Thank you for your opinion. However, my impression with China's EV is that they are cheap, but quality may not be as good as they declared because of information transparency. Of course, personal privacy is another concern.
I agree the China EV import tariff is not an economic issue. However, I disagree that your argument is a political issue, I will argue the import tariff is a legal issue for the Canadian government.
我周圍嘅朋友最想買RAV 4 Prime Plug in Hybrid, 可惜唔夠貨。Toyota Lexus 二手價比其他車都高，穩定。Benz BMW 其實比日本車唔係貴好多。但係有問題肯定比日本車高，用幾年就大把問題。對於政府話2035 用EV ，到時點冇人知！不過我唔會考慮電動車。尤其我們都穿州過省！你望下條街就發現日本車是主導加拿大！你所講的反而不是問題！
Just setup the same agreement with China as we have for the other brands. I believe the agreement is anyone who sell a car in Canada has to produce one here, which is how we got all these cars produced and exported here. China can do the same, but they will lose the labor cost advantage. It will be up to China if they want to do it
China EV quality is good. Why cheap, simply the cost in China is not as high as those in US and Europe. So they can sell cheaper. It’s not so called subsidized and excess production
@@Tomysit416 Totally agree. For example: Wechat users can continue to use wechat in North America, but Whatsapp users cannot continue to use it in China.
I guess your comment on economic benefits, and on preventing a war, was more hinting on us should not block Chinese cars from coming in. However, you didn't mention the huge subsidies from the Chinese gov to their manufacturers, and creating an unfair competing advantage. On preventing a war, did u remember Putin went to visit China during the winter olympics before the invasion? I still remembered the scene where Putin sat alone napping during the opening ceremony. Also, the long table scene where France Macron persuading Putin to back down. Are you sure handing an olive branch to them can prevent a war? or we should start creating a scenario where they know it is impossible for them to start a war?
There's an article that's been under reported or ignored by the mainstream media. Google "Trump invites Chinese to build US auto plants" and it should bring you to an Asia Times article. In that article, it says Trump would still tax 100% of Chinese EVs made in Mexico but invited Chinese EV makers to build in the U.S. using American labor. The article didn't say whether vehicles made in the U.S. is tariff exempt but it wouldn't make sense if it's not. lol I can't see BYD or whoever would just rollover like that for no benefit. Basically what I am saying is, on the issue of Chinese EVs, Biden (in action) is more protectionist than Trump even though Trump had always gone on and on about China this and that. If Trump becomes President again, he might be a little more open to working with China this time around and do a complete 180 on his previous protectionist stance.
感謝Terence你客觀中肯嘅分析 !👍👍
說得很好，政治上沒有永遠朋友，沒有永遠敵人，只有永遠利益，將任何事推向極至對立，對世界沒有好處，甚至會推向危險境地
OMERS 賣了Lifelabs 比Quest Diagnostics 後加拿大所有大型化驗所都是美企,又唔聽到Ottawa講國家安全？我們所有的身體狀況都將會“送美”。
多數大陸人來加拿大做中國人，愛祖國，用國貨。我不是中國人, Canada first
@@wanggok非中国人就别用中文！曱甴！
非常喜歡您的製作，並同意您在這裡的大多數觀點，特別是關於電動車進口稅的決定主要基於政治和總體經濟原因。但就國家間的信任和關係而言，我想當今民主社會對中國提出嚴重的「信任」問題是基於他們最近的許多負面經驗。此外，並不是說我們的民主社會的管理機構不存在「信任」問題，而是我們有一個允許其公民面對和改進它的系統。
公民可以改進政府系统？那么為何加拿大會越來越差？你被主流傳媒洗腦了！
在加拿大想揸囯产电动车，回流中國是唯一途径。
Chinada
為何要驾中國電動車？
@@wl9399 因為是中國人
就算我係中國人都唔會揸中國電動車！
@@wanggok 質量是考量。不是種族問题，你扯得太遠了。
你全部分析都好精準，但綜合所有野之後，政府對中國電動車加收關稅係絕對正確。
Terence，多謝你嘅分析。以我親身嘅經驗，喺加拿大買一架豐田嘅Hybrid車，車係喺加拿大境內製作，及送付。
所以剛才閣下提及加拿大所製作嘅汽車都係出口美國。我對這個論述有一個「問號」。
很感謝Terence的公正分析。所說的都是正面的。
?
周圍都唔夠平價電動車,掙在有幾平先至好講！
這頻道非常中肯，有理有據，用數據說話，可惜立場先行，政治上腦的人就唔會咁睇😢
加拿大根本唔夠infrastructure令ev可以成為主流，2035年要實行只賣ev係不切實際！自由黨最中意講好聽嘅廢話！
閣下對人性的認知太過善良了
膠人居膠地
其實並不複雜：遠親不如近鄰
基辛格:「與美国為敵是危險的，與美国為友是致命的」。近鄰？致命囉！用用腦子！
Thank you for your opinion. However, my impression with China's EV is that they are cheap, but quality may not be as good as they declared because of information transparency. Of course, personal privacy is another concern.
我不大同意加拿大需要入口一些平價的電動車，這不單是供電站或供電能力這個表面的問題，更因為平價電動車比起貴價電動車更危險，電池更容易自燃，而加拿大大部份房屋都是用木材搭建而成，晚上起火更容易危及性命。由於平價鋰電池非常危險，若加拿大引入大量平價電動車，而因鋰電池所造成嘅經濟及人命損失將會遠大於經濟效益。
但從經濟角度嚟講，雖然引入中國電動車在加拿大傾銷在短期內唔會有太大影響
但有冇諗過，如果喺其他國家都引入中國嘅電動車，長遠會對其他國家嘅汽車銷量一定會受到大大嘅打擊！
之後回力鏢會返返去加拿大，令到加拿大嘅汽車製造業都受到大大嘅打擊！
到期時真係一發不可收拾！全世界嘅汽車業將會被中國控制住！然後後悔都太遲！
中國品牌電動車嘅安全標準其實係較低，應該過唔到呢一邊嘅審批。
如你所說的,那加政府就不用大喊加關税啦! 因為根本入不到口.
@@evachan7082 只係做俾美國睇佢有做嘢，其實一直都入唔到口😆，所以加關稅根本就係偽命題
你述説的觀點，也正是中國政府向世界説的觀點，十分巧合。
大部分人都從政治立場去分析呢件事， 而Terence係從純經濟角度去分析，大家只係觀點与角度不同
經濟，政治，冇關係的？
在加拿大無一是自己嘅牌子、多數是美國牌子、所以加拿大無得 say no
對中國的產品，特別是食物和電噐用品，避免購票，即使便宜，安全性是首位。
GOOD
頭半 part 嘅分析很好，但最後嘅結論令我好 surprised, 估唔到博士原來想法咁天真
有目的
@@pychow5666 佢對經濟嘅好多看法都真係令人有噴噴稱奇嘅感覺，分析同判斷都堅離地，就好似象牙塔裏面嘅學者呈現膠化狀態，只可以作為更多資料嘅參考。
唔好太短視，如果給中國的EV傾銷入加拿大，將對全球汽車製造業造成巨大衝擊，包括加拿大的汽車製造業。 中國的EV策略本身就已經包含政治考慮，大量的政府的補貼就會造成全球性的傾銷，所以不要說如果單純考慮經濟的情況，因為實際上不全在。
中國好，世界好
他的分析好有問題。可能有背境。
@@wl9399 加拿大好多這些中國人
@@wanggok台灣和菲律賓和日本已經煩不勝煩。
睇吓電動車帝國在使用三至五年的維修視頻你重想要嗎，咪數是公里計算只有英咪六成。
大陸出嘅任何車都唔好俾佢入口，無論點平都唔俾
但係好多無膽留大陸做中國人，要移民到外國受人家保護来做中國人，呢班人忠愛中共，等着byd
I agree the China EV import tariff is not an economic issue. However, I disagree that your argument is a political issue, I will argue the import tariff is a legal issue for the Canadian government.
加入北美自由貿易區，是經濟加政治因素！這兩個是不可分割的（不可能只享受關稅優惠，𥄫引投資；而又有自主關稅權利）。除非像中共國一樣⋯⋯偷呃拐騙，不守信用！所以博士提出的只是偽命題！不如考慮怎樣利用自家生產的優點和技術滿足內需市場！
黑暴曱甴一隻！不学無術，
對唔住，你竟然重對中國有希望，覺得敬習近平一尺，佢會敬返你一丈。過去幾年比晒機會啦，點解重會有幻想？
對拜登兒子來說一定想信
愛中國的中國人，憎中共。愛中共的中國人，中共最好的。多數大陸人要來加拿大做中國人，愛祖國，用國貨。我不是中國人, Canada first
黄人曱甴仔對加国一點貢獻也没有，來加白食！
想了解下，買電動車可以點樣每年慳2萬蚊？
我周圍嘅朋友最想買RAV 4 Prime Plug in Hybrid, 可惜唔夠貨。Toyota Lexus 二手價比其他車都高，穩定。Benz BMW 其實比日本車唔係貴好多。但係有問題肯定比日本車高，用幾年就大把問題。對於政府話2035 用EV ，到時點冇人知！不過我唔會考慮電動車。尤其我們都穿州過省！你望下條街就發現日本車是主導加拿大！你所講的反而不是問題！
唔講咩國家嘅EV, 你加拿大真係咁岩用EV咩? 冬天果6個月EV真係分分鍾死得仲快, 除左溫哥華同海洋四省, 其他省都唔係好岩用EV. 唔好下下都係政治先, 就算加拿大引入大陸D車, 佢最後賣都唔會平過TOYOTA, HONDA, 同D泡菜車好多, 因為加拿大係山頭保護主義國家, 從來唔會引入競爭, 你望下加拿大D airline, grocery, telecom都知啦. 所以加唔加EV關稅真係not a big deal, 唔好為反而反
@@terenceau-kd5vh 除非你當它是玩具
绝对同意 Terence 說加拿大人需要入口中国 EV. 但暫時在路上未見过中国 EV.
I've seen quite a few Polestar EVs lately which is owned by Geely.
加拿大自古是中國的
加拿大有足夠充電樁嗎？電車難囉！大陸係好平，但係好多時著火，撞左開吾到車門，安全也是問題！再春加國再想發展車用電磁！？別浪費了！不論進出口都沒好處！加國工人飯碗也不保！對環境保護有好處嗎？它們怎樣發電？媒？很環保？生產電車是用媒發電？電車太 重，車軚產出大量陳，又環保？
充電電椿是很大問題，加拿大不是中國，動不動就舉國之力，我們都係任由市場決定，巡序漸進好些。
tax must be 1million%.
如果大陸真係咁樣做，佢就係砸自己飯碗
我地無話要殺左對方，但可惜對方係想殺左你...
講番轉頭，咁點解加拿大造既車唔可以local賣？？
why Canada dont make their own branded car ?
因為美國不准許呀! 美帝最霸道! 全世界都要比美國有錢賺,如果不服從,他便炸死你!
Just setup the same agreement with China as we have for the other brands. I believe the agreement is anyone who sell a car in Canada has to produce one here, which is how we got all these cars produced and exported here. China can do the same, but they will lose the labor cost advantage. It will be up to China if they want to do it
China EV quality is good. Why cheap, simply the cost in China is not as high as those in US and Europe. So they can sell cheaper. It’s not so called subsidized and excess production
全球暖化嚴重,潔淨能源是大勢,北美車企鬥不過人,現媒體便宣傳電動車的不是,是短視,政治為先,美國削減通漲法案及加拿大稅收減免及補助何嘗不是補貼,祇許周官放火
補贴多過中共？都有強迫勞動？
冇人再買電動車！因為根本就是不化算 ! 所以不要在作大
今年第二季tesla交付左42萬部，睇黎買果d唔係人
繼續為汽油車打氣 可能夢境會成真
中國的電動車安全性？為省錢是理由嗎？
@@wanwan1828 除非你當做是玩具
I leaned again. Thanks
感谢Terence的分享。
零和博弈一直系美国人的想法，中国其实无打算同距打个你死我活。
某种意义上讲加拿大就是美国的附庸国，国土面积很大但国防完全靠美国。
孟晚舟事件可以看出，加拿大根本不能违抗美国的意志，就算对自己的经济不利也要执行美国的命令。
最近有个指控叫“产能过剩”，其实就系竞争力过劲，公平竞争斗不过只能抵制咯。
@@linick6300 不過中國嘅政策本身就唔係公平競爭，唔容許外資喺中國公平發展，冇公平嘅知識產權嘅保護，挪用外資高昂嘅開發成本所得到嘅技術直接廉價生產，其實係西方國家覺醒得太遲就真。
@@Tomysit416 西方在你的宣传之下总算觉醒啦，加油！
@@linick6300 唔需要宣傳，只要有喺商業上有同中國交過手都知道佢哋嘅手法，只要唔係只接受單一受管控嘅資訊，都會對呢啲手段有所認知。
@@Tomysit416不容外国公司在中国發展？Apple 呢？Tesla 呢？那中国的華為能在美国發展？中国电動車能在美国發展❓OMG, 又一隻不学無術的曱甴！
@@Tomysit416 Totally agree. For example: Wechat users can continue to use wechat in North America, but Whatsapp users cannot continue to use it in China.
加拿大要聽命於米國；而加關稅則是完全政治操作。
本期的分析實在不能苟同。
👍👍👍好呀！比亞迪300%
I guess your comment on economic benefits, and on preventing a war, was more hinting on us should not block Chinese cars from coming in. However, you didn't mention the huge subsidies from the Chinese gov to their manufacturers, and creating an unfair competing advantage. On preventing a war, did u remember Putin went to visit China during the winter olympics before the invasion? I still remembered the scene where Putin sat alone napping during the opening ceremony. Also, the long table scene where France Macron persuading Putin to back down. Are you sure handing an olive branch to them can prevent a war? or we should start creating a scenario where they know it is impossible for them to start a war?
惡沒有制衡，殺傷力就唔講得笑，要及早對付。
加拿大有啲乜嘢唔係笑話, 加拿大生產嘅汽車一定係賣去美國，因為車廠可以收美金
汽車賣去中國的就中國話事，賣去美國的美國話事，問題是中國是政府說了算，而美國是人民話事。
用這麼多時間做分析,都無用...正常人都會知道, 例如BYD HYBRID ..可以行2000 KM , 又不是天價, 對環境多好,只會加稅, 可以對碳排放有用咩?...政客高薪厚職...只會玩政治..可恥...
所以個關鍵就係要㨃冧嗰個獨裁威權政權，先可能有互信。
搞冧美国的资本獨裁政權❓我十分同意！
@@JimHoh3 恭喜您。不愧身為擁有小農dna嘅芝麻愚民
沒有老美就天下太平了
國家安全係包括物理安全，中國電動車自燃同自爆新聞同影片，喺中國瘋狂壓抑下仍然每日更新，我都唔想街上或車庫入面有大量流動炸彈
其實,加拿大政府已計劃加人將於2030年全用电車。假如，中國電車耒大，那就可以推低現時我們的電車價格，用與不用，閣下決定。
其實是在2035 年全面禁售燃油車，不是全用電車。
你覺得中國這麼好,你真的要移民去中國,加拿大這個國家真係不適合你,又落後,政策又差,樓價有貴,工作職位少,又有大把喪屍,毒品有合法化.
解放加拿大先行者
佢唔係加拿大住，不過唔知點解講親都係加拿大🇨🇦！
曱甴你連英文也不識，祇來加白食，討厭的曱甴！
是版主天真？中共對世界經濟及政治的滲透是憑空想像？😅 OMG
還是有其他的因素？🤔
價錢平就得，難怪咁多偷車了，賊貨一定最平啦😂
OMG 又一隻来加白食的曱甴！
先用 加拿大既減炭國策作引導 再話自已需要中國電動車 唔好講到美帝要迫加拿大跟隨 美國無左加拿市場 即係生意少左 咁關閉加拿大工廠好正常 我都唔講電池事故既嚴重性 維修費用唔計? 電池一壞total loss 窮人買左人身債啊 呢條友好似聲稱自已係博士 ?係央行工作過? 有無申報自已係外國代理人？
多數大陸人來加拿大做中國人，愛祖國，用國貨。我不是中國人, Canada first
你呢條友又是一隻來加白食的曱甴
There's an article that's been under reported or ignored by the mainstream media. Google "Trump invites Chinese to build US auto plants" and it should bring you to an Asia Times article. In that article, it says Trump would still tax 100% of Chinese EVs made in Mexico but invited Chinese EV makers to build in the U.S. using American labor. The article didn't say whether vehicles made in the U.S. is tariff exempt but it wouldn't make sense if it's not. lol I can't see BYD or whoever would just rollover like that for no benefit.
Basically what I am saying is, on the issue of Chinese EVs, Biden (in action) is more protectionist than Trump even though Trump had always gone on and on about China this and that. If Trump becomes President again, he might be a little more open to working with China this time around and do a complete 180 on his previous protectionist stance.
which Chinese EV makers?
膠博士，都係建議你返北京啦，果度對魔鬼咁大愛適合你多D！
中國人喜歡投靠西方做中國人享受自由愛中共的
九曱甴，你祇識來加白食，注米虫！屌！
95%出口？为了强化你自己的观点乱作数据
Sorry, 95% number is from Government of Canada ...
一本正经地分析，读书多，读坏脑
聽完咁嘅評論真係笑咗出嚟 就好似兩三年前 我黃絲朋友 專登通知我 滷味唔搞5g同埋盟友一齊搞6g 結果上個月中國6g衛星上左太 滷味同啲盟友過過你眼望我眼唔願出錢 佢哋知道出咗錢搞6g 6g支都係輸畀中國 哈哈哈
中國的電動車安全性？為省錢是理由嗎？
M-Hero 917? U8? U9? 邊架？