Patek Philippe Calendars - Perpetual Calendar 3940 compared to Annual Calendar 5035

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 бер 2014
  • Patek Philippe Calendars - Perpetual Calendar 3940 compared to Annual Calendar 5035

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @jordangrounds6547
    @jordangrounds6547 10 років тому

    I like the 5035, brown leather strap makes it lovely

  • @galja6889
    @galja6889 7 років тому

    I have a 3940 ,a Blancpain perpetual calender and a ulysee Nardin aqua perpetual.I personally like the annual calender best with the second hand over the 3940 and slightly beefier.I like the Ulysee best. Large date,waterproof and if you shop a much more moderate price.

  • @99somerville
    @99somerville 10 років тому

    I would take either one although the cost is crazy.

  • @dlhussain81
    @dlhussain81 10 років тому +1

    The perpetual is nicer, lume on annual ruins aesthetics as well the inclusion of seconds hand

  • @40000pirate
    @40000pirate 10 років тому +1

    No second hand, 36mm, you have to be 350 years old to appreciate that Patek. It has a quiet sophistication about it however, understated and elegant, it's silence is deafening and sophistication unyielding. At first glance the annual looks better, but on further investigation the Perpetual just keeps growing on you till you realise what an amazing piece it really is...

  • @traviskoh999
    @traviskoh999 9 років тому

    Why did they use lumed hands/markers on the 5035 is beyond me.
    Looks like a cheap knockoff in Bangkok

  • @317537lance
    @317537lance 10 років тому

    I just can't stand a watch without a second hand. Archie's watch is nicer

    • @Paul37Ontario
      @Paul37Ontario 10 років тому +4

      I guess when you have the money to buy the perpetual, the seconds don't matter. The seconds are for workers, not CEO's.

  • @samabed75
    @samabed75 10 років тому

    First fuckerzzz