The Schrödinger Equation Explained in 60 Seconds

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 389

  • @dominik.w1226
    @dominik.w1226 3 роки тому +2483

    watching at x2 speed -> understanding Schrödinger's equation in 30 secs

    • @wibufisika9606
      @wibufisika9606 3 роки тому +53

      Download the video, speed it up, then you can understand it in faster than light!

    • @vitery100
      @vitery100 3 роки тому +24

      You live in 2090

    • @dillbourne
      @dillbourne 3 роки тому +33

      Physics professors HATE this ONE trick!

    • @mihapetek3418
      @mihapetek3418 3 роки тому +2

      Smert

    • @amanrawatskosmos4548
      @amanrawatskosmos4548 3 роки тому +10

      @@wibufisika9606 nope! Then it will take 2 minutes to only download 😂😉

  • @herp_derpingson
    @herp_derpingson 3 роки тому +1614

    Video title: Can I Explain the Schrödinger Equation in 60 Seconds?
    Me: No
    Me: * Watches video *
    Me:

    • @domainofscience
      @domainofscience  3 роки тому +181

      Haha brilliant. That's how I feel about most of quantum mechanics tbh.

    • @rodrigoappendino
      @rodrigoappendino 3 роки тому +156

      It's more like
      1/√2 |yes> + 1/√2 |no>

    • @chillphil967
      @chillphil967 3 роки тому +14

      wait would comments be fermions or bosons..?

    • @rodrigoappendino
      @rodrigoappendino 3 роки тому +15

      @@chillphil967 Bósons, because they don't have spin (spin 0).

    • @TeslaElonSpaceXFan
      @TeslaElonSpaceXFan 3 роки тому +7

      @@rodrigoappendino Ohh, and what about 100%? 1/√2 + 1/√2 != 1

  • @domainofscience
    @domainofscience  3 роки тому +630

    Hey this is just a bit of an experiment. Sometimes you just want a quick introduction to something rather than diving into a full 20 min video. And it was a fun challenge to see if I could explain it in a minute. I'm still working on longer videos but might make more of these. What do you think?

    • @katelinhudak1947
      @katelinhudak1947 3 роки тому +40

      Yes, really enjoyed the quick video, would like to see more!

    • @karthikdulam9830
      @karthikdulam9830 3 роки тому +7

      Nice, that's this bit, that's that bit.

    • @YeeLeeHaw
      @YeeLeeHaw 3 роки тому +15

      These are great because it forces the teacher to remove unnecessary bloat and can focus on the fundamentals instead.

    • @madeofcake6972
      @madeofcake6972 3 роки тому +8

      Obviously this video was just for fun, but it would be good to see a more in depth video on it! Cheers.

    • @fernweh3726
      @fernweh3726 3 роки тому +7

      Certainly I do not appreciate this format, to me it seems useless

  • @somerandomguy___
    @somerandomguy___ 3 роки тому +695

    Alternative title : explaining the schrödinger equation speedrun any%

  • @edibesare
    @edibesare 3 роки тому +259

    That was really brilliant for a minute.

  • @waficlabban8658
    @waficlabban8658 3 роки тому +118

    You had me in the first minute not gonna lie

  • @moffboffjoe
    @moffboffjoe 3 роки тому +104

    I forgot that this was only 60s, the end caught me completely off guard

  • @emanoelanselmo180
    @emanoelanselmo180 3 роки тому +100

    "Can I Explain the Schrödinger Equation in 60 Seconds?": yes
    Can I understand the Schrödinger Equation in 60 Seconds?: no, but i like the speedrun.

    • @samblock4937
      @samblock4937 3 роки тому

      It’s not that complicated

    • @gerardo49078
      @gerardo49078 3 роки тому +14

      @@samblock4937 Whoa, easy there, Tesla

    • @golden1975
      @golden1975 3 роки тому +1

      @@gerardo49078 it really isn't

    • @redtoxic8701
      @redtoxic8701 3 роки тому +9

      @@golden1975 to understand what he explained not, but I still don't know what more than half of the symbols mean

    • @mikuculus3720
      @mikuculus3720 3 роки тому

      @@redtoxic8701 you need a background in math it’s mostly partial derivatives

  • @englebertmagentaschweiger1447
    @englebertmagentaschweiger1447 3 роки тому +9

    This is the best brief explanation of the Schrödinger equation I've ever seen. Well done.

  • @LookingGlassUniverse
    @LookingGlassUniverse 3 роки тому +62

    Nailed it! 😍

  • @davidhd7816
    @davidhd7816 3 роки тому +33

    If you keep going like this, you,ll make every each one of us a quantum physicist.

  • @wmelstan
    @wmelstan 3 роки тому +16

    It would be really interesting to watch about laser cooling and why it is not using in our regular life as an opposite of infrared heaters, to cool the surface of our bodies and furniture without cooling an air inside the room.

  • @GediMini
    @GediMini 3 роки тому +1

    Didn't even see the title before clicking on the video. Was shocked when it just ended abruptly. But great video! It can't be easy to explain a concept so well in is so few words

  • @Exler_Ko
    @Exler_Ko Рік тому +2

    i was actually hoping for the explanation to the equation

  • @TotalImmort7l
    @TotalImmort7l 3 роки тому +4

    Thank you very much for this Top tier content.

  • @petaflop.
    @petaflop. 3 роки тому +2

    The first minute of the video was really crazy!

  • @ankanart03
    @ankanart03 3 роки тому +88

    Physicist : Quantum Physics is very complicated
    DOS : Hold my 1m video 😄😄😄

    • @S20171
      @S20171 7 місяців тому +1

      This is chemistry

    • @mathskafunda4383
      @mathskafunda4383 6 місяців тому

      @@S20171 And Physics.

  • @rv706
    @rv706 3 роки тому +4

    Rather than "energy stays the same in time", I would say: "energy is what generates the dynamics", which is quite literally true from the math.

  • @lazarusunkwon6
    @lazarusunkwon6 3 роки тому +5

    So basically it's a partial differential equation adapted to the realm of discrete mathematics? I thought it would turn out to be more difficult, but if I were to compare it to other theories in the fields of science, like Das Kapital from economics, phylosophy and a bit of calculus; it turns out to be quiet easy. Just use your imagination and that's all. Thanks a lot to this man I can see that vague idea a lot clearer now, but at the same time it shows the long way I still need to develop it. Once more thank you very much DoS.

  • @yoshikojanededel4306
    @yoshikojanededel4306 3 роки тому +12

    Never clicked on something so fast

  • @david_porthouse
    @david_porthouse 3 роки тому +1

    The Schroedinger equation is ambiguously a wave equation and an equation of tachyonic Brownian motion. There's more than one way to travel faster than light, and these two behaviours are orthogonal to each other. Interesting things happen when our entity interacts with an electromagnetic field.

  • @tiong2351
    @tiong2351 3 роки тому +62

    Minute physics Xd

    • @mobizoid2571
      @mobizoid2571 3 роки тому

      😅😅😂😂👍

    • @adamxue6096
      @adamxue6096 3 роки тому +1

      Actually, why *_ISN'T_* this on Monute Physics instead XD

  • @romanbykov5922
    @romanbykov5922 3 роки тому +15

    Easy!
    Neo: I know Quantum Physics.
    Morpheus: Show me.

  • @JohnVKaravitis
    @JohnVKaravitis 3 роки тому +6

    0:12 Whether you treat it as a particle or a wave depends on what you are studying. Electrons do have particle behavior, but they also have wave behavior. FYI, I am wrapping up my BS - Physics, and have taken two Quantum Mechanics classes.

    • @seanki98
      @seanki98 3 роки тому +2

      you have to sweep a hell of a lot under the carpet to make a minute video on quantum physics

  • @luc7478
    @luc7478 3 роки тому +1

    It hits exactly the spot.

  • @rivv6796
    @rivv6796 3 роки тому +3

    Alternative title : Can you understand Schrodinger's equation in 60 secs?

  • @woufff_
    @woufff_ 3 роки тому +4

    Brilliant, reminds me of minutephysics, feel free to be flexible with the timing too :)

  • @scienceentanglement2180
    @scienceentanglement2180 3 роки тому +2

    Can I understand the Schrodinger equation in 60 seconds?
    yes yes yes yes yes
    yes yes yes yes yes
    ye s yes yes yes yes
    yes yes yes yes yes

  • @ad.i
    @ad.i 3 роки тому

    Man this is REALLY COOL. Well done :D

  • @SerumCRM114
    @SerumCRM114 3 роки тому +29

    I learned more from you in one minute than a whole semester of quantum chemistry 😂

  • @alexbailey791
    @alexbailey791 3 роки тому +1

    I think this was very successful and helpful

  • @kumailaziz146
    @kumailaziz146 3 роки тому +1

    Very Clear and GREAT!!!
    Go ahead and make more videos at the same way

  • @deepakvpd9535
    @deepakvpd9535 3 роки тому

    We want more of these shorts please❤️

  • @throwaway7425
    @throwaway7425 Рік тому +1

    actually more useful than my textbook, thank you

    • @VarunSaiHere
      @VarunSaiHere Рік тому

      your textbook must be your username tho🤣

  • @TheQuackingGuy
    @TheQuackingGuy 3 роки тому +8

    This feels very wrong. Trying to act like partial derivative with respect to time means "over time" and Hamiltonian acting on ψ meaning "Energy stays the same" can't be true. What you're describing is "total derivative of Hamiltonian is zero". Is that where schrodinger comes from?

    • @shoaibakhtar4389
      @shoaibakhtar4389 3 роки тому

      Can you explain me in detail?

    • @markho4958
      @markho4958 3 роки тому +3

      As a PhD student in Physics, this video is so wrong. Schrodinger Equation does NOT mean "energy stays the same".
      The correct way to interpret the Schrodinger Equation is: "Energy (or Hamiltonian) is the generator of time evolution of a wavefunction".
      To understand this sentence more easily, one can try to understand another similar statement "Momentum is the generator of space evolution(or translation)" , which is essentially saying "because an object have momentum, it translates( or it moves)"

    • @shoaibakhtar4389
      @shoaibakhtar4389 3 роки тому

      @@markho4958 Thanks for explanation bro

  • @jackshih6084
    @jackshih6084 3 роки тому

    To those don't know wave equation, it is Asin(kx-wt) for a periodic wave(including EM wave)

  • @spaghettimeatballs6352
    @spaghettimeatballs6352 3 роки тому +1

    You should do a map of Earth Science, because Earth Science is one of the 4 main sciences, and is the only one of the 4 mains missing (includes geology, meteorology, oceanology, etc.)

  • @sinecurve9999
    @sinecurve9999 3 роки тому +1

    How my quantum mechanics professor described the Schrodinger Equation: it's like the diffusion equation, but time is complex.

    • @DrAtomics
      @DrAtomics 3 роки тому

      Lol, he is over complicating things... That sucks to get those kinds of professors

  • @iliketrains0pwned
    @iliketrains0pwned 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much, my assignment is due TONIGHT!

  • @imjustpassinthru
    @imjustpassinthru 2 роки тому +1

    I'm not exactly new to this subject. I'm a working class guy with a good basic understanding of quantum mechanics because that sort of thing interests me. I get really frustrated with scientific language -- i.e., the "narrative" part of a theory in between the math equations -- because it's often vaguely written and subjective. Searching the internet for a basic definition of the Schrodinger equation, I keep reading that the equation deals with the evolving state of a "dynamic system." That's what I wanna know about. What all is included in the meaning of a "dynamic system?" The word "system" sounds like more than just one particle. Is the Schrodinger equation applicable to an atom? A molecule? A cluster of molecules? How about just a single electron or photon?

  • @mayurvalvi13
    @mayurvalvi13 3 роки тому

    I would love to see more vids like this ! This is a quick revision and very helpful 🤝👏👏👏👏👏

  • @sabrinae.6361
    @sabrinae.6361 3 роки тому

    This video was incredibly helpful, thank you.

  • @englishinenglish3473
    @englishinenglish3473 3 роки тому

    It’s amazing, even after 2 month working with it , have found new for a minute )

  • @rock3tcatU233
    @rock3tcatU233 Рік тому

    This was an awesome explanation!

  • @yungifez
    @yungifez 3 роки тому +2

    I'm getting cringed up
    I learn something in class today and a youtuber posts it
    This is the third time this week

  • @strangeranjan
    @strangeranjan 3 роки тому +2

    Schrödinger : you doesn't spell my name correctly, how can you derive equation

  • @himstitute9030
    @himstitute9030 3 роки тому +1

    please start a map series for classs 11th and 12th for every chapter

  • @billoddy5637
    @billoddy5637 2 роки тому

    Dude, this equation is mad wavey!

  • @kennethbrack4061
    @kennethbrack4061 10 місяців тому

    Thank you ! I knew the Schrodinger equation had to do with wave functions and it was important and comprehensive but that is all I knew. So it is basically a conservation of energy equation ! Ah. So simple.

  • @aadityapratap007
    @aadityapratap007 6 місяців тому

    That's exactly how I'll describe it next time to someone who dont know about it. Thanks.

  • @kassakal4530
    @kassakal4530 3 роки тому

    you are PERFECTO
    One question. Wave function we are talking about is the representation of wave shape, right? (a simple example: Amplitude=sin(t))

  • @siddharthpatil3099
    @siddharthpatil3099 3 роки тому +1

    Is Schrödinger's equation applicable to all the particles present in different dimensions of the universe,like if there is a particle moving in 5th dimension. And if I want to prove that dark matter consist of gravitons,will this eq help to prove it

  • @DrAtomics
    @DrAtomics 3 роки тому +1

    Currently taking quantum class, this was well timed lol.

  • @thecoolpanther3103
    @thecoolpanther3103 3 роки тому

    Great! Your channel is very cool!

  • @RobertHildebrandt
    @RobertHildebrandt 3 роки тому +1

    Love this!

  • @jaari2032
    @jaari2032 3 роки тому +58

    Nobody:
    The smart guy in the movie over complicating a simple thing with science stuff which don’t make sense

    • @tomimated1638
      @tomimated1638 3 роки тому +2

      I mean, it’s pretty well justified in its complexity, he explained a basic proxy for understanding a single character (repeated in triplicate), but it would probably take either of us several hours at least to use it to calculate the potential electron locations for like a caesium atom or something.

    • @strangeranjan
      @strangeranjan 3 роки тому

      But the main problem is detecting the neutrinos at the particle accelerator of our laboratory which can make annihilation of antineutrinos present there

  • @macovv7320
    @macovv7320 3 роки тому

    It was excellent, eventhough I don't know what wave functions, that made some sense Because I know what kinetic and potential energies are

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 6 місяців тому

    Based on what this video says we have photon ∆E=hf electron interaction continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons as an uncertainty ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future comes into existence.

  • @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634
    @pelasgeuspelasgeus4634 7 місяців тому

    Can you tell us when and how was experimentally proven the validity of that equation?

  • @B05S
    @B05S 3 роки тому

    Thanks for clarifying

  • @BCdesu
    @BCdesu 3 роки тому +1

    The real minute physics

  • @ju1911
    @ju1911 3 роки тому

    Up next please:
    How to understand the Schrödinger equation in 60 seconds

  • @BluetonicUK28
    @BluetonicUK28 3 роки тому

    Amazing job

  • @dorottyachoma2430
    @dorottyachoma2430 3 роки тому

    I wish I saw this video before my physical chemistry exam. :D

  • @MrGotmymojoworkin
    @MrGotmymojoworkin 3 роки тому

    Fantastic . Thank you very much.

  • @parthmehta909
    @parthmehta909 3 роки тому

    Could you please make a video on special theory of relativity

  • @muhammadahmad4610
    @muhammadahmad4610 Рік тому

    which software use for making videos?

  • @coastsidescience
    @coastsidescience 3 роки тому

    Anyone know what program is used to make these vids? I'm a science teacher and would love to use something similar .. Great vid btw! Thanks :-)

  • @dosomething3
    @dosomething3 3 роки тому

    Really brilliant

  • @cccircuit8296
    @cccircuit8296 3 роки тому

    Good job!

  • @MrAndrewiphone1
    @MrAndrewiphone1 3 роки тому

    Now you should do "Can I Explain the Schrödinger Equation in 60 minutes"

  • @theonebuffdudeSHORTS
    @theonebuffdudeSHORTS 3 роки тому

    Well done

  • @volbla
    @volbla 3 роки тому +1

    Now explain how to find that wave function :)

  • @utsavbose424
    @utsavbose424 3 роки тому

    What software can be used to make such video and edits?

  • @rimasfaxi6165
    @rimasfaxi6165 3 роки тому

    Can you please explain the dirac equation??

  • @harshchaurasia5869
    @harshchaurasia5869 3 роки тому +1

    The uncertainty principle says that you can't simultaneously make people understand the SE as well as make the video short

  • @TheDogn
    @TheDogn 3 роки тому

    Saw the video and clicked it, duh. Then it was over in 60 seconds 😆 took me by surprise. But then I though about it and realized how genius it was. 🤔

  • @mynameisbryanok
    @mynameisbryanok 3 роки тому

    I know DoS stands for Domain of Science, but are you also making a reference to the density of states?

  • @mipsuperk
    @mipsuperk 3 роки тому +1

    Short video, but I still watched it at 2x speed. Ain't nobody got time for normal speed videos.

  • @alurma
    @alurma 3 роки тому

    hey! make more of those :)

  • @mynameisgleeriplaypiano4620
    @mynameisgleeriplaypiano4620 3 роки тому

    Can you explain about Multiverse with Many Worlds Theory?

  • @strwz
    @strwz 3 роки тому +1

    great, now make me understand the Schrodinger equation in 60 seconds

  • @Atlasik
    @Atlasik 3 роки тому +1

    when you have 1 minute left till your online meeting

  • @aaaaahhhhhh6969
    @aaaaahhhhhh6969 3 роки тому +1

    Resolution is trivial and left as an exercise for the reader

  • @KaranSingh-or7yy
    @KaranSingh-or7yy 3 роки тому

    Make more videos like this. Loved the concept

  • @craftbuzzwonky4752
    @craftbuzzwonky4752 3 роки тому

    Now please accept a challenge of explaining this in 45 hours!

  • @pegah9413
    @pegah9413 3 роки тому

    Yep, you nailed it! Now I have to go find another video that tells me what all those symbols are for. There is no end to curiosity B)

  • @mathadventuress
    @mathadventuress 2 роки тому

    That left me with more questions than answers lol

  • @yashgarg4864
    @yashgarg4864 3 роки тому

    Wow, That will help in my quiz tomorrow.....
    But seriously guys, wish me luck

  • @wassollderscheiss33
    @wassollderscheiss33 3 роки тому +2

    I need this explained in detail to a somewhat layman (engineer)

  • @muhammadhaikal1896
    @muhammadhaikal1896 3 роки тому +1

    Nice, Now I can register for Harvard

  • @charstringetje
    @charstringetje 3 роки тому

    That's proper Minute Physics

  • @1Reevee
    @1Reevee 3 роки тому

    once I learned what psi was the whole equation became much less scary

  • @lambda4931
    @lambda4931 3 роки тому +1

    Great

  • @kitesurfingspot
    @kitesurfingspot 3 роки тому

    That was fun!

  • @puneetmaheshwari
    @puneetmaheshwari 3 роки тому

    u did it congratulation

  • @dnhdfnfkrjxjxfjjggj3002
    @dnhdfnfkrjxjxfjjggj3002 3 роки тому

    In only 60 seconds, a minute passed here😳😳🤯

  • @rustam1776
    @rustam1776 2 роки тому

    can you teach the schrodinger equation...

  • @MichaelKasifMusic
    @MichaelKasifMusic 3 роки тому

    Explaining and understanding are two different things

  • @ezinwanneikediuwa1316
    @ezinwanneikediuwa1316 3 роки тому

    All I have learnt in Chemistry is because of this equation yet, I do not know the equation, I do not use it, I can't digest it, and it is a nightmare to most Chemists but all chemists know its interpretations better than anyone, teach it and understands the world we live in because of it.
    It is a paradoxical equation indeed.
    I need to wine with Schrodinger right now and laugh over it.