JM acting like all seniors are timid peaceful people. I’ve seen with my own eyes older people spitting and cursing at young adults over an argument and using all sorts of racial and derogatory words.
@@lashundavis156 She instantly wrote the defendant off over an age difference. This is biased from the beginning. Because I’m young I must be the aggressor? I’ve been the guy honking and had people older than me got out of their car cursed at me and drove off. JM is dead wrong on this
I agree.... old people are definitely the worst. They act like their age gives them the pass to say and do whatever. I think she was clouded by judgement because she herself is closer in age to the plaintiff than the defendant. And spitting at someone is definutely assault.
In this case...i really feel that the defendant was telling the truth. There ARE old folks out there that behave just like he described. This case left me a bad taste....sad
I’ve worked in customer service for close to 20 years now.. Elderly people can be the absolute worst but when a superior comes out they turn into a sweet loving person ..don’t ever judge a book by it’s cover. They can be some of the most cruel vile name-calling customers that I ever encountered..
Yes!, the judge didn't even give a chance at even believing the old man could have done anything like that at all... she went way too far. She must live with the higher uos because. I see this happening on a daily basis of old people starting crap with younger people even after that telling younger people after harassing them to respect their elders lol.... lmao! Alot of these old timers have lost their minds... With all that said I freaking love judg Milian... it's just like 5% I would totally disagree with her and this is one of those times... She even tried baiting him into getting angry which failed... she tried multiple times and didn't work..... I was like dude please don't get angry she trying to bait you into it....DON'T....LMAO!
So agree. Its as if there is an entitlement. I have seen this too often and it is embarressing. I am 68 years old and have never disrespected someone due to age, race or religion. Even if the individual is disrespectful to me I just leave them at where they are and take my dgnity with me. This plantiff gives me the wrong vibes.
@@Fyrn33 I’ve known enough men like him in my life to know this isn’t true. The judge has power over him and is an aggressive, blunt person who has no problem yelling at and putting people in their place. An old quiet couple in a car? Easy targets for that type of anger. Although I do also think the older couple weren’t completely honest too. But men like him only target those who he perceives to be less powerful than he is so that he can feel powerful.
They DEFINITELY weren’t being truthful. They were entirely too forgetful and basically said the same thing about the conversation as if they rehearsed it. The judge had to put the words in the lady’s mouth to get an idea of what was said. She also hit the nail on the head for this entire exchange without even realizing it. The older guy never felt like he was in danger. I wholeheartedly believe he spat in the younger guy’s face and was basically an a**hole throughout the exchange, including what he allegedly said about the wife and children. All this was backed up in his closing- he thought he could take the guy due to his time served. Her judgment was undoubtedly correct, but her assessment of the situation was wayyyy off on this one.
Agreed lol old people were 100% lying and judge ruled with them because their seniors and acted innocent, I’ve first handed seen how rude and disrespectful the older generation of people are, especially when it comes to the younger generations. Without a doubt that old ass man spit at that guy twice and called him names, I don’t believe he called his children names though but definitely his and his wife or just the man. Then his comment at the end with his dumb ass badge, lmfao some 50 year old military trainings not going to save you against someone who fights. Wasn’t worried about it until his entire face is fractured and broken, that generation has no respect and thinks their all high and mighty until their shown otherwise, as a retail manager I deal with hundreds of them a day. They were absolutely dishonest and disrespectful, thankfully he didn’t injure his old ass and nobody was harmed.
Only an old person would call children 'little bastards', because young people don't see it as a stigma to have children out of wedlock and probably don't even realise the true significance of the word 'bastard', also the old man knew that he could aggravate the young man by insulting his wife and children as well as spitting in his face, why else would the old man have rolled down his window?...
The name calling "bastard" does not implicate what it once did...It doesn't mean kids out of wedlock like it once did...It is now more like asshole....And can I just say that plaintiff's wife needs 2 quit smoking...She sounds like a gravel road...
Defendant is actually very well controlled and respectful. Plaintiff totally did it. JM is massively wrong and I’m glad all the comments see it too. Now, he still needs to pay for it legally. But morally he was well justified. Getting spat on twice and all he did was hit a car instead of a person. Applause to his self control.
@Saphthings When it comes to the law, comments sections are meaningless. Any sociopath online can come comment and claim "poor defendant" , the long and short of it is that the defendant escalated the situation regardless and easily could have wound up shot and killed. Think on that before thinking what the majority write in comments is "correct" LOL.
I do believe there was truth to what the defendant said, especially after the plaintiff brought up at the end his combat badge. I believe the judge mistaken their age as some sweet old man, but honestly I kept thinking how sweet are you to stop in traffic not move then a crazy man walks up on you & you keep your window down and don't flinch??? I questioned if he was once that 34yr old tempered man but he's 66 now! He surely was not afraid!
I agree, I think the old man has a little temper too. The judge acted like cause he was 66 he wouldn't do that. I've met alot of older people who behave badly!
@@stephaniehowe0973 His wife wasn't involved and the older wife timidly lied. Spitting on someone can be a criminal offense. It may not seem like a battery in the sense of punching or kicking someone, but If you express your anger, frustration, or disgust with another person by spitting in their face (or anywhere on their person), that is precisely the criminal charge you could be facing. The old guy expressed the road rage.
I think the judge got ahead of herself a little there. What the man said about his combat certification at the end most definitely says something about his attitude as well. I do believe the older gentleman is just as aggressive as the defendant. He just made sure to have good behavior in court 😂
Yeah, he probably did spit when the defendant got in his face, but the defendant clearly started it and was the aggressor. Personally, I find it astounding that people who know - or at least should know - they're in the wrong are often the first to "double down" and makes matters even worse.
@@andrewryder3075 I think they both were equally disrespectful to each other. The defendant did start it for sure by beeping the horn and the plaintiff played into it by sitting his car right there to piss the guy off even more. Both of them had the opportunity to big the bigger person but none did.
@@sarinalashawn Agreed. I certainly wasn't trying to imply that the plaintiff was blameless; most people faced with an angry driver angrily would just drive away if he/she started to approach. Still, the defendant has to have pretty poor self-control to ditch his family in the middle of the street just to berate another driver for intentionally delaying him.
you've got to be kidding! the younger guy was wrong at everything he did that day. Older guy was entitled and lacked good judgement and did not help deescalate the situation but the defendant was 100% the aggressor and deserved to lose the case
@@puzzliteBINGO! The defendant is an arrogant little bully who couldn’t tell the truth if his vulnerable family depended on it…left them directly IN HARM’S WAY in the car, in the middle of the road!! 😔
I believe the judge had a bad day on this episode, They both were trying to show who is the "big bad wolf in the den" and were both equally responsible for what happened that day. This was an episode I wish I hadn't seen. I'm very disappointed on how she reacted to one and not both
Judge is SO wrong!! There are a lot of old men, that would do exactly what the defendant is saying! She just hates aggressive annoying drivers, and took it out on him!
@That Tunisian Crochet Life dear GOD getting out of a car and walking over to someone is not “putting their life in danger”. These inconsiderate boomers lied and got away with it.
@@ellipsis5345 They surely did by virtue of their age. The Judge bombed by believing the younger carried the rage. No No No! The older one expressed the worst rage with derogatory language and spitting. Was the young man guilty yes but not of road rage and the judge did not see that.
@That Tunisian Crochet Life the judge got one thing wrong, the plaintiff was lying when he recited his story. Watch it again if you want. He said the defendant honked his horn twice. Once when he tried to get into the lane, and then a second time when the light just turned green. But somehow even with the light having just turned green, the plaintiff was still parked there giving the defendant enough time to get out of his car and walk over to him to yell at him and punch his car? you can tell right here he's lying about something. IT doesn't add up, this story cannot be true. unless you add in like "the light was green but I decided to stay there just to piss him off" to start, which ruins the 'meek older man' image they're trying to sell here.
Spitting on another person isn't harassment, but actually assault with bodily fluid witch is even more worse. For anyone that has the balls to go ahead and spit on someone else is absolutely outrageous and they deserve every single thing that comes there way from the criminal charges and all the way to them getting there behind beaten to a pulp along with everything in between.
She does say that it was father's day and the cop didn't want to do paperwork. I assume she knows. Could be wrong. Have family in law enforcement. They say it's more of an add on charge. Majority of the time it escalates to a physical fight. It's probably the most disrespectful thing you could do. With that said it's old dudes word against his. Also given his age during time of this taping he would have been drafted during Vietnam. That CIB he wears most likely gotten him spat on when he got home from a war he probably didn't volunteer for. Just got lucky and made it back home. I'll take the old man's word on this one. Dude looks like a hot head. But yeah totally agree that spitting on someone is the worst.
I find very few actually are under their surface. I disagree with the judge’s bias in believing the foggy vague testimony of the plaintiff over the calm factual testimony of the defendant.
Don't let the plaintiff and his wife fool you into thinking they're innocent. The way the word "pissed" came out of her mouth was way too easy. 😆 😂 Beside if he has such a bad temper why didn't he show any angry when the judge was dropping the hammer on his head over and over. A 66 yr old man can with combat behind him can get crazy too.
@That Tunisian Crochet Life how would you react if a court of law took the old boomers’ side just because they’re old? Their testimony was vague and foggy and they didn’t answer half the questions. I’d be appalled at what was happening before my eyes.
You missed the most important thing she said... Whether these geriatric folks did any of that this guy still damaged their car & that's all that matters in her ruling.
I thought I was the only one!!! AND spitting is an assault not harassment. Just because they’re older doesn’t mean they act right. I didn’t like this episode, the judge herself looked like she was getting angry lol talk about anger management 🙄.
The fact that the defendant stayed calm and cool while being screamed at tells me he doesn't have an anger issue. Now if someone spits at me, you better believe I'd do something.
The defendant could barely contain himself. He immediately used argumentative language when it was his turn to speak. After he realized the judge believe he wasn’t the victim in this whole thing, his posture changed. The way he had his arms straight and hands behind his back, His facial expressions -the strained, pursed lips and mostly his inability to just keep his mouth shut even after the judge told him to multiple times are all telltale signs that he has impulse control/aggression issues. Patient people don’t get out of their car to approach another car…. Passive-aggressive people will tirelessly blow their horn. The old man may not have been the saint he claimed, but this guy pushed his way into traffic “putting his family in harms way” as he puts it, then got out of his car and approached another car. The defendant has issues that he barely controlled in court.
@@yung1717 oh no! Someone in the internet disagrees with me. How ever will I prove myself to someone who’s opinion I could give two shits less about….. 😆😆
People need to control their anger as you never know who you will confront. There are so many people on the news getting killed over something like this. So unnecessary
I'm with the young guy with the wife and kids...people ABSOLUTELY DO come to a stop waaaaay back from the light, and often there will be three or four cars doing that, so the lane is backed up much further than it should be! My guess is, people start texting as they are approaching the redlight, and couldn't care less how their movements are affecting everybody around them
I work in Emergency and while old people can behave poorly, you are at greater risk of harm from young/middle age people. So while an older person might be grumpy and nasty, a I'm actually more afraid of what a young person would do
Everyone that yell’s or retaliates out of anger has anger issues yet she doesn’t like something someone says, she starts to yell at them like a lunatic . How does she expect to ppl to always stay calm , yet she can never control her emotions? Lmao! IRONIC
Yelling was not the issue. did you even listen to the case. People yell all the time. My parents yelled all the time. Judges yell. Police yell. That's a normal sign of anger. What is crazy is Illegally blocking traffic, getting out of your car to go confront someone and kicking their door in. Thats the abnormal part
Really? About what? The defendant’s story has more holes than swiss cheese! Not to mention he has some serious facking anger issues. For the love of God he has *three* SMALL children in the car!! If he had politely honked and the plaintiff was being a d1ck, he can just sit and wait. Not get out of his car to ‘politely ask’ the plaintiff to move. 🙄🙄🙄 I cant imagine what being married to him is like not to mention being his kids 😒
@Christopher Moore the plaintiffs are lying about their passive meek exchange. Their story didn't make sense. "He honked at me to move at the red light. He honked again when the light just turned green -- he had the time to still come out of his car to walk up to the side of my door to yell at me and then hit my car even though he had honked a second time because the light was green" See where that doesn't make sense? Why were they still there if the light was green?
I might be totally wrong but I feel the plaintiff and his wife are very good actors in looking so sweet in the court. Plus I feel JM had a clear bias from the start for the plaintiff. Just because two people don't "look like" people who could be nasty, does not mean they are not. I do believe the plaintiff spat in the face of the defendant, which is an assault.
The fact that the other guy's wife is NOT there in court speaks volumes!!! It's because she knows that her husband is a hothead and didn't want to lie to the judge. I believe the old folks. I don't believe the other guy.
@@kycutecool5891 IT was in the police report though, but it wasn't conclusive because it was just heresay and not physical evidence (he wasn't going to leave spit on him if it did happen)
I spent 15 years working in nursing homes. It's quite possible he did spit in the man's face, been there 🤣. That said the younger fella started it and seemed like a smug, easy to anger shithead. Only a video of the incident would tell the whole truth.
You got that right!! 20 years working in nursing homes some of them want to cut your heart out with a spoon 😉 poor things. Some of them know what they're doing but most don't.
I think it should also include the word, “So…”. Everyone would pass out drunk! The defendant seems like a real a**hole with serious anger issues. The plaintiff needs to face reality that at 66, that the “CI” pin on his lapel won’t resuscitate him once a crazed person shoots, stabs or stomps on him in a future road rage incident. Stay in the car, Pops, and don’t get out!
@ggyytgcvc The litigants file their case and the Judge reads their statements prior to them being on-camera. Getting out of a car in a Road Rage incident is never a good idea, the aggressor is always wrong in these cases unless he'd been shot & killed.
@@kycutecool5891 wish I could agree, but unless he was deaf or something and didn't hear anything, then of course he couldn't have moved his car up a bit. But when a person just sits there with this azzhole screaming for him to move up, and hitting the horn yelling at him to move up some, and this goes on an and on and on? At what point does "I don't understand why this guy is yelling at me to move up and beeping his horn at me to move", change to "fck that azzhole I'm not moving no got dam where". Just sayn. Human nature. Doesn't make sense? Unless the guy truly had zero space to move up some? If so, then no problem? If not, i just can't buy it. What explanation, besides he got friggin pissed cuz the azzhole kept blaring on the horn. It happens all the the time, people hate to get the horns blaring at them it pisses people off. Their reaction is to usually do the opposite of what that person with the horn wants. Watch, next time ur at a stop light and it turns green, if the person doesn't go right away, start blaring down ur horn and see what happens. Yell for them to go! Then come back here and be honest, cuz that person will might just stay at that light, to be sure u miss the green. I've seen it happen a lot. Not sure why. But it does. Can't see the guy smiling happy, loving all the horn play and yelling, and think nah I better not move up. It makes no sense to me. Jus my opinion.
Agreed. The boomers couldn’t answer half the questions and had almost no details about the situation. They lied and the judge didn’t go off the facts like she does in every other case. The judgement was not correct.
I think spitting on or at someone is the most vile, disgusting, rude, nasty, no class thing someone can do. I have only had someone do it once, at middle school age...As a now adult, if anyone EVER spits at me, they will then be rendered spitless immediately...
I used to work in a restaurant and I can honestly say that I have dealt with more disrespectful elderly people than younger people. It is not out of the ordinary for someone elderly to be rude, disrespectful and nasty. The defendant definitely should have paid for the damages he did to the car. However, her excuse for him being elderly is not an excuse. I’m not sure how I feel about this case
I served with quite a few recipients of the Combat Infantry Badge. Most haven’t been a-holes. The plaintiff instigated and probably did what the defendant claimed. Both are hotheads.
Why is that your concern? Why isn't the guy getting out of his car BEFORE that your bigger concern? What if he'd been carrying a gun? ohhhh noooo, spit!
Its actually simple assault and hardly ever charged. Another thing the law does in fact look at what a person does to cause an action. You come at me like defendant did, I probably wouldn't spit, but I would pull my knife or pepper spray.
The old guy could very easily have spat at him, and insulted him, but law wise he still can't punch the car. Sometimes you can just get fed up with people trying to bully you. I've been in a road rage situatin where a woman twice my size, stormed out of her car to point her finger in my face and rage. and yep...even though I'm this slight of a girl got out of the car and stood up to her! She backed off and went back to her car. Most bullies are too cowardice to follow through.
The defendant's story about the plaintiff calling the wife and kids names, and then spitting just isn't believable. Sounds like justification for his own road rage.
The judge's mind was made up after the first three minutes. Why would the plaintiff be wearing a CIB, a military badge, on civilian clothing? The plaintiff strikes me as one of those old farts who want to enforce laws on their own, like driving in the left lane at 49 mph in a 50 zone. I believe that there was plenty of room ahead of the plaintiff but he wanted to prove a point to the other younger driver..
@@kycutecool5891 If JM rules in a favor of a woman she is biased against men. If JM rules in favor of whites/hispanics/Asians over black people she is a racist. If she gives her opinion on specific issues, then she is either a right wing, loud mouthed B or a blatant feminist depending on what day it is. People are always calling this judge out for something no matter what she does. But those same people never miss an episode. 😂
I agree. She didn't even let the defendant speak and that's the 1st time I've ever seen her railroad someone like that. I don't know what it was. My thing was why did the man stay there long enough for there to be an altercation? I mean if the light turned green then start driving, why hang around? That seems like a simple question that she would have asked because at that point the Plaintiff has his ego involved. I really can't speak to whether the defendant was telling the truth or not because she cut him off so much that he never got a chance to speak and that's the 1st and only time that I've been able to say that.
Tbh I feel like the plaintiff did instigate and spit at him only because old people think that their age makes them look fragile and innocent and can do no wrong
Everyone saying they’re on the defendant’s side is delusional. This guy is so aggressive he can’t even let the judge finish a sentence without getting hyped up. If he can’t control himself in court, he absolutely didn’t control himself on the road
I feel like the case was over as soon as JM saw the plaintiff and defendant. I don’t know what happened but I do know that because of the both sides ages and looks she believed one over the other. The whole thing made me so angry with JM. They both were judged right for the beginning and court should never be held like that.
Again. Righteous anger. Most people are reasonable despite how the internet makes it seem. He behaved terribly. Raged at someone, punched their car. Now he tried to lie to make himself look good. How could you not tell that he was making everything up..? Dang...
I think he totally lied about the plaintiff calling his kids and wife out their name, but do believe it's possible that the old guy spit on him. But defendant was aggressor as he got out the car
I believe the defendant. I’ve had old people yell at me and treat me like complete crap for absolutely no reason other than their completely miserable lives
I 100% don’t think that old man is innocent. 66 year old men are more angry and aggressive driving and with poor retail workers that I think she was dead wrong. I know the other dude was not innocent either but I know that old man did not just sit in his car like Dalai Lama.
No, I highly doubt he did, Ma'am. I really do. There is no statement from police. It was a fabrication by the defendant. And even if he did. Who got out to confront the other driver? Who punched the car? It sure as heck wasn't the plaintiff! The defendant really put one over you, it seems.
I’m a a woman boomer and I agree with you. I don’t do this, but every man my age that I know curses and rages in traffic. I think the judge went off the wrong direction on this one.
Agreed. This is the only time so far I totally disagree with the judge. The plaintiffs couldn’t answer half the questions and left so many blanks. Any other litigant would have lost over that alone. So disappointed these rude self-important boomers got away with this.
@@ellipsis5345 watch the case again, notice the plaintiff's story is impossible. "He honked the horn once, then when the light turned green honked his horn again" ... "THEN he got out of his car and walked up to my side and yelled at me and then hit my car" while the light was green? You mean old man was just sitting there not moving at a green light?
The defendent doesn't seem to understand that sticks and stones can break his bones but words can never physically hurt him. Foolish prideful man set a bad example for his wife and kids. Always behave in the Fruit of the Spirit for the sake of ourselves and society.
actually words can hurt someone... especially if those words are racist. totally different topic from this case, but you're going into a whole other pond of nope. and it's usually 99% white people that use that phrase thinking they can get away w anything they say to poc.
This is why you don't take your case to these TV shows. The "judge" clearly went off assumptions rather than discuss the facts of the case. She immediately had bias once she heard the old man say the guy beeped his horn.
Get a dash cam people. I’ve had so many people stop road raging as soon as they saw my cam. The defendant is a total liar. He’s the irrational road rager and made everything up to justify his insane actions.
So this older Man heard absolutely nothing the judge said. He's talking about a war medal he got 100years ago Sir! This is a different world be safe and drive Off! Smh
Non verbal communication never lies. When the old man said he didn't call the children bastards, his head nodded yes. I believe he did curse at the defendant's family. Old people can be extremely vindictive just for the hell of it. Not saying that what the defendant did was wrong- it was definitely dumb smhhhhh- but I do believe he was provoked by the guy, who outback just wanted to feel 25 years younger for a second and showboat in front of his wife for a second. I kinda feel bad for the defendant.... even though he was definitely dumb. I think he was just too excited to get back to the grandparents' house to get the celebrations going. Definitely should practice some more patience.... but I think the plaintiff really did do it.
I think that both the plaintiff and defendant weren’t telling the truth. Just because the plaintiff is in his 60’s doesn’t mean he was afraid. Why didn’t he drive off when the light turned green? Why would he stay there and engage with a crazy man? The defendant’s attitude with the judge didn’t help him in this case. I like judge Milan but she took the plaintiffs side way too quick. His story didn’t make sense either. Both him and his wife can’t “remember” what the defendant was screaming at them. I don’t believe that at all.
Caiazza is a little man-child with such rage he left his family IN THE CAR IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD with oncoming traffic!!! 😮 He’s a true crime podcast waiting to happen…
Spitting on someone is definitely assault. If you throw water on someone its fine but anything else is assault... I think she just got hung up on the kids part and father's day and teaching the "crazy" guy a lesson. Probably why she started talking even faster so no one would catch that lol
That's not the point though. He charged to the plaintiff's car, damaged it. Whether the plaintiff spit (which is quite clearly a fabrication since there's nothing on it directly from the police) or not does not matter. He lost his cool. He damaged the car. He pays.
@@kycutecool5891 I'm not negating that, I'm just saying the plaintiff should've been held accountable for what he did. She said herself, as a former prosecuter she knows that they PO just didn't want to do the paperwork. If the PO acknowledged the assault, that would be even more paperwork. The crazy guy is at fault but I feel like that old guy is playing up the old card. Even the Judge said "does he look like he would do that?" and the old man went with it
@@marycollins5823 Fair enough. If he did, I agree. But I really don't believe the spitting happened. Otherwise it would have appeared clearly in the police report. Both turned the same thing in. The officer did not acknowledge that such a thing occurred.
You guys are missing her point You don't act like an animal with your wife and kids in tow That's in his kids heads how to handle conflict We have enough hot heads these days, over 99.99% of the time, nothing
YES EXACTLY OMG THANK YOU People going on and on about bias and spitting and the elderly folk lying In the end.. Who got out of his car to yell at someone? Who punched the car? Wasn't the plaintiff!
Judge Millian to old guy: "heh heh I'm a dick in traffic sometimes." Judge Millian to young guy: "HOW DARE YOU BE A DICK IN TRAFFIC ON FATHER'S DAY! THAT MUST MEAN YOU HAVE ANGER ISSUES!"
@That Tunisian Crochet Life old man got out too, yet her take for that isn’t “Omg you’re a psycho! You have anger problems! Reee 😡 “ it’s “oh you silly old geezer, you’re so cute and your judgment is so silly Willy you widdle guy! So cute! 🥰 “ She was being a total buffoon in this case. The defendant was wrong, and so was the plaintiff. Suddenly she’s not talking about macho behavior back and forth when that’s exactly what this is.
About a year ago I cut off this Mexican dude, I tried to apologise to him but he wouldn't have it, so he decided to break my driver side window with a pair of pliers, and try to drag me out of the car. What he didn't realize is that my laborer was a lot bigger and stronger than him. So in the next 3 minutes my laborer just beat the living tar out of this guy on the side of the road. Then the cops showed up and arrested him for reckless driving, assault and battery, road rage, DUI, possession of methamphetamine, possession of paraphernalia...I guess he proved his point.
I disagree. I think the defendant was barely containing himself. His posture, with his arms tensely at his sides,his face tightened and his pursed lips. And the fact that even after the judge told him to be quiet multiple times, he could barely stop himself from speaking. The mere fact that he did something stupid, pushed his way out into traffic and then felt entitled enough to think the other driver had to get out of his way? He even admits to “putting his family in harms way.” THEN he gets out of his car to approach the other car… people who do that aren’t doing it to be polite about their request. That defendant has self control issues.
I see a lot of comments saying I don't believe the old ppl... & that's fine. These two men can yell & cuss at each other all they want... But neither of them have the right to put their hands on each other or each other's property... & that's what her ruling comes down to... This case isn't about morality it's about damages.
WHAT? The judge is just presuming without any evidence whatsoever, that the old man is a polite, kind old man, and that the young man is rude and aggressive, but there are many old men that would say exactly what the defendant claims he said, and for the young defendant to make up a sentence that only an old man would most definitely say 'little bastards' is not something a young person would say, nor know to make up. And I totally believe that the old man spat in his face and of course the plaintiff's wife is going to back him up, why wouldn't she, she is as vile as him. And the old man even said he wasn't afraid, in fact he even got out of his car to get the license plate number. The judge is so biased and so wrong about the young defendant, his comportment throughout her reprimand shows me he has total self control...
The weirdest thing about the comments is all the people claiming they see some kind of rage behind the defendant’s eyes. Lmao. Seeing what you want to see. This man was calm, collected, and recounted what happened. Meanwhile The arrogant, disrespectful boomers can’t answer half the judge’s questions and gave a foggy testimony with very few details. Lots of shrugged shoulders and “I don’t know”‘s. Flexing that little badge on his outfit at the end PROVED how self-important, self-absorbed, and arrogant the plaintiff was and he DEFINITELY did all the things the defendant claimed.
Even IF that was all true.....the defendant didn't have the space to make the turn in the first place so it's LITERALLY ALL his fault. If you can't safely make a turn....you HAVE to WAIT
These old folks strike me as liars. Judge was inappropriately harsh to the defendant though he should have hauled his family in to back his story and things may have gone different.
The young dude didn't get much of a word in edgewise. The judge was completely bias. Old people can be arrogant and grumpy and he probably did get pissed for getting honked at. It bugged me at the end when the old codger thought he was superior and special because he had an army badge. I'm in my later 50's and I don't shove my USMC vet status into people faces.
The old guy and his wife are lying. I'll bet he did all the things the defendant says he did. As soon as he said he was trained in combat I knew he had intense aggression.
Even just showing it off was irrelevant. Just more proof that he’s one of the bad boomers that I completely believe did the things the defendant claimed.
J.M. needs anger management on this one gezz .. and I tend to belive the Defendant because you can exit the vehicle and ask someone to do a favor/help out w/o being angry
I dont know if the elderly man spat at the defendant or not. I was not there. However, the defendant had no right in the middle of the street, nor had a right to leave his car and walk up to the plaintiff. Wrong Wrong Wrong on all counts.
I definitely think the older guy did everything the defendant said. It’s why the plaintiff just couldn’t remember anything that was said. He knows he did. The defendant was wrong to punch the car but just because the plaintiffs are older doesn’t mean they can’t act badly.
Hey, Judge Milian. Is this old guy a relative of yours? Why is the plaintiff so believable and the defendant a liar? Because the plaintiff is old that makes him so honest in your eyes? Also accusing the defendant of being angry and the only one that is throwing a fit is Judge Milian. But, I applaud the defendent for being calm and being a grown-up in court. I cant say the same for that plaintiff, who I believe is lying and for Judge Milian's behavior. Judge, you acted like a baby in this case, and made a total fool of yourself. If your husband and kids aren't embarrassed by your little tantrum, they should be.
Who did you see on the defendant side?? Scary? Lol. Calm, cool, collected. And appalled the judge was believing the old boomers who could barely tell anyone what happened because they were LYING.
JM acting like all seniors are timid peaceful people. I’ve seen with my own eyes older people spitting and cursing at young adults over an argument and using all sorts of racial and derogatory words.
Exactly alot of old people are very disrespectful and feel as if they can say and do what they want but you're supposed to respect your elders
@@lashundavis156 She instantly wrote the defendant off over an age difference. This is biased from the beginning. Because I’m young I must be the aggressor? I’ve been the guy honking and had people older than me got out of their car cursed at me and drove off. JM is dead wrong on this
I agree.... old people are definitely the worst. They act like their age gives them the pass to say and do whatever. I think she was clouded by judgement because she herself is closer in age to the plaintiff than the defendant. And spitting at someone is definutely assault.
@@JazzyJeffRealTalk yea she is wrong and old people are definitely aggressive and he just got that look about him i saw all thru him
Agreed! I usually agree, but this time I can’t
In this case...i really feel that the defendant was telling the truth. There ARE old folks out there that behave just like he described. This case left me a bad taste....sad
I think the defendant exaggerated some things, but the plaintiff was not being completely honest either. He was instigating things too.
You’re joking…if you believe the defendants actions were warranted that’s pretty sad amazing
I’m 75 now. I worked customer service for 13 yrs when I was in my 40-50 yrs of age. Older people are the rudest customers.
How, on earth, is that relevant?
11:52 Defendant is a REALLY REALLY BAD LIAR and you guys are thick as hell.
What does that have to do with this case?
@@Jake-xu1tsExactly.
Why wasn't his wife there to testify if the old man did all that to her and her children 🤔
Cause she didn’t want to perjure herself. If that’s the way he acted he’s probably a wife beater
IKR?!
BINGO!!!
@@nonyabuiz3605 perjur
Exactly
I’ve worked in customer service for close to 20 years now.. Elderly people can be the absolute worst but when a superior comes out they turn into a sweet loving person ..don’t ever judge a book by it’s cover. They can be some of the most cruel vile name-calling customers that I ever encountered..
I believe that.
You are so right
Yes!, the judge didn't even give a chance at even believing the old man could have done anything like that at all... she went way too far.
She must live with the higher uos because. I see this happening on a daily basis of old people starting crap with younger people even after that telling younger people after harassing them to respect their elders lol.... lmao!
Alot of these old timers have lost their minds...
With all that said I freaking love judg Milian... it's just like 5% I would totally disagree with her and this is one of those times...
She even tried baiting him into getting angry which failed... she tried multiple times and didn't work..... I was like dude please don't get angry she trying to bait you into it....DON'T....LMAO!
So agree. Its as if there is an entitlement. I have seen this too often and it is embarressing. I am 68 years old and have never disrespected someone due to age, race or religion. Even if the individual is disrespectful to me I just leave them at where they are and take my dgnity with me. This plantiff gives me the wrong vibes.
Yes, and the plaintiff could barely string the story together. I believe the defendant on that.
Is it just me or does anyone else feel that the older people weren’t being completely honest?
Judge was blinded by age difference. If defendant had anger problem he would have blown up when Judge was yelling at him. He was polite throughout
@@Fyrn33 I’ve known enough men like him in my life to know this isn’t true. The judge has power over him and is an aggressive, blunt person who has no problem yelling at and putting people in their place. An old quiet couple in a car? Easy targets for that type of anger.
Although I do also think the older couple weren’t completely honest too. But men like him only target those who he perceives to be less powerful than he is so that he can feel powerful.
They weren't, the old man was a little to forgetful about the exchange of words.
They DEFINITELY weren’t being truthful. They were entirely too forgetful and basically said the same thing about the conversation as if they rehearsed it. The judge had to put the words in the lady’s mouth to get an idea of what was said. She also hit the nail on the head for this entire exchange without even realizing it. The older guy never felt like he was in danger. I wholeheartedly believe he spat in the younger guy’s face and was basically an a**hole throughout the exchange, including what he allegedly said about the wife and children. All this was backed up in his closing- he thought he could take the guy due to his time served. Her judgment was undoubtedly correct, but her assessment of the situation was wayyyy off on this one.
Agreed lol old people were 100% lying and judge ruled with them because their seniors and acted innocent, I’ve first handed seen how rude and disrespectful the older generation of people are, especially when it comes to the younger generations. Without a doubt that old ass man spit at that guy twice and called him names, I don’t believe he called his children names though but definitely his and his wife or just the man. Then his comment at the end with his dumb ass badge, lmfao some 50 year old military trainings not going to save you against someone who fights. Wasn’t worried about it until his entire face is fractured and broken, that generation has no respect and thinks their all high and mighty until their shown otherwise, as a retail manager I deal with hundreds of them a day. They were absolutely dishonest and disrespectful, thankfully he didn’t injure his old ass and nobody was harmed.
Only an old person would call children 'little bastards', because young people don't see it as a stigma to have children out of wedlock and probably don't even realise the true significance of the word 'bastard', also the old man knew that he could aggravate the young man by insulting his wife and children as well as spitting in his face, why else would the old man have rolled down his window?...
The name calling "bastard" does not implicate what it once did...It doesn't mean kids out of wedlock like it once did...It is now more like asshole....And can I just say that plaintiff's wife needs 2 quit smoking...She sounds like a gravel road...
You're generalizing.
11:52 Defendant is a REALLY REALLY BAD LIAR and you guys are thick as hell.
It wasn’t in the police report tho
Defendant is actually very well controlled and respectful. Plaintiff totally did it. JM is massively wrong and I’m glad all the comments see it too.
Now, he still needs to pay for it legally. But morally he was well justified. Getting spat on twice and all he did was hit a car instead of a person.
Applause to his self control.
Did you knew that psychopaths and narcissists act controlled and respectful?
This is a reason I leave it to you to reflect upon and develop further.
@@C3yl0 It doesn't matter. Plaintiff was the one who lost control and kept going on about his record and etc. All the comments see it too.
@Saphthings When it comes to the law, comments sections are meaningless. Any sociopath online can come comment and claim "poor defendant" , the long and short of it is that the defendant escalated the situation regardless and easily could have wound up shot and killed. Think on that before thinking what the majority write in comments is "correct" LOL.
I do believe there was truth to what the defendant said, especially after the plaintiff brought up at the end his combat badge. I believe the judge mistaken their age as some sweet old man, but honestly I kept thinking how sweet are you to stop in traffic not move then a crazy man walks up on you & you keep your window down and don't flinch??? I questioned if he was once that 34yr old tempered man but he's 66 now! He surely was not afraid!
The combat badge just means he wasn't going to operate from a place of fear. It's not evidence that he was hostile to the defendant.
Amen
I agree, I think the old man has a little temper too. The judge acted like cause he was 66 he wouldn't do that. I've met alot of older people who behave badly!
@@raiderrog6412 that is anecdotal evidence, just because you have met some doesnt mean the majority do.
She just assumed the old man did nothing and the young guy was the only aggresive person based on nothing at all
It doesnt matter who did anything.
The younger guy GOT out of the car & punched his car.
Why wouldnt he bring said Wife?
@@stephaniehowe0973 ... exactly ...
@@stephaniehowe0973 His wife wasn't involved and the older wife timidly lied. Spitting on someone can be a criminal offense. It may not seem like a battery in the sense of punching or kicking someone, but If you express your anger, frustration, or disgust with another person by spitting in their face (or anywhere on their person), that is precisely the criminal charge you could be facing. The old guy expressed the road rage.
@@donnah4713
As a Witness 🤦
I know what spitting counts as my Best Friend sat on the Grand Jury
Agreed ...
I think the judge got ahead of herself a little there. What the man said about his combat certification at the end most definitely says something about his attitude as well. I do believe the older gentleman is just as aggressive as the defendant. He just made sure to have good behavior in court 😂
Good thing you're not the judge
Yeah, he probably did spit when the defendant got in his face, but the defendant clearly started it and was the aggressor. Personally, I find it astounding that people who know - or at least should know - they're in the wrong are often the first to "double down" and makes matters even worse.
@@andrewryder3075 I think they both were equally disrespectful to each other. The defendant did start it for sure by beeping the horn and the plaintiff played into it by sitting his car right there to piss the guy off even more. Both of them had the opportunity to big the bigger person but none did.
@@juanitaschumacher6569 good thing ur not either
@@sarinalashawn Agreed. I certainly wasn't trying to imply that the plaintiff was blameless; most people faced with an angry driver angrily would just drive away if he/she started to approach. Still, the defendant has to have pretty poor self-control to ditch his family in the middle of the street just to berate another driver for intentionally delaying him.
I feel bad for the defendant, those old folks played their “ older people “ card pretty good, pretending to be so nice and innocent
you've got to be kidding! the younger guy was wrong at everything he did that day. Older guy was entitled and lacked good judgement and did not help deescalate the situation but the defendant was 100% the aggressor and deserved to lose the case
@@puzzliteBINGO! The defendant is an arrogant little bully who couldn’t tell the truth if his vulnerable family depended on it…left them directly IN HARM’S WAY in the car, in the middle of the road!! 😔
@@puzzlite😊
Im 64 and totally agree with you did you see the old git smirk at the end , bad call judge
You are VILE.
I believe the judge had a bad day on this episode, They both were trying to show who is the "big bad wolf in the den" and were both equally responsible for what happened that day. This was an episode I wish I hadn't seen. I'm very disappointed on how she reacted to one and not both
Except all of the defendants actions were aggressive from the beginning... yall defend anything... His story is the one that didn't make sense...
Judge is SO wrong!! There are a lot of old men, that would do exactly what the defendant is saying! She just hates aggressive annoying drivers, and took it out on him!
Exactly
@That Tunisian Crochet Life dear GOD getting out of a car and walking over to someone is not “putting their life in danger”. These inconsiderate boomers lied and got away with it.
@@ellipsis5345 They surely did by virtue of their age. The Judge bombed by believing the younger carried the rage. No No No! The older one expressed the worst rage with derogatory language and spitting. Was the young man guilty yes but not of road rage and the judge did not see that.
@That Tunisian Crochet Life the judge got one thing wrong, the plaintiff was lying when he recited his story. Watch it again if you want.
He said the defendant honked his horn twice. Once when he tried to get into the lane, and then a second time when the light just turned green. But somehow even with the light having just turned green, the plaintiff was still parked there giving the defendant enough time to get out of his car and walk over to him to yell at him and punch his car?
you can tell right here he's lying about something. IT doesn't add up, this story cannot be true. unless you add in like "the light was green but I decided to stay there just to piss him off" to start, which ruins the 'meek older man' image they're trying to sell here.
@@dragames Even the judge admitted to doing that exact same thing. "If they honk a second time I just sit there."
Spitting on another person isn't harassment, but actually assault with bodily fluid witch is even more worse. For anyone that has the balls to go ahead and spit on someone else is absolutely outrageous and they deserve every single thing that comes there way from the criminal charges and all the way to them getting there behind beaten to a pulp along with everything in between.
im usually on judge milian's side w these cases... but you're totally right. the fact that she thinks spitting on someone isn't assault bothers me.
She does say that it was father's day and the cop didn't want to do paperwork. I assume she knows. Could be wrong. Have family in law enforcement. They say it's more of an add on charge. Majority of the time it escalates to a physical fight. It's probably the most disrespectful thing you could do. With that said it's old dudes word against his. Also given his age during time of this taping he would have been drafted during Vietnam. That CIB he wears most likely gotten him spat on when he got home from a war he probably didn't volunteer for. Just got lucky and made it back home. I'll take the old man's word on this one. Dude looks like a hot head. But yeah totally agree that spitting on someone is the worst.
If the young isn’t leave his car and family he wouldn’t have gotten “spit” on should have never pulled out into trafffic to begin with
There is no excuse for assault. Spitting on someone is assault. The judge surely knows this. She is biased.
100% accuracy...
Not all elderly are sweet and innocent.
I find very few actually are under their surface. I disagree with the judge’s bias in believing the foggy vague testimony of the plaintiff over the calm factual testimony of the defendant.
The younger guy I haven't learned nothing I can tell until you go to jail or even worse and I don't want to see that happen to no one
We have nothing to lose.
I've encountered more mean and spiteful elderly ppl than I have mean and spiteful young ppl
11:52 Defendant is a REALLY REALLY BAD LIAR and you guys are thick as hell.
The judge keep asking his wife questions, did she thinks his wife is going to admit her husband did anything wrong.
she did say that her husband cursed at the defendant when he approached the car
Don't let the plaintiff and his wife fool you into thinking they're innocent. The way the word "pissed" came out of her mouth was way too easy. 😆 😂 Beside if he has such a bad temper why didn't he show any angry when the judge was dropping the hammer on his head over and over. A 66 yr old man can with combat behind him can get crazy too.
You shol' right A 🤣🤣
@That Tunisian Crochet Life how would you react if a court of law took the old boomers’ side just because they’re old? Their testimony was vague and foggy and they didn’t answer half the questions. I’d be appalled at what was happening before my eyes.
The old people definitely lied about what happened. She truly missed the signs of the old people lying.
right! i noticed too.
You missed the most important thing she said... Whether these geriatric folks did any of that this guy still damaged their car & that's all that matters in her ruling.
@@sandlotkrew8778 It's funny when people think they see something that the judge doesn't.
Wow an elder hater here, I feel sorry for your parent and grandparents for your disrespect of people you do not know personally. They did not lie.
I thought I was the only one!!! AND spitting is an assault not harassment. Just because they’re older doesn’t mean they act right. I didn’t like this episode, the judge herself looked like she was getting angry lol talk about anger management 🙄.
Old guy is lying , he fooled the judge
The young guy seem honest.
11:52 Defendant is a REALLY REALLY BAD LIAR and you guys are thick as hell.
The fact that the defendant stayed calm and cool while being screamed at tells me he doesn't have an anger issue. Now if someone spits at me, you better believe I'd do something.
The defendant could barely contain himself. He immediately used argumentative language when it was his turn to speak. After he realized the judge believe he wasn’t the victim in this whole thing, his posture changed. The way he had his arms straight and hands behind his back, His facial expressions -the strained, pursed lips and mostly his inability to just keep his mouth shut even after the judge told him to multiple times are all telltale signs that he has impulse control/aggression issues. Patient people don’t get out of their car to approach another car…. Passive-aggressive people will tirelessly blow their horn. The old man may not have been the saint he claimed, but this guy pushed his way into traffic “putting his family in harms way” as he puts it, then got out of his car and approached another car. The defendant has issues that he barely controlled in court.
Before someone touch me or spit I did not care but now with covid trust me he be beat to a pop
@@brittanymark9213 how was it barely controlled ? Y’all write paragraphs but it doesn’t prove anything
@@yung1717 oh no! Someone in the internet disagrees with me. How ever will I prove myself to someone who’s opinion I could give two shits less about…..
😆😆
If the defendant hadn't had an anger issue he wouldn't have got out of his car in the first place.
People need to control their anger as you never know who you will confront. There are so many people on the news getting killed over something like this. So unnecessary
Because people underestimate
Nah I definelty believe the old dude did that shit ...
Most mf definitely!!!
Yeah he punched his own car. And you have an IQ of 25.
I'm with the young guy with the wife and kids...people ABSOLUTELY DO come to a stop waaaaay back from the light, and often there will be three or four cars doing that, so the lane is backed up much further than it should be! My guess is, people start texting as they are approaching the redlight, and couldn't care less how their movements are affecting everybody around them
I work in customer service, I have way more crazy stories of how elderly customers were out of control vs a younger customer.
I work in Emergency and while old people can behave poorly, you are at greater risk of harm from young/middle age people. So while an older person might be grumpy and nasty, a I'm actually more afraid of what a young person would do
Everyone that yell’s or retaliates out of anger has anger issues yet she doesn’t like something someone says, she starts to yell at them like a lunatic . How does she expect to ppl to always stay calm , yet she can never control her emotions? Lmao! IRONIC
Yelling was not the issue. did you even listen to the case. People yell all the time. My parents yelled all the time. Judges yell. Police yell. That's a normal sign of anger. What is crazy is Illegally blocking traffic, getting out of your car to go confront someone and kicking their door in. Thats the abnormal part
For some reason, something is telling me that the plaintiffs are lying. I feel so bad about how this went.
100% agree!
Really? About what? The defendant’s story has more holes than swiss cheese! Not to mention he has some serious facking anger issues. For the love of God he has *three* SMALL children in the car!! If he had politely honked and the plaintiff was being a d1ck, he can just sit and wait. Not get out of his car to ‘politely ask’ the plaintiff to move. 🙄🙄🙄
I cant imagine what being married to him is like not to mention being his kids 😒
Me too 100 percent
@Christopher Moore the plaintiffs are lying about their passive meek exchange.
Their story didn't make sense. "He honked at me to move at the red light. He honked again when the light just turned green -- he had the time to still come out of his car to walk up to the side of my door to yell at me and then hit my car even though he had honked a second time because the light was green"
See where that doesn't make sense? Why were they still there if the light was green?
@@dragames Good point.
That gentleman works for the gov..has very unique combat experience i bet..he played the judge smooth.
I might be totally wrong but I feel the plaintiff and his wife are very good actors in looking so sweet in the court. Plus I feel JM had a clear bias from the start for the plaintiff. Just because two people don't "look like" people who could be nasty, does not mean they are not. I do believe the plaintiff spat in the face of the defendant, which is an assault.
The fact that the other guy's wife is NOT there in court speaks volumes!!! It's because she knows that her husband is a hothead and didn't want to lie to the judge. I believe the old folks. I don't believe the other guy.
Where is it in the police report though? That's definitely worthy of being put in there. So why wasn't it? xD They both turned in police reports...
He got out of his car. Why? He's the instigator. Period.
actually assault is bodily harm...spitting would be battery...and I do believe the Ps, Ds wife was absent and that speaks volumes
@@kycutecool5891 IT was in the police report though, but it wasn't conclusive because it was just heresay and not physical evidence (he wasn't going to leave spit on him if it did happen)
Your honor, spitting is assault, and you as a former da KNOW the LAW.
The old codger denied spitting
That's what I thought. Spitting is a crime especially since AIDS
You can't change the mind of someone who's convinced they're right.
11:52 Defendant is a REALLY REALLY BAD LIAR and you guys are thick as hell.
I spent 15 years working in nursing homes. It's quite possible he did spit in the man's face, been there 🤣. That said the younger fella started it and seemed like a smug, easy to anger shithead. Only a video of the incident would tell the whole truth.
You got that right!! 20 years working in nursing homes some of them want to cut your heart out with a spoon 😉 poor things. Some of them know what they're doing but most don't.
The plaintiff GUILTY!
Of what? x'D
That old man did call those kids names and he knows it. His wife is a liar.does that mean the other guy gets to punch his car, nope.
Peoples court game: take a shot every time the defendant says “Fair enough” 😂
I think it should also include the word, “So…”. Everyone would pass out drunk! The defendant seems like a real a**hole with serious anger issues. The plaintiff needs to face reality that at 66, that the “CI” pin on his lapel won’t resuscitate him once a crazed person shoots, stabs or stomps on him in a future road rage incident. Stay in the car, Pops, and don’t get out!
🤣🤣🤣
@@kathleenwyatt563 😂
Or, "okay". "okay, okay, fair enough". You can tell he's a little (or a lot) aggressive.
Another case where JM already has her mind made up before hearing the defendant.
11:52 Defendant is a REALLY REALLY BAD LIAR and you guys are thick as hell.
@ggyytgcvc The litigants file their case and the Judge reads their statements prior to them being on-camera. Getting out of a car in a Road Rage incident is never a good idea, the aggressor is always wrong in these cases unless he'd been shot & killed.
Bullshit
Also old guy probably instigated too. Why was he jus sitting there ?
Instigated..? I doubt it. -_- Judgement problem, yes. He definitely should have moved along and not stayed.
@@kycutecool5891 wish I could agree, but unless he was deaf or something and didn't hear anything, then of course he couldn't have moved his car up a bit. But when a person just sits there with this azzhole screaming for him to move up, and hitting the horn yelling at him to move up some, and this goes on an and on and on? At what point does "I don't understand why this guy is yelling at me to move up and beeping his horn at me to move", change to "fck that azzhole I'm not moving no got dam where". Just sayn. Human nature. Doesn't make sense? Unless the guy truly had zero space to move up some? If so, then no problem? If not, i just can't buy it. What explanation, besides he got friggin pissed cuz the azzhole kept blaring on the horn. It happens all the the time, people hate to get the horns blaring at them it pisses people off. Their reaction is to usually do the opposite of what that person with the horn wants. Watch, next time ur at a stop light and it turns green, if the person doesn't go right away, start blaring down ur horn and see what happens. Yell for them to go! Then come back here and be honest, cuz that person will might just stay at that light, to be sure u miss the green. I've seen it happen a lot. Not sure why. But it does. Can't see the guy smiling happy, loving all the horn play and yelling, and think nah I better not move up. It makes no sense to me. Jus my opinion.
@@kycutecool5891 that's instigation
I love how she goes from sweet to scary. It's terrifying 🤣.
JM is probably bipolar! I don't think I'll be watching her show anymore. Her unpredictable ups and downs are scary.
@@catalinalongoria2514 That is not how bipolar works hahahaha
Who’s scary??
@@wallacesteelersws the judge
Lol
She was extremely biased on this case!
Agreed. The boomers couldn’t answer half the questions and had almost no details about the situation. They lied and the judge didn’t go off the facts like she does in every other case. The judgement was not correct.
I agree 100%! Her mind was made up before the case even started….
No? She went with the police report, which reported none of what the defendant said true. She gave him a chance to prove what he was saying twice!
Who leaves their car in the road blocking traffic with their wife and kids in the car, that’s why Judge Milian is pissed.
I think spitting on or at someone is the most vile, disgusting, rude, nasty, no class thing someone can do. I have only had someone do it once, at middle school age...As a now adult, if anyone EVER spits at me, they will then be rendered spitless immediately...
Irony is the Judge just raged at him for having rage issues 🤣
I used to work in a restaurant and I can honestly say that I have dealt with more disrespectful elderly people than younger people. It is not out of the ordinary for someone elderly to be rude, disrespectful and nasty.
The defendant definitely should have paid for the damages he did to the car. However, her excuse for him being elderly is not an excuse.
I’m not sure how I feel about this case
I agree. I never disagree with the judge but I do here. This was handled horribly.
I served with quite a few recipients of the Combat Infantry Badge. Most haven’t been a-holes. The plaintiff instigated and probably did what the defendant claimed. Both are hotheads.
Judge M is also INCORRECT about the spitting, which is considered "assault with bodily fluids".
Nah
Spittle is incidental
Uncontrollable
Why is that your concern? Why isn't the guy getting out of his car BEFORE that your bigger concern? What if he'd been carrying a gun?
ohhhh noooo, spit!
Its actually simple assault and hardly ever charged. Another thing the law does in fact look at what a person does to cause an action. You come at me like defendant did, I probably wouldn't spit, but I would pull my knife or pepper spray.
Doesn't matter. He lost his temper. Punched a car. No amount of lyinng to try and make himself look good could have won him this case.
I thought it was assault/battery too...but maybe it's different where they live?
...I dnt have much trust in the system anyway 😕...
I actually believe they did spit and yell. I've seen some nasty old men.
The old guy could very easily have spat at him, and insulted him, but law wise he still can't punch the car. Sometimes you can just get fed up with people trying to bully you. I've been in a road rage situatin where a woman twice my size, stormed out of her car to point her finger in my face and rage. and yep...even though I'm this slight of a girl got out of the car and stood up to her! She backed off and went back to her car. Most bullies are too cowardice to follow through.
The defendant's story about the plaintiff calling the wife and kids names, and then spitting just isn't believable. Sounds like justification for his own road rage.
The judge's mind was made up after the first three minutes. Why would the plaintiff be wearing a CIB, a military badge, on civilian clothing? The plaintiff strikes me as one of those old farts who want to enforce laws on their own, like driving in the left lane at 49 mph in a 50 zone. I believe that there was plenty of room ahead of the plaintiff but he wanted to prove a point to the other younger driver..
Agreed. He looks and acts like an old curmudgeon.
And on top of all of that, no punching of a door would cost $1500 in repairs… what in the actual hell.
Whoa JM was having an off day. I can't believe the level of bias she shows on this Case
Bias.. For what? Kindly explain, lol...
@@kycutecool5891 If JM rules in a favor of a woman she is biased against men. If JM rules in favor of whites/hispanics/Asians over black people she is a racist. If she gives her opinion on specific issues, then she is either a right wing, loud mouthed B or a blatant feminist depending on what day it is. People are always calling this judge out for something no matter what she does. But those same people never miss an episode. 😂
I agree. She didn't even let the defendant speak and that's the 1st time I've ever seen her railroad someone like that. I don't know what it was.
My thing was why did the man stay there long enough for there to be an altercation? I mean if the light turned green then start driving, why hang around? That seems like a simple question that she would have asked because at that point the Plaintiff has his ego involved.
I really can't speak to whether the defendant was telling the truth or not because she cut him off so much that he never got a chance to speak and that's the 1st and only time that I've been able to say that.
I agree completely! This was absolutely insane on her part.
She was ridiculous in this case, I felt very frustrated at her bias and behavior
Tbh I feel like the plaintiff did instigate and spit at him only because old people think that their age makes them look fragile and innocent and can do no wrong
wrong
Correct.
Everyone saying they’re on the defendant’s side is delusional. This guy is so aggressive he can’t even let the judge finish a sentence without getting hyped up.
If he can’t control himself in court, he absolutely didn’t control himself on the road
I feel like the case was over as soon as JM saw the plaintiff and defendant. I don’t know what happened but I do know that because of the both sides ages and looks she believed one over the other. The whole thing made me so angry with JM. They both were judged right for the beginning and court should never be held like that.
If the defendant really had anger issues, he wouldn’t be as calm as he was when he was getting accused of lying and getting yelled at by JM.
Sure he would. He only picks on weaker people like this older plaintiff couple.
Never get out of your car. If someone approaches you, keep the window up and drive away. Be courteous.
She’s talking about anger management…look at her! She got it all wrong!
No.
Again. Righteous anger. Most people are reasonable despite how the internet makes it seem. He behaved terribly. Raged at someone, punched their car. Now he tried to lie to make himself look good. How could you not tell that he was making everything up..? Dang...
I think he totally lied about the plaintiff calling his kids and wife out their name, but do believe it's possible that the old guy spit on him. But defendant was aggressor as he got out the car
I believe the defendant. I’ve had old people yell at me and treat me like complete crap for absolutely no reason other than their completely miserable lives
I 100% don’t think that old man is innocent. 66 year old men are more angry and aggressive driving and with poor retail workers that I think she was dead wrong. I know the other dude was not innocent either but I know that old man did not just sit in his car like Dalai Lama.
dalai lama, haha
The defendant’s wife didn’t show up to collaborate his fabricated testimony. That speaks volumes!
THAT OLD MAN IS NOT AS INNOCENT AS HE LOKS HE REALLY PUT ONE OVER ON THE JUDGE HE DID SPIT ON THE GUY
No, I highly doubt he did, Ma'am. I really do. There is no statement from police. It was a fabrication by the defendant. And even if he did. Who got out to confront the other driver? Who punched the car? It sure as heck wasn't the plaintiff!
The defendant really put one over you, it seems.
@@kycutecool5891 roll up the window
She automatically took the old peoples side as of old people can’t be aggressive or abusive, I don’t doubt the dependants account
That’s what the boomers do. I totally believe the old man did everything.
I’m a a woman boomer and I agree with you. I don’t do this, but every man my age that I know curses and rages in traffic. I think the judge went off the wrong direction on this one.
same!
Agreed. This is the only time so far I totally disagree with the judge. The plaintiffs couldn’t answer half the questions and left so many blanks. Any other litigant would have lost over that alone. So disappointed these rude self-important boomers got away with this.
@@ellipsis5345 watch the case again, notice the plaintiff's story is impossible. "He honked the horn once, then when the light turned green honked his horn again" ... "THEN he got out of his car and walked up to my side and yelled at me and then hit my car" while the light was green? You mean old man was just sitting there not moving at a green light?
Irony is the judge was raging at him about having rage issues 🤣
".... pick the Jaguar. Live a little... "
This judge is so attractive
The defendent doesn't seem to understand that sticks and stones can break his bones but words can never physically hurt him. Foolish prideful man set a bad example for his wife and kids. Always behave in the Fruit of the Spirit for the sake of ourselves and society.
Spitting on me gets your a$$ whooped.
actually words can hurt someone... especially if those words are racist. totally different topic from this case, but you're going into a whole other pond of nope. and it's usually 99% white people that use that phrase thinking they can get away w anything they say to poc.
@@cynicalbanter words do not "physically hurt" as I stated. I agree as you stated that words can emotionally hurt, especially when racist
Nah if you can use your words and spit venom you can get hit
This is why you don't take your case to these TV shows. The "judge" clearly went off assumptions rather than discuss the facts of the case. She immediately had bias once she heard the old man say the guy beeped his horn.
Get a dash cam people. I’ve had so many people stop road raging as soon as they saw my cam. The defendant is a total liar. He’s the irrational road rager and made everything up to justify his insane actions.
So this older Man heard absolutely nothing the judge said. He's talking about a war medal he got 100years ago Sir! This is a different world be safe and drive Off! Smh
Non verbal communication never lies. When the old man said he didn't call the children bastards, his head nodded yes. I believe he did curse at the defendant's family. Old people can be extremely vindictive just for the hell of it. Not saying that what the defendant did was wrong- it was definitely dumb smhhhhh- but I do believe he was provoked by the guy, who outback just wanted to feel 25 years younger for a second and showboat in front of his wife for a second. I kinda feel bad for the defendant.... even though he was definitely dumb. I think he was just too excited to get back to the grandparents' house to get the celebrations going. Definitely should practice some more patience.... but I think the plaintiff really did do it.
Agree completely.
The old guy probably did hurt people in the war
I like how ppl have two totally different details to the same story.
I think that both the plaintiff and defendant weren’t telling the truth. Just because the plaintiff is in his 60’s doesn’t mean he was afraid. Why didn’t he drive off when the light turned green? Why would he stay there and engage with a crazy man? The defendant’s attitude with the judge didn’t help him in this case. I like judge Milan but she took the plaintiffs side way too quick. His story didn’t make sense either. Both him and his wife can’t “remember” what the defendant was screaming at them. I don’t believe that at all.
Oh come on, such elder hate you have. Sad for your parents and grandparents that raised to respect elders, then you talk disrespect. Shame on you.
@@trekgirl65 I hate bitter coots
Caiazza is a little man-child with such rage he left his family IN THE CAR IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD with oncoming traffic!!! 😮
He’s a true crime podcast waiting to happen…
Spitting on someone is definitely assault. If you throw water on someone its fine but anything else is assault... I think she just got hung up on the kids part and father's day and teaching the "crazy" guy a lesson. Probably why she started talking even faster so no one would catch that lol
He
got
out
of
his
car.
That's not the point though. He charged to the plaintiff's car, damaged it. Whether the plaintiff spit (which is quite clearly a fabrication since there's nothing on it directly from the police) or not does not matter. He lost his cool. He damaged the car. He pays.
@@kycutecool5891 I'm not negating that, I'm just saying the plaintiff should've been held accountable for what he did. She said herself, as a former prosecuter she knows that they PO just didn't want to do the paperwork. If the PO acknowledged the assault, that would be even more paperwork. The crazy guy is at fault but I feel like that old guy is playing up the old card. Even the Judge said "does he look like he would do that?" and the old man went with it
The Plaintiff never spit on dude. Stop it. This was her HIGHNESS at one of her best. I love when she tells an idiot off..
@@marycollins5823 Fair enough. If he did, I agree. But I really don't believe the spitting happened. Otherwise it would have appeared clearly in the police report. Both turned the same thing in. The officer did not acknowledge that such a thing occurred.
Whether the old person did actually do what the guy said, in the end he was still the aggressor and in the wrong traffic wise as well
Truth!
You guys are missing her point
You don't act like an animal with your wife and kids in tow
That's in his kids heads how to handle conflict
We have enough hot heads these days, over 99.99% of the time, nothing
YES EXACTLY OMG THANK YOU
People going on and on about bias and spitting and the elderly folk lying
In the end.. Who got out of his car to yell at someone? Who punched the car? Wasn't the plaintiff!
@@kycutecool5891 Defendant seems to be the liar. His story is so out there and sounds like something a kid makes up to cover their ass.
@@ButtonsCasey YEP YEP
Judge Millian to old guy: "heh heh I'm a dick in traffic sometimes."
Judge Millian to young guy: "HOW DARE YOU BE A DICK IN TRAFFIC ON FATHER'S DAY! THAT MUST MEAN YOU HAVE ANGER ISSUES!"
@That Tunisian Crochet Life old man got out too, yet her take for that isn’t “Omg you’re a psycho! You have anger problems! Reee 😡 “ it’s “oh you silly old geezer, you’re so cute and your judgment is so silly Willy you widdle guy! So cute! 🥰 “
She was being a total buffoon in this case. The defendant was wrong, and so was the plaintiff. Suddenly she’s not talking about macho behavior back and forth when that’s exactly what this is.
About a year ago I cut off this Mexican dude, I tried to apologise to him but he wouldn't have it, so he decided to break my driver side window with a pair of pliers, and try to drag me out of the car. What he didn't realize is that my laborer was a lot bigger and stronger than him. So in the next 3 minutes my laborer just beat the living tar out of this guy on the side of the road. Then the cops showed up and arrested him for reckless driving, assault and battery, road rage, DUI, possession of methamphetamine, possession of paraphernalia...I guess he proved his point.
The fact that the plaintiff was there long enough to engage with the defendant tells me that some parts of that story were🤔🤷🏽♀️ true.
Plaintiff instigated it by intentionally not letting the guy in. The defendant was a gracious loser.
I don’t like the assumption that all old people are nice, they’re literally THE WORST
With the way the defendant conducts himself in court. I believe the Plaintiff was wrong. The judge clearly had a favorite from the go
I disagree. I think the defendant was barely containing himself. His posture, with his arms tensely at his sides,his face tightened and his pursed lips. And the fact that even after the judge told him to be quiet multiple times, he could barely stop himself from speaking. The mere fact that he did something stupid, pushed his way out into traffic and then felt entitled enough to think the other driver had to get out of his way? He even admits to “putting his family in harms way.” THEN he gets out of his car to approach the other car… people who do that aren’t doing it to be polite about their request. That defendant has self control issues.
the way he says 'Ok' ... you can feel the rage underneath...
Well yeah. He’s being called a liar while he’s obviously telling the truth.
I think that plaintiff absolutely did those things. Especially the after interview and he brought up CIP.
I see a lot of comments saying I don't believe the old ppl... & that's fine. These two men can yell & cuss at each other all they want... But neither of them have the right to put their hands on each other or each other's property... & that's what her ruling comes down to... This case isn't about morality it's about damages.
Well said!
WHAT? The judge is just presuming without any evidence whatsoever, that the old man is a polite, kind old man, and that the young man is rude and aggressive, but there are many old men that would say exactly what the defendant claims he said, and for the young defendant to make up a sentence that only an old man would most definitely say 'little bastards' is not something a young person would say, nor know to make up. And I totally believe that the old man spat in his face and of course the plaintiff's wife is going to back him up, why wouldn't she, she is as vile as him. And the old man even said he wasn't afraid, in fact he even got out of his car to get the license plate number. The judge is so biased and so wrong about the young defendant, his comportment throughout her reprimand shows me he has total self control...
The weirdest thing about the comments is all the people claiming they see some kind of rage behind the defendant’s eyes. Lmao. Seeing what you want to see. This man was calm, collected, and recounted what happened.
Meanwhile The arrogant, disrespectful boomers can’t answer half the judge’s questions and gave a foggy testimony with very few details. Lots of shrugged shoulders and “I don’t know”‘s.
Flexing that little badge on his outfit at the end PROVED how self-important, self-absorbed, and arrogant the plaintiff was and he DEFINITELY did all the things the defendant claimed.
I thought the same with the plaintiffs lack of detail in their testimony
Some people thinks that's hidden danger anger. Their problem.
Even IF that was all true.....the defendant didn't have the space to make the turn in the first place so it's LITERALLY ALL his fault. If you can't safely make a turn....you HAVE to WAIT
These old folks strike me as liars. Judge was inappropriately harsh to the defendant though he should have hauled his family in to back his story and things may have gone different.
I think that old man has a serious pride problem. I wouldn't be surprised if he did some of the stuff he's accused of.
Defendant claims to be 34 and looks about 50. His hair is so THIN.
The young dude didn't get much of a word in edgewise. The judge was completely bias. Old people can be arrogant and grumpy and he probably did get pissed for getting honked at. It bugged me at the end when the old codger thought he was superior and special because he had an army badge. I'm in my later 50's and I don't shove my USMC vet status into people faces.
We didn't even see the damage to the car..... Yes he's wrong for punching the guy's car... But $1400 in damages?
I was waiting for this comment. She didn't even make him prove his damages. I think JM was showing hr temper issues/biases on this one.
@@DaniWoodson1 totally agreed......
The old guy and his wife are lying. I'll bet he did all the things the defendant says he did. As soon as he said he was trained in combat I knew he had intense aggression.
Silly comment
Even just showing it off was irrelevant. Just more proof that he’s one of the bad boomers that I completely believe did the things the defendant claimed.
@@ellipsis5345 that and spouses testimonies should be ignored. The chance that anyone would lie for their SO is nearly 100%
Everyone’s all like “oh the old people played privilege” it doesn’t matter the dude still was the one who caused the issue.
J.M. needs anger management on this one gezz .. and I tend to belive the Defendant because you can exit the vehicle and ask someone to do a favor/help out w/o being angry
She needs anger management period.
You don’t leave your vehicle in the middle of the road with 3 kids and your wife in the car @!
I dont know if the elderly man spat at the defendant or not. I was not there. However, the defendant had no right in the middle of the street, nor had a right to leave his car and walk up to the plaintiff. Wrong Wrong Wrong on all counts.
and...he probably calls his wife and kids those names @ home when he is mad.
I definitely think the older guy did everything the defendant said. It’s why the plaintiff just couldn’t remember anything that was said. He knows he did. The defendant was wrong to punch the car but just because the plaintiffs are older doesn’t mean they can’t act badly.
Every 66 isn’t scary! I know 66 years olds who, unfortunately, would go toe to toe anyone!
I think the old man was JUST AS MUCH A JERK as the young guy! Neither of them should have gotten anything!
Hey, Judge Milian. Is this old guy a relative of yours? Why is the plaintiff so believable and the defendant a liar? Because the plaintiff is old that makes him so honest in your eyes? Also accusing the defendant of being angry and the only one that is throwing a fit is Judge Milian. But, I applaud the defendent for being calm and being a grown-up in court. I cant say the same for that plaintiff, who I believe is lying and for Judge Milian's behavior. Judge, you acted like a baby in this case, and made a total fool of yourself. If your husband and kids aren't embarrassed by your little tantrum, they should be.
Unreal people are blaming the plaintiff. The defendant is scary. Makes me wonder what he does when he's mad at his wife and kids.
True. It's not hard to imagine the defendant yelling, breaking, and hurling stuff at home to his kids and wife.
I think that's why she was not there
Who did you see on the defendant side?? Scary? Lol. Calm, cool, collected. And appalled the judge was believing the old boomers who could barely tell anyone what happened because they were LYING.
The old man is VERY ACTIVE PASSIVE! JM was biased on this one.