Proof: Law of sines | Trig identities and examples | Trigonometry | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 111

  • @Peter_1986
    @Peter_1986 10 років тому +135

    This is exactly how I think you are supposed to learn math - try to understand the exact reasonings behind things, so that you can derive them yourself on the spot.

    • @cedarsapling
      @cedarsapling 9 років тому +8

      Laurelindo This is a good way to learn simple math, but when you get into grade 12 (senior) year math and physics in highschool sometimes you get so many formulas and equations that it is much easier just to memorize them and what they are used for!

    • @Peter_1986
      @Peter_1986 9 років тому +16

      Yes, that's true - however, I think that one should always try to understand a formula as deeply as possible, as long as it isn't too time-consuming or complicated to derive.
      You could certainly get by with simply memorizing and using the formulas for calculating whatever an exam problem is asking for, but I think that formulas are always much more fun when I can sort of go through them in my head from beginning to end.
      I believe the first formula that I tried to derive myself was the Law Of Cosines, and when I succeeded I felt a great satisfaction, and I have been hooked since then, haha.

    • @Peter_1986
      @Peter_1986 9 років тому +6

      Irving Ceron Exactly.
      Formulas can be convenient if you want to quickly calculate something and you don't need to prove that you can derive those formulas, but it is a highly recommended practice to actually derive them from scratch every now and then.
      Personally I try to use as little formulas as possible - if you can derive something from the very basics then that's a good sign that you have a deep understanding for it.

    • @That_One_Guy...
      @That_One_Guy... 5 років тому +5

      I actually hate math until i try to understand the reasons behind formulas , memorizing sucks, that's why many people think math is hard and boring

    • @ShudiptoDip39
      @ShudiptoDip39 5 років тому +2

      Exactly my thought,bro! The sad part is, you don't have enough time to derive the formulas and do the math in the exam hall though.

  • @thbrightday
    @thbrightday 11 років тому +64

    In the beginning, there was the 4 mathematical functions: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. These 4 all lived in peace and harmony. But then, a great evil changed the mathematical world forever: X and Y. These letters attacked the peaceful world of the math functions, and the rest of the letter followed, leaving destruction and devastation in their wake.
    Only the Avatar, who mastered all 4 function could save us, but he disappeared.
    We most find a new Avatar to save our world!

  • @Taioz
    @Taioz 6 років тому +65

    "Hopefully that relationship will be the Law of Sines. Otherwise I would have to rename this video." LOL

  • @Paraselene_Tao
    @Paraselene_Tao 7 років тому +16

    As soon I saw the triangle being drawn by MS Paint-like lines, I knew this was an old video!
    2007? That's near the beginning of Khan Academy. I was still a Freshman in high school when this video was made... wow.

    • @AriseJura
      @AriseJura 9 місяців тому

      haha this video is older than me

    • @glerpglerpglerp
      @glerpglerpglerp 8 місяців тому

      I wasn't even a year old. now I'm 17

    • @opsalbit
      @opsalbit 2 місяці тому

      this video is days younger than me

  • @antoniobortoni
    @antoniobortoni 8 років тому +13

    I have been triying to find this explanation everywere... thanks.

  • @rosesarelike
    @rosesarelike 11 років тому +1

    I have been on a trigonometry marathon for the last three hours and my head hurts but the videos keep coming because of the playlist and essentially I can do nothing but watch.

  • @GearKing05
    @GearKing05 10 років тому +15

    Thanks Sal, you never fail me

  • @Moonlightkitteh101
    @Moonlightkitteh101 14 років тому +3

    Thank you so much: you have just saved my math grade!

    • @alexmisra6690
      @alexmisra6690 3 роки тому +3

      How's life 10 years later

    • @78anurag
      @78anurag 3 роки тому +2

      @@alexmisra6690 Probably graduated from college and has a job

  • @kamranshafi4163
    @kamranshafi4163 5 років тому +1

    I was confused when i saw this law in physics......but now i understood it completely.......thank u

  • @vivianyu5382
    @vivianyu5382 4 роки тому +4

    I still don't understand how to proof c over sinC equal to other

    • @GhostyOcean
      @GhostyOcean 5 місяців тому

      Does it matter which two sides of the triangle you pick? The method shown can be duplicated by dropping an altitude from β and get sin(α)/A = sin(c)/C. But we already showed sin(α)/A = sin(β)/B, so by the transitive property of equality all three ratios are equivalent.

  • @HectorL360
    @HectorL360 13 років тому +13

    Some Old Hippy Caught Another Hippy Trippin On Acid.

  • @mykeuser
    @mykeuser 17 років тому +1

    Excellent!
    I memorised this, its the same:
    sin(alpha)/sin(beta) = A/B

  • @ultimatepirate9589
    @ultimatepirate9589 8 років тому +32

    pewdiepie has 40 million subs
    khan has 3 million
    is it only me that thinks this is a little unfair?

  • @smackdashitoutchu7755
    @smackdashitoutchu7755 3 роки тому

    Absolutely fascinating. Nothing more on the planet that I love than seeing mathematical proofs.

  • @maizygrace
    @maizygrace 13 років тому

    Thank you - I'm in need of a trig brush up and your concise explanation is just right for me. I always need to understand the derivation of formulas in order to remember them. Your simple explanation is very helpful.

  • @danieloreto
    @danieloreto 16 років тому

    At 00:49, the triangle has just one angle without name, and this is going to be gamma. So when you draw the perpendicular line to B you will have the same situation than in the video, rather instead of B and alpha you'll have gamma and A. Good luck! (this post is the following part from the former)

  • @LostStarzOfTheSky
    @LostStarzOfTheSky 11 років тому +4

    I was taught Some Old Hobo (Sine Opposite/Hypotenuse) Caught Another Hobo (Cosine Adjacent/Hypo) Tripping on Acid (Tan Opposite/ Adjacent) SohCahToa sounds like I'm speaking a different language

    • @janetteruiz9347
      @janetteruiz9347 5 років тому +1

      Dudeee you saved me, i prounounce things a bit differently and tend to mix up sohcahtoa. Im definitely using this🖤

  • @lexinaut
    @lexinaut 14 років тому

    Nice job! The Law of Sines proof can take you to a higher trickynometric place. It's definitely NOT the height of absurdity although ALTITUDE is certainly involved. Thanks for a colorful and clear presentation. On a less goofy note, the relationship shown is an interesting one.

  • @spudcole319
    @spudcole319 15 років тому +1

    Just a question, i may not know much about trigonometry, but what's wrong with using two small right triangles to prove the law of sines? What was inconsistent?
    Also, how would you prove the law of sines? because i really do wanna learn about trigonometry and to see a different way of proving this would be really helpful.

  • @noone4649
    @noone4649 Рік тому

    Thanks a lot Sir. That's the best prove I found.

  • @gecaprathamesh6583
    @gecaprathamesh6583 6 місяців тому

    Quick and helpful! Thanks ☺️

  • @Phizon442
    @Phizon442 14 років тому

    he's bringing the equation down to the law of sines as seen, well everywhere you see the law of sines.

  • @ppardee
    @ppardee 15 років тому

    More accurately, the opposite and adjacent sides are always relative to the angle you are solving for (or with). The hypotenuse is the longest side of a right triangle.

  • @mephatboi
    @mephatboi 17 років тому +1

    i only wanted to see how u get the third part, sin C/c
    but that's the part u skipped!

  • @sccr2009
    @sccr2009 14 років тому

    @TheNevikProject You're right, I've noticed it doesnt work in all triangles, its just hard finding those, or finding a relationship in those where it doesnt work.

  • @beanstie
    @beanstie 14 років тому

    He's dividing both sides by A and B so sin(alpha) and A are together on one side of the equation and sin(beta) and B are together on the other side. A and alpha are like partners, B and beta are like partners. They belong together.

  • @TheLonelyLurker1995
    @TheLonelyLurker1995 14 років тому

    thanks for teaching i have many troubles in math especially in trigo.

  • @pf1038xx
    @pf1038xx Рік тому

    I noticed a slight error at 5:58. (It also in the transcript.) You say "B over the sine of B," instead of "B over the sine of beta."
    I also noted that you used theta (the 8th letter) for the third angle, instead of gamma (the 3rd letter).
    I am a college math professor, I really like Khan Academy and am encouraging my 11-year-old son to use it to advance his mathematical knowledge.

  • @MartianSpore
    @MartianSpore 14 років тому

    @KhroniclesOfNothing I forgot that if there is no need to prove something that there is no reason to know something. Some people actually enjoy math and are interested in these things. Other people, learn better when they can understand why things are.

  • @ClaraZn
    @ClaraZn 7 місяців тому +1

    16 years ago is crazy

  • @roseb2105
    @roseb2105 6 років тому

    just to clarify to proove c/sineC you draw a horizontal line across angle C and that would be h/a or or h/b?

  • @acerbic42
    @acerbic42 13 років тому

    Saw you on Colbert, congrats man.

  • @satisfiction
    @satisfiction 7 років тому +1

    4:02 good ole Transitive Property of Equality

  • @ppardee
    @ppardee 15 років тому

    Opposite and adjacent are always relative to theta. The 90 degree angle should always be opposite the hypotenuse (I believe)

  • @seandavidr
    @seandavidr 15 років тому

    Could you show how to use the law of sines to solve physics problems involving forces and vectors.

  • @jerfersonmatos28
    @jerfersonmatos28 6 років тому +2

    Can I figure out something in a non-right triangle that only gives me the area and the sum of the angles? I'm really wanting to know

    • @ribhuhooja3137
      @ribhuhooja3137 5 років тому

      Sum of angles is ALWAYS 180. As for area, you can use HERON'S FORMULA

  • @glendale011192
    @glendale011192 12 років тому

    oh men thanks for this video it helps me alote ^^

  • @dachu108
    @dachu108 15 років тому

    Thank you, I finally know how the equation came to be now :]

  • @juifu
    @juifu 13 років тому

    I need the proof of sine of beta over B equals to sine alpha over A equals sine theta over C "EQUALS TO 2R"? I saw that in some textbooks. thank you

  • @Saiixx
    @Saiixx 12 років тому

    hey can you show the other proof using area of triangle? thanks!

  • @m22d52
    @m22d52 4 роки тому

    interesting, would be great to see sinus law in different dimensions

  • @Thuase
    @Thuase Рік тому

    Wouldn't mind a remaster of this video its hard to read

  • @mochalucha
    @mochalucha 14 років тому

    ur a good man

  • @danieloreto
    @danieloreto 16 років тому

    Actually, transitivity is not a law, is an axiom, so it CANNOT be proved, its a statement which needs no demonstration, it is simply true. Answering mephatboi, the process for getting sine gamma over C (or sine C/c) is the same, but in this case you are going to draw a perpendicular line
    to B that passes through beta.

  • @sauravgupta9909
    @sauravgupta9909 6 років тому

    Thanks sir...

  • @SanjaySingh-zc3qi
    @SanjaySingh-zc3qi 12 років тому

    Great Video

  • @thebaconwarrior669
    @thebaconwarrior669 9 років тому

    thank you

  • @hoangnguyennguyen6445
    @hoangnguyennguyen6445 3 роки тому

    this video is high quality despite of 240p

  • @TheFrygar
    @TheFrygar 6 років тому +2

    This proof is somewhat disappointing because it only works on acute triangles. If he'd have drawn a triangle with an obtuse angle there would've been extra steps necessary, so the proof is not actually generalized. You can't draw an altitude resulting in a right triangle from the non-obtuse angles in that case.

    • @seandafny
      @seandafny 6 років тому

      Pollen Applebee quit making me feel bad

    • @chunkylover5367
      @chunkylover5367 6 років тому

      Not true. Sin (x) = (180 - x). Acute and obtuse triangles is the same case for sine. You’d be correct if it’s cosine.

    • @rahulram4963
      @rahulram4963 6 років тому

      @@chunkylover5367 sin(x) = (180 - x)?? i dont know if you made an error or not but for example:
      sin(90) = 1 which does NOT equal (180 - 90) = 90
      1 does NOT equal 90, so therefore your claim has been refuted my good sire.

    • @yosephjeong3283
      @yosephjeong3283 5 років тому +1

      @@rahulram4963 I think he ment to say sin(x) = sin(180-x)

    • @rahulram4963
      @rahulram4963 5 років тому

      @@yosephjeong3283 ah that makes more sense. ;p

  • @R4Y4NO
    @R4Y4NO 14 років тому

    you saved my life there :D

  • @eyerusalemassefa722
    @eyerusalemassefa722 3 роки тому

    Tnx men

  • @xxhasudin
    @xxhasudin 17 років тому

    this is easy stuff but it would be much easier to explain if you used values

  • @theneonfire
    @theneonfire 14 років тому

    This video just put me 2 weeks ahead in my maths class xD

  • @cpark1
    @cpark1 12 років тому

    thx man,,,i was boutta fail my test lik real top.

  • @daymare10110
    @daymare10110 14 років тому

    our math teacher taught us "Oscar Has A Hairy Old Ass" Opposite hypotenuse, adjacent hypotenuse, and opposite adjacent. I think I like SOH CAH TOA though

  • @MrMss4
    @MrMss4 15 років тому

    How would that aid the proof?

  • @omkargharat5235
    @omkargharat5235 6 років тому +2

    This is sine rule, am i right?

    • @FullKnight51
      @FullKnight51 4 роки тому

      oh mah god you can read the title? OwO

  • @manoharanpgt5984
    @manoharanpgt5984 7 років тому +1

    very nice

  • @judo1221
    @judo1221 13 років тому

    I wish you were my teacher

  • @tankkong4749
    @tankkong4749 10 років тому

    Why do you divide the equation; is there a reason?

    • @carlsb3rg
      @carlsb3rg 9 років тому

      To make each a side of the equation the ratio between it's angle and corresponding opposite.

  • @Reptilian5491
    @Reptilian5491 11 років тому +1

    is that.. MS paint??

  • @meterotronic
    @meterotronic 13 років тому

    oh...and your favorite word is aribitrary...i've noticed that

  • @catalinmarin8169
    @catalinmarin8169 6 років тому +1

    what about the proof of soh cah toa?

    • @dimitriscollier9918
      @dimitriscollier9918 5 років тому

      There's no proof. It's the definition of sinx ,cosx ,tanx respectively. In fact that's the mnemonic of the definition.

    • @That_One_Guy...
      @That_One_Guy... 5 років тому

      It's like basic definition , people who found trig defines the function as that kind of ratio
      but soh cah toa is mnemonic

  • @Paulorific
    @Paulorific 15 років тому

    Nothing, using the law is just faster.

  • @Arun-ot3so
    @Arun-ot3so 11 років тому

    i remember Saint Oliver's Horse Came Ambeling Home To Oliver's Aunt.
    What is this software

  • @pufalupagus
    @pufalupagus 11 років тому

    science uses greek letters to signify certain variables.

  • @red115dragon
    @red115dragon 14 років тому

    @PTL0
    now THAT is True!!! ;)

  • @магооиу
    @магооиу 3 роки тому

    Anyone watching in 2021 B)

  • @leedavid2396
    @leedavid2396 12 років тому

    Are you greek? You are using the greek alphabet. (alpha and beta)

  • @hobomnky
    @hobomnky 14 років тому

    ily

  • @lpbug
    @lpbug 13 років тому

    @daymare10110 u honestly made me lol irl

  • @DepressedGraduate
    @DepressedGraduate 13 років тому

    lmfao daymare XD

  • @arnoldyu7363
    @arnoldyu7363 11 років тому

    shoosh *pap*

  • @krystian1333
    @krystian1333 12 років тому

    This video explains nothing. So how do you do you solve the problem?

  • @meterotronic
    @meterotronic 13 років тому

    does not help my intuition....your a very intelligent showoff.

  • @caleb7799
    @caleb7799 Рік тому +1

    always skipping the hard part... it's not as clear as you think finding that last term. What makes you think that it would magically work if you don't show the proof?