Pandit Gopi Krishna Interviewed by Dr. Lou Rogers ~ Kundalini

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @illuminate50
    @illuminate50 3 роки тому

    *Спасибо этому человеку - вовремя попалась его книга и помогла пережить то же самое, но более легко благодаря его знаниям и опыту, огромная благодарность! Thanks to this man - his book came across in time and helped to experience the same thing, but more easily thanks to his knowledge and experience, huge gratitude! 🙏*

  • @virbone7141
    @virbone7141 4 роки тому

    Thanks for arranging this great opportunity having be with the great scientist of Spituality/ minds setting !!!

  • @sakthivelvel51
    @sakthivelvel51 4 роки тому +2

    Kundalini is responsible for everything , attainment also takes place only by this vital energy but a person does not do anything it Goes up not to try to make it up..

  • @ubergeraldine
    @ubergeraldine 4 роки тому +1

    There cannot be a unity of religion using exchange of ideas. Religion was not founded from a intellectual experience but is interpreted by it. The intellect always strives to be right - and the less it is developed the less it is likely to grasp the concept of unity.

  • @Zenarnesh
    @Zenarnesh 4 роки тому +1

    ✔️ Thanks for the video 🙏

  • @virbone7141
    @virbone7141 4 роки тому +1

    Thought provoking sentences!!!

  • @progamer-ll2ry
    @progamer-ll2ry 3 роки тому

    Gopi krishna is completely right becouse when i read his book kundalini & after I automatically I gose dhiyan 2.half year daily 2 & three hours . after three year I experience oll kundalini experience.than . some problem . that time i meet many saadhu in india but they have no answer.!

    • @ayahuascaa9455
      @ayahuascaa9455 2 роки тому

      What is the problem? Is it head pressure?

  • @harshaputtanagoudaru8159
    @harshaputtanagoudaru8159 4 місяці тому

    After listening ug krishnamurti, all other explanations fall apart,

  • @NabeelAhmed-ln3fw
    @NabeelAhmed-ln3fw 8 років тому +2

    There are three ways of achieving enlightment and reaching God.
    1. Prophets (via an Angel), eg Moses, Muhammad S.A.W
    2. Sufies , Pundits etc. eg. Buddha.
    3. Philosophers eg. Aristotle, Suqrat etc.
    All of them use totally different methods to reach God.
    by JAG.

    • @tretayug3500
      @tretayug3500 8 років тому +1

      SP95 ntR There is no such thing to reach! We just know ourselves "Really"! Many call the realization of that "thing" God but actually there is nothing separate from us and if there is something separate then there is duality which is not the case!

    • @SkyRiver1
      @SkyRiver1 2 роки тому

      lol, There are no "ways" of achieving enlightenment, but there are lots of fairy tales about these fairy tales.

  • @mrmatthewwilson3498
    @mrmatthewwilson3498 6 років тому

    Evolutionarily Enlightenment Master Wilson 22 years of Qigong
    forever perfecting Eternal Duality currently releasing my shortcomings and limitations internally set by self perception cautionary measure knocking on the door of While radical acceptance having already been The accomplishing while restrained limitless potential existing as the am that is....

  • @murrik
    @murrik 4 роки тому +1

    34:00

  • @SkyRiver1
    @SkyRiver1 8 років тому +5

    Gopi and many other talk and talk and talk (or did while alive.) But, and if you are passionate about awakening, you ignore this at your own risk.
    No one, not Gopi, not Gurdjieff, not Krishnamurti, not Maharshi, not Jan Cox, and that's pretty much the best of them: not one of them has ever told you or anyone anything about enlightenment.
    Here is a fail safe way to tell if you or anyone you know has awakened this living light within them. Note if you are thinking or not. If you are thinking, for such time as you mind is active in this automatic manner (if you haven't noticed all thoughts are automatic because the mind that deals exclusively in associated words and images is not really alive) for such time as you are think, no matter that the thoughts are of enlightenment or your favorite spiritual charlatan, I mean hero, you are sound asleep.
    Gopi Krishna is deluded by thinking that something he has done awakened him. He is just a little incorrect in this belief, which is to say he is totally incorrect in thinking that something he did brought about his awakening, if indeed he did awaken. I find it kind of difficult to believe that someone who said as many clearly erroneous statements as he has can be enlightened. In the end he is just a creature of his culture broadcasting his beliefs about an experience he had that defies explanation.
    I would bet anything that almost everyone has had this experience, but in most it is fleeting (like only seconds in duration) and they have no context from which to make some kind of sense out of it and cannot tolerate it at all, though their mechanical associative mind has believed all along and will still believe after the requisite rationalizations that they still seek it, or they had no prefab cultural masks to hang over it like Gopi did, so it is soon forgotten, and if remembered it is by the associations that the ordinary mechanical mind has about it when the person comes back down, and no matter what these Indian snake oil rock stars claim, they all come back down, but this experience now acts as a beacon for their future . I am telling you and there is really no way to prove this to someone who has never had the grand experience of the physical ignition of the nervous system: when engulfed and embraced by this inner fountain of liquid light, I am telling you that they explain nothing. He has never told you anything real about enlightenment, and nobody else has either.
    Actually his explanations and descriptions are so childish, and the phenomenon he seems to be reporting on are trivial. This is just bragging, as if seeing a moon-like luster is something other than superficial salesmanship. Look at this car, it has air conditioned seats. That is about the level he is at, he has told you nothing that will lead anywhere real. You want to see an example of someone who was more contemporary and also experienced these higher states but every word he spoke was of practical use try Jan Cox. Gopi Krishna used the word "I" here in this little talk more frequently than Jan did in all his talks put together, and I understand there are abut six thousand of them, most two hours in length it seems. These preachings by established groups and churches and organizations are almost 100% works of fantasy or deception. Actually I have a somewhat higher opinion of an intentional charlatan who knows what he is than someone like Gopi who misleads everyone who believes him, simply because nothing that is not misleading can be said about the entire matter.
    You are either awake or you are not. If you are talking you are not awake, unless you consider ventriloquism as your spiritual path, because soon as you opened your mouth you turned into a dummy, not a stupid person, a puppet that has no knowledge about strings and hands up their butts. If, on the other hand you are wondering if you are awake or not, you ain't. It ain't subtle, like some of the wannabe mystics would have you believe, because anything they have seen is exceedingly subtle, so subtle that it barely exists -- OK, in fact it doesn't exist. Awakening will transform you, and one of the ways in which it will transform you is that you will find it so distasteful to enunciate a sentence such as: "Then I this and I that and everything I touched felt like I had been dipped in cream up to my "I" balls or some other superficial stealthy way to aggrandize one's ego, cause that is the kind of shit that people want to hear, meaningless reports from Disneyland that entertain, like fairy tales but actually gain you nothing and for such time as you entertain such reports you are still asleep but now you are not even dreaming your own waking dream, you are dreaming his dream., the next step down is video games, then television, then alcoholism, then a prefrontal lobotomy.
    Jan Cox only used the word "I" on rare occasions, and then only metaphorically. He is a man that woke up and the difference between the quality of information he gave in his talks and this tripe, is like the difference between someone repeating old fairy tales to an audience of enraptured children and a physicist explaining how to build future technologies to a group of fellow scientists. He is the most enlightened guy I have found on youtube, though I must admit I didn't search much, because my interest in these self-proclaimed masters is limited by the fact that my own experiences are way beyond what these guys are talking about. Bending spoons with your mind -- I don't care what someone has said or claimed, when they believe something as stupid as someone being able to bend spoons with their mind they can't be trusted, because on one level at least, they are a credulous idiot. And one level is way more than is acceptable in someone who is claiming to be an authority on becoming a genius.
    I do believe that something happened to him, he wasn't really able to see very much or comprehend what he could see so he associated it with the memes rampant in his culture, which are actually a bit cloying and tacky as are many of his stated conclusions he derived from his mechanical and wholly subconscious associations. So what is the difference between what he has done and a delusional mundane mind? Not much. But at least he did manage to see that enlightenment is an entirely physical phenomenon, as is everything.

    • @alfwalker1175
      @alfwalker1175 8 років тому +3

      Wow...all that diatribe with less than a dozen "I"s...!

    • @tretayug3500
      @tretayug3500 8 років тому +12

      Jac Flasche You written what you see from your distorted vision reality!

    • @twobuoysmalta2739
      @twobuoysmalta2739 7 років тому +1

      every one is distorted some more than others. i see that you are more distorted than Jac by acting as a simpleton... no a dummy who felt he needed to say something and not something important to say.

    • @tretayug3500
      @tretayug3500 7 років тому +3

      TwoBuoys Bistro Chill, Some people are conditioned enough to remain the same average individuals by questioning relevant facts with their stupidity, illiteracy and Zero experience about anything sacred in life.

    • @raghvendratripathi3911
      @raghvendratripathi3911 5 років тому

      Jac Flasche Read complete works of swami vivekanand...

  • @knightowl787
    @knightowl787 2 місяці тому

    If the Buddha did not believe in Gods, why is one of his epithets "śaththa deva-manuṣsāṇaṃ" which means teacher of the Gods and man? In the Jataka tales of the Buddha's past lives there are constant references to gods. For example, in Jataka 258, Mandhatu Jataka, it is said:
    "A long time passed, but the Bodhisatta still felt discontent from unsatisfied cravings and so ascended higher to the heaven of Indra, king of the gods, where another throng of gods greeted him. Indra gave him half his realm and they ruled together until Indra was thirty-six million years old, and then it was time for him to be reborn on earth. Another god became the new Indra, and the Bodhisatta reigned alongside him for his entire lifetime, and then again with others; thirty-six Indras in all."
    Having an awakened kundalini is amazing but it does not make you omniscient. But I do not doubt that this man is much smarter than me in spite of that minor mistake in regard to the Buddha.