I really love it too. Technically she's not right though. Sadly, a dog is property. So just like you would be able to get a car back. You would get a dog back. Although I'm happy oreo is with more responsible owners
@David I saw that, and I cried. When the dog ran to the plaintiff and wagged his tail, wanting the plaintiff to pick him up, JJ nodded at him and said, “judgement for the plaintiff. That’s all.”
@@N.DRC. She’s holding on because it’s not proper or respectful to let the dog wandering the court while in session without the explicit permission of the judge. When the judge allowed the dog to wander free, it ignored the plaintiffs, so that is a moot point. And they didn’t steal the dog, the original owner was negligent with the dog by allowing the puppy outside on its own to wander off. They did not chip the dog and there was no direct evidence that this was the same dog they lost. On top of that, the current owners got the dog from a 3rd party - so they didn’t “steal” anything. They were an innocent party in the transaction. Also, the dog does have some rights over being mere property. It would’ve been extremely stressful for the dog to lose the family it has known and loved for the last 2 years. The current family was not negligent. They kept and took care of the dog. It looked happy and healthy. It would’ve been unfair to the dog and current family to take the dog away. Moral of the story: if you love your dog, get it chipped, and don’t be lazy / negligent about the responsibilities of dog ownership. Dogs are more than property, they are sentient companions with feelings and desires of their own. This was a fair judgement.
@duckthelaw9818 you missed the defendant's witness testimony when she said she was annoyed that the neighbors let the dog out to do business on her property. Yes, they were negligent, but the neighbor grabbed their dog & took it to her sisters b/c she couldn't keep the stolen neighbors dog. Of course, had the person not given them the note, they would have been none the wiser. They do not deserve to be rewarded for being good thieves. You're missing the point. So, they steal the dog & and were nice to the dog...hummm, weird 🤔 they didn't get the dog chipped b/c they thought he was already chipped & would reveal...that the dog was stolen. Now guess what...it's clear the dog's not chipped so now, the thieves get to chip their stolen dog.
Probably the same dog, and probably stolen - with some BS story about a present from a co-worker, but the irresponsible plaintiffs can't prove their claim and don't deserve the dog back.
While I agree that it is very likely the same dog, I don't necessarily think that it was stolen. I think it probably wandered over to the neighbors and they fed him because they did not know who it owned him. They probably fell in love with him after a while and decided to keep him, then when the plaintiffs found out later then they made up the story about getting it from a co-worker. With that said, I don't think the plaintiffs cared unless they could get money out of the situation. The dog went around the set and back to the defendants. The plaintiffs never even looked at the dog as it wandered around, I would have been watching my dog like a hawk. I think they made up a story about how much they paid for the dog as well.
@@davidswick8571 … possible. Had a stray wander up, real skittish. Started feeding him and he got along really well with my dog. After about a month there was a knock on the door and when I answered it it was this little girl… She said you can have my dog, he doesn’t come home anymore anyway. Suddenly I was 2 inches tall. I didn’t know. I ended up just giving her everything in my wallet… I would’ve given her back her dog but she was right. He wouldn’t go back. Edit: for the record everything in my wallet at that time in my life was a 20 and some singles…
I'm sorry dog wasn't happy to see them to be honest and dogs know who loves them my dog almost knocked my father down nd hadn't seen him in 2 year's so yeah...
The dog had only been with them for a few (if that is indeed the same one) month's as a puppy, doubt it recognized them. Different story if it was a mature dog i.e. a dog who is 2/3/4 years old.
@Scott Gilliam: I believe it. Look how many reunions there are on YT of soldiers coming home after being overseas for a year or so. The dogs left at home remember! The dogs are practically crying they are so overjoyed. Or the military dogs that are separated from the soldiers they worked with when the soldier is discharged back home. Some of those pairs are separated for years while the soldier files tons of paper work to adopt their soldier dogs. Those dogs are ecstatic when reunited with their handlers. A puppy that young that she didn’t have for that long isn’t going to remember them. The plaintiff was just stupid to let a puppy outside alone for just 5 minutes. It could have been hit by a car. My Boston Terrier is 14 months and I don’t leave her outside alone - and I’m in the country 1/2 mile from a main road. There’s no traffic but there are raccoons, foxes, and occasionally coyotes.
This is all assuming that the lady Christine is lying through her teeth about how she acquired the dog- through a co- worker. Not that the plaintiff wrote a false letter claiming to seen a "stold"- stolen- dog; Had lied about chipping the dog, probably hoping to intimidate the woman into handing the dog over to be taken to a vet, never to be seen again, and had allowed the dog to escape in the first place. Standing there with her lip curled like she was all that, disrespecting the court, she didn't deserve any dog let alone a free dog they'd slied off someone else. Dogs do have rights.
I know someone in my neighborhood who was dumb enough to let a husky puppy that was around 16 weeks old outside unsupervised to go to the bathroom. The dog wandered away and that was the last time the dog was seen near the home. The owner plastered flyers, made social media posts etc for quite some time but the dog was never found. I called it divine intervention for the dog.
I wouldn't call that divine intervention considering you don't know what happened to it. Could've been killed by another dog, a predator, hit by a car, fell in water and drowned, picked up by someone who didn't care for it, etc etc.
@@kateroush2226 The probability of it being hit by a car and not discovered in a residential town is slim. It is also slim that another dog killed the puppy, and it was never discovered deceased or reported. I don't live in New York City. They were looking for the dog all over the town and social media but couldn’t care enough to take proper care of a puppy. Left the puppy in the driveway all afternoon to use the bathroom. The dog could have found a loving home as well. We could argue about what if scenarios comment after comment. It’s completely pointless.
I'm pretty sure JJ knows that's the same dog, but buttom line is they can't prove it plus they're irresponsible, and the dog is already settled with the new family. That's why she put the dog down, to see its reaction, which was. "I don't know you 😅" and to unseat the dog from his family of 2 years, would suck for the dog. Good call.
Mighty funny you have 115 likes stated that this black woman gave Judy the evil eye...goes to show you & all who agrees with you are biased & possibly not a black person. She looks sad...not "EVIL".
@@N.DRC. omg, you could not be further from the truth. Not for one second was my focus on race. My focus was on her expression. Stop trying to cause trouble where there is none. Yes, I am white. And I live in a Black neighborhood. I bought a house here because I love the house. I don’t care what color my neighbors are. There are Hispanic families on the street as well. It’s a quiet, well kept neighborhood, and I love it here. I have Black friends that stop by regularly. Why you feel the need to bring race into this when it doesn’t belong here is beyond me. You and I perceive things differently. You may see sadness but I still see evil.
@@N.DRC. youre probably the same kind of person who says that melanin makes you more empathetic whilst ignoring the black on black violence in the world
@@deborahjeanne2141 that was totally an evil glare. not just an evil glare but an evil tone, too. when the judge asked if she had kids, she responded with 'i do' and the words were just dripping with venom
@@lordlossize you saw the same thing I saw - at the same spot in the clip. Raising the eyebrow, the lip, etc, it was an evil look. And after looking at the clip again, that dog doesn’t look like a yorkiepoo - it looks like a ShihTzu - I have a purebred ShihTzu - I know what one looks like. And my yard is totally fenced.
Anyone who lets their 7 month old dog loose alone in their neighborhood obviously doesn't give a damn about the dog and doesn't deserve to be a pet owner.
Stold LOL.... but chip your dog and go outside with it to potty. I have chihuahuas and they never go out alone! Big dogs or wild animals could kill them, they could be run over or anything. You never let dogs outside alone.
I sometimes help dogsit my grandparent's dog. He'll be 17 this July. Even in his old age we don't let him go potty outside on his own. When you let a puppy go to the bathroom unleashed and unsupervised you've lost the right to be shocked or surprised.
They’re lucky the dog was at least stolen by people who love it and aren’t mistreating it. I never let my dog out of my sight and he’s 4. He listens 90 percent of the time until he sees something like a cat, dog, squirrel….anything or anyone he thinks will play with him then he all of a sudden can’t hear me lol. She was foolish not to have him chipped, and then to let him out unsupervised.
Couple observations: 1) plaintiff didn’t show any interest in reconnecting with a dog they insist was theirs after it was allowed to roam the studio (no stooping over to offering their hands to smell, baby talk, etc.). If i reconnected with a dog I thought was mine, I’d be way more animated. 2) The dog either clearly didn’t remember them or it wasn’t their dog. Based on how it totally ignored them, I leaning toward the latter. 3) The plaintiffs clearly aren’t dog people - what dog lover loses a puppy and doesn’t get another dog after 2 years??? The dog is better off without them.
My dog was chipped to me but after 2 yeas of him being gone and the people who had him was taken care of him and their granddaughter loved him and needed a friend I still think about him and miss him but just glad he is still alive
I love judge Judy! She doesn't miss a thing, and she clearly loves animals and always considers their feelings and what's best for them, even though, in the eyes of the law they are considered property
In two years if the plaintiff really wanted a dog, she should have just got another dog! If this puppy had mattered, she would have went immediately to all neighbors. I think she let put the puppy and then forgot about it until later and by then it was gone.
When i was a teen I had a Siamese who was let out when I was at work. Plastered photos everywhere. 9 months later my brother started dating a girl down the street. He went to her home and found my cat, he ended up taking him back to our house, where he came right to me, remembering me.
How can anyone that claims to love their dog NOT have it chipped??! I think it's even LAW here in Sweden. You can't insure your dog if it's not chipped atleast
Here in Virginia, you can't adopt a dog or cat from a shelter or rescue without getting it vetted and microchipped. As in, it literally CANNOT be released to you unless it's got a microchip.
One of the benefits of getting a dog is taking the dog for walks, bonding with the dog and mutual fitness and company. So many people get a dog and within months they can't be bothered taking the dog for a walk, so they just open the door to let it do its business outside. To me that's cruel to the dog, why get a dog if all you're going to do is lazily open a door for it now and then? Glad they didn't get the dog back.
The only thing that was chipped here is the plaintiff's shoulder. She has a real attitude, I doubt that does her much good in navigating life and didn't do her any good in this case. She needs some massive therapy.
I agree with the verdict. I can't stand when people treat animals nonchalant.And how didn't she know the puppy wouldn't get turned around and lose his way. Just negligent behavior. He could've been hit by a car or anything. Luckily he ended up with the defendants. Get a gold fish.
Dogs are not TOYS. They are not born knowing how to behave. Do not GET a dog if you are not going to research dog/breed care and behavior, and COMMIT to spending adequate time raising the dog. People like that piss me off so much!!
Neighbors steal pets all of the time. Fun fact: I started getting all of mine back when I posted about their "expensive medication" in their lost & found photos.
2 years later? I’m sorry but that woman lost all rights she had to that dog a long time ago, who lets a puppy out to run around no leash unsupervised? She wasn’t responsible anyway so I feel no sympathy for her. P.S. Glad the dog wound up with people that seems to be taking good care of it.
I’d say probably wanted to use it for breeding puppies. They don’t seem emotionally connected as the dog roams around. If that was ever their dog in the first place.
Simple answer: drugs. The plaintiffs could barely enunciate their words. In addition, the husband readily admitted to lying about the dog being chipped. Clearly the plaintiffs were not the sharpest knives in the drawer. I'd be surprised if their combined IQs added up to a triple-digit number.
Out of all of the dogs I've had, I never let them out unsupervised. I walked them on a leash, brought them to the fenced in area in the back on a leash, and kept an eye on them when the leash came off in the fenced in area. You let a dog out on it's own, unless it's professionally trained, don't expect to ever see the dog again.
How can you come to court as a plaintiff and have an attitude like that, how are you going to sway the judge in your light? Admitted Liars and irresponsible lazy owners. Neat toddler metaphor.
I hope they don't ever buy another dog!! Before the plaintiff opened her mouth I noticed something seemed off with her. Just to stupid to care for a dog. I feel sorry for her child!!
If they had actually taken the time to get their puppy chipped, all they would have had to do was take the dog to the vet and scan the chip and they could have proven the dog belonged to them. Instead, they leave a very young puppy outside ALONE, and he disappeared, and now, suddenly, they want to say this lady "STOLE" their dog. It seems to me like the dog is very comfortable with the defendants.
I see my dog all over the place, same markings, same leg length same kind of tail, everything, but I know it’s not my dog because my dog passed away in 2018. I now have a nine year old 1/2 long-haired Chihuahua, 1/4 Yorky, 1/4 Maltese and I wouldn’t let him outside without a leash. People have to give their heads a shake once in a while to get the marbles in place.
The dog is clearly well taken care of! Two years is far too long to try to get back an animal that you lost as a baby! If the animal was full grown that would then be a different story as they would have memory of you. I think they just wanted their dog and tried to say it was the puppy they negligently lost!
A $600 lesson on why you have to be responsible. Off course, there are dogs that are way more expensive. But, even if I didn't pay for it, I wouldn't leave a puppy outside alone for a second.
Wow that was Hard to watch - Judge harsh Go buy another dog Ur not getting it back. No refund no nothing 😳🤣🤣. Should off chipped ur puppy should off not let it out on its own. New owners got them a FREE Dog 😅
I'm going to open the door and let the baby/puppy go out alllllll by itself and bcuz it came back time and time again... until it didn't.... im not going to call the cops and get a police report bcuz I was stupid and wasn't watching my puppy... so 2 and a half years later I found my dog... I thought and guess what 😳 I am going to sue its new owners to try to get it back! WTF?? seriously why even try? This is stupid and a waste of time! That puppy now dog was obviously well taken care of now! You didn't care about the dog at all! Go away miss! Bye 👋
I had someone steal my dog. I found him 2 yeas later but I don't know I should file a police report but he was chipped to me but that didn't matter. I could of took them to court but their granddaughter needed the dog more then me. If it ever happens again I will file a police report and not just one with the pound
I’m sorry they lost there dog, when you have a puppy they will take off there free and nosy. I feel sorry the couple who lost there dog unfortunately the couple who found it didn’t steel there dog your lucky it didn’t get run over by a car ,or truck etc.. the dog is in good hands and well loved. These people should go buy another dog. Look after your puppies when you buy one or get a rescue you should still take good care of your babies.
"The dog has certain rights"- I love it! 😊
I really love it too. Technically she's not right though. Sadly, a dog is property. So just like you would be able to get a car back. You would get a dog back. Although I'm happy oreo is with more responsible owners
I love when she uses her “put down the dog” trick
Regardless she would have ruled for the defendants
Dog exit stage left.
Dog would have recognized them
@David I saw that, and I cried. When the dog ran to the plaintiff and wagged his tail, wanting the plaintiff to pick him up, JJ nodded at him and said, “judgement for the plaintiff. That’s all.”
it's such a Solomon move, she's wise
*Another savage moment:*
JJ: " ... somebody who clearly couldn't spell..."
I fuckingggg died!! “STOLD”
@@apoliticallevi 😂
This is why spelling and grammar are very important. A letter you write may end up in front of Judge Judy. lol
😂😂
This was a good ruling that took the dog’s needs and wants into consideration.
JJ adores dogs and always tries to do right by them.
So the thief gets rewarded for being a good thief...she was holding on to that dog for dear-life praying the dog didn't remember the previous owner.
@@N.DRC. She’s holding on because it’s not proper or respectful to let the dog wandering the court while in session without the explicit permission of the judge. When the judge allowed the dog to wander free, it ignored the plaintiffs, so that is a moot point.
And they didn’t steal the dog, the original owner was negligent with the dog by allowing the puppy outside on its own to wander off. They did not chip the dog and there was no direct evidence that this was the same dog they lost. On top of that, the current owners got the dog from a 3rd party - so they didn’t “steal” anything. They were an innocent party in the transaction.
Also, the dog does have some rights over being mere property. It would’ve been extremely stressful for the dog to lose the family it has known and loved for the last 2 years. The current family was not negligent. They kept and took care of the dog. It looked happy and healthy. It would’ve been unfair to the dog and current family to take the dog away.
Moral of the story: if you love your dog, get it chipped, and don’t be lazy / negligent about the responsibilities of dog ownership. Dogs are more than property, they are sentient companions with feelings and desires of their own.
This was a fair judgement.
@duckthelaw9818 you missed the defendant's witness testimony when she said she was annoyed that the neighbors let the dog out to do business on her property. Yes, they were negligent, but the neighbor grabbed their dog & took it to her sisters b/c she couldn't keep the stolen neighbors dog. Of course, had the person not given them the note, they would have been none the wiser. They do not deserve to be rewarded for being good thieves. You're missing the point. So, they steal the dog & and were nice to the dog...hummm, weird 🤔 they didn't get the dog chipped b/c they thought he was already chipped & would reveal...that the dog was stolen. Now guess what...it's clear the dog's not chipped so now, the thieves get to chip their stolen dog.
Lost her case because of IRRESPONSIBLITY. EASY CASE
Irresponsibility
The note said “person who STOLD” I can hear JJ in my head saying “there’s no such word!” 😅
Probably the same dog, and probably stolen - with some BS story about a present from a co-worker, but the irresponsible plaintiffs can't prove their claim and don't deserve the dog back.
Id think theyd have worked a lot harder to get it back 2 yrs ago when it first disappeared. They shouldnt own another dog
It's bs because they're desperate to keep the dog. JJ would understand that.
While I agree that it is very likely the same dog, I don't necessarily think that it was stolen. I think it probably wandered over to the neighbors and they fed him because they did not know who it owned him. They probably fell in love with him after a while and decided to keep him, then when the plaintiffs found out later then they made up the story about getting it from a co-worker.
With that said, I don't think the plaintiffs cared unless they could get money out of the situation. The dog went around the set and back to the defendants. The plaintiffs never even looked at the dog as it wandered around, I would have been watching my dog like a hawk. I think they made up a story about how much they paid for the dog as well.
@@davidswick8571 … possible. Had a stray wander up, real skittish. Started feeding him and he got along really well with my dog. After about a month there was a knock on the door and when I answered it it was this little girl… She said you can have my dog, he doesn’t come home anymore anyway. Suddenly I was 2 inches tall. I didn’t know. I ended up just giving her everything in my wallet… I would’ve given her back her dog but she was right. He wouldn’t go back.
Edit: for the record everything in my wallet at that time in my life was a 20 and some singles…
@@MemristerBoogieDown
That is so depressing.
Judy is a champ for looking out for the dog's happiness!
It makes me smile to see a doggo run go to it's true owner/friend
I love her and how she considers the dogs rights and feelings.
I'm sorry dog wasn't happy to see them to be honest and dogs know who loves them my dog almost knocked my father down nd hadn't seen him in 2 year's so yeah...
True...my dad's dog was like that.
The dog had only been with them for a few (if that is indeed the same one) month's as a puppy, doubt it recognized them. Different story if it was a mature dog i.e. a dog who is 2/3/4 years old.
@Scott Gilliam: I believe it. Look how many reunions there are on YT of soldiers coming home after being overseas for a year or so. The dogs left at home remember! The dogs are practically crying they are so overjoyed. Or the military dogs that are separated from the soldiers they worked with when the soldier is discharged back home. Some of those pairs are separated for years while the soldier files tons of paper work to adopt their soldier dogs. Those dogs are ecstatic when reunited with their handlers. A puppy that young that she didn’t have for that long isn’t going to remember them. The plaintiff was just stupid to let a puppy outside alone for just 5 minutes. It could have been hit by a car. My Boston Terrier is 14 months and I don’t leave her outside alone - and I’m in the country 1/2 mile from a main road. There’s no traffic but there are raccoons, foxes, and occasionally coyotes.
This is all assuming that the lady Christine is lying through her teeth about how she acquired the dog- through a co- worker.
Not that the plaintiff wrote a false letter claiming to seen a "stold"- stolen- dog;
Had lied about chipping the dog, probably hoping to intimidate the woman into handing the dog over to be taken to a vet, never to be seen again, and had allowed the dog to escape in the first place.
Standing there with her lip curled like she was all that, disrespecting the court, she didn't deserve any dog let alone a free dog they'd slied off someone else. Dogs do have rights.
@@deborahjeanne2141 Exactly my friend!👍👍👍💯
I know someone in my neighborhood who was dumb enough to let a husky puppy that was around 16 weeks old outside unsupervised to go to the bathroom. The dog wandered away and that was the last time the dog was seen near the home. The owner plastered flyers, made social media posts etc for quite some time but the dog was never found. I called it divine intervention for the dog.
That's sad.
I wouldn't call that divine intervention considering you don't know what happened to it. Could've been killed by another dog, a predator, hit by a car, fell in water and drowned, picked up by someone who didn't care for it, etc etc.
@@kateroush2226 The probability of it being hit by a car and not discovered in a residential town is slim. It is also slim that another dog killed the puppy, and it was never discovered deceased or reported. I don't live in New York City. They were looking for the dog all over the town and social media but couldn’t care enough to take proper care of a puppy. Left the puppy in the driveway all afternoon to use the bathroom. The dog could have found a loving home as well. We could argue about what if scenarios comment after comment. It’s completely pointless.
@@kayla_j Doubt it, my money is on the dog being dead at this point.
How is it Divine intervention when neither you or anybody else in the neighborhood knew what happened to that poor puppy?
plaintiff is s l o w
Slow AF
My daughter turtle is faster than her Jesus Christ 😒😂
I'm pretty sure JJ knows that's the same dog, but buttom line is they can't prove it plus they're irresponsible, and the dog is already settled with the new family. That's why she put the dog down, to see its reaction, which was. "I don't know you 😅" and to unseat the dog from his family of 2 years, would suck for the dog. Good call.
she's an irresponsible pet owner. I would never let my dogs outside without a leash, and neither one of them is a puppy
@@Jerseybytes2
Lo9
The plaintiff is giving JJ the evil eye. JJ is not the person to have attitude with. And I’m glad she gives animals rights. I love her for that. ❤️
Mighty funny you have 115 likes stated that this black woman gave Judy the evil eye...goes to show you & all who agrees with you are biased & possibly not a black person. She looks sad...not "EVIL".
@@N.DRC. omg, you could not be further from the truth. Not for one second was my focus on race. My focus was on her expression. Stop trying to cause trouble where there is none.
Yes, I am white. And I live in a Black neighborhood. I bought a house here because I love the house. I don’t care what color my neighbors are. There are Hispanic families on the street as well. It’s a quiet, well kept neighborhood, and I love it here. I have Black friends that stop by regularly. Why you feel the need to bring race into this when it doesn’t belong here is beyond me.
You and I perceive things differently. You may see sadness but I still see evil.
@@N.DRC. youre probably the same kind of person who says that melanin makes you more empathetic whilst ignoring the black on black violence in the world
@@deborahjeanne2141 that was totally an evil glare. not just an evil glare but an evil tone, too.
when the judge asked if she had kids, she responded with 'i do' and the words were just dripping with venom
@@lordlossize you saw the same thing I saw - at the same spot in the clip. Raising the eyebrow, the lip, etc, it was an evil look. And after looking at the clip again, that dog doesn’t look like a yorkiepoo - it looks like a ShihTzu - I have a purebred ShihTzu - I know what one looks like. And my yard is totally fenced.
If it was my dog and he is happy with the new family I will not disrupt his life.
Especially after TWO years!
That's right!
Exactly. If she gave a shit about the dog she would just let it be with someone more caring and responsible.
if they lost a dog like that then they sure not own any pets
She really just wanted $$.
Anyone who lets their 7 month old dog loose alone in their neighborhood obviously doesn't give a damn about the dog and doesn't deserve to be a pet owner.
"LaVaun"??? You need a name change, nappy one
@Anger Horse what does that person's name have to do with anything, anonymous pokeball
@@angerhorse3284 LOL. You're a funny one. No idea why this showed up now after a year but you had me busting up.
@@fortunamajor7239 Ah, now I see why it popped up. Hey, the person's name says it all. Clueless why they have an issue with my name. I love it.
Stold LOL.... but chip your dog and go outside with it to potty. I have chihuahuas and they never go out alone! Big dogs or wild animals could kill them, they could be run over or anything. You never let dogs outside alone.
I sometimes help dogsit my grandparent's dog. He'll be 17 this July. Even in his old age we don't let him go potty outside on his own. When you let a puppy go to the bathroom unleashed and unsupervised you've lost the right to be shocked or surprised.
The plantiff is very irresponsible!
I would never ever let a puppy out without my supervision!!
💯🤦
i don't even let my dog in my fenced backyard out alone. might be a little much, but i don't let her out of my sight.
They’re lucky the dog was at least stolen by people who love it and aren’t mistreating it. I never let my dog out of my sight and he’s 4. He listens 90 percent of the time until he sees something like a cat, dog, squirrel….anything or anyone he thinks will play with him then he all of a sudden can’t hear me lol. She was foolish not to have him chipped, and then to let him out unsupervised.
I wouldn't use the term "stolen", because when I find I puppy or a kitten alone on the streets I TAKE it, not "steal" it!
I agree. I should have put the word “stolen” into quotes since I meant it sarcastically. I completely agree with you both.
SQUIRREL!!
Couple observations: 1) plaintiff didn’t show any interest in reconnecting with a dog they insist was theirs after it was allowed to roam the studio (no stooping over to offering their hands to smell, baby talk, etc.). If i reconnected with a dog I thought was mine, I’d be way more animated. 2) The dog either clearly didn’t remember them or it wasn’t their dog. Based on how it totally ignored them, I leaning toward the latter. 3) The plaintiffs clearly aren’t dog people - what dog lover loses a puppy and doesn’t get another dog after 2 years??? The dog is better off without them.
My dog was chipped to me but after 2 yeas of him being gone and the people who had him was taken care of him and their granddaughter loved him and needed a friend I still think about him and miss him but just glad he is still alive
I love judge Judy! She doesn't miss a thing, and she clearly loves animals and always considers their feelings and what's best for them, even though, in the eyes of the law they are considered property
Judge Judy, Thank you for doing your new show! I love it. You never stop passing on your knowledge! Thank you!
@Steak you do know that this is not her channel right?
@@David-cc8xe I don’t think so cause their name is steak sooo 🤷🏾♀️
@Queen Kamie you have a point there lol
That is one adorable pooch!! 😄
you had me at "stold" 😂
I axed them to correct that.
I can heat JJ in my head saying “ there’s no such word!”
Thank you for all these uploads! Please keep uploading them as I love it 🥰
Thank God the dog have a new home with more responsible owners. Good for him 👏👍
They stole the dog!
In two years if the plaintiff really wanted a dog, she should have just got another dog! If this puppy had mattered, she would have went immediately to all neighbors. I think she let put the puppy and then forgot about it until later and by then it was gone.
She didn't even care enough to pick up his poop after it shits
THEY DID. I KNOW THEM
That dog won't stay put even in the courtroom!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 And this is 2 and a half years after it supposedly took off on the plaintiff!!!
When i was a teen I had a Siamese who was let out when I was at work. Plastered photos everywhere. 9 months later my brother started dating a girl down the street. He went to her home and found my cat, he ended up taking him back to our house, where he came right to me, remembering me.
I can't even imagine letting a puppy out in an unfenced yard.
So careless, I really would question her judgement regarding children.
Ahhhahaha - Case Dismissed --->NO MONEY!
😂 “stold”. 😆
I axe you not to say that.
How can anyone that claims to love their dog NOT have it chipped??!
I think it's even LAW here in Sweden.
You can't insure your dog if it's not chipped atleast
Here in Virginia, you can't adopt a dog or cat from a shelter or rescue without getting it vetted and microchipped. As in, it literally CANNOT be released to you unless it's got a microchip.
One of the benefits of getting a dog is taking the dog for walks, bonding with the dog and mutual fitness and company.
So many people get a dog and within months they can't be bothered taking the dog for a walk, so they just open the door to let it do its business outside. To me that's cruel to the dog, why get a dog if all you're going to do is lazily open a door for it now and then?
Glad they didn't get the dog back.
The only thing that was chipped here is the plaintiff's shoulder. She has a real attitude, I doubt that does her much good in navigating life and didn't do her any good in this case. She needs some massive therapy.
I agree with the verdict. I can't stand when people treat animals nonchalant.And how didn't she know the puppy wouldn't get turned around and lose his way. Just negligent behavior. He could've been hit by a car or anything. Luckily he ended up with the defendants. Get a gold fish.
lmao "stold"
Judge Judy doesn’t play about dogs and I love it
I agree with JJ on this. 💯
When plaintiff is asked "is that the truth?" Response "no." Typical 🤣
Yolanda is a real charmer
Dogs are not TOYS. They are not born knowing how to behave. Do not GET a dog if you are not going to research dog/breed care and behavior, and COMMIT to spending adequate time raising the dog. People like that piss me off so much!!
If they really wanted the dog back. You would think they would kneel down and say hi to the dog. But it was careless.
Omg I can’t believe people write it as they say it “STOLD” are you kidding me lmaoooooo
Neighbors steal pets all of the time. Fun fact: I started getting all of mine back when I posted about their "expensive medication" in their lost & found photos.
The plaintiff was really something.2 years That dogs was gone, & all of sudden wanna sue to get it back? Come on!! That was pet neglect on their part.
2 years later? I’m sorry but that woman lost all rights she had to that dog a long time ago, who lets a puppy out to run around no leash unsupervised? She wasn’t responsible anyway so I feel no sympathy for her. P.S. Glad the dog wound up with people that seems to be taking good care of it.
They only wanted the dog back so they could sell it. Money is the only drive. So sad. Glad dog didn’t go back to her.
Where do you get that from? Just curious 🤔
@@mscaligurl76 wondering the same
@@mscaligurl76 Facts... They spent almost $700 on it just to resell it ?!... Makes no sense.
I’d say probably wanted to use it for breeding puppies. They don’t seem emotionally connected as the dog roams around. If that was ever their dog in the first place.
Good call JJ this couple is despicable. A random letter yeah okay
Chileee that letter says “stold your dog “ fix it Jesus 😭
2.5 years later...
Leaving both of them, doesn't want to be with any of them.
Those people were pretty bland. That woman face when JJ said she was not giving them the dog. Lol why?
Simple answer: drugs. The plaintiffs could barely enunciate their words. In addition, the husband readily admitted to lying about the dog being chipped. Clearly the plaintiffs were not the sharpest knives in the drawer. I'd be surprised if their combined IQs added up to a triple-digit number.
@@jasonhurd4379 wow, harsh assumption that they are on drugs. How do you arrive at that conclusion 🤔
@@jasonhurd4379 drugs ?? Really
“So you were lazy…” JJ 😂😂😂
True 😂
The judge knows. You don’t let your dog run free
she lied on her complaint
That was the defendant's answer, not the plaintiff's sworn complaint.
If you let a dog out without a leash or person you don't need animals
The plaintiffs were so cold toward the dog. Glad it wasn’t given to them
Wow, that dog is a cutie!!
Out of all of the dogs I've had, I never let them out unsupervised. I walked them on a leash, brought them to the fenced in area in the back on a leash, and kept an eye on them when the leash came off in the fenced in area. You let a dog out on it's own, unless it's professionally trained, don't expect to ever see the dog again.
Most dogs are going to remember people even after two years if they have a real bond 💯
In sure the defendant has let a she three year old out and expected them to return per her instructions 😂
Dogs are awesome people
How can you come to court as a plaintiff and have an attitude like that, how are you going to sway the judge in your light? Admitted Liars and irresponsible lazy owners. Neat toddler metaphor.
In Australia we have to have microchipped.
‘Stole’ for the win!
That dog was most likely hers, but judging on her irresponsibility, I'm glad she didn't get it back
I hope they don't ever buy another dog!! Before the plaintiff opened her mouth I noticed something seemed off with her. Just to stupid to care for a dog. I feel sorry for her child!!
If they had actually taken the time to get their puppy chipped, all they would have had to do was take the dog to the vet and scan the chip and they could have proven the dog belonged to them. Instead, they leave a very young puppy outside ALONE, and he disappeared, and now, suddenly, they want to say this lady "STOLE" their dog. It seems to me like the dog is very comfortable with the defendants.
Haha. Glad she didn't get the dog back. Didn't care enough about it to supervise it when it was outside. HORRIBLE pet owner
She damn sure will let her kids out unsupervised......
Prisons full of kids that were unsupervised during childhood......
Dogs will remember you from years away
If I spent $695 for a dog, I would be out side with that dog at all times, watching it like a hawk.
love it
They wrote the note themselves!
I see my dog all over the place, same markings, same leg length same kind of tail, everything, but I know it’s not my dog because my dog passed away in 2018. I now have a nine year old 1/2 long-haired Chihuahua, 1/4 Yorky, 1/4 Maltese and I wouldn’t let him outside without a leash.
People have to give their heads a shake once in a while to get the marbles in place.
$695 lesson
The dog is clearly well taken care of! Two years is far too long to try to get back an animal that you lost as a baby! If the animal was full grown that would then be a different story as they would have memory of you.
I think they just wanted their dog and tried to say it was the puppy they negligently lost!
A $600 lesson on why you have to be responsible. Off course, there are dogs that are way more expensive. But, even if I didn't pay for it, I wouldn't leave a puppy outside alone for a second.
The word stole was misspelled on that letter. It says "stold."
Wow that was Hard to watch - Judge harsh Go buy another dog Ur not getting it back. No refund no nothing 😳🤣🤣. Should off chipped ur puppy should off not let it out on its own. New owners got them a FREE Dog 😅
The person in charge of posting these videos are shady as he'll with the titles and should be fired.
I gave dogs certain rights...lmao
LOL, they actually wrote in the note "Stold". Stay in school kids!
The attitude gets me
Cute 🐶
Mixed feelings
Same
I'm going to open the door and let the baby/puppy go out alllllll by itself and bcuz it came back time and time again... until it didn't.... im not going to call the cops and get a police report bcuz I was stupid and wasn't watching my puppy... so 2 and a half years later I found my dog... I thought and guess what 😳 I am going to sue its new owners to try to get it back! WTF?? seriously why even try? This is stupid and a waste of time! That puppy now dog was obviously well taken care of now! You didn't care about the dog at all! Go away miss! Bye 👋
I had someone steal my dog. I found him 2 yeas later but I don't know I should file a police report but he was chipped to me but that didn't matter. I could of took them to court but their granddaughter needed the dog more then me. If it ever happens again I will file a police report and not just one with the pound
The plaintiffs see the dog as a thing, not a living being. They think that because they purchased the animal it is only property. Shame on them.
These people don't deserve or need a dog !😊
Cute dog 🐕
when yo go before jj, you must have your ducks in a row
They would have done it so they believe they won't have to pick up dog poop
“Stold” 😂
She wanted that moment again lol
WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN FUNNY....IF THE DOG WOULD PEED ON THE PLAINTIF,S LEG!
I’m sorry they lost there dog, when you have a puppy they will take off there free and nosy. I feel sorry the couple who lost there dog unfortunately the couple who found it didn’t steel there dog your lucky it didn’t get run over by a car ,or truck etc.. the dog is in good hands and well loved. These people should go buy another dog. Look after your puppies when you buy one or get a rescue you should still take good care of your babies.
The dog knew them but felted they give him away I think.