This was such an exciting time. I knew all the Mercury astronauts names and would faithfully watch each blast off. I was 10 during the Mercury program.
I followed the space program in the 60's. I used to make and fly model rockets from Estes, balsa wood nose cones and fins, cardboard tube bodies and solid rockets. The magazine had all the rockets, even the German V-2. However, not a single model from the then USSR. It was an interesting time for sure. I was just a kid, and didn't realize how important the space program was, it was just a blast making and shooting them off. The crowning jewel in the catalog was the mighty Saturn V.
I remember all of it, exactly as you have recollected..."the mighty Saturn V"...have you ever noticed how everything space related is named after Roman gods?
I use to build and launch Estes rockets 🚀 as well. Now it’s my sons turn to learn the wonderment of flying model rocketry!!! He’s only 4, but I can’t wait to build and launch with him. “D” engines were the best because of the slow lift off. 👍🏻
I, also followed the space program, and built model rockets from Estes and still build custom rockets to launch. The original 7 astronauts were my heroes.
So interesting to watch this in 2021, knowing how the story ends and the sacrifices it took to get there. RIP Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee.
Great video...a real 'time capsule' (pardon the pun LOL) of manned space flight in the 60's. The Timex ads are killer as well! LOL. I have to say, Periscope Film really does a great job providing interesting content. It stumps me how some guy with a bass and a few bad jokes can get 9 million subs yet this channel can only get 354,000 subs. This channel deserves many more.
People don't like to learn they want to be entertained and move onto the next entertainment. No research, no history, just what's next and what can keep my focus next History is important, especially this type of stuff in today's day and age
Thanks very much. Love our channel? Help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.
"I see no military advantage in going to the Moon" 😂 I'm 55 years old. I grew up in the shadow of the Space Race. It spawned a lot of technology that we take for granted today. It gave us economic and technological superiority over the rest of the World. How is that NOT a military advantage? 🤦♂️
NASA launched Apollo 12 in 1969, it travelled over 240K miles to the moon and landed precisely less than 100m away from its target, the previously launched Surveyor probe. The Soviets immediately realized exactly how far ahead the US was in engineering and space science. 20 years later, the final straw was the proposed Star Wars missle defense program. The end of the cold war soon followed. Combined with all the other advancements in electronics and other benefits for consumers and it is clear to see why Apollo was more than worth it.
"economic and technological superiority over the rest of the World. " Apollo did NOT give the USA such advantage. What are you talking about? The USA lost every of its military engagements since WWII.
@@RideAcrossTheRiver What are you talking about? Do you see the words 'military superiority' in the man's statement? I don't. He said technological and economic superiority. Nothing about fighting wars at all.
@@origamimambo545 Your reading skills are faulty--probably on purpose here. Read the original statement: _"It spawned a lot of technology that we take for granted today. It gave us economic and technological superiority over the rest of the World. How is that NOT a military advantage?"_
Excellent footage of the building of the physical equipment of the space program. I was just at the Johnson Space Center and visited the old Apollo control room. It is fantastic. Its ALL original equipment and they have developed a presentation that goes through the final five minutes of the Eagle landing on the moon and ALL monitor readouts and television screens and buttons are as they were as it happened. Definitely must see if youre into Apollo history.
Did they have the full "slide projection system" that was on the engineer's screens? I saw a clip or presentation about that very complex system, a marriage of television and data display. The television part was slides of the text, the data was the appropriate data being displayed/overlaid/merged onto the Mission Control green-screen displays. It may have been a Cape Kennedy or a JSC (or both) system, I don't recall.
I have a difficult time understanding how the designers and engineers didn't see the hazards of filling the Apollo 1 capsule with pure oxygen. We already had many years experience with underwater diving, building and operating submarines, and confined spaces aboard ships. What the H3ll were they thinking?
Failure of imagination. On orbit, the cabin would be at 5psi of pure oxygen, which is reasonably safe. But to simulate the pressure differential on the ground, they had to go a few psi *over* atmospheric pressure - 16 psi of oxygen - which is obviously deadly. Everyone thought the disaster would occur during launch or on orbit; a disaster during a pad test was just unimaginable.
You need to look at more than the one (unnecessary) ground failure to decide it was a bad idea. A pure oxygen atmosphere means that they can run the cabin pressure at 20% of normal sea-level conditions. That's 3.2 PSI. If you figure out the number of square inches on the inside of that capsule, that is a heck of lot of pounds of hoop strength required, and a heck of a lot of pressure on doors to not blow out, and hoses in the air conditioning system (which was outside of the capsule where they couldn't get to it to do anything) to try to fix something. If they had run air, all of that would have needed to be 5 times stronger. And heavier. And more likely to fail. All of those were not good outcomes. The main problem with the ground capsule fire is that they ran pure oxygen in the capsule _at standard atmospheric pressure_, so there was 5 times as much oxygen available as there would have been in space. This was a stupidly bad decision on the part of the whoever made it, and there were engineers at the time that complained it shouldn't be done. Like the engineers at the Challenger launch that said it was out of spec, they were ignored, and it turns out luck ran out in both cases.
At 23 minute mark listen to the science guy with heavy German accent talk about beating the Russians “this time” very telling remark. Thank you for posting.
@@suekennedy8917 The Moon isn't radioactive but, yes, radiation on the lunar surface was well assessed by 1969. The Moon's surface is basalt, feldspar, and olivine. All are common minerals in the inner solar system.
They would have been surprised. And doubly surprised to learn that an African immigrant built the company currently used to send astronauts and tourists to space.
frames of the film.... standard frame rate for film cameras was 24 frames per second, for video it's 30 frames per second. The counter they put on the film is counting 1-24 every second. Later! OL J R :)
@@victormuckleston And may you never lose the thirst for knowledge. These days a trait like that is considered racist and based on supremacy... So be it...
All that money for Universities and colleges back then would have been agreed by most was a good thing for the nation. Now near half the population thinks schooling may lead to their daughters and sons becoming enemies of traditions, family and home. Sad
It's amazing what mankind can do when cost is not an issue. There are many reasons to go to the moon. We are now. In a couple years. Think about a camera on the moon. The strategic value of a weapon on the moon. Very lucrative. Even a remote space facility on the moon would help launch satellites.
This is another great episode of space travel the late JFK said we choose to go to the moon in 1962 Apollo 11 did it on July 20 1969 when Neil Armstrong was the first person to walk on the moon
@@across_the_plane6800 Yeah, I guess we can't have a video about the Apollo program with out the hoaxers throwing in their two cents. "You are insane". No, I think it's a lot more likely you are. Just like my nitwit stepdaughter and her husband, both of which were a couple of silly jackasses to begin with which is why it came as no surprise to find out that they bought that junk from some other nitwit they talked to on Facebook. You know what I don't understand? Why is it so hard for people to believe men went to the moon? Do they think we still live in the Stone Age? And we're not talking about Star Trek here. We're not talking about warp drive, transporters, photon torpedoes, etc. We're talking about basic, proven technology. That of liquid fuel rockets and a small capsule with life support systems for 3 men to make it to the moon and back. That's all. Is it really that hard to believe? I'd find all that other stuff harder to believe. But, that's just the way it is with those types.
While this man is breaking down the $30 billion cost of the Apollo Program in terms of hospitals, universities and endowments, he never mentioned how much it cost in terms of BOMBS, BULLETS and BATTLESHIPS. 🤔 In terms of how years in Vietnam, how much did the Apollo Program cost? 😓🤦♂️
Why do you put the unnecessary timecode right in the lower-thirds, completely covering any annotations? The speaker's name, for instance. If you absolutely MUST waste the space with a useless timecode, at least put it in a corner so that you don't cover the lower thirds.
Here's the issue: Tens of thousands of films similar to this one have been lost forever -- destroyed -- and many others are at risk. Our company preserves these precious bits of history one film at a time. How do we afford to do that? By selling them as stock footage to documentary filmmakers and broadcasters. If we did not have a counter, we could not afford to post films like these online, and no films would be preserved. It's that simple. So we ask you to bear with the watermark and timecodes. In the past we tried many different systems including placing our timer at the bottom corner of our videos. What happened? Unscrupulous UA-cam users downloaded our vids, blew them up so the timer was not visible, and re-posted them as their own content! We had to use content control to have the videos removed and shut down these channels. It's hard enough work preserving these films and posting them, without having to spend precious time dealing with policing thievery -- and not what we devoted ourselves to do. Love our channel and want to support what we do? You can help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.
Comments are soooo funny. Almost like a peanut* contest, but where people are like I know more, show me your facts and how can google the quickest. Guess it makes people feel special and sleep well when they "win" in the comments. At least, on the good side, people are actually doing some digging to find things out, including myself. Please someone argue me :)
Didn't hurt that Gagarin's flight was a fraud. He didn't land with his capsule as specified by the records keepers. He parachuted out of his capsule as the Soviets didn't trust or have the ability for a safe, soft landing! The Soviets took far greater chances with the lives of their astronauts.
@@proveit6800 It is true, those were the rules at the time put in place by the FIA, but they were changed in the 1970's after the truth about Gagarin's flight was revealed. Essentially they recognized the legitimacy of his flight despite their previous rules.
A definite hatchet job with the interviews at the start. We are led to believe that across the whole length and breadth of the United States there was nobody with a brain who was not connected to the program, who could be tracked down to give an unqualified endorsement.
While nobody is denying it's propaganda. Only fools think so because we're on a dead, stagnant, stationary, festering, rotten, immobile, moldy, limitless/limited pizza/pancake with impenetrable dome.
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 Even amateur radio and optical astronomers tracked Apollo lunar missions. Other countries tracked and confirm Apollo landing sites. Plus there's some 350 kg of lunar samples under continuous published study since 1970. Stop being a dork and grow up.
@@proveit6800 Call me, I will walk you through some of your issues tuition free. No virtue signaling no shaming but at the end of a couple of classes you will know what it is to smile laugh and have a personality
Somebody’s already there they were in allowed to land on the moon until permission was granted, if they think they’re going to land on Mars their way out of orbit. Lol 😂
It was up until Russia realized that they couldn't win, then they feigned non-interest. Hell, they even tried to land a probe on the moon at the same time as Apollo 11. It failed. What a surprise.
@@dougball328 what race? For every hour the United States had in space the Russians had 200 hours. They realize there was a ceiling and stopped taxing their civilians 60 million dollars.. I challenge you to find evidence anything has ever been higher than 300,000 ft...
@@chrisgoetz2789 that's easy. Hell even the Russians acknowledged the lunar landing as they rec'd the radio signals from moon just like everyone else. As for more than 300,000 feet, I guess the X-15, Bezos and Branson aren't good enough? You are just someone who will buy into any and all conspiracy theories. I certainly hope you haven't been vaccinated. Nature will have a chance!
@@chrisgoetz2789 If you look at your last message carefully you will see that it makes no sense. My mother taught me to never mud wrestle with a pig. You just get dirty and the pig has fun. Enjoy the mud. I'm out.
The Hebrew word means sky or arc, not the Greek Ptolemy translation firmament in the Septuagint. The sky does seperate the waters of the Earth from the waters of Heaven... Between rainfalls... Which are mentioned in Gen 2. The Hebrew narrative of creation in Ch 1 does relatively well fit our empirical understanding of cosmology...from an Earth observer's POV. You are operating on a pagan Greek interpretive corruption of the Holy Scriptures of the Masoretic text. In 500bc the Greeks believed in hard, clear celestial spheres. There is no evidence the Hebrews and later non-hellanized Judeans did.
This was such an exciting time. I knew all the Mercury astronauts names and would faithfully watch each blast off. I was 10 during the Mercury program.
I followed the space program in the 60's. I used to make and fly model rockets from Estes, balsa wood nose cones and fins, cardboard tube bodies and solid rockets. The magazine had all the rockets, even the German V-2. However, not a single model from the then USSR. It was an interesting time for sure. I was just a kid, and didn't realize how important the space program was, it was just a blast making and shooting them off. The crowning jewel in the catalog was the mighty Saturn V.
I remember all of it, exactly as you have recollected..."the mighty Saturn V"...have you ever noticed how everything space related is named after Roman gods?
I use to build and launch Estes rockets 🚀 as well. Now it’s my sons turn to learn the wonderment of flying model rocketry!!! He’s only 4, but I can’t wait to build and launch with him. “D” engines were the best because of the slow lift off. 👍🏻
The moons phases aren't caused by the earth's shadow after all
@@pedrovision6987 yup . we never went to the moon ?
I, also followed the space program, and built model rockets from Estes and still build custom rockets to launch.
The original 7 astronauts were my heroes.
The Timex commercial at the end made the whole film real for me.
Marilyn Van Derbur was a former Miss America {1958}.
The technicians who are driving 54 Chevy pickup trucks did it for me
So interesting to watch this in 2021, knowing how the story ends and the sacrifices it took to get there. RIP Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee.
Great video...a real 'time capsule' (pardon the pun LOL) of manned space flight in the 60's. The Timex ads are killer as well! LOL. I have to say, Periscope Film really does a great job providing interesting content. It stumps me how some guy with a bass and a few bad jokes can get 9 million subs yet this channel can only get 354,000 subs. This channel deserves many more.
"some guy with a bass and a few bad jokes"
Fishing in Animal Crossing has gotten someone 9 million subscribers?
People don't like to learn they want to be entertained and move onto the next entertainment. No research, no history, just what's next and what can keep my focus next
History is important, especially this type of stuff in today's day and age
Thank you for another great video, PeriscopeFilms! I am old enough to remember watching many of your historic films when they were new.
Thanks very much. Love our channel? Help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.
Very good video. I was growing up in the 60's and remember all this stuff happening.
Just wish they'd said Timex more.
And, of course, NASA chose Omega to go to the Moon!
"I see no military advantage in going to the Moon" 😂
I'm 55 years old. I grew up in the shadow of the Space Race.
It spawned a lot of technology that we take for granted today. It gave us economic and technological superiority over the rest of the World.
How is that NOT a military advantage? 🤦♂️
NASA launched Apollo 12 in 1969, it travelled over 240K miles to the moon and landed precisely less than 100m away from its target, the previously launched Surveyor probe. The Soviets immediately realized exactly how far ahead the US was in engineering and space science. 20 years later, the final straw was the proposed Star Wars missle defense program. The end of the cold war soon followed. Combined with all the other advancements in electronics and other benefits for consumers and it is clear to see why Apollo was more than worth it.
"economic and technological superiority over the rest of the World. "
Apollo did NOT give the USA such advantage. What are you talking about? The USA lost every of its military engagements since WWII.
@@RideAcrossTheRiver What are you talking about? Do you see the words 'military superiority' in the man's statement? I don't. He said technological and economic superiority. Nothing about fighting wars at all.
@@origamimambo545 Your reading skills are faulty--probably on purpose here. Read the original statement:
_"It spawned a lot of technology that we take for granted today. It gave us economic and technological superiority over the rest of the World. How is that NOT a military advantage?"_
As the man said @2.00 purely a stunt ...more about the idea of going to moon.
This was fantastic thanks.
We are going to do it again. So neat to watch all the work going into reaching out in space.
Awesome video, thank you! for posting it!
Excellent footage of the building of the physical equipment of the space program. I was just at the Johnson Space Center and visited the old Apollo control room. It is fantastic. Its ALL original equipment and they have developed a presentation that goes through the final five minutes of the Eagle landing on the moon and ALL monitor readouts and television screens and buttons are as they were as it happened. Definitely must see if youre into Apollo history.
Did they have the full "slide projection system" that was on the engineer's screens? I saw a clip or presentation about that very complex system, a marriage of television and data display. The television part was slides of the text, the data was the appropriate data being displayed/overlaid/merged onto the Mission Control green-screen displays. It may have been a Cape Kennedy or a JSC (or both) system, I don't recall.
I loved seeing the inside of Bldg. 30 during construction, especially the MOCR before the display panels were installed. Home, sweet home.
I have a difficult time understanding how the designers and engineers didn't see the hazards of filling the Apollo 1 capsule with pure oxygen. We already had many years experience with underwater diving, building and operating submarines, and confined spaces aboard ships. What the H3ll were they thinking?
Roger that! And the astronauts agreeing to go in? Yikes.
Failure of imagination. On orbit, the cabin would be at 5psi of pure oxygen, which is reasonably safe. But to simulate the pressure differential on the ground, they had to go a few psi *over* atmospheric pressure - 16 psi of oxygen - which is obviously deadly. Everyone thought the disaster would occur during launch or on orbit; a disaster during a pad test was just unimaginable.
They tried to avoid dead weight that is why they ran the risk, sadly the astronauts paid that gamble.
You need to look at more than the one (unnecessary) ground failure to decide it was a bad idea. A pure oxygen atmosphere means that they can run the cabin pressure at 20% of normal sea-level conditions. That's 3.2 PSI. If you figure out the number of square inches on the inside of that capsule, that is a heck of lot of pounds of hoop strength required, and a heck of a lot of pressure on doors to not blow out, and hoses in the air conditioning system (which was outside of the capsule where they couldn't get to it to do anything) to try to fix something.
If they had run air, all of that would have needed to be 5 times stronger. And heavier. And more likely to fail. All of those were not good outcomes.
The main problem with the ground capsule fire is that they ran pure oxygen in the capsule _at standard atmospheric pressure_, so there was 5 times as much oxygen available as there would have been in space. This was a stupidly bad decision on the part of the whoever made it, and there were engineers at the time that complained it shouldn't be done. Like the engineers at the Challenger launch that said it was out of spec, they were ignored, and it turns out luck ran out in both cases.
Where is the remaining of the film?
Very interesting film in the midst of the space race!
“Open the pod bay doors HAL”.
HAL: "show me the money"
The naysayers in this film could not fathom the many technological advances the space program brought about . Innovations for commercial use
Like WHAT? Making molds with superdry rockdust? You do know there is no commercial flight to LEO, hell aside RUSSIA not many countries visit ISS.
You mean like Tang? Yeah ok lol
well must admit Movie Studios have innovated from that programation; now to know if Reality = "looks so fake it must be real".
@@wildboar7473 : The spacesuits used on the ISS are still the one developed for Apollo.
@@wildboar7473 It cost a lot less than a shooting war between NATO & WarPac.
At 23 minute mark listen to the science guy with heavy German accent talk about beating the Russians “this time” very telling remark. Thank you for posting.
I think that's Wernher von Braun, the ex NAZI rocket scientist grabbed by the Americans at the end the the war because he knew lots of useful stuff.
@@every1665 They state in the voiceover that it's Bernhard Tessmann: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernhard_Tessmann
What is this? Why is the film cut? Where is the rest?
The micro processor aka computer chip alone made it worth it. But they had no idea where the technology would lead to
Well, for one thing, we can see videos of cats doing cute and naughty things on the internet 24/7.
@@HAL_NINER_TRIPLE_ZERO and pictures of famous womans feet
We never do. We often think we do, and it may be a place we get. But it is rarely the end of the path.
The technology did not include to make a video of a Geiger counter on the moon or inside the moon dust contaminated LEM. Hoax.
@@suekennedy8917 The Moon isn't radioactive but, yes, radiation on the lunar surface was well assessed by 1969. The Moon's surface is basalt, feldspar, and olivine. All are common minerals in the inner solar system.
All done via Analog!! Digital? What's that?? A number, finger or toe?? :-)
It's so cool that all the wil be and fuutre events are now history
The lengths they went to :P
I wonder what they would have thought about US astronauts hitching a ride on Russian space ships to get to the space station.
They would have been surprised. And doubly surprised to learn that an African immigrant built the company currently used to send astronauts and tourists to space.
@@jaredjones7632 South African! But Elon Musk is an American Citizen now!
They'd ask why NASA's budget in the 2000s is 3 percent what it was in the 1960s.
I was done deliberately to give the reds a face-lift.
By 1965 NASA had caught up with the Soviet manned space-programme and by 1967 was ahead.
Despite the terrible accident that killed 3 astronauts, among them the likable Virgil Grissom.
Oh! Where's the rest of the film?
i like these films.
but it drives me nuts that i have no udea what those fractions of seconds are supposed to be
frames of the film.... standard frame rate for film cameras was 24 frames per second, for video it's 30 frames per second. The counter they put on the film is counting 1-24 every second. Later! OL J R :)
fps, lol.
@@lukestrawwalker thanks for that, now i feel dumb, but smarter now. you learn something new every day. 59 yo and still learning.
@@victormuckleston And may you never lose the thirst for knowledge.
These days a trait like that is considered racist and based on supremacy...
So be it...
@@victormuckleston don't feel dumb unless you can't be bothered to learn anything. It's how we grow! Have a good one!
Commander Alan Shepard practically piloted his capsule back to the earth.
The time-code masks the name captions. Very irritating! Can´t you remove the time-code, please?
$$ well spent!
All that money for Universities and colleges back then would have been agreed by most was a good thing for the nation. Now near half the population thinks schooling may lead to their daughters and sons becoming enemies of traditions, family and home. Sad
15:40 wow
Who sponsored this show? 😁😁
It's amazing what mankind can do when cost is not an issue. There are many reasons to go to the moon. We are now. In a couple years. Think about a camera on the moon. The strategic value of a weapon on the moon. Very lucrative. Even a remote space facility on the moon would help launch satellites.
In Washington these days they spend thirty billion dollars renovating the congressional bathrooms.
This is another great episode of space travel the late JFK said we choose to go to the moon in 1962 Apollo 11 did it on July 20 1969 when Neil Armstrong was the first person to walk on the moon
You are insane
Right you are.....
LOL! Hoax.
@@suekennedy8917 : where?
@@across_the_plane6800 Yeah, I guess we can't have a video about the Apollo program with out the hoaxers throwing in their two cents. "You are insane". No, I think it's a lot more likely you are. Just like my nitwit stepdaughter and her husband, both of which were a couple of silly jackasses to begin with which is why it came as no surprise to find out that they bought that junk from some other nitwit they talked to on Facebook. You know what I don't understand? Why is it so hard for people to believe men went to the moon? Do they think we still live in the Stone Age? And we're not talking about Star Trek here. We're not talking about warp drive, transporters, photon torpedoes, etc. We're talking about basic, proven technology. That of liquid fuel rockets and a small capsule with life support systems for 3 men to make it to the moon and back. That's all. Is it really that hard to believe? I'd find all that other stuff harder to believe. But, that's just the way it is with those types.
See my comments below for a link to the full video.
The scientist at the beginning of this film sounds like he's had his balls cutoff.
you could have spent the money in other ways, but would you have anything to show for it ? Computer technology advanced vastly due to the program.
Better a TIMEX than a Rolex !
...ironic that Buzz Aldrin chose an Omega for the first moon landing.
@@XPLAlN NOBLESSE OBLIGE😁🎈✈🚀🌛
9:49
when was something soviet declared
NOT a success by the soviets ?
While this man is breaking down the $30 billion cost of the Apollo Program in terms of hospitals, universities and endowments, he never mentioned how much it cost in terms of BOMBS, BULLETS and BATTLESHIPS. 🤔
In terms of how years in Vietnam, how much did the Apollo Program cost? 😓🤦♂️
Why do you put the unnecessary timecode right in the lower-thirds, completely covering any annotations? The speaker's name, for instance.
If you absolutely MUST waste the space with a useless timecode, at least put it in a corner so that you don't cover the lower thirds.
Here's the issue: Tens of thousands of films similar to this one have been lost forever -- destroyed -- and many others are at risk. Our company preserves these precious bits of history one film at a time. How do we afford to do that? By selling them as stock footage to documentary filmmakers and broadcasters. If we did not have a counter, we could not afford to post films like these online, and no films would be preserved. It's that simple. So we ask you to bear with the watermark and timecodes.
In the past we tried many different systems including placing our timer at the bottom corner of our videos. What happened? Unscrupulous UA-cam users downloaded our vids, blew them up so the timer was not visible, and re-posted them as their own content! We had to use content control to have the videos removed and shut down these channels. It's hard enough work preserving these films and posting them, without having to spend precious time dealing with policing thievery -- and not what we devoted ourselves to do.
Love our channel and want to support what we do? You can help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.
CLIMAX
I want to go to 1960s Hawaii.
30 billion dollars!.... thats when 30 billion dollars was a lot of money! 🤔🤣
Hemi powered.!
Love the cheesy Timex commercial $11.95 plus tax for a women's Timex watch wow never see that again !
4:55
propaganda 1st
substance last.
Yuri got an apartment house as reward.
ten to two or one fifty or thirteen fifty
Comments are soooo funny. Almost like a peanut* contest, but where people are like I know more, show me your facts and how can google the quickest. Guess it makes people feel special and sleep well when they "win" in the comments. At least, on the good side, people are actually doing some digging to find things out, including myself. Please someone argue me :)
Here this: 25:30 to 25:45 real or fake?
Ain't no space cuz ain't no globe earth! :S
Jk I just arrived and have no clue.
@@persomelizegoo-gullcervesa6684 : You just arrived on earth?
Didn't hurt that Gagarin's flight was a fraud. He didn't land with his capsule as specified by the records keepers. He parachuted out of his capsule as the Soviets didn't trust or have the ability for a safe, soft landing!
The Soviets took far greater chances with the lives of their astronauts.
It was a soft landing. Safer too as the capsule was merely an encumbrance at that point.
How was ejecting from his capsule make Gagarin's flight a fraud?
@@proveit6800 Because the official rules for an orbital space flight called for the person to land in the capsule they'd flown in.
@@almostfm Well then, you should easily be able to provide a link to those official orbital space flight rules!
@@proveit6800 It is true, those were the rules at the time put in place by the FIA, but they were changed in the 1970's after the truth about Gagarin's flight was revealed. Essentially they recognized the legitimacy of his flight despite their previous rules.
Can anyone say where Kennedy was the day before he was killed? Checking out the rockets, of course.
And?
A definite hatchet job with the interviews at the start. We are led to believe that across the whole length and breadth of the United States there was nobody with a brain who was not connected to the program, who could be tracked down to give an unqualified endorsement.
The instruments developed would lead to cybernetic hive mind control 50 years later.
Are you still looking for your mind?
@@proveit6800 He'll never find what was never there.
Hilarious propaganda
While nobody is denying it's propaganda.
Only fools think so because we're on a dead, stagnant, stationary, festering, rotten, immobile, moldy, limitless/limited pizza/pancake with impenetrable dome.
Flattards are a different species of humanity with lesser-developed spatial perceptual acuity.
Part of american mythology.
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 Even amateur radio and optical astronomers tracked Apollo lunar missions. Other countries tracked and confirm Apollo landing sites. Plus there's some 350 kg of lunar samples under continuous published study since 1970.
Stop being a dork and grow up.
Enjoy your vaccines 🐑
Alice made it before NASA did.
No denier has made an intelligent comment, as you have just proven!
@@proveit6800 OK loosen your girdle. It must suck going through life without a sense of humor
@@damrgee8279 What a denier, believes he has a sense of humour! Now that is funny! 🤣🤣🤣
@@proveit6800 Call me, I will walk you through some of your issues tuition free. No virtue signaling no shaming but at the end of a couple of classes you will know what it is to smile laugh and have a personality
@@damrgee8279 Like i said, a denier that believes he has a sense of humour! Now that is funny! 🤣🤣🤣
That was staged, never went to the moon.
Somebody’s already there they were in allowed to land on the moon until permission was granted, if they think they’re going to land on Mars their way out of orbit. Lol 😂
@@scotthruska4906 the camara man was already there when they landed 😂😂😂 and stood there when they left😂😂😂
Tell that to the over 400,000 people who worked on the program..
@@parttime9070 why would they know any better? Use your mind.
@@parttime9070 words of truth...
Ok boomer
What does this mean?
That’s because someone else owned it…. 🤗😶🌫️😶🌫️😶🌫️👾👾👾👾🤖🤖🤖🤖☠️
What race? Can't be-lie-ve y'all fall for this nonsense
It was up until Russia realized that they couldn't win, then they feigned non-interest. Hell, they even tried to land a probe on the moon at the same time as Apollo 11. It failed. What a surprise.
@@dougball328 what race? For every hour the United States had in space the Russians had 200 hours. They realize there was a ceiling and stopped taxing their civilians 60 million dollars.. I challenge you to find evidence anything has ever been higher than 300,000 ft...
@@chrisgoetz2789 that's easy. Hell even the Russians acknowledged the lunar landing as they rec'd the radio signals from moon just like everyone else. As for more than 300,000 feet, I guess the X-15, Bezos and Branson aren't good enough? You are just someone who will buy into any and all conspiracy theories. I certainly hope you haven't been vaccinated. Nature will have a chance!
@@dougball328 😃 Yep, seen it on television so it's real lol sure thing. 10(-11) Torr = 131 million atmospheres....
@@chrisgoetz2789 If you look at your last message carefully you will see that it makes no sense. My mother taught me to never mud wrestle with a pig. You just get dirty and the pig has fun. Enjoy the mud. I'm out.
Apparently most of you are completely blind to Genesis 1:6-9
Old Middle Eastern folk tales don't relate to exploration of space.
Using the Bible to explain science is like calling a plumber to get an explanation on brain surgery, as in not a very good idea.
The Hebrew word means sky or arc, not the Greek Ptolemy translation firmament in the Septuagint. The sky does seperate the waters of the Earth from the waters of Heaven... Between rainfalls... Which are mentioned in Gen 2. The Hebrew narrative of creation in Ch 1 does relatively well fit our empirical understanding of cosmology...from an Earth observer's POV.
You are operating on a pagan Greek interpretive corruption of the Holy Scriptures of the Masoretic text.
In 500bc the Greeks believed in hard, clear celestial spheres. There is no evidence the Hebrews and later non-hellanized Judeans did.
@@STho205 If the firmament has firm, then hamsters have ham