This *Huge ENGINE* Will Change The Aviation Industry FOREVER!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 чер 2024
  • What is the World’s largest jet Engine? If you said the General Electric GE9X then you'd be wrong, but it’s close. The world’s largest jet engine is actually the supersized Rolls-Royce Ultra-fan.
    Although the engine may still be in its demonstrator phase, Rolls-Royce has already tested it at maximum power. And looking at what this massive engine could offer to aircrafts, it’s safe to say that we might well be looking at the future of aviation.
    So just how big is the Ultra fan engine? How does it operate? How does it compare to other large and powerful engines? And finally, what are its prospects in the aviation industry?
    Business : 4fancyedit@gmail.com
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 246

  • @JamesWest12
    @JamesWest12  3 місяці тому +95

    It's Aircraft not aircrafts. whoever made this video sucks !!

    • @alanwhiplington5504
      @alanwhiplington5504 3 місяці тому +2

      Have just done the same.

    • @alphaomega153
      @alphaomega153 3 місяці тому +10

      They also pronounced “triple” TRY-PULL.

    • @willjeffery2661
      @willjeffery2661 3 місяці тому +2

      Here here.

    • @mcdrogo
      @mcdrogo 3 місяці тому +1

      Anally retentive 😂

    • @caribbb
      @caribbb 3 місяці тому +11

      It’s a computer generated voice IMO

  • @eddiebarford6988
    @eddiebarford6988 3 місяці тому +16

    Very informative for the layman, being British I am very proud of RollsRoyce.

  • @ZX-mg5xs
    @ZX-mg5xs 3 місяці тому +30

    RR, the epitome of UK engineering.

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      Yup. The rest of the western world is ahead.

    • @ImpendingJoker
      @ImpendingJoker 3 місяці тому +1

      Playing catch up to the US as always. XD

    • @Jack-bs6zb
      @Jack-bs6zb 3 місяці тому

      @@ImpendingJoker... boo hoo. Cry yourself to sleep.

    • @artrandy
      @artrandy 3 місяці тому +11

      @@ImpendingJoker
      Yes, just like they did when the RR Merlin was built under licence for Mustangs to protect those brave US bomber boys over Germany in WW2. GE's first turbo jet engine was British and built under licence BTW. Every day is a history day...😀😀...

    • @ant2312
      @ant2312 2 місяці тому +1

      lol you got owned@@ImpendingJoker

  • @ianmartinkay
    @ianmartinkay 3 місяці тому +103

    Every time I hear “aircrafts” I switch off. Aircraft is the plural of aircraft.

    • @justinmcdaid2594
      @justinmcdaid2594 3 місяці тому +8

      You are clearly upset easily then ❄️❄️

    • @5GNV
      @5GNV 3 місяці тому +10

      @@justinmcdaid2594 saying "Aircrafts" is ignorant... especially when this is not only the topic of the Video - but of the whole CHANNEL.

    • @ML-vy8xo
      @ML-vy8xo 3 місяці тому +7

      Yep, it triggers me too, smacks of illiteracy

    • @stefanweilhartner4415
      @stefanweilhartner4415 3 місяці тому +6

      yes, and they cost even more moneys

    • @nogonperson7357
      @nogonperson7357 3 місяці тому +3

      damn u now i cannot unhear it

  • @trainman9119
    @trainman9119 3 місяці тому +52

    Lousy computer speech reading. When do you pronounce the word “triple” as “try-ple”.

    • @David-yy7lb
      @David-yy7lb 3 місяці тому +3

      😂👍🏿...I heard it too🤦🏿‍♂️

    • @suspicionofdeceit
      @suspicionofdeceit 3 місяці тому +3

      Gotta admit it’s pretty darn good overall. It’s come a long way.

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      @@suspicionofdeceit
      No, it's not.

    • @josh8344
      @josh8344 2 місяці тому

      It’s an AI vid. To be expected

    • @OBGynKenobi
      @OBGynKenobi 2 місяці тому

      Also, the way it pronounces PRAATT and whitney. Still, it's pretty good, sounds very natural otherwise.

  • @gusm5128
    @gusm5128 3 місяці тому +3

    Tufan , that RR ceo has an appropriate name .

  • @richardbriansmith8562
    @richardbriansmith8562 3 місяці тому +3

    Awesome Video 😊

  • @user-qk9ce8kf2y
    @user-qk9ce8kf2y 3 місяці тому

    Thanks for your insight and knowledge

  • @ashfaq1999
    @ashfaq1999 3 місяці тому +3

    Great Video.

  • @pwrofmusic
    @pwrofmusic 3 місяці тому +58

    Lol the narrator is an AI bot 😂😂 "Pratt... Pause Whitney" 😂😂😂 this channel is a hoax

    • @user-oo6lm1un6m
      @user-oo6lm1un6m 3 місяці тому +2

      PRATT……..

    • @user-oo6lm1un6m
      @user-oo6lm1un6m 3 місяці тому +2

      WHITNEY

    • @efgerfgergferg6749
      @efgerfgergferg6749 3 місяці тому +10

      Too many of such channels popping up these days

    • @user-oo6lm1un6m
      @user-oo6lm1un6m 3 місяці тому +2

      HOUSTON… We have a problem

    • @mcpr5971
      @mcpr5971 3 місяці тому

      I really fear that this is just the beginning. What if 5+ years from now this is the new normal? AI voices are _nearly_ indistinguishable from human now, all thats needed to catch up is AI faces (aka Max Headroom). Once those are believable, we'll have new "hosts" that don't even exist, just testing new AI algorithms to grab our attention and maximize engagement. An unknown number of YT comments are fake thanks to LLM. Fake Plastic Trees man...smh.

  • @technogiggle
    @technogiggle 3 місяці тому +9

    "Aircrafts" is among many factual errors. Stock footage and a desktop editor are no replacements for expertise. SMH

  • @AMERICANPATRIOT1945
    @AMERICANPATRIOT1945 3 місяці тому +2

    This engine is clearly the Rolls Royce of turbofan engines. Pun intended!

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      You mean it's based on an old BMW 7 series?

  • @john6903
    @john6903 3 місяці тому

    Bring it on .... Baby!

  • @martinhann1672
    @martinhann1672 3 місяці тому +3

    Correct me if I’m wrong but you stated that the combustion temperatures were reduced by running a leaner combustion ratio - not in my book. This apparently reduces Nox emissions but I thought it went in the opposite direction. Normally, increases of combustion temperature makes engines more efficient but increases the Nox.

    • @hmhama782
      @hmhama782 3 місяці тому +3

      Efficiency is limited by the max allowable inlet temperature of the turbine. The flame temperature is significantly higher and lowering this does not necessarily bring down the efficiency but reduces NOx emissions effectively.
      The combustor cans and blades are protected with cooling air shields resulting in lowering the hot gas temperature after the combustion at the turbine inlet.

  • @stevewhalen6973
    @stevewhalen6973 2 місяці тому +1

    Surprisingly, quiet are these large turbo duct fan engines.
    An early day turbo fan of this much power if it had ever been built would have broken your ear drums upon take off along the runway

  • @lawrencepll76
    @lawrencepll76 3 місяці тому +3

    A350Neo would be nice!

  • @roncarney9158
    @roncarney9158 2 місяці тому +1

    "Used cooking oil" This Net Zero insanity is becoming more dystopic, if that`s possible!

  • @grahamcook9289
    @grahamcook9289 2 місяці тому

    Maaate, it's an aircraft and many aircraft. Aircrafts is not a word. Doh!

  • @turtlehead-uk7jw
    @turtlehead-uk7jw 3 місяці тому +1

    The ge9x has already been tested. So I don’t know where the part on the “ge9x not being tested” came from.

  • @GarlandTexasSpotter2024
    @GarlandTexasSpotter2024 3 місяці тому

    Literally a friend of Aviation Future

  • @phbrinsden
    @phbrinsden 3 місяці тому +4

    So, a turbojet core driving large fan blades. Seems to be approaching the original turboprop engine concept.

  • @David-yy7lb
    @David-yy7lb 3 місяці тому +4

    It won't be long until someone makes an engine that makes 150,000 LBS of thrust

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      It will. There's no need for it. The market has moved away from the hub and spoke model, thus super jumbo's are a thing of the past. Fuel savings goes way ahead of extreme power. The Ultrafan is an example of exactly this.

    • @johnchristmas7522
      @johnchristmas7522 3 місяці тому +1

      You need a Aircraft manufacturer to build a aircraft to use that power and multiple airlines to buy it. Thats the problem for engine manufacturers, the have to be clairvoyant!

    • @charlesjay8818
      @charlesjay8818 2 місяці тому

      I can't see any future aircraft, needing 150k LBS thrust per engine. Unless the A380 was re-configured to a twin engine aircraft where two 150k LBS thrust "might" be needed....... but thats never gonna happen.

    • @allen480
      @allen480 2 місяці тому

      I won’t fly on an airplane that doesn’t have that JP-4 kerosine smell.

  • @BuzzLightyear66
    @BuzzLightyear66 2 місяці тому

    It's very reasuring to know that so many aircraft engine manufacturers are competing to produce eco-friendly engines. With global warming increasing constantly, this revolution will be vital for human survival in years to come.

  • @jimw1615
    @jimw1615 3 місяці тому

    A target introduction into the market in 2030!!! That's just in time for the huge backlog of airliner orders to be pushed out and over with.

  • @_Alfa.Bravo_
    @_Alfa.Bravo_ 3 місяці тому +4

    CFM and GE have the most efficient turbine prop

  • @mikedunbar4044
    @mikedunbar4044 2 місяці тому

    RR. Buy four, keep two in the air.

  • @Amplar2
    @Amplar2 3 місяці тому

    literally just gone back to turboprops. Turbojets have RPM limitations since once blade tips start hitting supersonic, bad things happen. So, we're left with just making the prop bigger and bigger

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому +1

      Let's get a few things straight. These are turbofans, not turbojets. A turbojet is a jet engine with no bypass.
      Secondly, many turbofan engines have fans where the tip speed goes far above the speed of sound. Take the GE90 115B for example. At full take-off thrust for heavy loads, the blade tips hit about Mach 1.66 depending on climate conditions.
      The idea that turbofans have the same kind of issues with going supersonic as a turboprop, is way, way wrong.
      The industry is interested in slow moving fans with a lot of pitch because it moves more air slower, thus creating less noise. As for the PW RISE engine, we'll see.

  • @mosulman7773
    @mosulman7773 2 місяці тому

    I just visited the US Air Force Museum in Ohio. The jet engines on large transport aircraft during 1970 to 2020 seem tiny by comparison to today’s new engines. My question is: How much heavier are the high bypass engines?

  • @yggdrasil9039
    @yggdrasil9039 3 місяці тому +1

    The next step is to include an Induction Motor in the rotor fan system that can power the fan silently with electric only, along with the development of a start-stop system in the bypass engine that can fire up instantly. That would create a kind of hybrid Prius version of a jet engine and reduce fuel use further, as well as resulting in silent landings.

    • @johnburns4017
      @johnburns4017 3 місяці тому +1

      Yes, make it adaptable to be a hybrid. Battery technology is improving greatly. Safe solid state is going along nicely. By the time an electric motor is incorporated into the unit battery technology will have advanced.

    • @ACELog
      @ACELog 3 місяці тому +1

      @@johnburns4017 You guys have each got yourselves a job! Turn up on RRA Derby doorstep first thing Monday morning!
      Seriously, it's a bit of nostalgia for me when I watch this, being a retired engineer who worked for a sub-contractor to RRA, but on the UK nuclear sub fleet.

    • @chrissmith2114
      @chrissmith2114 2 місяці тому

      Batteries are way too heavy for putting in aircraft, their energy density compared to fossil fuels sucks.....

    • @johnburns4017
      @johnburns4017 2 місяці тому

      @@chrissmith2114
      At the moment batteries are heavy. They are advancing at a phenomenal rate. Even right now they are suitable for landing an aircraft over built up areas. There are few battery planes around.

    • @chrissmith2114
      @chrissmith2114 2 місяці тому

      @@johnburns4017 If you want a plane that can carry a battery and little else, build a battery plane.. If you want a plane that can carry passengers and freight - build a plane powered by kerosene...

  • @adogonasidecar1262
    @adogonasidecar1262 2 місяці тому

    This really feels like advertising... not a critical engineering discussion

  • @PiDsPagePrototypes
    @PiDsPagePrototypes 2 місяці тому

    When they rebuild the An-225, six of these would be a good idea.
    Hrrrm,.. Lean running engines generally run hotter, not colder.
    Covid didn't affect Roll's big engine, the bearing failures leading to A380's having holes through the wings when the fans around the bearings let go, that affected the bottom line.

  • @stefanweilhartner4415
    @stefanweilhartner4415 3 місяці тому +6

    i want to see it on an a380

    • @unggrabb
      @unggrabb 3 місяці тому +1

      4 of them. And 6 on the AN 224

    • @StinkyAviation
      @StinkyAviation 3 місяці тому

      you never know when this can hold enough power for 6 engines when there are 4 of them🫠

    • @unggrabb
      @unggrabb 3 місяці тому

      @@StinkyAviation Sensation, "A380 went supersonic, created a sonic boom which flattened half of New York" :-)

    • @stefanweilhartner4415
      @stefanweilhartner4415 3 місяці тому

      @@StinkyAviation you don't need 6 engines

    • @StinkyAviation
      @StinkyAviation 3 місяці тому

      @@stefanweilhartner4415 yea thats what im trying to say (:

  • @marklandwehr7604
    @marklandwehr7604 3 місяці тому

    Clean fuel can be made from the fisher tropic process Using Cole

    • @markkinsler4333
      @markkinsler4333 3 місяці тому

      Oh dear. Clean coal has been a fraught subject here in Appalachian coal country. I'd thought they'd given up.

  • @marciamenage931
    @marciamenage931 3 місяці тому

    More dire tripe, where are the antigravitic engines being used on the TR3bs??????

  • @larrydugan1441
    @larrydugan1441 2 місяці тому

    What aircraft will this engine go on?

  • @fjmj1980
    @fjmj1980 3 місяці тому

    Airbus is leaning toward GE Snecma unducted fan for the narrow body replacement. It’s very telling if Boeing swings toward a superfan for the competition. It will be an all in bet and Boeing has not been making great decisions for a while.

  • @ImpendingJoker
    @ImpendingJoker 3 місяці тому

    So, the GE9X is the world's largest production engine.

  • @roops2939
    @roops2939 3 місяці тому

    6" size difference gives rise to an increase in thrust...and an increase in performance.

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому

      Not when the fan is geared it does not. Geared fans achieve efficiency by having larger fans running slower and lose out on thrust.

  • @6B8RX
    @6B8RX 3 місяці тому +3

    It's "aircraft", not "aircrafts". 'Aircraft' is both singular and plural.

    • @markkinsler4333
      @markkinsler4333 3 місяці тому

      I think that may be a Britishism.

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      @@markkinsler4333
      Nah. It's AI.

  • @Colorado_Native
    @Colorado_Native 3 місяці тому

    So, let me get this correct. We move the seats even closer together, charge more, and then put bigger engines on it to handle the weight of the extra passengers. OK, I thought that's what you said. Next, remove all the seats and have shoulder harnesses holding everybody in.

    • @mosulman7773
      @mosulman7773 2 місяці тому

      Have you seen that Finnair has begun weighing passengers? You think boarding is bad now, wait until large families have to weigh each child. Does a passenger weighing 200 pounds count as two passengers.

    • @charlesjay8818
      @charlesjay8818 2 місяці тому

      @@mosulman7773 it's voluntary

    • @Colorado_Native
      @Colorado_Native 2 місяці тому

      @@mosulman7773 Weighing passengers is nothing new. Way back they used to weigh the passengers and their luggage all the time. Some plus-sized passengers insist on getting two seats for the price of one. Does a skinny passenger pay less for using only half a seat? People in general are getting heftier and this affects the aircraft's weight and balance. Think of it as a safety feature. FWIW, I am retired USAF and did flight training so I know a little about this. They also know how much fuel is on board by its weight, not by quantity. Hope this helps.

  • @mikecar52
    @mikecar52 2 місяці тому

    0:53 aircraft not aircrafts an aeroplane is aircraft, lots of aeroplanes is still aircraft. Aircrafts, that word does not exist.

  • @dm55
    @dm55 3 місяці тому

    Even the tile tells you it's BS. We all agree.

  • @jimcarpenter965
    @jimcarpenter965 3 місяці тому

    The plural of aircraft is aircraft, not “aircrafts”.

  • @thomasm1964
    @thomasm1964 3 місяці тому

    "Aircraft", like "sheep", forms its own plural.

  • @andrekruger135
    @andrekruger135 2 місяці тому

    "Inches", "Feet"? In the 21st century?

    • @charlesjay8818
      @charlesjay8818 2 місяці тому

      Typical Americans, they like to be confusing and different from the rest of the world. Just like the sports they play. American football, Baseball, Basketball........ 3 sports NOBODY else in the world plays hahahaha

  • @ronaryel6445
    @ronaryel6445 3 місяці тому

    The most powerful engine today is the General Electric GE-90. It generated and sustained 125,000 lb of thrust on a test stand; as deployed on a 777-200 or -300, it generates 110,000 lb of thrust. Unless the Ultrafan is rated to produce more than 110,000 lb of thrust, it is NOT the most powerful (although the fan diameter might be larger). The Ultrafan is Rolls Royce's version of a Geared Turbofan. This engine is very late in coming, which is why it was not available to the Airbus A340 when that airplace came out. Instead, the A340-300 was left underpowered, using CFM-56 engines instead.

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому +1

      The 777-200 does not run the 115B.

    • @ronaryel6445
      @ronaryel6445 3 місяці тому

      @@AB-80X So only the -300?

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому +1

      @@ronaryel6445
      Yep

    • @artrandy
      @artrandy 3 місяці тому

      Thumbnail says "huge engine", not biggest. And the very idea that the UltraFan should have been developed in 1987 along with the A340, is ridiculous. Its not late in coming, it more advanced than what its competitors can claim for R&D. Ever since the success of the A350 with its RR engines, there's a campaign led by some against RR, based on 'hard cheese'. Get over it bud, just because American airlines except Delta are investing in GE for w/ bodies, doesn't mean the rest of the world needs to. The A350 will continue with exclusively RR engines until at least 2030, and then hopefully extended. GE might like to buy their way on to the programme then, assuming the B777X is not certificated by that date still😀, but Airbus will probably be producing a NEO option then anyway........

    • @ronaryel6445
      @ronaryel6445 2 місяці тому

      @@artrandy Read my comment more carefully. Rolls Royce is late on the Ultrafan in relation to Pratt and Whitney's GTF. It wasn't the Ultrafan back in 1987; it was an earlier version of GTF technology, and that engine fell badly behind schedule and ultimately failed. And Airbus was expecting it for the A340. The Ultrafan is Rolls Royce second attempt at making a GTF.

  • @WilliamPotts3
    @WilliamPotts3 3 місяці тому

    If it hasn’t flown yet on a jet then it’s not the largest.

  • @markbass9402
    @markbass9402 3 місяці тому

    The speech of this video is from a machine. Talk to yourself.

  • @rbleslie1971
    @rbleslie1971 3 місяці тому +2

    Talks about RR all the while showing GE or CFM engines.

    • @bar10ml44
      @bar10ml44 3 місяці тому

      The RR engine is only in testing. Probably no pictures available of the actual engine.

    • @exavyco8686
      @exavyco8686 3 місяці тому

      and this affects your life exactly how? because as far as we can see, this is free content for you. stop being a whiny little bitch.

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому

      ​@@bar10ml44There are PLENTY of pics of this 140" engine including in the video

    • @charlesjay8818
      @charlesjay8818 2 місяці тому

      OKAY..... so the narration didn't quite match up with the video exactly..... BIG deal, get over it!

  • @orlandonelthorpe9027
    @orlandonelthorpe9027 2 місяці тому

    Is this a robot voice? Why does he/it say 'aircraftS'? and "emissions would more than trYple".

  • @coonsta
    @coonsta 3 місяці тому

    Maybe the engine would bring standard jets MACH 1.0.

    • @markkinsler4333
      @markkinsler4333 3 місяці тому

      Present engines could do it with some modification. It's the airframe that needs to be altered and reinforced. But we earthlings would have to deal with the sonic boom.

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      If you take an A320, 737 or 787 etc. to Mach 1, the plane will tear itself apart.
      Just ask Lauda Air.

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      @@markkinsler4333 Reinforcement? Not even remotely enough.

  • @richardburfoot461
    @richardburfoot461 3 місяці тому

    Had to give up - spoilt by intrusive background noise. Great shame.

  • @frankyates7910
    @frankyates7910 3 місяці тому

    time will tell the result.

  • @actorenEU
    @actorenEU 3 місяці тому

    Terrible music noise.

  • @andrewnelson3681
    @andrewnelson3681 3 місяці тому

    All part of the plan to make air travel unaffordable for ordinary people.

    • @exavyco8686
      @exavyco8686 3 місяці тому

      stupid comment from a stupid ordinary person.

    • @charlesjay8818
      @charlesjay8818 2 місяці тому

      quite the opposite if you look at the aviation industry over the last 40-50 years. Flying has never been cheaper. You can book a one way flight with Ryanair, Wizzair, Easyjet etc from £15...... basically the price of a UK packet of cigarette. I doubt that was the case 30/40/50 years ago. Ordinary people have never had it so good, choice and price of food from all over the world, choice and range of cars, aviation, booking an Hotel, Airbnb, hostel online cheap AF, cost of high speed internet, cost of satellite (starlink), cost of clothes, cost & availability of everything has got better due to technology, economies of scale and globalisation, the "ordinary" people are doing just fine today compared to the 1940s 50s 60s 70s lol

  • @yardman0001
    @yardman0001 3 місяці тому +1

    Straight garbgage channel

  • @petercrossley1069
    @petercrossley1069 3 місяці тому

    Triple is not pronounced like “trifle’. Who hired this bloke?

  • @SimpleLivings
    @SimpleLivings 2 місяці тому

    Buy Rycey

  • @AB-80X
    @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

    Okay. So a larger PW 1000G.

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому

      With a gear box far superior to the PW 1000G

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      @@nathd1748
      That's an assumption, not a fact.

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому

      @AB-80X It's no assumption. The RR gearbox was tested handling the output equivalent to 400 Formula 1 cars continuously through the gears for what would be the equivalent of a D-check. It was fine. Not ONE P&W GTF has achieved that. RR were not rushing any gearbox to market after the Trent 1000 debacle.

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      @@nathd1748
      The fact that you use that kind of silly comparison, tells me a lot.
      Who is serious and uses such a comparison. What torque, at what RPM, at what temps, for how long etc.
      What you are completely missing is the fact that nothing is proven until it sees an actual work environment. There has been a lot of engines and components tested for various things over the years, which during tests looked remarkable. Then when put into service, they did not work.
      When someone tells you something along the lines of "The torque of 400 F1 cars", they are doing nothing more than trying to present impressive comparisons to lay people. The P&W GTF is in service, and a much smaller engine. The Ultrafan is not, and obviously a bigger engine has a bigger gearbox. Not a big surprise I'm sure we can agree.

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому

      @AB-80X Since you don't know, the Ultrafan gearbox is designed to be scaled down to 25,000lb just bu reducing fan and compressor blade architecture.

  • @alanwilliams9310
    @alanwilliams9310 3 місяці тому +2

    Very difficult to watch with such awful photography flashing from one view to another so quickly!

  • @jonwagner1
    @jonwagner1 3 місяці тому +5

    Why is there competition between the voice and stupid music tracks?

    • @alanbrown9178
      @alanbrown9178 3 місяці тому

      and the equally daft "woosh" noise when changing scenes....

  • @conantdog
    @conantdog 3 місяці тому

    Na

  • @robertansley5526
    @robertansley5526 3 місяці тому +1

    Yet carbon dioxide is only 0.04% in the atmosphere and mankind's contribution combined is only 3$. So, if carbon dioxide drops below 0.02%, everything dies. While making things more environmentally friendly is what we should strive for, the "global warming" due to carbon emissions sounds far fetched and just may be a way for billionaires to make more billions from government subsidies. Otherwise, all scientists would agree that mankind is responsible but there is not 100% consensus.

    • @CaptainCookie04
      @CaptainCookie04 3 місяці тому

      No it’s really not, if you understand thermodynamics you will know that heat retention du to CO2 is a real thing. And tbh all real scientists do agree that global warming is a thing

  • @eddylee3826
    @eddylee3826 3 місяці тому

    Sane engine thst crashed with the boeing 737 max

  • @alexandermenzies9954
    @alexandermenzies9954 3 місяці тому +1

    The semi-literate "aircrafts (sic)" man or program needs booting out of the narration job.
    Likewise the script writer needs another job where he/she will learn that AGW has nothing to do with CO2. The scam has very little time left.

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 3 місяці тому

    The current largest PRODUCTION jet engine is the GE9x.
    The Ultrafan isn't in production yet.
    That PROBABLY will change in 5-10 years - if it finds an aircraft to mount it on.

  • @davewebster1627
    @davewebster1627 3 місяці тому

    RR almost went bust years ago over a new engine development and the government had to bail them out, they need to be careful this does no happen again

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому +2

      No chance of happening. The new design is already developed and paid for

  • @haroldowen6001
    @haroldowen6001 2 місяці тому

    We want used cooking oils gumming up multi- million pound engines……NOT!
    I refuse to die for environmental issues.

  • @edau69
    @edau69 3 місяці тому

    Is this an ad for Rolls Royce, hate to tell you Pratt already has a Geared Turbo Fan and GE already has a Composite Fan Blades.

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому

      Hate to tell you that RR was originally a 50% shareholder in the PW Geared Turbofan programme but decided the gearbox was a pile of shite and withdrew. How correct they were??!! 400 aircraft grounded with P&W lump of shit GTF.

  • @castlegate2015
    @castlegate2015 3 місяці тому

    That was more irritating than informative.

  • @bobdrummond6540
    @bobdrummond6540 3 місяці тому

    @AeroAdventures: Yeah... FOREVER... right. BTW, I didn't actually watch the video, stopped it as soon as the page loaded. Hope you don't get credit for it. What a dumb, ridiculous title. Why?

    • @charlesjay8818
      @charlesjay8818 2 місяці тому

      You STOPPED the video as soon as the page loaded & didn't watch it........... but had enough time to write this comment???? hahahaha
      Who is dumb and ridiculous now

  • @GreenCurryiykyk
    @GreenCurryiykyk 2 місяці тому +1

    You lost me at "tripe-all". Come back when you can listen through your text to speech and edit errors.

  • @marcusdamberger
    @marcusdamberger 3 місяці тому

    AI robot voice.. Why not narrate it yourself, the mispronunciations are always obvious.. cant finish listing to this video, makes we wonder if the script was also AI generated.

  • @thehonestdoctor3590
    @thehonestdoctor3590 3 місяці тому

    CLiMaTe CHanGe 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

  • @EduardQualls
    @EduardQualls 3 місяці тому

    *As with **_all_** vehicles, the plural of "aircraft" is "aircraft." **_Only_** if you're talking about weaving, pottery-making, macramé, knitting, scrap-booking and such is the plural, "crafts," used.*
    And what the hell is "try-pl'd?" Can someone's AI narrator not read the word "tripled"? You am not learn writem-speakem Inglich?

  • @josh8344
    @josh8344 2 місяці тому

    Such an AI vid..smh.

  • @antibureaucrat
    @antibureaucrat 3 місяці тому

    bad AI narration

  • @chrissmith2114
    @chrissmith2114 2 місяці тому

    'Sustainable fuel' = chopping down rainforest to grow crops that instead of being fed to humans, get fed to aircraft engines = madness.....

  • @cwp0
    @cwp0 3 місяці тому +1

    An engine looking for a plane ! RR needs a single isle engine bad management

  • @cstattin
    @cstattin 2 місяці тому

    Inces???

  • @jishin75
    @jishin75 3 місяці тому

    So many crap in a video... 😂😂😂

  • @EngelsAviation
    @EngelsAviation 3 місяці тому +1

    thing is new engines R unreliable .. unacceptable…

    • @jase6370
      @jase6370 2 місяці тому

      Rubbish statement, all manufacturers have had recent durability issues. The only issue with R-R is the 97k in a hot environment where emirates want a longer service time

    • @charlesjay8818
      @charlesjay8818 2 місяці тому

      @@jase6370 I agree. Well pointed out..... to the person who goes by EngelsAviation hahahahaha People are either stupid, lazy to google the info, or just keyboard trolls.

  • @gunsaway1
    @gunsaway1 3 місяці тому

    Geared engine will be its downfall. GE is still the best powerplant

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому +1

      What when the gearbox has been tested for 6 years continuously? And the UF is knocking out 110k thrust at double digit fiel savings over the GE9x?

  • @olamarvin
    @olamarvin 3 місяці тому

    Not a huge fan of this.

  • @pachigalia839
    @pachigalia839 3 місяці тому

    This sounds a lot like an Republican American, in complete denial of climate change!
    Fuel efficiency is all about revenue for the shareholdets, and renewable oíl does not help in any way because, unlike food and water, the oíl reserves are not a problem.

  • @mariorivera6292
    @mariorivera6292 2 місяці тому

    Did you just say “aircrafts”?? 😂😂
    Holy shit, dude you ought to be ashamed of yourself.

  • @geoeneas
    @geoeneas 3 місяці тому +1

    There is no plane in the pipeline for this engine.

    • @edwardwilcox6606
      @edwardwilcox6606 3 місяці тому +1

      Because UltraFan can be applied to RR`s range of engines it`s thought that A350, B787 could benefit in the future. The demostrator engine is at the very top-end of size & power, there`s speculation that if RR decide to design a narrow-body engine then UltraFan could be incorporated. My opinion is they`ll put the first one on the A350-1000, this will increase it`s range & may lead to a stretched version. It would be sensible to offer something for the Dreamliner too as both these aircraft will be around for many years.

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому

      Oh there IS. RR have a scaled variant under build to offer Airbus a 3rd option for the A320 series. Plenty of sales in the programme to grab a slice.

    • @geoeneas
      @geoeneas 3 місяці тому

      @nathd1748 yes the new tech but not the engine they are building and testing now.

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому

      @@geoeneas they are almost finished building a scaled version of this UF. You'll hear about it in about 2 months.

    • @Void_666
      @Void_666 3 місяці тому

      ​@@nathd1748 I'm wondering (no sarcasm) how this scaling down will turn out. The high bypass ratio of the demonstrator is due to huge fan and very compact core. Can they compact the core even more to get the same bypass ratio with smaller (way smaller) fan that may be feasible for a narrowbody aircraft?

  • @TIMMEH19991
    @TIMMEH19991 3 місяці тому

    AI commentary, gives you a thumbs down and not a subscription.

  • @kingjohn1974
    @kingjohn1974 3 місяці тому

    Will there be any oxygen left in the atmosphere after all this?Is clean air still available for my grandchildren? Why do people feel it's necessary to travel just because they can?Does anybody care?

  • @VANITY80
    @VANITY80 2 місяці тому

    Praaat…and Whitney. Dude, stop being lazy and narrate your content.

  • @baadnewz017
    @baadnewz017 3 місяці тому

    GE > RR

  • @crfwjl3833
    @crfwjl3833 3 місяці тому

    Stupid Engine~

    • @nathd1748
      @nathd1748 3 місяці тому

      Whats stupid about it?

  • @user-fx3yf3vu8n
    @user-fx3yf3vu8n 3 місяці тому +6

    This is rubbish; just AI generated waffle that tells you nothing

    • @AB-80X
      @AB-80X 3 місяці тому

      Yep. The new UA-cam.

  • @zigbeegooblesnort125
    @zigbeegooblesnort125 3 місяці тому

    The "Greenies" are like a watermelon 🍉, they are green on the outside but red on the inside 🇨🇳❗️

  • @dickb2128
    @dickb2128 2 місяці тому

    You need to stop saying aircrafts since the plural of aircraft is aircraft. One aircraft, fifteen aircraft. Got it? Or are you yet another You Tube AI make believe person? Awful