Hitler's Amerika Bomber - How Germany Almost Reached America

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • Subscribe to Dark Skies: bit.ly/dark5skies
    One of Hitler's most daring dreams during World War II was to burn New York City to the ground. This desire would force through the development of the Amerikabomber project, an initiative undertaken through the Reichsluftfahrtministerium. If completed, the bomber would be able to reach the United States and return to Germany while making an 11,600-kilometer round trip… potentially carrying nuclear weapons. Several aircraft corporations drew up ambitious plans. Some were pursued further than others, even making it to the prototype stage. In the end, it would be a race to complete the Amerikabomber as the Allies were closing in…
    - As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect. I do my best to keep it as visually accurate as possible. All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas. -

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,1 тис.

  • @Zulfburht
    @Zulfburht 4 роки тому +1414

    You know, if Hitler has an obsession with seeing American cities destroyed. He sure as hell would have loved Michael Bay films.

    • @Brian-om2hh
      @Brian-om2hh 4 роки тому +66

      Hitler did actually order a viability study into whether a V2 could be fired from modified U Boats off the US coast. As far as I'm aware, it didn't get past the drawing board.

    • @BaseDeltaZero1972
      @BaseDeltaZero1972 4 роки тому +36

      @@Brian-om2hh Watch a bit of Mark Felton do we? :)

    • @nathanstroud2223
      @nathanstroud2223 4 роки тому +42

      He would've loved most current mayors of major American cities, frankly, especially the antisemitic one in New York.

    • @Brian-om2hh
      @Brian-om2hh 4 роки тому +10

      @@BaseDeltaZero1972 Not as such. I have a fairly small but informative collection of books here, some of which I think are now out of print. One in particular deals with the last few months of the Nazis plans to attempt an attack on the US, New York in particular. A few schemes and plans were considered, one of which was to launch V1's or V2's from submarines. Not that easy, as you might imagine. The Germans did shell the Eastern US coast from U Boats though, along with sinking some coastal shipping.

    • @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs
      @WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 4 роки тому +1

      If Hitler had an obsession with seeing US cities destroyed the Me 264 would have been funded. It wasn’t. The Me 264 V1 with Jumo 211 engines flew in 1941, it languished with insufficient hangers space, draughtsman and engineers being provided by Erhardt Milch. The Me 262 V2 with BMW 801 would have had the range to reach the east coast but lightly armed. It was fast at 340mph and suitable for reconnaissance and perhaps a nighttime mine laying raid or the occasional nuisance raid at night. The takeoff run was a probelm, nearly 2500m of sealed runway was needed. It wasn’t till 1945 till the DB603H with 2400hp or DB603L would have allowed heavy remote controlled canon armament and a descent takeoff run, range and bomb load. If they were serious the Luftwaffe would have funded the Me 264/6m, a 6 engine stretch (also known as the Me 364) , which could have done the job with plain Jumo 211 engines as early as 1942/43 with the range, takeoff, bomb load and armament (b24 liberator Style tail turret with twin 20mm guns). The reality is the Germans, including Hitler, didn’t put the money into it. Goering flatly told American journalists before the war that the idea of bombing the USA was absurd due to the costs, the minimal effect and the provocation it would be seen as by America.

  • @go2mikerenzi
    @go2mikerenzi 3 роки тому +779

    Germany holds the record for "what if" and "almost" videos.

    • @lb7144
      @lb7144 3 роки тому +15

      I know, right!

    • @-Zevin-
      @-Zevin- 3 роки тому +31

      1,000 year Reich! Laughs in Russian: "almost"

    • @pesthizid
      @pesthizid 3 роки тому +24

      @@-Zevin- At least we tried and had the courage. It took not less than the whole world to bring us down.
      What about the russian party in Afghanistan? Wasn`t a big win, was it?

    • @-Zevin-
      @-Zevin- 3 роки тому +28

      @@pesthizid Take your literal Nazi apologetics somewhere else. Disgusting.
      Also what an incredible comparison, the Russian party of Afghanistan? You are considering that an equal failure as compared to the Germans loosing WW2 and getting 8 million of their own people killed in the process?

    • @pesthizid
      @pesthizid 3 роки тому +16

      @@-Zevin- I don`t apologize, for what, i have no reason. But i strucked the cord. Russians laughing about germans, afghanis laughing about russians, i`m laughing about you.
      Btw. Stalin killed a lot more of his own people than little shitler did.

  • @topgeardel
    @topgeardel 3 роки тому +223

    That was a very tall order to expect a plane in the 40s to fly across the Atlantic and back. It would also have to face air defense before it made it to America.

    • @miamijules2149
      @miamijules2149 3 роки тому +20

      Germans had 3 operational Junkers JU390’s stripped down and loaded with extra fuel which had enough range to get from Europe to South America; I’m not sure about air defenses and such but they could and did do it (flight to New York & South America).

    • @natedog3542
      @natedog3542 3 роки тому +4

      A lot of variables. Considering German engineering, it’s not really out of question. As for the aaa and defensive capabilities of their targets, that’s just war games.

    • @eddyheredia8194
      @eddyheredia8194 3 роки тому +10

      They were lucky to have never attacked America's homeland. U see what happened with Japan for hitting Pearl Harbor.. how much worse do you think America would have taken revenge on Germany

    • @topgeardel
      @topgeardel 3 роки тому +9

      @@eddyheredia8194 I understand your thinking but I don't think it was relevant to the situation. Hitler didn't make any sense in his strategy to attack both the Eastern & Western fronts....as well as Africa. I don't think retaliation meant anything to him.

    • @timlewis9873
      @timlewis9873 3 роки тому +8

      If 911 is any indication of our air defense, they more than likely would have bombed us.

  • @michaelf7093
    @michaelf7093 3 роки тому +624

    "The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them." - Sir Arthur Harris

    • @cantbanme792
      @cantbanme792 3 роки тому +37

      lol no, they knew it was possible, they just thought theyd be able to overcome any issues with air superiority, which they did, until they lost their air superiority, even then, from the start till the very end, they were occupied with preventing and then attacking allied bombing runs. in fact, they were more prepared for air attacks than they were ground attacks, they turned their 88 flak into an anti tank gun, not the other way around.

    • @quadroshfu2328
      @quadroshfu2328 3 роки тому +35

      "Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning." - Erwin Rommel

    • @quadroshfu2328
      @quadroshfu2328 3 роки тому +17

      I mean they didn't do too bad considering they were fighting half the world at the same time.

    • @quadroshfu2328
      @quadroshfu2328 3 роки тому

      @RDLONG500 @Michael F

    • @quadroshfu2328
      @quadroshfu2328 3 роки тому +6

      @RDLONG500 "they" were outnumbered 5:1 whats your point?

  • @chegeny
    @chegeny 4 роки тому +628

    The closest production run of the Amerika Bomber was by Revell in 1:72 scale.

    • @El_Presidente_5337
      @El_Presidente_5337 4 роки тому +2

      xD

    • @JW-xj1yf
      @JW-xj1yf 4 роки тому +4

      LOL

    • @steveperreira5850
      @steveperreira5850 4 роки тому +3

      Thanks Cheggy: I was wondering where I could get my hands on one of them. I would just take it on a joy ride, looks like New York has destroyed itself, no real bombers needed, ha ha!

    • @dh98pr16
      @dh98pr16 4 роки тому +23

      @@argumasch663 The bomber existed, but Felton does not say it reached NYC- he say there is a hotly disputed claim about that. Anecdotal evidence, but no documents, including squadron logs, support that.

    • @tubaraofeio1053
      @tubaraofeio1053 4 роки тому +2

      @@argumasch663 nice! love mark felton videos :D

  • @TheWeatherbuff
    @TheWeatherbuff 4 роки тому +139

    If Hermann Göring was to accompany the first mission, there wouldn't have been enough room for his cake and bread requirements. On a serious note, I love this channel!

    • @thorerikkarlsen
      @thorerikkarlsen 3 роки тому +6

      Actually, there wouldn't have been enough room for HIM :)

    • @zorngottes1778
      @zorngottes1778 3 роки тому +4

      @@thorerikkarlsen plenty of room, in the bomb bay. New York would have been destroyed completly with one Göring. The ultimate G-Bomb

    • @kmaterne
      @kmaterne 3 роки тому +2

      Goering was a very rotund man. He looks like a character from a Mel Brooks movie. Lol.

    • @patrickstewart3446
      @patrickstewart3446 3 роки тому +1

      Sure you’re joking… what about his opium paraphernalia?
      😁

    • @randyrobertson6116
      @randyrobertson6116 2 роки тому +1

      LMFAO

  • @deadfreightwest5956
    @deadfreightwest5956 4 роки тому +82

    So Goering's boast that "they'll never bomb this place!" referred to the Luftwaffe and the United States. Got it.

  • @hi-fidude6670
    @hi-fidude6670 4 роки тому +548

    It`s such a Germany WW2 sound name. The AMERIKABOMBER!

    • @Brian-om2hh
      @Brian-om2hh 4 роки тому +6

      That was, I believe, the code name of the project while it was being developed.

    • @redbluesome2829
      @redbluesome2829 4 роки тому +9

      @Hi-Fidude66 there never was an “Amerikabomber” project, that’s just more made up bullshit that the allies concocted to villainize the Germans in the eyes of the American public.

    • @Brian-om2hh
      @Brian-om2hh 4 роки тому +24

      @@redbluesome2829 I'm afraid you are misinformed. Prototypes were built by the companies who were competing for the contract, but both shortages of materials and supplies, brought about by the advancing allied army, brought the project to a halt. Photographs of both the construction and flight testing do exist. There was little need to villanize the Nazis. They managed that quite successfully unaided............

    • @wcsii
      @wcsii 4 роки тому +5

      Hitler’s, before the war.... Armored train was called “Amerika”

    • @bushmanPMRR
      @bushmanPMRR 4 роки тому +2

      Rammstein should use it as a name for an album, maybe including a cover of the MOTORHEAD classic 'Bomber'

  • @oldsklteg
    @oldsklteg 4 роки тому +274

    "BMW engines"? better bring a damn good OBD scanner for that transatlantic flight.

    • @deadfreightwest5956
      @deadfreightwest5956 4 роки тому +15

      Make sure they don't operate when it's raining.

    • @vintagetintrader1062
      @vintagetintrader1062 4 роки тому +11

      You will need to spend a lot of time on the OBD2 scanner killing all the warning codes lol

    • @cooldloop2381
      @cooldloop2381 4 роки тому +5

      I have an old BMW aircraft engine from 1939. Doesn’t work tho. It also has almost the entire back half missing. Including most of the cylinders.

    • @artemborisov8807
      @artemborisov8807 4 роки тому +10

      I think that they were as big of assholes in the sky as they were on the road.

    • @Johannes_Brahms65
      @Johannes_Brahms65 4 роки тому

      These were made in Germany!

  • @carmium
    @carmium 4 роки тому +76

    The V-2 (or A-4) rocket was never designed to reach America. It had nowhere near the range. The A-9 project had America in mind, but never got very far in development.

    • @warrengreen527
      @warrengreen527 4 роки тому +2

      Was also never referred to as the America bomb......

    • @hawkeyeten2450
      @hawkeyeten2450 3 роки тому

      Was that the 2-stage V-2 rocket? I heard there were plans for a longer range rocket to smack places like New York, Boston and Buffalo.

    • @thomashaeyen6942
      @thomashaeyen6942 2 роки тому +1

      @@hawkeyeten2450 the v2 was not designed to reach the US, and the A-9 wasn't called the america bomb, but the america rocket. Duh.

    • @Tbonyandsteak
      @Tbonyandsteak 2 роки тому

      Yeah, but it would be their best choice to make one that could.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 11 місяців тому

      @@thomashaeyen6942 The A9 would have worked, eventually, but there was major work to complete in guidance. The Germans had the beginning of inertial navigation in platforms such as SG-66 with schuler loop tuning and radio becon navigation but a lot of work. They had an option for a manned version with the pilot parachuting out.

  • @MrDK0010
    @MrDK0010 4 роки тому +266

    If it hadn't been for Captain Steven Rogers in 1945, the Walküre would have obliterated the eastern seaboard in just mere minutes.

    • @DEPARTMENTOFREDUNDANCYDEPT
      @DEPARTMENTOFREDUNDANCYDEPT 4 роки тому +15

      Are you serious? Any so-called "Amerika bomber" would have been detected and intercepted over the Atlantic Ocean and blown out of the sky before it ever got to the coast of America.

    • @JimmyEatDirt
      @JimmyEatDirt 4 роки тому +69

      It appears some people haven't crawled out from under their rock for a decade or so.
      Captain America: The First Avenger

    • @dkgamez2985
      @dkgamez2985 4 роки тому +24

      Everyone r/woosh

    • @28291973
      @28291973 4 роки тому +8

      @@DEPARTMENTOFREDUNDANCYDEPT are you special? Or do you live under a rock? Imma go with both

    • @DEPARTMENTOFREDUNDANCYDEPT
      @DEPARTMENTOFREDUNDANCYDEPT 4 роки тому +5

      Ken Kaneki “Imma go with both?” Really? Is English your second language or do you just make up words? I’m not “special” but it seems you might be, as in “Special Education” and “short bus!” You need a better hobby than annoying adults on the Internet with silly, inarticulate, meaningless questions.

  • @michaelmarler7016
    @michaelmarler7016 4 роки тому +53

    So a bomber that was NEVER built "almost" reached America? Do you watch Ancient Aliens often?

    • @Frank119811
      @Frank119811 4 роки тому +5

      This guy is high on something.

    • @apple222sickly
      @apple222sickly 3 роки тому +4

      @@Frank119811
      Mr.bigbrain he meant the range of the bomber was so close for reaching the US

    • @paulcrumley9756
      @paulcrumley9756 3 роки тому +1

      @@apple222sickly Almost reached means. . . wait for it. . .ALMOST REACHED! None of the few prototypes ever came to the production stage, and anecdotes don't prove anyone ever came close to "reaching" the US, even with prototype patrol aircraft, much less with a non-existent Nazi nuke. . .The title is way overexaggerated, but hey, it got our attention, didn't it?

    • @apple222sickly
      @apple222sickly 3 роки тому +1

      @@paulcrumley9756
      Even tho i was jugging you have really good points

    • @chrisstarring2991
      @chrisstarring2991 3 роки тому

      I'm not saying it was Nazis...... But it was Nazis!

  • @robsmithracing
    @robsmithracing 4 роки тому +16

    Downside to long range is they might notice way before you’d even get to the east coast. Pearl Harbour only happened because a small island in the Pacific was caught off guard.

    • @dh98pr16
      @dh98pr16 4 роки тому

      As an aside to this, one-third of American fighter production came from Long Island (Grumman, Republic.) Plus the air bases in the NE and the fighters being shuttled to Europe via Canada and Iceland..

    • @BryanBurdettTOTbox
      @BryanBurdettTOTbox 3 роки тому

      Pearl Harbour is near Singapore and was being used by the USA as a major pacific navel base. Not sure if America and Japan had even declared war on each other when Pearl Harbour was attacked. One of the more sensible Japanese leaders is reported to have said (of the attack) we have awakened a sleeping giant. It all ended with atomic bombs being dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    • @Wombat1916
      @Wombat1916 3 роки тому

      @@BryanBurdettTOTbox Pearl Harbour is 18299 nautical miles from Singapore! Scarcely near! Japan did declare war - after the attack had started! The US replied soon after. It was Admiral Yamamoto who made that famous quote.

    • @Austin.D
      @Austin.D 2 роки тому

      Ikr if Hawaii wasn't a State there would have been no way the Japanese could've reached us at least not without running out of Fuel lol

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 11 місяців тому

      The Me 264 is unlikely to have worked despite good speed and performance. It would have been able to lay mines and make the occasional night raid using ground mapping radar. In general it would need to attack in numbers of several hundred in order to saturate American defenses. It would be quite difficult to keep 500+ aircraft operational.
      -By 1945 it would have had 2400hp DB603H engines of 2400hp with a speed something like 420 mph but that would simply not have been enough.

  • @KAG2203
    @KAG2203 4 роки тому +38

    Could you please talk a little faster, there is still a fragment of a little paus between the words.

    • @michaelawford7325
      @michaelawford7325 3 роки тому +1

      Such a tense staccato speech pattern is quite off putting. Take a break ! relax.

  • @rysi0k110
    @rysi0k110 4 роки тому +176

    This Channel is Underrated

    • @johntechwriter
      @johntechwriter 4 роки тому +5

      Well, this episode is sheer speculation and failed to impress me. I will be wary of future productions from this outfit.

    • @nerino_chan
      @nerino_chan 4 роки тому

      Nah, he was pretty spot on

    • @nerino_chan
      @nerino_chan 4 роки тому +1

      John Techwriter except for the part of about fascination of burning cities

    • @nerino_chan
      @nerino_chan 4 роки тому +2

      Dragomir Ronilac Not Really. It was a totally real event that was close to happening. If the Japanese had reached the US pacific coast and had even sent men to bombard it, It won’t give me a hard time to believe this videos title.

    • @rucco2898
      @rucco2898 4 роки тому

      uh wot he has a PhD on history I think

  • @adamkowalski9559
    @adamkowalski9559 3 роки тому +8

    The BV 238 was also regarded to be used as "America bomber" for some time. But it become destroyed by british air strike just before it started for his first intercontinental flight. Being a flying boat, BV 238 would be refueled on high sea by U-boats. This conception of using bomber flying boats with submarine supply help was operationally used by Japan in II WW and in soviets conceptions in 1960's.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 11 місяців тому

      I don't think the BV-238 had the range. 4110 miles is only half the range needed and refueling a flying boat in the middle of the Atlantic not realistically possible due to both weather and allied patrols.

  • @mikeh7860
    @mikeh7860 4 роки тому +22

    Just when I think I’ve seen or heard of every cool German plane from ww2 I stumble upon a new one

  • @tierone4761
    @tierone4761 4 роки тому +9

    The front of the one bomber in the video ironically resembled the Boeing B29, along with a view of the cockpit as well. Good Day Everyone!

  • @mrwideboy
    @mrwideboy 4 роки тому +70

    Is the narrator on speed?

  • @jjmerrow8062
    @jjmerrow8062 3 роки тому +19

    The Me 264 is basically just a young B-29

    • @packr72
      @packr72 3 роки тому +2

      The B-29 came first.

    • @jjmerrow8062
      @jjmerrow8062 3 роки тому +2

      @@apis_aculei I meant it as a joke because the cockpit looked similar

    • @MartinMizner
      @MartinMizner 3 роки тому

      @@packr72 fun fact good to know

    • @michaeldunne338
      @michaeldunne338 3 роки тому

      The Me 264 was basically a failed strategic bomber prototype and development program. The B-29 gave some serious headaches, but the experience and supporting industry was there - Boeing had already brought into service the B-17 (in 1938).

    • @liamgavinwells
      @liamgavinwells 3 роки тому

      Goeing G-29 Süpër-förtrëss

  • @lorensims4846
    @lorensims4846 4 роки тому +7

    At the same time, America had its own plans for a trans-Atlantic bomber.
    The B-36 wasn't ready until after the war was over but it became the backbone of the Strategic Air Command at the beginning of the Cold War.

    • @jshepard152
      @jshepard152 Рік тому

      Yes. It was predicated on the idea that Britain could fall and the US would have to bomb Europe from North American bases.

    • @franktreppiedi2208
      @franktreppiedi2208 Рік тому

      Wasn't the B 36 built in case Britian fell and we had to bomb Germany from the US?

    • @lorensims4846
      @lorensims4846 Рік тому

      @@franktreppiedi2208 Yup. It was to be our first transatlantic bomber. But WWII was over before it was ready for the Air Corps. It did manage to come into its own in the early years of the Cold War.

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 11 місяців тому

      The XB-15 and XB-19 were started and completed well before the Me 264 and could have bombed Europe from at least Labrador.
      The Me 264 was started after the American Lend Lease Act was signed.
      Both the B-29 and B-36 program started before the Me 264.

  • @shaider1982
    @shaider1982 4 роки тому +49

    Intresringly enough, Hitler's personal train was previously named Amerika.

  • @austin1839
    @austin1839 4 роки тому +5

    Hitler promised his own military that he would NOT declare war until at least 1946. If he'd only have waited then we might all be eating bratwurst and sauerkraut today.

    • @genes.3285
      @genes.3285 4 роки тому +1

      Nah, Hitler knew the limitations of Germany. He wasn't even that enthusiastic about attacking Britain.

    • @greenmtroamer33
      @greenmtroamer33 4 роки тому +1

      If he hadn’t invaded Russia it might have been a different outcome. Luckily he was foolish enough to think he could defend two fronts.

    • @alganhar1
      @alganhar1 4 роки тому +1

      The problem with this kind of statement is that it assumes everyone would have sat back and watched without doing anything themselves. Which is a pretty lazy way of looking at things.
      Let us take Britain for example, what do you think Britain would have done had Hitler instituted the Z Plan for the Kreigsmarine? You think that a nation that lived and died on the strength of its Navy would have done NOTHING? Not by a long shot! They would have enacted the escalation clause of the Naval Treatie and started an expansion of the Royal Navy, including the planned N3 and G3 Battlecruiser and battleships. They would have massively expanded their destroyer program to include far, far more Tribal Class, and give the timescale may have brought in the Battle and Daring Class by the start of a 1946 war. Unlike Germany, Britain had the Naval Construction infrastructure required to comprehensively outbuild the proposed Z Plan in both quantity and quality.
      Then you have the Royal Air Force, which by a start date of 1946 would be seeing aircraft such as the de Haviland Hornet, the Hawker Fury, and other late war aircraft designs entering service at the start of the war. As for the army, the mid war saw the major problem with British Tank design solved, lack of a decent engine, with the advent of the Meteor engine, a de rated merlin specifically designed for tanks. That led by 1944 to the Comet, and by 1945 the first Centurions were entering service, albeit with the 17 pounder rather than the planned 20 pounder.
      You see the problem? Fact is other nations would NOT have stood idly by and watched Hitler ramp up his forces to the extent he had planned. They WOULD have reacted. The Royal Navy had literally decided that 1944 - 1946 was the most likely period for a major war to start and had plans for a full 12 Fleet Carriers and fully replacing all current RN Battleships with modern designs by 1945. Not to mention a quadrupling of the Tribal Destroyer Force from 28 to over a hundred of those superb ships.

    • @coachhannah2403
      @coachhannah2403 4 роки тому

      austin1839 - The arms race and Hitler's insistence on autarky, both set in stone, meant the timetable was forced on Hitler. Things would have REALLY been impossible (but reallygood for everyone else) had Hitler waited.

    • @steve5123456789
      @steve5123456789 4 роки тому

      @@greenmtroamer33 There was no waiting. If the russians invaded Romania to take the oil fields the germans would of lost before the battle even began. He stayed neutral in finnish war for guaranteeing the soviets wouldn't invade romania.

  • @sski
    @sski 4 роки тому +97

    I'm pressing X to Doubt on that "Hitler watching cities on fire porn". I'll need a citation for that.

    • @DerUfo
      @DerUfo 4 роки тому +28

      The winner writes history... and things are then quite one sided afterwards.. remember... power corrupts all things.. including the truth

    • @yowbeatup7259
      @yowbeatup7259 4 роки тому +1

      A facist have a mental breakdown in Berlín city

    • @somethinglikethat2176
      @somethinglikethat2176 4 роки тому +6

      @@DerUfo the first proper historian (Thucydides) was on the losing side. In fact if you look beyond that cheap throw away line you'll see it's not really the case at all. Eg. How many Germans wrote books after the war.

    • @culturallyawake7399
      @culturallyawake7399 3 роки тому +3

      Could of sworn it would of been Churchill and FDR. Anyone remember Dresden? The allies COMPLETLY LEVELED Germany. Hitler didn't want any of this. People need to read what the leaders wrote, and watch the speeches instead of being told by people who weren't there. Even Churchill said "the air opened paths along which death and terror could be carried far behind the lines of the actual enemy; to women, children, the aged, the sick, who in earlier struggles would perforce have been left untouched" - The Great War Vol 3. Page 1602
      Many more quotes as well. People need to realize the truth.

    • @michaelf7093
      @michaelf7093 3 роки тому

      Hitler also liked to watch films of political prisoners being hanged.

  • @coachhannah2403
    @coachhannah2403 4 роки тому +38

    A-bomb: $2+ billion
    B-29: $3+ billion.
    Amerika bomber: not in this universe...

    • @Ebolter1
      @Ebolter1 4 роки тому +1

      the Amerika bomber was very true

    • @coachhannah2403
      @coachhannah2403 4 роки тому

      Joseph Heaney - What would it have done?

    • @Ebolter1
      @Ebolter1 4 роки тому

      @@coachhannah2403 I know , but they were close to developing their own weapons of mass destruction with a bomber that could deliver them

    • @coachhannah2403
      @coachhannah2403 4 роки тому +3

      Joseph Heaney - What WMD might that be? And, no, they were nowhere close to developing, let alone producing, the Amerika.

    • @RedOrm68
      @RedOrm68 4 роки тому +2

      @@coachhannah2403 well, the Third Reich did try to develop its own nuclear weapons, using dideuteriumoxide, or heavy water, from the Hydro-plant in Norway.

  • @alexiszorbec-legras8232
    @alexiszorbec-legras8232 3 роки тому +3

    This aircraft had actually started to be built in an aircraft factory requisitioned in France. I even think he did a few flights just after the war and was curving dangerously.

  • @blackbuttecruizr
    @blackbuttecruizr 3 роки тому +2

    Love the "Ford Aircraft" logo on the lab coat at 16:33.

  • @rudolfabelin383
    @rudolfabelin383 4 роки тому +14

    EDIT!!!!!!!!!!!! 7:56 I was writing the text below as I listened to your video. I hear you mention Hans Pancherz at this time point . I am not aware of Capetown, but if Hans said so, you should take it very seriously. He was a living legend, only one to have flown the JU 248. When I was Chairman of the Malmö Division of the Swedish Society of Aeronautics ans Astronautics I persuaded onkel Hans to hold a lecture of the JU 248. If things had been different at the wars end, the record books would not say Chuck Yeager, but Hans Pancherz instead.
    Here is where I started to write parallel to watching the video:
    Hi! A man I grew up with a man who was the chief test pilot (German: Versuchfliger) of the JU 390. He worked for my father after the war at MFI, Malmö Flygindustri in Sweden. Some of the test flight he made started in Germany, went down to Central Africa and back again (nonstop). As far as I know one of the few uses of it was to fly to South America and back with rare alloy metals. The chief test pilot's name was Flugkapitän Hans Pancherz, he was also an engineer. At the end of the was he was put in charge for the development of all jet and rocket aircraft. It was he who made the Heinkel He 162, Volksjäger, a flyable aircraft after it's problems that killed his predecessor. The flights of JU 390 are not fiction. BTW Flugkapitän Hans Pancherz made the worlds second catapult ejection in a JU 290, not planned. Tail broke in a world record attempt.

    • @rudolfabelin383
      @rudolfabelin383 4 роки тому

      @Mark Gaiennie Yep! What I wrote here is only a small percentage of the people I grew up with. Today, most of these people has passed away.

  • @koukimonzta
    @koukimonzta 3 роки тому +12

    In todays day and age, this is the job of an ICBM

    • @deezem5294
      @deezem5294 3 роки тому +3

      Very important information. Totally would have never known

  • @slojoe58
    @slojoe58 4 роки тому +13

    I'm confused, when did the alien spacecraft come into play?

    • @tonycerino9645
      @tonycerino9645 3 роки тому +1

      They didn't understand the UFO tech at the time, it worked like magic..

  • @silvertalon007
    @silvertalon007 4 роки тому +5

    There was even a Heavy Bomber Version of the Horton-229 conceived, but like the P-1000 Ratte, it never made it off the paper it was drawn on.

    • @marrvynswillames4975
      @marrvynswillames4975 3 роки тому

      @RoughneckMP didn't they tested with an radar that was obsolete by 1942?

    • @marrvynswillames4975
      @marrvynswillames4975 3 роки тому

      besides, the test was with a fully wood model, the actual aircraft would be less stealth due of the steel components

    • @silvertalon007
      @silvertalon007 3 роки тому

      @@marrvynswillames4975 Perhaps... But if the Germans had more time and resources they probably could have worked around that somehow. Its Germany for cryin' out loud.

    • @modelm77
      @modelm77 3 роки тому

      The Germans had. a real talent for drawing cool-looking airplanes.

    • @bert8373
      @bert8373 Рік тому

      Also a great read-Luftwaffe Over Americ by Manfred Griehl

  • @dansotelo228
    @dansotelo228 4 роки тому +3

    To those looking for tangible evidence of this Amerikan airplane, I know where one of the engines exist, and it's massive. For some reason, several rare WW-II German machines and artifacts ended up at LA's Griffith Park train museum in the late 40s and early 50s. I can remember in the late 70s & mid-80s they had a flying Buzz bomb outside rotting away. Also next to a vintage LA Fire ladder truck they had this massive Amerika engine, with a simple plack saying how this engine was captured after WW-II and was to fit on a Massive bomber to drop a nuclear bomb on New York. I'm sure the museum is gone by now so I would check with Griffith Park Museum officials to track down this engine which I think belongs in the Smithsonian.

  • @lafeelabriel
    @lafeelabriel 3 роки тому +3

    Fun fact: If anyone here, other than me of course, has watched Konpeki No Kantai, the TA-400 is clearly where they got the inspiration for the Germans' Jormungand (apt name must be said) heavy bomber in that show.

  • @RottenFlesh-we6nu
    @RottenFlesh-we6nu 4 роки тому +27

    This is almost a german b-29 on the outside

    • @aljayrankin8353
      @aljayrankin8353 4 роки тому +4

      Actually this came first so the b29 would be the American B29 ahhaha

    • @victoregley5359
      @victoregley5359 4 роки тому +1

      design follows function

    • @Helperbot-2000
      @Helperbot-2000 4 роки тому

      @@aljayrankin8353 i guess it is the americaN bomber then?

    • @packr72
      @packr72 3 роки тому +2

      @@aljayrankin8353 Came first? The XB-29 flew first and was already in production before the 264 flew. The B-29 was ready for combat first too.

  • @Gonzalouchikari
    @Gonzalouchikari 4 роки тому +75

    When I see "Amerika" instead of "America", I think in the Rammstein song.

  • @GTP2-zg9tn
    @GTP2-zg9tn 5 місяців тому +1

    Only one plane met the Amerika bomber requirements: the Horten flying wing XVIII six jet engine proposal. It was approved, but the war ended.

  • @crownprincesebastianjohano7069
    @crownprincesebastianjohano7069 3 роки тому +1

    When played at .75 speed it almost sounds like professional voice over work by Richard Kiley. Which is a God-send. My dear fellow speaks so quickly and haltingly that it is somewhat distracting.

  • @ElGrandoCaymano
    @ElGrandoCaymano 4 роки тому +3

    What?? The FW-TA 400 was to carry 53,000lbs in bombs? vs 14k for a Lancaster or 16k for a B-29 Superfortress (or 4.8k for a B-17) A FW TA-400 would carry as much bombs as 11 B-17s - across the Atlantic!

    • @Helperbot-2000
      @Helperbot-2000 4 роки тому

      Now thats alota damage! Of course it would have been way to easy to shoot down over the atlantic

    • @modelm77
      @modelm77 3 роки тому

      A lot of these imaginary planes have spectacular specifications. They take the same horsepower as a B-29 and purport to fly a heavier plane further, higher and faster with a heavier payload, as if they had the ability to produce those powerful engines or scrounge up the fuel to fly them.

  • @InfiltrateIndustries
    @InfiltrateIndustries 4 роки тому +16

    13:17 Doktor Merkwürdigliebe / Dr. Strangelove

  • @KG-li7kg
    @KG-li7kg 3 роки тому

    Zum einen: Diese ME264 war zwar als Langstreckenbomber geplant und sogar mit 1 Exemplar fertig Gebaut. Diese einzige maschine wurde aber während eines Luftangriffes, zerbomt und eine neue Maschine wurde nicht mehr gebaut. Abgesehen davon, soweit war man damals noch nicht, das ein Flugzeug von Deutschland oder einen anderen Punkt von Europa aus, den Flug bis zu den USA und zurück geschafft hätte. Dazu hätte man eine Base als Zwischenstation zum Auftanken haben müssen, was Deutschland aber nicht hatte.
    Es gab ja auch noch andere Mitbewerber, die einen sogenannten "America-Bomber" konstruierten, wie z.B. Junkers mit der JU 390 (6-Motor) . Der kühnste Entwurf stammte ja von den Gebrüdern Horten, die einen "Nurflügler" mit gewaltigen Ausmassen auf dem Papier hatten, doch alle diese Entwürfe waren nur "Heisse Luft". Inzwischen war mit in der Raketenentwicklung sehr weit fortgeschritten, so das man ein Raketenprojekt in Angriff nahm, dies war eine 2-stufige Rakete, die man A9 nannte. Auch von dem Österreichischen Konstrukteur Sänger war ein Entwurf auf dem Zeichenbrett fertig, aber zur Produktion solcher Fluggeräte kam es aus Gründen der Kriegslage nicht mehr.

  • @braddietzmusic2429
    @braddietzmusic2429 3 роки тому +1

    Fascinating stuff, but damn slow down and enjoy giving this narration. It would be more enjoyable for us too. Such fascinating historical info doesn’t need to sound like the the fast-as-possible legal disclaimer at the end of a medical commercial.

  • @kimchipig
    @kimchipig 4 роки тому +5

    Ahhh, WW2 bombing in one of the clips. Most of the bombs dropped blew up dirt in fields.

  • @kurtwpg
    @kurtwpg 4 роки тому +3

    He came so close. If only it had been engineered, tested, flown, and had enough fuel in the country to get it to America.

    • @paulcrumley9756
      @paulcrumley9756 3 роки тому +2

      three more words. . . "and mass-produced." It would take hundreds if not thousands of these dream machines to "reach" the US. A significant percentage likely would have simply crashed into the North Atlantic from glitches in the newly introduced technical stuff; another large percentage would have had to fight their way through the coastal defenses, and if the US could produce enough fighters to use in Europe, diverting a small percentage to homeland defense would have been trivial.

    • @modelm77
      @modelm77 3 роки тому +1

      @@paulcrumley9756 Yes, and after the first attack with 10 of the 24 bombers dispatched getting to the target and having managed to drop a combined 20 tons of bombs, many of which would have exploded, over the greater NYC metropolitan area, any future raids would have been met with swarms of Corsairs and Hellcats from hastily-redeployed escort carriers starting about 1,500 miles offshore and shot into the Atlantic in droves. That's assuming the Germans had the capability to produce hundreds of bombers, which they didn't, or to provide them with trained aircrew, which they couldn't, or to provide the fuel for them, which they couldn't either. Several of these prototypes were destroyed in Allied air attacks; why would anyone think they could produce a strategically important bombing force unmolested? They'd be bombed into dust.

    • @Zhoolik
      @Zhoolik Рік тому

      @@modelm77 Yep, it would have been an ineffective one-and-done. Besides starting a genocidal, unjustified war of aggression upon millions of innocent people, the second mistake was expending one's air force with insufficient resources to replace in the Battle of Britain in 1940. Putin is experiencing a similar fate with his tank army in the Ukraine. "Where are my T-90's!?"

  • @robinsattahip2376
    @robinsattahip2376 Рік тому

    I like the Ford logo on the engineer @6:16 corporations don't care which side they work for.

  • @MoveAhead101
    @MoveAhead101 4 роки тому +1

    A Focke Wulf Fw 200 V1 „Condor“ flew on the 10. of August 1938 non-stop from Berlin to New York. You make it sound, that this was impossible to fly those distances at that time. Such a plane is currently undergoing restoration in Bremen and Hamburg and will be on display in Berlin.

    • @Zerzayar
      @Zerzayar 4 роки тому

      Well, it had to land and be refueled, hadn't it?

    • @MoveAhead101
      @MoveAhead101 4 роки тому

      Zerzayar yes, but some people were so fanatic, they would have died if „necessary“

    • @modelm77
      @modelm77 3 роки тому

      Cool. Now turn around and fly back after having carried 4,000 lbs of bombs on the outward journey.

  • @_Patton_Was_Right
    @_Patton_Was_Right 4 роки тому +28

    "WE DEFEATED THE WRONG ENEMY!" They killed Patton for speaking the truth

    • @barrierodliffe4155
      @barrierodliffe4155 3 роки тому

      Patton got himself in the way of a vehicle. He died and he was not exactly very intelligent.

  • @blakena4907
    @blakena4907 4 роки тому +3

    Your channel is amazing. Thanks for the awesome content, man.

  • @grahambell5340
    @grahambell5340 2 роки тому +1

    The V2 was never an Amerika Rocket .(15.15 into the programme) He must be thinking of the A9/A10 project , This is generally an excellent series

  • @enscroggs
    @enscroggs 4 роки тому

    The scheme to arm u-boats with V-2 ballistic missiles was comprehensive enough that the USN studied it in detail several years after the USS United States, an early type of "supercarrier" intended for strategic nuclear strike, was canceled in 1949. The German plan called for the rocket to be towed horizontally behind its mothership submarine, probably at Type IXC long-range boat, housed within a watertight canister. The canister was to have ballast tanks to allow it to be towed submerged as well as compressed air tanks to allow it to float on the surface for final preparation prior to launching. When the target area was reached, somewhere near United States territorial waters, the canister would be turned vertical by means of floodable tanks in its stern. The V-2 would have been fueled with a full load of 75% alcohol before being sealed in its canister, however, the liquid oxygen component would have to be loaded just before firing. This was not a problem for normal land-based V-2 operations because a special tanker truck had been developed to transfer LOX from a railway car to the launching site which held enough oxidizer to both fuel up the V-2 and simultaneously allow for the inevitable "boil-off" loss. Transporting enough LOX within the mothership was seen as completely impractical. Consequently, the plan called for an LOX generating plant to be installed in the u-boat in place of its stern torpedo room. However, the plan was abandoned before the engineering was worked out.
    In 1955 the USN was interested in deploying a version of the United States Army's Jupiter missile at sea, preferably aboard submarines. The Jupiter was fueled with kerosene/liquid oxygen, which presented the Navy with the same LOX problem that faced the Germans. However, as many American nuclear submarines of the 1950s were much larger than any WWII German u-boat, space and electric power for a LOX generating plant were readily available. The vexing problem was space for the missile itself. Since LOX is only slightly more dense than water a long-range nuclear-armed missile using LOX must necessarily be quite large. The Jupiter was 60 feet high and almost nine feet in diameter, which made it too tall to fit inside any submarine pressure hull then in service or in development. To address this issue the Navy considered an advanced version of the German towed canister solution. They also considered using a greatly enlarged sail to accommodate the excess height -- almost 20 feet -- of the Jupiter in a manner similar to the Soviet Golf-II SSB. Both were rejected when the Polaris missile entered development, a weapon designed specifically for submarine deployment. The Polaris was less than half the height of the Jupiter rocket and was only 54 inches in diameter, yet its range and payload were almost equal to the much larger Army missile. Furthermore, its advanced solid propellant made all the liquid fuel complications disappear at a stroke. Existing Skipjack-class attack subs could be modified to carry sixteen Polaris missiles, whereas the most ambitious plans for a Jupiter submarine fleet foresaw a strike force of only three missiles per boat.

  • @Jumpy-xv7gk
    @Jumpy-xv7gk 4 роки тому +57

    Hey dark docs your awesome

    • @FireAngelZero
      @FireAngelZero 4 роки тому +9

      All the “Dark” series are awesome, “Dark Skies” and “Dark footage” are my favorites...

    • @Commander800
      @Commander800 4 роки тому

      This

    • @FireAngelZero
      @FireAngelZero 4 роки тому

      Trump Super Majority 2020 yes... I wonder that constantly... they do a very good job at staying “dark”

  • @Lenoch_
    @Lenoch_ 4 роки тому +3

    1:10 “Official plans for a long-range bomber officially didn’t commence...” redundant writing asf

  • @nathanhatfield8790
    @nathanhatfield8790 4 роки тому +11

    I’ve never heard f this Hitler guy but he seems driven.

    • @bruceghent8776
      @bruceghent8776 4 роки тому

      Where have you been living and not heard of Adolph Hitler?

    • @opoxious1592
      @opoxious1592 4 роки тому +1

      Me neither.
      Seems like an inpressive fellow.

    • @marksides9757
      @marksides9757 4 роки тому

      The fact that there are two people who have never heard of Hitler is freakin scary. The fact that Education has neglected or deleted this is also freakin scary. To forget, or in this case be ignorant of, history is to repeat it.

    • @nathanhatfield8790
      @nathanhatfield8790 4 роки тому

      opoXIous and what’s with all the anger that I haven’t heard of him?? So now I need to know every person that ever lived. I’m not saying I agree with everything he did, just that he seemed really motivated

    • @opoxious1592
      @opoxious1592 4 роки тому

      @@nathanhatfield8790 I don't understand your reply.
      Why so angry?
      I'm just confirming your statement.
      I also never hear about that Hitler guy. I looked him up, and i just said "Hitler"" seems to be quite an impressvie fellow.
      Nothing More.

  • @Carlschwamberger1
    @Carlschwamberger1 4 роки тому +1

    The Italians put a plan on paper, to refuel a flying boat mid Atlantic from a submarine. Other than undependable weather it was a reasonable plan.

  • @jimmccormick6091
    @jimmccormick6091 3 роки тому +1

    There is a hell of a lot of artistic license taken here.

  • @debbiewilliamson3286
    @debbiewilliamson3286 4 роки тому +5

    6:16 why is that Engineer wearing a FORD School coat?

    • @RobertGarcia-wv8vx
      @RobertGarcia-wv8vx 3 роки тому +1

      @Debbie Williamson ,
      Um, "You can afford a Ford" ?
      Leave it to a woman to notice clothes. Hahahahaha

    • @debbiewilliamson3286
      @debbiewilliamson3286 3 роки тому

      @@RobertGarcia-wv8vx I work for Ford, hence my interest and yes I can afford one

    • @RobertGarcia-wv8vx
      @RobertGarcia-wv8vx 3 роки тому

      @@debbiewilliamson3286 , Hahahaha. Do you eat Little Debbies?
      They are great with coffee in the morning.

    • @jshepard152
      @jshepard152 Рік тому

      I can't speak to the specific footage, but Ford had factories in Germany during WW2. If memory serves, Ford even made the US Congress compensate it for bombing one of them.

  • @Soildus
    @Soildus 4 роки тому +9

    Great video as always. But I thought the Horten 18 was the only bomber Germany planned to bomb America with. Anyways, please do a video on it and the Horten 229!

    • @puremaga17
      @puremaga17 4 роки тому +1

      Horten 229?.. Horten 229.. oh you mean the prototype for Jack Northrop's YB-49 and the B-2. Yup!

    • @farmazoniarz
      @farmazoniarz 4 роки тому +3

      @@puremaga17 no he means Ho 229 you stoopid freeaboo

    • @puremaga17
      @puremaga17 4 роки тому

      @@farmazoniarz Joking sarcasm sometimes does not come across via text.. just like your post.. But how the heck did you know I was a freeaboo.. that's classified 😜

  • @stevemc01
    @stevemc01 2 роки тому +1

    “Sir? The Germans are building a new bomber. Our intelligence reports are confirming the Luftwaffe is building something codenamed ‘AMERIKA’.”
    “…so a new bomber to hit Ottawa?”
    “Idk, man. Maybe for Canada? Maybe for Moscow? London again?”

  • @ulrichgebhard7366
    @ulrichgebhard7366 3 роки тому +1

    This would be more enjoyable to listen too with a slower narration that doesn't swallow the last part of every sentence prior to a pause

    • @racerxr2
      @racerxr2 3 роки тому

      0.75x makes these videos so much better

  • @wynterr7862
    @wynterr7862 4 роки тому +28

    Ah yes, Germany managed to forget about the concept of stealing

    • @5777Whatup
      @5777Whatup 4 роки тому +3

      I think they did it well. Our bomb sights and all.

    • @lairdcummings9092
      @lairdcummings9092 4 роки тому +5

      When they could, they did. They copied from observation, too. Bottom line, though, is that until mid-war, the Germans had little practical need to swipe much. Their technology was mature, and roughly comparable to their foes, where it wasn't actually superior.
      By the time the Germans *needed* to start swiping ideas, it was already much too late.

    • @5777Whatup
      @5777Whatup 4 роки тому +4

      Laird Cummings well everyone of Hitlers commanders told him not to move until 1945. He didn’t listen. Oh boy if he had of... they might of been able to do something hmm 🤔

    • @5777Whatup
      @5777Whatup 4 роки тому +9

      Barbarossa was really what fucked them. Dunkirk and not rolling on the BEF was a big mistake. Hindsight is 20/20

    • @lairdcummings9092
      @lairdcummings9092 4 роки тому

      @@5777Whatup that's what happens when you let a corporal run your wars.

  • @tapio83
    @tapio83 4 роки тому +3

    Btw I prefer playing this at 0.75 speed - makes it somehow easier listening

  • @ethan8661
    @ethan8661 Рік тому

    In 9:33 scenes, Kurt Tank designed Ta 400 mixed-powered(six BMW 801E radial piston engines, two Junkers Juno 004 turbojet engines) strategic bomber is fantasy and nice pretty good, Ta 400 use powerplant by BMW 801E engines(deploying about at 1,975hp) and Junkers Juno 004 turbojet engines(deploying about at 9.7 kN), They originally planned for BMW 802 or DB 604 or Jumo 223 engine, But three new and over 2,000hp engine has tested to fail and no massive production, They have use BMW 801E radial piston engine and Juno 004 turbojet engine to give Ta 400, And that try to use BMW 801Q(turbocharger) or 801R(two stage four speed supercharger) give Ta 400 more flying high speed and high altitude to deporting Ta 400 strategic bomber version, But it is never exists upgrade project.

  • @daviddavis697
    @daviddavis697 3 роки тому

    Smithsonian has an air and space annex here in Chantilly, VA--they have a German WW2 bomber with 2 jet engines--they were almost able to bomb NYC

  • @22vx
    @22vx 4 роки тому +16

    This failure saved Germany from nuclear obliteration.

    • @billdewahl7007
      @billdewahl7007 4 роки тому +4

      Or...time did.

    • @GodKing_Guts
      @GodKing_Guts 4 роки тому +5

      @@oem42 bro they had no idea about that stuff at the time. Legit just yeeted a new bomb on japan amd tested them for years after. That's why we understand radiation and its dangers

  • @officeran9581
    @officeran9581 4 роки тому

    Fun fact both Japan and america both had similar plans to this. Project z was the Japanese equivalent of the amerikabomber, with 3 bombers proposed the g5n, g10n, and ki-91. With the g5n having a few prototypes, ki-91 having a prototype 60% done, and g10n having no prototypes probably because this plane was planned to bomb NYC from the home island than fly to France to refuel. B-36 was the American equivalent and it was meant to bomb Germany if the the British island has been conquered. B-36 actually flew in 1946.

  • @ghostman3398
    @ghostman3398 3 роки тому

    Goering warned Hitler about making war in 1939,he told Hitler that the Luftwaffe wasnt ready and would not be ready for another 10 years.Georing was a pilot, a decorated one at that ,he knew Germany didnt have the resources yet or the production capacity to take on the allies.But Hitler was very medicated by his doctor and had delusions of possessing more capabilities than he really did.Its a classic case of a war lord not listening to his generals.

  • @richardque4952
    @richardque4952 4 роки тому +3

    Hitler obsession of bombong ny puzzle me.when the real threat come from gigantic tank factory in the ural.

    • @DerUfo
      @DerUfo 4 роки тому

      Good Old Adolf figured if bombers did a run on NYC the americans would not want to continue with the war and a peace treaty could be made to end the war all over...

    • @littlejimmy8744
      @littlejimmy8744 4 роки тому +1

      @@DerUfo No he smarter than that it was just a revenge thing your bomb our cities we bomb your big city.

    • @DerUfo
      @DerUfo 4 роки тому

      @@littlejimmy8744 could be quite correct... either way... only innocent people would be the victims. The people calling the shots rarely are, until one completely loses...

  • @johngaltman
    @johngaltman 4 роки тому +6

    In the future, please provide references, especially when saying what other people thought about and what they wanted in the future... I can say Napoleon wanted to burn Baghdad, he enjoyed thinking about it, and looked at paintings of it all the time... But, if I can't give a primary reference to such a ridiculous idea, then I am simply a liar...

    • @larrymoran_THE_CODGER
      @larrymoran_THE_CODGER 3 роки тому +3

      I thought the same thing while watching this video. As of Nov. 2020, the "News" media are still making claims about what some politicians think or thought, with no way of verifying their claims.

    • @miamijules2149
      @miamijules2149 3 роки тому +2

      Yeah, had the same comment. Lol

  • @Colonel_Obvious
    @Colonel_Obvious 3 роки тому +1

    Germany did reach America. With U-boats. The waters along North America’s eastern coast is littered with ships sunk by U-boats. And with sunken U-boats. Allied countermeasures turned the tide, just as they would have done in the air if needed. A relative few German long range bombers would not have been decisive.

  • @SanderAnderon
    @SanderAnderon 4 роки тому +1

    learned a lot here...your research, production & narration are always TV/doc broadcast quality

  • @ARBBFamily
    @ARBBFamily 4 роки тому +4

    16 minutes of "almost"....Almost as in "Not Even Close"

  • @johnfoster535
    @johnfoster535 4 роки тому +3

    Hitler's last words : " Next time........no more " Mr. NICE GUY' " !!!!

    • @jshepard152
      @jshepard152 Рік тому

      Also....this applesauce tastes funny.

  • @partygrove5321
    @partygrove5321 3 роки тому +1

    It took a 1000+ planes to start the Hamburg firestorm and they only had to fly 500 miles. A few of these making cross Atlantic bombing raid on NYC would do squat.

    • @partygrove5321
      @partygrove5321 3 роки тому

      Though if they did even manage to drop a couple of bombs on Manhattan, that would have caused the US to divert 100s of planes and AA guns to NYC and tied up the City for weeks

  • @yankeeclipper4326
    @yankeeclipper4326 3 роки тому +1

    Rumor has it that one of these did make it to the usa. It supposedly crashed off the coast of Maine in Casco Bay and was covered up by the military.

    • @tempestfury8324
      @tempestfury8324 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah right. Oh, it's another "military cover-up".

    • @jshepard152
      @jshepard152 Рік тому

      Surprised it didn't crash in Roswell.

  • @failing2improve17
    @failing2improve17 4 роки тому +3

    very epic video thanks

  • @omerashraf9357
    @omerashraf9357 4 роки тому +1

    I want to point out some mistakes in the episode The Soviet Red Star MiGs That Weren't Supposed to Exist in the Korean War. First of the North Korean Air Force used the IL 10 Strike aircraft which was developed from the famous WW2 IL 2 Sturmovik. Secondly i don't think the IL 28 was used during the war as I cannot find about its combat record in Korea. Rather the WW2 era Tupolev Tu-2 was used
    .

  • @S1lverspike
    @S1lverspike 2 роки тому

    This channel is seriously underrated.

  • @cesarebeccaria7641
    @cesarebeccaria7641 3 роки тому +2

    From everything I've read, Germany and Japan took opposite extreme wrong approaches to weapons. Germany devoted too much effort into research and development of new designs in aircraft and submarines. Japan spent the war manufacturing essentially the same aircraft, subs and ships they had at the beginning of the war. Both methods failed. Germany never had enough working planes, with the miracle plane coming; Japan was woefully obsolete by 1944. American approach was to develop to a point, then go to manufacture, allowing incremental improvements afterward. The Mustang and B17 are great examples of aircraft from that approach. The Gato and Balao class submarines won the war in the Pacific, in spite of BurOrd's galactic failure in torpedo design.
    Germany's only hope for a New York bombing would have to have been some variation on the Doolittle raid of Tokyo, except Germany's planes would have no place to go afterward, and would have to plan to ditch at some predetermined U-boat pickup point, assuming a U-boat could survive long enough.

    • @HappyBeezerStudios
      @HappyBeezerStudios Рік тому

      Germany was basically developing their war equipment for the 1950s. All great projects in theory, that would work amazingly well, in theory. From long range bombers to jet fighters to intercontinental missiles to properly armed submarines to the modern assault rifle. All stuff that would come around in the 1950s & 60s. But not stuff needed at that point in a war that was full of wrong decisions to begin with.
      The only real point in directly attacking the US mainland would be after Europe is secured as a message to stay away. A bit like a mirror to the Monroe doctrine.

  • @hellohun7331
    @hellohun7331 4 роки тому +7

    In retrospect burning NYC to the ground might have been a good thing.

    • @theduck3876
      @theduck3876 4 роки тому +4

      when you consider what it is now absolutely

    • @theenglishmajor1198
      @theenglishmajor1198 4 роки тому +2

      Well I think Seattle would have been a better choice considering the things going on in America today.

    • @DunedinMultimedia2
      @DunedinMultimedia2 4 роки тому

      Nazi much? LOL

    • @theduck3876
      @theduck3876 4 роки тому

      @@DunedinMultimedia2 bruh you best be joking

  • @ianmacfarlane1241
    @ianmacfarlane1241 4 роки тому +8

    "the V-2 or America rocket..."
    What?
    When was the V-2 referred to as the America rocket?

    • @NielsC68
      @NielsC68 4 роки тому +1

      It wasn't?

    • @zapfanzapfan
      @zapfanzapfan 4 роки тому +3

      No, the V2 was not the Amerika rocket but there were plans for a two stage rocket where the second stage was a V2. That might have reached across the Atlantic. V2 could reach London if launched from France/Belgium/Netherlands.

    • @barrierodliffe4155
      @barrierodliffe4155 3 роки тому

      @@zapfanzapfan
      About 200 miles for the V 2 but terrible accuracy, imagine over 3,000 miles and how far off target it would be.

    • @modelm77
      @modelm77 3 роки тому

      @@barrierodliffe4155 Amerika is pretty big tho. You may drop your V-2 into a lake in Maine but at least it hit Amerika

  • @bongwelll
    @bongwelll 2 роки тому +1

    Man I love this channel. Even the name is great.

  • @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869
    @ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869 3 роки тому

    The technology already existed for the Amerika bomber.
    In the 1930s Junkers had developed an opposed piston engine that was so efficient that it could fly over 6000 miles on a top up.

  • @jeppeolsson7852
    @jeppeolsson7852 4 роки тому +5

    Very interesting video, but man this guy talks very fast!

  • @paulhammerich9244
    @paulhammerich9244 4 роки тому +1

    German engineering was and is incredible. This bomder would have a devastating effect on America's economy and war effort. The "V" rocket program was scary. It was a great air program by the allies put an end to Germany's was effort. Thank you for the interesting video.

  • @steveee4957
    @steveee4957 2 роки тому +2

    Even if Germany was successful in producing an Amerika bomber, they would have been shot down in droves because they would have made the trip without fighter escort.

  • @ShredSpaghed
    @ShredSpaghed 4 роки тому +3

    Hey man, big fan of all your channels and love the consistency of adding new content on the regular.
    I had been waiting for your take on the ME 264 !
    Would you consider a take on the flying boats, more specifically, the Short Sunderland series?
    They were so damn cool. A LOT of the flying boats were, and I just love them all. Thanks for your consideration!

  • @danh8302
    @danh8302 3 роки тому +1

    It is strange to me hearing that BOTH Imperial Japan and Hitler thought if you just hit America hard enough, they would bow out. I can only assume they were mistaking the American populace and their desire to avoid endless European conflict especially after WW1 where they felt all those americans were not authorized to be used for European political fights. if you make it their fight, it might be bad for you.
    Ostensibly japan attacked pearl to cripple the immediate response to taking the Philippines. The problem is you attacked something that was viewed as homeland and killed 3,000 Americans. They targeted battleship row for the image of it, ironically the image was powerful of the burning battleship row. Yet they were largely of secondary importance to the fleet however they give a lot of momentum behind the sentiment to grind the enemy to dust for doing it.
    I am confident that there is a high probability that had Japan simply taken the Philippines and let the americans that were there, go and not attacked pearl. Then they would have succeeded in taking the pacific. Perhaps you would have a USN response which would very likely be repelled by a more professional IJN at that moment. Then the American public would have said “why should we authorize that fight??”. We were basically already hot with Germany in the Atlantic.
    Japan could have “won” WW2 just like they were the clear winners of WW1, taking all the european territories opportunistically.

  • @paulrandig
    @paulrandig 3 роки тому

    Well made, thank you. But: Why do you alway wait a few moments to then burst out the whole sentence in a high tempo? Talking a little bit quieter and regular would be so much better to understand.

  • @MostlyPennyCat
    @MostlyPennyCat 4 роки тому +7

    "Return to Germany" 😂😂
    It was always a one way trip.

  • @davidweber5833
    @davidweber5833 4 роки тому +9

    They never really pursued the atom bomb. They considered it “jewish physics.”

    • @thomaschilcott
      @thomaschilcott 4 роки тому +7

      Nazi Germany most certainly did pursue the atom bomb! Nazi scientists (including Heisenberg) were working on producing heavy water (Deuterium) in occupied Norway, in a town called Rjukan. There were various saboteur efforts, culminating in an explosives raid on the heavily defended belly of the Vermork Power Plant itself. These attacks were instrumental in denying the Nazis access to Deuterium and thus a nuclear weapon. See "The Heroes of Telemark" for further reference.

    • @muysli.y1855
      @muysli.y1855 4 роки тому +1

      Jewish physics ? What a bs u read

  • @kineticdeath
    @kineticdeath 3 роки тому

    i was hoping for a brief honorable mention of the Sanger Amerika Bomber. They did build a scale wind tunnel model... so it wasnt all just a matter of talk. Of course it probably would have failed on the first test anyway

  • @Pootycat8359
    @Pootycat8359 2 роки тому

    WE had a "Germany bomber"! It was the B-19. It was essentially a "super-sized" B-17. The idea was to have a bomber that could depart from the U.S, cross the Atlantic and bomb Europe, and return home, in the event that Britain fell to the Germans. A prototype was built & tested. But it never went into production, because it wasn't needed.

  • @samiam5557
    @samiam5557 4 роки тому +1

    The German's didn't have enough petrol after 1942. The German's never built a Heavy bomber, even this one didn't have nearly the payload of a B-24. The German's didn't have enough rare metals either.

  • @dushooter
    @dushooter 4 роки тому +2

    Great job on the research and presentation!!! Keep it coming.

  • @danphariss133
    @danphariss133 4 роки тому +4

    They never had a chance. The P47s would have slaughtered them.

  • @ibtgb2
    @ibtgb2 3 роки тому

    Did he say there were plans to carry a nuclear weapon on board? In 1938? Cause the Manhattan Project was still going and we didn’t bomb Hiroshima for years after that so I’m confused.

  • @joannawie
    @joannawie 4 роки тому +6

    I is not "meshershmyt" but "mesershmyt" - "s", not "sh". Try it.

    • @petes0746
      @petes0746 4 роки тому +5

      Im sure his life will be more successful now with that gem of advice.

    • @Stangy04
      @Stangy04 4 роки тому +3

      @@petes0746 lol

    • @diddidadda1
      @diddidadda1 4 роки тому

      Nobody said you were , unless you meant 'It is not' ? and by that I take it you must mean the plane ?

    • @giovannimorrisone483
      @giovannimorrisone483 4 роки тому +1

      Mein Gott! Perhaps zere kould be nasty punishment for fellow who say Cherman vord rong! Ja Joannawie, I try it and vass really happy feeling for me!

  • @MrThatnativeguy
    @MrThatnativeguy 4 роки тому +3

    Holy hell, with a name like amerikabomber you can see what was in store for the U.S at the time

    • @kyle857
      @kyle857 4 роки тому +2

      Nothing. Germany was getting its shit kicked in by then.

    • @coryfice1881
      @coryfice1881 4 роки тому +1

      Those bored anti air units stationed at the homefront would of finally had a turkey shoot.

    • @jshepard152
      @jshepard152 Рік тому

      No worrries. P-51 Mustangs needed targets by then.

  • @christophercripps7639
    @christophercripps7639 3 роки тому

    Good thing Hiltler was obsessed with cities. What Germany could've used was a long range maritime plane and 100s of Fritz X guided anti-ship bombs. With these the UK fleet might've been swept from the Mediterranean and North Seas.

  • @casinodelonge
    @casinodelonge 4 роки тому +1

    Si imagine what would have happened if Jerry Hun had won the Battle of Britain and not invaded Russia. It's a sobering thought.

  • @whitehurstcomic
    @whitehurstcomic 3 роки тому +3

    Antifa could show him how to damage American cities.

    • @noone3272
      @noone3272 3 роки тому

      Too bad. He killed ANTIFA thugs in the streets of Germany to get to power