She's a judge. That would make her a lawyer. She had an evasive non-answer and she stuck with it, exactly like *her* lawyer told her to. If she had deviated from that answer by even a tiny bit, she would have been stuck with having to either tell the truth, or risk impeachment.
Well, if she sticks to the wording her defense attorneys dictated to her, they at least can't prosecute her for lying under oath. Of course, that pretty much defines her qualifications for the job.
So where did he get that comment if not from someone at this meeting? By the way is lying under oath to Congress is a felony? Right? Can these "judges" be removed later if they are if they found to have lied under oath?
1. She didn't lie. She just used a bunch of legalese to avoid answering the question. 2. It is very hard to impeach a judge. That's why bright men like Senator Kennedy are so valuable to the vetting process for (pejorative deleted) judges like her.
Right, because only dems lie!!! .... Oh wait... Is that the same senator that stated over 15 times "we have one of our most trusted informant providing us with proof that biden was paid 5 million dollars from barisma" Until after a 2+ year investigation the "trusted informant" ADMITTED to have no proof AND ADMITTED to have been given that "info" from a RUSSIAN AGENT. The same russian agent currently sitting in prison at this very moment.. Listen and repeat MAGAots! Make sure to stay ignorant and NEVER check ANYTHING for yourselves. Enjoy your life of hourly pay and cheaper groceries that your cult leader will provide! Lolol Tip: Google who pays TARIFFS Ignorant uneducated gullible cultists.
He did. Did you? In case you're wondering why I said that, listen, REALLY LISTEN to her answer. It's never a yes or a no. With these people it's always a carefully worded answer that while it's technically (and legally) true, it's an outright lie.
The problem, dorice, is that you just don't understand the English language. You may think you do, but she's using a lot of words to say "I'm not going to answer your question, no matter how you word it." A simple yes or no would have been sufficient. But she found it necessary to hide behind legalese.
If your students overwhelmingly considered this "gaslighting", then you failed your students. That term has been abused beyond recognition ever since The Atlantic trotted it out back in 2017. What he's using is a common pressure tactic used in courtrooms all across the country. Her answers are also very precisely worded, because she did not deny the substance of the allegation, only the wording. This isn't even close to "gaslighting". Obviously you've latched onto the latest grift of "disinformation expertise", but you need to do better.
Gaslighting is a psyc. Term taught in schools for almost 50 years now son. It is based on a ooollllddd movie. You MAGAots will use your total of 0 knowledge to defend other ignorant fools all so you can cope with ignoring your own personal faults. You fools are so dumb. You loudly and proudly proclaim your vast knowledge without even understanding what the words you use mean.
What about what she's doing? Did you not notice that she refused to say either yes or no to a yes or no question? Instead, she continued to make a short speech which, when carefully examined, was a non sequitur. Actually knowing English, rather than just being able to converse with your fellows using it, is necessary when trying to understand what a judge is saying (or hiding) when the other party has at least as good an understanding as you do.
Another bully boy effort from Kennedy, not listening provoking the person to get her to give him the answer he wants.He seems deliberately deaf to her answers to the same question over and over again. He seems so intelligent yet has no common sense.Or for that matter a sense of respect for the people he questions
Why does he need to have any respect for people he questions? Is there something about their potential position that calls for great respect from an elected official? Does he perhaps know something that YOU don't know about the character of this person?
@ He will know more about the person than me. That is not my point. My point is that every person should be treated with respect. Not bullied into submission.When a person does this they are just big noting themselves rather than gathering information. Politics does not need to be inhumane
@@denisryan898 Perhaps, Just perhaps, the people who he leans on so hard are disrespectful to him? Let's look at her form of response: "Senator! I did not etc". Now what kind of response is that? Starting off with "Senator!" is disrespectful. She's talking down to him as if he isn't qualified to be a senator and doesn't deserve the job. Next she has a rehearsed text that she never deviates from. Want to know why? Because a lawyer has told her to say that and ONLY that in response to his questions. A simple yes or no would not have been legally sufficent --- for her --- because then she would be answering the actual question and could be impeached for lying. But, the form of her response gives the appearance that she's answering the question, when actually she's merely talking around it. I'm surprised (well not really) that you didn't catch any of that. This woman is what one would normally call a "despicable person".
_"This is a violation of about ninety hunnert and twenty seven provisions."_ Not sure what to think when a United States senator speaks in a formal hearing using language _I_ use when I've been drinking with friends. WTH--is that the biggest number he can think of?! It's not even a real number!
So, what else can you do when a judge trying to get a promotion refuses to say yay or nay? You totally missed that part in your haste to condemn Kennedy, didn't you?
@@josedelatorre2569 "coma"? LOL I rest my case. Well done. Excellent adversary. I am humbled. (SMH) If you don't think English is a skill, I advise you to be sure and have a lawyer represent you if you're ever before a judge. Being an attorney is one of the few professions where competence (skill) in a language is absolutely necessary.
Gaslighting an opponent only works if they have done wrong or lied. If they haven't, you just look silly. In this video, both of them are playing word games. But she comes off worse because her rebuttal is basically 'that statement is not 100% word for word what I said.' In other words, she did say the lawsuit was filed to deprive poor people of their vote. She should have just said 'yes, I said that or something along those lines' so she's actually gaslighting him more than the other way round.
@@Axyl-iz5dh I'm unfamiliar with the facts here, but it seems that if that were the case, Kennedy would simply ask her "well what _were_ your exact words then" instead of pretending she didn't tell him several times that he's trusting incorrect info. If we assume she's lying, it seems obvious he should adjust his approach. If we assume she's telling the truth, he just comes across like an overzealous Bond villain.
For what? She came up with a carefully worded answer and stuck to it, in spite of the fact that the question only needed a YES or NO answer. You should really think (or ask an adult) about why that's important.
@@Quakeboy02 She said no, clearly, umpteen times. Kennedy chose not to believe her. He is a nasty piece of work and as thick as a brick. I assume you are related.
Just because you can't understand legalese doesn't mean she actually answered the question. And that's why he's smiling and asking it over and over. Everyone in that room understands what's actually happening. Clearly you are not in that room, because you don't have a clue. And by the way, what's happening is that he's mocking her, and she has to just sit and take it, because she doesn't dare deviate from her answer by even one single word.
If you've got an English professor in your town you could talk to, ask him or her if this woman ever answered the question. Unless they have some ideological dog in the fight, they will laugh and say something like "well, she's not lying, but that's only because she refuses to answer the question."
Why did we ever decide to call “lying”, gaslighting ?
Thing about it is they aren't very good at it either. Parents never gave them the "do something, do it right" lesson.
Lawyer and liar are two similar words 👈✔️
She's a judge. That would make her a lawyer. She had an evasive non-answer and she stuck with it, exactly like *her* lawyer told her to. If she had deviated from that answer by even a tiny bit, she would have been stuck with having to either tell the truth, or risk impeachment.
Amazing
Senator Kennedy, Great man, Great American!!
If i dei before I WoKe
Sounds a little fuzzy to me folks. Deniability won't really work here!!!😮😮😮😊
Well, if she sticks to the wording her defense attorneys dictated to her, they at least can't prosecute her for lying under oath. Of course, that pretty much defines her qualifications for the job.
So where did he get that comment if not from someone at this meeting? By the way is lying under oath to Congress is a felony? Right? Can these "judges" be removed later if they are if they found to have lied under oath?
1. She didn't lie. She just used a bunch of legalese to avoid answering the question. 2. It is very hard to impeach a judge. That's why bright men like Senator Kennedy are so valuable to the vetting process for (pejorative deleted) judges like her.
She didn't lie. In fact, she didn't even answer the question. That's why he kept asking it over and over and over.
Thank God for Sen. Kennedy.
Hong Kong based, china owned, forbes, spreading the word. Uh huh.
Ikr
love the way she does not deny what she said, just says those are not my words, I guess its just her words paraphrased .. lol snake in the grass 101..
He mustve talked to someone who said she said it
No, he makes shyt up all the time.
Someone said is an evil entity
Right, because only dems lie!!!
.... Oh wait... Is that the same senator that stated over 15 times "we have one of our most trusted informant providing us with proof that biden was paid 5 million dollars from barisma"
Until after a 2+ year investigation the "trusted informant" ADMITTED to have no proof AND ADMITTED to have been given that "info" from a RUSSIAN AGENT.
The same russian agent currently sitting in prison at this very moment..
Listen and repeat MAGAots!
Make sure to stay ignorant and NEVER check ANYTHING for yourselves. Enjoy your life of hourly pay and cheaper groceries that your cult leader will provide!
Lolol
Tip: Google who pays TARIFFS
Ignorant uneducated gullible cultists.
What's really happening is that she's using legalese to avoid actually answer his question. Everyone in that room understands that. Why can't you?
Vampires are real
RFK Jr is the actual Foghorn Leghorn.
Are you DEI or Woke? Sometimes I need to ask.
There's no such thing as "gaslighting". Never was. 😉
Classic gaslighting
I see what you did there.
Thou protsesteth much
Lighting the gas by the senator.
Are you proud Louisiana???
@@russellchastain841 Poorest state in the nation, worse educational system and THIS is what he's doing? Instead of helping his constituents?
@@signalfire6 So, truth is less than constituency? That's like saying expediency is all that matters.
Pigheaded, he literally can't hear the answer that's not in his head
Just because it's not the answer you want to hear doesn't mean he's wrong.
@@Quakeboy02 maybe, but he clearly shows his bigotry
@@eugenemurtagh2085 There's no bigotry involved, except for in your head.
Kennedy listen !!!!!!!!
He did. Did you? In case you're wondering why I said that, listen, REALLY LISTEN to her answer. It's never a yes or a no. With these people it's always a carefully worded answer that while it's technically (and legally) true, it's an outright lie.
This Senator is living proof of how millions of tax dollars are wasted
Bullshit…she said and is lying thru her teeth…
The problem, dorice, is that you just don't understand the English language. You may think you do, but she's using a lot of words to say "I'm not going to answer your question, no matter how you word it." A simple yes or no would have been sufficient. But she found it necessary to hide behind legalese.
If your students overwhelmingly considered this "gaslighting", then you failed your students. That term has been abused beyond recognition ever since The Atlantic trotted it out back in 2017. What he's using is a common pressure tactic used in courtrooms all across the country. Her answers are also very precisely worded, because she did not deny the substance of the allegation, only the wording. This isn't even close to "gaslighting".
Obviously you've latched onto the latest grift of "disinformation expertise", but you need to do better.
Sounds good, thanks for sharing
Gaslighting is a psyc. Term taught in schools for almost 50 years now son. It is based on a ooollllddd movie.
You MAGAots will use your total of 0 knowledge to defend other ignorant fools all so you can cope with ignoring your own personal faults.
You fools are so dumb. You loudly and proudly proclaim your vast knowledge without even understanding what the words you use mean.
What about what she's doing? Did you not notice that she refused to say either yes or no to a yes or no question? Instead, she continued to make a short speech which, when carefully examined, was a non sequitur. Actually knowing English, rather than just being able to converse with your fellows using it, is necessary when trying to understand what a judge is saying (or hiding) when the other party has at least as good an understanding as you do.
What a Dork....
RFk lied as usual.
Actually, yet another liberal judge refused to answer a question from him, and used her non-answer to run down the clock.
He is a fn TOOL....
Another bully boy effort from Kennedy, not listening provoking the person to get her to give him the answer he wants.He seems deliberately deaf to her answers to the same question over and over again. He seems so intelligent yet has no common sense.Or for that matter a sense of respect for the people he questions
Why does he need to have any respect for people he questions? Is there something about their potential position that calls for great respect from an elected official? Does he perhaps know something that YOU don't know about the character of this person?
@ He will know more about the person than me. That is not my point. My point is that every person should be treated with respect. Not bullied into submission.When a person does this they are just big noting themselves rather than gathering information. Politics does not need to be inhumane
@@denisryan898 Perhaps, Just perhaps, the people who he leans on so hard are disrespectful to him? Let's look at her form of response: "Senator! I did not etc". Now what kind of response is that? Starting off with "Senator!" is disrespectful. She's talking down to him as if he isn't qualified to be a senator and doesn't deserve the job. Next she has a rehearsed text that she never deviates from. Want to know why? Because a lawyer has told her to say that and ONLY that in response to his questions. A simple yes or no would not have been legally sufficent --- for her --- because then she would be answering the actual question and could be impeached for lying. But, the form of her response gives the appearance that she's answering the question, when actually she's merely talking around it. I'm surprised (well not really) that you didn't catch any of that. This woman is what one would normally call a "despicable person".
@@denisryan898 She isn't respecting him in any way, by refusing to answer his question. So, why would she deserve his respect?
_"This is a violation of about ninety hunnert and twenty seven provisions."_
Not sure what to think when a United States senator speaks in a formal hearing using language _I_ use when I've been drinking with friends.
WTH--is that the biggest number he can think of?! It's not even a real number!
It's called a joke, son.
@@robertreid2931 That's an inappropriate platform to be making jokes. The Senator broke eleventy hundred billlion ethical codes by making that joke.
@@IkeDOC2378berj5-k And looked good doin it. Love Senator Kennedy, the man is brilliant!
So, what else can you do when a judge trying to get a promotion refuses to say yay or nay? You totally missed that part in your haste to condemn Kennedy, didn't you?
Smuck
She is lying as usual.
fingernails on a chalk board are like a symphony compared to Kennedy's logic and voice.
English isn't your strongest skill, is it?
@@Quakeboy02 you doth protest too much me thinks. By the way, English is a language, not a skill
@@Quakeboy02 your coma is superfluous in a seven word question.
@@josedelatorre2569 "coma"? LOL I rest my case. Well done. Excellent adversary. I am humbled. (SMH) If you don't think English is a skill, I advise you to be sure and have a lawyer represent you if you're ever before a judge. Being an attorney is one of the few professions where competence (skill) in a language is absolutely necessary.
@@Quakeboy02 good advice..especially for tRUMP
He is a legend she lying
Captain mush mouth, how is violence in your state and what are you doing to fix it. Nothing, nothing nothing.
Shutup
'Gaslighting' doesn't work if you don't lie.
Elaborate
Gaslighting an opponent only works if they have done wrong or lied. If they haven't, you just look silly. In this video, both of them are playing word games. But she comes off worse because her rebuttal is basically 'that statement is not 100% word for word what I said.' In other words, she did say the lawsuit was filed to deprive poor people of their vote. She should have just said 'yes, I said that or something along those lines' so she's actually gaslighting him more than the other way round.
@@Axyl-iz5dh I'm unfamiliar with the facts here, but it seems that if that were the case, Kennedy would simply ask her "well what _were_ your exact words then" instead of pretending she didn't tell him several times that he's trusting incorrect info.
If we assume she's lying, it seems obvious he should adjust his approach.
If we assume she's telling the truth, he just comes across like an overzealous Bond villain.
@@zedmelon Kennedy's been doing this a while, he's very familiar with the 'I don't recall' line.
'Well, what were your words then?'
'I don't recall'
@@Axyl-iz5dh My assumption was correct that you're not worth my time. Thanks!
In the unlikely event Kennedy had the guts to repeat his accusation outside of Congress, she should sue the ass off him.
For what? She came up with a carefully worded answer and stuck to it, in spite of the fact that the question only needed a YES or NO answer. You should really think (or ask an adult) about why that's important.
@@Quakeboy02 She said no, clearly, umpteen times. Kennedy chose not to believe her. He is a nasty piece of work and as thick as a brick. I assume you are related.
Liar
Still talking about conspiracy and fake info? Better make sure to tone down before new administration.
Keeping it is kind of unhealthy for you.😊
Four years of nothing but fake news, coming soon.
We will continue to do our work in part because of comments like this.
@@cambridgedisinformationsum6949 😂😂 weak.
You are so bad you needed to invent a new language to mitigate this =/
You sir how's your heart feeling I would be thinking this feeling like shit inside of you.
He is a moron. Please vote him out.
Just because you can't understand legalese doesn't mean she actually answered the question. And that's why he's smiling and asking it over and over. Everyone in that room understands what's actually happening. Clearly you are not in that room, because you don't have a clue. And by the way, what's happening is that he's mocking her, and she has to just sit and take it, because she doesn't dare deviate from her answer by even one single word.
I can't stand that idiot from my home state of Louisiana
I'm sure that makes him lose sleep at night.
Kennedy sucks. All the good ones are gone.
If you've got an English professor in your town you could talk to, ask him or her if this woman ever answered the question. Unless they have some ideological dog in the fight, they will laugh and say something like "well, she's not lying, but that's only because she refuses to answer the question."
I HATE Kennedy!
I'm sure that troubles him.
senator..have you no shame..
And you only have very basic English skills.
Rfk was very annoying i don't like him he tries to torture that poor women shame on him
DEI much?