Fission & Fusion - GCSE & A-level Physics (full version)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
  • scienceshorts.net Hey, don't listen to this guy! He says that you DIVIDE by 1.6x10-19 to get from eV to J. What an idiot!
    Please don't forget to leave a like if you found this helpful!
    ---------------------------------------
    00:00 Fission & nuclear reactors
    06:15 Fusion -
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I don't charge anyone to watch my videos, so please donate if you can to keep me going! bit.ly/scienceshortsdonate

КОМЕНТАРІ • 53

  • @lallib.3968
    @lallib.3968 5 років тому +24

    I love these videos- got an a level exam today. Using these as a quick and easy way to get information into my brain without panicking.

  • @benkaye5014
    @benkaye5014 6 років тому +52

    Uranium-238 is fissionable but not fissile meaning it can't sustain a chain reaction but can be induced to fission. Uranium-235 is fissile and is the fuel required for a nuclear power station to work.

    • @wrath8704
      @wrath8704 5 років тому +5

      Uranium 238 requires exposure to high energy neutrons to fission

    • @simper4951
      @simper4951 5 років тому +3

      yeah, I was confused about that, I think what happens when a neutron hits a U-238 atom is that it turns into P-239 (plutonium)

    • @soadj28
      @soadj28 4 роки тому

      It takes a lot of energy, that's how three stage hydrogen bombs work.

    • @medievalterrence9691
      @medievalterrence9691 4 роки тому +1

      I wanted to say that myself. Happy to see someone beat me to it!

    • @yo0brum214
      @yo0brum214 2 роки тому

      Did anyone ask and is it really important, no. So just stfu and appreciate the vid and stop tryna display your intelligence

  • @raltzia4420
    @raltzia4420 4 роки тому +39

    imagine doing your GCSEs
    pfft
    (it’s a joke)
    hopefully my estimated grades are good
    at least i don’t need to remember every macbeth quote

    • @uzzy_787
      @uzzy_787 3 роки тому

      how were they?

    • @billylardner
      @billylardner 3 роки тому +5

      @@raltzia4420 think he was asking about how your estimated grades were

    • @sounad3736
      @sounad3736 2 роки тому

      @@billylardner haha exactly!

  • @imogenfrancis4713
    @imogenfrancis4713 6 років тому +17

    These videos are so concise and explained well - they are really helping my alevel revision, thank you for uploading them!

    • @TheB1gYC
      @TheB1gYC 9 днів тому

      No worries glad u liked it!

  • @TOXICRAVEN123
    @TOXICRAVEN123 4 роки тому +1

    Ive got Jan mocks (2020) coming up, thanks for all the videos

  • @xhejsonxhaferaj5390
    @xhejsonxhaferaj5390 4 роки тому +2

    thnx i found this really helpful for my next physics exam :)

  • @dasarikumar3486
    @dasarikumar3486 6 років тому +1

    Nicely explained.

  • @mrsalden8652
    @mrsalden8652 4 роки тому +3

    great video, so helpful!

  • @tjsmith8318
    @tjsmith8318 5 років тому

    Thankyou so much learnt more than with my teacher. Very good explanation

  • @ScribbleDribble
    @ScribbleDribble 7 років тому +6

    Much appreciated.

  • @magn8195
    @magn8195 7 років тому +1

    Great Video!

  • @fahimal-huq6867
    @fahimal-huq6867 5 років тому

    Thanks a lot sir.

  • @TN_HondaDad
    @TN_HondaDad 4 роки тому +2

    Great video but it has spawned a 100 questions I have!

  • @harrycalvert6468
    @harrycalvert6468 5 років тому +1

    How come the neutrons aren’t absorbed by the atoms in the coolant or moderator?

  • @flyingdutchman109
    @flyingdutchman109 6 років тому +67

    energy 'made' smh XD

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  5 років тому +108

      Ohhh get a life. Energy isn't a physical thing, only a concept. To say that "kinetic energy is made" is no less correct than saying "an object's kinetic energy increases". The only thing that matters is how it related to the values.

    • @rahmatalikhan9510
      @rahmatalikhan9510 5 років тому

      @@ScienceShorts z hi

    • @h0197
      @h0197 5 років тому +1

      what is the joke - energy cannot be created?

    • @matthewkendall8592
      @matthewkendall8592 5 років тому +4

      @@h0197 Yes it can only be harnessed

    • @Cowmilker98
      @Cowmilker98 4 роки тому +3

      @@matthewkendall8592 Hmm I think you mean that it can only be transferred from one type to another. 'Harnessed' implies the opposite of 'wasted', which it certainly can be!

  • @Perpetual-motivation
    @Perpetual-motivation 2 роки тому +1

    What you are describing at 4:58, is that what happened at Chernobyl?

  • @jayboore3982
    @jayboore3982 3 роки тому

    The particles electrons are charged causing cells to be disrupted causing coma hypnotic state

  • @eagle1341
    @eagle1341 Рік тому +1

    So...is a fart considered fusion or fission?
    (Assuming all particles behave as ideal gas in your answer)
    (Marks will be awarded for writing answer clearly and concisely)

  • @matthewpolydor6094
    @matthewpolydor6094 2 роки тому +1

    Hi , i really like the videos, very helpful ,but please can you make a video to explain fundamental particles(flavours,quarks etc), thank you sir

  • @the_hasnat
    @the_hasnat 3 роки тому

    Why use water that has a boiling point of 100C when you can use ethanol with a lower bp. Wouldn't that save more energy??
    (I know alcohol is flammable.)

  • @divyanshjain766
    @divyanshjain766 2 роки тому +1

    Can you also please make a video on the differences between high, intermediate and low-level waste?

  • @ashiedee496
    @ashiedee496 4 роки тому +1

    couldn't have said it better tbh :)

  • @kaisharyislam8103
    @kaisharyislam8103 6 років тому +1

    How can fuel rods be used up if there are still uranium left? Isn't it the uranium itself causing the reaction in the rod?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  6 років тому +8

      +Kaishary Islam Because there is not enough uranium left to cause enough fission for a chain reaction.

    • @wrath8704
      @wrath8704 5 років тому +5

      If mass of fissionable material falls below critical mass chain reaction cannot be sustained (critical mass is minimum mass of fissionable material required to start and sustain a chain reaction)

    • @peterwilde4494
      @peterwilde4494 2 роки тому +2

      I guess you don't care anymore but for anyone else reading this... The other reason for fuel rods still containing uranium being 'used up' is that the fission products produced can be good neutron absorbers themselves and this reduces the number of neutrons available for fission. Chemically removing them can make the fuel viable again. It is processes like this that are referred to as fuel reprocessing. An analogy for this might be the 'poisoning' of a catalyst in chemistry.

  • @fuzzylumpkin8030
    @fuzzylumpkin8030 3 роки тому

    Why does fusion work against the strong nuclear force

  • @kademate6888
    @kademate6888 4 роки тому +2

    uranium 238 cannot sustain a chain reaction*

  • @iconichisoka7642
    @iconichisoka7642 3 роки тому +1

    this tutirial ate ms maam

  • @divyanshjain766
    @divyanshjain766 2 роки тому

    Can you please make a video of this chapter on what are the problems of storing radioactive waste?

  • @dewmithwaranasooriya4342
    @dewmithwaranasooriya4342 2 роки тому

    8:35 you meant to say two deutrium nuclei isn't?

    • @user-ji8br3dl9s
      @user-ji8br3dl9s Рік тому

      Heavy hydrogen and deuterium are the same thing

  • @jazzowen2640
    @jazzowen2640 2 роки тому +1

    Have a test in 50 mins !

  • @hyronomusprice5439
    @hyronomusprice5439 4 роки тому

    Here's a new concept, if everything is permitted by fusion of Fire and Darkness, then by reflection of symmetrical magnetic fields there is a quantum leap by De Broglie's wave transformation and Fourier dimension series.