It enables the grid to run on ultra cheap renewable energy and removes highly costly peak Gas plants that run for mere minutes a day at exorbitant expense
@@denisburgess2966 In what way? I have solar and thermal solar My hot water is free 75% of the time and I top the tank up overnight with a special overnight rate which is the same as my Feed in Tariff during the day for excess solar. Capital repayment cost is 8 years due to the energy crisis so just 4 years to go. And that's all net zero is money up front and various ways to store and time-shift energy usage to maximise usage at off peak and minimise cost at On Peak at Grid scale.
Government borrows money for capital projects and said projects return higher GDP which = increased taxes and net zero isn't nonsense it allows you to connect ultra cheap renewable energy in a reliable way onto the grid
@@SlowhandGreg in that case, why are we being charged the highest electricity bills we've ever had? Either it doesn't work or the Gov is keeping huge profits!
@@Clare0116 Spot-on Clare - In the UK, we're unfortunately experiencing life as one of the world's most expensive energy countries. While we may not be in the top five most expensive countries out of 194 countries, we're sitting at the 188th most expensive. The price of a kilowatt in the UK is £0.39, almost double the European average of £0.23. This cost will only increase under Labour's Net Zero policies - you think it is bad now, just wait a couple of years...
If people were shown how toxic, destructive and exploitative 'green ' technologies are. The toxic lithium and cobalt mining, child labour in the Congo, slave labour of the Uighurs in China. It's all an environmental nightmare. What is green about any of this! And for what? The UK only produces 1% of global emissions. Mean time carbondioxide (CO2) is vital for photosynthesis, plants can't grow without it. Look up "NASA Greening" it shows from satellite pictures the earth has greener massively in the last two decades 70% due to CO2.
Net zero is an absolute con. Even the IPCC report isn't hysterical. I went to a climate fair and asked 4 climate questions to people trying to sell me green stuff. none knew the answer. Couldn't believe it. Eg How much CO2 in the atmosphere? 0.04pc What's the minimum amount of items as byproduct from oil? Minimum 6,500. Including medication, mobile phones, vegan shoes, houses. Hilarious
@SlowhandGreg gas £55mwh. Offshore new price £101 mwh. Sar @ £76. Explain how that makes things cheaper. Wind @33% efficient solar @10% from near zero in winter to 25% I summer Oh how to make it cheaper add £ 60 quid green tax to gas This of course pushed up the price as well
@@alexedwards6509 I worked a good few years ago for National Power so understand how the grid works. And You can easily find the forward contract price for Generating installations renewables come out as the cheapest by a considerable margin. The issue is capital investment in a renewable grid, sticking with gas will cost double long term and that's before the savings from not having Gas Peak plant on idle for just in case and Time shifting using smart tech.
@@tonyjefferson3502 Net zero is a big part of the reason companies can't train and employ skilled British labour, The costs the uniparty have loaded on to businesses and public services is the reason the country is going bust, £3trillion of national debt, bankrupt councils so where is the benefit of green energy, new tech and multiculturalism.
68 coal fired power stations in Russia 600 in India 3092 in China and many more through out the world And our nutjobs in our parliament tell us we must have none
Yep get 2 bags with thermometers in them one bag C02 from welding kit or exhaust one bag of air put them on ground on a sunny day test it ALL A LIE I did this 15 years ago and know it everytime I so some idiot on TV talk about NET - ZERO I scram at the TV.
Trying to achieve net zero or fighting climate change, as a small island nation, is like using resources you don't have yet to treat a bee sting on your ankle while vipers are biting your face! VOTE REFORM UK and end this madness.
They take a temperature in the middle of summer in the middle of an airport, and then tell us it is the hottest day ever, when they have to cheat to get it you know it's a con.
8 out of 10 weather stations in UK are inside urban heat islands, giving out corrupted higher average temperature data. They know it's a con, but also know where their bread is buttered.
Only if we allow it. As a great man recently said. 'The age of self loathing is over. The age of heroism must now begin' We must stand up. Our children are depending on us. Lets grow some ffs
That secret Labour Party costing came from myself. The Royal Society said full Net Zero would cost £410 billion. But the true cost is £4,300 billion. See my costings in my other posting. I sent these costings to all MPs. R
The Tories wasted 400 Billion on pointless measures during the pandemic, the Labour Party will finish us off financially with Net Zero to such an extent that people will not believe how horrible and poor our lives will become.
Fear Fear Fear they have to pedal it for the people that are still fast asleep It’s got to stop and the only one that’s telling the truth is Reform so if you want to continue being poorer vote Conservative or vote Labour or use your brain and Vote Reform
Future generations will likely look back in jaw-dropping amasement at how the people of the early 21st Century threw the world towards bankruptcy and poverty on the basis of some highly questionable extrapolations of some carefully chosen datasets. ‘The climate has been happily changing for 4.6 billion years without our interventions. Indeed, we've only been here for 1.8 million years. We will need to adapt to a changing climate - as indeed we have over the years. We are still emerging from the Little Ice Age (1400 to 1850) and temperatures - if they continue on their current trajectory - will still be slightly cooler than the Medieval Period, the Roman Period and the Minoan Period in a 100 years time. The role of man-made carbon dioxide in climate change is questionable. Indeed, there is a lot of valid research showing that CO2 increases FOLLOW increases in temperature. This is logical as warmer temperatures encourage fauna and flora to flourish. The amount of green plant life on the planet has actually increased these past hundred years. Food production is up. Life expectancy is up. Reality, facts, reason and informed debate seem to have no part to play in this obsession with driving Britain towards Year Zero.’ CO2 is plant food - and therefore food for humanity and all animals. C02 is basis of all life on Earth. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide. I stand to be corrected, but am given to understand that academic research and papers not aligned with the fanatical & doom-laden narrative, do not get published or funding.
I have just had the AirCon on in my office this week. First time this year. Last year it was on from early April to October. But this year, despite having the heating on in the office in early May, was the hottest on record? They are lying through their teeth
What difference will UK NetZero make to global temperature ?… (numbers from Google) A … UK emissions per year = 400 million tons . B … CO2 required to increase global temperature by one degree C = 1 million million tons Divide A by B to get the reduction in global temperature if UK achieved Net Zero. Answer; 0.0004 degrees Centigrade per year. That’s four ten-thousandths of one degree C per year … Now you can decide if it's worth it.
Around 80% of the MET Office temperature stations are class 4 or 5, quality. Class 4 can record temperatures as much as 2C above, and class 5 up to 5C above. In other words they are junk status.
Yes net zero will dominate the labour govmt, That means a major disaster. TOtally destructive, impossible. Nightmare. £trillions for the renewable grid, and still nothing to allow us to cnbancel fossil fuels cand 80% of our energy. Hit and miss needs backup which means. Our elec will cost treble our current Costs.
Can't solve mass immigration, knife crime, drug deaths, crumbling roads, but yes, we can change the climate of an entire planet, but we need to make the least well off even poorer to do it. Yeh, I'll vote for that then.
When Starmer and his mates remove the 18% of carbon, which makes up their worthless bodies. Then, I will listen to Starmer 's opinions, if he is still able to think.
It’s all about reducing every single thing we love- driving, flying, travelling, eating good organic local seasonal foodstuffs- to be replaced with hunger games 15 min cities ULEZ and worse… all driven by WEFMINSTER & The UN snd co
Net Zero is prohibitively costly, impractical and totally unnecessary. Arrhenius who described the greenhouse effect in the late nineteenth century opined that the carbon dioxide emissions from human activity would have the beneficial effects of increased agricultural yields and postponement of the next glacial maximum. You can add reduced winter heating costs and fewer deaths from hypothermia. This is especially so in cold areas such as the UK. Net Zero is economically destructive delusional insanity and needs to be urgently abandoned . The massive misappropriation of taxpayers money and resources into uneconomical and unreliable renewable energy projects needs to be stopped. We should simply use the most economical energy, transportation and agricultural resources available.
Evertime we build something there is a carbon footprint. Scrapping stuff for new stuff with questionable technologies is bonkers. Often the measures in Net Zero are actually negative
We know where the majority of emissions come from. Some of the denier arguments like "even your plastics require fossil fuels" completely ignores the fact that that account for 0.03% of the CO2 issue. Of course the resulting plastics have their own issues. I don't think I've ever heard a single argument that would result in more CO2. Why possible argument is there that you have heard?
They write policy's, to make money for There private Company Bum Chums, Back Hand payments, place on the directors board when you leave the house of lords with cushty salary. This is what Politics is in GB.
I know this is not a popular view but i do think there is a connection between women being over represented in senior positions in organisations and this irrational focus on bogus threats and then totally bizarre and pointless responses; such as net zero.
There's an added cost that I doubt is ever included: maintenance and replacement of solar panels and wind mills. Yesterday was hot, said by someone who used to live in tropical Durban, South Africa. But I did miss ceiling fans yesterday. I'm out of the habit of finding the time to slip under a lukewarm/cold shower twice a day.
If the UK was to go completely wind based, it would take the next 20+ years to build the farms. By the time they finished, the first batch of turbines would need replacing, immediately followed by the second and then the third........
The earth circles the sun in an elliptical path. Takes a long time but eventually we go into an ice age. In-between weather varies. Cold weather will kill us way before heat will.
It is a 52,000 year cycle and has 4 sub cycles, 12,000 years. That defines ice ages but each 12,000 the ice age occurs in different sectors of the planet.
"Net Zero" is what you get when stupidity collides with unaccountably.
There is accountability. It's a crime named misconduct in public office and carries a life sentence.
It enables the grid to run on ultra cheap renewable energy and removes highly costly peak Gas plants that run for mere minutes a day at exorbitant expense
@SlowhandGreg what a load of rubbish.
@@SlowhandGreg🤡🤡🤡
@@denisburgess2966 In what way?
I have solar and thermal solar
My hot water is free 75% of the time and I top the tank up overnight with a special overnight rate which is the same as my Feed in Tariff during the day for excess solar.
Capital repayment cost is 8 years due to the energy crisis so just 4 years to go.
And that's all net zero is money up front and various ways to store and time-shift energy usage to maximise usage at off peak and minimise cost at On Peak at Grid scale.
Net Zero is about one thing. And that is lining the pockets of a few already wealthy people 😢
Who is going to suffer the brunt of this net zero nonsense.
Oh that would be the poorest in the country.
Look at Sri Lanka...😢
Highest ESG score in the world, total chaos and people starving.
Government borrows money for capital projects and said projects return higher GDP which = increased taxes and net zero isn't nonsense it allows you to connect ultra cheap renewable energy in a reliable way onto the grid
"You will own nothing and be happy" - the WEF.
@@SlowhandGreg in that case, why are we being charged the highest electricity bills we've ever had? Either it doesn't work or the Gov is keeping huge profits!
@@Clare0116 Spot-on Clare - In the UK, we're unfortunately experiencing life as one of the world's most expensive energy countries. While we may not be in the top five most expensive countries out of 194 countries, we're sitting at the 188th most expensive. The price of a kilowatt in the UK is £0.39, almost double the European average of £0.23. This cost will only increase under Labour's Net Zero policies - you think it is bad now, just wait a couple of years...
Vote REFORM for PEACE, STABILITY , HOPE and COMMON SENSE
The real tragedy of NetZero is that all the money comes out of the jar marked ‘environment’.
If people were shown how toxic, destructive and exploitative 'green ' technologies are. The toxic lithium and cobalt mining, child labour in the Congo, slave labour of the Uighurs in China. It's all an environmental nightmare. What is green about any of this! And for what? The UK only produces 1% of global emissions. Mean time carbondioxide (CO2) is vital for photosynthesis, plants can't grow without it. Look up "NASA Greening" it shows from satellite pictures the earth has greener massively in the last two decades 70% due to CO2.
Vote REFORM UK, vote to scrap Net Zero.
I want the old weather forecast when it was happy and sunny, not mass destruction
REFORM,REFORM, REFORM COME ON NIGEL, ALL BACKING YOU AND BOYS.100%.!!!!!
1940s: put that bloody light out! ; have a cup of tea and carry on.
My central heating was on all May as well. Also it's been on for most of this month.
Net zero is an absolute con.
Even the IPCC report isn't hysterical.
I went to a climate fair and asked 4 climate questions to people trying to sell me green stuff. none knew the answer. Couldn't believe it.
Eg
How much CO2 in the atmosphere?
0.04pc
What's the minimum amount of items as byproduct from oil?
Minimum 6,500.
Including medication, mobile phones, vegan shoes, houses.
Hilarious
Readings taken at weather centres on airport tarmac and city town centres
El scorchio !!!
Thats just GOD - taking the proverbial ¿¡¡😂❤😅
You must all now see the BS ? You don’t ? No help for you I’m afraid enjoy your heat pump 😂😂
Vote Reform to get our country and teach the Tories and Labour a lesson they will never forget
AND show the WEF globalists they don't rule US!
net zero will end the new labour government
It facilitates the advent of cheaper electric it's already started to drive a manufacturing boom in the US
@SlowhandGreg gas £55mwh. Offshore new price £101 mwh. Sar @ £76.
Explain how that makes things cheaper.
Wind @33% efficient solar @10% from near zero in winter to 25% I summer
Oh how to make it cheaper add £ 60 quid green tax to gas
This of course pushed up the price as well
@@alexedwards6509 I worked a good few years ago for National Power so understand how the grid works.
And
You can easily find the forward contract price for Generating installations renewables come out as the cheapest by a considerable margin.
The issue is capital investment in a renewable grid, sticking with gas will cost double long term and that's before the savings from not having Gas Peak plant on idle for just in case and Time shifting using smart tech.
@@SlowhandGreg The Labour Party is ruled by the WEF, who make everything expensive, especially for the peasants!
@@tonyjefferson3502 Net zero is a big part of the reason companies can't train and employ skilled British labour, The costs the uniparty have loaded on to businesses and public services is the reason the country is going bust, £3trillion of national debt, bankrupt councils so where is the benefit of green energy, new tech and multiculturalism.
I saw the results of Labour's Climate Change Act 2008. All heavy industry left the UK by 2012, as the Tories continued it.
Voting for Reform.
And continued poverty will define Britain
That is the Marxist way...
Vote Reform party
68 coal fired power stations in Russia
600 in India
3092 in China and many more through out the world
And our nutjobs in our parliament tell us we must have none
Correct, enough said, just vote Reform.
and they are building more
This is a big lie
Yep get 2 bags with thermometers in them one bag C02 from welding kit or exhaust one bag of air put them on ground on a sunny day test it ALL A LIE I did this 15 years ago and know it everytime I so some idiot on TV talk about NET - ZERO I scram at the TV.
Net Zero stupid will end when the lights go out.
The biggest waste of money ever seen on this planet.
Net zero is a load of bull ship
Vote Reform.
Trying to achieve net zero or fighting climate change, as a small island nation, is like using resources you don't have yet to treat a bee sting on your ankle while vipers are biting your face! VOTE REFORM UK and end this madness.
I don't consent and won't comply , simple as that .
Sorry but they don’t seem to care whether you consent and they will force you to comply.
@@Aria-wl2ve So we vote the WEF Traitors OUT of Government!
We need to vote for reform UK.
:)
They take a temperature in the middle of summer in the middle of an airport, and then tell us it is the hottest day ever, when they have to cheat to get it you know it's a con.
8 out of 10 weather stations in UK are inside urban heat islands, giving out corrupted higher average temperature data.
They know it's a con, but also know where their bread is buttered.
And they claim May was the hottest on record because the 'night time temperatures were higher'. Yeah, because of the constant bloody cloud cover!
I was in the UK throughout May. It was one of the coldest and wettest in years.
I live in Singapore during the early 70's and the temperatures were alway 100 degrees Fahrenheit plus so it is still the same temperature today
Yeah, the so called 'climate crisis ' is only happening in the UK the rest of the world is business as usual.
He will be the final nail in Britains coffin
Only if we allow it. As a great man recently said. 'The age of self loathing is over. The age of heroism must now begin'
We must stand up. Our children are depending on us. Lets grow some ffs
On my weather app the next 10 days temperatures will be between 17/20 degrees 😮 global boiling 🥵🙄
What is certain, taxes will soar during the labour premiership and migration will be in its millions.
Again, WE NEED THE BLOODY CO2!!
WEF is your answer.
It's insane that we need to be told to drink more in hot water. May the hottest month? Not according to my gas bill.
Zero seats
May was the hottest month, but only because the nighttime temperatures didn't drop as far as previous years.
Sooo there was cloud cover..
Many of us were so cold we put heating back on, even in June!
I'm glad someone in the news is bringing up the fact that in my (45 years) lifetime we have clearly had warmer Mays than that one...!!!
Scrap net zero.. vote reform 🇬🇧
Same script world wide
Trillion dollar business
The only thing we have to look forward to is Labour making an arse of it. God help us!
Buckley is another person who is part of the problem.
When something doesn't make sense, follow the money.
That secret Labour Party costing came from myself.
The Royal Society said full Net Zero would cost £410 billion.
But the true cost is £4,300 billion.
See my costings in my other posting.
I sent these costings to all MPs.
R
Really? WOW! I hope you sent Nigel Farage a copy?
If a government runs it billions will turn in trillions
The Tories wasted 400 Billion on pointless measures during the pandemic, the Labour Party will finish us off financially with Net Zero to such an extent that people will not believe how horrible and poor our lives will become.
Vote Reform Don't forget black pen or biro not a pencil on Thursday
Fear Fear Fear they have to pedal it for the people that are still fast asleep
It’s got to stop and the only one that’s telling the truth is Reform so if you want to continue being poorer vote Conservative or vote Labour or use your brain and Vote Reform
Vote reform and forget this BS
If the Labour Party do become the next government, I predict one of the shortest political honeymoons in living memory.
We can control the weather by raising taxes 😂😂😂😂
A house near me has solar panels and they are covered with bird sh1t. They aren't going to be generating much electric.
They must be guano magnets 😂
it's slightly hot for 2 days here , cooler today, all the warnings on msm "risk of death " etc. utter nonsense .
Get Mr Ed Miliband in front of a microphone…!
Future generations will likely look back in jaw-dropping amasement at how the people of the early 21st Century threw the world towards bankruptcy and poverty on the basis of some highly questionable extrapolations of some carefully chosen datasets.
‘The climate has been happily changing for 4.6 billion years without our interventions. Indeed, we've only been here for 1.8 million years. We will need to adapt to a changing climate - as indeed we have over the years.
We are still emerging from the Little Ice Age (1400 to 1850) and temperatures - if they continue on their current trajectory - will still be slightly cooler than the Medieval Period, the Roman Period and the Minoan Period in a 100 years time.
The role of man-made carbon dioxide in climate change is questionable. Indeed, there is a lot of valid research showing that CO2 increases FOLLOW increases in temperature. This is logical as warmer temperatures encourage fauna and flora to flourish.
The amount of green plant life on the planet has actually increased these past hundred years. Food production is up. Life expectancy is up. Reality, facts, reason and informed debate seem to have no part to play in this obsession with driving Britain towards Year Zero.’
CO2 is plant food - and therefore food for humanity and all animals. C02 is basis of all life on Earth. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth.
CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.
I stand to be corrected, but am given to understand that academic research and papers not aligned with the fanatical & doom-laden narrative, do not get published or funding.
So true Alex👍
Ones intelligence is inversely proportional to one's enthusiasm for net zero.
Today in Blancafort - inland rural Tarragona Spain - it's 25 degrees C indoors. Not exactly tropical
I have just had the AirCon on in my office this week. First time this year.
Last year it was on from early April to October. But this year, despite having the heating on in the office in early May, was the hottest on record?
They are lying through their teeth
Vote reform clear the WEf out of the government
Try looking up and watch the chemtrails, plenty out today again.
This is an issue where labour are seeking a new form of socialist communism.that what the WEF is about and so was the EU.Blair instigated this
And Blair is now tipped to lead the WEF!
Look up stakeholders communism, Lloyd the nonsense that I'd destroying the West is summarised, I is all interlinked.
China is exporting CO2 in the form of EV’s , solar panels and other goods they manufacture.. ?
Don't vote labour or conservative try someone else
What difference will UK NetZero make to global temperature ?… (numbers from Google)
A … UK emissions per year = 400 million tons .
B … CO2 required to increase global temperature by one degree C = 1 million million tons
Divide A by B to get the reduction in global temperature if UK achieved Net Zero.
Answer; 0.0004 degrees Centigrade per year. That’s four ten-thousandths of one degree C per year … Now you can decide if it's worth it.
Around 80% of the MET Office temperature stations are class 4 or 5, quality. Class 4 can record temperatures as much as 2C above, and class 5 up to 5C above. In other words they are junk status.
Yes net zero will dominate the labour govmt, That means a major disaster. TOtally destructive, impossible. Nightmare. £trillions for the renewable grid, and still nothing to allow us to cnbancel fossil fuels cand 80% of our energy. Hit and miss needs backup which means. Our elec will cost treble our current Costs.
We’re cold, we’re bankrupt but yippee we’re net zero! Vote Reform! 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Can't solve mass immigration, knife crime, drug deaths, crumbling roads, but yes, we can change the climate of an entire planet, but we need to make the least well off even poorer to do it. Yeh, I'll vote for that then.
When Starmer and his mates remove the 18% of carbon, which makes up their worthless bodies. Then, I will listen to Starmer 's opinions, if he is still able to think.
All these net zero gimmicks....electric cars made with huge energy, imported fracked energy, its just nonsense.
I don't fancy recycling 30 million batteries every 8 years.. good luck with that.
Now look up AGENDA 21 this was published in 1992 allin preparation for this
MET OFFICE CORRUPT they know exactly what they are doing to the weather
What will we eat ? We should be helping our farmers not hindering them.
You look at our countryside and it is beautiful all thanks to our farmers.
Net Zero was based on 1 Child ,sadly Dying from an Asthma Attack.
One thing to remember, the I in IPCC stands for Intergovernmental. That says it all.
Most 'wild' fires are not wild, they are set by humans and spread due to poor forestry management.
It’s all about reducing every single thing we love- driving, flying, travelling, eating good organic local seasonal foodstuffs- to be replaced with hunger games 15 min cities ULEZ and worse… all driven by WEFMINSTER & The UN snd co
Diane Abbott for chancellor. You know it's the right thing to do.
Net Zero is prohibitively costly, impractical and totally unnecessary.
Arrhenius who described the greenhouse effect in the late nineteenth century opined that the carbon dioxide emissions from human activity would have the beneficial effects of increased agricultural yields and postponement of the next glacial maximum. You can add reduced winter heating costs and fewer deaths from hypothermia.
This is especially so in cold areas such as the UK.
Net Zero is economically destructive delusional insanity and needs to be urgently abandoned .
The massive misappropriation of taxpayers money and resources into uneconomical and unreliable renewable energy projects needs to be stopped.
We should simply use the most economical energy, transportation and agricultural resources available.
"Net Zero is prohibitively costly, impractical and totally unnecessary." said 2% of scientists who work on these issues.
Labour appeasing the fantasy world believes!
The billionaires laugh at us in how easy it has been get us to fall for their scam which is making them more billions.
We also need to consider how much are we importing which has a carbon footprint.
Evertime we build something there is a carbon footprint. Scrapping stuff for new stuff with questionable technologies is bonkers. Often the measures in Net Zero are actually negative
We know where the majority of emissions come from. Some of the denier arguments like "even your plastics require fossil fuels" completely ignores the fact that that account for 0.03% of the CO2 issue. Of course the resulting plastics have their own issues.
I don't think I've ever heard a single argument that would result in more CO2. Why possible argument is there that you have heard?
They write policy's, to make money for There private Company Bum Chums, Back Hand payments, place on the directors board when you leave the house of lords with cushty salary. This is what Politics is in GB.
Stop Spraying Stuff Into The Atmosphere, Too .
«::V::»«::O::»«::T::»«::E::»🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧 «::R::»«::E::»«::F::»«::O::»«::R::»«::M::»
I know this is not a popular view but i do think there is a connection between women being over represented in senior positions in organisations and this irrational focus on bogus threats and then totally bizarre and pointless responses; such as net zero.
There's an added cost that I doubt is ever included: maintenance and replacement of solar panels and wind mills. Yesterday was hot, said by someone who used to live in tropical Durban, South Africa. But I did miss ceiling fans yesterday. I'm out of the habit of finding the time to slip under a lukewarm/cold shower twice a day.
If the UK was to go completely wind based, it would take the next 20+ years to build the farms. By the time they finished, the first batch of turbines would need replacing, immediately followed by the second and then the third........
❤
It has cost us an extra £18 billion in bills in just 5 years by having wind farms .
Under the labs you will own nothing
Net zero seats for the uniparty
May was cold 2024.
How come we the people never voted for this net zero bs and crap coming from our government 😮
It's all a load of rubbish and we can all see stop all the lies
SCIENCE IS ALL LIES!!!
-- people who failed science classes
UN talking bull again.
Don't sit in warm rain !!!
The earth circles the sun in an elliptical path. Takes a long time but eventually we go into an ice age. In-between weather varies.
Cold weather will kill us way before heat will.
At last somebody else who’s not soft 😊
It is a 52,000 year cycle and has 4 sub cycles, 12,000 years. That defines ice ages but each 12,000 the ice age occurs in different sectors of the planet.
Net 💤💤💤ero...