I mean is Spright fair compared to some decks? Yes. But game 1 Tenpai opened Nib, Imperm, Veiler, Kaimen. I don't think there is a rogue deck in the format that beats that lol
I think he misplayed too, commentator said he didn’t chain red to veiler because he was probably saving for nib but if he negated veiler and opp let gigantic resolve after then he couldn’t have been nibbed anyway, and if his opponent chained imperm there then he could’ve potentially made rabbit to set azarune (if he plays it) or potentially sp to play around the nib, if he were able to make sp then he could’ve chained sp to banish the red and itself then went into next turn with red, sp, and double cross live
I think he misplayed too, commentator said he didn’t chain red to veiler because he was probably saving for nib but if he negated veiler and opp let gigantic resolve after then he couldn’t have been nibbed anyway, and if his opponent chained imperm there then he could’ve potentially made rabbit to set azarune (if he plays it) or potentially sp to play around the nib, if he were able to make sp then he could’ve chained sp to banish the red and itself then went into next turn with red, sp, and double cross live
@@juurk2.020 It never once clued in to me that the summoning restriction on gigantic turns off nibiru (because I was in fact waiting for the nibiru at the end of the turn). the fact he had imperm kinda makes it irrelevant (and no i don't play rabbit + azarune), but thanks for the heads up!
@@lukedobsyeah, gigantic is such an insane card, I’m new to the rabbit statue engine but it seems solid, he also wouldn’t be able to summon with hieratic during your turn if you resolve gigantic, or quick synchro
I mean is Spright fair compared to some decks? Yes. But game 1 Tenpai opened Nib, Imperm, Veiler, Kaimen. I don't think there is a rogue deck in the format that beats that lol
As the spright player, that was a very unfortunate hand the play against
I think he misplayed too, commentator said he didn’t chain red to veiler because he was probably saving for nib but if he negated veiler and opp let gigantic resolve after then he couldn’t have been nibbed anyway, and if his opponent chained imperm there then he could’ve potentially made rabbit to set azarune (if he plays it) or potentially sp to play around the nib, if he were able to make sp then he could’ve chained sp to banish the red and itself then went into next turn with red, sp, and double cross live
I think he misplayed too, commentator said he didn’t chain red to veiler because he was probably saving for nib but if he negated veiler and opp let gigantic resolve after then he couldn’t have been nibbed anyway, and if his opponent chained imperm there then he could’ve potentially made rabbit to set azarune (if he plays it) or potentially sp to play around the nib, if he were able to make sp then he could’ve chained sp to banish the red and itself then went into next turn with red, sp, and double cross live
@@juurk2.020 It never once clued in to me that the summoning restriction on gigantic turns off nibiru (because I was in fact waiting for the nibiru at the end of the turn). the fact he had imperm kinda makes it irrelevant (and no i don't play rabbit + azarune), but thanks for the heads up!
@@lukedobsyeah, gigantic is such an insane card, I’m new to the rabbit statue engine but it seems solid, he also wouldn’t be able to summon with hieratic during your turn if you resolve gigantic, or quick synchro
Spright content 🔥🔥🔥🔥🤘🤘🤘🤘
Sick duel
XD the one is funny 😂😂
Pk duel Pls ;0