Secondary Victims | Law of Tort

#law #education #learning
The Law Academy is a project designed to provide legal education for students studying law in the UK. Subscribe for more content.
- K. Horsey & E. Rackley, Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 2023)
- C. Brennan, Tort Law Concentrate: Law Revision and Study Guide (Oxford University Press, 2021).
- S. Green & J. Gardner, Tort Law (Red Globe Press, 2021).
- P. Giliker, Tort (8th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2023).
The law of tort in the United Kingdom is a branch of civil law that deals with civil wrongs or injuries caused by one party to another. It provides a legal framework for individuals to seek compensation for harm or loss suffered as a result of someone else's actions or omissions.
Tort law covers a wide range of situations, including negligence, intentional harm, and strict liability. Negligence is a central concept in tort law and involves the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. To establish a claim of negligence, the injured party must prove that the defendant owed them a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused foreseeable harm.
In addition to negligence, tort law also recognizes intentional torts, which involve deliberate acts that cause harm, such as assault, battery, and defamation. Strict liability is another important aspect of tort law, whereby a party can be held liable for harm caused, regardless of fault or intent.
Tort law in the UK is primarily based on common law principles, which means that it is developed through judicial decisions rather than legislation. However, there are also statutory provisions that govern specific areas of tort law, such as the Defamation Act 2013 and the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957.
Overall, the law of tort aims to provide a legal framework for individuals to seek redress for harm suffered, while also promoting the principles of fairness, justice, and accountability.
Disclaimer:
At no point are these video lessons intended to provide any sort of legal advice. These are for educational purposes only!
Image(s) Copyright: This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA

[@DonYutuc]

Awesome information although I have to focus on California law for now.

[@MrittikaReza]

someone not experienced(C) goes to mountain climbing with 2 other experienced climbers. They were given faulty equipment, however they were not aware of it. So when C reaches the top, considerably a safe zone, one of climbers falls and get head injury. Now the relationship between C and and injured person is just friend. After this incident C starts to get nightmares and anxiety. So his councillor asks him to go for therapy. Now later he states that “it could easily been him who’s equipment gave away” . So was he in immediate danger? Will he be considered primary or secondary victim? What do you think