Naam Bhagwat, kam se kam Bhagat gita he padh le hoti. Shree Krishan ne Mahabharat me Arjun ko kya aadesh deya ? Jubki, Nakul sehdev ke Mama pandawo ke taraf se yudh karne aaye par Duryodhan ke pakch me ho gaye (reason dharam raha ho adharam raha ho) to Shree Krishan ne yudh rok nahi deya. Har wo insan paapi aur adharmi hai jo adharam ke sath hai wo chahe phir paraya ho ya apna. Bangaladesh ke leye agar kuch action leya hota, waha ke logo ko bacha leya hota. Tab kaha ja sakta tha, ki BJP aur RSS jarurat parne par hame bhi bacha lege. Par aisa kuch nahi hua. Jo marna ek din nischit he hai sabka. So apni virast ki chor deya adharam hai. Har ek mandir vapas chaheye, SHAM DAM DAND BHED. JAISE HO.
How Bhagwat decided that Shree Ram is above and Mahadev or Shree Krishan or any other ishwar is less. In Sanatan all gods reside in each other. All are concerned and respected by each other. So either we needed all the temples or no one was needed.
Vajpai had made a sensible suggestion. As a gesture of good will Muslims give Hindus Ram janambhomi Ayodhya Kanshivisvanath Varanasi Krishan janambhomi Mathura and close this chapter once and for all
Mohan Bhagwat must be mindful of the potential repercussions of his recent statements, much like the BJP faced backlash during the last general election. At that time, BJP president J.P. Nadda declared that the party no longer needed the RSS's support, while its candidate Lallu Singh controversially claimed that securing 400+ seats would allow the party to usher in a new era, even changing the Constitution. These remarks proved to be the proverbial "death nail in the coffin," leading to the loss of 29 crucial seats in Uttar Pradesh alone. It was only after recognizing this misstep and making necessary corrections that the RSS stepped in to support the BJP in the Haryana and Maharashtra state elections, yielding visible success. This underscores the inseparable bond between the RSS and BJP, akin to the well-known proverb चोली दामन का साथ. Similarly, Bhagwat's recent comments risk derailing the momentum required to establish Bharat as a true Hindu Rashtra, restore its cultural glory, and protect the majority Sanatani community. His speech seems to play a double game, undermining the significant progress made since 2014 toward reviving the nation’s cultural and spiritual heritage. It further jeopardizes the efforts of dedicated statesmen like Narendra Modi, Yogi Adityanath, and others, who have tirelessly worked in this direction. Bhagwat must issue a clarificatory statement at the earliest opportunity, ensuring that his words are not misconstrued as a setback to the ongoing mission of making Bharat a Hindu Rashtra or as a rejection of the efforts undertaken thus far. Clarity is essential to prevent unnecessary confusion and to maintain the collective focus on the vision of a resurgent Bharat.
Fully agree with Anand Ranganathan.All discredited Sanatan temples must be reclaimed
Rahul Kanwal.. viewers hate you when you argue with your guests.. let them make their point and let the diverse views stand..
Bhagawatji should resign and enjoy his retirement for his own wellbeing and others as well
There is a need for CRS (compulsory retirement) for the aged, Both Modi and Bhagawat are 74 now and by 2025 both must retire
Naam Bhagwat, kam se kam Bhagat gita he padh le hoti. Shree Krishan ne Mahabharat me Arjun ko kya aadesh deya ?
Jubki, Nakul sehdev ke Mama pandawo ke taraf se yudh karne aaye par Duryodhan ke pakch me ho gaye (reason dharam raha ho adharam raha ho) to Shree Krishan ne yudh rok nahi deya. Har wo insan paapi aur adharmi hai jo adharam ke sath hai wo chahe phir paraya ho ya apna.
Bangaladesh ke leye agar kuch action leya hota, waha ke logo ko bacha leya hota. Tab kaha ja sakta tha, ki BJP aur RSS jarurat parne par hame bhi bacha lege. Par aisa kuch nahi hua. Jo marna ek din nischit he hai sabka. So apni virast ki chor deya adharam hai. Har ek mandir vapas chaheye, SHAM DAM DAND BHED. JAISE HO.
How Bhagwat decided that Shree Ram is above and Mahadev or Shree Krishan or any other ishwar is less. In Sanatan all gods reside in each other. All are concerned and respected by each other. So either we needed all the temples or no one was needed.
Vajpai had made a sensible suggestion. As a gesture of good will Muslims give Hindus Ram janambhomi Ayodhya Kanshivisvanath Varanasi Krishan janambhomi Mathura and close this chapter once and for all
Mohan Bhagwat must be mindful of the potential repercussions of his recent statements, much like the BJP faced backlash during the last general election. At that time, BJP president J.P. Nadda declared that the party no longer needed the RSS's support, while its candidate Lallu Singh controversially claimed that securing 400+ seats would allow the party to usher in a new era, even changing the Constitution. These remarks proved to be the proverbial "death nail in the coffin," leading to the loss of 29 crucial seats in Uttar Pradesh alone. It was only after recognizing this misstep and making necessary corrections that the RSS stepped in to support the BJP in the Haryana and Maharashtra state elections, yielding visible success. This underscores the inseparable bond between the RSS and BJP, akin to the well-known proverb चोली दामन का साथ.
Similarly, Bhagwat's recent comments risk derailing the momentum required to establish Bharat as a true Hindu Rashtra, restore its cultural glory, and protect the majority Sanatani community. His speech seems to play a double game, undermining the significant progress made since 2014 toward reviving the nation’s cultural and spiritual heritage. It further jeopardizes the efforts of dedicated statesmen like Narendra Modi, Yogi Adityanath, and others, who have tirelessly worked in this direction.
Bhagwat must issue a clarificatory statement at the earliest opportunity, ensuring that his words are not misconstrued as a setback to the ongoing mission of making Bharat a Hindu Rashtra or as a rejection of the efforts undertaken thus far. Clarity is essential to prevent unnecessary confusion and to maintain the collective focus on the vision of a resurgent Bharat.
Mr Anchor Rahul is trying to mislead the learned seer Jagatguru R Acharya
True who is he ?
I wonder about Rahul 😂😂😂
But he can't succeed
Rahul cleverly... and foolishly... diverts topic to GDP/economy... a fully commercial thought.
Mr Anchor Rahul is trying to mislead the learned seer Jagatguru R Acharya