I AM that I AM
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2022
- Moses asked God, "Whom shall I tell the Children of Israel sent me?" God replied " Tell them that I AM (EHYEH) sent me"... but what does this mean? What significance did "EHYEH" have for the children of Israel in determining who sent Moses?
This is powerful. Thank you brother.
This is one of my absolute favorites. And believe it or not it is only scratching the service.
Happy to have come across your YT channel! Recently, through a close friend of mine, I have been introduced to more eye-opening biblical truths.
My studying on our Elohim's original Hebrew language, and our Father's TRUE name (s), plus the truth about WHO WE ARE has been really life-changing. Continuing to learn! Bless you and much success!
Von.
Good man, keep it up.
I love this so much. Thank you brother 😁🙌🏾🙏🏾
Thank you for a profound teaching on the name. Mazzal Tov-All the best !
My absolute pleasure! Thank you for taking the time to watch and engage.
I love your presence thank you keep it up
Awww! You are too kind! Thank you so much!
Wanted to thank you again!
Where do you get aleph heh yod heh? Isn't it yod heh vav heh?
Hey Brother,
Thank you so much for this this really helped a lot. I made a comment on one of your other vids and you recommended to watch this one and I’m glad I did. I had just 2 more questions.
This video helped settle the understanding of I am that I am ehyeh Asher ehyeh or as the Hebrew Israelites say Ahayah Asher Ahayah ( I guess paleo Hebrew/ Phoenician script using vowels sounds only ). They attack the transliteration of Jesus as the name of the son however and I wasn’t wondering your take on that. They use the name Yashaya or Yashayah (meaning my savior) They say that Christs birth name wouldn’t have been Yehoshua/Joshua or Yeshua/Jeshua. When I researched it out the transliteration of their rendition is Ishi or Jishi. Is their any validity to that or is it all hogwash?
Blessings! Thank you so much. I am glad that you watched and considered both videos. The Hebrew Aleph-Bet, consisted only of consonants, which were written using 22 letters. This Aleph-Bet, known as “Proto-Sinaitic” which evolved later into the "Paleo-Hebrew" script, was used from around the 10th century BC until the 5th century BC. And still was still in use in Aramaic in the 1st Century AD.
Vowels were added to the Hebrew Aleph-Bet much later, beginning in the 7th or 8th century AD. The system of vowel pointing, known as "nikkud," uses diacritical marks placed above or below the consonantal letters to indicate the vowels. The addition of vowels made it easier to read and understand the Hebrew language. But again this DID NOT exist prior to “800 AD.”
So, to answer your question concerning the validity of their claims, in the most tender manner, there is no evidence to support any claims that יָשַׁע spelled Yod, Shin, Ayin, (*YShA) would have been pronounced "Yahasha,” which does not appear in the traditional Hebrew Bible or in Jewish literature, so it is not a name with a clear meaning or significance at least from the Jewish perspective.
Now, same thing with Jesus’ name in Hebrew is יֵשׁוּעַ (Yeshua), which means "salvation" or "deliverance." This name is derived from the same root word as the Hebrew word for "salvation" (ישועה, yeshu'ah) and is closely related to the name Joshua (יְהוֹשֻׁעַ, Yehoshua). If you look closely each of these has different spellings:
יֵשׁוּעַ (Yeshua) *YShWA
ישועה (yeshu'ah) *YShWAH
יְהוֹשֻׁעַ (Yehoshua) *YHWShA
(* = consonants only/ no vowels)
In each case there is either no ה (Hey) or a shift in its positioning within the term, which expresses a different meaning for each word.
Yehoshua (יְהוֹשֻׁעַ) and Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ) and are the Hebrew names of Jesus, and both mean "salvation" or "deliverance,” emphasizing the idea that Jesus is the one who brings salvation. Hence a “savior” or “deliverer.” Yeshu’ah (יְשׁוּעָה), on the other hand, is a Hebrew word that means "salvation" or "deliverance" in a general sense. It is used throughout the Hebrew Bible to describe God's saving acts on behalf of His people. For example, the Israelites' deliverance from slavery in Egypt is called the "salvation" (יְשׁוּעָה) of the Lord.
Ishi (אִישִׁי) is a completely different word spelled Aleph, Yod, Shin, Yod. This word means my husband" or "my man" and is often used as a term of endearment in the Hebrew language. Ishi (אִישִׁי) and Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ) are very different words with different meanings:
אִישִׁי (Ishi) *AYShY
יֵשׁוּעַ (Yeshua) *YShWA
In any case any attempt to add vowels or vowels sounds to any Hebrew word written before 800 AD are just constructs. No one knows exactly how these words were pronounced.
@@gclmedia wow I totally understand everything and that makes so much sense.
I guess the way they spell Ishi is from Strong’s H3467(yod, ayin, shin, yod), not my husband, but the first name found in first 1 chronicles 2:31 for example.
Overall I’m seeing wow this is sad because many are being led astray into heretical teachings with all these things. Ugh I just pray for these brothers and sisters. Hopefully I can ask one last point and I’ll be done?
"Yish‛ı̂y" (יִשְׁעִי) versus "Yeshua" (יֵשׁוּעַ) While both names share what seems to be a similar meaning and are derived from the same Hebrew root word "yasha" (יָשַׁע), "Yish‛ı̂y" is not directly related to "Yeshua".
Yish‛ı̂y (יִשְׁעִי) *YShAY
Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ) *YShWA
Yasha (יָשַׁע) *YShA
(* = consonants only/ no vowels)
"Yish‛ı̂y" is a distinct Hebrew name found in the Old Testament, while "Yeshua" is the name that was used specifically to refer to Jesus in the New Testament. However, both names do share the same theological concept of salvation or deliverance. But, these two names present two completely different perspectives of “salvation.” The name "Yish‛ı̂y" can be interpreted as "my hand holds onto salvation" (my hand/works). Whereas Jesus "Yeshua" can be interpreted as "salvation through connection"(His hand/works. This is key! If His name was Yish‛ı̂y" (יִשְׁעִי) it could be contrary to the scriptures. Because the Bible tells us through the Apostle Paul, that, “For by grace are ye saved through faith (His work Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ)); and that not of yourselves (My work Yish‛ı̂y (יִשְׁעִי)): it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9, KJV). This verse, down to the letter, are the ideas expressed in the names "Yish‛ı̂y" (יִשְׁעִי) versus "Yeshua" (יֵשׁוּעַ).
@@gclmedia woah that makes an incredible amount of sense. His very name points back to HIM. Because it’s always has been and will be about him and his work and what he has done for our salvation and not us. Just as Jesus always points to the father, as we call upon his name we also point to Jesus (the son).
My last question concerning what I was told from GOCC the Hebrew Israelite group is that the Holy Spirit is not a He but a she.
They argue 1. In Genesis 2 it says let us make man in our image, male and female made he them. So they’re saying that within humanity there is a reflection of what is there within the Godhead. A man (male spirit figure) and a woman (feminine spirit figure) makes a child (a son). So they argue Father is the source that created the feminine spirit which is the Holy Spirit, that forms the son or the word who is Jesus. To further that they state 2. The book of Proverbs and apocryphal books words of Solomon and Ecclesiasticus speak of wisdom as a she. Lady wisdom. Proverbs chapter 8:22-23 for example. Seems this wisdom was there at the beginning and was used to establish the earth. They cross reference that with Genesis 1:2 the spirit hovering over the waters. They say it can’t just be a literary device used by Solomon like anthropomorphism but that in fact there a true person speaking there. Lastly point 3. They argue that in the New Testament the word used for spirit or ruach is feminine. They say consider the term comforter, a helper, an advocate, it breaths a feminine quality like a sister, mother, aunt, grandmother that speaks wisdom with a gentle care or quality to it. They also argue consider Jesus strong rebuke of speaking against or blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Or that the Holy Spirit can be grieved as though there were a fragility to it’s nature. And lastly the spirit coming as a dove even upon Jesus. All should be signs pointing to a female gender not male. So the conspiracy is that the early translations were either mistranslated in the greek or deliberately concealed.
This has caused a lot of trouble and grief because I can’t understand or see how it’s wrong. Seems to make sense. if there’s male and female energy/gender should it not be the case in the spirit? Not sure though because I’ve always used Father Son and Holy Spirit (male) my whole life. Ugh praying you can she’s light please!
@@gclmedia sorry just receiving this. Hopefully you’ll be available. Thank you so much sir I really appreciate it.
Where did you do most of your studying?
Blessings, my seminary studies began at Norfolk Theological Seminary. From there I went to Mary Baldwin University to Liberty University and now Columbia International University. Even throughout all of that Hebrew is not taught this way in most secular schools. It wasn’t until I studied abroad that I encountered this level of Hebrew teachings and understandings.
Actually. Ayah Ashar Ayah
Paleo Hebrew reads…” I WILL BE WHOM I WILL BE! LOOK IT UP!
I thought something similar to this
Read Isaiah7.14 for Messiah name
If you're referring to Emanu El, it is two words in the Hebrew. They called the child El (GOD) and stated He was Emanu (with us). See original Hebrew. GOD bless!
To equate Jesus with his Father is a speculation. Nowhere in the Bible Jesus categorically said he is God, but a loving servant/servitor, emissary of God.
Jesus absolutely claimed he was God. Educate yourself
ua-cam.com/video/gw9YeMyxe5k/v-deo.htmlsi=5PMgPFFEu6u_M5-w
"Before Abraham, I am"
Before bed pray and ask God please reveal your son to me.
@@t.bo.a7061please reveal "YOUR SON" to me. Isn't that two persons? The Father and the son?
@@neomagnon he's 3 father son and holy spirit. I understand if it's hard to comprehend we are talking about the highest of high dimensional beings