Rupert Sheldrake - Morphic Resonance

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 чер 2019
  • Morphic Resonance: The Nature of Formative Causation by Rupert Sheldrake: amzn.to/2k59vC7
    The Presence of the Past: Morphic Resonance and the Memory of Nature by Rupert Sheldrake: amzn.to/2ltHhRO
    Science Set Free: 10 Paths to New Discovery by Rupert Sheldrake: amzn.to/2lBnlN1
    Science and Spiritual Practices: Transformative Experiences and Their Effects on Our Bodies, Brains, and Health by Rupert Sheldrake: amzn.to/2lr9bxN
    The Science Delusion: Freeing the Spirit of Enquiry by Rupert Sheldrake: amzn.to/2lDtJU3

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @muleteammate
    @muleteammate 4 роки тому +27

    What Rupert says about crystals is true. I am a PhD organic chemist with a background in organic synthesis, worked at Merck in Rahway, NJ in a synthesis lab. The head of scale-up chemistry, Dr. P. Ryder, tells the same story. A compound was crystallized, studied, and patented. Later when a new crystalline form came into being, the original crystalline form in the patent would never form again, not in any of our labs around the world. This, of course, provided a challenge to our patent by other companies who wanted to break Merck's patent. We, as chemists, could not explain the phenomenon, still can't. We had hypotheses that the newer crystalline form was at lower energy, but why we could never make the original crystalline form is still a mystery.

  • @gavinforchrist7322
    @gavinforchrist7322 3 роки тому +13

    One of the things that blew my mind was the fact that the Monarch butterflies that fly north are not the same ones that fly south again. So how do they know the way?

  • @senchamacrae50
    @senchamacrae50 4 роки тому +28

    Love this guy. So does my dog.

  • @farmerfriend4629
    @farmerfriend4629 4 роки тому +15

    I recently read a book by Eileen Day Mckusick. She does biofield tuning. She has found that our aura has our stored memories like the tree rings. She also talks about ancestral energy storage of the body. Putting your information and hers together is intriguing. She also comments how one person's energy/memory shift affect a person's energy stuckness of a family. So seeing the transference of information thru electromagnet field is fascinating.

  • @0ptimal
    @0ptimal 3 роки тому +8

    Reminds me of sand on a plate on a speaker. When a frequency is being emitted and a pattern is formed, you can disturb the sand but it will go back to form as long as the frequency (and enough sand)is there.

  • @mindseyeview7411
    @mindseyeview7411 Рік тому

    MR seems like a natural evolution in response to having to take the bloody time in writing stuff to each other

  • @RSEFX
    @RSEFX 4 роки тому +11

    Although Rupert more or less discounts the Platonic values (woven into the essential fabric of the universe) I'd like to see a meeting of the minds between Rupert Sheldrake, Stuart Hamerof and Roger Penrose to see to what extent, if any, morphic resonance may, well, resonate with the Orch OR/Hamerof-Penrose theory. I suspect there are some areas of overlap.

  • @jamesmusker6454
    @jamesmusker6454 4 роки тому +16

    Amazingly interesting subject from a true genius - thank you Rupert Sheldrake.

  • @aqua3461
    @aqua3461 3 роки тому +5

    I have been following Rupert Sheldrake´s fascinating and convincing ideas for many years and I find it frustrating how long so-called science takes in order to adopt his thoughts. Of course, human nature and egoistic interests, such as the wish to keep up a reputation as a "serious academic", can partially be blamed for this neglect. But it seems that the age of true curiosity to understand the world and the cosmos in more depth has been sacrificed for money and fame. Perhaps the dark ages have never really been overcome?

  • @yacovmitchenko1490
    @yacovmitchenko1490 3 роки тому +4

    I recall Rupert once mentioning his son, who wanted to apply the morphic resonance hypothesis when writing an exam. His son figured that if he begins with the last questions, he'd be able to answer some of the early questions more easily, in light of morphic resonance. Assuming this holds water, though, I wonder whether or not morphic resonance would necessarily mean getting the answers right. I'm guessing "No". It's conceivable one may tap into collective stupidity (or carelessness). The fact that they all got As, of course, may be coincidental - or not. Other factors may have been involved (such as intelligence and hard study).

  • @Tunnelmental
    @Tunnelmental Рік тому +1

    Without doubt from me, Rupert is the most brilliant scientist of our time. This lecture is fascinating, in a true sense.

  • @NatureGirl
    @NatureGirl 2 роки тому +2

    Gregg Braden speaks about memory being held in the heart which contain sensory neurites that perform the same function as neurons in the brain which think, feel and remember independently of the brain.

  • @samirsatpathy
    @samirsatpathy 2 роки тому +1

    It has begun sir!

  • @SatyrBarbarossa_Eleusis
    @SatyrBarbarossa_Eleusis 9 годин тому

    Blasphemy! Heresy! Outrageous! Fantastic!

  • @neelaskitchen1117
    @neelaskitchen1117 3 роки тому +4

    267 like +🔔👍

  • @JohnDoe-bm5lp
    @JohnDoe-bm5lp 3 роки тому +6

    very interesting lecture, never heard of this man before

  • @tiffanypage9077
    @tiffanypage9077 3 роки тому +3

    Hello you are very astute thank you for invaluable dialogue

  • @yacovmitchenko1490
    @yacovmitchenko1490 3 роки тому +4

    So I'm guessing that the question of collective memory and intelligence is framed by Rupert in terms of "habit" and "creativity. It seems that creativity then bypasses/transcends morphic resonance. At any rate, I enjoyed this talk immensely. Much of what he says harmonizes with (or calls to mind) ancient Hindu beliefs.

  • @AlanSitar
    @AlanSitar 4 роки тому +4

    Amazing!

  • @RasberrySkittle
    @RasberrySkittle 4 роки тому +3

    About nature having a memory and the theory that the laws of physics stays the same thanks to it - Our memory is dependent on the laws of nature. What says energy should move in our brain as it does? The laws of nature does. Certain neural pathways has been strenghtened and energy has the habit of flowing through there, like intentations in brainmatter formed through experience. This constitutes memory. Sheldrake says that the laws of nature is a habit just like our memory - pathways formed by experience - is a habit. But what is the habits of nature an intentation into? and what laws govern how this more basic substance operate? This should be a habit too, otherwise we have just added an extra step, but this leads us to an infinite regress. If nothing in the universe is fixed, not even the laws of nature, then what makes anything the way it is? We explain all habits of life and objects we observe by using the laws of nature as the most fundamental axiom. If they also fluctuate, what causes them to?