Why modern family cars are not as good as they used to be.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • As automobiles become more generic do car classifications still hold any meaning? Even the most basic ones?

КОМЕНТАРІ • 81

  • @petertornabeni602
    @petertornabeni602 7 місяців тому +7

    Always PACKED with details and you don’t disappoint. Thank you. Another please..

  • @kennethswain6313
    @kennethswain6313 7 місяців тому +4

    Great comparison I didn’t know they were still making the Malibu I want a family car not a truck

  • @BELCAN57
    @BELCAN57 7 місяців тому +3

    We have a Subaru Outback. I still consider it as a small Station Wagon.

  • @jeffking4176
    @jeffking4176 7 місяців тому +2

    Another excellent video.
    Since it was always just Mom and myself, didn’t have to worry about “family “.
    Mom had a 1964 Chevy Malibu SS Convertible for many years.
    ONE POINT: cars from 60 years ago only lasted [ generally], 100,000 miles. Tho Odometer would roll over at 99,999. It was the Japanese cars that added the extra number to the odometer, because y those cars were lasting twice as long.
    🚗🙂

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому +1

      60 years ago, there was no such thing as synthetic motor oil either. And Volvo was the first one to add the extra digit, not the Japanese.

  • @trudygreer2491
    @trudygreer2491 7 місяців тому +1

    60 years ago (and one week), speaking of fine family cars, the Buick Sport Wagon and Oldsmobile Vista-Cruiser were introduced!

  • @chrisjeffries2322
    @chrisjeffries2322 7 місяців тому +4

    Right on. I have 22 Mazda CX5 and my late Morthes 65 4-door Malibu Wagon, I always use the wagon if I move things as there is so much more space! 🚙

    • @thehopelesscarguy
      @thehopelesscarguy  7 місяців тому +1

      I bet.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому +1

      I would ditch the Japanese car and just use the Malibu. You don't have to get the Malibu smog checked, right?

    • @chrisjeffries2322
      @chrisjeffries2322 7 місяців тому +1

      @@jamesbosworth4191 Correct, in California smog inspections only go back to the 1976 model year for smog. As for everyday driving, I use the Mazda. The 65 although has disc brakes is still a 59-year-old car that is not as tight.

  • @jamesbosworth4191
    @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому +1

    The reasons are 1) CAFE, 2) They are all in the Japanoid idiom, and Japanese cars are made mainly for commuting and running errands. Traditional American cars were first and foremost designed for Pleasure Cruising. That meant at least adequate interior room, quietness relative to their price class, and a nice smooth ride. Japanese cars are too small and too cramped to be good Pleasure Cruisers, and they ride way too rough and suffer from severe road noise, neither of which is pleasant. They are designed for lowest cost motoring, just like a Model T. 3) "Family" to us Americans includes the Grandparents, cousins, etc. "Family" to the designers of Japanese cars is just Mom and Dad, and 2 little kids in the tiny back seat. Those are the big reasons family cars are not as good as they used to be.

  • @paulcheek5711
    @paulcheek5711 7 місяців тому +1

    forget SUVs Bring back BIG sedans...

  • @ericbishop3468
    @ericbishop3468 7 місяців тому +1

    Modern cars are safer and more fuel efficient. That's where the attraction ends.

  • @mikedrown2721
    @mikedrown2721 7 місяців тому +1

    It did have tilt......sunvisors and seats

  • @bryantint1339
    @bryantint1339 7 місяців тому +1

    The last decent midsized Chevrolet was the 2005 Chevrolet Classic. Should swap out the 4 cylinder and get a Chevrolet 3.9L V6.

  • @philiprussell3338
    @philiprussell3338 7 місяців тому +1

    Well argued points of view.

  • @ScottALaFollette
    @ScottALaFollette 7 місяців тому +1

    You make some excellent points. 🤔💭🎯

  • @CJColvin
    @CJColvin 7 місяців тому +2

    The only decent Modern Sedans that are worth buying is the Dodge Charger and the Chrysler 300 while any other modern sedan is only for midget people and not big guys like me and alot of these modern Sedans (nor modern vehicles ingeneral) aren't as robust or bulletproof as the legendary 4.6L SOHC 2V Modular V8 in the Ford Panther Platform (Ford Crownvic, Mercury Grand Marquis, and Lincoln Town Car).

  • @mortimersnerd9991
    @mortimersnerd9991 7 місяців тому

    If the modern family sedan was modeled after the modern family, it would be a modular multi-deck mini-van with optional, detachable outriggers and multiple side-cars. This would accommodate the lack of commitment to a family unit with half-step people and semi-half-cousins in the same household.
    I’d like to say that the design of family vehicles is defined by averaging that which doesn’t annoy people without being too exciting with what is most profitable. But the bottom line is you can’t really define a modern family sedan without defining what a modern family is.
    Its no wonder the modern family vehicle is an amorphous blob on wheels. An amorphous blob is what the family unit is.
    The most confused of all vehicle consumers are pickup drivers that never have anything bulkier than their ego to move. Ego is at the root of it. You could say it destroyed the family sedan, when in-fact it destroyed the family.
    This is why having a family car with too big of a motor worked. It accommodated the family and the occasional ego issue.

  • @milfordcivic6755
    @milfordcivic6755 7 місяців тому +1

    Ugh. Car culture is dead

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      Not to those of us who still drive traditional American cars it isn't.

  • @Primus54
    @Primus54 7 місяців тому +2

    Interesting subject well made and presented, HCG. 👍👍👍

  • @paulcheek5711
    @paulcheek5711 7 місяців тому

    todays little plastic toy cars are ugly, not as big and uncomfortable .

  • @kmyre
    @kmyre 7 місяців тому +1

    How about modern station wagons? They tick all the boxes - comfort, economy, performance, space, safety.

    • @tdvandy2
      @tdvandy2 7 місяців тому

      Who builds one that is reasonably priced? No one, because they don't sell at all.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      Mercedes and BMW wagons are just too expensive for most folks.

    • @kmyre
      @kmyre 7 місяців тому

      VW Passat, Mazda 6, Chavy Malibu come to mind in a reasonable price range

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      @@kmyre Too small.

    • @thehopelesscarguy
      @thehopelesscarguy  7 місяців тому +2

      I can't think of a modern wagon with more than 5 passenger seating or significant cargo space or towing capacity.

  • @bryantint1339
    @bryantint1339 7 місяців тому

    My 2013 Chevrolet Impala does fine, except towing. Suspension is a bit too soft for towing.

  • @OLDS98
    @OLDS98 7 місяців тому +1

    Excellent presentation and you are telling the tuth. Well stated. I liked how you talked about how the needs of buyers versus the reality of the situation. Well stated again I must say.

  • @THROTTLEPOWER
    @THROTTLEPOWER 7 місяців тому

    Great vid!!!! 🤜🤛

  • @glennso47
    @glennso47 7 місяців тому +4

    60 years ago there were no electric cars.

    • @BELCAN57
      @BELCAN57 7 місяців тому +5

      But over100 years ago there were.

    • @thehopelesscarguy
      @thehopelesscarguy  7 місяців тому +1

      Well, actually there were, but certainly not in the mainstream.

    • @jeffking4176
      @jeffking4176 7 місяців тому +1

      There were a few.
      🚗🙂

    • @davidgold5961
      @davidgold5961 7 місяців тому +3

      True, but, 120 years ago there were electric cars.

  • @ralphabreu5022
    @ralphabreu5022 7 місяців тому +1

    Car's today SUCK
    The new Malibu is an Opel in Germany.
    The Malibu of 50 years was way better.......
    I take a Malibu of 50 years ago than today's piece of shit GDI engine
    I have an 11 Malibu that gunked engine that always serviced my mechanic cannot clean the carbon on the engine.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      And with today's synthetic motor oil, it will probably outlast one of today's rolling computers.

    • @ralphabreu5022
      @ralphabreu5022 7 місяців тому

      @@jamesbosworth4191
      But today's additives in gas is what's killing today's car's with GDI injection engines

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      @@ralphabreu5022 What is GDI? I don't have a modern car, so I don't know what many of these abbreviations mean.

    • @ralphabreu5022
      @ralphabreu5022 7 місяців тому +1

      @@jamesbosworth4191
      Instead of having conventional fuel injection rail.
      GDI is Gasoline Direct Injection. Throughout time they get dirty and caked with carbon.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      @@ralphabreu5022 How do diesels get away with it?

  • @dr.elvis.h.christ
    @dr.elvis.h.christ 7 місяців тому

    Modern families aren't as good as they used to be.

  • @barryburkholder4000
    @barryburkholder4000 7 місяців тому +2

    Only boomers can remember those old cars. The days of lots of color options for outside and inside. Not just black silver gray white and red. All will black or tan interior chosen by the maker based on exterior color.

    • @thehopelesscarguy
      @thehopelesscarguy  7 місяців тому

      Plum Crazy.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      That's because you guys refuse to buy anything but Japanese, and if you can afford it, German. Buy a low-mileage full-size car from the 70s. If it is a 74 or earlier, it will not be subject to smog checks and will not have a catalytic converter. That means you can swap out the automatic that it probably has for a manual transmission for more fun. Just remember that you will also have to change the rear end, as you can not pull super-tall gears with a manual trans.

  • @denislandry7577
    @denislandry7577 7 місяців тому +1

    Well done

  • @robmclaughjr
    @robmclaughjr 7 місяців тому

    Station wagons got their name from how they were thought similar to the existing train station horse wagons meant to pick up and drop off passengers and their luggage at the train station. So it wasn't designed to be a family car either. "Family car" is a subjective term.

    • @thehopelesscarguy
      @thehopelesscarguy  7 місяців тому +2

      Body style names are a thing of their own that have really gone off the rails with things like "4 door coupes".

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      Originally, that was true, but families discovered how family-friendly they were.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      @@thehopelesscarguy That is just like "salty sugar" or "dry water".

    • @trudygreer2491
      @trudygreer2491 7 місяців тому

      ​@@jamesbosworth4191Yes.. now tell that to Mercedes..

  • @glennso47
    @glennso47 7 місяців тому

    What is the difference between a station wagon and an suv?

    • @prestonstephens7719
      @prestonstephens7719 7 місяців тому +2

      When you boil all the fat out of it… it’s CAFE Regulations. That’s why you don’t see any station wagons anymore.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      Most station wagons were based on a passenger car, SUVs are based on a pickup truck.

  • @orbscorbs
    @orbscorbs 7 місяців тому +2

    I read it on another site: today we don't drive cars, we drive toasters.

    • @thehopelesscarguy
      @thehopelesscarguy  7 місяців тому

      That would explain much of the styling.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      They are not cars, they are rolling computers. One of the reasons I refuse to buy a modern car.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 7 місяців тому

      @@thehopelesscarguy They are not styled at all, they are designed to look just like everything else.