I imagine it to be like a self precessing rotation. It also seems to fit nicely with Pauli exclusion, 4d space time, sine and cos relation to radii, QM, interference, even string theory's fundamental lenght as a single rotation with no 'self interference'. but that also denies freedoms giving existence to an observer. Rotations of an 11d spinor? It makes more sense without length IMO. I am not saying this is how it is.. IDK, just seems one could make it fit that way.
I am still stuck on the atomism; Not falsified in 2.5k yrs. It's a cosmology that's elegant enough IMO. A personal 'crackpot' hypothesis follows. If the universe is a singular point, then how can it have dimension? The difference between stuff around us, and what's on the other side of the universe is initial vectors in the big bang. so why add to that? keep rotations, no need for length. ie, length is rotation.
nice camera work.... 42:10
I imagine it to be like a self precessing rotation.
It also seems to fit nicely with Pauli exclusion, 4d space time, sine and cos relation to radii, QM, interference, even string theory's fundamental lenght as a single rotation with no 'self interference'. but that also denies freedoms giving existence to an observer.
Rotations of an 11d spinor?
It makes more sense without length IMO.
I am not saying this is how it is.. IDK, just seems one could make it fit that way.
Anyone know who did the painting in the background? The one with the fingers interlocked?
I am still stuck on the atomism; Not falsified in 2.5k yrs.
It's a cosmology that's elegant enough IMO.
A personal 'crackpot' hypothesis follows.
If the universe is a singular point, then how can it have dimension?
The difference between stuff around us, and what's on the other side of the universe is initial vectors in the big bang.
so why add to that? keep rotations, no need for length. ie, length is rotation.