'm not sure how being physically capable is considered a mental attribute, but go on
Wow...grt work dr...ur imagination based drawing too grt
Sir I want to learn it from you as I want to teach my students about PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY
AtoZ Kidsdental i
seeing this i felt like im the jack of all but master of none
This is incomplete without “Street Smart” . Doc missed that one !
Agree on this, there may be more categories in this too.. throughout history some form of intelligence has been given more importance and rest neglected , like maths was more important in 1980 to 2005, now is the age of design intelligence
people are gonna ignore this comment but originally Howard Gardner stole this idea from "Sri Aurobindo's - Planes and Parts of the Being" upon getting confronted he said that he did it because he represented the ideas better; What a shame...
Definitely need teach smart, as a apprentice plumber some people can not teach others effectively and sometimes even without pissing someone off
Hmmm. Maybe 9 "Inclinations". And if that, there are likely many more and there is likely a way to categorize aspects of each of them together to create totally different ones. I can say though that I see children and adults that have particular inclinations that drive how they learn and process information.
I believe that people are not equal, due to the course of evolution. Just cause you are bad at one thing doesn't mean you are good at another however you can compensate by learnining. Life is not fair, life will punch you and beat you while you are down, that is how life is BUT if you persevere and stand up again you can acomplish something, you can learn different skills, and BECOME good at things even though you are naturally bad at them. However don't try to become better at your weaknesses and annihilate them, enhance your strengths and become amazing at them.
We've learned this recently from our E.S.P class....
Yes. I really understand that those people are re-encountered to the power of Multiple Intelligence in the worlds. As for being new volunteered, I can followed the 9 types of Intelligence as followed as their people in the world around us. But I can pretty sure to work hard and study smart now.
I believe... There could be more than one trait of doing something with ease and style that should be smart... If someone doing just something he/good at... I'd rather say it's his/her skill ... Not that he's smart... Ex: a smartphone doesn't just do phone calls, it can do bunch of things with ease and style that's why it's smart....