I find your interface much cleaner than hers, it feeds into the holistic ASMR experience you are famous for. I was never conscious about it until I clicked her highlight video, which goes back and forth between both screens, making me realize how much more I like your setup.
More colabs with Anna. Either she is a very good actor or she has a very good soul. Quesiton: Is it a victory or a loss when we don't get to hear 'oh no my queen!"?
I love how we can't tell what Anna is saying, but when she makes a really good move we can see it on her face. And then Eric starts squirming, it's so great.
For future reference, the reverse Englund Gambit trap attempt would have failed miserably if Anna had spotted dxc2. Sure, white wins the queen with Bxf7+ followed by Qxd8, but since Rosen began the game with no rook on a1, black captures the b1 knight and promotes... Yikes
Hey I don't know if you read these Eric but with the lockdown here in the UK I've been having dinner by myself a lot and this one video has literally kept me company for a week. You're the man.
@@derrickwayne4627 I feel like knowing that your opponent has made a really good move doesn’t stack the odds in your favor in the worst case it would just pressurize you even further. What I meant to say is that you’ll only know you made a good move or didn’t fuck up only after your turn is over. If you are referring to a bar that can show you the outcome of different moves available before committing only then it’ll be useful. But that definitely is cheating. I don’t know why people comment before thinking, it’s only there because it doesn’t help. If it were to help it’d be considered external help, hence cheating. Obv we’re talking about a higher level vs lower level player game.
Better? With piece up? Maybe I just overstated her thinking she is "just" terrible while you need to seek for some very flavourish adjectives. That indeed may be the case.
@@hthought But just imagine... Would you score below 50% against sb with 125% of your rating (1600 vs 2000 for example) being piece up and having time odds? I know you can't exactly scale that way, but just for instructional purposes. It's abysmal score.
@@hthought Highly doubt it. Normally with only times odds you score on avg. much below, but with piece up and time odds it's not the case anymore. She should be crushing him in most games. 400 elo is also way less difference than you think. It's large gap, but you can overtake it, while here we are talking about massive odds. It's mostly about attitude because just as Judith Polgar said chess is about 40% psychology.
In old games we don't try to challenge in the center of the board. We always try to infiltrate pieces stuck by pawns. We go all the way across the board.
@EricRosen Please explain the position at 3:44:04 In this position if black just takes the pawn on c2, you may end up with Bxf7+, Kxf7, then queen takes queen, that's true, but the pawn will take the knight on b2=Q and the queen is reborn. You will probably take black's light-square Bishop then, and black just goes Queen (the re-born one) to e4 and defends the b7 pawn and you will probably be in trouble. I believe the trap works in normal positions but in this specific one, as you've got no rook on a1, you will end up with a losing position. Am I missing something?
It's true the trap doesn't work exactly the same, as the queen is reborn. It does still win a pawn and pins the opponents b8 knight so I think it would be favourable.
At 33:10 could you anyone tell me why F5 was such a game changer? Couldn't white still play Bf6 or Bh6 and carry on with the plan Eric was explaining previously? I can't see the vital difference F5 makes by black that prevents that plan.
It frees up a defensive square for the rook so that Rf7 becomes a possibility. And if Qg3 then Qd7. If further castles followed by R1g2 and Rdg1 then simply Rc8 followed by Rc7. Sure, White exerts some pressure on the g7 pawn, but ultimately has little attacking potential. His only hope in the game becomes pushing the h-pawn, but I think that's just too slow, as it gives Black time to hide the king on f8 and eventually transfer him over to the centre of the board (to a square like d7), for example, where he will be hugged by a swarm of friendly pieces. Granted, Bf6 would still probably have been White's best try because it was the only attempt at formulating some sort of attack by White, and because of the threat of what was actually played in the game, but it was still far too easy to defend against. Eric likely wanted to be tricky and come up with a continuation in which Anna was more likely to blunder. EDIT: Just checked with the engine. Bf6 and bh6 are indeed White's only options besides castling queenside.
F5 is strong because it prevents white from winning material while shutting down the attack So erics idea of f6 bxf6 rxf6 qxf6 the material and position is even maybe even slightly better for white. now a more realistic line would be f6 bxf6 rf7 where white would have 2 pawns for a knight blacks still better (engine gives 1.7) but attacking opportunities. Now that same idea after f5 doesn't really do anything F5 bf6 rf7 qh6 qd7 white has no attack blacks up a knight the center will be opening (engine gives black 4.7)
@@mattr791 @Max Khovanski Thank you both very much for the clear explanations they really helped me understand the position better as I didnt understand what was going on very well.
1:24:38 I don't understand why Anna played that move. She could have at least taken the rook. It put your knight one turn further from her king's current position, but I doubt that is worth letting you keep your rook. What do you think her idea was? Just a blunder? Or an actual strategy that I'm unable to see? I rewatched this match to see how you caught back up from so far behind, and so I'm very curious why Anna did that.
Because after he took i think she would play knight g4 check and that attacks the bishop with the queen, meaning shes up a pawn and since he’s already down material he didnt want to trade. (Thats what i saw at least maybe theres a mate or bigger trap lol idk)
JOOO three hours of the prettiest chess streamer + Anna Cramling? Amazing! 😍
Omg he's so kawaii 😍😍
we have been blessed
Had me in the first half ngl
i smell gay
kappa
Anna: "He is thinking so long, he must see something I can't see"
Eric: "Hihi, thats a pawn-tipi"
Time stamp pls?
31:54
@@schwartz_a1564 thanks
🤣
@@schwartz_a1564 piou
19:50 "Ok now I'm slightly more terrified", slowly sips tea.
Calmest vs most energetic chess streamer battle
Perfectly balanced as all things should be.
-Reanu Keeves
andrea botez:otherwise
@@varunrao754 she's not energetic, just annoying
@@evoskaelthas814 the god of skyrim with his Yorkshire tea
@@mehmetaskar1356 Don't be rude, Mr. Askar. You have every right to be annoyed at Andrea, but no one really gains anything from you sharing it.
Actually to be down a minor piece is something nice for Eric. He was going to sack it for a FUNNY LINE anyways.
Underrated comment
not really, hard to gambit when you start out with a lost piece, nothing to make the funny line with lol
@@travisclark7286 The line is even funnier with two sacked pieces!
zuldomann
don't have a timestamp but somewhere in the first half, Eric, totally deadpan calm: "I need to calm down" 😂
45:57 ?
if he gets any calmer he would move backwards
@@Zamibia😂😂
28:50
“Do you even rook lift, bro?”
“I’m about to... bro...”
Timestamp please 🥺
28:50 got it😂
"I'm about to...bro..."
3:20:49
@@Fergus316 good catch, fixed
I’m still waiting for Anna’s channel to blow up. All the lessons with Pia have helped me a lot. Great video Eric!
Wow, such a cute and beautiful chess player! Anna is not ugly either
Anna is not ugly either 😂. Yes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder
2:44:03 "I bought like a toaster. It's super simple, you put bread in and it turns it into toast."
That's what toasters do, Eric
I find your interface much cleaner than hers, it feeds into the holistic ASMR experience you are famous for. I was never conscious about it until I clicked her highlight video, which goes back and forth between both screens, making me realize how much more I like your setup.
Lmao, I just noticed that Eric says "wait a minute" a LOT when he's low on time, we don't have that minute man xD
"Beat her cheeks"
"Oh that sounds cheeky" 😂😂😂
Comment I was looking for
Bro when “beat her cheeks” came through as a donation I died
When?
@8:22
beat. her. cheeks.
There is not enough Rosen, 4 hours is close but still not enough
Watch the 12 hour blitz marathon :)
@@watchableraven3517 I was gonna say the same haha
@@watchableraven3517 + the new 7 hour vid tho I'm sad his sleep schedule is so messed up
I don't know why I thought you were referring to violin rosin
Wow 4 hours of Eric. Am I in heaven?
Congratulations for making it there.
😇
@@eric-rosen Opponent: *plays stafford gambit
Eric: *nuts
It was heaven if he did 4 hour bullet marathon
@@Anonymoususa456 Kowalski analyze the nut
More colabs with Anna. Either she is a very good actor or she has a very good soul. Quesiton: Is it a victory or a loss when we don't get to hear 'oh no my queen!"?
Definetly a loss :(
Win for the mind, loss for the heart
A very good actor
She has a nice girl, you should see the lessons with her mom very instructive
Her soul seems really delicious, what a treat!
Looks, brains, and charisma.
Anna isn't bad either.
Thanks for uploading longer videos again! I could imagine some of us would also really enjoy watching some (Long) tournaments again :)
14:23 so synchronised movement
Soulmates?!??!?!?!!!?
@@lukajavaxishvili1084 chill
people who can read lips are getting 2x the content.
Read teeth you mean?
@Suji Beats wtf is wrong with you guys
@@englishmuffin3341 Dropped on our heads at birth probably.
@@englishmuffin3341 c'mon you guys are getting weird now
@@daniellima4391 hikaru 🤣
It's funny to watch to contrast in the videos of the two players: she's so animated and he's so calm.
Wow, I never seen your videos but the way you explain what's going on during the game is very concise and clear. Better than most.
you can really learn by erics ability to adjust his energy to match hers in the intro
I love how we can't tell what Anna is saying, but when she makes a really good move we can see it on her face. And then Eric starts squirming, it's so great.
1:23:39 Eric starts to wink at an empty room out of the blue
hmm
“These pawns don’t scare me.”
- IM Eric Rosen
22:31 is a genuinely lovely moment from eric
I love it when Eric says " Showing No Mercy. " It just shows how determined he is for the win and I can see the aggression in his eyes.
You are the best chess content creator in youtube. I learned a lot from you every time you upload videos
I feel asleep to many of your videos so now UA-cam thinks I’m obsessed with chess.
I like how Anna can't stop wobbling for whole 4 hours
Bro you two are the best combo to watch, it’s so entertaining
Hi Eric! Thanks so much for sharing your love for chess, and your wholesomeness. No day is complete without your video.
Eric is such a wholesome young man.
@01:04:25 "I think I'll take and... may be cry" lmao dude's funny af 😂
The 3:22:32 "Subscribe :)" hahahahah Very good Eric, you're awesome!
She's bringing my boy such pain but she looks so happy
Oh but then he gave her the hurt right back. Let's go Eric.
“Chaos is a ladder” ~ Eric Rosen.
What a wonderful pair of people these 2 are
Thank you for the great chess content, Eric!
For future reference, the reverse Englund Gambit trap attempt would have failed miserably if Anna had spotted dxc2. Sure, white wins the queen with Bxf7+ followed by Qxd8, but since Rosen began the game with no rook on a1, black captures the b1 knight and promotes... Yikes
Hey I don't know if you read these Eric but with the lockdown here in the UK I've been having dinner by myself a lot and this one video has literally kept me company for a week. You're the man.
Anna has smile bigger, than her face :)
It's not that her mouth is big, but her head (and brain) is small
@@thegorn Bruh
She’s pretty asl
@@DaviniaHill they thirsty but can never find something to drink
@@thegorn what a nasty thing to say.
Thanks!
am liking the return of the longer videos :D
2:39:52 , I don't know, do I have a hat? No, I don't have a hat : )))
My man coming in with a whole WEEKEND'S worth of seratonin for me
Sorry for being annoying but it's serotonin not seratonin
@@aleksandarpetkovic747 well being sorry won't necessarily make you any less annoying just saying lol
@@fitstar8871 pointing out that you're "just saying" doesn't mean anybody cares
1:56:59 both their smiling is adorable
They have completely different energy levels and yet they each remind me of the other
27:05 dudes in relationships
bruh XDDD
Way to go! I watched the whole thing
Coming up next: Pia Cramling gives time & knight odds against Eric!
Way to make your handicap an advantage! Does Eric play freestyle chess?
Has there ever been an odds match where the lower rated player can see the evaluation bar?
Why is this such a good idea yet nobody has done it I want to see this
It won't help though because the bar only changes after you make a move.
@@Wincynin it helps because you know how bad/good your opponent's move was and you can know if you have some sort of tactic...
@@Wincynin it definitely helps, it moves when the opponent moves too, thats why you cant use it in online games, do you even play chess? lol jk
@@derrickwayne4627 I feel like knowing that your opponent has made a really good move doesn’t stack the odds in your favor in the worst case it would just pressurize you even further. What I meant to say is that you’ll only know you made a good move or didn’t fuck up only after your turn is over. If you are referring to a bar that can show you the outcome of different moves available before committing only then it’ll be useful. But that definitely is cheating. I don’t know why people comment before thinking, it’s only there because it doesn’t help. If it were to help it’d be considered external help, hence cheating. Obv we’re talking about a higher level vs lower level player game.
Anna actually did way better than I'd thought. Nice.
Better? With piece up? Maybe I just overstated her thinking she is "just" terrible while you need to seek for some very flavourish adjectives. That indeed may be the case.
@@DonFreeq Yeah, much better than i'd think actually cause the rating difference is massive.
@@hthought But just imagine... Would you score below 50% against sb with 125% of your rating (1600 vs 2000 for example) being piece up and having time odds? I know you can't exactly scale that way, but just for instructional purposes. It's abysmal score.
@@DonFreeq Less than 50% more than likely. Elo 1600 vs 2000 is the difference between amateur and pro.
@@hthought Highly doubt it. Normally with only times odds you score on avg. much below, but with piece up and time odds it's not the case anymore. She should be crushing him in most games.
400 elo is also way less difference than you think. It's large gap, but you can overtake it, while here we are talking about massive odds. It's mostly about attitude because just as Judith Polgar said chess is about 40% psychology.
"There's a funny line - nevermind" 😂😂 I'm dead
25:55 eric said “how bad could it be”... fanous last words haha
Why am I watching Eric Rosen play Anna cranking at 10pm lol
When Eric is sacrificing piece to win "Oh no I got forked."
Loved the video, thanks! Making up powerful openings on the fly like that reminded me of Magnus playing freestyle chess! Do you play freestyle, Eric?
That Bird is the Word game at 3:09:18 was a masterpiece. Sac and attack!
Eric “there’s a funny line, oh nevermind” Rosen
His voice is amazing
Not too soft or too loud or not average
You’re a boss
@@darnk9785 no he’s a mad scientist
In old games we don't try to challenge in the center of the board. We always try to infiltrate pieces stuck by pawns. We go all the way across the board.
7sec on the clock:
Eric: wait **a minute**
:D
2:40:40 “I don’t even know what this, it’s like b3 Sicilian combined with Grand Prix Attack…. maybe I’ll just get a coffee machine”
4 hours!!1 wow, that's really awesome
"This position is nothing to sneeze at"
©Eric Rosen
i wanna thank you, because of your videos i jumped from 1100 to 1800 today 🥰🥰🥰
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS I LOVE THESE KINDA VIDEOS
„Sometimes when you wanna win you just make chaos"
Littlefinger knew this tactic
I like how its called the ‘london’ and eric doesn’t find the pawn structure resembling something related to ‘london’
You guys are the most wholesome players my favourite streamerw
40:10 they both say "Play F6" at the same time ;)
58:04 my favourite DUH
You are freking awesome Eric!
Watching 2 wholesome chess player play together is just...
1:23:39 the wink!
@EricRosen
Please explain the position at 3:44:04
In this position if black just takes the pawn on c2, you may end up with Bxf7+, Kxf7, then queen takes queen, that's true, but the pawn will take the knight on b2=Q and the queen is reborn. You will probably take black's light-square Bishop then, and black just goes Queen (the re-born one) to e4 and defends the b7 pawn and you will probably be in trouble.
I believe the trap works in normal positions but in this specific one, as you've got no rook on a1, you will end up with a losing position. Am I missing something?
It's true the trap doesn't work exactly the same, as the queen is reborn. It does still win a pawn and pins the opponents b8 knight so I think it would be favourable.
the rules eric will have1) less pieces 2)less time 3)will have to be blindfold and 4)has to drink a pint of lager after each move. Sounds fair
Man... that premoved mate was brutal
2:24:46 "nononononono..." lol
When in trouble, fake a gambit
That second game was so bloody and brave...
Thx for the content Eric
Is it a giveaway of unconditional fandom to like a 4-hour vid 20 minutes after posting?
Is the perpendicular to the bisector to the photosynthesis of the bisector after posting?
no, ur 19 mins late
@@chrisding1976 redtube
Hi Eric, great content! would you say the mistake in the London game you lost was to open the position with the king in the middle?
ahhh ultra aggressive grob was soooo tense!
that smile brings so much power
At 33:10 could you anyone tell me why F5 was such a game changer? Couldn't white still play Bf6 or Bh6 and carry on with the plan Eric was explaining previously? I can't see the vital difference F5 makes by black that prevents that plan.
It frees up a defensive square for the rook so that Rf7 becomes a possibility. And if Qg3 then Qd7. If further castles followed by R1g2 and Rdg1 then simply Rc8 followed by Rc7. Sure, White exerts some pressure on the g7 pawn, but ultimately has little attacking potential. His only hope in the game becomes pushing the h-pawn, but I think that's just too slow, as it gives Black time to hide the king on f8 and eventually transfer him over to the centre of the board (to a square like d7), for example, where he will be hugged by a swarm of friendly pieces.
Granted, Bf6 would still probably have been White's best try because it was the only attempt at formulating some sort of attack by White, and because of the threat of what was actually played in the game, but it was still far too easy to defend against. Eric likely wanted to be tricky and come up with a continuation in which Anna was more likely to blunder.
EDIT: Just checked with the engine. Bf6 and bh6 are indeed White's only options besides castling queenside.
F5 is strong because it prevents white from winning material while shutting down the attack
So erics idea of f6 bxf6 rxf6 qxf6 the material and position is even maybe even slightly better for white. now a more realistic line would be f6 bxf6 rf7 where white would have 2 pawns for a knight blacks still better (engine gives 1.7) but attacking opportunities.
Now that same idea after f5 doesn't really do anything F5 bf6 rf7 qh6 qd7 white has no attack blacks up a knight the center will be opening (engine gives black 4.7)
@@mattr791 @Max Khovanski Thank you both very much for the clear explanations they really helped me understand the position better as I didnt understand what was going on very well.
Eric is having a lot of mating ideas in this video
Omg Eric Rosen and Anna Cramling!
1:24:38
I don't understand why Anna played that move. She could have at least taken the rook. It put your knight one turn further from her king's current position, but I doubt that is worth letting you keep your rook. What do you think her idea was? Just a blunder? Or an actual strategy that I'm unable to see?
I rewatched this match to see how you caught back up from so far behind, and so I'm very curious why Anna did that.
31:57 “the mighty duck” right?
Really fun!
Seeing a chess ad with Eric Rosen in it makes me feel hype idk why, LMAO
Hey Eric. Enjoyed the video. please enable clipping. I really wanted to clip from 1:56:45 and sleep to the sound of it every night.
I love falling asleep to his calm voice, he seems like such a reliable guy❤
"Right above me is Anna Cramling" oh god I wish I could say that
1:58:35
Why didn't you take Anna's bishop? Seems you and her both understood why, but I can't find it.
Because after he took i think she would play knight g4 check and that attacks the bishop with the queen, meaning shes up a pawn and since he’s already down material he didnt want to trade. (Thats what i saw at least maybe theres a mate or bigger trap lol idk)
@@elisa9992 Oh yes. Puts the bishop under attack by reveal. Thank you. I'm rather new to this; perhaps I'll be better at spotting reveal attacks now.
@@NicholasproclaimerofMessiah yeah, no problem! I didn’t see it at first either it’s very tricky
Fun fact, you can actually see her say "No! ...my rook!" right after she moves at 1:52:30
"I fell kinda bad, but also more happy"