Understanding Cook's Distance in SPSS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2015
  • This video explains Cook’s Distance using SPSS. Cook’s Distance is a measure of influence for an observation in a linear regression. The relationship between influence, leverage, and outliers is explained.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24

  • @FKAS8410
    @FKAS8410 Рік тому

    no f'ing way I looked this up and its the MAN the MYTH the LEGEND doing SPSS analysis!

  • @karasullivan7919
    @karasullivan7919 7 років тому +2

    Cook's Distance is a concept I have never been exposed to. I see the significance of such a technique to rule out weak influences.Also, I have to familiarize myself with some of the terminology.

  • @SPORTSCIENCEps
    @SPORTSCIENCEps 3 роки тому

    Thank you for uploading it!

  • @sukhdeepchadda7463
    @sukhdeepchadda7463 5 років тому

    Very well explained Dr Todd :)

  • @ElimelchRT
    @ElimelchRT 4 роки тому

    Great videos, you are a good teacher, thanks for sharing, sharing is caring ;)

  • @pokeefe90
    @pokeefe90 7 років тому +7

    Thanks for the video. You mentioned that there are three rules of thumb when interpreting Cook's D. Could you possibly provide references for each?

  • @mutindafestus5619
    @mutindafestus5619 6 років тому +1

    this is a good video
    i also have special problem of a simple linear regression
    where my data has plenty of outliers
    i identified the outliers +high leverage points and removed them on reruning the regression ,a new set of outliers appears
    i tried this thrice and every time i remove outliers a new set emerge i am not sure how much i should remove

  • @erinboardman5575
    @erinboardman5575 7 років тому +2

    Hi Todd,
    Thanks for these videos - they have helped me immensely! You refer to the Cook's distance < 1 rule of thumb (Tabach & Fidell), but can you please advise me of a suitable ref for looking at Cook's distance relative to other cases. Thanks again.

  • @hrosem
    @hrosem Рік тому +1

    Can you explain how you would report this finding in the results section of a report please?

  • @vanessagraham6473
    @vanessagraham6473 7 років тому

    Seems so simple. Will have to investigate further.

  • @turgutcoskun8863
    @turgutcoskun8863 4 роки тому

    Thank you for this nice presentation, what if we want to check the influence of more than one variable in multiple regression? Should we drag them to predictor variable box and save Cook's distance for all of them? Or, one by one ... ?

  • @Btrembz54
    @Btrembz54 5 років тому

    Thanks for the video. Do you know how to find Cooks Distance with SPSS Modeler version 18?

  • @Nihonnelly
    @Nihonnelly 4 роки тому

    Dear Dr. Grande, thank you very much for this video! It seems all feasible to me, yet I run a binary logistic regression in SPSS and my statistician recommended to use Cook's. I run it the way you recommended, though in the window of "Binary logistic". Yet, I cannot find in the output the cook's distance, as the table "residuals statistics" is missing. Is there another way to do that within a logistic regression? I would be very grateful if you could help me out!
    Best, Neeltje

  • @meysm27
    @meysm27 8 років тому

    Hello Doctor
    I have data for Nested ANOVA and it contains four outliers , can I use Cook distance to identify and handle outlier
    also the Leverage method
    Thanks

  • @hopebt8961
    @hopebt8961 Рік тому

    Thank you for your nice discussion in Cook's distance.
    my question to add is what four that you divided by N(sample size)?

  • @zeldafan2137
    @zeldafan2137 5 років тому +1

    What reference did you use for the three rules regarding Cook's distance?- to cite

  • @tonyrandall3146
    @tonyrandall3146 3 роки тому

    You have my thanks

  • @aguilarvf
    @aguilarvf 7 років тому

    Seems simple, could you please help me understanding DFbeta and DFfits please?
    Thanks

  • @jet3doodleart691
    @jet3doodleart691 Рік тому

    Thanks a lot. I pay $1000 for a course in my university and end up confused. I come here and clear my confusions for free.

  • @Icksable
    @Icksable 8 років тому +6

    Hi, you used 4/n to determine whether a value likely had significant influence (and thus be considered for exclusion); however you concluded that 4/n = .25. Shouldn't that have been 0.4 (i.e., 4/100 = 0.4)

    • @DrGrande
      @DrGrande  8 років тому +4

      You are correct - annotation added. Thank you.

    • @ningzhou4140
      @ningzhou4140 5 років тому +5

      0.04

  • @nkristianschmidt
    @nkristianschmidt 8 років тому

    6:12 4/n ... 4/100 = 0.04 ... ?

    • @DrGrande
      @DrGrande  8 років тому

      Yes, 4/100 is .04. I added an annotation to this video. Thank you.