ISO 19650 explained - with example OIR, EIR, BEP (and more) templates [EPISODE 1 of 6]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @prashantkarnik9302
    @prashantkarnik9302 8 місяців тому +1

    Nice of you to share some much information

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  8 місяців тому

      Thank you for your comment! We appreciate your kind words and we're glad that you find the videos helpful! 😍

  • @jocky1027
    @jocky1027 3 роки тому +1

    Very informative. I am so very glad i came across this video as it helped with a piece of Uni coursework. Made me laugh too because my face was like Jeff bridges.

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  3 роки тому

      Haha! 😁 Great that this could help you! 👍

  • @jhcuyh
    @jhcuyh 3 роки тому +3

    Enlightened knowledge 👏🏽

  • @RSFeed
    @RSFeed 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you.

  • @MohammadAli-uo1ph
    @MohammadAli-uo1ph 2 роки тому +1

    ❣ thank you

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  2 роки тому

      We're so grateful for your feedback and glad to hear you enjoyed the video about ISO 19650!

  • @macgiollarua4698
    @macgiollarua4698 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent video! Thanks... Is there ISO guidance on naming of Revit Familes?

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  3 роки тому +1

      You can try BS 8541-1:2012 and also the article linked below shares some great approaches. The main project goal is that everyone agrees and follows the same convention. Importantly you will also want to standardise property naming conventions. ISO 23386:2020 and ISO 23387:2020 are worth reading if you haven't already!
      www.iso.org/standard/75401.html
      www.iso.org/standard/75403.html
      www.revit.com.au/understanding-the-british-standard-object-naming-convention-and-other-alternatives/
      shop.bsigroup.com/en/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030240255
      Thank you for your feedback!

    • @macgiollarua4698
      @macgiollarua4698 3 роки тому

      @@plannerlyAEC amazing thank you

  • @niravrabaidya2812
    @niravrabaidya2812 3 роки тому +1

    Do you have
    ISO 19650-3:2020 pdf? as it conveyed new definition of LOD /LOI

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  3 роки тому

      There are links to the list of all ISO 19650 standards documents in this article (under the heading of "Links to ISO 19650 Standards"): www.plannerly.com/what-is-iso-19650 👍

  • @consaru3640
    @consaru3640 Рік тому

    Hi! How does Plannery encapsulate the Level of information needed out from Milestones/Purpose and put it inside EIR as we all know Level of information needed cannot be specified without a purpose connected to it. Does Plannerly force the Appointing and Lead appointing party to make those pieces of information recorded in the system?

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  Рік тому

      Hi there, 👋 Great question! Yes, Plannerly allows the Purpose to be captured on each Milestone header along with the required deadlines for the Milestone. Once completed (not forced) these can then be reported in the Plan EIR and the Scope for exported contract agreements following Level of Information Need principles 👍

  • @olivecherryblossoms8110
    @olivecherryblossoms8110 3 роки тому

    Hello Plannerly team, could you please explain which phases of a construction project life cycle (Riba PoW) ISO 19650 parts 1, 2, 3, and 5 can be applied to?

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  3 роки тому

      Great question!
      Yes Plannerly can be used to plan work for most of the RIBA Stages:
      Stage 0: Strategic Definition
      Stage 1: Preparation and Briefing
      Stage 2: Concept Design
      Stage 3: Spatial Coordination
      Stage 4: Technical Design
      Stage 5: Manufacturing and Construction
      Stage 6: Handover
      Stage 7: Use
      Mostly the Plan module is used for Stages 0 and 1
      Then including the Scope module for what needs to be done, when and by whom for Stages 2 through 6.

    • @olivecherryblossoms8110
      @olivecherryblossoms8110 3 роки тому

      ​@@plannerlyAEC Thank you for your reply, much appreciated! My understanding is the following:
      19650 parts 1 and 5 should be applied to all of RIBA stages
      19650 part 2 can only be applied to the Delivery stage (RIBA stage 5: Manufacturing and Construction)
      19650 parts 2 and 3 together should be applied to Delivery and Operation stages
      Is this correct or am I missing something? I'm a student and my assignment score depends on this info. Thank you :)

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  3 роки тому

      @@olivecherryblossoms8110 Yes this can be confusing: the ISO 19650-2 standard is applied to “information management during the delivery of built assets” (Excerpt: ISO. “ISO 19650-1:2018.”) - however, the word “delivery” here does NOT refer to a RIBA Stage or Stages. Delivery here is referring to the act of communicating and fulfilling information requirements during what the ISO 19650 standards refer to as procurement, planning and production processes.

    • @olivecherryblossoms8110
      @olivecherryblossoms8110 3 роки тому

      @@plannerlyAEC Thank you

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  3 роки тому

      @@olivecherryblossoms8110 The Plannerly team is here to help - the best of luck with your studies!! 🎓

  • @khaledsaadharas3685
    @khaledsaadharas3685 3 роки тому

    is there a free copy of 1SO 19650

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  3 роки тому +1

      Unfortunately not - the standards are available on the ISO site here: www.iso.org/standard/68078.html - We also have simple video explanations and ISO 19650 templates available here to help: www.plannerly.com/iso-19650-webinar

  • @1021132
    @1021132 2 роки тому

    AIR (ASSET INFORMATION REQUIREMENT) ASSET INFORMATION REGISTER. What are you trying to tell here

    • @plannerlyAEC
      @plannerlyAEC  2 роки тому +1

      Yes, you are correct Praveen! AIR does stand for Asset Information Requirements 👍
      Also, many teams that are not in BIM already refer to these requirements in lists called "registers"
      There are so many terms for BIM and non-BIM teams to agree on 😃

    • @1021132
      @1021132 2 роки тому +1

      @@plannerlyAEC thank you for your response , In your recent videos it is correct. I thought you where refering to some other stuff .
      Thank you for your time.