Mind Bugs | Mahzarin R. Banaji | TEDxBari

Social psychologist Mahzarin Banaji has been inquiring the disparities between our conscious values and our unconscious attitudes, discovering that our good intentions and our effective behavior​ are often as different as they can be. In this TEDx talk, ​she uses her famous psychological tool - the Implicit Attitude Test - to expose the hidden biases of a whole theatre. ​ Mahzarin R. Banaji is a social psychologist teaching at Harvard University. She studies the disparities between conscious expressions of values, attitudes and beliefs on the one hand, and less conscious, implicit representations of mental content. In 2016 she was granted the William James Fellow Award for her outstanding contributions to psychology. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx

[@LowlyFilmVlogs]

...how are y'all not going to show the face. I'm literally watching this for a class and YOU'RE NOT GOING TO SHOW THE FACE

[@milspec_tube]

I think the person operating the camera has eyes that are close together. :D

[@magdalenamagdalena1550]

Yeah lol but maybe it was done on purpose. Who knows.

[@barbarabinder352]

You should be showing the face during the experiment!

[@sboloshis1188]

Should fire the cameraman. What a waste of time.

[@DrThomasWay]

Horribly directed video. Why all the wide shots of the audience when what is going on is on stage or on the screen?

[@shark3x]

Why would they not film the face? Poor camera work.

[@MyDogIsYoshi]

@Diogenes TheDog It wouldn't be the operator's fault. It's the director. Fire the director!

[@synesthesiafilms]

@@MyDogIsYoshi Fire them all!

[@MyDogIsYoshi]

This is the only TEDxTalk that I've watched and disliked. She tells the audience what the intended result is. The camera director did an awful job for what should be an interactive video.

[@joshuasaetern8069]

I found it weird how she told us what we were going to feel during the experiment before the "experiment" began. Why not ask the audience to take note of how they feel with certain eye positions & take a poll of intelligent or lack of intelligence after the video finishes playing.

[@yudk8418]

Nice presentation! Yes the work actually begins first with being honest with oneself then being brave enough to start the peeling process ... facing and removing the layers that support such biases .... some will continue and others will run

[@stephaniemilton7999]

Thanks

[@justinrangel2289]

Couldn’t see the face :(

[@emilydowepa-c8975]

We didn’t see the face??? Who recorded this 🤦‍♀️

[@mm89916]

Very great

[@wnovo3668]

It doesn't show the face???

[@bobbychen5642]

Classic scientific ideology.

[@1ADScout]

Feels like the video is designed to be complained about.

[@tomg3001]

This one didn't impress me. Bad filming, I felt it to be a huge distraction. Oh well, maybe next time!

[@hansdybka1331]

Outsmaring ourselves requires effort and intelligence ...of which the majority of us are incapable of doing...and so can we at the same time eliminate our competitive nature?...people need motivation...because if no one has motivation...where will new ideas come from...the old scholars were the idyle rich...are there any poor philosophers or others?

[@antonellatropiano3761]

Implicit ASSOCIATION test

[@chadder5205]

kay

[@chasebrauns6030]

Camera man should be fired.

[@JHTRealEstateSA]

I liked this video.. but the like is for Dr. Banaji.... Disappointing camera work.

[@mermaidqueen9881]

Seriously, we cannot see the face during the experiment, WTF

[@navthemammon2704]

Wtf camera guy

[@VladyslavKL]

🐋

[@SageLegacy]

awfully directed ted talk. Didn't show the face and is disregarding their talking point.