To be fair, Toby was nowhere near experienced in killing as Todd was, and based on the bloodflow he didn't cut that deep. Todd was probably alive for a while after his throat was cut, waiting to bleed out, so he could still hold Lucy. Creepy as that is.
My theory is that Mrs. Lovett is the one who poisoned Lucy. How else would Lovett know exactly what happened to Lucy. It also explains why The Begger Woman(Lucy) is suspicious of Mrs. Lovett and calls her a witch/the Devils wife.
also it's funny that the young and the old grindelwald are friends in this movie. we just need ezra, dolores and greyback's actor to make the list full.
Lucy *could* have told Lovett what happened to her after she returned home from seeing the judge. She would have been distraught and might have related it to her landlady (Lovett) in a moment of dispair. Many rape victims do tell someone they trust because it's too heavy a burden to keep to themselves. But because Victorian mores would have caused Lovett to tell Lucy to keep it to herself from now on and never admit to anyone that it happened, I can see how it would have eventually eaten away at Lucy. With no husband to support her and a child to raise, facing poverty and possibly losing her home, having no friends or family she could turn to for help, Lucy breaks down and poisons herself rather than go on living. There is nothing to suggest she poisoned herself immediately after the judge's attack right there in his own house. She was incapacitated and probably unable to do anything immediately
This is actually a happy ending if you think about it. The three innocent characters (besides Lucy) lived. Toby Anthony and Johanna all live while all the characters (again. Besides Lucy) who’ve done wrong get the death they deserve
Nobody ever seems to mention the massive plot hole behind the trapdoor chair. It apparently leads straight down into the basement/cellar portion of the building yet no, the barber chair's location is right above the indoor dining area of Mrs. Lovett cafe. It literally cannot work.
The purse isn't a plot hole. When Mrs. Lovett took it off the dead body they weren't planning to keep Toby around indefinitely, they were just going to get him drunk and then presumably send him on his way (he wasn't there when they were planning how to dispose of the dead bodies). Afterward, he came to work for her, but that was when well after they had the trap door installed and had been able to expand the business to include not only indoor but outdoor seating, which doesn't happen overnight. It was likely 2-3 months between when they started their cannibalism business until Toby was there regularly because they were comfortable enough that Mrs. Lovett was thinking of using the money they were making to take a trip. It's not only possible but completely plausible that with the passage of time she forgot that, oh yeah, this purse came from Toby's former boss, obviously he would recognize it and she should get rid of it.
I’m supprised you never mentioned the fact that in this version we never learn what happens to Joanna and Anthony Or how technically sweeny is killing people in front of a massive window Or how nobody else figured out the people into pies thing since Toby picked a freaking thumb of of the pie he ate
I watched this movie at 11 with no parent present just me and my girlfriend (at the time) hanging out in her stepmoms basement watching an r rated movie... fun times
There was a reason why Johnny couldn't sing it was because his daughter was sick in the hospital for two weeks so they didn't have time to do the ballad. They planned to even have Christopher Lee to be in it. It was supposed to be a graveyard with the spirits of Sweeney's victims sinning together. It was meant to be the opening.
I think they changed the opening, because the graveyard scene would have been very similar to the opening number of Elisabeth, a musical that never made it to Broadway or Westend, but is popular enough in mainland Europe and Japan that copying it (whether intentionally or coincidentally) would have been a bad look for the Sweeney Todd movie.
I like the movie, althought it wasn't perfect. I like how they showed some traits of the characters just with pictures and some of their gestures. Like the judge, who we learn is a disturbing perverted man through lovett's song but also through the decorations in his room and his habbit of spying on joanna. Still, some of sweeney's actions weren't exactly smart. He could have gotten his revenge and his daughter had he only been smarter and faster in his actions. He had the judge on silver plate but instead of killing him when turpin had let his guard down, todd starts shaving him and wasting time singing. He could have handled the situation with pirelli much calmer too, but he panicked and acted stupidly by killing him in such a messy way while pirelli's servant boy was downstairs and could have heard everything. Another thing I have an issue with is lovett's harley quinish love for sweeney. she cared only for him, and didn't care about his family. she could have go with his wife that night she went to turpin's house, or perhaps warn her not to go, since she obviously knew what was up; after lucy poisoned herself and turpin took her kid, lovett did nothing to stop him, instead of hidding the baby she hid sweeney's silver razors, yet later in the film she acts so motherly to all kids she see and even hints that she wouldn't mind becoming joana's stepmother to care for her. seems fishy. Regardless of its issues, I still love the musical numbers and the movie as a whole. And I thing Helena did a great job as mrs lovett.
Well that's the point of Mrs. Lovett. She let Barker's family be taken in hopes that one day he would come back and spend his life with her. That's why she kept the razors. It wasn't a smart plan obviously though because he ended up just becoming obsessed with revenge.
one thing they did with the music that i didn’t like is when sweeney todd kills lucy. the loud dramatic music was appropriate if the audience already knew it was lucy. but since the audience doesn’t find out its lucy until the last 5 minutes of the movie, the background music is like a spoiler. when i first watched the movie i was like “wait whats with the music? the begger woman wasnt a really important character. its no different from killing perelli or anything”
If you listened closely to the music, it revealed the beggar was the wife as soon as she appeared in the film. The background music that plays when the beggar appears is only used at one other place in the movie: at the masquerade party. It’s really interesting how much is straight up spoiled by the songs. Look up Sideways’ Sweeny Todd musical analysis. He explains a lot of this.
I love this film, but I've always had one gripe with the obsession Antony shows with Joanna. While I recognize that it's Joanna's way out more so than a star-crossed love affair for her, but good god Romeo would tell Antony to slow down and ease up! That's how I first viewed his feelings for Joanna, and that's bad enough, but when you really think about it, the whole romance plot (for Antony's part at least) isn't even that deep. Romeo and Juliet is about two people who basically risk it all and pay the price for puppy love, but at least they met and spoke face-to-face before they jumped into romance, and even Juliet makes good points that show she wasn't entirely on board from the get-go entirely. Juliet was the more mature of the pair, and so too is Joanna, albeit for different reasons, but they are both still naïve. More to the point, this kind of shows that in the end, the fundamental problem comes back around to a key word I used earlier: Obsession. Antony is a young man, likely barely into his early twenties at oldest, and while he has traveled the world to an extent given his occupation as a sailor, he is not exactly a worldly man, nor is he experienced with romance or interacting with women, especially since his occupation was a strictly all-male profession in that time period. I may digress a touch, but I think it still remains germane to my overall point. He sees a pretty girl and his mind immediately conjures fantasies of whisking Joanna away to somewhere safe and distant where they can be together for the rest of their days. He is clearly an emotionally immature romantic idealist, but his behaviors strike me as more obsessed with Joanna, especially considering she may not actually feel the same way for him, but recognizes the opportunity to escape the malevolence that otherwise surrounds her. While I wouldn't say that Antony's intent or the way he views Joanna is meant to be predatory, but it certainly comes across that way from any perspective I can imagine outside of Antony's mindset. His feelings and deeds are on an even more base level than those of Romeo's, and he is just as immature, if not more so. Romeo's feelings were at least driven by an established habit of his in regards to falling in love and often getting his heart broken because of the emotionally precarious positions he puts himself in even prior to his meeting Juliet, so his attraction to Juliet is shown to be his pattern. Prior to his attraction to Antony, we have no real sense of who he is as a person beyond being young and also that he is suddenly in love because, "Girl pretty." To a degree this is true of Romeo as well, but that's my point. In the end Romeo and Juliet provides a great example as to what kind of attraction shouldn't be gambled on when one's entire life is the asking price. With Antony and Joanna, it's far more complicated than that for her, and even less understandable for his part given he has spent precisely zero amount of time with her and getting to know her. Say what you will for Romeo and Juliet, at least they had spoken to one another before they both decided to go headlong into their developing relationship. I could continue with this and give detailed points about how Romeo is also more complex in regards to his quickness to anger and even outright murder by way of dueling, and having done so in revenge for the death of someone close to him, showing that he isn't just some ideal cute boy from next door type and even shows Juliet is conflicted in just how to view her new lover as a person, and not just a man. However, if I did so beyond this point my little diatribe here would be a full-length novel lol While she is ultimately undeterred, she does take a brief moment's pause nonetheless. Antony shows an obsession that is likely one-sided as all get-out and his actions only show how far that obsession goes, but don't indicate anything else beyond that point. He is a character defined and driven by his attraction alone, but shows no other tell-tale traits that don't revolve around this, or at least not enough of them to give us a sense of who he is beyond that. He is young and depending on how you look at it, not truly in love. He is obsessed, and Joanna is desperate to be free of her captor. It's really on the whole not much deeper than that. Obsession isn't the same thing as love or even a crush. Love or a crush isn't always reciprocated and at least for one person usually means knowing who their love/crush is beyond more than someone they see in a window for five seconds. Beyond, "girl pretty," what is there really to love about Joanna? She doesn't really show much in the way of character traits considering she isn't really given any chance to. In a way, one could argue that she is treated as little more than a prize to be fought for as opposed to a developed character in her own right. Basically, this lack of development and Antony's obsession serve as a big old red flag and as a how-not-to in regards to infatuation and obsession just as much as Romeo and Juliet is for puppy love between two young and immature individuals. Both tales serve as a warning sign for their respective viewpoints, but they in and of themselves aren't warnings of the same thing as they may seem at first glance on the surface.
I agree with all your points. I also hate it when he says he’ll “steal her” away... why not “rescue”? Is it he is objectifying her as well? (Albeit on another perhaps more innocent level). Poor thing indeed, her and Toby are the two with the truly sad storylines. All the adults around them acting a fool. (Like Joanna’s mom for instance.... why would you attempt suicide with a little baby that needs you?)
@@walterwhite4862 I guess they were going for a Romeo-esque outlook for the character in the sense that he has an immature understanding of what love is as opposed to infatuation. If that's the case, I can understand that and let some of it slide, but I think for me it's just a bit much and creeps me out a bit either way. I'm probably overanalyzing it anyway lol
@@loneronin6813 It is purposefully a bit creepy. His instantaneous obsession with Johanna is meant to mirror Turpin's obsession with Johanna, it's just that Anthony's intentions are probably more innocent. The movie downplays it a little (in contrast to the stage show).
@@walterwhite4862 I hadn't considered that until you mentioned it in all honesty as I haven't seen the stage show and am going strictly off of the movie interpretation. Either way, I missed that implication somehow but I really appreciate you providing that insight. Knowing that now, I can see what you mean about the story's intent. It almost seems kind of obvious now that I think about it so I feel a tad silly for not catching that lol XD
It's hard to notice if you aren't a music nerd, but there are a ton of musical cues that tell the story before it happens. That loud opening at the start which repeats after Sweeney says "my arm is complete" is the Dies Irae which in music represents death. It is also found in every character that dies and/or kills in the stage production (the movie differs a little bit). The theme for Sweeney's wife Lucy which plays during the flashback in the beginning also plays when Anthony meets Lucy as a beggar which if you have a keen eye you might figure out she is before the reveal at the end of the movie.
If you got a copy from Malaysia you would have been able to watch it :) In Malaysia it is rated 13. I saw this for the first time when I was 14......I didn't find it too bad in terms of goriness or graphicness and I quite enjoyed the music too :)
It would be interesting for you to review the Broadway pro shot of Into the Woods ( it's technically a movie ,right ? 😂😂😂 Also written by the same guy ... Stephen Sondheim ) The 2014 movie adaptation is not anyone's time it was garbage 🗑️ ... I know it's the pro shot of a stage show,but I'd like to hear your thoughts on it ( it's available for free on UA-cam )
no offense, but this video would be a lot better without all the really stupid jokes. did they even feel funny to you guys writing, recording, and then seeing them half a dozen times as you edited? i can't imagine they did. just review, no one is here for comedy
Everybody has different tastes, so it's fine if you don't like the jokes. But it's very hyperbolic of you to assume that NO ONE does. And if you really meant "no offense", maybe you should've phrased your comment differently because it feels like it's crafted to be insulting.
To be fair, Toby was nowhere near experienced in killing as Todd was, and based on the bloodflow he didn't cut that deep. Todd was probably alive for a while after his throat was cut, waiting to bleed out, so he could still hold Lucy. Creepy as that is.
you can see that his left knee is at least partially under her back, so even if he's fully dead there is at least a partially explanation
Hououin Kyouma True
If what you're saying is true, then that counts as Fridge Horror.
Askmolnet Ah, I see you're a person of culture as well
My theory is that Mrs. Lovett is the one who poisoned Lucy. How else would Lovett know exactly what happened to Lucy. It also explains why The Begger Woman(Lucy) is suspicious of Mrs. Lovett and calls her a witch/the Devils wife.
Mrs. Lovett said that Lucy got the poison from an apothecary and tried to stop her. But then again she also could have been lying.
Well, the beggar is actually Lucy
I thought I was the only one who had this theory
While I know they establish it differently in the film, I much prefer your theory.
Yeahm, i had this theory too. It makes perfect sense, and the motifs line up
I find it funny how most of the main cast ended up being Harry Potter villains.
also it's funny that the young and the old grindelwald are friends in this movie. we just need ezra, dolores and greyback's actor to make the list full.
Elizabeth Clover true that.
If only Sachs Baron Cohen was in a Harry Potter.
It definetly beats my fanfiction
Lucy *could* have told Lovett what happened to her after she returned home from seeing the judge. She would have been distraught and might have related it to her landlady (Lovett) in a moment of dispair. Many rape victims do tell someone they trust because it's too heavy a burden to keep to themselves. But because Victorian mores would have caused Lovett to tell Lucy to keep it to herself from now on and never admit to anyone that it happened, I can see how it would have eventually eaten away at Lucy. With no husband to support her and a child to raise, facing poverty and possibly losing her home, having no friends or family she could turn to for help, Lucy breaks down and poisons herself rather than go on living.
There is nothing to suggest she poisoned herself immediately after the judge's attack right there in his own house. She was incapacitated and probably unable to do anything immediately
This is actually a happy ending if you think about it. The three innocent characters (besides Lucy) lived. Toby Anthony and Johanna all live while all the characters (again. Besides Lucy) who’ve done wrong get the death they deserve
Nobody ever seems to mention the massive plot hole behind the trapdoor chair. It apparently leads straight down into the basement/cellar portion of the building yet no, the barber chair's location is right above the indoor dining area of Mrs. Lovett cafe. It literally cannot work.
Metorajetta They built a slide. It's a joke, but it is funny to think about,
The purse isn't a plot hole. When Mrs. Lovett took it off the dead body they weren't planning to keep Toby around indefinitely, they were just going to get him drunk and then presumably send him on his way (he wasn't there when they were planning how to dispose of the dead bodies). Afterward, he came to work for her, but that was when well after they had the trap door installed and had been able to expand the business to include not only indoor but outdoor seating, which doesn't happen overnight. It was likely 2-3 months between when they started their cannibalism business until Toby was there regularly because they were comfortable enough that Mrs. Lovett was thinking of using the money they were making to take a trip. It's not only possible but completely plausible that with the passage of time she forgot that, oh yeah, this purse came from Toby's former boss, obviously he would recognize it and she should get rid of it.
These are fair points to make.
Honestly, this is the darkest, most morbid and gothic musical probably the world will ever see
*And I love it*
I thought Johnny Depp was a pretty good singer in this movie. Same with Sacha Baron Cohen.
3:33 Don’t disrespect Helena like that, she’s an awesome actor and she deserved that part in the movie
I’m supprised you never mentioned the fact that in this version we never learn what happens to Joanna and Anthony
Or how technically sweeny is killing people in front of a massive window
Or how nobody else figured out the people into pies thing since Toby picked a freaking thumb of of the pie he ate
I watched this movie at 11 with no parent present just me and my girlfriend (at the time) hanging out in her stepmoms basement watching an r rated movie... fun times
I watched this when I was 11 with my mum lol
Sweeney todd is pretty tame though they preform it at high schools
There was a reason why Johnny couldn't sing it was because his daughter was sick in the hospital for two weeks so they didn't have time to do the ballad. They planned to even have Christopher Lee to be in it. It was supposed to be a graveyard with the spirits of Sweeney's victims sinning together. It was meant to be the opening.
Projectboy and that’s why Anthony Head was in that one scene
That sounds so lit
I think they changed the opening, because the graveyard scene would have been very similar to the opening number of Elisabeth, a musical that never made it to Broadway or Westend, but is popular enough in mainland Europe and Japan that copying it (whether intentionally or coincidentally) would have been a bad look for the Sweeney Todd movie.
That poor kid is now scared for eternity
My 9yo sister just watched this today and said it’s 9/10....but how many shirts and sheets does he have? He soaks them all in blood.
I wish that Alan Rickman had sung the song Mea Culpa. The judge contemplates the sinfulness of his lust for Joanna.
Love this movie mainly because of Helena but the best scene has to be nothing’s gonna harm you it’s just so sweet
I like the movie, althought it wasn't perfect. I like how they showed some traits of the characters just with pictures and some of their gestures. Like the judge, who we learn is a disturbing perverted man through lovett's song but also through the decorations in his room and his habbit of spying on joanna. Still, some of sweeney's actions weren't exactly smart. He could have gotten his revenge and his daughter had he only been smarter and faster in his actions. He had the judge on silver plate but instead of killing him when turpin had let his guard down, todd starts shaving him and wasting time singing. He could have handled the situation with pirelli much calmer too, but he panicked and acted stupidly by killing him in such a messy way while pirelli's servant boy was downstairs and could have heard everything. Another thing I have an issue with is lovett's harley quinish love for sweeney. she cared only for him, and didn't care about his family. she could have go with his wife that night she went to turpin's house, or perhaps warn her not to go, since she obviously knew what was up; after lucy poisoned herself and turpin took her kid, lovett did nothing to stop him, instead of hidding the baby she hid sweeney's silver razors, yet later in the film she acts so motherly to all kids she see and even hints that she wouldn't mind becoming joana's stepmother to care for her. seems fishy.
Regardless of its issues, I still love the musical numbers and the movie as a whole. And I thing Helena did a great job as mrs lovett.
Well that's the point of Mrs. Lovett. She let Barker's family be taken in hopes that one day he would come back and spend his life with her. That's why she kept the razors. It wasn't a smart plan obviously though because he ended up just becoming obsessed with revenge.
one thing they did with the music that i didn’t like is when sweeney todd kills lucy. the loud dramatic music was appropriate if the audience already knew it was lucy. but since the audience doesn’t find out its lucy until the last 5 minutes of the movie, the background music is like a spoiler. when i first watched the movie i was like “wait whats with the music? the begger woman wasnt a really important character. its no different from killing perelli or anything”
If you listened closely to the music, it revealed the beggar was the wife as soon as she appeared in the film. The background music that plays when the beggar appears is only used at one other place in the movie: at the masquerade party. It’s really interesting how much is straight up spoiled by the songs. Look up Sideways’ Sweeny Todd musical analysis. He explains a lot of this.
25:00 the attendants did, rumors spread
26:34 my 2 brain cells at work
I love this film, but I've always had one gripe with the obsession Antony shows with Joanna. While I recognize that it's Joanna's way out more so than a star-crossed love affair for her, but good god Romeo would tell Antony to slow down and ease up!
That's how I first viewed his feelings for Joanna, and that's bad enough, but when you really think about it, the whole romance plot (for Antony's part at least) isn't even that deep. Romeo and Juliet is about two people who basically risk it all and pay the price for puppy love, but at least they met and spoke face-to-face before they jumped into romance, and even Juliet makes good points that show she wasn't entirely on board from the get-go entirely.
Juliet was the more mature of the pair, and so too is Joanna, albeit for different reasons, but they are both still naïve. More to the point, this kind of shows that in the end, the fundamental problem comes back around to a key word I used earlier: Obsession.
Antony is a young man, likely barely into his early twenties at oldest, and while he has traveled the world to an extent given his occupation as a sailor, he is not exactly a worldly man, nor is he experienced with romance or interacting with women, especially since his occupation was a strictly all-male profession in that time period.
I may digress a touch, but I think it still remains germane to my overall point. He sees a pretty girl and his mind immediately conjures fantasies of whisking Joanna away to somewhere safe and distant where they can be together for the rest of their days. He is clearly an emotionally immature romantic idealist, but his behaviors strike me as more obsessed with Joanna, especially considering she may not actually feel the same way for him, but recognizes the opportunity to escape the malevolence that otherwise surrounds her.
While I wouldn't say that Antony's intent or the way he views Joanna is meant to be predatory, but it certainly comes across that way from any perspective I can imagine outside of Antony's mindset. His feelings and deeds are on an even more base level than those of Romeo's, and he is just as immature, if not more so.
Romeo's feelings were at least driven by an established habit of his in regards to falling in love and often getting his heart broken because of the emotionally precarious positions he puts himself in even prior to his meeting Juliet, so his attraction to Juliet is shown to be his pattern.
Prior to his attraction to Antony, we have no real sense of who he is as a person beyond being young and also that he is suddenly in love because, "Girl pretty." To a degree this is true of Romeo as well, but that's my point. In the end Romeo and Juliet provides a great example as to what kind of attraction shouldn't be gambled on when one's entire life is the asking price.
With Antony and Joanna, it's far more complicated than that for her, and even less understandable for his part given he has spent precisely zero amount of time with her and getting to know her. Say what you will for Romeo and Juliet, at least they had spoken to one another before they both decided to go headlong into their developing relationship.
I could continue with this and give detailed points about how Romeo is also more complex in regards to his quickness to anger and even outright murder by way of dueling, and having done so in revenge for the death of someone close to him, showing that he isn't just some ideal cute boy from next door type and even shows Juliet is conflicted in just how to view her new lover as a person, and not just a man. However, if I did so beyond this point my little diatribe here would be a full-length novel lol
While she is ultimately undeterred, she does take a brief moment's pause nonetheless. Antony shows an obsession that is likely one-sided as all get-out and his actions only show how far that obsession goes, but don't indicate anything else beyond that point. He is a character defined and driven by his attraction alone, but shows no other tell-tale traits that don't revolve around this, or at least not enough of them to give us a sense of who he is beyond that.
He is young and depending on how you look at it, not truly in love. He is obsessed, and Joanna is desperate to be free of her captor. It's really on the whole not much deeper than that. Obsession isn't the same thing as love or even a crush. Love or a crush isn't always reciprocated and at least for one person usually means knowing who their love/crush is beyond more than someone they see in a window for five seconds.
Beyond, "girl pretty," what is there really to love about Joanna? She doesn't really show much in the way of character traits considering she isn't really given any chance to. In a way, one could argue that she is treated as little more than a prize to be fought for as opposed to a developed character in her own right.
Basically, this lack of development and Antony's obsession serve as a big old red flag and as a how-not-to in regards to infatuation and obsession just as much as Romeo and Juliet is for puppy love between two young and immature individuals. Both tales serve as a warning sign for their respective viewpoints, but they in and of themselves aren't warnings of the same thing as they may seem at first glance on the surface.
I agree with all your points. I also hate it when he says he’ll “steal her” away... why not “rescue”? Is it he is objectifying her as well? (Albeit on another perhaps more innocent level). Poor thing indeed, her and Toby are the two with the truly sad storylines. All the adults around them acting a fool. (Like Joanna’s mom for instance.... why would you attempt suicide with a little baby that needs you?)
I agree with you, but this ain't a gripe, it's just a good analysis. This is all intentional.
@@walterwhite4862 I guess they were going for a Romeo-esque outlook for the character in the sense that he has an immature understanding of what love is as opposed to infatuation. If that's the case, I can understand that and let some of it slide, but I think for me it's just a bit much and creeps me out a bit either way. I'm probably overanalyzing it anyway lol
@@loneronin6813 It is purposefully a bit creepy. His instantaneous obsession with Johanna is meant to mirror Turpin's obsession with Johanna, it's just that Anthony's intentions are probably more innocent. The movie downplays it a little (in contrast to the stage show).
@@walterwhite4862 I hadn't considered that until you mentioned it in all honesty as I haven't seen the stage show and am going strictly off of the movie interpretation. Either way, I missed that implication somehow but I really appreciate you providing that insight. Knowing that now, I can see what you mean about the story's intent. It almost seems kind of obvious now that I think about it so I feel a tad silly for not catching that lol XD
I love this video so much. You’re underrated like Nerd City
Never let it be said your cases ever get boring
1:49 i was about 10 when it came out and i watched it in the movie theater. had to bring my mom along though
It's hard to notice if you aren't a music nerd, but there are a ton of musical cues that tell the story before it happens. That loud opening at the start which repeats after Sweeney says "my arm is complete" is the Dies Irae which in music represents death. It is also found in every character that dies and/or kills in the stage production (the movie differs a little bit). The theme for Sweeney's wife Lucy which plays during the flashback in the beginning also plays when Anthony meets Lucy as a beggar which if you have a keen eye you might figure out she is before the reveal at the end of the movie.
Great Review Man!
To be honest, the kid who plays Toby is the best singer in the whole movie in my opinion.
Still makes me laugh that four actors in this movie were in the Harry Potter movies 🤣.
24:22 omg i love you
i just cant get the dathings1 ytp out of my head
Rofl Toby don’t have thumbs to protect his new moma
If you got a copy from Malaysia you would have been able to watch it :) In Malaysia it is rated 13. I saw this for the first time when I was 14......I didn't find it too bad in terms of goriness or graphicness and I quite enjoyed the music too :)
The original musical is 13+ In the usa
Greetings from Poland 🖖😎
That was cool as hell 🙃😁😎
My sister likes this movie
It would be interesting for you to review the Broadway pro shot of Into the Woods ( it's technically a movie ,right ? 😂😂😂 Also written by the same guy ... Stephen Sondheim ) The 2014 movie adaptation is not anyone's time it was garbage 🗑️ ... I know it's the pro shot of a stage show,but I'd like to hear your thoughts on it ( it's available for free on UA-cam )
nice
no offense, but this video would be a lot better without all the really stupid jokes. did they even feel funny to you guys writing, recording, and then seeing them half a dozen times as you edited? i can't imagine they did. just review, no one is here for comedy
Everybody has different tastes, so it's fine if you don't like the jokes. But it's very hyperbolic of you to assume that NO ONE does.
And if you really meant "no offense", maybe you should've phrased your comment differently because it feels like it's crafted to be insulting.
Jesus, girl, relax. They were funny, I laughed. Go watch something else, it’s that simple.
I mean this is the typical humor you find in a movie review on UA-cam, calm down