@James Parker, This is a prediction about elementary particles: Mainly only the Down Quarks and Up Quarks make atoms. There are 4 more Quarks which decay into Down Quark and Up Quark in normal conditions. So the high energies inside earth can make two more types of atoms to make hell worlds and hell beings. According to Buddhism there are mainly two groups of hells called Hot hells and Cold hells too. I think definitely there is a very deep level of quantum physics for Ghosts, Gods, Brahma beings etc. According to Quantum Physics our Atoms have two main elementary particles called Up Quark and Down Quark. I think the Mass is a main thing which separate the worlds of living beings. The Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7+0.5; −0.3 MeV/c^2 (The bare mass of the down quark is not well determined, but probably lies between 4.5 and 5.3 MeV/c^2 or Lattice QCD value : 4.79±0.16 MeV/c^2. It Decays into: Stable or Up quark + Electron + Electron antineutrino.). If the standard Down Quark is just a combination of smaller down quarks, and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.467 MeV/c^2 (Around 10 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/10)), and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463 MeV/c^2 (Around 50 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/50)), then maybe those smaller Quarks can make a new type of Atoms which don't require to interact with our Atoms and our elementary particles, and then it can be very difficult for us to discover those smaller Quarks and other smaller elementary particles. The 27km long LHC could discover the 4.7 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 100km long LHC can discover precisely a 0.467 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 500km long LHC can discover a 0.093463 MeV/c^2 particle. My Mathematical Calculation Of The Prediction: The Standard Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7 MeV/C^2 The Standard Mass of a Strange Quark: 96 MeV/C^2 The Standard Mass of a Bottom Quark: 4180 MeV/C^2 The mathematical beauty in the elementary particles in the standard model of particle physics: 4180 MeV/C^2 / 96 MeV/C^2 = 43.54166666666667 or around 40 96 MeV/C^2 / 4.7 MeV/C^2 = 20.42553191489362 or around 20 Prediction 1: 4.7 MeV/C^2 / A small Down Quark = around 10 A small Down Quark = 4.7 MeV/C^2 / 10 A small Down Quark = 0.47 MeV/C^2 Prediction 2: (4.7 MeV/C^2 / 10) / A smaller Down Quark = around 5 A smaller Down Quark = (0.47 MeV/C^2) / 5 A smaller Down Quark = 0.094 MeV/C^2 4180/96 = 43.54166666666667 43.54166666666667 - 40 = 3.541666666666667 3.541666666666667 / 40 = 0.0885416666666667 --- (A) 96/4.7 = 20.42553191489362 20.42553191489362 - 20 = 0.42553191489362 0.42553191489362 / 20 = 0.02127659574468 --- (B) From (A) and (B) 0.0885416666666667 / 0.021276595744681 = 4.1614583333333 0.02127659574468 / 4.1614583333333 = 0.00511277394615 1 - 0.00511277394615 = 0.99488722605385 4.7 x (0.99488722605385) / 10 = 0.4675969962453 --- (C) 4.7 / 10 = 0.47 --- (D) From (C) and (D) 0.47 - 0.4675969962453 = 0.0024030037547 0.0024030037547 / 4 = 0.00060075093867 1 - 0.00060075093867335 = 0.9993992490613 0.4675969962453 x (0.9993992490613) / 5 = 0.093463217 The Mass of a smaller Down Quark: 0.093463217 MeV/c^2 Finding a mathematical beauty to guess a precise value: The Mass of a Down Quark x Spead of light x Spead of light = X (The 'X' is a something like a very high energy.) 0.093463217 x 299 792 458 x 299 792 458 = 8400055030015297 OR around 8400055030000000 Maybe there is a smaller Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463217 MeV/c^2 or 0.09346260470850395 MeV/c^2 for 8400000000000000).
Neutrino physicist here! Loved this video, and will definitely share it and some quotes with my colleagues :D "When you're a neutrino, matter simply doesn't matter" is just great. Some notes: the strong force keeps the nuclei from falling apart; otherwise all those protons would just repel due to the electric force, since they are positively charged. Neutrinos do not change flavor through particle decay, but through the phenomenon of neutrino oscillation. Neutrino is an elementary particle, meaning, it is not composed of any other particles, so it has nothing to decay into. Neutrino oscillation happens because neutrino flavors are actually NOT physical particles, but manifestations of three physical neutrino states that overlap with each other in peculiar ways (remember, particles are waves, so there's kind of destructive and constructive interference between neutrino wavepackets, and flavors come out that way). And you are correct, the T2K result does not have a high significance, meaning, it's rather a hint than evidence or discovery. This experiment was not built to study this phenomenon as its main goal, so it's suboptimal, and that's why we build specific experiments targeting one or other mystery of neutrino. Thanks again for the great take!
Pardon me for asking a dumb layman's question, but i cant resist since you are a real nuclear physicist. Do we know the orientation of nucleons in any given atom? Like, there are protons and nuetrons in the nucleus of most atoms. Right? But nuetrons decay into a proton and an electron. Right? So we can imagine only protons and electrons in the nucleus. it seems then that if they we positioned just right - (ie) such that the static electric fields were perfectly balanced with the negative of the electrons balancing the positive of the protons - then you wouldnt need a Strong force at all. The balanced electric static forces would keep the protons fron flying out of the neucleus. See what I'm saying? I'm sure it's a terribly naive question but ive been wondering this for years. Thx.
@@stevenmohr9863electrons aren't in the nucleus and the strong force keeps the protons and neutrons together from the inside via quarks and gluons. Also, only free neutrons are unstable, neutrons in nuclei are stable.
@@stevenmohr9863 Hey there! Very cool question about neutrons all decaying into protons and having a nucleus with only protons. It somehow makes sense right?? That doesn't happen, because a nucleus undergoing a decay is different from a single free neutron decaying. For example, free neutrons are unstable particles, meaning they don't exist forever even if nothing is happening to them. They decay in around 15 minutes if they just basically sit there or fly around unbothered. However, when a neutron is in an atom, it's not just the one neutron, now it's a whole complex system with the many particles together, one wavefunction with all the particles in it, if you will. The conditions of this neutron, the field it experiences, are different. Actually usually neutrons inside atoms are completely stable, they never decay! Otherwise every atom would be radioactive which they are thankfully not. Any radioactive atom has neutrons decaying, but not indefinitely, eventually we reach a stable atom and stay there. Because, imagine that we could somehow artificially make an atom with just protons and electrons, why wouldn't that work then, if they were positioned just right with magical precision? Well, that's possible only in one case, hydrogen with just one proton and one electron. In all other cases if you have electrons and only protons (balancing with electron charge), the protons would just repel each other and the atom would disintegrate and not live even for a second. So the neutrons are there to just glue in the protons. It can't work that you wouldn't need neutrons at all and electrons would keep the protons smashed together, they would repel. Guess it's like electrons move too much, if you could just fix them in in perfect positions to create a perfect counter-balance to protons repelling - maybe? - but an electron doesn't really have a "position" that way due to its highly quantum nature. Can't really position it right. It's not a naive question, it takes years for a physicist to figure out these things, and I'm not even confident about everything I wrote here, since I'm not very familiar with strong force!
@@JoshVandever Neutrino oscillation is indeed literally particles in superposition! What we humans observe as "neutrinos" - and we observe three kinds, electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino - are not actually particles. They are manifestations of three actual physical particles that travel in space that physicists call simply "neutrino 1", "neutrino 2", and "neutrino 3". Those travel in space as a sort of wavepacket, and depending on the kind of interference of the wavefunctions that travel (imagine sine waves with different phases having constructive and destructive interference), we observe what we see as electron, muon, or tau neutrino. Once you observed an electron neutrino, you know that it's a superposition of neutrino 1, 2 and 3. While they are travelling, it's a superposition of electron, muon, and tau neutrino, since you won't know which one it is until you observe them. So the concept of flavor (that's the name for whether it's electron, muon, or tau) just doesn't exist for the travelling neutrinos; and the concept of which neutrino particle it is (1,2 or 3 we call mass states of neutrino, physical states) doesn't exist when it's observed. Think of it as a spinning die that's flying towards a table. Which number is it showing? The concept of "showing" only exists when the die lands. Or in other words you could say, the die is in a superposition of all possible numbers. The die spins, neutrinos oscillate - because of superposition! 100% correct on your part.
Congratulations. You have survived the barrage of petty insults, you are now at the stage where you would look strange without the glorious mustache. Never go back!
GAGAGAGAGAGA! I will now count to 3 and then I am still the unprettiest UA-camr of all time. 1...2...3. GAGAGAGAGAGA!!! Btw I have TWO very HOT GIRLfriends who I show off in my v*deos. Thank you for your attention, dear fors
Ah, when I see that the video was posted just 42 minutes ago, it's as if the universe just bestowed me with a gift from Thoughty2. Especially when it's physics-related because I love physics.
“Matter and antimatter should have annilated each other in one bug orgie of cancel culture!” Just...🤦♂️....😂. Thank you Thoughty2 for speaking this sentence into existence.
@@Ice.muffin Some people are always vigorously opposed to technical advancements. The only difference between some sh*t-tier idea from a mental case and a genius with a breakthrough is how many people see it and support it in the beginning, that is until someone sees it that actually knows what they're talking about and can grasp the concept. It can be passed off 100 times for 15+ years, but finally only takes one for the right person to hear it in an attractive way. These people we call arrogant idiots are found frequently on reddit, and are commonly understood to have migrated in from other lower intelligence social networks. Since those terms are not commonly associated with a technology yet, here are their summaries: SiC stands for Silicon Carbide, a ceramic crystal made from silicon and carbon in a roughly 3.5:1 ratio. It can be doped with positive and negative dopants to form a semiconductor. It is more tolerant than standard silicon to heat and radiation, and is used in making 98-99% efficient power inverters and other electronics, also at an increased energy density and with a significantly reduced gate leakage current. Graphistors or GFETs are transistor-like circuit components made partly from graphene. A developing concept that can offer much higher switching speeds, higher temperatures, more durability, lower leakage, smaller size, the whole deal. It is further out in theory, as creating the graphene channel, placing, and bonding it is difficult, and may never be widely used versus other competing semiconductor designs (graphenea.com). Optronics (generally read as 'optical electronics'; and unfortunately the name of an LED company) is the nickname for any time-of-flight computations done with the various features of wave-like light and photons, either in optical glass, in a hollow fiber, or in any other waveguide. It sounds better than "photonic computing" or "interference patterns for computing second-order derivatives". If modern integrated circuits take nanoseconds, microseconds, and milliseconds to compute and shuttle around data, optronics has the potential to do far more complex operations in just picoseconds to nanoseconds. A lot of potential, including being able to send a message to the other side of the globe in less than 70 milliseconds flat (240+ milliseconds with modern backbone tech). Afterword: I guess I didn't get the honor of coining the term hollow core fiber optics, but it did blow up in popularity after I took the position of the Nth person to look at the concept and see promise (most people didn't believe light could go 50% faster than through existing pulled-strand fiber optic cables, I had to point out the refractive index and they finally shut the hell up). phys.org/search/page4.html?search=hollow+core+fiber+optics
@@Baigle1 look, you might know what you're talking about, but when you reference people as "unintelligent" just because they use a certain platform (Twitter has no exceptions they are actually mental) it does make me sort of question your credibility. I might not be able to speak much for myself as I do the same, and just did with Twitter, but I do have some concept of these new technologies. And although I'm no expert, graphene ICs do seem very promising to me. It would be a huge leap from FinFETs, a derivative of MOSFETs, and especially CMOS level transistors
Not so sure, because are eyes necessarily needed for a face? [I am NOT giving you a hard time. Somehow I also found time for contemplating the logic of grouping different hair]!
i dont know.. they are on the face yes but id categorize them as a feature consisting of hair... you can shave your beard and no one will blink an eye but if you shave your eyebrows you look like a misformed alien baby
Thoughty, I really enjoy your videos. I also really enjoy your puns and jokes. If you don't pay someone to make these for you, then your ability to make me laugh and be fascinated at the same time is just as great as your work making these. Never underestimate the ability to make someone laugh. Thank you Thoughty.
Neutrinos are that guy that throws a foldable chair at a crowd, getting everyone to suddenly start fighting each other. _"Oh man, I didn't mean to create time... shiiiiieeeeeet..."_
16:12 Just to make it more clear, Awesome Moustache Guy mentions "faster than the speed of light in water". Those particles temporarily accelerate at a speed greater than ~ 0,75c thus emit Cherenkov radiation -- speed of light in water is about 0,75c or 225 000 km/s.
"There are certain shades of blue which I've learned to take notice of!": Vexxarr, of the web comic of the same name. (That may not be the exact quote, but it's close enough) :D
*A Co-incidental Fact :* In 2012, a 10 year old fifth grader student of Kansas city, Missouri created a new molecule 'Tetranitratoxycarbon' in her science class accidentally !! ~ Facts by Curious JB
@@eliza8994 Well, yes and no. The girl build the model. It is an hypothetical molecule. Right now, computational chemistry predict it could exist. But even if it did, it would be too thermally unstable to use.
To say that she "created" it is incorrect. It's more like "invented the concept of" rather than actually creating it. I'd guess there are plenty of molecules which could theoretically exist, but be too unstable to be of practical value, like azizoazide azide. If my information is correct, this molecule is made of nothing but nitrogen atoms but is so unstable that it will randomly and suddenly decay explosively for no detectable reason (although a good working theory would be that a passing neutrino managed to interact with it instead of just passing through it without touching it).
To those interested, search for the "IceCube" project: they build a huge netrino detector in Antarctica, nearly 3 km in depth, and it's beyond awesome!
The BEST thing about this MEGAPROJECTS related to neutrinos is that they are SO FAR APPART from each others: . USA (north+west) . CHINA (north+east) . Antarctica (South^2) . (other places) If an astronomically catastrofically awesome event happens in the universe that makes enough neutrinos to "trigger" all of them, it will NOT happen at the same time [the "sphere of ilumination" of the neutrinos will be a practically perfect "flat wall" by the time it reaches Earth, triggering events at different times as it moves almost at the speed of light through it]. -> While they are NOT built precisely for this, they can still help traditional observatories (and the new gravitational waves ones) to both confirm the general direction of the "source" and the time of arrival of the event.
How does he make so detailed and quality videos in such a short amount of time? I think that he has recorded these videos sometime before and he always has 3-4 videos in his archive that he releases one after the other and shoots the new ones way ahead of time.
Fun Fact: The 1960's "Supermarionation" TV show "FIreball XL5" featured a "Neutroni Radio" which supposedly used Neutrinos instead of electromagnetic waves as its transmission medium. Supposedly, it communicated instantly (maybe they mixed up neutrinos with tachyons). Funnily enough, someone on Gerry Anderson's team of writers seemingly knew enough science to know that if XL5 flew too close to the sun, the neutroni radio would have its signal swamped by the neutrinos emitted by the sun, because there was a (written for a book, not part of the TV series) story where that happened as a background event to the actual story.
I have seen a video of the spark made when Neutrinos and Electrons collide and it's really something else, man. Glad to be part of this generation that can actually answer such mysteries and hard questions. For those of you who wants to watch it for yourselves, it's on Neil's Cosmos: season 1.
He has the most interesting topics. I’ve always been under the belief that neutrinos have zero effect on matter. This makes me feel like I should rethink my beliefs. Oh man, that curry bit got me chuckling. 😂😂😂😂 He’s the perfect balance of truth of so many varieties, and also being able to not be too serious.
UA-cam has a feature where before you even publish a video, you can give alternate titles and thumbnails. Then, if a video is under-performing compared to the average video on the channel, you can set it to change the title and/or thumbnail to see if it helps change the performance. This can all occur pretty soon after a video goes live, especially on big channels where it will get a not insignificant amount of views pretty quickly.
I had an encounter with a neutrino collision years ago. ( Long story) It baffled me a long time before I learned about how electronics can be affected.
Photons always arrive in quanta and neutrinos always start out and decay from quanta. Makes me wonder if there's a correlation between the two. Also neutrinos are a good candidate for dark matter because they behave the same. And if neutrinos have mass they should loosely clump together and form fast moving filaments.
Glad to hear Japan is actually working towards understanding neutrino physics, and thus being able to tomographically map the entire interior volume of the Earth.
That's because all men are women initially and only within the first few months in pregnancy develop into a man while already having developed nipples, vaginal slit (check under your sack lol) and other good stuff that keeps you in touch with your feminine inside. And your female genome still persists inside your DNA. That's why I'm fine with women ruling the world, that's how nature intended it.
This guy is beyond amazing. Besides his incredible talents and ability to work, he is very funny and a nice person. He accumulated over 600 M views, YT would've paid over 2M bucks for advertisement, he said no, I know better. Crayzee. Altogether he is an almost perfect human being. Why almost? ... For he is much too good. His conscious mind is so brilliant and supreme to others, that he can go easily blind by important issues, those are not product of the mind and take about 99.99% of what there is. He is the King of the 0.01%, unchallenged.
Part of the reason neutrinos are so damn difficult to observe is that they are almost completely massless and do not react with matter like other particles. This is why so many pass through everything so easily and unnoticed. I will say that I did not know the T2K worked like that, and I think it’s cool you can sort of cause faster than light travel by changing the medium. Gotta love physics.
Had the same question so I looked it up. Seems Cherenkov radiation is about when light travels faster in a medium then it normally should be. In a medium light travels slower.
@@mrclint7377 So that means it's not traveling faster than the speed of light, but faster than light does under certain specific circumstances? I have to look this up, it's breaking my brain :D
I am speechless. The curry reference was magic. I've been meaning to thank you for what you do, I think that it is very important and awfully well done. Cheers from Ferry Den, Scotland.
There is a neutrino lab in my hometown of Soudan, Minnesota USA. It is the oldest, richest and deepest Iron ore mine in the state. Closing in the 1960s, it was gifted to the state to be preserved. They started doing neutrino lab tests there in the 90s/00s i believe. The University of Minnesota owned it until a couple years ago when a Japanese company bought it; i wonder if this is the same company in the video? Definitely worth a Google. Ps. You can visit the mine today and actually go a half mile underground to tour the lab and/or the old mine shafts.
Thank you for this video. A friend of mine is a scientist who bewildered me with in depth conversation about neutrinos. This video is much closer to my level of comprehension. :)
This is a prediction about elementary particles: Mainly only the Down Quarks and Up Quarks make atoms. There are 4 more Quarks which decay into Down Quark and Up Quark in normal conditions. So the high energies inside earth can make two more types of atoms to make hell worlds and hell beings. According to Buddhism there are mainly two groups of hells called Hot hells and Cold hells too. I think definitely there is a very deep level of quantum physics for Ghosts, Gods, Brahma beings etc. According to Quantum Physics our Atoms have two main elementary particles called Up Quark and Down Quark. I think the Mass is a main thing which separate the worlds of living beings. The Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7+0.5; −0.3 MeV/c^2 (The bare mass of the down quark is not well determined, but probably lies between 4.5 and 5.3 MeV/c^2 or Lattice QCD value : 4.79±0.16 MeV/c^2. It Decays into: Stable or Up quark + Electron + Electron antineutrino.). If the standard Down Quark is just a combination of smaller down quarks, and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.467 MeV/c^2 (Around 10 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/10)), and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463 MeV/c^2 (Around 50 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/50)), then maybe those smaller Quarks can make a new type of Atoms which don't require to interact with our Atoms and our elementary particles, and then it can be very difficult for us to discover those smaller Quarks and other smaller elementary particles. The 27km long LHC could discover the 4.7 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 100km long LHC can discover precisely a 0.467 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 500km long LHC can discover a 0.093463 MeV/c^2 particle. My Mathematical Calculation Of The Prediction: The Standard Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7 MeV/C^2 The Standard Mass of a Strange Quark: 96 MeV/C^2 The Standard Mass of a Bottom Quark: 4180 MeV/C^2 The mathematical beauty in the elementary particles in the standard model of particle physics: 4180 MeV/C^2 / 96 MeV/C^2 = 43.54166666666667 or around 40 96 MeV/C^2 / 4.7 MeV/C^2 = 20.42553191489362 or around 20 Prediction 1: 4.7 MeV/C^2 / A small Down Quark = around 10 A small Down Quark = 4.7 MeV/C^2 / 10 A small Down Quark = 0.47 MeV/C^2 Prediction 2: (4.7 MeV/C^2 / 10) / A smaller Down Quark = around 5 A smaller Down Quark = (0.47 MeV/C^2) / 5 A smaller Down Quark = 0.094 MeV/C^2 4180/96 = 43.54166666666667 43.54166666666667 - 40 = 3.541666666666667 3.541666666666667 / 40 = 0.0885416666666667 --- (A) 96/4.7 = 20.42553191489362 20.42553191489362 - 20 = 0.42553191489362 0.42553191489362 / 20 = 0.02127659574468 --- (B) From (A) and (B) 0.0885416666666667 / 0.021276595744681 = 4.1614583333333 0.02127659574468 / 4.1614583333333 = 0.00511277394615 1 - 0.00511277394615 = 0.99488722605385 4.7 x (0.99488722605385) / 10 = 0.4675969962453 --- (C) 4.7 / 10 = 0.47 --- (D) From (C) and (D) 0.47 - 0.4675969962453 = 0.0024030037547 0.0024030037547 / 4 = 0.00060075093867 1 - 0.00060075093867335 = 0.9993992490613 0.4675969962453 x (0.9993992490613) / 5 = 0.093463217 The Mass of a smaller Down Quark: 0.093463217 MeV/c^2 Finding a mathematical beauty to guess a precise value: The Mass of a Down Quark x Spead of light x Spead of light = X (The 'X' is a something like a very high energy.) 0.093463217 x 299 792 458 x 299 792 458 = 8400055030015297 OR around 8400055030000000 Maybe there is a smaller Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463217 MeV/c^2 or 0.09346260470850395 MeV/c^2 for 8400000000000000).
@Uncle Bruce, I think the Universe made 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and another 16 elementary particles against the it with the nature of antimatter which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass, charge and spin between shared dimensions with dimensional gaps it caused a tiny unbalance in the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a very small portion of elementary particles (1 from 3000000001). The early universe was a thing with nothings, so the direction of a nothing (0) thing = +0-0 What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe. Finding The Dimensions In The Universe Mathematically: According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2 The duality of 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: Matter + Antimatter = (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6 (+0-0)^6 = (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3 = ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism. Step 1: i: (+1-(-1))^3 = A: + (+1)3 B: - ((+1)3 x (-1) C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) D: + (-1)2 x (+1) - ( E: + (+1)2 x (-1) F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 G: - ((-1)3 x (+1))) H: + (-1)3) )) x ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) - W.S. Madusanka
@Uncle Bruce, About what? Scientics discovered this: Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a very small portion of elementary particles (1 from 3000000001).
Modern science shows its limits when it refuses to explore the idea that the universe is holding itself together consciously, rather than through some mechanical law of physics.
@@kirkhamandy Amazing how patient he is in tinkering this. maybe it makes sense I will try this. seems he changed the title 3 times over the course of 1 hour.
There is not such thing as 'pure energy' as long as there is 'non-pure energy'. Every energy has a form, so is 'pure' formless? Don't you read too much without getting deep enough? Man, I liked your channel, but first: Czechia is 'eastern Europe', and now 'pure energy' sprung out... and the smirky half-witted chestnutlike comparisons... a smoke screen for riding waves without diving in. I have become and am a troll for you. One sub down. Now. Bye. Be your own Einstein.
Holy shit...i cant recall qhen Ibwas looking up at the skyvwith my boys and explaining to them all this shit. And we were there, lying in the ground, whatching the perseidas.... But life keeps living and...Ibhate those are only memories now. I want all that shit back and have this kind of conversation... But life, man. Especially in 2020.
There are more than 4 fundamental forces! What is heat? Mass? Information? Radiation? A force makes something else become similar to it. I enjoy your production quality!
It's been a year or more since youtube recommended one of your videos to me. Glad to see you're still posting! Nice stache btw, you look like a Victorian detective or something.
Something about antimatter baffles me: Who says that most of the universe is matter rather than antimatter? If antimatter behaves (mostly) like matter, how do we know about any distant star whether it's made from matter or antimatter? All we have is light. Fusion of hydrogen into helium, for example, will emit the same radiation as fusion of anti-hydrogen into anti-helium, I expect. Absorption of certain wavelengths of light should be the same with atoms as with anti-atoms. And so on... So we have no way of telling if a star other than Sun is made front antimatter. An evidence against antimatter in our galaxy is the fact that we haven't received a rock from space made from antimatter, which would've caused a spectacular explosion. What about other galaxies? Or if that's too close, what about other clusters of galaxies? As there's no proper exchange between them, matter and antimatter clusters could easily coexist. Big bang - in the super-dense soup of creating/annihilating of various particles I guess there were areas with more nucleons and areas with more anti-nucleons. As the universe expanded and cooled down, the former formed areas of universe mainly made from matter and the latter those mainly made from antimatter. So please, Thoughty2, shed some light to why it wouldn't be so. Maybe the background microwave radiation wouldn't be as it is... Maybe ...?
WIMP, MACHO or GIMP, which are you? Help support the channel by checking out Blinkist free for 7 days www.blinkist.com/thoughty2
I’ve been watching your videos for a month now, but this is BY FAR my favorite channel!!!
Macho wimp
@@elcidgaming likewise.
@James Parker, This is a prediction about elementary particles: Mainly only the Down Quarks and Up Quarks make atoms. There are 4 more Quarks which decay into Down Quark and Up Quark in normal conditions. So the high energies inside earth can make two more types of atoms to make hell worlds and hell beings. According to Buddhism there are mainly two groups of hells called Hot hells and Cold hells too. I think definitely there is a very deep level of quantum physics for Ghosts, Gods, Brahma beings etc. According to Quantum Physics our Atoms have two main elementary particles called Up Quark and Down Quark. I think the Mass is a main thing which separate the worlds of living beings. The Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7+0.5; −0.3 MeV/c^2 (The bare mass of the down quark is not well determined, but probably lies between 4.5 and 5.3 MeV/c^2 or Lattice QCD value : 4.79±0.16 MeV/c^2. It Decays into: Stable or Up quark + Electron + Electron antineutrino.). If the standard Down Quark is just a combination of smaller down quarks, and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.467 MeV/c^2 (Around 10 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/10)), and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463 MeV/c^2 (Around 50 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/50)), then maybe those smaller Quarks can make a new type of Atoms which don't require to interact with our Atoms and our elementary particles, and then it can be very difficult for us to discover those smaller Quarks and other smaller elementary particles. The 27km long LHC could discover the 4.7 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 100km long LHC can discover precisely a 0.467 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 500km long LHC can discover a 0.093463 MeV/c^2 particle.
My Mathematical Calculation Of The Prediction:
The Standard Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7 MeV/C^2
The Standard Mass of a Strange Quark: 96 MeV/C^2
The Standard Mass of a Bottom Quark: 4180 MeV/C^2
The mathematical beauty in the elementary particles in the standard model of particle physics:
4180 MeV/C^2 / 96 MeV/C^2 = 43.54166666666667 or around 40
96 MeV/C^2 / 4.7 MeV/C^2 = 20.42553191489362 or around 20
Prediction 1:
4.7 MeV/C^2 / A small Down Quark = around 10
A small Down Quark = 4.7 MeV/C^2 / 10
A small Down Quark = 0.47 MeV/C^2
Prediction 2:
(4.7 MeV/C^2 / 10) / A smaller Down Quark = around 5
A smaller Down Quark = (0.47 MeV/C^2) / 5
A smaller Down Quark = 0.094 MeV/C^2
4180/96 = 43.54166666666667
43.54166666666667 - 40 = 3.541666666666667
3.541666666666667 / 40 = 0.0885416666666667 --- (A)
96/4.7 = 20.42553191489362
20.42553191489362 - 20 = 0.42553191489362
0.42553191489362 / 20 = 0.02127659574468 --- (B)
From (A) and (B)
0.0885416666666667 / 0.021276595744681 = 4.1614583333333
0.02127659574468 / 4.1614583333333 = 0.00511277394615
1 - 0.00511277394615 = 0.99488722605385
4.7 x (0.99488722605385) / 10 = 0.4675969962453 --- (C)
4.7 / 10 = 0.47 --- (D)
From (C) and (D)
0.47 - 0.4675969962453 = 0.0024030037547
0.0024030037547 / 4 = 0.00060075093867
1 - 0.00060075093867335 = 0.9993992490613
0.4675969962453 x (0.9993992490613) / 5 = 0.093463217
The Mass of a smaller Down Quark: 0.093463217 MeV/c^2
Finding a mathematical beauty to guess a precise value:
The Mass of a Down Quark x Spead of light x Spead of light = X (The 'X' is a something like a very high energy.)
0.093463217 x 299 792 458 x 299 792 458 = 8400055030015297 OR around 8400055030000000
Maybe there is a smaller Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463217 MeV/c^2 or 0.09346260470850395 MeV/c^2 for 8400000000000000).
- W. Suresh
Is that really a bdsm game? If so why is this the first time im hearing about it?
Neutrino physicist here! Loved this video, and will definitely share it and some quotes with my colleagues :D "When you're a neutrino, matter simply doesn't matter" is just great. Some notes: the strong force keeps the nuclei from falling apart; otherwise all those protons would just repel due to the electric force, since they are positively charged. Neutrinos do not change flavor through particle decay, but through the phenomenon of neutrino oscillation. Neutrino is an elementary particle, meaning, it is not composed of any other particles, so it has nothing to decay into. Neutrino oscillation happens because neutrino flavors are actually NOT physical particles, but manifestations of three physical neutrino states that overlap with each other in peculiar ways (remember, particles are waves, so there's kind of destructive and constructive interference between neutrino wavepackets, and flavors come out that way). And you are correct, the T2K result does not have a high significance, meaning, it's rather a hint than evidence or discovery. This experiment was not built to study this phenomenon as its main goal, so it's suboptimal, and that's why we build specific experiments targeting one or other mystery of neutrino. Thanks again for the great take!
Pardon me for asking a dumb layman's question, but i cant resist since you are a real nuclear physicist. Do we know the orientation of nucleons in any given atom? Like, there are protons and nuetrons in the nucleus of most atoms. Right? But nuetrons decay into a proton and an electron. Right? So we can imagine only protons and electrons in the nucleus. it seems then that if they we positioned just right - (ie) such that the static electric fields were perfectly balanced with the negative of the electrons balancing the positive of the protons - then you wouldnt need a Strong force at all. The balanced electric static forces would keep the protons fron flying out of the neucleus. See what I'm saying? I'm sure it's a terribly naive question but ive been wondering this for years. Thx.
@@stevenmohr9863electrons aren't in the nucleus and the strong force keeps the protons and neutrons together from the inside via quarks and gluons. Also, only free neutrons are unstable, neutrons in nuclei are stable.
Can the neutrino occilations be like the kind of particle in superposition. Why or why not?
@@stevenmohr9863 Hey there! Very cool question about neutrons all decaying into protons and having a nucleus with only protons. It somehow makes sense right?? That doesn't happen, because a nucleus undergoing a decay is different from a single free neutron decaying. For example, free neutrons are unstable particles, meaning they don't exist forever even if nothing is happening to them. They decay in around 15 minutes if they just basically sit there or fly around unbothered. However, when a neutron is in an atom, it's not just the one neutron, now it's a whole complex system with the many particles together, one wavefunction with all the particles in it, if you will. The conditions of this neutron, the field it experiences, are different. Actually usually neutrons inside atoms are completely stable, they never decay! Otherwise every atom would be radioactive which they are thankfully not. Any radioactive atom has neutrons decaying, but not indefinitely, eventually we reach a stable atom and stay there. Because, imagine that we could somehow artificially make an atom with just protons and electrons, why wouldn't that work then, if they were positioned just right with magical precision? Well, that's possible only in one case, hydrogen with just one proton and one electron. In all other cases if you have electrons and only protons (balancing with electron charge), the protons would just repel each other and the atom would disintegrate and not live even for a second. So the neutrons are there to just glue in the protons. It can't work that you wouldn't need neutrons at all and electrons would keep the protons smashed together, they would repel. Guess it's like electrons move too much, if you could just fix them in in perfect positions to create a perfect counter-balance to protons repelling - maybe? - but an electron doesn't really have a "position" that way due to its highly quantum nature. Can't really position it right. It's not a naive question, it takes years for a physicist to figure out these things, and I'm not even confident about everything I wrote here, since I'm not very familiar with strong force!
@@JoshVandever Neutrino oscillation is indeed literally particles in superposition! What we humans observe as "neutrinos" - and we observe three kinds, electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino - are not actually particles. They are manifestations of three actual physical particles that travel in space that physicists call simply "neutrino 1", "neutrino 2", and "neutrino 3". Those travel in space as a sort of wavepacket, and depending on the kind of interference of the wavefunctions that travel (imagine sine waves with different phases having constructive and destructive interference), we observe what we see as electron, muon, or tau neutrino. Once you observed an electron neutrino, you know that it's a superposition of neutrino 1, 2 and 3. While they are travelling, it's a superposition of electron, muon, and tau neutrino, since you won't know which one it is until you observe them. So the concept of flavor (that's the name for whether it's electron, muon, or tau) just doesn't exist for the travelling neutrinos; and the concept of which neutrino particle it is (1,2 or 3 we call mass states of neutrino, physical states) doesn't exist when it's observed. Think of it as a spinning die that's flying towards a table. Which number is it showing? The concept of "showing" only exists when the die lands. Or in other words you could say, the die is in a superposition of all possible numbers. The die spins, neutrinos oscillate - because of superposition! 100% correct on your part.
Congratulations.
You have survived the barrage of petty insults, you are now at the stage where you would look strange without the glorious mustache.
Never go back!
I am thinking of copying his moustache.
GAGAGAGAGAGA! I will now count to 3 and then I am still the unprettiest UA-camr of all time. 1...2...3. GAGAGAGAGAGA!!! Btw I have TWO very HOT GIRLfriends who I show off in my v*deos. Thank you for your attention, dear fors
@@AxxLAfriku i thought you were joking but then i looked at your channel
People like you are the worst, feeding one’s delusions is not a nice thing.
Petty Insults? Down with the haters, his "stache is the stuff of LEGENDS. LEGENDS ,I TELL YOU!
Ah, when I see that the video was posted just 42 minutes ago, it's as if the universe just bestowed me with a gift from Thoughty2. Especially when it's physics-related because I love physics.
Underrated comment.
Too bad you'll get more than 42 likes
Me too😊
The only videos that stops me in my tracks
“Matter and antimatter should have annilated each other in one bug orgie of cancel culture!”
Just...🤦♂️....😂. Thank you Thoughty2 for speaking this sentence into existence.
Just that alone was worth the like on the video.
I went into an absolute hysterical fit of laughter for the way he said it. 🤣
Most bizarre objects in the universe:
MACHO
WIMPS
GIMPS
SIMPS
Love it
Most bizarre of all is T.R.U.M.P.
...an also... TRUMP, BIDEN, CLINTON, OBAMA....
?
MACHO isn't an -imps 😂. It has to rhyme to make it true 🤣
I would seriously listen to any audio book narrated by you. Your voice is so soothing
The mention of my computer crashing thanks to neutrinos was a reminder to click the save button on a work project.
Good 👌
a depressing reminder that we do not yet have SiCs, graphistors, or optronics.
@@Baigle1 I don't think the average person even knows what those are...
@@Ice.muffin Some people are always vigorously opposed to technical advancements. The only difference between some sh*t-tier idea from a mental case and a genius with a breakthrough is how many people see it and support it in the beginning, that is until someone sees it that actually knows what they're talking about and can grasp the concept. It can be passed off 100 times for 15+ years, but finally only takes one for the right person to hear it in an attractive way. These people we call arrogant idiots are found frequently on reddit, and are commonly understood to have migrated in from other lower intelligence social networks.
Since those terms are not commonly associated with a technology yet, here are their summaries:
SiC stands for Silicon Carbide, a ceramic crystal made from silicon and carbon in a roughly 3.5:1 ratio. It can be doped with positive and negative dopants to form a semiconductor. It is more tolerant than standard silicon to heat and radiation, and is used in making 98-99% efficient power inverters and other electronics, also at an increased energy density and with a significantly reduced gate leakage current.
Graphistors or GFETs are transistor-like circuit components made partly from graphene. A developing concept that can offer much higher switching speeds, higher temperatures, more durability, lower leakage, smaller size, the whole deal. It is further out in theory, as creating the graphene channel, placing, and bonding it is difficult, and may never be widely used versus other competing semiconductor designs (graphenea.com).
Optronics (generally read as 'optical electronics'; and unfortunately the name of an LED company) is the nickname for any time-of-flight computations done with the various features of wave-like light and photons, either in optical glass, in a hollow fiber, or in any other waveguide. It sounds better than "photonic computing" or "interference patterns for computing second-order derivatives". If modern integrated circuits take nanoseconds, microseconds, and milliseconds to compute and shuttle around data, optronics has the potential to do far more complex operations in just picoseconds to nanoseconds. A lot of potential, including being able to send a message to the other side of the globe in less than 70 milliseconds flat (240+ milliseconds with modern backbone tech).
Afterword: I guess I didn't get the honor of coining the term hollow core fiber optics, but it did blow up in popularity after I took the position of the Nth person to look at the concept and see promise (most people didn't believe light could go 50% faster than through existing pulled-strand fiber optic cables, I had to point out the refractive index and they finally shut the hell up). phys.org/search/page4.html?search=hollow+core+fiber+optics
@@Baigle1 look, you might know what you're talking about, but when you reference people as "unintelligent" just because they use a certain platform (Twitter has no exceptions they are actually mental) it does make me sort of question your credibility. I might not be able to speak much for myself as I do the same, and just did with Twitter, but I do have some concept of these new technologies. And although I'm no expert, graphene ICs do seem very promising to me. It would be a huge leap from FinFETs, a derivative of MOSFETs, and especially CMOS level transistors
*Yes,* eyebrows ARE facial hair.
I dunno, maybe if you gave some evidence...
Not so sure, because are eyes necessarily needed for a face? [I am NOT giving you a hard time. Somehow I also found time for contemplating the logic of grouping different hair]!
This one knows too much, we must delete them.
i dont know.. they are on the face yes but id categorize them as a feature consisting of hair... you can shave your beard and no one will blink an eye but if you shave your eyebrows you look like a misformed alien baby
@@mironinopetr6982 Are they hair? Yes. Are they on your face? Yes. How much more evidence do you need?
Hey Arran! I bought your book on audible, and absolutely love it. Thanks for all the hard work, you're amazing.
Thoughty, I really enjoy your videos. I also really enjoy your puns and jokes. If you don't pay someone to make these for you, then your ability to make me laugh and be fascinated at the same time is just as great as your work making these. Never underestimate the ability to make someone laugh. Thank you Thoughty.
Just go back and see some of his first. Or you can tjek the link below.
This man has made a decision to answer every question in r/ShowerThoughts.
ShowerThoughty2
Never washing towels again
@@NotRKelly. have fun being gross
@@NotRKelly. they get mold if not wash
ua-cam.com/video/hnimHK-yMwc/v-deo.html
Neutrinos are that guy that throws a foldable chair at a crowd, getting everyone to suddenly start fighting each other.
_"Oh man, I didn't mean to create time... shiiiiieeeeeet..."_
Love these videos, especially the science ones. Please keep these vids up.
Damn, those side comments while narrating, I love this video. 10/10. Give the script writters a cookie. Hahaha!
The yoddle at 7:33 killed me.
My wife got me your book in hardcover for my birthday Saturday. That was a huge surprise.
"Gravity is the thing that stops you from drifting off into space when you fart" you have my subscription.
Just burb and you're right back home. :o)
16.11.2021.
I was won over with that exact sentence myself.
16:12 Just to make it more clear, Awesome Moustache Guy mentions "faster than the speed of light in water". Those particles temporarily accelerate at a speed greater than ~ 0,75c thus emit Cherenkov radiation -- speed of light in water is about 0,75c or 225 000 km/s.
"There are certain shades of blue which I've learned to take notice of!": Vexxarr, of the web comic of the same name.
(That may not be the exact quote, but it's close enough) :D
You've mixed acceleration and velocity.
You have such an excellent balance of humor and information. Well done.
*A Co-incidental Fact :*
In 2012, a 10 year old fifth grader student of Kansas city, Missouri created a new molecule 'Tetranitratoxycarbon' in her science class accidentally !!
~ Facts by Curious JB
Is this true??
@@eliza8994 no
@@eliza8994 Well, yes and no. The girl build the model. It is an hypothetical molecule. Right now, computational chemistry predict it could exist. But even if it did, it would be too thermally unstable to use.
Sounds like it doesn't have enough oxygen to throw it in the gas tank, either.
To say that she "created" it is incorrect. It's more like "invented the concept of" rather than actually creating it.
I'd guess there are plenty of molecules which could theoretically exist, but be too unstable to be of practical value, like azizoazide azide. If my information is correct, this molecule is made of nothing but nitrogen atoms but is so unstable that it will randomly and suddenly decay explosively for no detectable reason (although a good working theory would be that a passing neutrino managed to interact with it instead of just passing through it without touching it).
Can someone Photoshop his mustache into his eyebrows, please.
I feel like this was done in a recent video 🤣
To those interested, search for the "IceCube" project: they build a huge netrino detector in Antarctica, nearly 3 km in depth, and it's beyond awesome!
The BEST thing about this MEGAPROJECTS related to neutrinos is that they are SO FAR APPART from each others:
. USA (north+west)
. CHINA (north+east)
. Antarctica (South^2)
. (other places)
If an astronomically catastrofically awesome event happens in the universe that makes enough neutrinos to "trigger" all of them, it will NOT happen at the same time [the "sphere of ilumination" of the neutrinos will be a practically perfect "flat wall" by the time it reaches Earth, triggering events at different times as it moves almost at the speed of light through it].
-> While they are NOT built precisely for this, they can still help traditional observatories (and the new gravitational waves ones) to both confirm the general direction of the "source" and the time of arrival of the event.
How does he make so detailed and quality videos in such a short amount of time? I think that he has recorded these videos sometime before and he always has 3-4 videos in his archive that he releases one after the other and shoots the new ones way ahead of time.
He's a time traveler😮
That's a really Retro look you've got there! That was a very informative video delivered with great wit. Thank you for your great videos!
Fun Fact: The 1960's "Supermarionation" TV show "FIreball XL5" featured a "Neutroni Radio" which supposedly used Neutrinos instead of electromagnetic waves as its transmission medium. Supposedly, it communicated instantly (maybe they mixed up neutrinos with tachyons). Funnily enough, someone on Gerry Anderson's team of writers seemingly knew enough science to know that if XL5 flew too close to the sun, the neutroni radio would have its signal swamped by the neutrinos emitted by the sun, because there was a (written for a book, not part of the TV series) story where that happened as a background event to the actual story.
Thank u thought2 for providing content that distracts me, entertains and makes me think hard enough to forget about politics for a few minutes.
I have seen a video of the spark made when Neutrinos and Electrons collide and it's really something else, man. Glad to be part of this generation that can actually answer such mysteries and hard questions. For those of you who wants to watch it for yourselves, it's on Neil's Cosmos: season 1.
He has the most interesting topics. I’ve always been under the belief that neutrinos have zero effect on matter. This makes me feel like I should rethink my beliefs.
Oh man, that curry bit got me chuckling. 😂😂😂😂 He’s the perfect balance of truth of so many varieties, and also being able to not be too serious.
I never cease to find myself in awe by Thoughty2's dedication of going out there and filming everything.
those are stock footages lol
No, he’s also ant man. Films his own quantum matter irl
@@endor8witch I think that was the joke...
The constant change of titles makes me think Thoughty's running some sort of yet unknown psychological experiment on us. For a future video maybe?
Or he's just incredibly indecisive.
Or both
100% agree, either psychological or algorithm experiment!
Or he just hits the meth pipe after uploading each video
UA-cam has a feature where before you even publish a video, you can give alternate titles and thumbnails. Then, if a video is under-performing compared to the average video on the channel, you can set it to change the title and/or thumbnail to see if it helps change the performance. This can all occur pretty soon after a video goes live, especially on big channels where it will get a not insignificant amount of views pretty quickly.
Thank you for this, and all of other phenomenal videos 💜
I had an encounter with a neutrino collision years ago. ( Long story)
It baffled me a long time before I learned about how electronics can be affected.
you really did explained it well, with a spice of good ol' british humor...
Loving all the videos, I really love learning new things I wouldn’t have come across normally
Keep it up🙏🏻🙏🏻
A Neutrino walks into a bar,
Bartender : "What can I get for you sir?"
Neutrino : "Nothing, I'm just passing through"
This video made me have fond memories of the ps2 and ps3 music visualizers. Bring it back.
Photons always arrive in quanta and neutrinos always start out and decay from quanta. Makes me wonder if there's a correlation between the two. Also neutrinos are a good candidate for dark matter because they behave the same. And if neutrinos have mass they should loosely clump together and form fast moving filaments.
I am reading new Physics-related articles but haven't heard about that neutrino-vs-antineutrino one. Thank!
"sorry guys, bunch of neutrinos just past my computer, gave me a hard time aiming."
_When your joke unwittingly unleashes a new form of distributed denial of service on the world._
Best channel for people who can not sleep at night. It's just perfect for sleeping.
I'm a simple man: I see something physics-related, I click and like.
6 trillion trillion x force of gravity? Mind blown! Can u prove it?
@@davematkins6829 it's 8
those opening questions were amazing
“What is mind? Doesn’t matter. What is matter? Never mind!! Heheheh 😂”
- Homer Simpson
Can you put links to the different videos referenced in your videos? I enjoy what you publish thank you very much.
Glad to hear Japan is actually working towards understanding neutrino physics, and thus being able to tomographically map the entire interior volume of the Earth.
I'm so thankful you take your time to make these videos
Scientists are also thinking:
Why do men have nipples?
That's because all men are women initially and only within the first few months in pregnancy develop into a man while already having developed nipples, vaginal slit (check under your sack lol) and other good stuff that keeps you in touch with your feminine inside.
And your female genome still persists inside your DNA.
That's why I'm fine with women ruling the world, that's how nature intended it.
@David Smith why am i a guy with 2.5 nipples?
@@kirkhamandy Reading the story of Adam and Eve kinda fucks it up all by itself
@David Smith It's testosterone sabotage and poisoning.
@David Smith no, they are there to stop your chest from fraying
This guy is beyond amazing. Besides his incredible talents and ability to work, he is very funny and a nice person. He accumulated over 600 M views, YT would've paid over 2M bucks for advertisement, he said no, I know better. Crayzee.
Altogether he is an almost perfect human being. Why almost? ... For he is much too good. His conscious mind is so brilliant and supreme to others, that he can go easily blind by important issues, those are not product of the mind and take about 99.99% of what there is. He is the King of the 0.01%, unchallenged.
"Damn Missed it" XD
Part of the reason neutrinos are so damn difficult to observe is that they are almost completely massless and do not react with matter like other particles. This is why so many pass through everything so easily and unnoticed. I will say that I did not know the T2K worked like that, and I think it’s cool you can sort of cause faster than light travel by changing the medium. Gotta love physics.
even captions think he says: hey *42* here
I would have put a paycheck he said 42 here.
It's a deliberate HHGTTG reference.
your graphics special effects team is so talented. bravo.
"Faster than the speed of light" requires some eleboration for an idiot like me.
Had the same question so I looked it up. Seems Cherenkov radiation is about when light travels faster in a medium then it normally should be. In a medium light travels slower.
@@peterstorms3381 Yeah, as I understood it it's why they have all the water there. Because light travels slower in water.
@@mrclint7377 So that means it's not traveling faster than the speed of light, but faster than light does under certain specific circumstances? I have to look this up, it's breaking my brain :D
@@macher001 Yeah, but breaking ones brain in a fun way =)
this is definitely one of my favorite youtube channels
Matter beat up anti-matter and took it's lunch money. That's why there's an imbalance. :)
but mater didn't spend the lunch money that's why there's dark matter
But after that day, the universe was much less WIMPy.
@@Bit-while_going lol
IT IS THE OPPOSITE ANTI-MATTER BEAT UP MATTER
@7:13 when the guy turns around! lmfao "Was that a neutrino?"
Neutrinos? They are three ado from a other dimension who help the Teenage mutant Ninja turtles of course.
I watched every episode of Quantum Leap, and this is great to be watching after it's the final episode
I learned the word Neutrino from Sheldon Cooper.
Simp
same lol
Mans a science legend
THANK YOU!!! Been saying that about bath towels for years!
"Do neutrinos damage my beard?" - Old Hipster in front of mirror believing he's still relevant
I am speechless. The curry reference was magic. I've been meaning to thank you for what you do, I think that it is very important and awfully well done. Cheers from Ferry Den, Scotland.
why do people care if they are "fast" on clicking
They're 10 years old and think they'll get an Xbox achievement if they like first
@@calebg.7034 ive never seen someons describe it better
Typical zoomers
@@ElNegus9985 zoomers? This has been going on before zoomers were born
Big Floppa
There is a neutrino lab in my hometown of Soudan, Minnesota USA. It is the oldest, richest and deepest Iron ore mine in the state. Closing in the 1960s, it was gifted to the state to be preserved. They started doing neutrino lab tests there in the 90s/00s i believe. The University of Minnesota owned it until a couple years ago when a Japanese company bought it; i wonder if this is the same company in the video? Definitely worth a Google.
Ps. You can visit the mine today and actually go a half mile underground to tour the lab and/or the old mine shafts.
When are these stupid scientists going to discover the midoclorianes? I want force power NOW DAMMIT
Havent even watched this and already liked it just for your intelligence and the topic of conversation
"THE STRANGE SCIENCE OF NEUTRINOS"
@Michael Snodgrass II are you drunk
@Michael Snodgrass II the way you commented I meant by that
Gravity exist and it pulls you down.its a force
@Michael Snodgrass II moron? that's you.bumping particle?they are highly unreactive.that went up your head
Thank you for this video. A friend of mine is a scientist who bewildered me with in depth conversation about neutrinos. This video is much closer to my level of comprehension. :)
BIG PP: "Do you want to hear the story about the Neutrino?"
SMALL PP: "Yeah."
BIG PP: "Doesn't matter."
SMALL PP: "No, please tell me."
BIG PP: "😔"
9:30 no I haven’t noticed! Thank you for pointing that out! Lolol
This is a prediction about elementary particles: Mainly only the Down Quarks and Up Quarks make atoms. There are 4 more Quarks which decay into Down Quark and Up Quark in normal conditions. So the high energies inside earth can make two more types of atoms to make hell worlds and hell beings. According to Buddhism there are mainly two groups of hells called Hot hells and Cold hells too. I think definitely there is a very deep level of quantum physics for Ghosts, Gods, Brahma beings etc. According to Quantum Physics our Atoms have two main elementary particles called Up Quark and Down Quark. I think the Mass is a main thing which separate the worlds of living beings. The Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7+0.5; −0.3 MeV/c^2 (The bare mass of the down quark is not well determined, but probably lies between 4.5 and 5.3 MeV/c^2 or Lattice QCD value : 4.79±0.16 MeV/c^2. It Decays into: Stable or Up quark + Electron + Electron antineutrino.). If the standard Down Quark is just a combination of smaller down quarks, and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.467 MeV/c^2 (Around 10 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/10)), and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463 MeV/c^2 (Around 50 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/50)), then maybe those smaller Quarks can make a new type of Atoms which don't require to interact with our Atoms and our elementary particles, and then it can be very difficult for us to discover those smaller Quarks and other smaller elementary particles. The 27km long LHC could discover the 4.7 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 100km long LHC can discover precisely a 0.467 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 500km long LHC can discover a 0.093463 MeV/c^2 particle.
My Mathematical Calculation Of The Prediction:
The Standard Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7 MeV/C^2
The Standard Mass of a Strange Quark: 96 MeV/C^2
The Standard Mass of a Bottom Quark: 4180 MeV/C^2
The mathematical beauty in the elementary particles in the standard model of particle physics:
4180 MeV/C^2 / 96 MeV/C^2 = 43.54166666666667 or around 40
96 MeV/C^2 / 4.7 MeV/C^2 = 20.42553191489362 or around 20
Prediction 1:
4.7 MeV/C^2 / A small Down Quark = around 10
A small Down Quark = 4.7 MeV/C^2 / 10
A small Down Quark = 0.47 MeV/C^2
Prediction 2:
(4.7 MeV/C^2 / 10) / A smaller Down Quark = around 5
A smaller Down Quark = (0.47 MeV/C^2) / 5
A smaller Down Quark = 0.094 MeV/C^2
4180/96 = 43.54166666666667
43.54166666666667 - 40 = 3.541666666666667
3.541666666666667 / 40 = 0.0885416666666667 --- (A)
96/4.7 = 20.42553191489362
20.42553191489362 - 20 = 0.42553191489362
0.42553191489362 / 20 = 0.02127659574468 --- (B)
From (A) and (B)
0.0885416666666667 / 0.021276595744681 = 4.1614583333333
0.02127659574468 / 4.1614583333333 = 0.00511277394615
1 - 0.00511277394615 = 0.99488722605385
4.7 x (0.99488722605385) / 10 = 0.4675969962453 --- (C)
4.7 / 10 = 0.47 --- (D)
From (C) and (D)
0.47 - 0.4675969962453 = 0.0024030037547
0.0024030037547 / 4 = 0.00060075093867
1 - 0.00060075093867335 = 0.9993992490613
0.4675969962453 x (0.9993992490613) / 5 = 0.093463217
The Mass of a smaller Down Quark: 0.093463217 MeV/c^2
Finding a mathematical beauty to guess a precise value:
The Mass of a Down Quark x Spead of light x Spead of light = X (The 'X' is a something like a very high energy.)
0.093463217 x 299 792 458 x 299 792 458 = 8400055030015297 OR around 8400055030000000
Maybe there is a smaller Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463217 MeV/c^2 or 0.09346260470850395 MeV/c^2 for 8400000000000000).
- W. Suresh
@Uncle Bruce, I think the Universe made 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and another 16 elementary particles against the it with the nature of antimatter which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass, charge and spin between shared dimensions with dimensional gaps it caused a tiny unbalance in the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a very small portion of elementary particles (1 from 3000000001).
The early universe was a thing with nothings, so the direction of a nothing (0) thing = +0-0
What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.
Finding The Dimensions In The Universe Mathematically:
According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
The duality of 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: Matter + Antimatter = (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6
(+0-0)^6
= (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism.
Step 1:
i: (+1-(-1))^3 =
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
- W.S. Madusanka
@Uncle Bruce, About what? Scientics discovered this: Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a very small portion of elementary particles (1 from 3000000001).
Wow.. I really didn't know anything about the implication of neutrinos in computing.. Great video!!
Modern science shows its limits when it refuses to explore the idea that the universe is holding itself together consciously, rather than through some mechanical law of physics.
LOL That's not a "limit". The universe doesn't have a "conscience", that is a purely human characteristic.
Love this channel and the fact Thoughty2 gets more views than most Tv progs 🥳
Am am early. The title is " What is a Neutrino"
13th
wow thanks for telling me the title
„The strange science of Neutrinos“ is the title now
74th comment here, it’s now, “What are neutrinos?”
@@kirkhamandy Amazing how patient he is in tinkering this. maybe it makes sense I will try this. seems he changed the title 3 times over the course of 1 hour.
@@nsl_black8053 maybe the strange science of neutrinos doesnt perform as well as the first title
This channel and your mustache are the highlight of my week ❤️
I once complimented a woman's eyebrows by saying she had nice facial hair.
Nice
One of your best videos yet. Easily my favorite. Well done!!!
First
Sliding in that promotion was smooooth!
There is not such thing as 'pure energy' as long as there is 'non-pure energy'. Every energy has a form, so is 'pure' formless? Don't you read too much without getting deep enough? Man, I liked your channel, but first: Czechia is 'eastern Europe', and now 'pure energy' sprung out... and the smirky half-witted chestnutlike comparisons... a smoke screen for riding waves without diving in. I have become and am a troll for you. One sub down. Now. Bye. Be your own Einstein.
Holy shit...i cant recall qhen Ibwas looking up at the skyvwith my boys and explaining to them all this shit. And we were there, lying in the ground, whatching the perseidas....
But life keeps living and...Ibhate those are only memories now. I want all that shit back and have this kind of conversation...
But life, man. Especially in 2020.
The yodel @ 07:34 made me chuckle , cheers
You and Ridddle are two of the best channel I follow.
@Thoughty2 I would totally watch 20min of you answering random trivia like the first two at the start of this video.
I love your nerdy sense of humor.
I can’t tell you how happy I am to come home and see you’ve uploaded. Truly a bright spot in my day.
4:15 living in Alaska, where we don’t get much sun, laughs out loud.
Doesn't matter: solar neutrino flux is essentially the same day and night (ie, whether or not you have earth between you and the sun or not).
ok, am blown away that this video was 3 years ago yet you already mentioned BSOD!
There are more than 4 fundamental forces! What is heat? Mass? Information? Radiation? A force makes something else become similar to it. I enjoy your production quality!
Hello that was a very good and interesting video and I don't know how you're releasing a video everyday but keep it up you're doing amazing. 👍
These videos should be used by the education system to keep kids interested while theyre stuck where ever in lockdown
The best part of Covid 19 is all the thoughty 2 videos
This video is bloody amazing!
Excellent... Informations. Thanks
It's been a year or more since youtube recommended one of your videos to me. Glad to see you're still posting! Nice stache btw, you look like a Victorian detective or something.
Something about antimatter baffles me:
Who says that most of the universe is matter rather than antimatter? If antimatter behaves (mostly) like matter, how do we know about any distant star whether it's made from matter or antimatter? All we have is light. Fusion of hydrogen into helium, for example, will emit the same radiation as fusion of anti-hydrogen into anti-helium, I expect. Absorption of certain wavelengths of light should be the same with atoms as with anti-atoms. And so on...
So we have no way of telling if a star other than Sun is made front antimatter. An evidence against antimatter in our galaxy is the fact that we haven't received a rock from space made from antimatter, which would've caused a spectacular explosion. What about other galaxies? Or if that's too close, what about other clusters of galaxies? As there's no proper exchange between them, matter and antimatter clusters could easily coexist.
Big bang - in the super-dense soup of creating/annihilating of various particles I guess there were areas with more nucleons and areas with more anti-nucleons. As the universe expanded and cooled down, the former formed areas of universe mainly made from matter and the latter those mainly made from antimatter.
So please, Thoughty2, shed some light to why it wouldn't be so. Maybe the background microwave radiation wouldn't be as it is... Maybe ...?
love the curry joke haha brilliant sound affects.
Man, that transition to the ad at the beginning was fantastic.
13:38 made me think of the TOKAMAK plasma things