Thanks for watching this video! I hope you'll give Gaurav, Muhammad, and Ali some love for their hard work. You can save 10% at ua-cam.com/users/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbVE5T3VONm5EXzlGaUwycE9jVFg1djc1OHh0UXxBQ3Jtc0tuckdickh1VFBCLVdiYkVpc3pzZWZLeDdiRHk2dmJEYlFaS1JRTGRQVWRhOUV3V0xCdlRyZ3otcHNBdE92bWFUc0U0OWdIQk5rNGplWS1FaHU1Zl9pakVNR2Z5TkU3cEg3UWRHcndEejNOMmdlbDdNNA&q=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.fiverr.com%2Fvisit%2F%3Fbta%3D238968%26brand%3Dfiverrcpa&v=9P5dlf9hS_U with coupon code THENEXTLAYER
Something to consider. When I freelance I make sure to do test prints on critical components to test for fit and function before sending it to the client. It reduces the number of revisions and reduces frustration. Plus, it actually reduces turn around time. For my premium clients, I send them a full print as part of the completed project.
Idk. I think $100 for the work involved sounds reasonable. I also think that Muhammad was clear on charging for more revisions, but it's a good headsup.
$100 isn't just reasonable, it's a borderline theft. He more than got his money's worth. I feel a lot of these freelancers are vastly underestimating their true worth.
I can 100% see the value in this but I'm the type of person who works with the mindset of "why would I pay someone when I can do it myself?" but I recognize that often they will do it MUCH better than I can. However I just don't get the sense of satisfaction as I would if I do it myself. Like changing the oil in my car. Forget the cost, just knowing it was done to MY standards, on MY schedule and that I know 100% that the right oil & filter were used and that the shop didn't scam me is FAR more valuable to me than having someone else do the job. Besides, I LOVE getting elbow deep and greasy. I know at the end that I did it and the sense of self-sufficiency is far more important to me than if someone else might be able to do it a little better. This is not to say there aren't jobs I will NOT do and that I am more than happy to pay for. Roofing for example. I've done it and I can do it but I am NOT going to do it ever again. That job sucks and it takes a special kind of person to do it more than once and I am NOT that type person. lol
really interesting. regarding the design I am not sure if a 45 degree angle will be enough, but maybe add a version that has place for a rubber or anti-slip-matte or something like that should increase the adhesion enough so there is no force on the usbc. The USB-C in the part is not what I would be concerned though, it would be the female usbc in the object you are charging. As those are typically soldered on a pcb they cannot flex and will break more easily if there is constant force on them.
Nice thinking. like it, but I don't see it beeing very flexible to move the chargers around or adding more as you have to take the multiboard down to screw the lock ring on the back. I would add an "hook" on top or it so you put the "hook" into the hole that is on top of the hole where the multibord connector goes in and then insert the multiboard connector and it should be very steady and hold good weight and can't get loose. Also having the cable going thru the multiboard connector could be done better I think. I would insert the cable under the multiboard connector and then up and into a sledge that is moveable. About the USB-C cable I would go with an angled connector so you will have the cable to the side and the bottom of the USB-C onnector in a fit "slot"and on a sledge so it can be moved closer to multiboard or further from the multiboard depending on how big the carging object is and that way have the center of gravity closer to the board. I would also make it so the surface where the charging unit is put is level so no problem with things falling down if the wall is shaking och it slide down or make unnesseary strain on the USB-C connector. I can't do CAD and I have to use MS Paint to fix a quick drawing of what my idé are and hope you understand what i mean or someone that can do CAD kan make it 🙂 Here is my picture of the idea: ibb.co/q3c7zH51 1: The sloped chargingstation with hook with cable going in from under the multiboard connector and into a slot in a sledge that is movable. 2. The slot for USB-C cable. So no strain on the cable as it's going to the side and when pussing in the unit to charge onto the USB-C connector will be firm as the bottom of the USB-C connector is on the bottom of the sledge. Or pulled the USB-C connector up a few cm from the slot and insertet in the unint to charg and then set down in the USB-C slot again). 3 The USB-C connector sledge that can move away or thowards the multiboard. 1: The change chargingstation with level surface instead of sloped. Don't see any goos use for sloped when charging as the risk of it falling or straining the USB connector is much higher than the use of it beeing sloped (IMO🙂)
Before switching to Multiboard I'd recommend reading the license. It's really not ideal for something that depends on a community to bring value to the ecosystem. The license requires that you publish any remixes under the Multiboard license. And you can't combine it with Creative Commons licensed parts because the licenses aren't compatible. The models you just published on Printables under CC BY-NC-SA violate the Multiboard license. Keep Making can also revoke your license anytime. At the same time you grant Keep Making certain irrevocable rights to your remix. It's not a community friendly project IMO.
The downside of the screw from behind idea is that if you ever want to (re)move the modules, you will actually have to take the multiboard off the wall to do it.
I did some test prints first and found I needed to print the Multiboard tiles at 99% size in x and y to get snaps to fit well. I guess you could also increase snap size to 101% maybe to make them tighter. I have found the screw in type connectors are best. I also found a really good honeycomb to multiboard adapter which has worked well.
you could have thrown a notch in the side of the screw for the charger mount instead of a negative piece in the middle, put it on the edge so u can slide the cable thru, like those power cable springs for the A1 and A1 mini's
The best thing is team work. I prefer the barder system. I have skills i exchange for tasks im no good at. My buddy knows Linux/ computers and i am a metal fabricator and design engineer. Togather most any 3D printing project we got in the bag.
the prices for the hours of work seem insanely low. Should have paid double or triple for the amount of hours spent on it paying reasonable rates Seems a bit like exploiting less developed countries workforces. The only saving grace is they get to set their own prices and terms but still feels right on that line of exploitation.
Pushing the USB-C heads through the nut isn't probably the best choice. I would rather make 3-4mm wide channel from the edge of the nut to the center, so it would have a cutout through which you can insert the cable to the middle hole, so instead of pushing the connector through the hole, you place the nut on the cable. As in, the nut profile isn't an O but C, not bigger hole for the connector but a cutout for the cable. Then it's also a bit more universal since the limiting factor isn't the size of the connector but the thickness of the cable and you can probably easily make the cutout 5mm wide without compromising the integrity of the nut and then pretty much all power cables should fit into the nut. I also should just fire up the Inventor and make a remix but I am currently just too tired after quite intensive 2 weeks of 3D CAD training. 😅
my suggestion for this is adding an U shape lip on the end that pulls out to let the charging device sit its weight on so there isnt so much weight and tension on the usb port. you can probably do something like 2 holes on the bottom end parallel to the diagonal and have different length lips that slides in with clicking teeth to adjust length. hopefully that makes sense. haha.
@@thenextlayer i will attempt it, i just got back into 3d modeling again so it will probably be wrong but it should look like something comprehensible. ;)
You should probably look into multiconnect. It might solve some of the problems that you had with snaps and screws on multi-board. Plus multi-connect also would give compatibility with honeycomb storage
@@thenextlayer I wasn't aware of multipoint. Must be one of the newer components. I still find that system hard to wrap my head around all the options. Going through all of the different pages, it is easy to get lost, and finding the right component directly on thangs is a nightmare. I would really like a single page filterable list of all the components. Be able to filter by "big thread" or various other criteria. Also, multiconnect works with HSW where I don't believe there is a multipoint compatibility. Are they the same size slot/key?
Glad you enjoyed it! And yeah, I want to get better at CAD, too. But, sometimes I can't justify spending the time on it, when I should be writing and recording the videos!
When I've been asked to do custom design work in the past I usually quote $40-50/hr of work. When I was working as a mechanical engineer full time my salary equated to around that much. Skilled software devs can make many times this. Honestly the prices you paid are insanely cheap. That final project, what looked like maybe 4-6 hrs of work including the messaging back and forth, $100 is nothing. I probably wouldn't open my CAD software for $10 lol.
Honestly I think 100$ is undercharging depending what his job is parametric CAD work can pay like 50$ an hour easily in industry so honestly I'd say for everything you paid for you got a good deal.
1500 for a turnkey product design isn’t actually that bad. You’re paying for a team and multiple revisions. And probably step files you could later send to a company that would make injection molds for mass production. For a company, $50-100 per man hour is common. So you’re paying for 15-30 man hours and they’re betting they can get it done faster. Design work is paid for by the hour, typically. It’s why freelancers in the US typically charge much more, it takes the same amount of time but our cost of living is much higher.
Instead of making the hole big enough to push the whole USB c connector through, could you have cut out one side wide enough to fit the wire through? It would have removed less of the thread, i think.
It was all super cheap, I would not do it for that. You and many others forget about the time wasting back and forth with the customer. That’s mostly the biggest part of the price.
$100 for what amounts to, at least, 2 hours work including the video meeting and reading the documentation seems cheap to me. Don't know what the hourly wages are in Israël, but getting any professional to do anything here in NL for less than €50,- per hour isn't going to happen :)
If you need an idea for solid "snap" mounts (I do not know the specific wall system you do now): I did one for HCW to solve that on printables: modell 524987 - including demo video. Maybe that may help you (for free ;-) )
Instead of going through the board connector why not go through one of the adjacent holes you are already covering that doesn't have the board connector.
that 1500 usd is reasonable dirt cheap if you think about it, this could be one of your future product's feature that you do not have the capacity to RnD and you try to off load the work for a third party and than mass produce it and release it on store shelfs. Lets be hones you asked for the one most headache inducing part of the "product" to figure out by somebody else.
Interesting, I'm surprised to hear you say that. To me it was like, wildly expensive, but I guess I'm used to using Fiverr for graphic design or stuff like that, so I'm not used to breaking $1K on there at all...
@@thenextlayer Its all about scaling, a 1k here or there is nothing when you working with 500k or even millions to design and create a product for mass production. Your perspective was home 3d printing but from an industry standpoint you asked somebody help you go over one if your product development hurdle and you probably showed the concept in that 6 minutes video with the wall attachment or drawer design and give away too much to other people to see it differently since most of the time the real intention is hidden so they assumed more than you showed.
@@thenextlayerwhen it comes to freelancers designing stuff like products and arts, I see it like this: You don’t pay for the time they spend designing your product, you pay for all the time and money they spent learning the skills to design your product.
@@thenextlayer this is another thing to look for when you ask for a commission to not scare away or give a wrong impression what is your real scope or what they think it is. From a human behavior standpoint is always more than you show and they assume this from the beginning since people want a cheaper price. This could be one of the potential reason why that team that had a meeting about this refuse the commission.
@@thenextlayer sorry for the third post, but I just remembered that the industry for a while turned to 3d printing prototyping for quick development after that they switch to injection molding or other method when its economically plausible or necessary. From the videos it can clearly be seen the 3d printed parts, that's also sign that you already had prototypes but you failed, from that previously mentioned perspective that you designing a product.
I think Mohammed deserved quite a bit more than the $100 you agreed on for the first batch of work. I wouldn't have blinked if $500 was the price. That's what I have against companies like Fiverr. It is a race to the bottom, and people don't get paid nearly what they are worth.
lol... I usually like your videos but I don't think these examples were good ones for the General Public. I don't think you did you wife justice as well. This video seems rushed to me. Using very Niche Projects and showing how Diverse the Pricing can be just shows how bad those market places are. Redo Video with a more realistic option for each.
@@thenextlayer That's not the direction I was cautioning about. The license allows them to rip the license out from underneath you at any time for parts you've created for the system. But I appreciate you thinking I was trying to tell you people don't deserve value for their hard work 🙄
Thanks for watching this video! I hope you'll give Gaurav, Muhammad, and Ali some love for their hard work. You can save 10% at ua-cam.com/users/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbVE5T3VONm5EXzlGaUwycE9jVFg1djc1OHh0UXxBQ3Jtc0tuckdickh1VFBCLVdiYkVpc3pzZWZLeDdiRHk2dmJEYlFaS1JRTGRQVWRhOUV3V0xCdlRyZ3otcHNBdE92bWFUc0U0OWdIQk5rNGplWS1FaHU1Zl9pakVNR2Z5TkU3cEg3UWRHcndEejNOMmdlbDdNNA&q=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.fiverr.com%2Fvisit%2F%3Fbta%3D238968%26brand%3Dfiverrcpa&v=9P5dlf9hS_U with coupon code THENEXTLAYER
I feel like Guarav is about to have more work than he knows what to do with. :)
Something to consider. When I freelance I make sure to do test prints on critical components to test for fit and function before sending it to the client. It reduces the number of revisions and reduces frustration. Plus, it actually reduces turn around time. For my premium clients, I send them a full print as part of the completed project.
Tell me why I want platinum.... with out telling me I want platinum .... nice
Idk. I think $100 for the work involved sounds reasonable. I also think that Muhammad was clear on charging for more revisions, but it's a good headsup.
@@plixplux this youtuber is a jew therefore the name muhammed is a red line for him
$100 isn't just reasonable, it's a borderline theft. He more than got his money's worth. I feel a lot of these freelancers are vastly underestimating their true worth.
@@Dalroth my thoughts exactly. 100$ is nothing
I cracked up at your water sign next to your monitor. Hilarious.
Thanks! I uploaded it to printables :)
Add cable channels from the underware project and you can route the cables with ease
I'm gonna bite my tongue. But I'll be doing... something.
Lmbo, underware
I can 100% see the value in this but I'm the type of person who works with the mindset of "why would I pay someone when I can do it myself?" but I recognize that often they will do it MUCH better than I can. However I just don't get the sense of satisfaction as I would if I do it myself. Like changing the oil in my car. Forget the cost, just knowing it was done to MY standards, on MY schedule and that I know 100% that the right oil & filter were used and that the shop didn't scam me is FAR more valuable to me than having someone else do the job. Besides, I LOVE getting elbow deep and greasy. I know at the end that I did it and the sense of self-sufficiency is far more important to me than if someone else might be able to do it a little better.
This is not to say there aren't jobs I will NOT do and that I am more than happy to pay for. Roofing for example. I've done it and I can do it but I am NOT going to do it ever again. That job sucks and it takes a special kind of person to do it more than once and I am NOT that type person. lol
Great video! Thanks for sharing the OpenScad file & automation for your tags. That looks like a great project for getting started with that software.
really interesting. regarding the design I am not sure if a 45 degree angle will be enough, but maybe add a version that has place for a rubber or anti-slip-matte or something like that should increase the adhesion enough so there is no force on the usbc. The USB-C in the part is not what I would be concerned though, it would be the female usbc in the object you are charging. As those are typically soldered on a pcb they cannot flex and will break more easily if there is constant force on them.
Good points I’ll try that!
Thank you. I design in Fusion but I do run into projects which stretch my skills. This is super helpful and will give them a spin!
Glad you enjoyed it!!
Nice thinking. like it, but I don't see it beeing very flexible to move the chargers around or adding more as you have to take the multiboard down to screw the lock ring on the back. I would add an "hook" on top or it so you put the "hook" into the hole that is on top of the hole where the multibord connector goes in and then insert the multiboard connector and it should be very steady and hold good weight and can't get loose. Also having the cable going thru the multiboard connector could be done better I think. I would insert the cable under the multiboard connector and then up and into a sledge that is moveable. About the USB-C cable I would go with an angled connector so you will have the cable to the side and the bottom of the USB-C onnector in a fit "slot"and on a sledge so it can be moved closer to multiboard or further from the multiboard depending on how big the carging object is and that way have the center of gravity closer to the board.
I would also make it so the surface where the charging unit is put is level so no problem with things falling down if the wall is shaking och it slide down or make unnesseary strain on the USB-C connector. I can't do CAD and I have to use MS Paint to fix a quick drawing of what my idé are and hope you understand what i mean or someone that can do CAD kan make it 🙂
Here is my picture of the idea: ibb.co/q3c7zH51
1: The sloped chargingstation with hook with cable going in from under the multiboard connector and into a slot in a sledge that is movable.
2. The slot for USB-C cable. So no strain on the cable as it's going to the side and when pussing in the unit to charge onto the USB-C connector will be firm as the bottom of the USB-C connector is on the bottom of the sledge. Or pulled the USB-C connector up a few cm from the slot and insertet in the unint to charg and then set down in the USB-C slot again).
3 The USB-C connector sledge that can move away or thowards the multiboard.
1: The change chargingstation with level surface instead of sloped. Don't see any goos use for sloped when charging as the risk of it falling or straining the USB connector is much higher than the use of it beeing sloped (IMO🙂)
That automation tool is pretty amazing
Thanks! I'm glad someone else sees the value, because I'm freaking STOKED about it.
Videos like this is why I subscribed !!! 👍👍👍
Glad you liked it! I was worried it would feel like an ad for Fiverr!
Before switching to Multiboard I'd recommend reading the license. It's really not ideal for something that depends on a community to bring value to the ecosystem. The license requires that you publish any remixes under the Multiboard license. And you can't combine it with Creative Commons licensed parts because the licenses aren't compatible. The models you just published on Printables under CC BY-NC-SA violate the Multiboard license. Keep Making can also revoke your license anytime. At the same time you grant Keep Making certain irrevocable rights to your remix. It's not a community friendly project IMO.
I’m not a purist.
Looking forward to the multiboard video. I'm looking into multiboard for my office, as well.
Dude that was a great video and a super interesting topic! I learned a lot. Thank you!!!🤗
And thank you for sharing all the files for free!♥️
Glad you enjoyed it!
The downside of the screw from behind idea is that if you ever want to (re)move the modules, you will actually have to take the multiboard off the wall to do it.
In my case it’s going on the side of a shelf so there will be access to the back
I did some test prints first and found I needed to print the Multiboard tiles at 99% size in x and y to get snaps to fit well. I guess you could also increase snap size to 101% maybe to make them tighter. I have found the screw in type connectors are best. I also found a really good honeycomb to multiboard adapter which has worked well.
you could have thrown a notch in the side of the screw for the charger mount instead of a negative piece in the middle, put it on the edge so u can slide the cable thru, like those power cable springs for the A1 and A1 mini's
@1:36 Oh hey, that's me!
Thanks for sending that over man, appreciate it :)
One of my conditions would be that they have to show me how they did it, so I could learn something.
The best thing is team work. I prefer the barder system. I have skills i exchange for tasks im no good at. My buddy knows Linux/ computers and i am a metal fabricator and design engineer. Togather most any 3D printing project we got in the bag.
the prices for the hours of work seem insanely low. Should have paid double or triple for the amount of hours spent on it paying reasonable rates
Seems a bit like exploiting less developed countries workforces. The only saving grace is they get to set their own prices and terms but still feels right on that line of exploitation.
Pushing the USB-C heads through the nut isn't probably the best choice.
I would rather make 3-4mm wide channel from the edge of the nut to the center, so it would have a cutout through which you can insert the cable to the middle hole, so instead of pushing the connector through the hole, you place the nut on the cable. As in, the nut profile isn't an O but C, not bigger hole for the connector but a cutout for the cable.
Then it's also a bit more universal since the limiting factor isn't the size of the connector but the thickness of the cable and you can probably easily make the cutout 5mm wide without compromising the integrity of the nut and then pretty much all power cables should fit into the nut.
I also should just fire up the Inventor and make a remix but I am currently just too tired after quite intensive 2 weeks of 3D CAD training. 😅
Oh, dang, THAT is a smart idea, why didn't I think of that....
my suggestion for this is adding an U shape lip on the end that pulls out to let the charging device sit its weight on so there isnt so much weight and tension on the usb port. you can probably do something like 2 holes on the bottom end parallel to the diagonal and have different length lips that slides in with clicking teeth to adjust length. hopefully that makes sense. haha.
You lost me. Wanna remix my design to show me? :)
@@thenextlayer i will attempt it, i just got back into 3d modeling again so it will probably be wrong but it should look like something comprehensible. ;)
@@thenextlayer posted the remix from your printables. its terrible modeling but hopefully it gets the point thru. haha
You should probably look into multiconnect. It might solve some of the problems that you had with snaps and screws on multi-board. Plus multi-connect also would give compatibility with honeycomb storage
He has an official solution, multipoint, which does the same, no?
@@thenextlayer I wasn't aware of multipoint. Must be one of the newer components. I still find that system hard to wrap my head around all the options. Going through all of the different pages, it is easy to get lost, and finding the right component directly on thangs is a nightmare. I would really like a single page filterable list of all the components. Be able to filter by "big thread" or various other criteria.
Also, multiconnect works with HSW where I don't believe there is a multipoint compatibility. Are they the same size slot/key?
Shoulda used David D's multiboard quick connect mounting. Stock mounts kinda suck for taking on and off and being strong...
Damn this would have been a nice video to try my services Jonathan😉
Yeah, you're absolutely right!
Better is to design your self, I started learning to design in fusion an it's a dream come true. I can design all I need (not as fast as a pro 😋)
This is a pretty neat idea.
I think for most people this is a solid option.
I feel like i just need to get better at cad tho.
Glad you enjoyed it! And yeah, I want to get better at CAD, too. But, sometimes I can't justify spending the time on it, when I should be writing and recording the videos!
@thenextlayer o yeah for you if makes sense to have a cad guy. For me my lack of cad skills is holding back my creativity.
When I've been asked to do custom design work in the past I usually quote $40-50/hr of work. When I was working as a mechanical engineer full time my salary equated to around that much. Skilled software devs can make many times this. Honestly the prices you paid are insanely cheap. That final project, what looked like maybe 4-6 hrs of work including the messaging back and forth, $100 is nothing. I probably wouldn't open my CAD software for $10 lol.
Do hoods help you think or is it that cold in your office? 🤣Great video though.
Both.
Great video.
He outsources them out to filipinos. Cant blame him bc filipinos are hard worker and speaks english well.
what's in the ToS that says you own the product?
Honestly I think 100$ is undercharging depending what his job is parametric CAD work can pay like 50$ an hour easily in industry so honestly I'd say for everything you paid for you got a good deal.
Wow
Have two snaps aligned vertically will make more stable
1500 for a turnkey product design isn’t actually that bad. You’re paying for a team and multiple revisions. And probably step files you could later send to a company that would make injection molds for mass production.
For a company, $50-100 per man hour is common. So you’re paying for 15-30 man hours and they’re betting they can get it done faster. Design work is paid for by the hour, typically. It’s why freelancers in the US typically charge much more, it takes the same amount of time but our cost of living is much higher.
Instead of making the hole big enough to push the whole USB c connector through, could you have cut out one side wide enough to fit the wire through? It would have removed less of the thread, i think.
Yep I’m trying that now! Don’t know why I didn’t think of it till someone commented.
Are you switching from HSW to multiboard ?
18:20 $100 dollars is *dirt cheap* for custom CAD work.
It was all super cheap, I would not do it for that. You and many others forget about the time wasting back and forth with the customer. That’s mostly the biggest part of the price.
u just need a slot for the cable, rather than gluing it in
Explain?
$100 for what amounts to, at least, 2 hours work including the video meeting and reading the documentation seems cheap to me. Don't know what the hourly wages are in Israël, but getting any professional to do anything here in NL for less than €50,- per hour isn't going to happen :)
Yeah, I guess that's true!
If you need an idea for solid "snap" mounts (I do not know the specific wall system you do now): I did one for HCW to solve that on printables: modell 524987 - including demo video. Maybe that may help you (for free ;-) )
Instead of going through the board connector why not go through one of the adjacent holes you are already covering that doesn't have the board connector.
Sorry I'm not sure I understand what you mean?
that 1500 usd is reasonable dirt cheap if you think about it, this could be one of your future product's feature that you do not have the capacity to RnD and you try to off load the work for a third party and than mass produce it and release it on store shelfs. Lets be hones you asked for the one most headache inducing part of the "product" to figure out by somebody else.
Interesting, I'm surprised to hear you say that. To me it was like, wildly expensive, but I guess I'm used to using Fiverr for graphic design or stuff like that, so I'm not used to breaking $1K on there at all...
@@thenextlayer Its all about scaling, a 1k here or there is nothing when you working with 500k or even millions to design and create a product for mass production. Your perspective was home 3d printing but from an industry standpoint you asked somebody help you go over one if your product development hurdle and you probably showed the concept in that 6 minutes video with the wall attachment or drawer design and give away too much to other people to see it differently since most of the time the real intention is hidden so they assumed more than you showed.
@@thenextlayerwhen it comes to freelancers designing stuff like products and arts, I see it like this:
You don’t pay for the time they spend designing your product, you pay for all the time and money they spent learning the skills to design your product.
@@thenextlayer this is another thing to look for when you ask for a commission to not scare away or give a wrong impression what is your real scope or what they think it is. From a human behavior standpoint is always more than you show and they assume this from the beginning since people want a cheaper price. This could be one of the potential reason why that team that had a meeting about this refuse the commission.
@@thenextlayer sorry for the third post, but I just remembered that the industry for a while turned to 3d printing prototyping for quick development after that they switch to injection molding or other method when its economically plausible or necessary. From the videos it can clearly be seen the 3d printed parts, that's also sign that you already had prototypes but you failed, from that previously mentioned perspective that you designing a product.
I think Mohammed deserved quite a bit more than the $100 you agreed on for the first batch of work. I wouldn't have blinked if $500 was the price.
That's what I have against companies like Fiverr. It is a race to the bottom, and people don't get paid nearly what they are worth.
I’m surprised to hear that, I guess I don’t know how to price this type of service. At least I gave him a big tip and lots of publicity!
Or, you can just use masking tape and a sharpie. LOL
Video quality is very bad at scrolling motion.
I need to watch family guy again 20:43
A freelancer got mad at me because I cancelled during evaluation (personal problems), blocked me
$100 is pretty cheap really, he is doing it for publicity mainly
I didn’t tell him I was a UA-camr until after ;)
@thenextlayer Oh WOW!
But do they own the model? If I hire someone to make me a model, I expect to OWN the model, not just receive a copy of HIS model.
Luckily, I'm good enough in CAD to not have to do this. Too bad you can't outsource brain time.
lol... I usually like your videos but I don't think these examples were good ones for the General Public. I don't think you did you wife justice as well. This video seems rushed to me. Using very Niche Projects and showing how Diverse the Pricing can be just shows how bad those market places are.
Redo Video with a more realistic option for each.
Please be very careful with the multiboard license. It's kinda shit.
I’m not a purist and I value people earning for their hard work.
@@thenextlayer That's not the direction I was cautioning about. The license allows them to rip the license out from underneath you at any time for parts you've created for the system. But I appreciate you thinking I was trying to tell you people don't deserve value for their hard work 🙄
You didnt say what you are good at...
@@scott.adrian he said he was good at delegation
he's good at affiliate links, sponsored biased opinions. very good i would say
I think I shoot decent B-Roll and write a decent video script :)
Awww thank you! I'm flattered.
@@thenextlayer it's okay, we appreciate you bananyway, keep up the good links 😅