7 WAYS The SUBARU CROSSTREK Is BETTER Than The HONDA HRV...And 6 WAYS It's WORSE

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 89

  • @dwnshft
    @dwnshft  Рік тому +3

    Special thanks to our Patrons for their support of the channel! Subaru Crosstrek or Honda HRV?

  • @thewilberforce
    @thewilberforce Рік тому +24

    Drove them both. Went over them with a fine tooth comb. The Crosstrek won. And I am really happy with it.

  • @kingkiril
    @kingkiril Рік тому +45

    Subaru crosstrek hands down! I love the ride quality. Easy to park. Better looking in my opinion. Better gas mileage. Visibility. Sport trim on crosstrek is the best. I really got everything I need in my Subaru crosstrek.

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  Рік тому +2

      glad to hear you're liking your car!

    • @HatimMujawah
      @HatimMujawah Рік тому +3

      I am a huge Honda fan but I chose the Crosstrek Sport over the HRV for the same reasons you mentioned. I had waited 2 years for the HRV redesign but was very disappointed by how the exterior of the new generation looks.

    • @turo3066
      @turo3066 Рік тому +2

      ​@@HatimMujawahIn the same boat as you. Bought a 24 Limited and it's a perfect Cinderella vehicle for an active empty nester. The lack of power is overrated. The 2.5 is more than enough.

    • @johnnybgood7812
      @johnnybgood7812 Рік тому

      I’m currently driving a ‘21 Outback which I love but seriously tempted to downsize to the new Crosstrek next year. I think they’ve got the styling just right and, as I no longer need the space of the Outback it’ll be a toss up between that or the ‘25 Forester.

    • @rolin3685
      @rolin3685 9 місяців тому

      Y que tal yo quiero canbiar que tal te fue​@@HatimMujawah

  • @LeePNLB
    @LeePNLB 4 місяці тому +3

    Whenever I see a Suburu drive by I think "that looks great". Then I sit in one and feel like I'm in a tin can.

  • @edisontrent5244
    @edisontrent5244 Рік тому +8

    When winter comes can you do a impreza / crosstrek snow review? Great to have a reviewer in WI! Thanks for the comparison!

  • @nollypra2752
    @nollypra2752 2 місяці тому +2

    Test drove a HRV 2lr hybrid when I was in the UK last month. Absolutely brilliant car, way better than these two!

  • @vinnpu
    @vinnpu Рік тому +26

    I turned down the HR-V for the 2024 Crosstrek. No regrets!

  • @psewgobind
    @psewgobind Місяць тому

    I would give the point to Sudbury fore engine since the HRV has the last K20 engine in Honda's lineup and will probably no longer excise when new version comes out. That blocks and technology is same onsite engine that power the Type-R and the old Acura's from the 90s.

  • @ZeGermanHam
    @ZeGermanHam Рік тому +8

    Standard AWD on the Crosstrek is a HUGE distinction that cannot be understated. And if you option AWD on the HR-V, there are comparison videos on UA-cam that show it being almost comically incompetent off road when comparing to a Crosstrek. Agree that the HR-V has a nicer interior, though.

    • @lauraandrews8319
      @lauraandrews8319 Рік тому +2

      My girlfriend has an HRV, it’s not at home off the pavement. Useless. The Crosstrek is better but the CVT and head gasket issues will stop me from owning one.

    • @tommywagemann9512
      @tommywagemann9512 Рік тому +2

      But I don’t think the hr-v is really marketed as an “off road” vehicle. It’s more for people that loved the civic but need more space and awd. Subarus are known for their rally history and awd capabilities so of course it’ll be better. I feel like I’ve definitely gotten what I’ve paid for with my hr-v. Does just fine in the ice and snow if you’re not off roading. All of my buddies that hunt have trucks or Subarus because they’re always driving through farm land and driving through woods to get to their blind. So it’s definitely up to what your needs are. Also when has Honda ever been known for its awd🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @toyota420xp
      @toyota420xp 6 місяців тому

      I disagree with the interior

    • @stopthebs77
      @stopthebs77 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@emilioagudelo5787 The Crosstrek absolutely destroyed the Rav4 in AWD and especially the snow test. Destroyed!! There is absolutely no contest. This is demonstrated in reviews of the AWD system online on UA-cam Google the head to head snow test. It's comical. The Crosstrek obviously dominates and the Rav4 (TRD model!!) literally overheats, shuts down and won't restart. Whattt??!! Lastly, I can personally attest to the drive experience having owned the Crosstrek and putting it through the ringer where it was just an incredible AWD and overall really comfortable and super functional as an outdoor adventure vehicle. The Rav4, I drove for 6 months, was comically uncomfortable in the driver seat, and the drive quality was genuinely clunky and just rough and top heavy. Soooo, there is no contest!! Good luck out there, friends 😀😀😀

    • @stopthebs77
      @stopthebs77 6 місяців тому +1

      ​@@lauraandrews8319 Subaru completely addressed the head gasket issues as well as oil consumption issues since 2018. Those were early to mid 2010 models and customers have a hard time adjusting in regards to reputation. This comes directly from master techs.

  • @lorenschwiderski
    @lorenschwiderski 8 місяців тому +2

    HR-V has multi-port fuel injection, thus no gunk-up like direct-injection found on CrossTrek. Subaru CrossTrek has the superior always on AWD system, good seating, great safety., and more. The 2.5 engine has a relatively new and complicated TCV -- could have failures down the road, though all cars have possible points of failure, The HR-V is half second slow in 0-60. The CrossTrek is a safe car - look at Death Rates in Cars and Insurance Loss Claims data. Subaru for the win? The HR-V is redesigned, thus too early to tell as to real-world safety, though if you are a crash dummy, the new HR-V will treat you kind --- maybe good for humans too. I think the look, inside and out and that multi-port injection catch my attention. Long lasting? Could be!

  • @Topaz2022
    @Topaz2022 Рік тому +19

    I think the interior in the Crosstrek looks better.

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  Рік тому

      They did do a lot to improve the cabin this year so that’s great to see 👍

    • @Simoncuerrier
      @Simoncuerrier 6 місяців тому +1

      It totally does

  • @jonj77
    @jonj77 Рік тому +4

    So frustrating that we're waiting for Civic and HR-V hybrids in USA. Both have been available for so long in Europe and Aus. Would have been very interested in those vehicles, and getting impatient!

  • @jeffreyfitch1006
    @jeffreyfitch1006 10 місяців тому +3

    All I know is when I want to go offroading..........,
    Actually I don't care about offroading & by extension don't need awd cars ever.

  • @jakeywakey4424
    @jakeywakey4424 Рік тому

    I’m highly considering both vehicles. And im very excited😊

  • @polesitter-qm7hq
    @polesitter-qm7hq Місяць тому

    Tend to keep my cars till the wheels fall off..l think my non turbo hrv will outlast any turbo competitor

  • @Simoncuerrier
    @Simoncuerrier 6 місяців тому

    No no… you need to look at different trims… the Subaru Onyx trim (sports trim in the US) has a very nice interior with stitching etc… I test drove the hrv and Subaru and the hrv felt like a grandma vehicle… compared to the Subaru cross trek Onyx (Sport). I fell in love with the Cross Trek and will be purchasing one this fall.

    • @lynnsterling1651
      @lynnsterling1651 5 місяців тому +1

      hey! I'm a granda and reluctantly giving up my turbo volvo C30. :) trying to decide what to do

  • @tinker1148
    @tinker1148 Рік тому +7

    Crosstrek hands down. You didn’t mention that the new Crosstrek hasn’t been tested yet by IIHS but the previous model was top safety pick plus. Also, the HRV don’t have any USB or center armrest for the rear seat! How can you screw that up in 2023?!

  • @bionicA16
    @bionicA16 Рік тому +7

    i think subaru is more comfortable because the rear suspension is multilink

  • @robertwolf6412
    @robertwolf6412 Рік тому +1

    Wait wait i have a 24 sport do they all come with hill decent? 😊

  • @stereo8893
    @stereo8893 6 місяців тому +2

    If you like boxer engines - hr-v for me

  • @plightn
    @plightn Рік тому +3

    Make a hybrid hrv and we'll revisit :)

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  Рік тому +1

      That’s how I’m feelin

  • @c4snipar
    @c4snipar 8 місяців тому

    Post price paid for a 2024 Subaru Crosstrek premium (before fee if possible)

  • @burningknuckle26
    @burningknuckle26 Місяць тому

    Love both these cars. Subaru is very reliable these days. Went with the HRV tho.

  • @Simoncuerrier
    @Simoncuerrier 6 місяців тому

    No no… you need to look at different trims… the Subaru Onyx trim (sports trim in the US) has a very nice interior with stitching etc… I test drove the hrv and Subaru and the hrv felt like a grandma vehicle… compared to the Subaru cross trek Onyx (Sport). I fell in love with the Cross Trek and will be purchasing one this fall. I found the total opposite… the Subaru was way more responsive… steering etc… Subaru feels WAY better… in every sense

  • @danmcdonald726
    @danmcdonald726 8 місяців тому +1

    They make the HR-V in other countries (ZR-V) in a hybrid it's just not in the states. I just bought an HR-V and I didn't consider Subaru, after owning a '12 WRX there's alot of build quality issues, I liken subaru to Hyundai. One thing I value is interior road noise. I've opted for the EX-L and at 3k miles I'm getting 31mpg average and my commute is about 12mi's so it's not all highway, I think it actually gets better in the city.

  • @debdixon6272
    @debdixon6272 Рік тому +4

    My coworker has a Crosstrek and loves it!

  • @lynellethompson5521
    @lynellethompson5521 Рік тому +1

    Does the HRV have wide track tires like the CR-V?? Hate them!! They are too expensive and the CR-V eats up tires!! CRV's are so hard on tires!! The Subaru is also easier on the knees!! The bumps don't hurt like they do in a CR-V!! I will see how the winter handling is but with the CR-V the redesign lost all winter handling!! After a new CR-V I wouldn't even consider an HR-V. The old CR -V drove like a lumber wagon but it got you through the snow!! If they ever bring back the Element I might consider a Honda again. I've had an Accord and x2 CR-V's. I also hate having the screen up on the dash!! Good thing I switched to a Subaru Crosstrek!!

  • @soundknight
    @soundknight 9 місяців тому

    I like the feeling of a boxer

  • @bryanmchugh1307
    @bryanmchugh1307 Рік тому +1

    I already have a 2018 Crosstrek Limited. It does what it is supposed to do and it does it very well. I would actually take the Honda in this case. The interior is just that much nicer.

  • @carriewilson-k6e
    @carriewilson-k6e 5 місяців тому +1

    But the Crosstrek Wilderness has honeycomb Star Tex water resistant seats etc! Way nicer than the model in this video. Plus, the large infotainment screen is integrated into the dash and not this tablet looking thing that sticks up!

  • @tjj5337
    @tjj5337 Рік тому +1

    Tested them both. I bought the Subaru!

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  Рік тому +2

      Congrats!

    • @tjj5337
      @tjj5337 Рік тому +1

      @@dwnshft Thank you ! Great video. The Honda is too low to the ground for an SUV

  • @toyota420xp
    @toyota420xp 6 місяців тому

    The vehicle that rides the best on bad roads is the Crosstrek and I don't want to drive a slower HRV that cost more has a terrible seat and gets 22 Mi to the gallon in the real world

  • @ELCID612
    @ELCID612 9 місяців тому +1

    It’s a dog bowl not a cup holder 🥲

    • @dwnshft
      @dwnshft  9 місяців тому +1

      I got it right in the Crosstrek wilderness video this year 😅

  • @lorenschwiderski
    @lorenschwiderski 8 місяців тому +2

    HR-V seats hard and thinly padded. Go CrossTrek Premium with base engine, good seats, AWD all the time. Subaru safety!

  • @michaelbell7914
    @michaelbell7914 Рік тому

    Which one has spare tire?

  • @edsmith9855
    @edsmith9855 Рік тому +3

    Cant believe how "slow" the HRV is compared to the stats. It actually has more HP than the base Crosstrek, but is down on torque. It is not really slow, but everybody disses on the Crosstrek base engine, while the HRV is actually a bit slower, with no optional engine. Both are nice though. Personally, I would choose the Crosstrek for at least as much power, better AWD system, and styling. The HRV just looks kind of weird to me.

  • @jdmoney1000
    @jdmoney1000 2 місяці тому

    HRV for the win

  • @henryhenrywang5333
    @henryhenrywang5333 Рік тому

    2024 Subaru crosstrek has Hybrid version.

  • @brucet1043
    @brucet1043 Рік тому +2

    I had a Crosstrek nearly 2 months now.I can say Crosstrek better than Honda HRV.

  • @joellomeli2035
    @joellomeli2035 Рік тому +1

    I am impressed with the Cross Trek numbers. My only question is, why do they make them to ugly. This cross over has everything to Excell the HRV, however, it looks to outdated. I wouldn't drive one.

  • @lauraandrews8319
    @lauraandrews8319 Рік тому

    Both of these vehicles have CVT transmissions that are not up to the task. And what is worse, Honda can’t even fix them. I know this from first hand experience, The CVT in my HRV went out at 23,000 miles, and it took the dealership 6 months to fix it. Total garbage, do yourself a favor, get a Toyota.

    • @OsBMXandHotrods
      @OsBMXandHotrods 11 місяців тому +1

      The corolla cross has a cvt also. :-(

    • @lauraandrews8319
      @lauraandrews8319 11 місяців тому +1

      @@OsBMXandHotrodsAt least Toyota knows how to build a CVT, but I still don't want one.

  • @lucastherexcat
    @lucastherexcat Рік тому +1

    Both cars have CVTs, dependability is important, CVTs are junk. Fan boys will say that CVTs last as long as regular automatic (they don't), they won't mention they cost double to fix. Do not drink the CVT kool-aid .

    • @vinnpu
      @vinnpu Рік тому +2

      Now drive my second vehicle with a cvt. Never had a problem and I like the smooth performance. To each their own.

    • @turo3066
      @turo3066 Рік тому +1

      CVTs have come a long way. There are plenty out there with over 200k miles even shitty ones like from Nissan. CVTs are probably more sensitive to lack of maintenance though.

    • @lucastherexcat
      @lucastherexcat Рік тому

      @@turo3066 After looking at Auto trader it seems that new Crosstreks are available with standard trannies, who knew?

    • @lucastherexcat
      @lucastherexcat Рік тому

      Overall CVT failure rate is higher that conventional automatics. They cost twice as much to repair. No reason to own a CVT.@@turo3066

    • @tommywagemann9512
      @tommywagemann9512 Рік тому +1

      @@turo3066yes this exactly. You absolutely NEED to change the trans fluid at least every 20k miles. And I wouldn’t keep a cvt over 125k miles just to be safe. At 125k miles most cvt’s will start shifting harder or slipping and then it’ll be much harder to resell or trade in

  • @proflex310
    @proflex310 Рік тому +6

    US HRV design is ugly as hell !

  • @abbasahmadi8689
    @abbasahmadi8689 Рік тому

    Honda

  • @deanmichael1279
    @deanmichael1279 10 місяців тому +1

    I am 1000% not kidding when I say you couldn’t pay me to own a Subaru. If Subaru contacted me and offered me a car. I am not kidding when I say I would turn it down.

  • @knightryder3757
    @knightryder3757 Рік тому

    Thanks for your opinions. Lol

  • @Emiliolilith01
    @Emiliolilith01 4 місяці тому

    Hrv better!

  • @hesham3326
    @hesham3326 10 місяців тому

    .
    ⚫🦢⚫ HR-V ⚫🦢⚫
    . 👁️🗿👁️ 🏁 .
    . 🕳️ 🏆 🕺🏻 .

  • @Noname0670
    @Noname0670 11 місяців тому +2

    The HRV looks way better. The Subaru is ugly.