Deconstructing the Concept of Nuclear Deterrence | Jamie Withorne | TEDxMiddlebury

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 тра 2024
  • Jamie Withorne discusses the implications of arms control and nuclear deterrence in practice. She then dives into the linguistic connotations of the lexicon used when discussing deterrence and its connections to masculinity. Jamie Withorne is a Research Assistant for the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, an affiliate of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies. With this position, Jamie conducts extensive research on emerging functions and applications of new technologies
    and communicates her findings to policy-oriented audiences. She also analyzes data to better
    understand North Korean sanctions evasion tactics and trends. Her research interests include
    missile technology and transatlantic affairs, with an emphasis on Nordic countries.
    Jamie is an advisor for Girl Security, wherein she works towards making national security issues
    more accessible to young women by providing training, education, and support. She is also a
    contributing author for Inkstick Media, a publication dedicated to “de-jargoning” national
    security issues. Independently, Jamie has developed and manages learnwmd.com, a website
    dedicated to creating a learning commons for WMD education. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @johnroanoke9080
    @johnroanoke9080 4 роки тому +2

    Cool talk

  • @elchefe7701
    @elchefe7701 4 роки тому +5

    Breath!

  • @ericolson3900
    @ericolson3900 4 роки тому +2

    Xanax

  • @ghostwriter9730
    @ghostwriter9730 4 роки тому

    Nuclear Deterrence is both a Powerfull Action and an Indirect Action.
    Deterrence is more in the Indirect Action than in the Powerful Action. A Pacific Action can also be Deterrent if it can also stay Indirect, this is why for example the Climate Change debate is Deterrent without power.

  • @severinp.7050
    @severinp.7050 3 роки тому +6

    I was expecting a really thorough explanation of nuclear deterrence, however she does not seem to grasp the concept

    • @aaronwright7122
      @aaronwright7122 3 роки тому +3

      How do you know that she couldn't grasp the concept if you were looking for a thorough explanation lol

    • @severinp.7050
      @severinp.7050 3 роки тому +3

      @@aaronwright7122 it is called looking for teaching material mate ;-)

  • @nacernait1374
    @nacernait1374 4 роки тому +5

    way too many "kind of"s

    • @corgipaws9429
      @corgipaws9429 4 роки тому +1

      nacer nait you don’t even go here...

  • @edwincardona7835
    @edwincardona7835 3 роки тому +3

    Nothing about Nuclear Deterrence.

  • @mr.constitution
    @mr.constitution 2 місяці тому +1

    These "Ted Talks" are so pretentious.