Nuclear Reactions, Radioactivity, Fission and Fusion

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 630

  • @emmettgriner6345
    @emmettgriner6345 4 роки тому +1084

    I am a 66-year old retired accountant trying to fill the gaps in my knowledge of basic science. For my purpose, your videos are head and shoulders above everything else on UA-cam: Clear, Concise, and Complete. Many thanks. I won't say "Please keep up the good work" because I already know you will.

    • @AAG414
      @AAG414 3 роки тому +39

      this science is hardly "basic." this is well above basic

    • @dsk3401
      @dsk3401 3 роки тому +22

      @@AAG414 not that hard to understand though

    • @firstlawgaming2680
      @firstlawgaming2680 3 роки тому +14

      @@AAG414 No its basic

    • @JC-lu4se
      @JC-lu4se 3 роки тому +8

      @@firstlawgaming2680 You need a reference point for that statement. Grade 1 high school?

    • @mercifulserventurdu1753
      @mercifulserventurdu1753 3 роки тому +8

      Wow motivation for me because im 19 and dont give attentiin towards my studies 😂🥺🥺

  • @ConfidenceinChrist90
    @ConfidenceinChrist90 4 роки тому +358

    I'm a physics and chemistry teacher and I be watching your videos to help explain things to my students. Thank you!

    • @footrot17
      @footrot17 4 роки тому +21

      I hope your not teaching your students to speak like that. You contribute to the dumbing down of humanity.

    • @racquelcarter3538
      @racquelcarter3538 4 роки тому

      Can you help me?

    • @MrsNoble2007
      @MrsNoble2007 4 роки тому +73

      @@footrot17 maybe check your own spelling before hitting "send" on those judgmental comments of yours! 🙄 *YOU'RE* hilarious

    • @wh00lio
      @wh00lio 4 роки тому +1

      @@MrsNoble2007 nigga, dont let me yo ass

    • @pigeonlove
      @pigeonlove 4 роки тому +3

      @@wh00lio 🐫💩

  • @thelastcrow5660
    @thelastcrow5660 11 місяців тому +18

    I'm sure you get comments like this all the time, but damn dude, you're awesome! This 14 min video offered a way better explanation than an entire semester of radioactivity courses and seminars. Thank you.

  • @kaine4123
    @kaine4123 6 років тому +389

    This was a good video. I can't express how satisfied I am by it. You covered everything my Professor took two weeks to explain in 14 minutes.

  • @dominicj7977
    @dominicj7977 7 років тому +86

    I had forgot everything I learned as soon as I passed out from highschool, despite having aced in the exams. By the time I finished engineering, highschool chemistry was like an unknown language to me.A couple of minutes on your videos and everything just came back to place.
    I still refer your videos instead of old textbooks. Thanx a lot.

  • @tanishadaharwal9386
    @tanishadaharwal9386 6 років тому +155

    I never knew someone could be this good at teaching, explaining creating content👍
    *You really set the standards high*

    • @OkKhaos
      @OkKhaos 4 роки тому +1

      He's dogshit at explaining and creating content. He's reading stuff he doesn't understand and doesn't go shit into detail. He's one of the worst teachers ever and this video is very boring.

    • @TheFirstNamelessOne
      @TheFirstNamelessOne 4 роки тому

      @@OkKhaos Mind to tell me why?

    • @OkKhaos
      @OkKhaos 4 роки тому

      @@TheFirstNamelessOne I did. Read again!

    • @TheFirstNamelessOne
      @TheFirstNamelessOne 4 роки тому +1

      @@OkKhaos You're right! But please do not expect anything big from a minute video. Read books, magazines in order to understand this video is mostly a recap.

    • @aryanayush136
      @aryanayush136 4 роки тому +3

      OkKhaos he isn’t going into details because he is explaining the base. And what are you saying he knows nothing about science he is a science communicator of course he must know his stuff

  • @NEnigma777
    @NEnigma777 Рік тому +9

    You explain things so much simpler than my professors. I’m so thankful I found your channel!

  • @gibransaliba8801
    @gibransaliba8801 8 років тому +82

    Made me love chemistry even more. Keep rockin Doc

  • @insanetea4065
    @insanetea4065 3 роки тому +7

    I’m a computer science student but I just find this really interesting. Way cooler than sitting in front of a screen programming all day

  • @ecozeek363
    @ecozeek363 5 років тому +12

    Great video. This explains exactly what our NGSS STEM Chem students need for a review of concepts in nuclear changes. Thank you!

  • @peterpetrovsky9989
    @peterpetrovsky9989 Рік тому +11

    Now I am ready for an Openheimer

  • @Mackfilmz
    @Mackfilmz Місяць тому +1

    Professor Dave always coming in clutch before my exams 😂 I felt way more confident about my last biology test too. Thank you, Professor Dave!

  • @tapk1995
    @tapk1995 10 місяців тому +1

    I am 55 yrs who hated organic chemistry because probably teacher bored us to death in classroom. Yet we had few genius who were very good. Those days periodic table had less elements & there were only 4 particles. But ur videos are so interesting that it takes me back to my school days. Engineering for me was far more easy as I understood. If u were my teacher and I was 14 yrs, definitely would have taken up chemistry. Thanks and May god bless u

  • @davidjohansson7646
    @davidjohansson7646 2 роки тому +7

    I am happy I understand decay mechanics better now. It aided me to understand geological dating processes in a more complete manner. Thank you so much!

  • @mariakhan6090
    @mariakhan6090 4 роки тому +12

    Thank you professor Dave! These videos are perfectly concise, I didn't get the concept fully when my teacher taught this, but now it's all clear

  • @iamthemouse4483
    @iamthemouse4483 3 роки тому +2

    I wish I valued your channel more back in high school. Your videos really help to give me a better understanding of science.

  • @sciencelearnremember
    @sciencelearnremember 7 років тому +14

    I like how you relate the topic to visuals and real examples so I can remember it easier.

  • @abhyuday1294
    @abhyuday1294 6 років тому +7

    No words to explain you ......why u haven't a nobel in teaching.....such a great personality

    • @OkKhaos
      @OkKhaos 4 роки тому

      You are an idiot. He's un-engaging, boring, and can't teach. He can't remember anything, can't you see him reading off of something behind the camera. There isn't any eye contact and you can see his eyes move back and forth as he reads. He's a terrible teacher, and this is one of the worst videos I have ever seen. He doesn't even have a personality. His voice monotone the entire time and he's not even good at public speaking.

  • @viallymboma9874
    @viallymboma9874 2 роки тому +1

    I have been watching documentary about quantum and particle physics and didn't really understand everything cuz everything was explained at higher level...but this video broke everything down for me and now I understand why nuclear reaction happens and it make real sense...thanks for this video...tho old, it still gold for understanding basic knowledge

  • @cgaccount3669
    @cgaccount3669 7 років тому +1

    Why have I never encountered a teacher that would give a quick summary like this before getting into the details ? It's so much more interesting to know the point of a lecture before getting deep into the details. In school it's just present the details as dull as you can. Memorization is the focus rather than understanding

  • @belgiumball2308
    @belgiumball2308 4 роки тому +16

    0:58
    Flat earthers: *hey dont forget about us we use it to explain literally everything*

  • @anonymous.youtuber
    @anonymous.youtuber 2 роки тому +11

    The clarity of Dave’s explanation is stunning. 🙏🏻👍

  • @MelNuesch
    @MelNuesch 8 років тому +22

    I watched all the playlist! Your videos rock, they explain everything in a couple of minutes! Congratulations and thank you so much! Keep doing them! Greetings from Uruguay, South America :)

  • @unsaali4201
    @unsaali4201 2 роки тому +1

    His intro makes me happy in a way that I can't explain

  • @blackdragonwave9415
    @blackdragonwave9415 3 роки тому +7

    Great and accessible video! One small caveat to keep in mind: the mass of a neutron is not exactly the mass of a proton + the mass of an electron . The masses of a neutron/proton/electron are 939.566 MeV/c2, 938.272 MeV/c2, and 0.511 MeV/c2 respectively, which leaves 0.783 MeV for kinetic energy. In case anyone caught it, the process of positive beta emission actually generates mass, which is why it can only happen inside a nucleus under certain conditions, whereas regular beta decay can and does happen with free neutrons. Conservation of mass isn't a fundamental law of physics.

  • @timothedenys8894
    @timothedenys8894 4 роки тому +3

    Love your video, and your way of explaining things (special mention for A and Z, number of mass/charge, crystal clear).
    Plus, cross-references to chemistry, and deeper, to biology, immediately give a good impression.
    I just found one mistake that could be harmful:
    8:12 - neutron "is heavier by *exactly* the mass of the electron" is completely false: if we count in MeV/c², which is the standard in particle physics (people even omit the "/c²" and just say: ) neutron is (roughly) 939.6 MeV. On the other hand, proton is 938.3 MeV, and electron is just 0.511 MeV. Then adding proton mass and electron mass together is still 0.8 MeV away from neutron mass. It's even worse when we consider proton decay (that does *not* exist outside of a nucleus), where proton is still 938.3 MeV and neutron+positron is 940.111 MeV: there is 1.8 MeV appearing from we-don't-know-where (actually we do: it's coming from the other particles of the nucleus wherein lays the "decaying" proton).
    Speaking short, beta-decays and mass studies both are absurdly fascinating subjects, awfully more complex than just a sum of mass and an equation.
    It's been 4 years already, and this message could be totally pointless. But, well, to anyone who wants it :)

  • @Jim54_
    @Jim54_ 3 роки тому +8

    Humanity’s rejection of Nuclear power was a massive mistake, and the environment has payed dearly for it as we continue to rely on fossil fuels for our electricity

    • @JessB009
      @JessB009 4 місяці тому

      Solar panels do exist which is a huge improvement. Coal and steam powered energy is also an option but dangerous for different reason. Utilizing solar was one of the best creations thus far. We should switch and stay innovative I believe we can do it as long as we avoid voting in unqualified and uneducated politicians that don’t believe global warming exists.

  • @vaibhavnmete
    @vaibhavnmete 5 років тому +8

    One of the best explanations about physics I ever seen, good going sir.

  • @jasonchu212
    @jasonchu212 2 роки тому

    OMG i just left some messages at other videos complimenting at theri lucidness. And this video just totally blew my mind. I am so grateful for your video. Thank you so much!

  • @prafulkatare4385
    @prafulkatare4385 6 років тому +5

    You made it so simple, thank you for that.

  • @tessa7780
    @tessa7780 4 роки тому +5

    this is a lifesaver in virtual learning. you're teaching me everything i wasn't able to learn through a zoom. thank you so much

  • @meenakshideepthi3902
    @meenakshideepthi3902 Рік тому +1

    You're videos help me a lot while trying to learn new things where I don't have to worry about learning basics 'cuz your videos are so deductive and are like keys to my preparations. Thank you so much Dave sir.

  • @lsavic
    @lsavic 8 років тому +2

    Helped a lot with starting the topic of radioactivity and the test coming up thanks :)

  • @jeromemalenfant6622
    @jeromemalenfant6622 2 роки тому +1

    14:11 Beta decay is the reaction n -> p + e^- + antineutrino. For this to happen the mass of the neutron must be more than one electron mass greater than the proton; it's actually about 2.5 electron masses greater. If it was exactly one electron mass greater it could not beta decay since it needs some energy left over for the kinetic energy of the electron and antineutrino.
    And the statement that a neutron 'is a proton and an electron combined' is wrong. The electron (like the antineutrino emitted in the decay) is created in the decay; it did not exist beforehand. Neutrons consist of one up quark and two down quarks; protons consist of two up quarks and one down quark. Electrons are not made up of quarks.

  • @DanielGalan
    @DanielGalan 2 роки тому

    I subscribed. You explained it so well, combined the Phisics and the Chemistry sides in one video. It's so clear to me now. Thank you.

  • @RWL_Channel
    @RWL_Channel 8 років тому +6

    You helped me pass a ap Chem test thanks

  • @shossainimam
    @shossainimam 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for your excellent video,though I had studied in collage four decades ago but still keep in touch with matters connected with nuclear science,your lecture was like a refresher course and beautifully presented.Thanks again.

  • @parthbhuva650
    @parthbhuva650 3 роки тому +1

    The world needs professors like you.👍

  • @sirijanthakur
    @sirijanthakur 2 роки тому +1

    Guts of the chemist working to discover Radiation with uranium lol, still managed to pop it off without any gear

  • @Smeltzz
    @Smeltzz 9 років тому +4

    these videos helped me with my Final sooooo much. omg i wish there were more

  • @paolarosado8348
    @paolarosado8348 6 років тому +3

    You are an angel! Thank you so much. You truly explain the root of why things happen in the first place. Keep up!

  • @medicaldoctor8983
    @medicaldoctor8983 5 років тому +12

    Hey,Professor Dave. Thanks for your simplicit lectures and they help me alot.I have recommended this channel to many others. I have one question in my mind.
    "What happens with the electrons of the atoms during any nuclear decay? Can positron emitted from nucleus collide with shell electron and get annihilated along with the electron releasing gamma rays?Will alpha particle take two electrons along with two protons? Can Beta particle(electron from nucleus) knock out shell electron during its emissions?
    Plz answer this I'll be thankful.
    I posted this question here because I know Professor Dave and his intellectual subscribers can only answer this.

    • @ridinggambit5017
      @ridinggambit5017 4 роки тому +1

      Hi, yes a positron emitted from the nucleus will definitely at some point encounter an electron and undergo annihilation emitting two gamma rays in addition to ionising that atom. But with regards to your second question, an alpha particle does not take electrons with it when it exits the nucleus, but when it encounters another atom it can rip electrons from that atom causing a normal chemical ionisation of that atom.

    • @medicaldoctor8983
      @medicaldoctor8983 4 роки тому +1

      @@ridinggambit5017 Thanks for the answer
      But why alpha particles not take electrons from their parent atom while emitting from its nucleus?

    • @ridinggambit5017
      @ridinggambit5017 4 роки тому +1

      @@medicaldoctor8983 I'm not sure, the academic papers just say that overall electric charge is conserved during alpha decay.

    • @medicaldoctor8983
      @medicaldoctor8983 4 роки тому +1

      @@ridinggambit5017 It would be interesting to do a research on that
      But thats not my field 😢😢

    • @Fomites
      @Fomites 2 роки тому

      Good set of questions!

  • @gabriels2395
    @gabriels2395 6 років тому +4

    Hello professor! Thank you very much for the videos!!
    At 8:35 the positron emission is said to come from a proton becoming a neutron and expelling this positron (of negligible mass).
    I can't just think how can something become something of greater mass (even just a little greater) and on top of that expel another particle.
    Most likely more particles are involved so when I check the physics Playlist I will find out!
    Thanks again!!

    • @qwaeszrdxtfcgvbqwaeszrdxtf5733
      @qwaeszrdxtfcgvbqwaeszrdxtf5733 3 роки тому

      Mass of the nucleus is different than the sum of the protons and neutrons which make it.It enables total mass of the nucleus to decrease after beta plus emission.

  • @emilyhesterman5340
    @emilyhesterman5340 6 років тому +1

    Professor Dave you are seriously the best. You are the reason I am passing chem 2

  • @sadiarahman0010
    @sadiarahman0010 5 років тому +2

    OMG ur explanations literally answered all of my questions ❤️❤️❤️

  • @DaFratRat
    @DaFratRat 8 років тому +17

    Positron and Electron: Weigh the Same - opposite forces
    Neutron weighs more than Proton
    Neutron loses electron -> Becomes proton (lighter)
    Proton loses positron -> Becomes neutron (heavier)
    How does a proton lose something but become heavier?

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  8 років тому +12

      +Donovan Patar something about the properties of the positron! very strange stuff, you know.

    • @hazratullahhisham
      @hazratullahhisham 8 років тому +3

      Donovan Patar
      Neutron emits antineutrino and loses electron becomes lighter proton..
      Proton emits neutrino and positron. stay the same but to a lesser extent lose some weight as it was before because positron is too small as compare to electron but just loses positive sign.

    • @harrrisgaming
      @harrrisgaming 5 років тому +2

      @@ProfessorDaveExplains I think it is because losing positron is the same as gaining electron, just my theory

    • @WilliamCacilhas
      @WilliamCacilhas 4 роки тому +5

      harisgaming it’s because of what’s happening inside the nucleons. A proton consist of two up quarks and a down quark. Up quarks have 2/3 charge and down quarks have -1/3 charge. Adding them together and you see where the proton gets it’s positive charge from. Up quarks have less mass than down quarks. A neutron is composed of one up quark and two down quarks. So adding the charges you get 0. When a proton decays into an neutron it releases a W+ boson which decays into a positron neutrino pair. What is happening inside the proton is that one of its quarks is sending out 1 positron worth of charge which changes it into a down quark (2/3-1=-1/3). Since down quarks have more mass the nucleon has gained mass. It’s something to note that the gained mass comes from the quarks interaction with the Higgs field since down quarks more strongly interact with it. It didn’t just come from nothing. At least that’s my understanding of it.

    • @karolsobczuk9894
      @karolsobczuk9894 11 місяців тому

      ​@@WilliamCacilhas I've logged in just to write you a big thank you man. I was looking for a proper answer for that question in comments, but most of it is just "buttlicking" . Thanks for making it clear, or at least as clear as you understand it.

  • @lexiu6036
    @lexiu6036 5 місяців тому

    8:11 idk if someone has pointed that out before, but that's simply not true. the difference between neutron's and proton's masses (~1.3 MeV/c^2) is bigger than the mass of an electron (~0.5 MeV/c^2).

  • @matthiasberndt7897
    @matthiasberndt7897 5 років тому +1

    Mistake at 11:00.
    2H (aka Deuterium) does not decay. The only radioactive isotope of Hydrogen is 3H, aka Tritium.

    • @EddyPrice
      @EddyPrice 3 роки тому

      Yes, this bothered me too. He is talking about radioactive elements in your body, but all the isotopes shown on the screen there are stable! 14C is the radioactive one, as is 15O, and as you note, 3H.
      Otherwise, loved the video.

  • @Nexus2Eden
    @Nexus2Eden 9 років тому +7

    Love your videos ... Please keep making them!

  • @nirupamam2814
    @nirupamam2814 6 років тому

    All of your videos are verrrrrry good....You are the best teacher ever...

  • @SeanKelly-the-nutjob
    @SeanKelly-the-nutjob 2 роки тому +1

    Really nice explainer! Thank you!
    Just one quibble: at the 3 minute mark, the symbol on screen for beta is a German eszett, ß, which isn’t actually a Greek beta, β. They’re close, though!

  • @xiongerbuku
    @xiongerbuku Місяць тому +1

    A good video. Love from China.

  • @user-jc2ez6ig5z
    @user-jc2ez6ig5z 5 років тому +2

    You're the best man.
    I wish you taught a nuclear engineering course

  • @rueynenho8860
    @rueynenho8860 4 роки тому +1

    Can someone explain at 8:17, he mentioned that the mass of a neutron weighs higher than a proton by exactly the mass of an electron, that means 1.008664u - 1.007276u = 0.001388u which doesnt give the numerical value of 9.11x10^-31 kg when converted to kilograms?

  • @maeb4990
    @maeb4990 3 роки тому

    I've learned that I like necular physics and learning about radiation. Thank you for this video.

  • @rodemermanaba8821
    @rodemermanaba8821 7 років тому +1

    Hi im Rodemer from Philippines i watched this video your video expalin everything that makes me have an idea that have to do my assignment so thank you to this video Keeping doing Sir i salute you

  • @jmaried.9642
    @jmaried.9642 8 років тому +9

    Love your video, it's very comprehensible to newbies like me! :D Thanks!

  • @tomaffatigato1498
    @tomaffatigato1498 3 роки тому

    This is a very special video. Clear, thorough and concise...and bookmarked

  • @salaa23
    @salaa23 5 років тому +15

    10:19 Hotel? Trivago

  • @abdullahjaved2832
    @abdullahjaved2832 4 роки тому +2

    Bro you are a very good person...♥️♥️♥️

  • @ridinggambit5017
    @ridinggambit5017 4 роки тому +3

    I feel this could benefit from explaining the gamma radiation that occurs that from the positron electron annihilation in B+ decay. Otherwise a good lecture.

  • @keitos18
    @keitos18 3 роки тому

    Watched many videos on related to this and this has been my fav so far. Big and small pov really helped! Thanks professor Dave Explains.

  • @michellesullano2069
    @michellesullano2069 7 років тому

    I like how you relate the topic to visuals and real examples so I can remember it easier. THANK YOU!!

  • @michaelviti5091
    @michaelviti5091 9 місяців тому

    Dave, this was such an excellent video. Thank you SO much!

  • @sunahangrai3601
    @sunahangrai3601 4 місяці тому

    professor dave delivers insightful lectures

  • @FinBoyXD
    @FinBoyXD 4 роки тому

    When he said "let's check comprehension" and it looked hard I thought I have no idea. But then I proceeded to get them right. Cool video.

  • @Kampamba-ib9zg
    @Kampamba-ib9zg 5 місяців тому +1

    Thanks sir 🎉🎉🎉

  • @pjak1minecraft
    @pjak1minecraft 5 років тому

    Best video that I have seen regarding this topic. Thumbs up!

  • @jeffharrison1090
    @jeffharrison1090 3 роки тому

    Hi Doc, you always explain things with such clarity that it STICKS to one's mind!

  • @quantaloop4002
    @quantaloop4002 4 роки тому

    it would have been nice to verbalize all the written examples of reactions; oven so, one of the best explanation I've seen; instantly subscribed

  • @robertkristofpaulsen2689
    @robertkristofpaulsen2689 4 роки тому +2

    Why does Dave use a German 'ß' (sharp 's') instead of a Greek beta at 3:00?

  • @upmagaonkar4272
    @upmagaonkar4272 4 роки тому

    Your eyes describe your love for science. Keep educating us Professor!!

  • @JGHFunRun
    @JGHFunRun 2 роки тому

    The unstable isotopes that decay via gamma emission are a form of "nuclear isomer", where the nucleus is not in the ground state (most stable state) but an excited state, usually they either decay via fission or gamma emission. The unstable state is notated as Sy* (Sy is the rest of the symbol of the element)

  • @md.mujahidulislampolock4361
    @md.mujahidulislampolock4361 5 років тому +3

    Take love sir.... ❤.
    Allah gives you more knowledge to spread it.

  • @nirupamam2814
    @nirupamam2814 6 років тому +4

    You are the best professor in the world..You have a lot of knowledge.. Thanks for sharing this beautiful one..All of your videos are very good..

  • @samhithasamishetty5247
    @samhithasamishetty5247 4 роки тому

    Simply a whole chapter in a nut shell..thanks a lot

  • @Josh_Sap
    @Josh_Sap 5 років тому

    He knows about all the science stuff! With Professor Dave Explains... THANK YOU SO MUCH!! 💕💕

  • @galaxy_apollo13
    @galaxy_apollo13 4 роки тому +2

    8:36 if a proton releases a positron in beta decay so it can become a neutral neutron, wouldn't it lose more more mass and the proton would become lighter than it initally was. Ig protons are lighter than neutrons, then how can they become a neutron by losing more mass?

    • @FrostDirt
      @FrostDirt 4 роки тому +2

      Proton reverse decaying into neutron requires energy, which surprise surprise generates the mass.

  • @pilotf18
    @pilotf18 2 роки тому

    EXCELLENT PRESENTATION!! Congratulations!

  • @NoelaniShapiro
    @NoelaniShapiro 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much. You are incredible at teaching concepts that would otherwise e difficult to a science student such as myself!

  • @aarjobanerjee2970
    @aarjobanerjee2970 4 роки тому

    May you hit 1 million and may the world be cured and may everyone live a good life

  • @craiggordon7550
    @craiggordon7550 4 роки тому

    This was a video I was looking for and you explained it very well. Thanks

  • @jadkhalil9263
    @jadkhalil9263 4 роки тому

    you legit taught me everything for my chem final thanks dude :D

  • @mustafacubukcu2969
    @mustafacubukcu2969 8 років тому +9

    Thank you Sir..

  • @Allestya666
    @Allestya666 2 роки тому +1

    My mind is blown. Science is so cool.

  • @hgp314
    @hgp314 6 місяців тому

    11:00 the isotopes you listed are stable

  • @walidmedhat3522
    @walidmedhat3522 2 роки тому

    hi man, you're just a piece of art 💪💪💪

  • @rahulsiva9946
    @rahulsiva9946 7 років тому

    Happy to be thought by a great professor like you , your scessions are very short and admiring , i post this message with a great sence of gratitude .Thank you sir for your great works which helped me a lot, for better understanding.

  • @DBZ1106
    @DBZ1106 2 роки тому +1

    Prof
    I have a question, if a proton give away a positron (which essentially is electron with opp charge) to become neutron, how will it gain mass??? (Considering neutrons are heavier than the proton)

  • @abdullahjaved2832
    @abdullahjaved2832 4 роки тому +2

    I understand about positron......but what about *Megatron* ...?

  • @ubaidsofi9477
    @ubaidsofi9477 4 роки тому

    Lovely..! I understand your every video that I watch but i don't understand how you do all this work.. You're very hard working i guess..

  • @NewLondonMarshall
    @NewLondonMarshall 8 років тому +4

    Excellent video! Really helped thanks

  • @martynn-i2m
    @martynn-i2m 4 роки тому

    I think professor dave made me love science so much...

  • @007-y1v
    @007-y1v 4 роки тому +1

    8:38 if a proton transforms into a neutron then it should take a electron to reach mass of neutron (positron emotion) but sir you don't Explane
    So can you Explane it I am confuse
    Please sir

  • @maleeshapriyanjana7604
    @maleeshapriyanjana7604 2 місяці тому

    Great explanation

  • @sazandude9022
    @sazandude9022 5 років тому +1

    Very nice video. Thanks man!

  • @AndrewT
    @AndrewT 4 роки тому

    Unbelievably informative and succinct video

  • @YasserHashmi
    @YasserHashmi 2 роки тому

    Brilliantly explained 👏👏👏👏👏

  • @TheKorbi
    @TheKorbi 2 роки тому

    Dave, your work is awesome. Wow.

  • @tuilikaandreas4776
    @tuilikaandreas4776 5 років тому +2

    Well explained! Thank you so much we love you.