Yes! I'm celebrating £32K stock portfolio today... Started this journey with £3K.... I've invested no time and also with the right terms, now I have time for my family an…
when someone is straight forward and good at what she does best. People will always speak for them. For me I can would say give Mrs Olivia Duke of finance education a try and you be happy you did
Sierra space need Space X to avoid bankruptcy. delays in this industry lead to the unemployment line. they should drop ula and sue them for costing them revenue they need to stay in operation.
Say what you want about Musk but atleast he gets shit done (even if it’s at a later than promised date). Nasa has been working on Artemis for 17+ years now…where tf is it? In that time SpaceX has developed Multiple different types of Rockets and Spaceships while having a successful launch record in the Hundreds. SpaceX has built a Rocket Cheaper, Bigger and 5 TIMES FASTER than Saturn V. Not only that, The Rockets are all Reusable and doing the Impossible - Financially (100$ per kilo of Payload shot up into Space, estimated to drop down to 20$) and Tech Wise (Reusability, Power wise and versatility). All Unseen Before IN HISTORY and deemed ‘Impossible’ by Everyone. Now SpaceX will do In-Orbit Refuelling in Late February this year that had also been called ‘Impossible’ by NASA and by almost all Space Agencies + The World at large. SpaceX built a IVA and a EVA Spacesuit in a Few years with a Absolutely Fantastic and Mobile Design while Nasa blew Almost 300 Million Dollars on a Spacesuit that looks like a Overblown Cheap Diaper. SpaceX simply does everything better than Anyone else. Musk is a Mad Lad that deserves all the Benefits of Doubt and he does deserve to be Earth’s First Trillionaire. Let’s get to Mars before 2030. Even if it’s an Unmanned Starship landing there just to show we can.
Don't blame SpaceX for the issues of Dream Chaser. Blame NASA. Also, blame the 2021 - 2025 political administrator of NASA. Most of the people on this board voted a certain way in 2020. Guess what? *Elections have consequences* .
Theoretically dreamchaser wouldn't need one to launch. It would be mostly a software issue where the DC wings would need to be pre-deployed, thus leading to "lift" causing the vessel to yaw slightly in one direction.
Good Morning, Kev. Put it on a Falcon Heavy. I've been saying this for months now. They have a bigger fairing now. So "Great." Make it happen. It's obvious that ULA isn't ready. The BE-4's aren't ready. So let's go. Sierra Space has to be frustrated. Great Update, Kev. Have a Great Day my Friend.
NASA Space plane!? Don't make me laugh. Current NASA couldn't accomplish this in their dreams. Sierra Space is the architect and manufacturer of this wonder!
I don’t understand why NASA doesn’t have requirements for launch vehicles to be able to put varying payloads into space before writing checks. Also, space suit and life support compatibility between capsules.
I don't see Starship as a competitor to Dream Chaser. That would be like saying NASA's crawler-transporter is a competitor to a Van to transport people around.
What modifications would have to be done before Falcon or Super heavy needs to be accomplished. Has the manned version of Stream Chaser began construction.? Oh yeah, great.
@@miguelespinosa80 Dragoon is not reusable, and Space x is currently charging Nasa significantly more than the promised cost per launch. Dream Chaser is designed specifically for docking with the ISS as well as autonomous missions. It is already crew rated and will be capable of carrying far more payload mass. Dream chasher also has a far longer mission duration capability than dragon and could be permanently docked as a life boat replacing the souez. Dragons operational life is ending very quickly. Falcon 9 is not even capable of carrying the equivalent mass of a Dream Chaser. Falcon heavy most definitely has the power, but would require massive re-engineering. Not to mention that Elon is already charging a heafty price since they stopped trying to refurbish the booster. After Losing the dragon and ISS revenue space x would not be able to profitably operate much lower than the Vulcan, even if Elon's ego would let him Give them his foreign client discounts..
You know if Starship was more like a wedge shape type aircraft and twice the size of the space shuttle, then it could carry the Dream Chaser would fit inside the new design Starship and would not even have to fold it's wings up
Dreamchaser seems to be a qualitative shuttle, but the planned launcher becomes unavailable quickly. I always wondered why the Falcon was not planned as plan B in the Sierra Space program. It is not SpaceX's policy to refuse collaboration. Sierra Space is complementary to SpaceX on the shuttle, not on the launcher. It is in Elon Musk's character to love challenges and technical competition. And if SpaceX also collects a little money for this service...
¡Great! ✨😸 This would not be the first time that SpaceX has offered a transportation service to its competitors. A couple of years ago, they carried some Blue Origin satellites. The advantage that Dreamchaser has over Dragon and capsules in general is that it can land on any landing pad. It also lands much more gently than capsules do, and perhaps even more so than Starship itself. Which makes it ideal for transporting delicate cargo back to Earth. Like organs grown in space. Am I the only one who sees a dolphin's face on Dreamchaser's nose? 🐬✨😸
Great but is can it be done? Many time the devil is in the details. Are the fairing big enough, will ULA accept that one of it's client go. Is there a clause or a contract that they cant get out of? How much time to turn around?🤔
Did I miss where you cover whether SpaceX can launch the Dream Chaser? What is the point of your clickbait videos that do not cover the title and are comprised of fluff, pointless verbose adjectives and irrelevant filler?
For Deam Chaser to be successful, they need their own launch system. They should purchase UAL to control when their space plane launches. That said, they will have to change UAL's work culture.
I am at the beginning of my "investment journey", planning to put 385K into dividend stocks so that I will be making up to 30% annually in dividend returns. any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated
As a newbie investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of information can be a big hurdle. I've been making more than $200k passively by just investing through an advisor, and I don't have to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my finances remain secure. So I really don't blame people who panic.
how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
I thought NASA contracted the construction of this craft as part of their CRS-2 program? No they didn't turn the screws but I think it's theirs; Contract Number NNJ16GX07B
the thing is, the moment starship is fully operational, Dreamchaser is just outdated and unnecessary. Specially when Starship is much cheaper per Ton to orbit and per person.
SpaceX will almost certainly take the launch fees. Dream Chaser is unlikely to take a significant amount of business from Dragon, because it's a more complex airframe that will have greater maintenance costs and timelines.
@@AM-hf9kk Dragoon is not reusable, and Space x is currently charging Nasa significantly more than the promised cost per launch. Dream Chaser is designed specifically for docking with the ISS as well as autonomous missions. It is already crew rated and will be capable of carrying far more payload mass. Dream chasher also has a far longer mission duration capability than dragon and could be permanently docked as a life boat replacing the souez. Dragons operational life is ending very quickly. Falcon 9 is not even capable of carrying the equivalent mass of a Dream Chaser. Falcon heavy most definitely has the power, but would require massive re-engineering. Not to mention that Elon is already charging a heafty price since they stopped trying to refurbish the booster. After Losing the dragon and ISS revenue space x would not be able to profitably operate much lower than the Vulcan, even if Elon's ego would let him Give them his foreign client discounts.
As a beginner what do I need to do? How can I invest, on which platform? If you know any please share.
Yes! I'm celebrating £32K stock portfolio today...
Started this journey with £3K.... I've invested no time and also with the right terms, now I have time for my family an…
when someone is straight forward and good at what she does best. People will always speak for them. For me I can would say give Mrs Olivia Duke of finance education a try and you be happy you did
Started with 5,000$ and Withdrew profits
89,000$
I'm glad to write her tay I do hope she will help handle my paycheck properly☺️☺️☺️
Can I start with as low as $1,000?
Forget starliner all together. Elon please work with the Sierra Dream Chaser vehicle to roll out. It could be a 'dream' joint venture 👍
Sierra space need Space X to avoid bankruptcy. delays in this industry lead to the unemployment line. they should drop ula and sue them for costing them revenue they need to stay in operation.
Really
What made you say that
NASA has a change in management soon maybe they will move on some projects, they move at a pace they are used to.
My thoughts exactly handsome
I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that a bunch of people that work at Sierra Space used to work at SpaceX.
SpaceX is the only route to success for the project.
Say what you want about Musk but atleast he gets shit done (even if it’s at a later than promised date). Nasa has been working on Artemis for 17+ years now…where tf is it? In that time SpaceX has developed Multiple different types of Rockets and Spaceships while having a successful launch record in the Hundreds. SpaceX has built a Rocket Cheaper, Bigger and 5 TIMES FASTER than Saturn V. Not only that, The Rockets are all Reusable and doing the Impossible - Financially (100$ per kilo of Payload shot up into Space, estimated to drop down to 20$) and Tech Wise (Reusability, Power wise and versatility). All Unseen Before IN HISTORY and deemed ‘Impossible’ by Everyone. Now SpaceX will do In-Orbit Refuelling in Late February this year that had also been called ‘Impossible’ by NASA and by almost all Space Agencies + The World at large. SpaceX built a IVA and a EVA Spacesuit in a Few years with a Absolutely Fantastic and Mobile Design while Nasa blew Almost 300 Million Dollars on a Spacesuit that looks like a Overblown Cheap Diaper. SpaceX simply does everything better than Anyone else. Musk is a Mad Lad that deserves all the Benefits of Doubt and he does deserve to be Earth’s First Trillionaire. Let’s get to Mars before 2030. Even if it’s an Unmanned Starship landing there just to show we can.
Artemis production rate is a function of how much money the company can strip from the government
@ I’d say give the rest of Artemis’s money to SpaceX and let her rip.
Artemis had launched an Orion around the Moon
@@jimeditorial means nothing
@@Imthesoulofthes that is its mission. Lunar flight. Which it clearly can achieve
Go for spacex
I had hoped that Sierra Space would have completed its acquisition of ULA by now.
Great!
❤yes great
Don't blame SpaceX for the issues of Dream Chaser. Blame NASA. Also, blame the 2021 - 2025 political administrator of NASA. Most of the people on this board voted a certain way in 2020. Guess what? *Elections have consequences* .
Bill Nelson even went so far as to suggest that the Artemis program be an even more expensive copy of the Apollo program. 🙄🤦♂
What about the faring? Adapter compatibility?
Theoretically dreamchaser wouldn't need one to launch. It would be mostly a software issue where the DC wings would need to be pre-deployed, thus leading to "lift" causing the vessel to yaw slightly in one direction.
Great❤!!!!
Good Morning, Kev. Put it on a Falcon Heavy. I've been saying this for months now. They have a bigger fairing now. So "Great." Make it happen. It's obvious that ULA isn't ready. The BE-4's aren't ready. So let's go. Sierra Space has to be frustrated. Great Update, Kev. Have a Great Day my Friend.
It's the obvious solution 🚀
@@colonbina1 Right on.
Reliability...
Dreamchaser, as a design, has been around since I was a little boy. It looked cool then and it looks cool now, lets go!
That would be a Fab Collab! 👍🏿🚀
Great job 👏
Good morning
Have a nice day ☺️
NASA Space plane!? Don't make me laugh. Current NASA couldn't accomplish this in their dreams. Sierra Space is the architect and manufacturer of this wonder!
Great ! It needs to happen.
Great
❤️❤️❤️
I knew they would get on SpaceX, it was inevitable.
Agree 👍
great
Let’s do it
I don’t understand why NASA doesn’t have requirements for launch vehicles to be able to put varying payloads into space before writing checks. Also, space suit and life support compatibility between capsules.
I don't see Starship as a competitor to Dream Chaser.
That would be like saying NASA's crawler-transporter is a competitor to a Van to transport people around.
This is the smart way to carry people and cargo to orbit
GREAT!
At this rate it will be launched by starship.
What modifications would have to be done before Falcon or Super heavy needs to be accomplished. Has the manned version of Stream Chaser began construction.? Oh yeah, great.
Dummy payload or not, the fairings shouldn't wobble that iraticly😮
Obviously not recoverable.
@AZOffRoadster k
Honest competition is much needed in the new space. God's many Blessings to all. Thank you Kevin.
Thanks for your comment. Have a nice day ☺️
It all makes sense to me.
Yeah
Dragon crew has all the market right now but it's mot good for NASA to rely only. Only one provider. Maybe or how about New Gleen and dream Chaser?🚀
Currently, New Glenn can barely get off the pad. With a Dream Chaser on top, it would just sit there.
Blue needs to improve their T/W considerably.
@@FrancoisBrindamour that's why NASA contracts with several launch providers.
"mot" "Gleen" "rely only. Only one" ... helluva proof system you have there.
Man... they have been flying a "Space Plane" like this one for a decade...
Thanks for your comment. Have a nice day ☺️
Great-so what's the hold up? -so no more dragon capsule? -too bad, Dream chaser is the future.
Dreamchaser would not replace Dragon. SpaceX would simply provide transportation to Sierra Nevada.
@@miguelespinosa80 Dragoon is not reusable, and Space x is currently charging Nasa significantly more than the promised cost per launch. Dream Chaser is designed specifically for docking with the ISS as well as autonomous missions. It is already crew rated and will be capable of carrying far more payload mass. Dream chasher also has a far longer mission duration capability than dragon and could be permanently docked as a life boat replacing the souez. Dragons operational life is ending very quickly.
Falcon 9 is not even capable of carrying the equivalent mass of a Dream Chaser. Falcon heavy most definitely has the power, but would require massive re-engineering.
Not to mention that Elon is already charging a heafty price since they stopped trying to refurbish the booster. After Losing the dragon and ISS revenue space x would not be able to profitably operate much lower than the Vulcan, even if Elon's ego would let him
Give them his foreign client discounts..
You know if Starship was more like a wedge shape type aircraft and twice the size of the space shuttle, then it could carry the Dream Chaser would fit inside the new design Starship and would not even have to fold it's wings up
To be honest, if in the first place we actually focus development on spaceplane, rather then rocket, what would happen...
Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy are great options ... until Starship is operational.
Starship will replace this when it is operational
I'm not sure about their ballon space station. Have they inflated it and then take pot shots at it with various rifles?
Great just do it already. This subject has been covered a few times already but no decisions have been announced.
🚀🚀🚀
Where. Is Vulcan to launch it?
What good is it with no launcher ? BE -4 engines have a problem.
Yes!! Launching on Vulcan is plan, but hope that we won’t wait it too long
Dreamchaser seems to be a qualitative shuttle, but the planned launcher becomes unavailable quickly. I always wondered why the Falcon was not planned as plan B in the Sierra Space program. It is not SpaceX's policy to refuse collaboration. Sierra Space is complementary to SpaceX on the shuttle, not on the launcher. It is in Elon Musk's character to love challenges and technical competition. And if SpaceX also collects a little money for this service...
Great comment
Interesting and appears base on moon to travel to Mars seems ‘feasible’. Wonder…
Challenges ….
👍👍👍
When a great air and space company went from Boeing...to... BOING.
the dreamchaser is not ready lol
Dreamchasers gone on far too long let's SpaceX launch it😮
⭐🙂👍
Great. Anything and everything to make space flight cheaper.
❤️❤️❤️
Why bother with Artemis when we have Starship?
That is not only a space program
@@colonbina1 *[Artemis] That is not only a space program* . Correct, it's a jobs program for congress because it sure as hell does not fly much.
Why doesnt NASA go to musk and ask for a falcon 9 launch for it. Even Musk should show some leadership and offer it.
¡Great! ✨😸 This would not be the first time that SpaceX has offered a transportation service to its competitors. A couple of years ago, they carried some Blue Origin satellites.
The advantage that Dreamchaser has over Dragon and capsules in general is that it can land on any landing pad. It also lands much more gently than capsules do, and perhaps even more so than Starship itself. Which makes it ideal for transporting delicate cargo back to Earth. Like organs grown in space.
Am I the only one who sees a dolphin's face on Dreamchaser's nose? 🐬✨😸
Nice, and as always SpaceX keep lookin' up.
Good morning 🙏 🌄
kev 🌾✨️
~ 😺
📝
Good nite 😴 🥱 💤
My honor, thanks
@colonbina1 Hey 👋 😏
The boss megalomania will not allow?
Do it
New Glenn is the solution
Great but is can it be done? Many time the devil is in the details. Are the fairing big enough, will ULA accept that one of it's client go. Is there a clause or a contract that they cant get out of? How much time to turn around?🤔
Did I miss where you cover whether SpaceX can launch the Dream Chaser? What is the point of your clickbait videos that do not cover the title and are comprised of fluff, pointless verbose adjectives and irrelevant filler?
It would be great, but they need to stop the talking and get to work get it done. The longer they wait, the less likely it'll ever get done.
with dream chasers progress being slow, then this is just how the faa works. Snail slow, ice melt slow, ground moving slow
What made you say that handsome?
For Deam Chaser to be successful, they need their own launch system. They should purchase UAL to control when their space plane launches. That said, they will have to change UAL's work culture.
@@teekev125 why they build the spacecraft not the launcher
UAL has a major flaw, depending on due origin for rocket engines
@juliancrooks3031 BO made orbit on their first try
Can’t DEI space flight hardware unless you front it with15 years of grift
I am at the beginning of my "investment journey", planning to put 385K into dividend stocks so that I will be making up to 30% annually in dividend returns. any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated
As a newbie investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of information can be a big hurdle. I've been making more than $200k passively by just investing through an advisor, and I don't have to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my finances remain secure. So I really don't blame people who panic.
how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
I've just looked up her full name on my browser and found her webpage without sweat, very much appreciate this.
Sierra Space is not NASA. Their spacecraft is not NASA’s. Go away
I thought NASA contracted the construction of this craft as part of their CRS-2 program? No they didn't turn the screws but I think it's theirs; Contract Number NNJ16GX07B
How many heads will *explode* if/when ALL the new ships end up launching on Falcon? I'm here for the show LOL.
the thing is, the moment starship is fully operational, Dreamchaser is just outdated and unnecessary. Specially when Starship is much cheaper per Ton to orbit and per person.
where is blue O next rocket? lost on a spreadsheet i bet
Space x has no motive for launching the space plane as it would make the dragon capsule obsolete
Dreamchaser would not replace Dragon. SpaceX would simply provide transportation to Sierra Nevada.
SpaceX will almost certainly take the launch fees. Dream Chaser is unlikely to take a significant amount of business from Dragon, because it's a more complex airframe that will have greater maintenance costs and timelines.
@@AM-hf9kk
Dragoon is not reusable, and Space x is currently charging Nasa significantly more than the promised cost per launch. Dream Chaser is designed specifically for docking with the ISS as well as autonomous missions. It is already crew rated and will be capable of carrying far more payload mass. Dream chasher also has a far longer mission duration capability than dragon and could be permanently docked as a life boat replacing the souez. Dragons operational life is ending very quickly.
Falcon 9 is not even capable of carrying the equivalent mass of a Dream Chaser. Falcon heavy most definitely has the power, but would require massive re-engineering.
Not to mention that Elon is already charging a heafty price since they stopped trying to refurbish the booster. After Losing the dragon and ISS revenue space x would not be able to profitably operate much lower than the Vulcan, even if Elon's ego would let him
Give them his foreign client discounts.
Great
Yeah🤣
great
Great
great
great
Great
great
Great
Great
Great
Great
Yes great
Great
Great
Really 😂
Great
Great
Great
Great
Great
Great