I was comparing the same two models a few months ago and ended up buying the CX-5 akrea G35 also in this polymetal grey color, absolutely loving it, glad I made the right choice 😄
This is a very good comparison of two excellent cars! Some additional thoughts: 1) The CX-60 G40e Evolve is currently $56.99k driveaway. With the $4k luxury pack (including real leather and full Vision Package with touchscreen), it's $61k. There are no other cars at this price point with a 6 cylinder engine. 2) The CX5 G35 Akera is currently $55.648k driveaway. If you forego the turbo power, it's only $53k. A bargain... 3) You said the CX-60 PHEV is close to $90k. Mazda's online configurator has it as $70k driveaway. 4) The CX-60 rear-seat space is handy if you need rear-racing child seats. The CX-5 requires that the front seat be moved forward. Also, The CX-5 payload capacity is 445kg and the CX-60 is 579kg.
These are limited time promotional offers, but you make a good point. If you see discounts like this, it's worth doing the math to see if they will save you money.
I Have a 2024 mazda cx5 spgt turbo and love every part of it. It has the power i need and a very roomy car. i have been a MAZDA Buyer for many years and wont look at any other model car. Mazda all the way 😊😍✊💪
@@carsales I Have Had 9 mazdas since 2007 never had issues with any of them bought a hyundai veloster brand new in 2016 was a total lemon never hyundai again. mazda kicks butt 😎👌💯💪
My wife is looking to trade her 2017 CX5 on either a new CX5 or CX60, my daughter is looking to replace her CX3 in on a CX30, but I will keep my 2012 manual 6 Luxury Sports hatch a while longer as it seems Mazda has dropped the 6, all have been incredibly reliable and satisfying cars to own.
The auto in the CX-60/-70/-80/-90 is not a single-clutch automatic in the traditional sense (Alfa Selespeed for example). It’s the same setup as AMG’s Speedshift MCT. The gearbox itself is the same inside as a torque converter auto (planetary gear sets), but in place of a torque converter it has a multi-plate wet-clutch. The clutch is only used when stationary, during take-off and very low speed manoeuvring, at all other times it is fully engaged.
For me, it's the CX5 i don't like the 48-volt mild hybrid or the clutch in the transmission in the CX 60. If it had no mild hybrid and a torque converter auto, it would be a winner. 😊
this is my line of thinking also. I love the CX60 in the looks department, but the 48v MHEV portion of the car has me skeptical. Plus, I also don't like the driver monitoring on any vehicle. Completely unnecessary IMHO and I'd hate to see how intrusive it ends up being in the long run.
Unfortunately we still dont have the 6 zylinder petrol engine CX-60 in Europe just the phev and the diesel versions. And the CX-5 doesnt have a turbo, has just 194 PS...😢
Here in Finland, the inline 6 gasoline CX-60 is not available. I drove a 2024 CX-60 plug in. The suspension is too bouncy. The transition from the gasoline engine and full electric is definitely not smooth, as the transmission is jerky. It’s a beautiful SUV, but OMG, the transmission, suspension, and first generation hybrid system need to be massively refined.
Good to know...i was choosing here in Estonia between 10K driven CX-60 PHEV or new CX-5 2.5 with all the extras for 5k less. I took CX-5, because it is a sure thing.
I'm really happy with this price point comparison, we are looking to replace my wife's 2017 CX-5 with either of these 2 cars reviewed trim levels, had been leaning towards the CX-5 again but a CX-60 with its issues ironed out and an IL6 makes a compelling argument...
@@John451vfr I own a CX-60 PHEV mainly the because the tax code is making the Inline 6 50% more expensive. As it happens with completely new platforms there where some issues although they Neve stranded me. After 2 recalls fixing dumpers, as pump from the hybrid system and a software update on the transmission at the ver beginning I am very happy with the car at 40K travelled. Of course if you want to safe on gas only a home charger will do the magic. Still for long trips a inline 6 is unbeatable.
Subaru have this driver monitoring feature in their cars and its incredibly intrusive if you happen to look at anything other than whats directly in front you. If Mazda's are the same format, its a no from me. If they had a function permanently disable this feature rather than having to navigate a menu to turn it off ever time you get back in the car, I think it would sway more people over.
Never forget Mazda Tribute V6 the worst gas-guzzling sport utility vehicle I've ever seen with most obsolete column auto transmission and rear drum brakes with complex mechanics cost an eye-watering repair bills and let's not forget a dumb old 2.3 4 cylinder smelt like regular and growled like a Datsun Stanza.
If they brought back that badge with the BT50 engine and driveline, I would certainly consider checking one out. But alas, no off road SUV in that segment.
Mazda customers loyal?... Hmm I am clearly not one of them I rather pay a little more and get NX 350h rather than cx 60.. It seems sales figure on my side Mazda sale almost 10X cx5 than CX60. And even NX outsell them.
I was comparing the same two models a few months ago and ended up buying the CX-5 akrea G35 also in this polymetal grey color, absolutely loving it, glad I made the right choice 😄
This is a very good comparison of two excellent cars! Some additional thoughts:
1) The CX-60 G40e Evolve is currently $56.99k driveaway. With the $4k luxury pack (including real leather and full Vision Package with touchscreen), it's $61k. There are no other cars at this price point with a 6 cylinder engine.
2) The CX5 G35 Akera is currently $55.648k driveaway. If you forego the turbo power, it's only $53k. A bargain...
3) You said the CX-60 PHEV is close to $90k. Mazda's online configurator has it as $70k driveaway.
4) The CX-60 rear-seat space is handy if you need rear-racing child seats. The CX-5 requires that the front seat be moved forward. Also, The CX-5 payload capacity is 445kg and the CX-60 is 579kg.
I'm interested in RWD CX-60 price leader. 6 cylinders and RWD no one else offers that in Australia.
These are limited time promotional offers, but you make a good point. If you see discounts like this, it's worth doing the math to see if they will save you money.
I Have a 2024 mazda cx5 spgt turbo and love every part of it. It has the power i need and a very roomy car. i have been a MAZDA Buyer for many years and wont look at any other model car. Mazda all the way 😊😍✊💪
More evidence that Mazda owners are very loyal.
@@carsales I Have Had 9 mazdas since 2007 never had issues with any of them bought a hyundai veloster brand new in 2016 was a total lemon never hyundai again. mazda kicks butt 😎👌💯💪
My wife is looking to trade her 2017 CX5 on either a new CX5 or CX60, my daughter is looking to replace her CX3 in on a CX30, but I will keep my 2012 manual 6 Luxury Sports hatch a while longer as it seems Mazda has dropped the 6, all have been incredibly reliable and satisfying cars to own.
actually a great car breakdown. Thank you
I have a 2023 Akera turbo.
ZOOM ZOOM 😎
The cx5 is just a very difficult car to beat
Agreed. Still a very competent and compelling product.
The auto in the CX-60/-70/-80/-90 is not a single-clutch automatic in the traditional sense (Alfa Selespeed for example). It’s the same setup as AMG’s Speedshift MCT. The gearbox itself is the same inside as a torque converter auto (planetary gear sets), but in place of a torque converter it has a multi-plate wet-clutch.
The clutch is only used when stationary, during take-off and very low speed manoeuvring, at all other times it is fully engaged.
Good point, but for many potential owners it will be a moot point. The fact is the gearbox needs finessing and more fine-tuning.
For me, it's the CX5 i don't like the 48-volt mild hybrid or the clutch in the transmission in the CX 60. If it had no mild hybrid and a torque converter auto, it would be a winner. 😊
I agree 100%
good breakdown thank you
this is my line of thinking also. I love the CX60 in the looks department, but the 48v MHEV portion of the car has me skeptical. Plus, I also don't like the driver monitoring on any vehicle. Completely unnecessary IMHO and I'd hate to see how intrusive it ends up being in the long run.
Unfortunately we still dont have the 6 zylinder petrol engine CX-60 in Europe just the phev and the diesel versions.
And the CX-5 doesnt have a turbo, has just 194 PS...😢
Probably the next update of CX-60 is worth waiting to fully iron out its suspension/transmission issues reported
Yep, fair call. The foundations are there for a genuinely premium-feeling six-cylinder cruiser. Just needs a few crucial tweaks.
The cx-60 needs further refinement. I love the 6 cyl diesel option, but the rest of the car needs to match the potential of the new engine.
Single owner the CX5 fits perfectly but for that roar six cylinder I think I'd go that extra room, with the vision pack.
Here in Finland, the inline 6 gasoline CX-60 is not available. I drove a 2024 CX-60 plug in. The suspension is too bouncy. The transition from the gasoline engine and full electric is definitely not smooth, as the transmission is jerky. It’s a beautiful SUV, but OMG, the transmission, suspension, and first generation hybrid system need to be massively refined.
Good to know...i was choosing here in Estonia between 10K driven CX-60 PHEV or new CX-5 2.5 with all the extras for 5k less. I took CX-5, because it is a sure thing.
did you drive in Sanctuary Lakes? looks very familiar
Yes, we did! But we call it SUV paradise.
so is the cx60 replacing the cx5 in the states?? we don't have the cx50 here in usa. anybody know????????
cx60 I mean
No, CX-60 and CX-80 will not be sold in USA.
You get CX-70 and CX-90 as well as CX-5 and CX-50.
Recently drive cx60 petrol, fuel consumption showed 19.4L per 100k
Holly molly thats a lot
Rearward visibility in Australia is over-hyped. What’s it for? To see the tailgater behind?
In Europe cx-5 cargo space have 522 L
Interesting every reviewer complains about suspension tuning
It was too firm, now it's wishy washy...
A similar trim comparison would be more helpful.
I'm really happy with this price point comparison, we are looking to replace my wife's 2017 CX-5 with either of these 2 cars reviewed trim levels, had been leaning towards the CX-5 again but a CX-60 with its issues ironed out and an IL6 makes a compelling argument...
@@John451vfr I own a CX-60 PHEV mainly the because the tax code is making the Inline 6 50% more expensive. As it happens with completely new platforms there where some issues although they Neve stranded me. After 2 recalls fixing dumpers, as pump from the hybrid system and a software update on the transmission at the ver beginning I am very happy with the car at 40K travelled. Of course if you want to safe on gas only a home charger will do the magic. Still for long trips a inline 6 is unbeatable.
I ❤ mazdas
Mazda has always been stingy on space on their better driving cars especially rear seats.
CX60 Full hybrid
A good option, but the PHEV is more expensive by a big margin.
I wish Mazda had just made a regular strong hybrid instead of an expensive plug in hybrid
No CX 60 in US. 🙁
Did you say head check ✅. With the new car's with cameras looking at you, it's a no no 😂
Subaru have this driver monitoring feature in their cars and its incredibly intrusive if you happen to look at anything other than whats directly in front you. If Mazda's are the same format, its a no from me. If they had a function permanently disable this feature rather than having to navigate a menu to turn it off ever time you get back in the car, I think it would sway more people over.
concentrate and drive the car, don't let the tech do the work no wonder there is so many accidents
Please Mazda…. Ship the 60 to North America!
The current CX-5 came out in 2017. That’s not 10 years ago…
Your math is spot on.
🙏🙏🙏🙏
Cx5
Never forget Mazda Tribute V6 the worst gas-guzzling sport utility vehicle I've ever seen with most obsolete column auto transmission and rear drum brakes with complex mechanics cost an eye-watering repair bills and let's not forget a dumb old 2.3 4 cylinder smelt like regular and growled like a Datsun Stanza.
It wasn't easy on the eye either...
Yep. Those were the days of their partnership with Ford.... It's not one to missed!
If they brought back that badge with the BT50 engine and driveline, I would certainly consider checking one out. But alas, no off road SUV in that segment.
Mazda customers loyal?... Hmm I am clearly not one of them I rather pay a little more and get NX 350h rather than cx 60.. It seems sales figure on my side Mazda sale almost 10X cx5 than CX60. And even NX outsell them.
Cx5