Interpretação ***** cinco estrelas, fantástica e precisa. Parabéns ao grupo sinfõnico & Regente. Esse Concerto é um dos maiores clássicos do Século XX!!!! O ADORO!!!!
Neoklassische und konstruierte Aufführung dieses wunderschönen doch einzigartig detaillierten Konzerts mit perfekt entsprechenden doch farbenreichen Tönen aller Instrumente. Der ausgezeichnete US-amerikanische Dirigent leitet das intelligente und geniale norddeutsche Orchester im möglichst effektiven Tempo und mit veränderlicher Dynamik. Hörenswert vom Endre bis zum Anfang! (Und auch umgekehrt)
I dont know why in german comments always this "veränderlicher Dynamik" "effektiver Dynamik" shows up? Isnt this already clear in classical music, nothing you have to write about?
@@staffanolofsson8201i realized there’s a couple of people always commenting on videos using the same terminology. Everything is always amazing, differentiated dynamics, effective tempo and so on. Makes me laugh every time
This consert isnt so much "Bartók" as his previous works. I wonder if coming as a refugee to a new continent maybe influences his composing? Maybe it is an attempt to bring in both sides in his composing, this new with many options, and the old with also references in this music. Anyway it is a wonderful consert with premiere 1943. Sorry to say he died not so long after in leukemia, in 1945.
Wunderschöne und detaillierte Aufführung dieses neoklassischen doch einzigartig konstruierten Konzerts mit farbenreichen doch perfekt entsprechenden Tönen aller Instrumente. Der intelligente und geniale US-amerikanische Dirigent leitet das ausgezeichnete norddeutsche Orchester im veränderlichen Tempo und mit möglichst effektiver Dynamik. Hörenswert vom Anfang bis zum Ende!
I dont know why in german comments always this "veränderlicher Dynamik" "effektiver Dynamik" shows up? Isnt this already clear in classical music, nothing you have to write about?
So, for the most part, the musicians of this very fine orchestra focused and played beautifully. Very well conducted too, which I don't give out easily. Gilbert knows this Bartok Concerto for Orchestra. Think how much better it would've been, like vK or Solti, if a few of these musicians were to focus on the music instead of following which camera is prompting them to smile and pretend to be sweet friends to someone else in the orchestra and do cute smiles. Does the Mona Lisa need a moustache painted on it? Does Shakespeare need strobe lighting during the murder scene? (I'll be sorry I suggested that, no doubt) Does Bartok, Beethoven, Rachmaninoff need help by orchestra members acting cute?
That has nothing to do with the musicians being unfocused or deliberately smiling at the camera. I have played there myself, and no one knows when any camera is directed at them. The musicians are simply enjoying making music together, and it has nothing to do with „pretending to be friends with someone else in the orchestra and doing cute smiles.“
IRRELEVANT AND OBNOXIOUS: CLASSIC IS NOT JAZZ. JAZZ DOES NOT MIX WITH CLASSIC.JAZZ IS TRASH, DEPRESSING MELODIES, NOISE, KRACH, LAERM. JAZZ IS A PROBLEMATIC WILD DANCE NOISY SAXOPHONE COMPOSED GENRE FROM A TROUBLED ERA. JAZZ CREATES DISTRACTION, DISORGANIZATION, DESTRUCTION. JAZZ IS SIMPLY MUSIC, PAINFUL, CRAZY, DEAD END HAMMERING BEATS. EINFACH SCHROTT. WEG DAMIT. SUBSTANCE AND RELEVANCE: CLASSIC IS FINE ARTISTIC COMPOSITION, TUNED TO THE UNIVERSE AND COSMOS, INSPIRING UP TONE MELODIES, SERENADES, DIVERTIMENTOS, ANDANTE, ALLEGROS, ALLEGRETTOS, PESANTE, PRESTOS, CELLOS, VIOLINS, CLARINETS, FLUTE, HORN, HARP. CLASSIC CREATES, CONCENTRATES, FOCUSES ON SOUL SILENCE AND DEEP MEDITATIVE THINKING. ORCHESTRAS ARE PAINLESS, SOOTHING, CURING, RELIEVING, THERAPEUTIC.
Interpretação ***** cinco estrelas, fantástica e precisa. Parabéns ao grupo sinfõnico & Regente. Esse Concerto é um dos maiores clássicos do Século XX!!!! O ADORO!!!!
As a musical no-nothing I've always liked the way the fourth movement seems to finish in mid-air.
Neoklassische und konstruierte Aufführung dieses wunderschönen doch einzigartig detaillierten Konzerts mit perfekt entsprechenden doch farbenreichen Tönen aller Instrumente. Der ausgezeichnete US-amerikanische Dirigent leitet das intelligente und geniale norddeutsche Orchester im möglichst effektiven Tempo und mit veränderlicher Dynamik. Hörenswert vom Endre bis zum Anfang! (Und auch umgekehrt)
Vielen Dank!
I dont know why in german comments always this "veränderlicher Dynamik" "effektiver Dynamik" shows up? Isnt this already clear in classical music, nothing you have to write about?
@@staffanolofsson8201i realized there’s a couple of people always commenting on videos using the same terminology. Everything is always amazing, differentiated dynamics, effective tempo and so on. Makes me laugh every time
Music can be so thrilling, dark and sensuous. Just 5 minutes into the opening sequence, you'll understand that this is Bartok's masterpiece.
Thank you for your comment! We are glad, you like it so much! #BelaBartok 🤩
This consert isnt so much "Bartók" as his previous works. I wonder if coming as a refugee to a new continent maybe influences his composing? Maybe it is an attempt to bring in both sides in his composing, this new with many options, and the old with also references in this music. Anyway it is a wonderful consert with premiere 1943. Sorry to say he died not so long after in leukemia, in 1945.
Concert?
@@notaire2 Yes, Konzert für Orchester.
But more like a symphony, but in five moments, unusual for a symphony. So an unsual consert, or an unusual symphony. Best wishes!
31:43
26:44
Wunderschöne und detaillierte Aufführung dieses neoklassischen doch einzigartig konstruierten Konzerts mit farbenreichen doch perfekt entsprechenden Tönen aller Instrumente. Der intelligente und geniale US-amerikanische Dirigent leitet das ausgezeichnete norddeutsche Orchester im veränderlichen Tempo und mit möglichst effektiver Dynamik. Hörenswert vom Anfang bis zum Ende!
I dont know why in german comments always this "veränderlicher Dynamik" "effektiver Dynamik" shows up? Isnt this already clear in classical music, nothing you have to write about?
So, for the most part, the musicians of this very fine orchestra focused and played beautifully. Very well conducted too, which I don't give out easily. Gilbert knows this Bartok Concerto for Orchestra.
Think how much better it would've been, like vK or Solti, if a few of these musicians were to focus on the music instead of following which camera is prompting them to smile and pretend to be sweet friends to someone else in the orchestra and do cute smiles.
Does the Mona Lisa need a moustache painted on it?
Does Shakespeare need strobe lighting during the murder scene? (I'll be sorry I suggested that, no doubt)
Does Bartok, Beethoven, Rachmaninoff need help by orchestra members acting cute?
That has nothing to do with the musicians being unfocused or deliberately smiling at the camera. I have played there myself, and no one knows when any camera is directed at them. The musicians are simply enjoying making music together, and it has nothing to do with „pretending to be friends with someone else in the orchestra and doing cute smiles.“
IRRELEVANT AND OBNOXIOUS:
CLASSIC IS NOT JAZZ. JAZZ DOES NOT MIX WITH CLASSIC.JAZZ IS TRASH, DEPRESSING MELODIES, NOISE, KRACH, LAERM. JAZZ IS A PROBLEMATIC WILD DANCE NOISY SAXOPHONE COMPOSED GENRE FROM A TROUBLED ERA. JAZZ CREATES DISTRACTION, DISORGANIZATION, DESTRUCTION. JAZZ IS SIMPLY MUSIC, PAINFUL, CRAZY, DEAD END HAMMERING BEATS.
EINFACH SCHROTT. WEG DAMIT.
SUBSTANCE AND RELEVANCE:
CLASSIC IS FINE ARTISTIC COMPOSITION, TUNED TO THE UNIVERSE AND COSMOS, INSPIRING UP TONE MELODIES, SERENADES, DIVERTIMENTOS, ANDANTE, ALLEGROS, ALLEGRETTOS, PESANTE, PRESTOS, CELLOS, VIOLINS, CLARINETS, FLUTE, HORN, HARP. CLASSIC CREATES, CONCENTRATES, FOCUSES ON SOUL SILENCE AND DEEP MEDITATIVE THINKING.
ORCHESTRAS ARE PAINLESS, SOOTHING, CURING, RELIEVING, THERAPEUTIC.