Inverse Function Problem

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 гру 2023

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @deanflash112
    @deanflash112 7 місяців тому +70

    Bruh that chalking tapping while doing math is on another level.

    • @billy.7113
      @billy.7113 7 місяців тому +6

      He said he has been doing that for 25 years. 😊

  • @bruv4266
    @bruv4266 7 місяців тому +30

    I love it when you look at the camera instead of looking what you wrote at the end

  • @davidseed2939
    @davidseed2939 7 місяців тому +9

    you should really state the your method depends on the invertability of f otherwise we could not be sure that f(x)=f(y) implies x=y

    • @mrhtutoring
      @mrhtutoring  7 місяців тому +7

      I have a regular video explaining that.
      It's not possible to explain everything in UA-cam shorts.

  • @luisclementeortegasegovia8603
    @luisclementeortegasegovia8603 7 місяців тому +8

    Nice way of doing it. It's always necessary to remember algoritms! 👍

  • @Phymacss
    @Phymacss 7 місяців тому +7

    awesome!

  • @wahm1
    @wahm1 7 місяців тому +3

    only works with one to one functions otherwise we are not sure if there is only one unique x whose output is 7

  • @shadmanbinalamshimanto2917
    @shadmanbinalamshimanto2917 7 місяців тому +1

    I am not even understanding what he's saying but i am understanding his doing maths 😂

  • @Gbhmagic
    @Gbhmagic 7 місяців тому +1

    i used to do these in my sleep.. But not using it in my field makes one forget all this easy stuff. Now i know why my dad struggled with the math i did.. lol he was a Masters level engineer.

  • @Alien-Networking
    @Alien-Networking 7 місяців тому

    You’re awesome ❤

  • @user-xt9ri1li7h
    @user-xt9ri1li7h 7 місяців тому

    Lol

  • @hansapandya3842
    @hansapandya3842 7 місяців тому +2

    sir
    on the third step you can directly do the tp process
    I mean just simply multiply the denominator to the numerator on the other hand side
    why didn't you do so?

    • @luisclementeortegasegovia8603
      @luisclementeortegasegovia8603 7 місяців тому +1

      Because in some fractions you have two denominators and it's better to get use with that method. 👍

    • @hansapandya3842
      @hansapandya3842 7 місяців тому +2

      @@luisclementeortegasegovia8603 okay that's cool but
      The method which is I am discussing is also applicable for the problem you discussed......
      Just for an example
      1 + 2t/ (3 + t)(2 + 7t) = 5
      1st method
      1 + 2t = 5 (3 + t)(2 + 7t)
      1 + 2t = 5 (6 + 21t + 2t + 7t²)
      1 + 2t = 30 + (5 x 23t) + 35t²
      1 + 2t = 30 + 115t + 35t²
      .....continued
      2nd method
      1 + 2t/ (3 + t)(2 + 7t) = 5
      1 + 2t/ (6 + 21t + 2t + 7t²) = 5
      1 + 2t = 5 (6 + 21t + 2t + 7t²)
      1 + 2t = 30 + (5 x 23t) + 35t²
      1 + 2t = 30 + 115t + 35t²
      .....continued
      we casually use the 2nd method.......

  • @spicytuna08
    @spicytuna08 7 місяців тому +1

    can u elaborate how inverse of a function work?

    • @Mycroft616
      @Mycroft616 7 місяців тому +1

      Substitute y for f(x), swap x and y, then solve for y. For example
      f(x) = x^2 - 4x + 4
      y = x^2 - 4x + 2
      x = (y - 2)^2
      y - 2 = x^(1/2)
      y = 2 + x^(1/2)
      You can also check since f[f^-1(x)] = x = f^-1[f(x)].
      In the case of my example, however, we need to be careful since we have even powers and even roots. If you check the negative x values, you see a problem with the inverse that means an unrestricted domain excludes the inverse from being a function. In order to be all encompassing, we would actually need two inverse functions with restricted domains and a sign change.

  • @minhnguyenhong1023
    @minhnguyenhong1023 7 місяців тому +1

    I don’t think you find enough solution for the problem, because there might be different values of a and b such that f(a) = f(b)

  • @ruchitripathi4928
    @ruchitripathi4928 7 місяців тому +1

    How can we set them equal as many functions have same value for different values of x can someone explain pls or this is a special case

    • @Mycroft616
      @Mycroft616 7 місяців тому +3

      The notation signifies the inverse of function f is also a function. Since f^-1(7) outputs 3, the definition of a function means _only_ f(3) can output 7.

    • @carultch
      @carultch 7 місяців тому +3

      Even if it has a multivalued inverse, this method still produces at least one valid value of t.
      To conclude that it is the only valid value of t, you'd have to also know that f(x) is a 1-to-1 function.

  • @speakingsarcasm9014
    @speakingsarcasm9014 7 місяців тому +1

    Is it assumed that f is one-one?

    • @carultch
      @carultch 7 місяців тому

      Yes. It is required that the f(x) is a one-to-one function for this reasoning to be valid.

    • @bambouejfr9263
      @bambouejfr9263 7 місяців тому

      If a function has an inverse, it means that they are bijective (each y has one and only one x)

  • @SampsonNekuJunior
    @SampsonNekuJunior 7 місяців тому +2

    Please the answer is just -4

  • @anestismoutafidis4575
    @anestismoutafidis4575 7 місяців тому

    => 1/f(7)=3 f(7)=1/3 f[(1-2t)/(1+2t)]=f(7) f[(1-2i)/(1+2i)]=-i/3i=-1/3; f[(1-2•1)/(1+2•1)]=-1/3 t1=| i |; t2= |1|

  • @India__01
    @India__01 7 місяців тому

    What is f

    • @carultch
      @carultch 7 місяців тому

      The name of an unspecified function. It is assumed for lack of other information, that f(x) is a one-to-one function, with only a single-valued inverse.

  • @joelwillis2043
    @joelwillis2043 7 місяців тому

    imagine assuming the inverse exists without proving it

    • @bambouejfr9263
      @bambouejfr9263 7 місяців тому

      Imagine assuming that f((1-2t)/(1+2t)) is even defined. That's just the data given in the exercise, they are not gonna give you false information.

    • @joelwillis2043
      @joelwillis2043 7 місяців тому

      @@bambouejfr9263 you get 0 marks for making any such assumption of existence. Not sure what brain dead take you are on.