Rupert Sheldrake: Morphogenesis - A New Science of Life
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
- Why do many natural phenomenons elude from conventional explanations of natural sciences?
At the Quantica Symposium Dr Rupert Sheldrake explains the origin of the materialistic world view and why this isn't capable of describing observable effects like telepathy, for example.
Instead, Sheldrake's hypothesis of "morphic resonance" can illuminate other phenomenons of communications. Thus he describes rats having learned to orient themselves in a maze seem to pass what they learned to conspecifics outside their own group. Even with humans this effect can be observed.
►►More information: exopolitik.org
►►Subscribe to Exopolitik here! bit.ly/Subscrib...
►►Exopolitik on Facebook: exopolitik
►►Exopolitik on Twitter: / exopolitik
I could listen to this man talk all day
👍
👍
Matches_Malone perhaps you should... ;)
Same here 🖐.
Sheldrake is one few people in the world i would love to sit down and have a science and philosophical chat with while having tea and biscuits
Rupert is definitely one of the most intellectual men around, wish Terrence was still with us here on the physical plane....
"What is now proved was once only imagined." -William Blake
Thank you, Rupert, for all your hard work. Your ability to scientifically articulate such phenomena (which "some of us" seem to have been-born-with experiencing as a part of our Normal [the true sense of the word] way of life and ordinary Feel-SEEing). Take care of your health, and don't let those animal-nature-based-body-mind-intellectuals put you in any state of dis- EASE. They are Spiritally Asleep. The world needs you Now.
Wow! What an amazing talk...Dr. Sheldrake is surely on to something!
Sheldrake is entirely right about this. It will take 50-100 years for science to cope with the idea that the sum is more than its parts. Something anyone with a pulse knows.
+Jugi Blazkowski lol
Alfred Do tell us how you know. I take it you can adduce some empirical evidence to support what you claim to know.
Alfred Mayer veracity true
downharrison Well said ! I cannot understand how people can believe such nonsense but, as the man said: " There is one born every minute"
Victorious Yankee " He is a poor scientist" I disagree. He is no kind of scientist .
last night at about 5pm I was doing research into morphic fields and this topic in general after reading for hours and watching yt vids I fell asleep, I had a dream about a distant friend I haven't talked to in 5 years, I woke up and thought about what I had just dreamed of and remembered my friend clearly, several minutes later I get a message from him on facebook and it was 4am where he lives in Europe, the odds of this happening are really low and this isn't the only instance of this happening this synchronicity these "coincidences" are increasing in frequency and complexity, its starting to really blow my mind there is definitely something to this.
I'm glad we as a species are exploring these concepts.
I think we as a species would be a lot richer if this quack and all of his followers died in an instance.
Absolutely brilliant speech. Thanks for posting.
Our "science" today is shackled by orthodoxy and the fear of radical new ideas. Sheldrake is brave, original thinker who, as a post below suggests, will not be appreciated in his time, like so many of the greatest scientists of history.
He is simply not a great scientist, and not even a scientist!
I agree. He is amazing....
@@mosesgarcia9443 He is branded as a pseudoscientist since the early 1980's. An imposter with a quack's ideas!!! Don't be fooled, you gullible folks!
@@GeoCoppens He most certainly is a scientist. He’s has a doctorate in biology.
@@melodytannerclark Wrong! He is a chartatan and has no stature in the scientific community!
When I was younger a friend and I noted all random moments we thought of each other, a simple thought wondering how we're doing and then the phone would ring. Weeks, months, it seemed to happen right before the phone rang
Another brilliant speech Rupert, thank you for that shining ball of light in a darkness mate !!!
Idea of morphic fields and a shared memory in that fields is another brilliant idea and explains lot of phenomena that we see and feel in everyday life and what east cultures know from thousands of years.
my cat is at the door when I come home,
often Iknow who is coming for a cut before I get to work.
I can't believe they're going to figure out antimater by smashing atoms together. and didn't Paul DIrac discover an equation that suggested an alternate reality = in every way to the current reality. hence the "spooky action at a distance thing.
There absolutely is an Amazing connection amoung all things on all levels. and that's a Beautiful celebration in and of itself..
this talk made me happy in so many ways.
thank you Dr. Sheldrake.
best talk I've listened too in a while.
may blessings surround you Always.
Rupert is one of a kind. A brilliant mind who can even make a dog conscious and aware
I absolutely love all his videos.
Science has a long way to go, and Sheldrake is on track!
not2tees Pointing in the wrong direction.!
+yankee - So we found the God particle, does that mean god exists? I will say here that you are brainwashed by modern science and its whole 'standard model'. Rupert needs not find any fucking particle because particles are round little billiard balls that modern science talks about like they were playing a ball game. Open your damn closed mind and listen to the true truth. That is what you want, isn't it? The truth. Well the truth is not a particle, I guarantee that. Oh but what if we found the truth particle? Then, I guess you would have found THE TRUTH.
+Victorious Yankee Perhaps you could discover that answer for yourself but then I doubt it.
+Victorious Yankee Is it light?
I enjoy a telepathic connection with a cat that I like, which will not surprise many people, because it's quite common. What surprises me more, is that I can usually tell if my individual houseplants are happy or unhappy, and also perceive the cause of their discomfort - just by looking at them from across the room. They seem to emanate some kind of aura, or presence, which I cannot physically see, but nevertheless can perceive on some level. I believe that this empathy, or sensitivity, is largely what is meant when we say a gardener has 'green fingers'. I wonder to what extent empathy, or love are a feature of, or are closely related to morphic resonance?!
Great scientist, great teacher, and a beautiful man. Many thanks to dr Rupert Sheldrake from this Sufi mystic.
In 100 years, the name Rupert Sheldrake will evoke the same sense of respect that we now feel for Charles Darwin, and the reaction of the modern scientific community to his ideas will be thought of in the same light as we now see the reaction of the Catholic church to the theory of Evolution.
The reaction to Rupert Sheldrake by present scientific dogmatics is analogous to the Catholic Church to Galileo. In the age of the Net, however, along with the increase in the MAGNITUDE of the complexity of our ethos, I suspect while he may make a ripple, mostly he will not be detected among noise. He is like Gregor Mendel, if he is remembered at all and that will be by accident.
John Lloyd Scharf He will be remembered by the very way he spent the last hour explaining his hypothesis. MR. The next time I see someone on Time Team 'napping' flints like they were going out of fashion, I can smugly say to myself, 'ah MR'.
IbnBahtuta Why?
+Jake Godfrey My understanding is that the Catholic church is not opposed to evolution.
Reductionist Pope John Paul II was the first to accept evolution, and he has only been dead 10 years. Besides, his Scientist leanings were not well accepted by the radical right, and this very vocal faction has yet to come around. Maybe I should have said `Catholic church in the 20th century`. But if you want to see how hated Mr. Sheldrake currently is by the atheist scientific establishment, try posting about MR in any forum where these people congregate, and get ready to see the trolls pour out of the woodworks.
18:58 I'm American, and even I laughed, lol. That was good.
'"The hero is the one who, while still alive, knows and represents the claims of the superconsciousness which throughout creation is more or less unconscious."
Joseph Campbell.
Dear Dr. Rupert Shelldrake. Thank you for such a fantastic work you have done. You have changed my perceptions of almost everything in medicine. I am a Dr. in Ayurvedic and Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naturalism, Cancer, and Alternative Medicine. You are a beam of light for my life.
+bionaturismo First off, what I find disturbing is the fact that you mention both Cancer and Alternative Medicine all together, apart from all that other nonsensical fields. Most importantly(!) delusions such as the ones propagated by Mr. Sheldrake wont do anyone any good, especially no one who has a med degree (how did that happen?). Cancer and alternative medicine should never go along.
Oliver Well said but your words will be lost on Sheldrake's gullible followers.
This is MIND BLOWING!!!
brilliant and fascinating.....explains a lot.
There was a time where the world was flat and humans couldn't fly. Maybe this guy is just ahead of his time.
He is such an inquisitive man one of the deepest thinking scientist's I have ever heard what a treasure he is.
My ex has epilepsy and I would start to know I needed to go home or check on him without us talking or communication. I definitely knew when he would be in need. We broke up. Still friends and I moved across the country. It is going away as we seperate. But still there. Have that with my sister's too. I came to caretaker my older sister when she had a hysterectomy. Apperantly arpund the time she was in surgery, I began to bleed amd cramp. It was noy my time for menstruation.
Fascia/connective tissue is the human bodies transport medium for morphic resonance. This collagenous proteinacious cell exudate is quartz like in its structure and action moving information instantly anywhere! This non-living ubiquitous protein is the perfect medium for movement of vibrations/information, maybe storage of memories. When you stretch or massage fascia, you become the bodies adjustable tuning fork also eliciting memories.
"Our bodies remain more or less the same shape over many years, people can still recognize us when we meet them after ten or twenty years. But almost all the molecules in our bodies have changed and many of the cells have changed. Yet the form remains. And I think this is because of self-resonance. We resonate with our selves and this maintains a continuity of form. I think this also the basis of memory. I think when you remember what you did yesterday or last year, or when you were a child, I don't think those memories are stored inside your brain. I think that it's because you are similar to yourself, you're resonating with yourself in the past, and the memories as it were leap across space. From you in the past, across space and time. From you in the past to you in the present. By a kind of resonance." Rupert Sheldrake, Morphogenesis
i really think it would make science in general and especially biology way more pleasurable to study
Danke für diesen gelungenen Mitschnitt, der mich dazu brachte das Buch "Der Wissenschaftswahn" von Herr Sheldrake zu lesen. Ich fand das Buch aufgrund der Masse an Informationen und Beispielen über weite Strecken anstrengend (und tendenziös), aber letztlich erhellend und kann es jedem, der an der Entwicklungsgeschichte der modernen Wissenschaften interessiert ist, empfehlen. Es bleibt die Hoffnung, dass Herr Sheldrakes kritische Gedanken einigen Wissenschaftlern helfen werden in Zukunft die richtigen Fragen zu stellen und neue Wege zu gehen.
Thanks you Dr. Sheldrake. This opens up a lot of doors. Here's a Funny little thought I had while listening to this (my pure speculation). Dr Sheldrake said we are most alike to our past selves (through time, lets call it the Ego), somewhat less to our relatives, then to humanity and so on in a decreasing manner. if we are most in resonance with our selves, then when that self is momentarily turned down or annhilated (psychedelics maybe) the visions that people experience are what we resonate with down the line in the resonance hierarchy accessing what's more human than our resonance to our selves.
This may also mean that evolution may not be blind after all, the "nature" in natural selection becomming a well informed habit of past actions.
We need scientist like you Mr sheldrake
Thank you to hold the voice so high, touching the heaven, it's fantastic! I came to those same conclusions by (myself) a few years ago. I'm still having doubt about the consciousness of minerals. But alas, I never had the opportunity of talking about it to anyone. It's way far off of reporting the sport news report, so I do fight with spirits. There or not, they do answer me anyway! Really keep up your program, maybe I'm not the only christian alive + the power of litterature is immense, as proof to that is that my teacher of good manners is Oscar Wilde, lol.
This just seems like common sense to me. Man, we think we're advanced, but we're no better than those who thought the world was flat.
LightOfKukulkan Exactly.
LightOfKukulkan Exactly, LOK.
Every era has assumed their great sages to be correct and rise in fear and ignorance when common accepted new thought is raised. The thinking Wo/Man must always be the honest skeptic; skeptical of accepted thought and of new ideas. All must be challenged.
• When the gatekeepers lock the doors to new challenges to accepted ideas, then true science may be impeded. Even well thought out possibilities may have the odd gem of understanding to add to discussions.
Namaste and care,
mhikl
***** Sheldrake's followers know the earth is not flat; it's bumpy in many places.
***** I got your point.
***** Actually, Flat Earth as a concept was invented long after civilization understood astronomy from the Chaldean people in the city of Ur, the homeland of Abraham. It is a blind ally, like astrology, phlogiston, ..
We today are living in changing / morphic times. The planets core is changing, the atmosphere of the planet is changing and even the humans living on the planet are changing as well.
Annoying adverts but good talk.
his hypothesis would explain a lot of things, i've notices skateboarders just get better and better and it really does seem like each one picks up where the other one left off
***** Have you noticed how they all wear their baseball caps back to front ? Clear evidence of MR.
Reductionist they've started wearing them the right way around again, it's a fun theory though, MR, as you've taken the care to abbreviate it, there's nothing crazy about it, it's just an interesting way of looking at things
A Stone for Chronos..yes..Embrace the Myth< Awaken your legend, Branson as well>
SIr Shelldrake% DK
the evolution of "art" points to the value of cooperation.
idea that promotes "competition" is for material gain at the expense of another.
Sheldrake is the Copernicus of consciousness research.
"But first I'll just talk about this using plain language in terms of habits.The theory of morphic resonance says that similar patterns of activity are influenced by similar past patterns that happened before. There is an influence,...a kind of resonant of similarity across time and space from the past to the present." Morphogenesis, Rupert Sheldrake
Myeles it actually is very difficult to find a way it works. So far it is indistinguishable from quantum tunneling and entanglement which is probabilistic and chaotic and can be decohered by complex environments. There could be a quantum imprinting of a suddenly formed structure creating a quantum ghost-like entity that would be pure computational consciousness, quantum morphic resonance it should be called. They could be compressed and infinite copying as well.
I have listened to Dr Sheldrake with an open mind and a willingness to learn new perspectives. One thing I find very troubling is the claim that memory is not in the brain. So why do people suffering from dementia and Alzheimer's manifest changes in the brain? Help me understand please
Images are not stored in your television, but you can stop the TV set showing images properly by tampering with the TV set, but that does not confirm the images are from inside the TV set. Sheldrake likens the mind to a TV's transmitter / receiver; and less like a dvd recorder, which does contain the images on Its owns hard drive.
Tod UK When will you learn that analogies can be invented to illustrate but NOT PROVE anything. Proof requires hard evidence. Sheldrake offers none .He appears not to have heard of neuroscience.
Myles Lawless yeah, I suspect he hasn't heard of neuroscience, good point.
babettemunchkin maybe the mind is in a way kinda like a radio, and memories and thoughts like a radio show, if the radio is not working you only get fragments of the show or nothing at all.
John Maybe the mind is like a doughnut, a bicycle or anything else you care to mention. Memory is constructed by the brain as a result of neural activity. Ask any neuroscientist, something which Sheldrake has failed to do. Have you noticed that he never mentions the findings of neuroscience ? Either he is not aware of what research can tell us ,or he avoids the issue because it would undermine the nonsense he talks.
Morphic resonance
by Barry H Mansfield
Rupert Sheldrake has noticed something quite amazing.
Through his research he sees a pattern of behavioral events
facilitating the ability of future generations to excel.
Based on previously learned behavior of their forebears
generations upon generations the more who learn an idea or process
results in future generations learning it better and faster
with less trouble and fewer mistakes.
This leads me to the idea of consciousness
and where and what it comes from
forming in my mind the hypothesis
that our brains are transmitter receivers with amazing coalition potential.
If this bit of investigation and speculation are not amazing enough
imagine this
an energy field of conscious morphic resonance
directing and retaining the structure of ourselves and all we perceive.
I don’t know, still, I believe this could be true.
How about you
just try to think it through.
Excellent. Thank you for posting !!!
brilliant!
Thank you Rupert
The simplest thing would be if nothing existed, but since everything exist then second most simple answer would be that everything exist. I think this could be argued.
great thank you
How does the morphic field “know” that two similar species are in fact a different species and should have separate memories in the field?
The question is what is the definition for “similarity “ ? According to what? The dna? The shape?
I had a lot of unexplainable experiences
and I know
he's absolutely right
I will explain those experiences for you, it was me, the knocking on the door, me. the squeaking floorboards, me. it was me!!!
koron You are guilty of a logical fallacy.
koron So have we all but we don't jump to mysticism as Sheldrake would have us do. Where is his evidence ?
My family is extremely close. We are all aware of each other at all times. I even have a relationship with a tree from a house I used to own.
Christine Wiersum My dog has a wonderful relationship with a tree. I think he must be telepathic.
Multiverses can be thought of in our vision, but also more , multiple additional universes alongside ours. Discover antigravity and you will break this barrier.
So many informative information.love it😍
I've woken up at 2 am to randomly start researching a topic that someone else ends up asking me about or telling me that they are thinking or learning about a subject.
Like super random. For example. One time I woke up and started researching German fairy folklore. Was not looking at that at all before. My sister calls me almost as soon as I'm done.. She woke up early and told me she was really curious about the faye and how they interact with humans. I was able to just send her all the research I just finished.
It seems really that this is simply a more realist and fluid version of the theory of the forms. While the forms don't exist in some other reality and remain fixed, such as in Platonic thought, he still argues that there are forms and that they inform matter of what it aught to be. His forms seem to be... somewhere in the middle, not really in the material, and not really in some other place, but I suppose also he uses a more ethereal/idealistic understanding of matter, (which does adhere well to quantum theory).
+Asa Bruss It's also bewildering how many commentators immediately jump to the conclusion that he's fostering some sort of religion with these propositions. This might give credit to his point about the humanist assumptions.
Asa See some of his later stuff such as rediscovering God, the Physics of Angels and lots more crap. He is pushing religion. He is a practising Roman Catholic..
"But I think a much better metaphor is habit. I think the Universe has habits, not laws. And I think the regularities of nature depend on what's happened before. There is a kind of memory in Nature." Morphogenesis - Rupert Sheldrake
thank you - This was a very good lection.
I believe it was Nikola Tesla who quoted 'mankind/scientists can/could learn more in a decade than in the last 100yrs if they were to focus more on the supernatural/paranormal........................................God Bless Rupert Sheldrake.
The stories he Is telling about the 7th sense of animals and telepathy and funny fields to explain frequently observed animal behaviour is just putting a lot of pixie dust on something that really doesn’t require it. The wolves who hunt over huge distances and still come together to their pack and to rear their young don’t need a mysterious field for that, they have memory, they have a sense of orientation, they use markers, they have a sense of time. That’s also why your cat knows when to come home. The interactions between birds in a flock or fish in a school have also been quite well understood in simple formal rule systems and in fact partially be verified by computational emulation. To then call the mathematical representation of the interactions as the laws underlying a postulated field is of course borrowing from physics where forces are described by modelling the interactions between particles as fields.
In morphogenesis, e.g., developments of the organisation of a body plan in growth of an organisms we also don’t really need fields: it’s often at least describable by systematic local interactions for pattern formation - often by reaction diffusion equations. And there is gene expression partially controlled by signals from different parts of a cell membrane reacting to chemical concentration gradients, not some mysterious field. Another example is formation of lung tissue, or for example the branching of growing trees, where there is specific gene regulation that determines how often an air duct has to split, or at what angle tree branching occurs. It’s always both mysterious but usually explainable at least in some rudimentary form. Certainly there is always so much more unknown to be discovered, and there is no end of that wonder in sight. For example it’s not understood why animals often anticipate earthquakes, but do they have to have clairvoyance for that? Or is it that evolution somehow equipped them with sensing patterns of changes in electric fields, changes of groundwater levels, merely based on known physics but not yet understood how it generates sensory stimuli that safe the herd, when they suddenly know they have to move to higher ground before a tsunami and sometimes even before the earthquake that causes it. I like these mysteries, but why should we always bring in the most mysterious new age explanation and make it more mysterious than it already is? It doesn’t add anything. Nature is as amazing and wondrous as it is. I think with all his spooky ideas he only demonstrates that he has not overcome his old way of dualistic thinking, where there has to be always some spirit moving dead matter around, spirits which he now calls fields so it sounds more like field theory in physics - instead of really embracing the idea that there is really no such thing as dead matter. And perhaps that nature and God are one.
So in the recorder v. receiver model of memory, is the hippocampus like the antenna?
Mr. Sheldrake: The Kosmyk Law of Love is quite real, fixed, infinite, and, immutable.
I cannot remember my childhood, or my adulthood up to about a few years ago. Any ideas?
Anything is possible in the Cosmos, the only "changes" that occur are observations. Nothing is constant.
What do you feed your pet unicorn ?
tgshark1 Tiger Shark tgshark1 Tiger Shark There exist constance but nothing is permenent, except God.
He says the memory does not dwell within the brain. What about when people fall on their face and suffer from memoryloss?
The memory loss caused by the head trauma is due to damage to the brain's neural pathways that formed the complex antenna which, when previously working properly, linked the feeling and thoughts of those particular lost memories to the Human Morphogenic Field collective consciousness.
The antenna is now damaged, and so the head trauma victim either has temporary or permanent inability to express those groups of feelings and/or thoughts that were serviced by the neural network (antenna) that is now damaged.
There is a science which objectively seeks truth and one which wants to get rid of God whether God exists or not. I am in favor of the former and I think that Dr. Sheldrake is also.
Kieth: you Sir, have 'hit the nail on the head' and exposed the real issues with modern science in one simple sentence.................God Be With You.
Brilliant comment
It's mind blowing stuff but feels like it could be correct;especially memory coming from our past as morphic resonance,not from a place in our brain
Brilliant!
How many ads?
Shelddrake is only expressing Theosophical and more wider "ancient wisdom" concepts that are as old as time. Nothing so new except that he is part of science now saying it.
I have been in the skateboarding industry for many years also started way back in the day snowboarding ... you see the action of his so called "morphic" fields in the ease kids are doing the hardest trips these days. All those days we put in doing a trick over and over again add to this field and the kids today by partaking in the sport then draw on this filed.
Epigenetic is good science that needs and deserves much more study and observation and deals with instincts that seem to be inherited. Morphogenesis is way harder for a scientist to conceive it ever could occur. It definitely is an amazing area to study. If it turns out there is something that allows this shared memory to occur across space and time it will be what I would call proof of supernatural.
hello . we can understand this much more easier by ourselves , because it all becomes self explanetary . some call this enlightenment but its really impersonal common sense . enjoy your journey .
Peter Jones Mark Twain said : " Common sense is not very common ". I agree with him.
Morphogenic fields are proven in nature every day. Schools of fish and flocks of birds display one mind. Maneuvers in schools of fish and birds cannot be explained in materialist terms. Which fish or bird decides the direction of the school? Which bird or fish is the leader? The answer is that there is no leader...the school is acting as one organism...they are separate but are one mind. The phenomenon of the extended mind is proven..
What you call supernatural is 100% natural. TV would have been called supernatural 500 years ago. Telepathy can be described as a biological cell phone in your head to go along with your biological speaker, microphone, camera and scent detector...
Good point if it occurs how could it be supernatural.
Still doing the rounds on the rubber crackpot circuit.
And raking in the money as he goes
Delpatrous' morphogenic field is in sync with Richard Dumb Dumb Dawkins and James the fake Randi. Your pot was cracked at birth. You live in the dark ages...
Energy emitted to be called common knowledge within conscious and unconscious of all
I super love this...
It's nice to hear this kind of theory. However, beyond his philosophical ideas, where I can find the proof of his ideas? I can't believe in something just because it sounds good
+Sge2 Qqq
Reading his books is a good place to start. The science, the experiments are all explained there.
And never, of course, believe anything just because it sounds good, or because it is accepted, or is too good to believe, or is based upon assumptions and accepted by scientists because it makes some crazy theory work (much of mainstream Big Bang Theory). Always question, study and look at all possibilities. Never trust authorities or anyone on UA-cam without your own study. And that about covers it all. It takes work.
Or, you can just save yourself time and accept what is taught in school and preached by corporate media. That's what about 50% of the population does so you'd be in good company either way.
Namaste and care,
mhikl
what about Alzheimer's how does that explain the loss of memory and focus on only certain memories in a timeline
Ah the infinite ascents of mathematics, how simple rules can build up new emergent laws that are plastic and evolvable. There is a memory field of the supra-universe, it's the cosmoqauntum supra-consciousness or the aether/akasic field/record's . Think of how much potential activities can occur in an atom, compared to the Plank length which makes the atom the the size of a galaxy compared to an atom that would be the Plank scale. That's a lot of potential organizable vacuum energy or dynamical energetic aether. There is models or theories of physics that posits simular outcomes and string theory and fuzzy space-time.
I enjoy when Dr.Rupert makes a Funny ...
Dancing Spiderman It's all funny but not funny haha.
He is like a shepherd... Outstanding in his field... a morphogenetic field. 😁😁
intent is independent of the outcome...
yup, the more you know Science the more you know the Creator.
they removed his name from wikipedia.. only the real ones will remember 😭
Listing to the 'rat example' I wonder why mice still keep falling for the same trap every damn time, for over eighty years by now ?.. .:))
Spiritual Anarchist Because they can’t beat their cheese habit
@@MrAnperm Makes sense...:)
The Symbiotic Earth by Margulis.
Successful functions of an organism
by Barry H Mansfield
Homeostasis of a living thing
a stabilizing process allowing for a successful, productive existence.
A workable functioning system
giving the best possible outcome to a living organism.
Enabling the probability of evolving to even greater level
of continued evolutionary productivity.
In other words.
A relatively stable relationship between all segments of an organism.
A human being is a living organism
and as such needs this stabilizing process.
Humanity as a whole is also a complex living organism.
Also, needing to develop its own successful functions
in order to increase the probability
of greater evolutionary possibility.
If we don’t work together there’s going to be a big problem
yes, bigger than it already is.
Still, it is my belief we can solve it,
if we try.
At least I hope so.
We still talk about Einstein; even completely uneducated people know the name. It speaks volumes that, now, our little worlds are (more than ever, and masterfully) so hypermanipulated that the breadtth of what this man has generated has not permeated all of the sciences.
Is it extravagant to think that our everyday lives, our very sociability, could/can be "warmed up" by absorbing these concepts? They are both simple and grand.
In the 70s some of us took hallucinegenics - it was a very exploring time. Now I see that ayahuasca is a "thing."
In retrospect. I think that we were and are just trying in these persuits to get to a more authentic and integrating experience of life and our place in it.
Everyone, in some fashion or other wanrs this, yet here we are, still hammered and
spoonfed by a culture whose JOB it is to keep us unsatisfied.
If your mind is going to be tweaked or should I say blown away (and it probably should be), this is a primer of the first order. Whew.. ..Ever since that parrot thing years ago....🏇
So much is not known about life on Earth. And where else will we find it except here. The complexity of life goes way beyond our scientific understanding. To think that everything can be explained in the genes gets us nowhere but in the rut of preconception.
So it is the same for people like me sto conctact the spiritual realm.. they start to be engage all over in the world
this is the future of science ....! because there is nothing to study which is not done ....! I think science must go this way to discover other things e.g dark energy or dark matter....why not?? we should discard nothing if we are searching for reality....
if we tie this morphic resonance concept into artificial intelligence, then computers (AI) will never become superior to humans unless these computers can create their own human oracles or holistic fields of habits and evolution.
Read The Evolution of Consciousness series by Endall Beall to get past all the speculation and mystical solutions for the advancement of human consciousness. I found these books on Amazon and they are amazing when it came to explaining conscious advancement.
Wait, how come math is still difficult, even when I really try?
Sebastian Lundh You most likely have a creative mind that looks at reality from different perspectives, Sebastian.
• There are many means to a creative mind, in the fields of science or from other fields of the arts. That you question means you have a spark you may be taking for granted. Science and commerce seem to garner the greater respect in our consumer world. The greatest scientist treat his/er study as an art. Even the nut, Einstein, played the violin and he was open to different and strange approaches to challenging ideas to the science of his times. Just look at his hair. For a scientist, he at least had a sense of humour. And he didn’t worry about his short comings. I believe he often went about with his fly open.
• Those who don’t question, often study day time television, but I am not condemning. There may be some creative spark ignited even from that strange exercise. I am not recommending going there, however. :-)
• Charge on and continue your studies of fields you find of interest. You may be a more visual learner. Maths stymies me too, at most times, but when I get it, there is always that little ‘aha’ moment. We tend to forget the little moments. (Check out the Electric Universe, The Thunderbolts Project, Ancient Knowledge AKA Graham Hancock. Then it may all come together.)
Namaste and care,
mhikl
Trying only works when we truly want to know something or know how to do something.
History used to be hard for me, because at that time I didn't give a shit.
Now, history is second nature because all I *want* to do is study it.
Sebastian Lundh Simply put, because morphic resonance is baloney.
+Sebastian Lundh...Because the morphogenic field isn't accessed by thought or thinking. Nor is the field accessed by 'trying'.
At 8:20 , Sheldrake says, "Now believe it or not, most cosmologists, at least in the English speaking world, are now believers in the Multiverse theory." This statement by Sheldrake is simply not true for a number of reasons. 1) In the scientific Method, there is no step called "believe in." 2) The Multiverse is hypothetical, not theoretical. (In proper scientific language.) 3) Sheldrake has set up an elaborate "Straw Man" argument. He is not arguing/debating with science, he is arguing/debating with himself. . .
Check out 'Lee Smolin' if you want to know what real modern scientists have to say about cosmology.
Science has not been deterministic since ~1890.
***** I have a degree in engineering and I did that for a living. Also I have studied a lot of science and now I give lectures in things that you would not understand. . I try to teach lawyers, judges, politicians and engineering professors the difference between the scientific method and the engineering method. This would go way over your head. . . Also, you should look up "scientific determinism." You don't seem to know what that is. .
. And I will repeat: In proper scientific language, it is not proper to say that one believes in a "Theory." .
. Sometimes when a scientist is talking down to the public, they say that they believe in a theory. That is just for the consumption of average minds. (I am mensa.)
***** Above, I mentioned the difference between Science and engineering. That was very deliberate. It is true that engineering is corrupt. As a whistle blower myself, I have been fighting that corruption for decades. I have been fighting the corruption in Nuclear Power, GMOs and Water.
. In recent years, I have been attending lectures in theoretical physics, cosmology and particle physics. These lectures are given by the real scientists who are at the leading edge of real science. I get to ask them questions, face to face. One guy is leading a group who have just finished determining that Spacetime is flat. ! ! ! (Einstein's cosmological constant has the value of 'one'.) They did this using Supernovae as standard candles to measure more precisely the distances out to the 5 to 10 billion light year distance. .
. I find no corruption in the work of these real scientists.
. Sheldrake starts by doing some real science that is interesting to me because I have been aware of these things for at least 15 years now. But then he goes of into a fantasy universe. In the chains of logic which he constructs, there is always a point where he leaves real science and goes off into his fantasy.
. NB : Top down logic is not science. .
bimmjim Listen to what he says again. You are not getting it quite right.
• He was pointing out, nay, condemning the closed mind of todays accepted science perpetrating this belief (not a science proven fact) as true. He often talks about the problem of scientists ‘accepting’ aka 'believing in’ unproven theory, (a theory that is impossible to be proved) as accepted truth. I have heard him say this before. He is condemning that kind of pseudo-thought. Listen to the accepted scientist of BBH. They talk to the uneducated (in science) as though the big bang hypothesis is proven. It is all speculation. Never do you hear them come outright to explain that it is just a theory, an hypothesis. These ’scientists' make wacky claims, such as the snowball theory of meteors as being true. They are always surprised when water, ice is not found in sufficient quantities on meteors yet they continue in this silly “belief”.
• I suspect you place too much credence in the mind of the modern scientist today. The Electric Universe is trouncing the nonsense of the pseudo science that has stalled true science for a hundred years. The end of another dark age, our dark age, is coming to an end.
• Einstein knew what folly he had unleashed upon a world in turmoil, after the horrors of WW I (a generation of youth across Europe and the Commonwealth extinguished-a generation of leaders, young men, boys, never to be) and worked to his dying moments to right his nonsense. If you are an American, WW II did not affect America (the US) as it did the nations in WW I from the beginning. Einstein’s crazy ideas offered a candle of hope to a lost world. It was all fantasy.
The Thunderbolts Project, Morphic Resonance and Graham Hancock’s Ancient Knowledge are bringing the world out of the darkness perpetrated by the wacky hypotheses of theoretical science, where scientists present their theories as accepted and ‘real’- by those benefiting from it’s lucrative infrastructure.
We live in a time when movie stars, scientists, paid and bought labourers are seen and respected as great sages. The Galileos, who got their support from curious men of independent wealth, who valued new understanding and knowledge, are few to be found in our commercial world. Big Pharma, Big Corporations now own and manipulate science. (The Climate Warming/Change? consortium is the latest entry into pseudo, manipulated science.) The Government and most universities have given up on the independence of science. And we are now just coming out of a dark age as dehumanising as the time of burning unaccepted new thinkers at the stake.
Namaste and care,
mhikl
***** I just got 48 right out of 50 , on this test.
www.csmonitor.com/Science/2011/1209/Are-you-scientifically-literate-Take-our-quiz/Composing-about-78-percent-of-the-air-at-sea-level-what-is-the-most-common-gas-in-the-Earth-s-atmosphere
+BLAGASPANTS
Thanks, Blag, you are a kindred spirit I sense.
• I have little formal study in science but that doesn’t stop me from looking at all sides with an earnest interest in what the purpose of all things be.
• Know-alls and braggarts I have little time for (pardon the grammar); but my dad was a true thinker and taught me to question everything, especially my own dearly held beliefs. Sounds like you do the same and that makes for more joy in study and understanding than those professing great knowledge could ever experience.
Namaste and care, enjoy the challenge, Blaggapants
mhikl
no-one has refuted halton arp.he went on the bbc with patrick moore.how are people still talking about big bang bollocks?especially sheldrake.didnt fred hoyle invent the term big bang for a laugh?
Bruce Lipton biology of belief.
Precisely
Imagine if we can disrupt the resonance between our species, secretly we would destroy one whole species by making us more and more stupid.
It seems to link to dark matter and dark energy. I wish I could have a good long conversation with him.