I have a 3940 ,a Blancpain perpetual calender and a ulysee Nardin aqua perpetual.I personally like the annual calender best with the second hand over the 3940 and slightly beefier.I like the Ulysee best. Large date,waterproof and if you shop a much more moderate price.
No second hand, 36mm, you have to be 350 years old to appreciate that Patek. It has a quiet sophistication about it however, understated and elegant, it's silence is deafening and sophistication unyielding. At first glance the annual looks better, but on further investigation the Perpetual just keeps growing on you till you realise what an amazing piece it really is...
I like the 5035, brown leather strap makes it lovely
I have a 3940 ,a Blancpain perpetual calender and a ulysee Nardin aqua perpetual.I personally like the annual calender best with the second hand over the 3940 and slightly beefier.I like the Ulysee best. Large date,waterproof and if you shop a much more moderate price.
I would take either one although the cost is crazy.
The perpetual is nicer, lume on annual ruins aesthetics as well the inclusion of seconds hand
No second hand, 36mm, you have to be 350 years old to appreciate that Patek. It has a quiet sophistication about it however, understated and elegant, it's silence is deafening and sophistication unyielding. At first glance the annual looks better, but on further investigation the Perpetual just keeps growing on you till you realise what an amazing piece it really is...
Why did they use lumed hands/markers on the 5035 is beyond me.
Looks like a cheap knockoff in Bangkok
I just can't stand a watch without a second hand. Archie's watch is nicer
I guess when you have the money to buy the perpetual, the seconds don't matter. The seconds are for workers, not CEO's.
First fuckerzzz