Courses I took in my Theoretical Physics Degree! Deep Dive.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @Adedayodeji
    @Adedayodeji 11 місяців тому +3

    Hi Afik. I love your content! Please make the video about the textbooks you used. Thanks!

  • @StianOke
    @StianOke 11 місяців тому +12

    Having my first quantum physics course next semester in my bachelor, and hoping to take my masters in theoretical particle physics after, so thank you for reminding me of all the fun stuff involved in QFT! Motivation back up into my linear algebra 2 and E&M exams im having next week 🫡

  • @quentin3331
    @quentin3331 11 місяців тому +8

    I love your videos even though I'm a PhD student in tropical botany and will never be confronted with this type of research ahah ! Please keep going :)

    • @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42
      @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42  11 місяців тому +1

      Thank you so much for your kind words Quentin! Let me know if you’d like to see any specific content

  • @adlanmfaras5780
    @adlanmfaras5780 11 місяців тому +1

    Can't wait for the textbooks video!!

  • @isobaric
    @isobaric 11 місяців тому +1

    Bloody loved this video, bravo !

  • @THESUPERIORONE.
    @THESUPERIORONE. 11 місяців тому

    Great video Afiq

  • @lifej352
    @lifej352 11 місяців тому

    Thank you for the video.

  • @MikeFuller-ok6ok
    @MikeFuller-ok6ok 9 місяців тому

    I could never do a degree, let alone a physics degree. Lol! I don't even understand how levers work. However I am very pleased that there are people who are clever enough to do these studies. There is something very admirable about a decent person doing something good with their life.

  • @wowfmomf6126
    @wowfmomf6126 11 місяців тому +14

    Please do not ignore me.
    I want your opinion, i like the topic of physics and i want to study it. Problem is i do not want to have to physically attend university but i am ready to self study and study online , i am hoping to do a master's degree in CS online from Georgia Tech (OMSCS) and after that combine what i will learn from thst masters with my self study of physics and math(MIT online lectures and other sources) to peruse a career in computational physics. The end goal is to be able to publish research and papers in respectable physics journals.

    • @reyco-hp4uf
      @reyco-hp4uf 11 місяців тому +5

      This is a ridiculous ask! Nonetheless there exists resources such as Gerard T Hooft How to be a Good Physicist, and Reddit has good listmanias. Once again, reaching say QM, QFT/ST is possible in self study, original research on the other hand….

    • @wowfmomf6126
      @wowfmomf6126 11 місяців тому +1

      @@reyco-hp4uf no when it comes to original research i am ikay with enrolling in a PHD program in a university so i work with others who are doing research in computational physics.
      Btw how is this a ridiculous ask?

    • @reyco-hp4uf
      @reyco-hp4uf 11 місяців тому +4

      @@wowfmomf6126Doing original research in a non academic setting is almost impossible; thus, it being a hard ask😊 but seems like you plan on staying in academia so it should be OK

    • @wowfmomf6126
      @wowfmomf6126 11 місяців тому +1

      @@reyco-hp4uf thanks for clarifying as i explained i plan on doing my masters in CS from Georgia tech and then try to enroll in a PHD program in computational physics. So you think this is a possible way to make a career as a physicist

    • @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42
      @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42  11 місяців тому +2

      Hey there sorry for the late reply, I was pondering this and your situation. - I think you can definitely self learn physics, and I will do a video on this very soon. I think you can self learn anything in theory. But the question then is - will self learning be enough to actually get you to publish? Unfortunately, the academic system is crap and still relies a lot on credentials to get you in the door so that people want to work with you. This is a bit of a philosophical question too - I have published a book before and honestly it really depends on why you want to publish, and the motivations. Plenty of interesting my physics is to be done outside of acedemia and personally this is where I think the real value of physics lies.

  • @oskarschindler4356
    @oskarschindler4356 11 місяців тому +2

    I find it pretty interesting that yout took all these physics courses and still decided to jump into finance. my question now is, how much of physics and that math that you've learned is actually used in your jobs? I'm currently an undergrad in physics at ETH-Zurich and its pretty common that banks and quantative trading companies try to recrute math- and physics students, but I dont see the jump from theoritecal physics to finance.

    • @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42
      @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42  11 місяців тому +2

      It’s true, there’s not a lot of overlap content wise at all! I like both, and i am still actively trying to get the best of both worlds.

    • @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42
      @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42  11 місяців тому +2

      That being said, the core thinking skills, coding, and math skills are transferable.

    • @oskarschindler4356
      @oskarschindler4356 11 місяців тому +1

      @@CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42 i see, thanks for your answer and your valuable output. have a nice day!

  • @fernandovazquez4830
    @fernandovazquez4830 7 місяців тому

    Hi, Afiq! Thanks for making this video :) I just got accepted into the MASt in Theoretical Physics at Cambridge 🥳I would love to have your opinion on how students treat each other since I've heard that this programme is so competitive that it becomes toxic between other students. Is this true or are students supportive? How was your experience dealing with the workload?

  • @anguscheung8495
    @anguscheung8495 11 місяців тому +3

    Hey, just wondering if you have any advice for a maths interview at Cambridge because I’ve got both of mine on Monday 😭😭

    • @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42
      @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42  11 місяців тому +5

      yo - best thing you can do is to think out loud, relax, and explain your reasoning in words, step by step. you'll be fine. good luck!

    • @anguscheung8495
      @anguscheung8495 11 місяців тому

      Thanks for the advice and for the helpful and insightful videos as always :D @@CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42

  • @diegoalejandrosanchezherre4788
    @diegoalejandrosanchezherre4788 11 місяців тому +1

    All wonderfull!!!

    • @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42
      @CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42  11 місяців тому

      Indeed!! Any topics you’d like me to deep dive into?

    • @diegoalejandrosanchezherre4788
      @diegoalejandrosanchezherre4788 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@CasualPhysicsEnjoyer42i wonder about black holes, recently one question arrive to me about them:
      Theortically, in a maximal spinning kerr black hole, the ring like singularity spin faster than the speed of ligth???

  • @alazar369
    @alazar369 11 місяців тому +1

    do you have a recommendation on books, lecture and roadmap specifically for self-learners

  • @Jon.B.geez.
    @Jon.B.geez. 11 місяців тому +1

    I am curious about the difficulties. Was it abstract mathematics that made it difficult or were the physical models hard to understand? I have a math background so things like topology and geometry are understandable to me, but I sometimes fear the concepts in physics will get so hard that my math knowledge is useless if I pursued a Physics PhD. I audited QM this semester and I found all of that stuff conceptually accessible. Not sure how hard it really gets.

  • @一般男性-i5q
    @一般男性-i5q 11 місяців тому

    Can you share the content of quantitative trading? Thanks

  • @arthurmarazza6554
    @arthurmarazza6554 11 місяців тому +2

    Hello,
    I would like to ask a small question. Is it possible to take these courses by self-learning? Thank you!

  • @tillerbrady6624
    @tillerbrady6624 11 місяців тому +1

    What textbooks/lecture notes did you use for each course?

  • @real_pattern
    @real_pattern 11 місяців тому

    where do you fall on the line between realism and anti-realism about scientific theories after completing this course?

  • @NoDrizzy630
    @NoDrizzy630 11 місяців тому +2

    This may sound stupid but how could someone learn these things, not for a degree or anything but just out of curiosity?

    • @adlanmfaras5780
      @adlanmfaras5780 11 місяців тому +2

      Exactly what i want to ask also

    • @maidenlesstarnished8816
      @maidenlesstarnished8816 11 місяців тому

      Of course you can. You can learn anything on your own these days. Go tell chatgpt to figure out what level of math and physics you’re at and then have it design a curriculum for you that includes every topic and subtopic you’ll need to learn to get to the level you want. Ask for helpful free online resources, or payed if you’re willing to spend some money on the journey. You could learn this without chatgpt, but it’s an extremely powerful tool for self learning and if you’re seriously interested you’d do well to learn prompt engineering and how to make use of it. Follow the curriculum, if some of the material isn’t clicking for you, find something different. I’ve been learning all kinds of math, science, and especially computer science on my own for years. The only things that matter are consistency first and foremost, and following that is a good curriculum that starts at a point you’re capable of starting at and includes everything up until the point you’d like to get to. If you’re interested enough to ask that question, you’ve likely got what it takes to succeed in the learning. Just get started, and don’t stop, develop that intellectual confidence, learn to enjoy that feeling of being stuck on a hard problem, and again don’t stop. Btw huge universities frequently release lectures on UA-cam for free, and textbooks are also a great source to learning.

    • @benbrook469
      @benbrook469 11 місяців тому +1

      The best way is to get a degree from a good department. But if you want to self-study, you can follow textbooks and build up from foundations. Is there a particular course mentioned that you thought sounded interesting? Then I can tell you the path to study it

  • @Blake_47
    @Blake_47 7 місяців тому

    Can you make a video how you got accepted and what can I as a 1st year physics undergrad do to get accepted at institutions like Cambridge or Oxford to better prepare for masters in these colleges

  • @ActionReplay91
    @ActionReplay91 11 місяців тому

    You missed the most important topic i.e understanding gravity at quantum scale aka quantum gravity.

  • @AmakasuGeto-dp8bz
    @AmakasuGeto-dp8bz 11 місяців тому

    How hard is kinematics?

  • @cunningham.s_law
    @cunningham.s_law 11 місяців тому

    How hard is it to get into maths part3
    is it worth it?
    All of the course you mentioned are given to students in the graduate program at my current uni.

  • @valevan14
    @valevan14 11 місяців тому

    is this like mostly high energy physics or still general?

  • @jayeshmodhwadia8164
    @jayeshmodhwadia8164 11 місяців тому

    Hi Afiq - would be super interested to know the range of student abilities at Cambridge maths - both part 3 and undergrad. I assume everyone is smart but what does it take to be at the top? And how it is possible that students at Cambridge maths end up getting 2:2 degrees for example - is this because a certain proportion of students have to get 3rd, 2:2 etc or is it because they may not have been Cambridge material in the first place and somehow managed to get in? Thank you.

    • @benbrook469
      @benbrook469 11 місяців тому +1

      Degree classifications in the U.K. aren't standardised nationally. I don't think they're largely based on performance relative to other students either (but that can cause exam results to change sometimes). Cambridge maths sees good students get 2:2s because it's just quite hard -- more than most other maths programmes in the U.K.

    • @jayeshmodhwadia8164
      @jayeshmodhwadia8164 11 місяців тому

      The material is the same or very similar at most russell group universities so I'm not convinced Cambridge maths is any harder.

    • @benbrook469
      @benbrook469 11 місяців тому +1

      @@jayeshmodhwadia8164 the phenomenon you mentioned is really strong evidence that it is. Obviously Oxford and perhaps Imperial and Warwick might be on par though
      Anyway, if you're interested, here are Cambridge past exam papers: www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/past-ia-ib-and-ii-examination-papers. Part I, Part IA, Part II = Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

    • @jayeshmodhwadia8164
      @jayeshmodhwadia8164 11 місяців тому

      @@benbrook469 not sure I follow. If the material is very similar at each Russell group (or any other uni) than it follows.thr Cambridge course (or oxford, Warwick etc) is no more difficult.
      Looking at exam papers is not in my view a proxy to assess difficulty as the exam questions need to be looked at in comparison to what was covered in problem sheets etc during class.
      If your observation is true average maths Cambridge students should go elsewhere to study as a lower classification degree can seriously harm job prospects and entry into graduate programmes etc.

  • @Grandunifiedcelery
    @Grandunifiedcelery 11 місяців тому

    *GUT?* 🤔

  • @yojihagiya8183
    @yojihagiya8183 11 місяців тому

    Hello Afiq. Don't you think that Einstein's GR is ridicurous? I think it is just a fantasy. For me, all the physics nowadays are hocus pocus.

  • @asnawizainal8412
    @asnawizainal8412 11 місяців тому +1

    Hi Afiq, Im currently doing physics in manchester, i want some advice from you to continue doing physics possibly oxbridge. Is there a way to contact you via email for example?