28:05 That's an ultimate military formation used to surround enemies called 'Chakravyuha'. Comes from Mahabharata in which only a few including Abhimanyu knew how to go inside the Circles with warriors at interleaving position in an increasingly tough position. Almost impossible to break it.
@@zuzanareacts@zuzanareacts hey Zuzana , You have reacted to nIlesh oak on beerbiceps podcast . Do you know , about his friend Rupa Bhaty , she has found that the Rig veda has memories as old as 200k years old, please react to Nilesh oak or Rupa Bhaty mam video .
24:00 but there was a little difference, Iranians connoted the word "arya" with lineage or race, Whereas Indians used the word "Arya" to denote the quality of a person and not his/her lineage, because in Sanskrit the word "Arya" means a Nobel person (in terms of morality) i.e. a person who possesses good moral values.
Yes exactly! For example, Ravana referred to himself as Arya, since he considered him to be superior in all qualities. Even Tara, the wife of Valli, addressed him as Arya, if I'm not wrong.
Recently got to saw a linguistic video linking Banjara tribes of India having 100+ similar words to Europe's Roma Gypsy. They were indeed indian origin but no such video was there comparing languages of desert tribes. And now thjs video linking Sanskrit to ethnic European languages is so wholesome. With time all such things vanish, just like we ourselves pick up trend words, genZ slangs etc. Siberia- Kusa is hair/ cutter Sanskrit - Kesh is hair
@@zuzanareacts hey Zuzana , You have reacted to nIlesh oak on beerbiceps podcast . Do you know , about his friend Rupa Bhaty , she has found that the Rig veda has memories as old as 200k years old, please react to Nilesh oak or Rupa Bhaty mam video .
Thanks for bringing this! I had sanskrut as optional language during high school for 3 years. It was very repititive to learn those verbs in different forms.
@@zuzanareacts check this @zuzanareacts hey Zuzana , You have reacted to nIlesh oak on beerbiceps podcast . Do you know , about his friend Rupa Bhaty , she has found that the Rig veda has memories as old as 200k years old, please react to Nilesh oak or Rupa Bhaty mam video .
In Sanskrit there are 4 sounds of each letter. For example : For 't' letter there are 'ta', 'tha', 'da', 'Dha' 'Pata' in Sanskrit also means Fall just like you said in 4:44. 'Patha' means Path and 'Pada' means foot.
T and D each have four different letters Soft T (त), Soft T aspirated (थ), Hard T (ट), Hard T aspirated (ठ) Likewise, Soft D (द), Soft D aspirated (ध), Hard D (ड), Hard D aspirated (ढ) And then there are retroflex variants of Hard D (ड़) and Hard D aspirated (ढ़)
In ancient Iranian the Sanskrit 'S' becomes 'H'..!! Therefore Ahura as in Ahura Mazda is in fact Asura Matsa to the vedics! While similarly Indra Deva of the vedics is in fact Daeva Inthra of the Iranian..!! That Battle formation is called the 'Chakravyuha' the most famous manifestation of which is in the episode involving Abhimanyu in the Mahabharata..!! You can google it for more details..!! And yes, in the video it is AI generated.!!
If you are talking about Hindi, this is correct, but not for Sanskrit. There is generally a long 'ā' and a short 'a'. For example Rāma (pronounced as Raama). People speaking different languages change this to Rām, Rāmā, etc. but the correct Sanskrit pronunciation, which should also be used in English, is Rāma.
@kaushiksunapu5657 I think you don't have good knowledge about letter of devanagari lippi and roman letters Here people used long a not the short one to complete the letter Ram is correct not Rama
The Vedic Sanskrit was relevant for the Vedic and Tantric Mantras (not for the Sabari Mantras) and also for the rhyming they used to do back in the days for making such large poems and making much more philosophical way of explaining some things. Classical Sanskrit is primarily based on the Communication and used in the texts that did not had much poetic nature and hence wasn't much philosophical as compared to the Vedic texts. So the Classical Sanskrit caused a bit problem in the definitions of certain words that were being used in the Vedas (and all of its additional components), that led to the misinterpretation of the Hymns from the Vedas by newer generation. And unfortunately it became a primary reason for the defamation of some parts of the Vedas in public that never got any guru to explain its meaning since it was too philosophical as compared to the Classical texts.
I would also suggest you to the 4000 years old history of Indian Pariah Dog By Project Shivoham That talks about the spiritual significance of dogs in civilisations its a must watch
@@zuzanareactsyou have visited india and might notice that people are interested in knowing others, so if possible do add more about your culture and country.
It is considered to be mother of all languages of the world, there are many proofs, facts and evidences in the support of this argument. Sanskrit is considered to be the second oldest language of the world. Tamil is considered to be the oldest language of the world. But there is a confusion, some other foreign historians claim that there are some other world languages which are slightly older than Sanskrit and Tamil. I don't know whom to believe. There are different opinions and views across th world about the oldest languages of the world.
Asura literally means non-rythmic or chaotic while sura (another name for Devas) mean rhythmic or orderly being. One is driven by desire for war and chaos. Its similar to the concept of chaotic beings and orderly beings known as Asiers and Vanirs in Norse mythology. Description of Asura that we know are beings that driven by the desire for war and chaos. They believe their pupose to be here is to fight againt evil but what is evil in their eyes are the very governing laws of this universe that gives it it's purpose or identity (aka the devas). Its hard to explain everything here but yeah... that's the surface level stuff basically.
10:18 the things with German is (I'm also do speak the language btw), several words are combined in a way to form composita, but that leads to the formation of extremely long words altogether. In Sanskrit, while it shares the quality of composita, it also compresses the words in a way that much more information can be packed using a few alphabets.
It's asur like the other words mantr yog etc but when they speak these words in English they put extra a ( I don't know why) which becomes asuras mantra and yoga in english
The circular battle formation is the most popular formation in Mahabharat battle and other bharat battle It is mentioned as chakra viyuh in warfare chapters and books
*Asura* = Vedic languages _mostly referring to negative and even dem0nic energies_ *Ashura* = Avestan based languages _referring to divine energies_ Politics lead to divergence in worshipping patterns, in fact just inverse of "gods" and "demons" in each others traditions
The followers of the Zoroastrian religion are called Parsis as they came from Persia now Iran. They are one of the most successful and peace loving people you will ever come across. One of the most famous Parsis was Sir Ratan Tata.
There is also a langugage like more pure sanskrit, previous to sanskrit, the chando basha, its like from which sanskrit, welsh and more languages are made. Chandobhasha, mother of sanskrit and western languages has more content of sanskrit. more purer form. vedic books were written in chandobhasha, eg rig veda, and 3 more books, and its 100,000 yrs old and its not a joke..
Yes they always add A at the end in a translation like we say mahabharat but translation mahabharata, we call Ram but translation Rama , similarly we say Ved but translation Veda ! Almost every translation has this ! I Do not know someone explain please if someone knows ..🙏
Actually in Deepest Water's he might will talk about that Veda's were not composed in 1,500 BCE specifically Rig Veda was not composed in 1,500 BCE but 3,000 BCE You Remember that Dashrajnya "Battle of 10 Kings" yeah that happened somewhere around that period now how did we reach this conclusion well it's something Historian's and Linguistic Experts have something to do With but after that war all the defeated Tribes moved to different Regions and Settled and One of those Tribe's Remenant were Found as Mittani Kingdom established in 1,500 BCE and their ancestors used to speak Sanskrit one of the Mittani King's daughter was Married to some Egyptian King and the other Linguistic Tribes who moved formed Greeks and all now that's where Indo-European Debate, debate about god's and Aryan Migration theory Starts, so it's clear that if Mittani's were present there along the way at 1,500 BCE and their Ancestors of Mittani's who lived way before 1,800 BCE who used to speak Sanskrit which is Actually the Vedic Sanskrit used in last part or newly introduced Rig Vedic Books The old Books of Rig Veda has totally Different Form of Sanskrit and it shows that these people who we call Mittani came there very long ago that no one can properly date similarly same is for Greeks and other tribes but Genetic Lineage has nothing to do with Language because language can be adopted and Genes only carry via Reproduction so the Proto Indo-Iranian languages that they used to speak turned out with their little variations into new languages somehow
@zuzanareacts ua-cam.com/video/J63Udr_cuaA/v-deo.htmlsi=04uNjF4AMxkllmKt This video will help you understand everything about Rig Veda He is a Linguist from India Shrikant Talegeri you can understand the Indian side of story from this video Although I don't think it's that easy to understand the whole debate with few videos rather Indo-European language model itself is flawed and every year a New Research paper pops up regarding the Origin of Indo-European languages last time it was"Language trees with sampled ancestors support a hybrid model for the origin of Indo-European languages" by Paul Heggarty, published in Science in 2023 ¹.
@@zuzanareactsmittanis originally called themselves Marya ( mortals) Marya mentioned as warband of god Indra who were raiding warriors Marya associated with young warriors and originally to gandhara ( eastern Afghanistan) region in RigVeda
The timelines mentioned in the video have no basis, eg. Vedas were written in 1500 BC. These dates were given by British or European Indologists & is an effort to synchronize with Biblical creation in 4004 BC. There are many efforts to date Vedas based on the descriptions in it, eg. Dried Saraswati River. Many scientists believe Vedas are 7000 - 9000 years old. As per Indian literature, Vedas were written by Veda Vyāsa at the time of MahāBhārata war 5000 years ago & till then, it was transmitted through generations orally.
@@zuzanareacts usually we do not say Asura in India ! We say Asur but idk why they add A at the end of every translation ! Some examples are like :- mahabharat-mahabharata , Ved-Veda , Dev-Deva, Swastik-Swastika and many more ...
He just explained there no s in persian Or older lamguages soma as homa sindhu as hindu asura as ashura. It's mahabarata you have to learn about chakraview to know about this battle formation.
7:06 just want to correct this guy. with the recent combination of astronomical and archiological research. Vedas are minimum 1,00,000 years old. As the astronomical details available in Vedas are only possible before 100,000 years. like polar stars, dhumketu etc.
If a book is predicting a scenario in past doesn't mean it was written in that era. Human minds can go beyond certain limits to predict the possibilities even a million years back.
@@saswatamondal8142astronomical dating specific event and to remember is hard Vedas is also Shruti ( heard knowledge) While remembering knowledge is smriti which is seprate section in Sankrit
@@saswatamondal8142 Its written in present tense in Vedas brother. On this day this star was here, this constallation was here etc. So its not like its describing these events as it was like that thousands of years ago.
The circular thing that you saw in battle is a real battle formation to encircle the enemy called "CHAKRAVYUH" and this formation is very deadly because to enter and get out of chakravyuh there is a specific strategy and if you don't know about that you will die like a dog (like trump said ) And that's how Abhimanyu the son of Arjuna (the guy that krishna speaks to in Bhagavad geeta ) dies. He was killed by his own relatives,grand gurus and cousins that's a very sad part of Mahabharata But at the end almost everyone died like a dog in Mahabharata😅. the clip that you watched you is probably from the hindi series called Mahabharat. It's one of the best mahabharat series ever and i think you should watch it is entertaining and its a little low budget and made in 2010 or something so don't expect really good vfx but it's okay content is what matter.
@@zuzanareacts dont watch that series from tv all are misleading if you want what exactly happen you have to read Ved Vyas mahabharat from gita press gorakhpur or from vivek obroy
Vedas weren't written 1500 years ago, Vedas were written before Ramayan, and Ramayan was happened before 14000 years ago. And you should watch Vineet Agrawal with podcasters to know Asura-Devas-Rakshasas
BTW, 'pada' or 'para' (as in padna or pad jana) also means falling down in Eastern Hindi and East Indian languages. The words Asura, Ahura and Ashura are used interchangeably. Watch how a Slovak woman marries an Indian and suffers... ua-cam.com/video/FCQ4TLDjRBw/v-deo.html
well it depends of course we have all kinds of people, it's more about how she thinks about things - like when she talks about why would I look at you different just because you are different, how she thought it was crazy what skin racisim is - that's what i mean
Suras are gods, Asuras are opposite to them. You add “a” to some words and you get opposite meaning. E.g. yogya means right, ayogya means wrong. Hence Asura I.e. opposite of the Suras (gods) by just adding “a” at the beginning.hence Asura not Ashura
In Sanskrit after mostly world we use : This is pronaunce as 'ah' Yog: = yogah = yoga But in hindi we remove : (ah) So this is only yog, karm, dharm, asur , krishn But in Sanskrit we use yogah, karmah,dharmah, krishnah But remember we don't use 'ah' in all Sanskrit world.
lol - if I was surviving on Indian views I'd be broke beyond. Fun fact just for giggles - in a year and half I have invested 10k euros of my own money into the channel - plus all of my hours that I spend researching, shooting editing, uploading on youtube commenting, etc that noone is paying me for. So far I may have 3,600 gross in my YT account - i emphasise GROSS! so maybe after taxes I could get to 2,500 euros - I think you are too clever to do the math so leave your ( imagine all curse words of this world) comments out of this channel you moron!
Don’t you think the theory that the Indo-European language originated in Russia is somewhat half-baked? Recent studies suggest that the Indo-European language originated in western Iran. Genetic studies have discovered a Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers component that spread to the steppe and a similar Iranian Neolithic component (in the Zagros) that spread eastward. This component was found in Bronze Age Anatolia without steppe ancestry. The Yamnaya were roughly 1/3 CHG or Iran_Neolithic. Iran_Neolithic ancestry comprises 40-60% of all modern Indians. Don’t you think Iranian Neolithic farmers migrated toward Russia around 7,000-8,000 years ago, forming the Yamnaya culture? Perhaps these people originated from Mehrgarh or Bhirrana in the Indian subcontinent, as India and Iran were better suited for human settlement 10,000 years ago than Russia, which experienced a cold and temperate climate heavily influenced by the last Ice Age. The cow is significant in Indo-Aryan culture. The Indo-Europeans were central to the domestication of the bull/cow, the invention of the wheeled wagon, dairying practices, and milk consumption. However, the cow was domesticated in the Indus Valley Civilization over 9,000 years ago and in Anatolia separately. If one believes the steppe people domesticated the horse and then entered India, this migration never affected the genetic lineage of Indian cow breeds. Cattle genetics conclusively prove that no admixture of Taurine cattle into India has ever occurred. It seems silly to think that Indo-Aryans came to India without a single cow. If we look at Russia, the Proto-Uralic language formed around the same time as the Indo-European language in relatively close proximity without any connection between them. In the Caucasus region or near the Black Sea, there are unrelated Kartvelian languages that formed around the same time or earlier than Indo-European. Do you think the Burushaski language in northern Pakistan might be related to a pre-Proto-Indo-European language, given that haplogroup R2 is significantly present among the Burusho people? Haplogroup R2 is estimated to have emerged around 15,000 years ago, likely in the Indian subcontinent, while R1 originated in Central Asia and R itself in West and South Asia. It seems likely that the Indo-European language originated in Iran, the Indus Valley, or the BMAC culture.
You know what this is very interesting. This channel made me start to look into our origins so i've been recently reading up a bit on this (still not sufficient). This is what I've discovered 1) there has been a genetic study in our region that confirmed that Slovak ethnicity is basically record setting in our area. over 80% of Slovak population have genes that go into 8000 years BC so people of this ethnic group have been here in neolit. 2) the whole nation migration theory from what I've been reading is being questioned as it'd been 3/4 centuries there'd would have to have been an exchange of there ethnic groups and providing all you know about Slaves is that they were farmers and that would not be not be able providing then condition able to happen that fast. Prokopis, Priskos, Ordanes and Simokrates in the 6th century were talking about Slavic land here on our territory. 3) I am not too sure if you have heard about Tartaria but from what I've been reading there has been an super old slavic 'something' that even spread to India and basically they are claiming all over the world. They are suggesting that Tamil work viyan-osani pronounces as vianose is basically Slovak Vianoce (Xmas). There are people that are looking at deciphering language and say that the first language was indo-slavic language. Further they go and explore the language and they say Haimalays is a old slavic word - where 'hima' in old slavic means winter and 'laya' - means continuous - so the continuous winter. Ladak.- comes from the old slavic word 'lad' - means ice/icy. They even talk about the Bhagavad Gita - that they broke down to mean God's knowledge. 4) Tartaria is meant to be a land somewhere around Russian -Siberian territory and I think around there it's believed that there was a civilisation that spread (There are even maps that shows Tartaria written and shouldn't be falsified). Interestingly enough they mentioned the Romanovs in Russia that burnt a lot of libraries in Russia. Then there is a book of Veles - which has history of slavic nations but apparently its regarded as false To which the author argues that there was a lot of book burning in the past and the convenient books were burnt and copied are not considered to be falsification. This books talks about ice age due to a catastrophe and apparently this made slavic people to move. 5) Another interesting thing I found daughter of Jaroslav I. Mudry (not too sure the translation but Mudry means wise) Anna, got married to a french king and when she came from Kiey Russia to Paris what has been discovered from her letters is that Paris was a "more expensive village". Hence, it comes to point out what she knew was much better. (Hence, where she came from seems more developed) So there is a lot of discussion in the book I've been reading about the fact that there was one civilisation super old slavic that spread all over and then from there things developed. They are trying to show it through linguistic influence. I'm not too sure what to believe to be honest as it does feel a bit far fetched. However, the only question what I've been asking is why has Slavic history been so suppressed? It is clear from what I've been reading there was a strong push from the church to eradicate all slavic - burning books and history - the main question is - why? if they were so irrelevant and idiotic as they have been described in the history, Romanias called Slavs speaking cattle!? e.g. there was a king Svatopluk in our history and there is Pope bull showing he allows christians in our territory to do church in their Slavic language - back then, it was latin, greek and roman and if a pope back then gave you this power to be able to do church in your own language that'd have to mean something very powerful. It was not normal and I saw that Franks and German 'tribes' were strongly against that (as they didn't have that - i.e. their language being used for church purposes). One thing is for sure, history is really not what we know and I guess we will never know the truth. I guess unless we get access to Vatican archives :D Finally, they are trying to insinuate in this book that Jesus was Slav and he came back to re-establish equality between old slavic ethnic groups with the Jews (The thing is all Slav like priests or sth of that sort is very similar to maybe like rishis in India - scientists, etc). There is a letter in the book ( where you can think about maybe it's authenticity of it's translation) that talks about Jesus from Publius Lentullius to cesar Tiberio where he described Jesus as someone with golden hair, high forehead, white skin. However, the main argument in the book is about his words on the cross (Eloi - eli - lan - asab - akta-ni) that have in 3 of his books of his followers (that form a part of the Bible) completely different translations (1, Dear God, why have you foresaken me, 2. It is done, 3. God, I give my spirit to your hands) and when looked at it form old slavic language they make sense. (Great, great, accept our deeds). They authors discuss, that none of his followers understood those words. So I don't know what to think and will continue to read other sources to see how things add or do not add up. The biggest question remains why has been slavic history so consistently eradicated and they were suppressed throughout millenia)?
True Fun fact primordial warfare of human in indo Iranians culture is battle against Danava Turria danus in Avestan And Danavas in RigVeda Turria ( Eurasian steppe ) in Avestan Danus ( associated with race ,river based name from river danu ) Danu= Danube, don ( steppe river ) , dienster river ( danu nazda originally) all etymological to danu Originally Aryans and steppe were enemy and eventually they admixtured (In myth Indra married to Danava princess sachi after deafeating Danava army and as treaty to bear non martial friendship between Aryas and danus ) In Avesta similar story Aryan culture possible originally related to southern central asia to indus region And people from this region Aryanized Eurasian and further more in Europe ( In purana metaphorically story Danava is race admixture of Rishi Kashyap and danu )
@@zuzanareactsour god Indra is mentioned killer of dasa , ahisuva , srbinda,pipru and further more names in RigVeda mentioned All these are related to ancient tribe Srbinda in southern slavic similar word is srbenda ( Serbs use this word till date for Nationalist person or their brave warriors) Vala(balto slavic veles ) is anti Aryans demon in RigVeda Indra and it's warriors were raiding people So if Invasion happened it could be consider from other side And we have this document because it was our ancestors who done this actions and documented in poetry which later known as Vedas We have common story in European paganism Old gods taken over by young raiding gods ( either newer descendants or foreign martials gods ) Not here in india Migration/ Invasion took place in Eurasia region
this is amazing i have no idea of this video i know few points shown in the video but many things are in details,and i always mentioned you slavs are our distant relatives its just european weather and water of caucus made you people white 🤣just live with pride zuzana we belong to the civilization that is base of everything in modern world,and one question do you people celebrate 25th december or you celebrate new year like russians
bless you! No, our main Xmas day is the 24th December and new year is 1st Jan :) - Russian/Orthodox Xmas is 6th January and new year a bit later - not too sure what date actually
पदा पद पाद में बहुत अंतर है भाई। Roman Script and Devnagri Script You are writing Hindi and Sanskrit in Roman Script. Plus Difference in pronounciation.
28:05
That's an ultimate military formation used to surround enemies called 'Chakravyuha'. Comes from Mahabharata in which only a few including Abhimanyu knew how to go inside the Circles with warriors at interleaving position in an increasingly tough position.
Almost impossible to break it.
so cool - thanks for sharing!
@@zuzanareacts@zuzanareacts hey Zuzana , You have reacted to nIlesh oak on beerbiceps podcast . Do you know , about his friend Rupa Bhaty , she has found that the Rig veda has memories as old as 200k years old, please react to Nilesh oak or Rupa Bhaty mam video .
Very very good video selection
24:00 but there was a little difference,
Iranians connoted the word "arya" with lineage or race,
Whereas Indians used the word "Arya" to denote the quality of a person and not his/her lineage, because in Sanskrit the word "Arya" means a Nobel person (in terms of morality) i.e. a person who possesses good moral values.
Yes exactly! For example, Ravana referred to himself as Arya, since he considered him to be superior in all qualities. Even Tara, the wife of Valli, addressed him as Arya, if I'm not wrong.
Recently got to saw a linguistic video linking Banjara tribes of India having 100+ similar words to Europe's Roma Gypsy. They were indeed indian origin but no such video was there comparing languages of desert tribes. And now thjs video linking Sanskrit to ethnic European languages is so wholesome. With time all such things vanish, just like we ourselves pick up trend words, genZ slangs etc.
Siberia- Kusa is hair/ cutter
Sanskrit - Kesh is hair
@@emotionalIntelligence2078 i don’t know much About the their langauge. Though there is defo comneftion with European languages
Sad to see different ancient Europeans cultures got eradicated.
yep
You can't imagine the hate we received in India and Nepal just because of our European ancestry.
Culture is an excuse just for the elite to control the sheep.
We need to move beyond culture, towards ethics only.
The amount of hate in india is too much that you just can't tolerate If I pronounce it
@@zuzanareacts hey Zuzana , You have reacted to nIlesh oak on beerbiceps podcast . Do you know , about his friend Rupa Bhaty , she has found that the Rig veda has memories as old as 200k years old, please react to Nilesh oak or Rupa Bhaty mam video .
As always very informative video,thanks ❤
Thanks for watching!
Thanks for bringing this! I had sanskrut as optional language during high school for 3 years. It was very repititive to learn those verbs in different forms.
I was going to recommend you this video but Zuzana is lightning fast ⚡
@@martin96991 I’m not this video has been actually recommends a while back 🙈
Thank you for good informative video @@zuzanareacts
thank you for watching :)
@@zuzanareacts check this
@zuzanareacts hey Zuzana , You have reacted to nIlesh oak on beerbiceps podcast . Do you know , about his friend Rupa Bhaty , she has found that the Rig veda has memories as old as 200k years old, please react to Nilesh oak or Rupa Bhaty mam video .
Great vid zuzana❣️🤗
happy you liked it
@@zuzanareacts🥰❣️
Great video 😍
Thank you! 🤗
'Wagen' in 'German' means 'Bahan' in 'Sanskrit'
In Sanskrit there are 4 sounds of each letter.
For example : For 't' letter there are 'ta', 'tha', 'da', 'Dha'
'Pata' in Sanskrit also means Fall just like you said in 4:44. 'Patha' means Path and 'Pada' means foot.
thanks for shraing!
T and D each have four different letters
Soft T (त), Soft T aspirated (थ),
Hard T (ट), Hard T aspirated (ठ)
Likewise,
Soft D (द), Soft D aspirated (ध),
Hard D (ड), Hard D aspirated (ढ)
And then there are retroflex variants of Hard D (ड़) and Hard D aspirated (ढ़)
I agree with creator of this video that Sanskrit is mother of 'many' languages and that may mean it isn't mother of all languages.
In ancient Iranian the Sanskrit 'S' becomes 'H'..!! Therefore Ahura as in Ahura Mazda is in fact Asura Matsa to the vedics! While similarly Indra Deva of the vedics is in fact Daeva Inthra of the Iranian..!!
That Battle formation is called the 'Chakravyuha' the most famous manifestation of which is in the episode involving Abhimanyu in the Mahabharata..!! You can google it for more details..!! And yes, in the video it is AI generated.!!
27:37 ashura used as we speak those in frequency of English
But really it is ashur
Many other are, yoga-yog , Krishna-krishn , Rama-Ram and many more
If you are talking about Hindi, this is correct, but not for Sanskrit. There is generally a long 'ā' and a short 'a'. For example Rāma (pronounced as Raama). People speaking different languages change this to Rām, Rāmā, etc. but the correct Sanskrit pronunciation, which should also be used in English, is Rāma.
@kaushiksunapu5657 I think you don't have good knowledge about letter of devanagari lippi and roman letters
Here people used long a not the short one to complete the letter Ram is correct not Rama
Swastik is found in most parts of the world. Swastik must have been very important symbol.
The Vedic Sanskrit was relevant for the Vedic and Tantric Mantras (not for the Sabari Mantras) and also for the rhyming they used to do back in the days for making such large poems and making much more philosophical way of explaining some things.
Classical Sanskrit is primarily based on the Communication and used in the texts that did not had much poetic nature and hence wasn't much philosophical as compared to the Vedic texts. So the Classical Sanskrit caused a bit problem in the definitions of certain words that were being used in the Vedas (and all of its additional components), that led to the misinterpretation of the Hymns from the Vedas by newer generation. And unfortunately it became a primary reason for the defamation of some parts of the Vedas in public that never got any guru to explain its meaning since it was too philosophical as compared to the Classical texts.
thanks for sharing!
I would also suggest you to the 4000 years old history of Indian Pariah Dog By Project Shivoham That talks about the spiritual significance of dogs in civilisations its a must watch
I like that you are including Slovakian history culture and perspective in your recent videos. ❤️
@@veernair glad to hear. I never thought people would be that interested
@@zuzanareactsyou have visited india and might notice that people are interested in knowing others, so if possible do add more about your culture and country.
I'm very impressed 😊😊😊😊
Fascinating Video!! I think he has made another very interesting video on the origin of Hindi
Glad you liked it
Certain parts of Sandhya Vandana I offer, are in Vedic Sanskrit and the rest in Sanskrit.
26:42 Asur is Hindi pronunciation and Asura is Sanskrit
It is considered to be mother of all languages of the world, there are many proofs, facts and evidences in the support of this argument.
Sanskrit is considered to be the second oldest language of the world. Tamil is considered to be the oldest language of the world.
But there is a confusion, some other foreign historians claim that there are some other world languages which are slightly older than Sanskrit and Tamil. I don't know whom to believe. There are different opinions and views across th world about the oldest languages of the world.
Asura literally means non-rythmic or chaotic while sura (another name for Devas) mean rhythmic or orderly being. One is driven by desire for war and chaos. Its similar to the concept of chaotic beings and orderly beings known as Asiers and Vanirs in Norse mythology. Description of Asura that we know are beings that driven by the desire for war and chaos. They believe their pupose to be here is to fight againt evil but what is evil in their eyes are the very governing laws of this universe that gives it it's purpose or identity (aka the devas). Its hard to explain everything here but yeah... that's the surface level stuff basically.
@@alekhsingh9970 very interesting to me in fact it talks about the dual nature of the universe and both together are forces of creation
100 percentage Right ❤
in classical Sanskrit 'Hrudai' is the heart...the last few pictures you showed of the Slovak chakras the center one near the heart was called 'Hurd'.
4:46 the word for falling in telugu is 'Padadam'( with hard d's), which is funnily pretty similar to what you said😅
@@kaushiksunapu5657 yep super similar!
Brave hindu warriors had protected their culture. Europe failed to do so.
But thanks to separation of Religion-&-State, Europe created the modern world.
All modern ideas & innovation, thanks to abandoning archaic cultures.
That's why they destroy culture and killed problems 😊
Assura (In Vedas)
Ahurra( In Avestan)
"S" changes to "H"
But sometimes they also use "Ashura"
"Sapta Sindhu"
"Hapta Hindu"
@@user-cl9bd1tz3b thanks 🙏
10:18 the things with German is (I'm also do speak the language btw), several words are combined in a way to form composita, but that leads to the formation of extremely long words altogether. In Sanskrit, while it shares the quality of composita, it also compresses the words in a way that much more information can be packed using a few alphabets.
@@kaushiksunapu5657 all in all Sanskrit is better 😂🙈
It's asur like the other words mantr yog etc but when they speak these words in English they put extra a ( I don't know why) which becomes asuras mantra and yoga in english
The circular battle formation is the most popular formation in Mahabharat battle and other bharat battle
It is mentioned as chakra viyuh in warfare chapters and books
western use a in words like real word is karm =karm(a),asur=asur(a),ramayan=ramayan(a)
Both languages are indo european proto baltic lannguages there is also similarity with lithuania
very interesting video
Glad you liked it
Asur and Asura are just alternate spellings of each other both can be used in exchanged.
Heard that Sunita Williams in the space station is Slovak-Indian.
*Asura* = Vedic languages _mostly referring to negative and even dem0nic energies_
*Ashura* = Avestan based languages _referring to divine energies_
Politics lead to divergence in worshipping patterns, in fact just inverse of "gods" and "demons" in each others traditions
I see - thank you!
Their is no mentioned in Vedas negetive about asur but in puranas
In English, Yog becomes Yoga, Asur becomes Asura, Dev become Deva, and so on. But the actual pronunciation in Yog, Asur, Dev, etc.
The followers of the Zoroastrian religion are called Parsis as they came from Persia now Iran. They are one of the most successful and peace loving people you will ever come across.
One of the most famous Parsis was Sir Ratan Tata.
why do you skip the involvement in opium trade and British loyalists part?
In Telugu Pada has same meaning, But the Words has few more letters " Padatam."
Hindi - Asur
Sanskrit - Asura
There is also a langugage like more pure sanskrit, previous to sanskrit, the chando basha, its like from which sanskrit, welsh and more languages are made. Chandobhasha, mother of sanskrit and western languages has more content of sanskrit. more purer form. vedic books were written in chandobhasha, eg rig veda, and 3 more books, and its 100,000 yrs old and its not a joke..
This video took me back to my school days.
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
God bless you, Zuzana
❤❤❤
Interesting
Yes they always add A at the end in a translation like we say mahabharat but translation mahabharata, we call Ram but translation Rama , similarly we say Ved but translation Veda ! Almost every translation has this ! I Do not know someone explain please if someone knows ..🙏
🙏🏽🇸🇷🙏🏽🕉️🙏🏽
Actually in Deepest Water's he might will talk about that Veda's were not composed in 1,500 BCE specifically Rig Veda was not composed in 1,500 BCE but 3,000 BCE You Remember that Dashrajnya "Battle of 10 Kings" yeah that happened somewhere around that period now how did we reach this conclusion well it's something Historian's and Linguistic Experts have something to do With but after that war all the defeated Tribes moved to different Regions and Settled and One of those Tribe's Remenant were Found as Mittani Kingdom established in 1,500 BCE and their ancestors used to speak Sanskrit one of the Mittani King's daughter was Married to some Egyptian King and the other Linguistic Tribes who moved formed Greeks and all now that's where Indo-European Debate, debate about god's and Aryan Migration theory Starts, so it's clear that if Mittani's were present there along the way at 1,500 BCE and their Ancestors of Mittani's who lived way before 1,800 BCE who used to speak Sanskrit which is Actually the Vedic Sanskrit used in last part or newly introduced Rig Vedic Books The old Books of Rig Veda has totally Different Form of Sanskrit and it shows that these people who we call Mittani came there very long ago that no one can properly date similarly same is for Greeks and other tribes but Genetic Lineage has nothing to do with Language because language can be adopted and Genes only carry via Reproduction so the Proto Indo-Iranian languages that they used to speak turned out with their little variations into new languages somehow
you know, I've just been reading about MIttani and you are here writing about it - spooky AF!
@zuzanareacts ua-cam.com/video/J63Udr_cuaA/v-deo.htmlsi=04uNjF4AMxkllmKt
This video will help you understand everything about Rig Veda He is a Linguist from India Shrikant Talegeri you can understand the Indian side of story from this video Although I don't think it's that easy to understand the whole debate with few videos rather Indo-European language model itself is flawed and every year a New Research paper pops up regarding the Origin of Indo-European languages last time it was"Language trees with sampled ancestors support a hybrid model for the origin of Indo-European languages" by Paul Heggarty, published in Science in 2023 ¹.
thanks!
@@zuzanareacts ua-cam.com/users/livenntR_VWJ6Fc?si=Gp5tUP2B28vQ9aNi
This one also it gives better explanation as it's in podcast form
@@zuzanareactsmittanis originally called themselves Marya ( mortals)
Marya mentioned as warband of god Indra who were raiding warriors
Marya associated with young warriors and originally to gandhara ( eastern Afghanistan) region in RigVeda
The timelines mentioned in the video have no basis, eg. Vedas were written in 1500 BC. These dates were given by British or European Indologists & is an effort to synchronize with Biblical creation in 4004 BC. There are many efforts to date Vedas based on the descriptions in it, eg. Dried Saraswati River. Many scientists believe Vedas are 7000 - 9000 years old. As per Indian literature, Vedas were written by Veda Vyāsa at the time of MahāBhārata war 5000 years ago & till then, it was transmitted through generations orally.
BTW that clip 🐠 and arrow is from arjun the warrior prince the best animation movie done in india
interesting
It is called ASURA
ASHURA is how Iranians speak it.
@@martin96991 I see thanks!
@@zuzanareacts usually we do not say Asura in India ! We say Asur but idk why they add A at the end of every translation ! Some examples are like :- mahabharat-mahabharata , Ved-Veda , Dev-Deva, Swastik-Swastika and many more ...
@@DrParasitesnot all indians speak hindi. Search up ‘schwa deletion’ and you’ll have your answer.
@@DrParasites they add A because that's how it's spoken in VEDIC SANSKRIT originally.
❤❤❤❤
Zuzana pl come to India in occasion of Kumbha Mela. I will go to Kumbha Mela on 09/02/2025.
Slovak number system is also taken by sankrit ek, do , teen char , paach , chau ,saat aath , nau , dus
@zuzanareacts the word "pada" means rhe foot here so you see the similarity?
He just explained there no s in persian Or older lamguages soma as homa sindhu as hindu asura as ashura. It's mahabarata you have to learn about chakraview to know about this battle formation.
@@saibalbh31 ❤️❤️❤️
It's funny that I'm Fijian south Indian but I look like middle eastern 😂😂😂❤
Please react on Indian(Hindu) resistance against ISLAM and Christianity in Vishuddhi films in English
i also dont know english because of these tense 😅. we never speak right english {with formulas}
haha - I cannot blame you for me it really only sank in when I lived there for long enough :)
asur, and ashura are the same, its pronunciation difference. ashura in english, and asur in hindi.
Please react on Swastika documentary by AKTK
I think I did in the past - check out my old videos :)
@zuzanareacts Sorry
Jay Hind.
7:06 just want to correct this guy. with the recent combination of astronomical and archiological research. Vedas are minimum 1,00,000 years old. As the astronomical details available in Vedas are only possible before 100,000 years. like polar stars, dhumketu etc.
If a book is predicting a scenario in past doesn't mean it was written in that era. Human minds can go beyond certain limits to predict the possibilities even a million years back.
@@saswatamondal8142astronomical dating specific event and to remember is hard
Vedas is also Shruti ( heard knowledge)
While remembering knowledge is smriti which is seprate section in Sankrit
@@saswatamondal8142 Its written in present tense in Vedas brother. On this day this star was here, this constallation was here etc. So its not like its describing these events as it was like that thousands of years ago.
The circular thing that you saw in battle is a real battle formation to encircle the enemy called "CHAKRAVYUH" and this formation is very deadly because to enter and get out of chakravyuh there is a specific strategy and if you don't know about that you will die like a dog (like trump said ) And that's how Abhimanyu the son of Arjuna (the guy that krishna speaks to in Bhagavad geeta ) dies. He was killed by his own relatives,grand gurus and cousins that's a very sad part of Mahabharata But at the end almost everyone died like a dog in Mahabharata😅. the clip that you watched you is probably from the hindi series called Mahabharat. It's one of the best mahabharat series ever and i think you should watch it is entertaining and its a little low budget and made in 2010 or something so don't expect really good vfx but it's okay content is what matter.
amazing!
@@zuzanareacts dont watch that series from tv all are misleading if you want what exactly happen you have to read Ved Vyas mahabharat from gita press gorakhpur or from vivek obroy
Slavic people also very good hearted people ❤ but we all support talented person not skin , not racist as a human being
indeed this is how it should be
Vedas weren't written 1500 years ago, Vedas were written before Ramayan, and Ramayan was happened before 14000 years ago.
And you should watch Vineet Agrawal with podcasters to know Asura-Devas-Rakshasas
*When he say "ashura", he is talking about persian god. When he say "Asura", he is talking about Hindu demon.*
BTW, 'pada' or 'para' (as in padna or pad jana) also means falling down in Eastern Hindi and East Indian languages. The words Asura, Ahura and Ashura are used interchangeably. Watch how a Slovak woman marries an Indian and suffers... ua-cam.com/video/FCQ4TLDjRBw/v-deo.html
thanks! I watched that video - very many good things she has said there. So if you want to understand a bit Slovak mentality she is a good example.
@@zuzanareacts Very simplistic, very direct, very clear. (Humourless?)
well it depends of course we have all kinds of people, it's more about how she thinks about things - like when she talks about why would I look at you different just because you are different, how she thought it was crazy what skin racisim is - that's what i mean
Swa's'+Asti'+Ka = self manifested, with enablers (s) for all K'inetic energy motions and actions (K'aam K'arm root is K)
Suras are gods, Asuras are opposite to them. You add “a” to some words and you get opposite meaning. E.g. yogya means right, ayogya means wrong. Hence Asura I.e. opposite of the Suras (gods) by just adding “a” at the beginning.hence Asura not Ashura
interesting -thanks for sharing!
Asur plural is asuras
In Sanskrit after mostly world we use :
This is pronaunce as 'ah'
Yog: = yogah = yoga
But in hindi we remove : (ah)
So this is only yog, karm, dharm, asur , krishn
But in Sanskrit we use yogah, karmah,dharmah, krishnah
But remember we don't use 'ah' in all Sanskrit world.
It is mhabharat seen
Do react to Part 2 of this too.
is there one - I thought it was just this one?
@zuzanareacts You are right. It seems he is yet to put it out . Waiting .
Sanatan dharma is spritual leader ❤🚩🕉️🇮🇳..
Foreigners are literally surving on Indian views 🤡🤡🤡🤡
lol - if I was surviving on Indian views I'd be broke beyond. Fun fact just for giggles - in a year and half I have invested 10k euros of my own money into the channel - plus all of my hours that I spend researching, shooting editing, uploading on youtube commenting, etc that noone is paying me for. So far I may have 3,600 gross in my YT account - i emphasise GROSS! so maybe after taxes I could get to 2,500 euros - I think you are too clever to do the math so leave your ( imagine all curse words of this world) comments out of this channel you moron!
@@zuzanareactsyour efforts, your money and importantly your time is much appreciated 🙂
thanks! ❤
❤️❤️❤️🌹🌹🌹🌹
There ll be a Part 2 for deepest waters
African laguages are the mother of all languages
Swastka has been found all around world even latin america.
Asura == Ashura
same thing
in hindi lang, asur and in sanskrit , asura
If you will come & make video about Kumbha Mela, your views will increase . You will also get a topic for research about Sanatan.
Soora means 👉 with positive divine powers & asoora means 👉 not with positive divine powers 🙄🙄
All Bhartiya languages are directly derived from Sanskrit. don't try to separate Dakshin Bhartiya n languages.
26:29
Asur (असुर) _ Hindi
Asurah (असुर:) _ Sanskrit
Iran oldest countries
NEXT VIDEO - DHANURVEDA BY PROJECT SHIVOHAM
Can you add Turkish language in caption
Don’t you think the theory that the Indo-European language originated in Russia is somewhat half-baked? Recent studies suggest that the Indo-European language originated in western Iran. Genetic studies have discovered a Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers component that spread to the steppe and a similar Iranian Neolithic component (in the Zagros) that spread eastward. This component was found in Bronze Age Anatolia without steppe ancestry.
The Yamnaya were roughly 1/3 CHG or Iran_Neolithic. Iran_Neolithic ancestry comprises 40-60% of all modern Indians. Don’t you think Iranian Neolithic farmers migrated toward Russia around 7,000-8,000 years ago, forming the Yamnaya culture? Perhaps these people originated from Mehrgarh or Bhirrana in the Indian subcontinent, as India and Iran were better suited for human settlement 10,000 years ago than Russia, which experienced a cold and temperate climate heavily influenced by the last Ice Age.
The cow is significant in Indo-Aryan culture. The Indo-Europeans were central to the domestication of the bull/cow, the invention of the wheeled wagon, dairying practices, and milk consumption. However, the cow was domesticated in the Indus Valley Civilization over 9,000 years ago and in Anatolia separately. If one believes the steppe people domesticated the horse and then entered India, this migration never affected the genetic lineage of Indian cow breeds. Cattle genetics conclusively prove that no admixture of Taurine cattle into India has ever occurred. It seems silly to think that Indo-Aryans came to India without a single cow.
If we look at Russia, the Proto-Uralic language formed around the same time as the Indo-European language in relatively close proximity without any connection between them. In the Caucasus region or near the Black Sea, there are unrelated Kartvelian languages that formed around the same time or earlier than Indo-European.
Do you think the Burushaski language in northern Pakistan might be related to a pre-Proto-Indo-European language, given that haplogroup R2 is significantly present among the Burusho people? Haplogroup R2 is estimated to have emerged around 15,000 years ago, likely in the Indian subcontinent, while R1 originated in Central Asia and R itself in West and South Asia. It seems likely that the Indo-European language originated in Iran, the Indus Valley, or the BMAC culture.
You know what this is very interesting. This channel made me start to look into our origins so i've been recently reading up a bit on this (still not sufficient).
This is what I've discovered
1) there has been a genetic study in our region that confirmed that Slovak ethnicity is basically record setting in our area. over 80% of Slovak population have genes that go into 8000 years BC so people of this ethnic group have been here in neolit.
2) the whole nation migration theory from what I've been reading is being questioned as it'd been 3/4 centuries there'd would have to have been an exchange of there ethnic groups and providing all you know about Slaves is that they were farmers and that would not be not be able providing then condition able to happen that fast. Prokopis, Priskos, Ordanes and Simokrates in the 6th century were talking about Slavic land here on our territory.
3) I am not too sure if you have heard about Tartaria but from what I've been reading there has been an super old slavic 'something' that even spread to India and basically they are claiming all over the world. They are suggesting that Tamil work viyan-osani pronounces as vianose is basically Slovak Vianoce (Xmas). There are people that are looking at deciphering language and say that the first language was indo-slavic language. Further they go and explore the language and they say Haimalays is a old slavic word - where 'hima' in old slavic means winter and 'laya' - means continuous - so the continuous winter. Ladak.- comes from the old slavic word 'lad' - means ice/icy. They even talk about the Bhagavad Gita - that they broke down to mean God's knowledge.
4) Tartaria is meant to be a land somewhere around Russian -Siberian territory and I think around there it's believed that there was a civilisation that spread (There are even maps that shows Tartaria written and shouldn't be falsified). Interestingly enough they mentioned the Romanovs in Russia that burnt a lot of libraries in Russia. Then there is a book of Veles - which has history of slavic nations but apparently its regarded as false To which the author argues that there was a lot of book burning in the past and the convenient books were burnt and copied are not considered to be falsification. This books talks about ice age due to a catastrophe and apparently this made slavic people to move.
5) Another interesting thing I found daughter of Jaroslav I. Mudry (not too sure the translation but Mudry means wise) Anna, got married to a french king and when she came from Kiey Russia to Paris what has been discovered from her letters is that Paris was a "more expensive village". Hence, it comes to point out what she knew was much better. (Hence, where she came from seems more developed)
So there is a lot of discussion in the book I've been reading about the fact that there was one civilisation super old slavic that spread all over and then from there things developed. They are trying to show it through linguistic influence. I'm not too sure what to believe to be honest as it does feel a bit far fetched.
However, the only question what I've been asking is why has Slavic history been so suppressed? It is clear from what I've been reading there was a strong push from the church to eradicate all slavic - burning books and history - the main question is - why? if they were so irrelevant and idiotic as they have been described in the history, Romanias called Slavs speaking cattle!? e.g. there was a king Svatopluk in our history and there is Pope bull showing he allows christians in our territory to do church in their Slavic language - back then, it was latin, greek and roman and if a pope back then gave you this power to be able to do church in your own language that'd have to mean something very powerful. It was not normal and I saw that Franks and German 'tribes' were strongly against that (as they didn't have that - i.e. their language being used for church purposes).
One thing is for sure, history is really not what we know and I guess we will never know the truth. I guess unless we get access to Vatican archives :D
Finally, they are trying to insinuate in this book that Jesus was Slav and he came back to re-establish equality between old slavic ethnic groups with the Jews (The thing is all Slav like priests or sth of that sort is very similar to maybe like rishis in India - scientists, etc). There is a letter in the book ( where you can think about maybe it's authenticity of it's translation) that talks about Jesus from Publius Lentullius to cesar Tiberio where he described Jesus as someone with golden hair, high forehead, white skin. However, the main argument in the book is about his words on the cross (Eloi - eli - lan - asab - akta-ni) that have in 3 of his books of his followers (that form a part of the Bible) completely different translations (1, Dear God, why have you foresaken me, 2. It is done, 3. God, I give my spirit to your hands) and when looked at it form old slavic language they make sense. (Great, great, accept our deeds). They authors discuss, that none of his followers understood those words.
So I don't know what to think and will continue to read other sources to see how things add or do not add up. The biggest question remains why has been slavic history so consistently eradicated and they were suppressed throughout millenia)?
True
Fun fact primordial warfare of human in indo Iranians culture is battle against Danava
Turria danus in Avestan
And Danavas in RigVeda
Turria ( Eurasian steppe ) in Avestan
Danus ( associated with race ,river based name from river danu )
Danu= Danube, don ( steppe river ) , dienster river ( danu nazda originally) all etymological to danu
Originally Aryans and steppe were enemy and eventually they admixtured
(In myth Indra married to Danava princess sachi after deafeating Danava army and as treaty to bear non martial friendship between Aryas and danus )
In Avesta similar story
Aryan culture possible originally related to southern central asia to indus region
And people from this region Aryanized Eurasian and further more in Europe
( In purana metaphorically story Danava is race admixture of Rishi Kashyap and danu )
@@zuzanareactsour god Indra is mentioned killer of dasa , ahisuva , srbinda,pipru and further more names in RigVeda mentioned
All these are related to ancient tribe
Srbinda in southern slavic similar word is srbenda ( Serbs use this word till date for Nationalist person or their brave warriors)
Vala(balto slavic veles ) is anti Aryans demon in RigVeda
Indra and it's warriors were raiding people
So if Invasion happened it could be consider from other side
And we have this document because it was our ancestors who done this actions and documented in poetry which later known as Vedas
We have common story in European paganism
Old gods taken over by young raiding gods ( either newer descendants or foreign martials gods )
Not here in india
Migration/ Invasion took place in Eurasia region
interesting!
he is wrong about dating of vedas
Who believes that God gives knowledge to mankind. Not any book
patha in sanskrit is fall too
this is amazing i have no idea of this video i know few points shown in the video but many things are in details,and i always mentioned you slavs are our distant relatives its just european weather and water of caucus made you people white 🤣just live with pride zuzana we belong to the civilization that is base of everything in modern world,and one question do you people celebrate 25th december or you celebrate new year like russians
bless you! No, our main Xmas day is the 24th December and new year is 1st Jan :) - Russian/Orthodox Xmas is 6th January and new year a bit later - not too sure what date actually
Try to learn sanskrit if you can.
There probably will be part 2 of this video ...
Asuras are not bad in vedas. Stupid modern scholars donot know.
Pada in Sanskrit- foot, Pada in Hindi- FART! 🤣
lol
पदा
पद
पाद में बहुत अंतर है भाई।
Roman Script and Devnagri Script
You are writing Hindi and Sanskrit in Roman Script.
Plus Difference in pronounciation.
In hindi we called name as Ram, asur, narender
Whereas when we called this name in English a is added in the back and called as
Rama, adhura, Narendra
thanks!