Titanic Was Meant to Sink, Here's the Proof
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 лип 2024
- Everyone knows this story: the "unsinkable" Titanic hit an iceberg. The tragedy happened over 100 years ago but even a century later the Titanic remains the most notorious shipwreck in history.
The Titanic illustrates how technological failures often result from a succession of missteps, small failures and bad luck rather than one big mess-up. What if the Titanic sank today - would the scenario be different?
Music by Epidemic Sound www.epidemicsound.com/
Subscribe to Bright Side : goo.gl/rQTJZz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our Social Media:
Facebook: / brightside
Instagram: / brightgram
5-Minute Crafts UA-cam: www.goo.gl/8JVmuC
Stock materials (photos, footages and other):
www.depositphotos.com
www.shutterstock.com
www.eastnews.ru
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more videos and articles visit:
www.brightside.me/ - Розваги
The Titanic actually sunk slower than it was projected to sink if badly damaged. So it actually performed better than anticipated.
Bacause of how prepared they were that’s why they had bolt doors in the boiler rooms so when it started leaking threw the front they bolted that part shut but it ended up catching up
in retrospect the ship was brilliantly designed. those engineers were genius. It only sank because 100 different unlucky factor aligned at once.
@@stussymishkaIt is pretty simple actually. The Captian ignored warnings and was full speed into known icebergs,icing. The high speed and impact of the iceberg and where it hit ultimately let to the sinking.
Yes, the modern Costa Concordia sank much faster. So it proves it was not as bad as it was reputed by some to be.
FAR BETTER.. It was over engineered in my opinion
This title is extremely misleading.
Yeah, can you imagine the insurance premiums if it was? 😂
@@TheBryce98 Olympic/Titanic/Insurance. Now there`s a story!!
It's ok
Very correct, this is like the Aaron1912 V-break theory but worse.
WHY WOULD THEY SINK A SHIP THAT IS 883 FT LONG AND WITH 2400 PEOPLE ON IT ON PURPOSE? WHO WOULD DO THAT?!!
exactly
wow.. that last part where they talk about going to visit it yourself aged REAL GUD....
I'm not so sure Titanic was "meant to sink." What ship can survive more than 1/3 of its length opened to the sea? The ship was not meant to be run up against an iceberg that's hard as granite and extensively damage its hull below the waterline.
It’s got burnt and there is one week spot and it’s very sad the world has been scared of it it sank 100 years it was so sad but we had to go with it but they’re taking the Titanic out of the water I think but the Titanic’s disappearing for you and I think that there is so much damage
Dude we all know. It’s clickbate.
its called clickbait
@@zerozerohero7189 Probably so.
@@vannamthai5306 no they wont take it out since life is living on it and also the titanic has so much damage because of Bacteria
4:38 Only 3 funnels were actual funnels connected to the boilers, the other was for ventilation
And luggage storage
@@redrb26dett Wow, did not know that, thanks.
@@davidphelps5857 its false, no luggage in it just smoke from the kitchens, smoking rooms and steam turbine engine
Some even say it was where the pets were stored at night
@@TheDutchGuy110 well, some are wrong. It was a ventilation shaft. Nothing was stored there. Most storage was in the front of the ship
He will never end on why the titanic sunk
I love it
No someone farted too loud
same but i dont like that it sunk
Yas I no
Yeah I wish it was still around😥
@@margaretforsythe7512 if it was, the get ready for the end of humanity if it were to crash
Bright side: The titanic was supposed to stay afloat, even with *4* of these compartments flooded, but the iceberg hit *5* of them.
Also bright side: The iceberg grazed the ship, and the iceberg slashed a hole into *6* of these compartments, witch, you might've guessed, is *2* more than what it was designed for.
*confuse* *confused* *confusion*
Actually 6 were punctured, just that boiler room 5, the 6th compartment breeched, didn’t flood as the pumps kept the water out until the water flowed over the bulkhead.
Which not witch
Rhe metal on the site ware the iceberg hit the titanic was weak becuse of a fire in the boilerroom.
@@frederikdeschepper7607 that's completely false the iceberg hit below the water line. Also the ship was riveted together it never would have survived
Why do people not realize that Titanic was THE safest ship in the world with the best technologies at that time, it was a chain of unlucky events that let her to sink, even ships today are less safe in some regards, no ship is designed to survive a side swipe because it's so rare.
Yes, it was actually over engineered and far ahead of its time, and I mean decades ahead of its time,, A brilliant design, despite its failure/demise
100 years ago or today: All it takes is one simple mistake. Just one.
Please tell me what that common mistake is
Not getting messages about icebergs in you area? Maybe?
Avoiding hazards. The Costa Concordia, a modern-day Italian cruise ship, listed 90 degrees and then sank after her captain stupidly drove her near a shallow reef to try and impress the passengers with a close-up view of the shore. Had she been out to sea where rescue operators would mostly be unable to help, the situation could’ve been a Titanic-scale disaster.
@@badpiggies988 That seems like kinda flawed logic, the whole point of that manoeuvre was being on the coast, doesn’t really translate to travelling across an open ocean.
Title: the titanic was meant to sink, here’s the proof
Video: just facts about titanic
Me: I’m stumped
Those are not facts
Yeah
@@blu_e1910 I'm curious to know what wasn't factual or were you using "Those are not facts" in the Trump way?
@@frogstamper not in the trump way
And titanic was never meant to sink like who designs a ship to sink and this is coming from a person who has hours of research on the titanic
2:54 "I made that part up." Dude you fricking made the whole script of the video up!
Ocean liners during the early 20th century served the purpose that airlines serve now. Cruise ships existed in the Titanics day but everything about a liner like the Titanic was designed around point to point transportation.
At least the titanic doesn’t look like a floating bath tub with decks.
🤣🤣
Right😂
It doesn't look like anything anymore.
I mean ur not wrong
True 😂😂
I live in Belfast (where Titanic was built) and we still have the slipway where it was built. We even have marks to show how long it was. And near the slipway is a giant Museum called the "Titanic Quarter museum." They're a great attraction to tourists.
Wow!
So that's where it was built, thanks for the info, and also you probably have a nice view of the slipway and the museum, What a historical view.
Username checks out.
cool wow
@@NonesENSE_Official no problem, yes we do!! and if you want to know more about where it was built you should look into the Harland and Wolff shipyard, its abandoned now here in belfast but the shipyard built many glorious ships including the titanic!
well, technically by law the titanic had enough lifeboats, the sinking of the ship was one of the reasons the law was changed, it wasnt to save jp morgan money and it wasnt because it was deemed unsinkable but the actual laws at the time which supported the amount of life boats.
the thing is, Titanic only had time to launch 15 out of 16 lifeboats. Even if there were more they would run out of time.
Using the iceberg as a floating survival thing was never a consideration and would never have worked. By the the time the Titanic actually stopped the iceberg was probably half a mile or more astern in the dark. To turn around and look for it in the dark and then to somehow berth alongside an unstable jagged ice .... and then assuming that there was a flat area on it for over 1000 people to stand on. Nah never a thing worth mentioning.
agreed, unneeded storyline abruptly came out of nowhere in this slipshod video
Even if the Titanic had stopped in time to get to the iceberg, it would have been dangerous to camp out on a piece of floating ice that had just been hit with the largest ship in the world moving at full throttle
This is when I quit watching.
@@thewaywardwind548 - As soon as I read the title of the video, I knew I shouldn't watch it at all.
@@falcondragonslayer It's worth the risk to stand on those ice bergs. They don't have enough life jackets for everyone. Not even boats...The iceberg is their hope
2019 : stay away from negative people
2020 : stay away from positive people
I love how u copied a comment and the fact it has nothing to do with this video 👌
@@emiliex yeah true
@@emiliex Copying a comment doesn’t explode the earth so stop with these copying complaints but i agree with you that this has nothing to do with the video
@@killersg.8290 he should at least give the other person credit
Love how you copied a comment that doesn’t even relate to this video BY A BIT!
Ships don't carry radio operators anymore and when they did only large passenger ships kept a 24 hour manual watch.
they have sysadmins though :)
sudo apt-get remove excess-water
And the largest ship in the whole world is sea wise giant an oil tanker
Exactly
Yeah everyone knows that
Yeah
Yes
Correction largest CRUISE ship not cargo ship
By the time the severity of the situation was fully realized by Thomas Andrews and Captain Smith, the iceberg was miles away, so there was no way they could use the iceberg as a life raft. That was a plot device from the novella "Futility" (alternate title "The Wreck of the Titan" by Morgan Robertson published in 1898. Robertson has his ship the Titan, which is the largest ship of the day, run aground on an iceberg in the (surprise, surprise) North Atlantic and ripping its keel out, with some of the survivors evacuating to the berg before the ship slips off and sinks. Also it was the owners of Titanic, The Oceanic Steam Navigation Company or White Star Line, who in a cost saving move set the number of life boats to 14 main boats, two secondary boats and 4 collapsible boats with a total capacity of about 1500 for a ship that could carry 3200, incidentally in full compliance with British Board of Trade lifeboat requirements. Also in compliance with BOT requirements, there had yet to be a full lifeboat drill for even the crew let alone a briefing for the passengers about lifeboat stations or procedures.
its keel was never destroyed. there was just buckerd plates
@@kitcat342yt7 it snapped in half...
@@kitcat342yt7 He is referring to the fictional ship SS Titan from the novella Futility not the RMS Titanic
The main hull structure of large ships -- including cruise ships -- is typically constructed of STEEL, not aluminum. Although superstructures are often made of aluminum or other non-ferrous materials to reduce weight and keep centers of gravity low, the basic hulls, keels, and framing are usually steel. The larger the ship the more likely this will be the case.
Heavy steel is MUCH easier to work with than heavy aluminum - and WAY cheaper, too. Welding aluminum requires extensive preheating of the work area to fairly exact tolerances, and the heavier the aluminum the more complicated and drawn out the pre- and post-heating regimens will be. Heavy steel can often be welded with relatively simple arc/stick welding techniques that are much more forgiving of environmental fluctuations.
As for the Titanic, it was constructed at a time when riveted iron construction was the predominant method of building ships. Larger ships were already reaching their practical size limit, however, and a shift from iron to steel as a building material was just coming into play. Likewise, riveted steel construction was reaching its limits, and welded steel was the nascent metal shipbuilding method on the near horizon. These factors also played a serious part in the Titanic disaster.
Ships aren't made out of aviation grade aluminum? Im stunned.
@@HeizouHaver I thought that ships were made by Aluminum foil!
And the Germans where superior to the rest in welding techniques which they wouldn’t share re the rest of the world using rivets and the Germans refused to export so they could keep the technology secret
That is correct. In fact, construction of a modern large ship starts with working on the metallurgy.
Bro took 5 hours to type this probably 💀
Pirates: just be glad they weren’t made of wood
Lol you're right
You rlly dont know pirates am i right??
Guys. Tell. Me in the real. Story of. The real. Titanic was the two. Person in love
Like rose and jack
I don’t understand
Atleast if it was wood rose and Jack could've shared their own planks
The ships of the 1900s were more beautiful than the ships of today in my opinion. Titanic was so beautiful and Olympic too ❤️🖤🤍💛🧡
Dont forget britannic
@@wazda6488 of course, thank you. Special more so because she was a hospital ship. Sad what happened especially as that wasn't her intended role 💔😢
What do you mean "evactuating to the iceberg"??? That was never an option, they never went to the iceberg.
8:34
That picture is OLYMPIC!
Thats the titanic just do a reverse image search
@@corgigaming1567 nah dude it’s the Olympic the open A deck promenade clearly gives it away as the RMS Olympic
@@Jonno_B251so how when did it switch
@@corgigaming1567 It did not.
@@kostan55 i know it DIDNT
ok things wrong with this here video
1 6:00 the crew on titanic Never planed to put passengers on the iceberg
2 8:33 that is the Olympic
3 9:53 that is the Olympic once again
4 9:58 that is a picture of Olympics damage from the HMS Hawke
5 11:59 titanics first class tickets where only 150 dollars (about 1700 today
6 13:16 Captain Smith was doing the correct thing as back in 1912 you didn't stop until danger was spotted
7 13:25 Titanic was holding the correct amount of lifeboats the law in 1912 said it could have
8 14:23 why is it doing a downwards v break 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
9 14:25 back in 1912 getting the correct location was hard but they where still quiet arcuate
10 16:27 the wireless operator on the Californian was not fired
the whole channel is wrong
@@Marvelous0419 that I is true
you like boats a little much
no not really
it might be
7:44 Astute viewers also noticed that you previously said that 5 compartments were flooded ---> 3:27 :)
Captain Smith carried on at full speed despite ice warnings because that was standard practice on all ships on all shipping lines, and they would only reduce speed when they physically sighted ice.
The Titanic actually carried more lifeboats than it was legally required to. In those days, the number of boats a ship had to have was calculated by tonnage, not passenger numbers, and the reason a lot of boats went away not full was the strict “women and children only” edict of the day that was rigidity enforced by First Officer Lightoller in particular.
The ship was never claimed to be unsinkable by either the builders or the owners. The press in those days were as sensationalist as they are today, and it was they that dubbed it unsinkable.
1.Titanic ship is unsinkable is claimed by titanic company at that time. they run advertisements and claimed that ship is unsinkable
2. According to regulation titanic had to carry 63 lifeboats but it carry only 20 . It's reason behind this is they think titanic ship is unsinkable. its does not need more life boat
3. Many ships warned titanic at that night about icebergs but they ignore those warnings. Titanic captain Edward Smith has told the company vice chairman Bruce Ismay that. we had to slow the speed of titanic we have ice bergs warnings. Bruce Ismay fold the warnings paper and took it in his pocket. He made the pressure on captain to maintain full speed of titanic. Ismay thinks if titanic reach us in 5 days instead of 6 days. This proves titanic is not only the luxurious ship but also the fastest ship
4. That night people sitting in crows Nest was not have binoculars.the key of locker is missing in whic binocular kept.
There are many factors. Responsible for titanic sinking but I think the main reason is that they ignore warnings
There was nothing wrong with the steel--it was tested in the 1990s the steel was found to actually be fine.. It was rivets that were sheared off. This was because the areas up where the bows become narrower and the turn of the bilge could not be machine-riveted. This meant hand riveting with iron rivets rather than steel. These could become very brittle and when she sideswiped the ice berg , those rivet heads sheared off, allowing the steel plates to separate.
The rest of the critique seems pretty solid. Another thing not helping was that she took on a list, making loading and or lowering harder. On the side the ship was listing towards, the boats swung out farther than if the ship was fully upright making it difficult for them to be loaded. On the other side, lowering was made difficult because the lifeboats scraped against the rivets in the hull.
Oh, and Captain Smith DID tell the lookouts to keep a sharp lookout for small ice, bergs, and "growlers" (a type of low-lying iceberg). It didn't help that the sky was moonless and the water was still.
Also modern ships also use steel, steel isn't outdated afaia. Not to mention the Titanic was an ocean liner, not a cruise ship.....lol
Recently read somewhere, that still water is an indicator that ice bergs are near.
and the binoculars were locked and they didn't have the key
This is like comparing a skateboard and a tesla.
True
Bare true
Y.E.S
😂
LOL
It was not “meant to sink” bro. She was built the same as every other ship, with the same materials as all other ships of her era. There had never been a disaster as bad as Titanic and there had never been an incident where a ship had more than 1/3 of her total length opened up to the sea. The fact that she stayed afloat for nearly three hours after hitting an iceberg that was 5 times heavier than she was and that damaged 1/3 of her total length is a testament to her strength and shows how much her crew tried to keep her floating for as long as possible. Titanic changed EVERYTHING in shipping. Before she went down, she didn’t do anything that was out of the ordinary and she wasn’t meant to sink.
No, it was not a clerical error that the lookouts didn't have binoculars. Those would have made it harder to spot a 'berg, because you'd have to be looking straight at something to see it. Ordinarily, captains did not want lookouts trying to identify things with binoculars, their job was only to notify the bridge that they could see something. Scientists now believe they didn't see the 'berg because of light-refraction.
Why is it as a titanic enthusiast for the past three years the majority of titanic videos from Bright Side are almost entirely incorrect. Titanic was also never doomed from the start, that’s just theory’s and are proven false.
Right
Because he keeps making BS videos which people keep watching and for which UA-cam prolly pays him? I mean, why do research when you don't have to? Most of the people making comments here seem to barely be able to string a sentence together, so if you can use exactly the same footage and just tell a different bunch of lies for commentary, why not?
Bright side: Uploads many videos on how and why titanic sank...
Le Me:Sees titanic movie and understands everything😂
There's more theories about how titanic sank than to how the world started.
The Titanic movie is inaccurate in some places, so you need to do some research by books or videos. But the movie is really nice, honestly.
Imagine being a passenger on the titanic refusing to use your chance to get on a lifeboat only to realize later you gave up your only chance for survival because you didn’t believe the boat was sinking 😩
🙏
🙏🎂🎂🎂🙏🙏
🙏
🙏🎂🎂🙏🙏🙏
🙏
🙏🎂🙏🙏🙏🙏
🙏
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I would just fall in the water and swim away so I would survive
Some things to consider:
* Using the iceberg that hit the ship as a temporary haven for the passengers is both an exercise in futility and poor decision-making. Engines were run during the damage inspection and by the time it was completed, more than 15 minutes after the collision, it was determined that the better decision was to make a complete stop and relieve the boilers' pressure as the incoming sea water would've made them explode, so going after the iceberg (any iceberg in fact) would've resulted in the ship sinking much sooner than the nearly 3 hours it stayed afloat.
* That photograph is not from Britannic's explosion but the Olympic crash, it is of course not comparable to the ones that sunk its sister ships and no one was injured, the ship it collided with got sunk in WWI and Violet wasn't onboard the HMS Hawke, so in reality she survived 2 shipwrecks.
* There are better uses for your money in my opinion for the Titanic "experience": The Harland & Wolff offices with its massive drawing room in Belfast are now a hotel and the restaurant of the White Swan hotel in Northumberland boasts the paneling, stained glass and ceiling from its sister ship the Olympic. You can also, as Molly Brown did, organize and use your money to realize Robert Ballard's idea of cleaning and painting the hull to make it last longer (and I mean a lot longer than the predicted century that will last) so not only you but future generations will be able to see it. By the way, if you want to know how much that same expedition to the Titanic cost before the study that calculated its rapidly deteriorating condition was published, it was $70,000.
This is true
Nerd
When was that study? 70, 000 then or now?
It's 250k now
@@carolineh2643And it really isn't worth a single penny now
If i remember correctly i remember the people that built the titanic stated that they used 5 start metal to build the ship so it would be unsinkable but they never stated that they ran out of funds so they had to use cheap and easily broken bolts to tighten the metals.
Greetings, That is totally untrue and patently false!
Bright side:”could you tell. me:”no 😅”.
me too...at least when I first watched the video...
Bright side:"could you tell.
ALSO BRIGHT SIDE:your mom
Some tidbits of information. But bizarrely, the video launches without warning or context into an in-depth examination of the difficulties of evacuating the passengers onto an iceberg using a gangplank and lifeboats, despite this never ever been mentioned before as a possibility, let alone standard procedure. And some of the real difficulties that prevented many of the lifeboats being used (once the ship listed too far the derricks could not lower them properly into the water) were ignored.
My Mother and sister were on the last military ship that carried Military families overseas. They went from Norfolk VA to Turkey. After that they flew the families, that would have been 1961 if you are interested.
This video contradicts itself,it says 5 compartments then later says 6.
Yeah, I though what luck, just by one...then it came that six compartments flooded. Makes me wonder which is correct. 🤷🏼♂️
For a VERY QUICK google search (titanic how many compartments flooded), I've found 6 flooded.
Hello, that’s true. It opened 5 compartments, but after 6 got flooded.
@@stijnf1 I'm going with.....they all flooded.
did you know that the fourth smoke stack on the titanic actually didn't release any smoke. it was used as ventilations and also aesthetics cuz the designer didn't want three. the more you know.
Because the competitions ships, Cunard, had four stacks. They didn’t want their ship to appear less powerful.
he knows nothing about the titanic
Yes , she had it only because Andrews , And Ismay thought that the Cunards ( lussitania and Mauritania) would see more powerful
Who would have thought that smoke stacks are the car exhaust pipes of the ship world ...
They were leaning towards Hybrid and concerned about global warning and carbon foot prints early on
You might not have been able to have as much fun on an early 20th century ocean liner (especially if you couldn't afford first class ameneties), but if you overlook the chance of drowning if your ship hit an iceberg and the fact that it took a week to cross the Atlantic, I'd bet most people would find travelling on a ship a LOT more comfortable and pleasant than traveling on a plane.
I will still go by ship or car before an airplane. I dont care what the timeline is - there is nothing in the world worth flying over.
Supposedly even the steerage compartments were luxurious compared to most ships of the time.
@@Mike1064abTrue… but to have 4 maybe 5 people in a room for steerage. Rats on the ship. You name it, it was down there. I think I saw steerage would still cost you like 800-1000$ in todays time. So for 1000$ to be packed in a room with people you don’t know and let’s be real… poor people. Now that’s a problem.
@@tylercornberrydamn Spirit Airlines type seat. Forget that ! 😂
My dad worked for the symphony of the seas for 10 years as the ships Baritone Saxophone player
That’s really cool 😎
So cool
I smell cap 🧢
Symphony of the Seas is an Oasis -class cruise ship owned and operated by Royal Caribbean International. She was built in 2018 in the Chantiers de l'Atlantique shipyard in Saint-Nazaire, France, the fourth in Royal Caribbean's Oasis class of cruise ships. Her home port is Miami, a beautiful cruiser, if you like a huge floating hotel with a dozen or so decks! I used to love to cruise, but those modern liners with all those decks look, so TOP-HEAVY to me, no thanks!
how can he have worked on that ship for 10 years? Symphony was built in 2018…it’s only 3 years old!
Hilarious! Made my day. Always nice to know that there are people out there who are denser than I am.
dale bates. You are far from alone.
They make osmium look unpacked.
@@artdecotimes2942 Could you be any further up your own colon?
Roasted like the coals in the boilers of Titanic-era ships 🔥🔥⚫️🔥🔥⚫️🔥🔥⚫️🔥🔥
"Everyone knows that the Titanic was the largest ship of..."
Me: I never knew 😕
You wanna know something else I don't think the creator mentioned, the Titanic was only 11 inches longer than her sister, Olympic, which was the previous largest ship in the world.
Wouldn’t last long anyway. A year later the SS Imperator was launched.
@@derkaiser50 actually Titanic was the same lenght as Olympic, Titanic was larger but in tonnage, like that Britannic was larger than Aquitania, but shorter by a few meters
@@erikzidan2601 would you like me to get my blueprints? because I own a set of them of Titanic and Olympic, Titanic is 11inches longer than Olympic
@@derkaiser50 as far as i know the small difference was not registered much by white star line as both were flag ships
So, I guess I missed something, like why it was "Meant to sink"
And today 2 years after the video is made, people should be amazed at the audacity of selling the dream of seeing the titanic last time. More than 100 years ago Titanic ship sank, few days ago Titan submersible also sank and with that sank any desire of seeing the titanic last time no matter how rich is the person. Some incidents are not supposed to be seen and associated with in any form. They only bring misery.
Titanic seems always the most legend ship ever.
Nah, I mean no disrespect, but I personally dont see it as the most famous, or at least back in the 10s,20s,30s and early 40s it wasnt
True 💯
It wasnt the lagest to are moden ships
The one thing that the Symphony of the Seas can't steal from Titanic is its legacy and its amazing captain.
YEA
Titanics captain was not amazing
He crashed her sister ship Olympic then crashed the titanic less the six months later
@@Senorodeo The Olympic incident was an accident that nobody could have expected. And the reason the Titanic crashed was because his years and years of experience at sea worked against him because the ship's rudder was way too small
@@falcondragonslayer Titanic rudder was not small it had the necessary size after titanic sinking they used Olympic as a reference and they determined that the rudder nor the wheel where a problem the problem was that no ship at that time could had turned in enough time to avoid the iceberg
@@juanesmirez Smaller ships would have made the turn. Regardless of whether the rudder was supposedly the ‘proper size’ it could have been saved had the rudder been larger. Regulations were too lax back then. They weren’t even required to have enough lifeboats for crying out loud!
Offloading on the iceberg is a really bad idea. I saw a video of a boat dropping off 2 people on an iceberg and within seconds the iceberg rolled ontop of them. It made me realize that icebergs keep themselves perfectly balanced as it melts on all sides. Throwing bodies on a floating island is enough to make it flip. An iceberg is definitly not a boat
I'm Never going into any Submarine to visit the Titanic wreck after the Titan Implosion!!!
this dude said 5 compartments flooded. few minutes later he says 6
Yep
6 compartments were breached but 5 were flooding, the pumps kept the 6th dry until the 5th overflowed
There's also the Titanic museums in Branson, Mo or Pigeon Forge, Tn. They are modeled out of the ship and have an exact replica of the grand staircase as well as a replica of the deck. When you pay to get into the museums, you get a boarding pass with a name of a passenger that was on the ship.
Love Branson! It's like Las Vegas without the gambling, prostitutes, and homeless people everywhere. Beautiful city! It blew my mind the first time driving down Branson's main road and seeing the Titanic!
What odd places to have museums about an Atlantic liner.
@@TheRelger guess it’s exotic and novel for them
Aluminium is not used on the modern ship hull building . It's steel only . Use of Aluminium is for internal not structural parts to reduce weight .
The titanic was never meant to sink, even if it never sank it would be turned into a troop carrier or hospital ship like britannic and Olympic
There's more theories about how titanic sank than to how the world started.
Ikr
Same like with Diana&Dodi..
"The titanic was meant to sink"
*Shows the titanic made out of steel and modern ships made out of aluminum*
Gee, it's almost.
Almost like.... The ships at the time titanic was made.....
WERE ALL MADE OUT OF STEEL BECAUSE IT WAS THE MOST COMMON BUILDING MATERIAL FOR SHIPS AT THE TIME.
Funny how that works.
Furthermore, modern ships are also made out of steel.
Aluminum is mostly terrible for seagoing ships. It corrodes way too quickly.
Bingo you are right
@@b-chroniumproductions3177 S.S. United States
@@b-chroniumproductions3177 and it's not as strong as steel and also sinks
@@incorrba and catches fire
I can't believe that the Titanic was that large 😊😢😮
Go ahead, one believes what one wants to believe. Regards.
With the four collapsible lifeboats, RMS Titanic exceeded the Board of Trade requirement regarding lifeboat capacity which stipulated a vessel of 10,000 tons or more to carry 16 lifeboats with a total capacity of 9,625 cubic feet (272.5 m3), sufficient for 960 people.
The original distress call was CQD which Titanic utilized and then switched over to the recently implemented and more recognizable SOS, becoming the first to send an SOS distress call.
Operating a radio was a bit of a specialized field conveying administrative and personal traffic to and from shore. A vessel with a light traffic load would typically carry only a single operator working the better part of sixteen hour days. The radio on Titanic had broken down on April 14. Phillips and McBride spent their waking and sleeping hours repairing it on their own initiative. A considerable number of messages had accumulated which Phillips was trying to clear when advised by Californian's operator of ice with a very loud signal. The radio operator has been replaced by a facsimile machine through shore facilities or satellite.
Functional radar for a ship was still thirty years away, orbiting satellites still forty five years away. Visual lookouts was the only warning system then, and to a lesser degree still used today.
CQ D is not a distress signal, but a generic term used exclusively by Marconi operators. "CQ" means "all stations" (i.e, all the ships in the area) and "D" meant "in need of assistance".
Titanic wasn't sending out a distress call, she was telling other ships she was in need of aid without actually stating what aid she required, causing confusion onboard Frankfurt, a nearby German ship that would have arrived by 2am, in time to save more people than Carpathia did.
Since CQ D was vague and time consuming (in the same manner that the Germans used the equally vague "SOE"), it was agreed by all the wireless companies in 1906 that "SOS" would be used as an international distress signal understandable to all ships and was implemented in 1908.
As such, Titanic was not the first vessel to use the "SOS" call. The first recorded use was by an American vessel in August 1909, with many more ships using it in the following 3 years. Titanic was, however, the first recorded British flagged ship to do so.
add to the fact that the binoculars were in a lock box where the only key for it was with a guy who didn't make it on to the ship
The forth stack was for ventilation not exhaust.
Yep, they put it there to look more titanic. (No really, that was the White Star Line's idea.)
@@daveolson6001 I think it was because of Lusitania and Mauretania. White Star Line was in a competition. That means that they wanted to make it look as if the Titanic had four funnels. Although, the Lusitania DID use only three of her four funnels on her last voyage.
So when he showed the titanic belching smoke, he showed all smokestack being used, however, the fourth smokestack was just for venalation.
Ikr
Ethan Shotts. the whole video is a travesty. The fourth stack was indeed for ventilation.
@@THEJR-of5tf I was told it was for aesthetic reasons coz 3 didn't look cool.
@@Alice-sw9hf It's both. They didn't need a 4th stack for ventilation, but they wanted 4 to look cooler (if I remember correctly, they wanted it to look like the Kronprinz Wilhelm and other similar ships of the Hamburg America Line). Since they added a 4th, they decided to use it for ventilation instead of designing a separate ventilation system and having a useless funnel.
How do you know though?
In two years it cost $250k per ticket to go actually be a major part of the titanic crash site vs just seeing it.
i dont think an ice berg hit titanic i think titanic hit a ice berg
I BELIEVE THAT TITANIC WOULD BE A NEVER ENDING MYSTERY TO ALL
After watching this...the ship never had chance. Too many things were set up for it to fail. Wow
Can't believe they advertised for tickets to see the titanic. That didn't age well
99.99 of passenger ships are cruise ships not ocean liners. You cannot compare the two.
bruh that thumbnail
Steel is stronger than aluminium
Also why are we still on this topic it sank in like the 1900s
I think i like to learn bright side MORE than school
Yees
Y E S S I R
They’ve built bigger and safer ships since titanic but personally the titanic was far more luxurious. Not a fan of how the ships look today.
it looked a lot better aswell. Todays ships are just big but not beautiful like the Titanic
Titanic looks like a ship, not a bunch of bathtubs stacked on top of each other
Almost nothing nowdays feel authentic.. too much plastic and stuff
I so love the image of *Titanic* 🚢 over 100 years later gets more-evidence in fact and details. Plus better emojis, Science you name it. Even if my like only gets one I hope it lasts forever🙃
You do realize that a lot of the 'Titanic' images he had here was the Olympic, right?
No one:
Bright Side:Changing the thumbnail
The total square inches of the hole(s) that sank the ship were less than your front door.
A hole the size of a refrigerator sank a ship almost the length of 3 football fields.
A direct impact Might have been better, but it also might not have been. With a riveted hull made from forged and cast iron plates, the hull would have buckled. There would have been structural damage through the entire ship and it's likely multiple hull plates would have delaminated and lead to flooding all over the ship. Think of a car crash, the damage isn't just restricted to the front. As the car comes to a stop, the back of the car continues forward under inertia and crushes the middle of the car. Same thing with a ship. An impact with the iceberg would probably have put a near unheard of level of G force shock into the ship
No the metal would have bent and taken the forces but the ship would have been very damaged but only the front. It is very likely that it would have survived but with deaths in the front.
Jack & Rose 💔🥺
They were made up, you know that right?
And if they were real, both could have survived, the door was big enough for both of them.
@@VoiddyMans it wasnt a door, it was a wooden panel from the lounge.
The only reason the titanic was made out of steel because the iceberg wanted to steel the titanics life
lol😂
IT WAS BECAUSE THE ICEBURG...
@@evassideofthestory3739 the iceberg what?
Lol xD
*b r u h*
The RMS Olympic didn’t sink, It got rammed by the HMS Hawk. That means that Violet Jessop only was on 2 ship sinkings.
Mikael Hemlingberg
First of all it is not 'got hit' it is "was struck'
You do not understand what the word 'GOT' means. nor are you fluent in the English language.
Your vocabulary is very limited because you fail to read BOOKS.
RMS (Royal Mail Ship) Oceanic collided with the HMS Hawke, a Royal Navy Minesweeper
The collision occurred on 20 September 1911 in the Solent, which is the stretch of water
between Southampton and Portsmouth, a Royal Navy base I am very familiar with.
Note that the name is HMS HAWKE not HMS HAWK
HMS Hawke was herself sunk some five years later by a German U-boat.
You can undertake your own research
No, True, the olympic didnt sink, but Jessop was reportedly on the Olympic during the HMS Hawke collision
@@JoeLikesTrains The Olympic did sink, sometime later than Titanic. She was on all three sister ships. She was on hospital ship Brittanic when it was torpedoed by the Germans in WW1. Try reading her biography.
@@THEJR-of5tf the britannic hit a mine and the Olympic was scrapped in the 30s
@@THEJR-of5tf The Olympic sank? Are you sure? Why then do 90% of the sources on the ship say she was scrapped in the 1930s?
A trip to the Titanic site will cost you your life 00:11:34
word
Violet Jessie actually survived only 2 because the rms olympic actually never sank it collided with 2 ships but it didn’t sink
You do know aluminum welds are weaker than the parent metal ?
But welds are stronger than rivets
Hang on, one minute you say the iceberg breached 5 segments and a few minutes later you state it breached 6 segments...
Hmmmmm suspicious
also the metal then was not refined enough and it was brittle. there is a difference between iron1900 and steel 1940.
It breached 5 compartments and a coal bunker and the bunker blew
Welded hulls vs riveted hulls is much more significant than the quality of steel the plates were made of. The plates didn’t fail, the rivets did.
ships and titanic videos popping up in yt algorithm after the sub implosion catastrophe.
- Yup, im here for it
me too
Even if they had more life boats they didn’t get all the boats off Titanic as it was.
And that was in perfectly calm seas.
And not all where full
Joseph. They had more than the Board of Trade specified, sadly it would never have been enough.
It was mostly the collapsible lifeboats that failed to deploy.
@@vendettamedianl , they had trouble getting them into the water because the weren’t on davits.
Basically had to push them off.
It made no difference the ones that where launched where not all full .designed to carry 65 but tested up 70 safely they were launched with 40 people onboard
If I ever win the lottery I'm spending $505,000 to visit the sunken ship
WHY?? You had better hurry, she is disintegrating fast now, due to micro-organisms that eat away even iron! She will be totally gone by 2050, scientists say! Some say 2030! She belongs to the sea floor now, and the currents that soothe her frame as she slowly fades away.
@@mjlejer3241 That isn't accurate. Yes, the ship is disintegrating, but it will take centuries, not 3 decades, to disappear or collapse onto itself completely. It will look different by 2050, but will still be quite visible.
There is a titanic museum in Gatlinburg TN, ive been there a couple times, they have a place in It that has water in it that is the same temperature that the water was that night
Known as the unsinkable Molly Brown she was in a number no previous shipwreck and Survived them all
You’re thinking of Violet Jessop.
She worked on three White Star ships.
She survived the Titanic and Britannic sinking.
She was also on Olympic when the Hawke crashed into her I believe.
I don’t think Molly Brown was involved in any other sinking.
@@TheRelger It was Violet Jessop who survived all 3. There were no casualties in the Hawke collision, and definitely the Hawke crashed into Olympic, not the other way round. Had that occurred in open water, could have been a bit nasty, Olympic was in bad shape.
Suddenly Arthur John Priest appears ...
Only the marketing people ever claimed the titanic was unsinkable. The engineers never made such claims and even actively condemned the media and marketing for suggesting such a thing were true.
It was only said after the ship sank, Bruce Ismay tried to defend himself before he was shamed out of ceo.
The Brittanic is a little bigger then Titanic
@What? Oh Hi. It is, RMS Britannic was about 2000-3000GRT larger than Titanic
I would like to SINCERELY thank Bright Side for speaking clearly and for observing grammar, and more specifically, for observing spoken punctuation. And also, for not corrupting your narrating with useless noise effects. I can't count how many UA-camrs are an epic fail, due to deplorable speech.
Too many errors in this video. The iceberg compromised 6 compartments not 5. The water tight doors made it sink slower not faster because the ship would have capsized instead. It wouldn't have lasted 45 minutes without those watertight compartments.
you know olympic was made out of the same steel and didn't sink even after 3 collisions -_-
Titanic had a bad luck
@@damn6039 seems like any ship related to titanic had bad luck
They say there was a fire in the titanic during construction that weakened the steel
@@djthegrateone yea, i heard about that
@@djthegrateone interesting, thx for info
I came to know the word "imperator" by Emperor Tamarins (Saguinus Imperator), who also, by coincidence just so happen to get their name from Wilhelm II
It is interesting that there is an advertisement for Ocean Gate Titanic tours on the video.
Another inaccuracy is that nobody was flying anywhere in April 1912. The Wright Brothers didn't make their maiden flight until December 1912.
"Titanic was meant to sink"
Thumbnail: Modern cruise ships are made of *aluminium*
Steel and aluminum depending which layer is compared !
@@johnraue5708, you don't have many friends, do you? I'd assume you don't considering you're against humour *and* you like to correct people
Funny thing is they're not
*aluminium foil*
People think it’s the aluminum foil buts it is real aluminum
The Imperator is a straight up Mandela effect for me. I remember the Queen Mary was the biggest ship after the Titanic!!!
yes:)
, Imperator was larger based on leight but on accually tonnage the Olympic class was larger but in 1914 the Vaterland was larger based on tonnage
@@charlesjakesamadan4924 SS Imperator surpassed each Olympic class ship in tonnage and lenght
You know. The titanic had 8 ton anchors. They had a crane that could have moved them. They had the equipment to remove the bolts off the chains and they could have used the crane to throw the anchors over board. That would have gave the Carpathia more time to get there because 32 tons of weight off the ship would have kept her a float longer.
Titanic weighed approximately 52300 tonnes fully loaded, while 32 tonnes sounds like it would have made a difference it really wouldn't have considering she would've been taking on several tonnes of water a second too while sinking
12:33 no, don’t go visit the Titanic, don’t go on the replica. Just leave it alone. I’m not going on a ship unless it’s named the Jessop!